Arxiv:2108.04790V1 [Quant-Ph] 10 Aug 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits Katrina Barnes, Peter Battaglino, Benjamin J. Bloom,∗ Kayleigh Cassella, Robin Coxe, Nicole Crisosto, Jonathan P. King, Stanimir S. Kondov, Krish Kotru,y Stuart C. Larsen, Joseph Lauigan, Brian J. Lester,z Mickey McDonald,x Eli Megidish, Sandeep Narayanaswami, Ciro Nishiguchi, Remy Notermans, Lucas S. Peng, Albert Ryou, Tsung-Yao Wu, and Michael Yarwood Atom Computing, Inc., Berkeley, California 94710, USA (Dated: August 10, 2021) We introduce an optical tweezer platform for assembling and individually manipulating a two- 1 dimensional register of nuclear spin qubits. Each nuclear spin qubit is encoded in the ground S0 manifold of 87Sr and is individually manipulated by site-selective addressing beams. We observe that spin relaxation is negligible after 5 seconds, indicating that T1 5 s. Furthermore, utilizing simultaneous manipulation of subsets of qubits, we demonstrate significant phase coherence over ? echo the entire register, estimating T2 = (21 ± 7) s and measuring T2 = (42 ± 6) s. The generation of a register of highly coherent, but in- ment [17, 18]. The difficulty of reliably measuring nu- dependent, qubits is a prerequisite to performing univer- clear spin states has historically limited the adoption of sal quantum computation [1]. All operations on a quan- nuclear spin qubits outside of ensemble quantum comput- tum computer, whether quantum or classical, will suffer ing demonstrations [19, 20]. As the control and detection from errors at a rate proportional to the ratio of the of individual quantum systems have advanced, the use length of the operation to the system's intrinsic coher- of the nuclear spin degree of freedom has consistently ence time. Fabricated qubit systems typically embrace shown favorable coherence when compared to electronic a technology roadmap that requires breakneck speed in spin degrees of freedom [21{24]. However, these demon- both the classical and quantum control signals to realize strations have either relied on a global control architec- high fidelity control [2{4]. In contrast, there has been ture or tailored interactions with neighboring quantum significant progress in utilizing naturally occurring quan- systems, both of which impede scaling to large numbers tum systems with intrinsically long-lived states to achieve of qubits using current technology. the same end goal [5, 6]. However, such systems have Individually trapped neutral atoms in optical tweezers historically struggled to achieve parallel single-site op- are a promising platform for the study of quantum many- erations while maintaining the demonstrated coherence body systems, combining exquisite control over the full times [7, 8]. Here we introduce a qubit encoded in two 87 quantum state of individual atoms with the ability to nuclear spin states of a single Sr atom and demonstrate efficiently scale to larger numbers of atoms with mod- coherence approaching the minute-scale within an as- est overhead and minimal reduction in the per-atom fi- sembled register of individually-controlled qubits. While delity [11, 12]. Until recently, optical tweezer systems other systems have shown impressive coherence times primarily used alkali metal atoms, which have favor- through some combination of shielding, careful trapping, able level structures for rapid loading and cooling of the global operations, and dynamical decoupling [6, 8, 9], we atoms, along with ground-state hyperfine structure that are now able to achieve comparable { if not longer { co- enables the manipulation of metastable spin states via herence times while individually driving multiple qubits microwave transitions [25{29]. However, optical tweezer in parallel. We highlight that even with simultaneous ma- technology is agnostic to the specific atom chosen. Re- nipulation of multiple qubits within the register, we ob- cent work has demonstrated the ability to use the same serve coherence in excess of 105 times the current length echo platform for trapping alkaline-earth atoms, which have of the operations, with T2 = (42 ± 6) seconds. Our arXiv:2108.04790v1 [quant-ph] 10 Aug 2021 attractive properties for the storage and coherent ma- results confirm that nuclear spin qubits are largely insen- nipulation of quantum information, as well as for cooling, sitive to trap induced dephasing effects without adding state preparation, and measurement of the internal state significant additional constraints on the trapping wave- of the atoms [10, 30{35]. length used. Combined with the technical advances that have led to larger arrays of individually trapped neu- In this manuscript we introduce Phoenix, a system for tral atoms [10{12] and high-fidelity entangling opera- assembling a register of highly-coherent qubits encoded tions [13{16], our results demonstrate that nuclear spin in the nuclear spin degree of freedom of atoms with a qubits offer a promising platform for the realization of closed-shell S-orbital. Importantly, Phoenix is able to intermediate-scale quantum information processors. apply tailored pulses to subsets of individual qubits in parallel|a crucial feature for gate-based quantum com- The proposed use of nuclear spins to encode and store putation. The system is an evolution of the alkali-based quantum information has a long history owing to their programmable quantum simulators that have recently isolation from undesired interactions with the environ- shown great success [11, 12, 36{38]. In particular, we 2 a c AOD SLM AOD Trapping tweezers e c n e c sCMOS s e r o u l z F y Rearrangement tweezer d Objective x PBS 15000 Qubit drive 10000 Cooling / Imaging isolation 5000 Shelving 0 b -100 100 200 300 400 5000 e Detector counts Load Image 1.0 Rearrange Cool / OP Encode Clock shelving Repump 0.5 Population 0 50 100 150 Time (ms) 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 1 2 3 4 Time (s) Frequency (kHz) FIG. 1. Machine to assemble a register of nuclear spin qubits. a) Schematic of the primary components of the optical tweezer system that trap, rearrange, manipulate, and read out the state of the nuclear spin qubits. The static trap array is generated using a spatial light modulator (SLM), rearrangement light is steered using a pair of crossed AODs and combined with the trap light on a polarizing beam splitter (PBS). Qubit drive light is combined with both of these beams using a dichroic mirror. All of these beams are directed into the microscope objective using another dichroic mirror that also transmits the collected atom fluorscence signal (461 nm) to the imaging system that forms an image on the commercial sCMOS camera. b) Experimental sequence timing. After loading the trap array, and again after several experiment repetitions (the exact number is varied based on the probability to lose an atom in each experiment), we perform rearrangement to fully fill the computational array, forming a register of qubits. c) Single fluorescence image demonstrating our ability to load over 100 atoms, which could be rearranged into a larger computational array than was used for this work. d) Histogram of photon counts collected from a single site. The two peaks indicate the presence (absence) of an atom that fluoresces on that site. e) Clock-state shelving spectroscopy taken when preparing the qubits in either j #i (red) or j "i (blue). By driving a transition at the frequency of the black dashed line, spin selective readout can be performed. trap individual 87Sr atoms in an array of optical tweez- SLM) which imprints a spatially varying phase pattern ers, prepare a uniformly-filled register of spin-polarized on the beam before it is focused by a high-numerical aper- atoms, then individually manipulate and read out the ture microscope objective. We are able to programmati- spin state of the qubits. We highlight the coherence of cally define the trap geometry (array size, shape, spacing, quantum information encoded in the ground-state nu- and relative depth) using the SLM, which gives us flexi- clear spin manifold of 87Sr atoms, demonstrating the ad- bility to rapidly change the computational array geome- vantages of this new qubit encoding and therefore the try depending on what is required for a particular compu- promise of this platform for quantum information stor- tation. For this work, we define a rectangular trap array age. with 110 total trapping sites (10 × 11 sites) with 4-µm Our array of optical tweezer trapping potentials is gen- separation between each trap center. The trapped atoms erated holographically, as shown in Figure 1(a), using a can be used to perform many tens of state-preparation, liquid-crystal on silicon spatial light modulator (LCoS circuit, and measurement cycles before reloading the trap 3 array. Figure 1(b) gives an example of one such cycle. a b The choice of array size is somewhat arbitrary; while the 10 × 11 array allows us to load ∼50 87Sr atoms on aver- age, we show in Figure 1(c) that a larger 14 × 14 array EOM 2 3 can trap over 100 atoms. EOM 1 P1 Atoms are initially loaded into the optical tweezers af- F = 7/2 ter several laser cooling stages described in [39]. We addi- vAOD 2 vAOD tionally perform Sisyphus cooling on the trapped atoms to bring them near the bottom of the optical tweezer po- 1 vAOD tential [30, 31, 39, 40]. The initial loading of traps is IIsolation s o l stochastic, so we define a subset of the trap array to be a t 2 hAOD i the computational array, which will define our register o n of qubits [25, 41]. The computational array comprises 1 hAOD 21 qubits in a fully-filled 7 × 3 sub-array of traps. We uniformly fill the computational array using a dynamic optical tweezer, pictured in Figure 1(a), that drags atoms 1S from filled sites and drops them into empty sites|a pro- 0 cess commonly known as rearrangement [29, 39, 42, 43].