Risks and Returns in Peer-to-Peer Lending Saman Adhami1, Gianfranco Gianfrate2, Sofia Johan3 1 Vienna Graduate School of Finance, Welthandelsplatz 1 1, 1020 Wien, Austria,
[email protected] 2 EDHEC Business School, 393 Promenade des Anglais, Nice, France,
[email protected] 3 Florida Atlantic University, College of Business
[email protected] Abstract FinTech, particularly digitalized funding has emerged in recent years as an innovative way to finance new ventures. However, funding mediated on digital platforms is “innovative” in itself, and, as such, it can be particularly risk, prone to failures and inefficiencies. We investigate whether peer-to-peer lending, one of the most potentially disruptive forms of digital funding, provides investors with returns consistent with the level of borne risk. By studying over 3000 loans mediated on 68 European platforms we show that the returns are inversely related to loans’ riskiness, suggesting that, on average, loans are mispriced. Our results have important implications for understanding the extent to which financial regulators could be involved in this rapidly growing segment of FinTech. Keywords: crowdfunding; FinTech; peer-to-peer lending; financial risks; innovation financing; financial anomalies; asset pricing. 1 1. Introduction Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, also known as crowdlending, refers to the money-lending activities (to individuals or businesses) through online platforms that match lenders with borrowers (Pierrakis and Collins, 2013). P2P lending is part of the FinTech “revolution” aiming at disintermediating financial services (Moenninghoff and Wieandt, 2012; Bruton et al. 2014). P2P lending platforms claim they can challenge traditional banks by providing a better (online) match of supply and demand of capital, and by operating with lower overhead - thus providing the service more cost efficiently than traditional financial institutions.