Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section Schedule of Objections And

Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs C.S. Abbott 7 Luzley Brook Rd, Royton, Oldham OL2 6SQ

0207/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0207/1/001/O

Mrs N. Abbott 38 Netherhouse Road, Higher Crompton, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7HY

0193/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0193/1/001/O

A.R. Ackroyd 25 Dorset Avenue, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5PL

0909/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0909/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0909/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0909/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr P Ackroyd 2 Wham Cottage, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw, Oldham

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 1 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0943/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0943/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0943/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0943/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Heidy Ackroyd 2 Wham Cottage, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5TZ

0941/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0941/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0941/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 2 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0941/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Susan Ackroyd 25 Dorset Avenue, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5PL

0910/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0910/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0910/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0910/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Adamson 98 Oldham Road, Grasscroft, Saddleworth, Oldham OL4 4HU

0601/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Objects to any development due to possibility of flooding of FD Ref: 0601/1/001/O properties down hill from site. Joint Case

Adept Development & Management Ltd Agent : Cordingleys Tamewater Mill, Delph New Road, Dobcross, Saddleworth, Oldham OL3 5BE

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 3 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0229/2/003/O B2.1 PEZ28 Tamewater Mill / Land adjacent to Mill Objection Map Change No 5/25. PEZ boundary changes are incorrect and inappropriate. Amend boundaries to reflect current business operations. Allow residential uses on the PEZ in line with recent Government policy statements.

C. Ainsley 45 Mills Hill Road, Middleton, Manchester

0838/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0838/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ian Ainsley 12 Canisp Close, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0NZ

0839/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0839/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

L. Ainsley 1026 Middleton Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9RZ

0836/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 4 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0836/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Nelson Ainsley 32 Nowell Court, Middleton, Manchester M24 6EY

0840/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0840/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr D Alcock 21 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

0911/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0911/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0911/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0911/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 5 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr & Mrs D Aldred Lyndhurst, Kinders Crescent, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JQ

1814/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A proposed food store will destroy existing Greenfield shops. Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to Joint Case local shops. Retain the mill. Remove reference to retail or limit the size.

S. E. Alexander 5 Range Lane, Denshaw, OL3 5R2

0916/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0916/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0916/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0916/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jean Alford 9 Clifton Holm, Delph, Oldham

0922/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 6 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0922/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0922/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0922/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Phillip Alford 9 Clifton Holm, Delph, Saddleworth

0918/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0918/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0918/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0918/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Ali 11 Armitage Close, Oldham, OL8 4LG

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 7 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1021/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1021/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1021/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1021/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dr & Mrs G Allen The Old Lodge, Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham

0923/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0923/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0923/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 8 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0923/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Georgina Allen 448 Rochdale Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6TS

0841/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0841/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

James Allen 7 Coverdale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UD

0844/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0844/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Sheila Allen 7 Coverdale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UD

0842/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 9 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0842/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Suzanne Allen 55 Chetwyn Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UJ

0843/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0843/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

L A Allsopp 15 Lovers Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4DP

1761/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mrs S Andrew 19 St. Mary's Drive, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DT

0754/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to wind developments in Saddleworth. Joint Case

Mr A.H Armson 5 Hull Mill Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UR

0927/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 10 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0927/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0927/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0927/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Martin Arthur 7 Oaklands Park, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4JY

1227/2/001/O NR3.2 13.81 Objection Area of search is too close to Dovestone. Boundary should be drawn back to more remote areas where turbines would not be seen from valley areas. Turbines close to Dovestone would ruin views attractive recreational area.

1227/2/002/O OE1.8 11.43 Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Objection Site should be landscaped to form parkland extension to Peak National Park.

1227/2/003/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Retail development would adversely affect local shopping facilities in Greenfield centre. Remove reference to retail development from the site designation.

John Arthurs The Old Toll House, 7 Thurstons, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5LR

0925/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 11 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0925/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0925/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0925/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Stephen M Ashurst The Moorlands, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5UN

0924/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0924/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0924/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0924/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mark Ashworth 5 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 12 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0845/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0845/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Michael B Ashworth 114 Wallhill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BH

0935/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0935/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0935/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0935/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Debra Aspinall Moor Cottage, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5UN

0936/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 13 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0936/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0936/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0936/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dr David Atherton 54A Manchester Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7HH

0368/2/006/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to the emphasis only being on wind farms and the areas of search map.

0368/2/007/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Housing is not main priority. Industrial component has to be real. Ensure all components of an approved application are developed, not just housing element. Include something to benefit the village that has a dearth of social and other amenities.

0368/2/008/O OE1.8 Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Objection Policy is too vague and lacks imagination for development of this sensitive site. Need to provide facilities for local people.

M. Atkins 9 Thorp View, Oozewood, Royton OL2 5XT

0846/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 14 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0846/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

John Attree 33 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

0847/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0847/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

James M Auld Broadhead, Delph, Oldham OL3 5LZ

0937/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0937/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0937/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0937/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 15 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Austin Timber Company Ltd (ref 4110) Agent : Emery Planning Partnership Ltd

0109/2/010/O B2.2 Objection Policy is too restrictive. Floorspace threshold and marketing FD Ref: 0109/1/002/O requirements are unjustified. Range of uses is unspecified. UDP fails Joint Case to recognise that some buildings are unsuited for modern business operations. (5.26-5.29)

0109/2/011/O H1 Objection Objection to various aspects of the policy, including assumptions FD Ref: 0109/1/001/O relating to clearance, exclusion of vacant dwellings and lack of Joint Case commitment to a timetable for the publication of annual reports, and the publication of SPG's.

G & H.J Austin 27 Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham Ol3 5UW

0940/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and Joint Case views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0940/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0940/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0940/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Gregory Backhouse 18 Turf Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 6BZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 16 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0848/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0848/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

BAE Systems Properties Ltd Agent : Fuller Peiser Westcott Venture Park, Westcott, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire HP18 0NP

0236/2/006/O R1 Lancaster Sports and Social Club, Chadderton Objection Change does not address the issue of redevelopment opportunities FD Ref: 0236/1/003/O on sites not valuable to the community but allocated. There has been no consideration regarding the 'value' of this site, therefore it should not be protected as open space.

0236/2/007/O R1.1 Lancaster Sports and Social Club, Chadderton Objection The need for applicant to demonstrate, through an independent assessment, that a site is not valued by the community. Facilities such as the Lancaster Sports and Social Club, that are not valued by the public, should be not be allocated open space.

Emma Bagshaw 11 Riverbank, Dobcross, Oldham

0939/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0939/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0939/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 17 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0939/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Miss C. Bailey 271 Rochdale Road, High Crompton, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7HT

0330/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0330/1/001/O

Mr & Mrs Bailey The Orchard, 19 Park Lane, Greenfield OL3 7DX

1762/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

S. Bailey 17 Fernlea Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2QH

0849/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0849/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Anthony J Baker Saddleworth Hotel, Delph, Oldham OL3 5LX

0938/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 18 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0938/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0938/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0938/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Scott Baker The Saddleworth Hotel, Huddersfield Road, Delph, Oldham

0942/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0942/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0942/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0942/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs B Bakes 40 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 19 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1847/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt/ Local Green Gap designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft, due to limited access to the land, loss of recreation and birdlife.

H & J Ball Horest Farm, Horest lane, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SU

0944/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0944/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0944/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0944/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jack Ball 78 Chadderton Park Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0QB

0851/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0851/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 20 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

S. Ball 87 Cathedral Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0RG

0850/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0850/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs Barber 3 Summerhill View, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5TB

0945/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0945/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0945/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0945/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Nathan Barber 1179 Middleton Road, West Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0NN

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 21 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0852/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0852/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Roy Bardsley 52 Church Road, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6EJ

1840/2/001/O NR3.1 13.77 Objection The contribution of turbines to the reduction in global carbon emissions does not constitute the very special circumstances that Joint Case would justify inappropirate development in the green belt.

1840/2/002/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and Joint Case views in/out of the Peak NP.

1840/2/003/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their Joint Case inappropriateness in greenbelt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1840/2/004/O NR3.2 13.86 Objection Delete first two sentences in para 13.86. Possible minute contribution to reducing global carbon emmisions should not in itself Joint Case be used to justify the impact on the landscape arising from wind turbine developments.

1840/2/005/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally or regionally Joint Case designated sites.

A. Barlow 373 Shaw Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6NZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 22 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0364/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0364/1/001/O

C Barnes Hame, Buckstones Road, Oldham OL1 4SU

0948/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0948/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0948/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0948/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J & P Barnes 9 Ripponden Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SH

0946/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0946/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 23 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0946/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0946/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J.H Barnes 2 Nudger Green, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AW

0947/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0947/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0947/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0947/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Ray Barnes 92 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

0854/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 24 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0854/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs M Barnes 92 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

0853/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0853/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

C. Barnett 18 Longfield Park, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BU

0374/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0374/1/001/O

M. Barnett 18 Longfield Park, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BU

0523/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0523/1/001/O

A & C Barrass 6 Delph Lodge, Midgrove Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5ER

0949/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 25 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0949/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0949/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0949/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Neil Barrow Carr Farm Cottage, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5ND

0950/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0950/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0950/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0950/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Martin Barton 14 Fairfields, Garden Suburbs, Oldham OL8 3AS

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 26 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0855/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0855/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Jane Bassett 29 Norwich Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0BA

0856/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0856/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Heather Bates 14 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QE

0951/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0951/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0951/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 27 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0951/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Colin Baxter 65 Healds Green, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SP

0857/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0857/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr G Bayley 31, Stoneswood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DY

0112/2/015/O NR3.1 Objection Policy does not protect the interests of the Peak District National Park. Joint Case

0112/2/016/O NR3.1 Objection Wind turbines should not be permitted closer to residential buildings than the minimum distance recommended by the manufacturer. Joint Case

0112/2/017/O NR3.1 (c) Objection Objects to the lack of reference to protection of the Green Belt within the policy. Paragraph NR3.1 (c) of First Deposit Draft Joint Case Replacement UDP should be retained.

0112/2/018/O NR3.2 Objection Delete the areas of search for wind developments map. The policy is flawed. It should be more favourable to development outside the Joint Case search area.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 28 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0112/2/019/O NR3.2 (d) Objection Amend NR3.2 (d) to ensure that proposed development would be at least 1.5 km from any sensitive existing land use, especially housing. Joint Case

0112/2/020/O NR3.2 13.82 Objection Areas of search map is contrary to Government policy. Delete the paragraph. Joint Case

0112/2/021/O NR3.2 13.86 Objection Amend paragraph so that developments will not be permitted within the Green Belt or adjacent to and detrimental to the Green Belt. Joint Case

0112/2/022/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Wind developments should only be permitted in non Green Belt areas. Wind developments would be visible from adjacent local Joint Case authority areas and Peak National Park. Proposals in Oldham would impact on residents of other areas. Delete paragraph.

0112/2/023/O NR3.3 13.92 Objection Objects to the first sentence of paragraph 13.92. The link between CO2 emissions and climate change is not proven. Amend first Joint Case sentence of paragraph to read: "The Council is committed to encouraging a reduction in carbon dioxide."

0112/2/024/O C1.1 Objection The deletion of "including views in or out" from the policy reduces the protection of the environment of conservation areas. The Joint Case wording should be reinstated.

M. H. Beaker 1 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham

1848/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

B A Beddows 31 Harvard Street, Rochdale, OL11 2HA

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 29 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1023/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1023/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1023/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1023/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Rebecca Beesley Knarr Barn, Knarr Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5RH

0952/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0952/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0952/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 30 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0952/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Shahida Begum 103 Garforth Street, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 6RW

1025/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1025/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1025/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1025/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Colin Bell 1 Hamilton Close, Bury, BL8 1LA

1027/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1027/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 31 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1027/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1027/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Bellway Homes The Beacons, Wellington Road, Birchwood, Warrington WA3 6GQ

0104/2/015/O H1.1 H1.1.19 Andrew Mill, Greenfield Objection Site constraints will lead to a lower capacity that the 30 dwellings indicated in the UDP. Reduce the capacity further.

0104/2/016/O H1.1 H1.1.19 Andrew Mill, Greenfield Objection The reference to affordable housing should be deleted - the site is not suitable for affordable housing.

0104/2/017/O NR2.2 Objection The flood risk area around Andrew Mill, Greenfield (Map Change ref: 13/15) is relatively diagrammatic and could be misleading. The precise flood risk area should be agreed with the Environment Agency before inclusion on the final map. Bellway Homes Agent : Chorlton Planning The Beacons, Wellington Road, Birchwood, Warrington WA3 6GQ

0104/2/014/O H1.4 Objection Policy too restrictive in requiring higher density developments in areas with good/very good access to public transport options and a Joint Case range of basic services. The advice in PPG3 on densities is adequate. Delete ref. to 45/50 dwellings per hectare.

Aaron Bennett 11 Melford Grove, Lees, Oldham OL4 3HH

0954/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 32 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0954/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0954/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0954/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Miss S. Bennett 21 Greencroft Meadow, Oldham, OL2 6LQ

0517/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0517/1/001/O

Mr&Mrs J. Bennett 15 Netherhouse Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EX

0586/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0586/1/001/O

R & P Bennian & Reynolds 58 Hebron Street, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1849/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

A.S. Bentley 65 Highlands, Royton, Oldham OL2 5HL

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 33 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0858/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0858/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

G Bentley 35 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0585/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0585/1/001/O

J. Bentley 65 Highlands, Royton, Oldham OL2 5HL

0859/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0859/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J Bergin 7 Dacres Drive, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7HP

1028/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 34 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1028/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1028/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1028/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Helen Berry 27 Bracken Close, Springhead, Oldham OL4 4PB

0959/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0959/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0959/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0959/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Bescoby 5 Ammons Way, Delph, Oldham OL3 5US

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 35 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0962/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0962/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0962/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0962/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jill Beswick 50 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0065/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Policy still allows possible buildings which would mean loss of FD Ref: 0065/1/001/O woodland, wildlife and local amenity. Saddleworth already built up and roads are becoming overcrowded and dangerous.

Ben Bethel 10 Earl Street, Heaton Park, Manchester M25 1GQ

0860/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0860/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 36 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

G. Bickerstaffe 4 Kings Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BJ

0590/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Land should be protected from building of any kind. FD Ref: 0590/1/001/O Joint Case

Gillian Bickerstaffe 4 Kings Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BJ

0587/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Land should be protected from building of any kind. FD Ref: 0587/1/001/O Joint Case

V. Bickerstaffe 4 Kings Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BJ

0589/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Land should be protected from building of any kind. FD Ref: 0589/1/001/O Joint Case

Mrs A.H. Billing Top O'Th Fold, Old Tame, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SS

0971/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0971/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0971/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 37 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0971/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sheila P. Billingsley 9 Court Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6HD

0965/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0965/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0965/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0965/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Catherine Bingley 1 Delph Greave Barn, Delph Greave, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TY

0970/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0970/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 38 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0970/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0970/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ms A. Bintliff 6 Nudger Green, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AW

0967/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0967/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0967/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0967/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr T. Bithell 19 Denbigh Drive, Oldham, OL2 7EQ

0491/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0491/1/001/O

P. Blackshaw 7 New Tame, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TS

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 39 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0973/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0973/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0973/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0973/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

T. Blackshaw 7 New Tame, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TS

0972/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0972/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0972/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 40 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0972/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

N. Bocking 122 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BH

0975/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0975/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0975/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0975/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sheila Bocking 405 Oldham Road, Lydgate, Oldham OL4 4DG

0980/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0980/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 41 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0980/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0980/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Joan Bolton 476 Burnley Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2QT

0861/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0861/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr M. Boone 47 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

0862/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0862/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

D Booth 19 Outram Mews, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BE

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 42 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0992/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0992/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0992/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0992/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ken Booth Ceann, Friezland Lane, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7EU

0993/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0993/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0993/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 43 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0993/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Bostock 49 Albert Street, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

0864/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0864/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Sharron Bostock 17 Colville Road, Oldham, OL1 2NX

0863/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0863/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J & J Bottomley 8 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QB

0994/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 44 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0994/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0994/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0994/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Carol A Bottrill 2 Moorland Avenue, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QF

0996/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0996/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0996/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0996/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Miss Jill Boughey 2 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 45 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0997/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0997/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0997/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0997/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

K.H. Boulter 31 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

0865/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0865/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

A. Bowater 18 Tavistock Drive, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0RQ

0998/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 46 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0998/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0998/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0998/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs C Bowden Causeway Sett Cottage, Castleshaw Valley, Delph, Oldham

0999/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0999/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0999/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0999/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

H.J. Bowes 39 Central Avenue, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DH

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 47 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1045/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1045/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1045/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1045/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Carl Bowker 1 Brooklands Street, Middleton, Manchester M24 2LF

0866/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0866/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Harry Bowker 11 Kings Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BJ

0220/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0220/1/001/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 48 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr&Mrs J. Bowker 9 Pennine Vale, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8DH

0393/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0393/1/001/O

Mr&Mrs M. Bowker 19 Palin Wood Rd, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

0157/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and Joint Case views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0157/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their Joint Case inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0157/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally Joint Case designated sites.

0157/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously Joint Case impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

G Bowler 6 Ainley Wood, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HL

1030/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 49 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1030/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1030/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1030/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs K Boyle 16 Peak Close, Moorside, Lancs OL4 2TH

1031/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1031/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1031/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1031/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Thomas R Boyle 16 Peak Close, Moorside, Oldham OL4 2TH

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 50 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1032/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1032/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1032/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1032/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

A Bradbury 21 Delph New Road, Dobcross, OLDHAM OL3 5BA

1807/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A supermarket would radically change the village. Cancel the supermarket and have smaller shops in keeping with Greenfield's Joint Case village character.

Andrew Bradbury 26 Corbett Way, Denshaw, Oldham 3 5SX

1000/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1000/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 51 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1000/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1000/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D L Bradbury 4 Bunkers, Tunstead Lane, Greenfield OL3 7NY

1763/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

B & J Bradley 39 Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1001/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1001/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1001/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1001/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 52 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Jon Bradnum 58 Wellington Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 78Q

1764/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Carol Braithwaite 1024 Middleton Road, Chadderton, OL9 9RZ

0867/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0867/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Paul Braithwaite New Tame, Tame Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TT

1002/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1002/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1002/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 53 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1002/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Vicky Bramley 1 Bealbank Close, Newhey, Rochdale

1033/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1033/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1033/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1033/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Doug Branson 4 Pickhill, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BN

1003/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1003/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 54 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1003/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1003/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

C.E. Brayzier 11 Alexandra Mill, Mill Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6NA

1004/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1004/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1004/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1004/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr A Brereton 2 Healds Close, Chadderton, OL1 2SP

0868/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 55 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0868/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs M Brereton 2 Healds Green, Chadderton, OL1 2SP

0879/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage

0879/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Leon Brett 16 Hough Close, Hathershaw, Oldham OL8 2NZ

0887/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0887/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists

0887/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0887/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 56 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

T Brewster 6 North Rise, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7ED

1772/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mr David Bridges 86 Wetherby Drive, , OL2 5TA

0905/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage

0905/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

P & G Brisk 145 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7JN

1765/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

P. Brisk 145 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7BN

1005/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1005/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 57 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1005/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1005/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

British Rail Property Board Agent : Lambert Smith Hampton C/o Agent, ,

1894/2/001/O H1.1 H1.1.1 Hunt Lane, Chadderton Now deleted Objection Premature to de-allocate this site - pre-judges the outcome of the, at the time of writing, current planning appeal into the refusal of Joint Case planning permission for housing development.

Hugh Broadbent Mill Barn, Denshaw Road, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5TL

1938/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1938/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1938/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1938/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 58 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1938/2/005/O NR3 Objection Objects to deletion of the phrase: "which improve energy efficiency and conservation".

Joan Broadbent 102 Edge Lane Road, Oldham, OL1 3RH

1417/2/001/O OE1.10 LGG8 Oldham Edge Objection Objects to removal of land from Local Green Gap 8. Should remain as Local Green Gap. Area is an accident black spot. (Map change ref Joint Case 11/28)

Broadhurst Engineering (UK) Ltd Agent : Medlock Group Moorhey Street, Oldham, OL4 1JU

0046/2/004/O B2.2 5.27 Objection Changes are unreasonable and contrary to national guidance. Reference to smaller dwellings is unduly restrictive. Fails to account Joint Case for regeneration benefits of using former employment land. Re-instate original clauses.

Mike Brogden 18 Church Road, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6EL

1006/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1006/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1006/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1006/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 59 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Alan Brooks Knarr Mill, Off Oldham Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5RQ

1007/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1007/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1007/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1007/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

E.L. Brooks 140 High Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BT

1009/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1009/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1009/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 60 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1009/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

John Brooks 58 Stoneswood Road, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5DY

1034/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1034/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1034/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1034/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Karen Brooks 5 Walkers Close, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6PJ

1008/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1008/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 61 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1008/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1008/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kathy Brooks 58 Stoneswood Road, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5DY

1035/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1035/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1035/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1035/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

E Brophy 39 Burnstall Grove, Royton, Oldham OL2 SRJ

1036/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 62 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1036/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1036/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1036/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Justin Brown 1 Intake Head, Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UT

1010/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1010/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1010/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1010/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

S Brownlee 23 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 63 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0914/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0914/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs Brown Hill Crest, Buckstones Road, Grains Bar, Oldham OL1 4SU

1011/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1011/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1011/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1011/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ms A.M. Brown 11 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SP

1012/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 64 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1012/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1012/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1012/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

H B Buckley 10 Lower Hay Lane, Mossley, OL5 9DE

0915/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0915/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

H Buckley 148 Wallhill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BL

1746/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1746/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 65 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1746/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1746/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J Buckley 9 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1846/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt / Local Green Gap designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft to safeguard from noise and traffic problems.

1846/2/002/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Mr M Buckley 42 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1841/2/001/O OE1.9 Objection Support de-allocation from Business and Industry but would rather the land be designated Local Green Gap and not Land Reserved for Joint Case Future Developoment in the interests of safeguarding the area from traffic impact.

Mr Mike Buckley 10 The Square, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AA

1016/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 66 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1016/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1016/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1016/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr V Buckley 42 Hebron street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1844/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry , but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Mrs Anne Buckley 18 King Street, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DQ

1014/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1014/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1014/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 67 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1014/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

R.H. Buckley 6 Moorgate, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DE

1015/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1015/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1015/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1015/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sam Buckley The Grange, Uppermill, Saddleworth

1037/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1037/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 68 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1037/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1037/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

L. Bulmer 8 West View, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TR

1017/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1017/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1017/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1017/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mark Burgin Shore Mill, Lawton Square, Delph OL3 5DT

1018/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 69 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1018/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1018/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1018/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Dr Burke Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o Messrs North Ainley Halliwell Solcitors, 34-36 Clegg Street, OLDHAM OL1 1PS

1824/2/001/S B1.3 M4 Huddersfield Road / Dunkerley Street, Oldham Support Support the mixed use allocation at Huddersfield Road District Centre

Mrs Irene Burke Flat 3, Ward Court, Ward Lane, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5LD

1019/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1019/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1019/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 70 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1019/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jimmy Burns 5 Browfield Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 6DE

0912/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0912/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Helen Burrill 7 Mount View, Den Lane, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6OB

1020/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1020/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1020/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1020/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 71 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr&Mrs B. Butterfield 24A Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0427/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0427/1/001/O

B Butterworth 277 Rochdale Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 5SX

0908/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage

0908/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Dr A. Butterworth 7 Duncote Grove, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LL

0218/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Objects to changed wording of Local Green Gap policy which could FD Ref: 0218/1/001/O allow development on site. Joint Case

0218/2/003/O OE1.10 Objection Objects to rewording of Local Green Gap policy which allows free development of all Green Gap areas in Borough. Joint Case

Mrs A Butterworth 23 Greencroft Meadow, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LQ

0224/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0224/1/001/O

Mrs E Butterworth 277 Rochdale Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 5SX

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 72 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0913/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0913/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs K Butterworth 15 Clifton Holm, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EZ

1022/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1022/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1022/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1022/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr B. Byram 37 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0063/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0063/1/001/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 73 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs J. Byram 37 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0087/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0087/1/001/O

Mrs L.M. Byram 136 High Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BT

1013/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1013/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1013/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1013/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr S Byrne 34 Elder Court, Huncoat, Accrington, Lancs BB5 6JP

1029/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 74 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1029/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1029/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1029/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sharon Byrne 18 Whitecroft Avenue, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8HY

1038/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1038/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1038/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1038/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Alice Byrom Lower Hill Top Farm, Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5RL

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 75 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1026/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1026/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1026/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1026/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

G Byrom Lower Hill Top Farm, Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5RL

1024/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1024/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1024/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 76 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1024/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

G A Bywater 9 Kinders Crescent, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JQ

1800/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites a food store development. Retail policy will not protect viability of local shops. A proposed food store will destroy existing Joint Case Greenfield shops and fabric of village. Remove reference to retail. Refurbish the mill.

P A Bywater 9 Kinders Crescent, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JQ

1808/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection The mixed use designation opens the way for a supermarket which would profoundly change Uppermill and Greenfield. Remove retail Joint Case element of the mixed use designation.

D. Cameron 24 Moorlands Caravan Park, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5UN

1048/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1048/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1048/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 77 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1048/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Martin Capper 11 Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

0748/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0748/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0748/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0748/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Janet Capper 51 Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5VW

1240/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1240/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 78 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1240/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1240/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Eirian Carruthers Tower House, Boarshurst Farm, Greenfield OL3 7EH

1039/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1039/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1039/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1039/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

A Cartledge 215 Turf Lane, Royton, Oldham OL2 6EX

0869/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 79 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0869/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J Cartledge 215 Turf Lane, Royton, Oldham OL2 6ET

0870/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0870/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr M. Cassidy 11 Longfield Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7HD

0469/2/002/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Mr Mark Cassin 21 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SB

1241/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1241/2/002/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 80 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1241/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1241/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

R Castle 9 Harrop Green, Diggle, Saddleworth OL3 5LW

0871/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0871/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

David Chadderton 7 Sharon Avenue, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4HP

0177/2/004/S OE2.2 Lydgate Tunnel, Disused railway line, Grasscroft Support Conditionally Withdraws. Map Change Number Ref: 11/18 FD Ref: 0177/1/003/O

0177/2/005/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0177/1/002/O

0177/2/006/S NR3.2 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0177/1/001/O Joint Case

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 81 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0177/2/007/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to the removal of the 500m cordon relating to distance a wind turbine development is from a sensitive existing land use. Joint Case Re-instate idea of a cordon, but increase to 1000m. Introduce a policy for energy saving in the Borough.

Andrew R Chadwick 32 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5VZ

0872/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0872/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs Chadwick 13 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EZ

0546/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0546/1/001/O

Chapman Saddleworth Ltd Agent : Chorlton Planning 10 Shade Avenue, Springhead, Oldham OL4 5SB

0123/2/004/O NR2.2 Victoria Works, Diggle Objection Objects to inclusion of site on the flood risk areas map.

Mrs B Chapman 36 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HA

1246/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 82 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1246/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1246/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1246/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr H Charles Broadgate Farm, Broadgate, Dobcross Ol3 5BJ

1248/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1248/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1248/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1248/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

1248/2/005/S OE1.10 Wall Hill Road Support Supports land at Wall Hill Road being designated as Local Green Gap. Will link to recreational route RR11.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 83 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1248/2/006/S OE2.2 Wall Hill Road Support Supports designation of land as Green Corridor and Link to provide link to recreational route RR11.

Chorlton Planning Owl Business Centre, High St, Lees, Oldham OL4 3BN

1820/2/001/O B2.1 PEZ22 Shaw Objection Map Change No. 7/4. Object to PEZ designation which is considered inappropriate and would restrict future re-development of the area. Remove PEZ designation and allocate as a mixed-use site or retain "permission for convenience retail" designation.

Andrew Clark 6 Hill End Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5JH

0527/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0527/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0527/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0527/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

C Clarke 28 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5GB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 84 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1257/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1257/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1257/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1257/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Janet Clarke 98 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

0873/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0873/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Ian Clarke 55 Church Lane, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6DY

1260/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 85 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1260/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1260/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1260/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jennifer Clark 6, Hill End Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5JA

0636/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0636/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0636/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0636/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Eric Clark 19 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 86 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1252/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1252/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1252/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1252/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs G Clark 8 High Street, Delph, Ol3 5DJ

0833/2/003/S B2.1 PEZ29 Delph New Road, Delph Support Partially withdraws. Still concerned about traffic impacts of FD Ref: 0833/1/001/O development on the A62.

Shirley Clayton 40 Delph Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RY

1042/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1042/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 87 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1042/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1042/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

John Cleary 120 Birch Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2QU

0874/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0874/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs D Clegg 130 Wallhill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BH

1261/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1261/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1261/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 88 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1261/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J Clemison 18 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QB

1041/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1041/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1041/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1041/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dawn Clynes 90 Park View, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0AJ

0881/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0881/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 89 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr & Ms Coates/Kerr 1 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1267/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1267/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1267/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1267/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

P.A. Coates 5 Lichfield Close, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SF

0659/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0659/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0659/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 90 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0659/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

C. Cochrane 12 Spring Vale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 6RU

0418/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Maintains support for the views originally projected by the FD Ref: 0418/1/001/O Cowlishaw Action Group

Paul Collinge 14 Ainley Wood, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5HL

1043/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1043/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1043/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1043/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Lisa Collins 42 Campania Street, Royton, Oldham OL2 6AP

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 91 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1044/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1044/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1044/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1044/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Frank Collins 18 Corbett Way, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SX

1268/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1268/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1268/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 92 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1268/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs K Collins 61 Henwood Road, Withinpton, Manchester M20 4XP

1046/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1046/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1046/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1046/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Julie Connell 3 Erica Avenue, Moorside, Oldham OL4 2TS

1270/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1270/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 93 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1270/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1270/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Jayne Connor 22 Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1269/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1269/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1269/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1269/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J Conway 1A rownlow Avenue, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1850/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt / Local Green Gap designation, not Land Reserved for Joint Case Future Development as in revised deposit draft to prevent harm to existing amenities.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 94 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Albert G Cook 41 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

1047/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1047/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1047/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1047/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M Cooke 93 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7JJ

1767/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mrs E Cooke 11 Cheviots Rd, Shaw, Oldham

1049/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 95 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1049/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1049/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1049/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs A Cook 41 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0070/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Wish to keep site as public open space to protect wooded area. FD Ref: 0070/1/001/O Joint Case

Andrew Cooney 20 Delph Lane, Delph, Saddleworth

1050/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1050/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1050/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 96 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1050/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Joanna Coop 6 Sycamore Cottages, Treetops Close, Saddleworth OL3 5BT

1272/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1272/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1272/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1272/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs M. Corbett Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o Steve Ingram Assocs, Design Studio, The Heights, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TU

0034/2/003/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0034/1/002/O Housing Introduction).

Barbara Cordwell 44 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 97 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0875/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0875/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Chris Cordwell 44 Alandale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

0876/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0876/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Marie Cordwell 44 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

0877/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0877/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Patrick Cordwell 44 Alandale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 98 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0878/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0878/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs E Cork 11 Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SX

0882/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0882/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J Cornel 34 King Street, Delph, Saddleworth

1271/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1271/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1271/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 99 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1271/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Susan Cotter 36 Thomas Street, Lees, Oldham OL4 5BU

1074/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1074/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1074/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Susan Cotter 36 Thomas Street, Lees, Oldham OL4 5BU

1075/2/001/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Country Posies 75 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JG

1801/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to the change due to traffic problems that would be created. A food store would destroy local shops. Remove all reference to retail Joint Case as part of the mixed use designation. Encourage retention of the mill.

Countryside Agency North West Region, 7th Floor, Bridgewater House, Whitworth Street, Manchester M1 6LT

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 100 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0008/2/034/S Original GS7 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy GS7. FD Ref: 0008/1/021/O

0008/2/035/S T2 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy GS5. FD Ref: 0008/1/020/O

0008/2/036/S Original GS3 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy GS3. FD Ref: 0008/1/019/O

0008/2/037/S OE1 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy GS2. FD Ref: 0008/1/018/O

0008/2/038/S Introduction Original 1.10 now deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft paragraph FD Ref: 0008/1/016/O 1.10.

0008/2/039/S GS0 2.3 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft paragraph 2.1 FD Ref: 0008/1/017/O (former General Strategy Section).

0008/2/040/S Introduction 1.21, 1.25 Support Conditionally withdraw objections to first deposit draft paragraphs FD Ref: 0008/1/015/O 1.12 and 1.13.

0008/2/041/S Original T1.2 Now deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.2 FD Ref: 0008/1/033/O (Local park and ride).

0008/2/042/W B0 Support Unconditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0008/1/009/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 101 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0008/2/043/S D1 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1. FD Ref: 0008/1/013/O

0008/2/044/S D1.1 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.1. FD Ref: 0008/1/014/O

R Cowen 116 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DB

1768/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mrs A.B. Cox 6 Glengarth, Uppermill, OLDHAM, OL3 6HU

1278/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1278/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1278/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1278/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Nicholas Cox 8 Saint Mary's Gate, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6AT

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 102 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1277/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1277/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1277/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1277/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Florence Coyne 11 Thomas Street, Lees, Oldham

1276/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1276/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1276/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 103 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1276/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Charlotte Craig 16 Treetops Close, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AS

1274/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1274/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1274/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1274/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Crompton & Royton Golf Club Highbarn, Royton, Oldham OL2 6RW

0560/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0560/1/001/O

Betty Crossley 66 Manley Road, Coppice, Oldham OL8 1AU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 104 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1076/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1076/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1076/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1076/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J.M Crossley 15 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EY

1275/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1275/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1275/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 105 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1275/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ben Crowther Woodside Farm, Cinder Hill Farm, Chadderton OL1 2SU

0883/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0883/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Denise Crowther Woodside Farm, Cinder Hill Lane, Oldham OL1 2SU

0884/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0884/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ian Crowther Woodside Farm, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton OL1 2SU

0885/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 106 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0885/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

John H Crowther 169 Chadderton Hall Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0QP

0888/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0888/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Pauline Crowther 169 Chadderton Hall Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0QP

0886/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0886/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ms Debbie Cummaford 27 Min-y-mor, Pwllheli, Gwynedd LL53 5AN

1949/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 107 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1949/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1949/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites

1949/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

H.J D'Adamo 10 Summer-hill View, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5TB

1281/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1281/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1281/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1281/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Andrew Dainty 2 Kinders Crescent, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JQ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 108 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1817/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Opposed to a food-retail development. Local shops are only marginally viable and their closure would ruin the character of the village. Remove reference to retail in the mix of uses. Residential, business and leisure uses are acceptable.

Claire Dainty 2 Kinders Crescent, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JG

1802/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy Joint Case existing Greenfield shops. Remove reference to retail or limit the size. Retain the mill.

Catherine Daly Apartment 10, Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton OL1 2TB

0890/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0890/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ged Daly Apartment 10, Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton OL1 2TB

0889/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0889/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 109 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr & Mrs Daniels 9 Higher Dale, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5HY

1282/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1282/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1282/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1282/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Scott Dargan 4 Slackcote Cottages, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TP

1283/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1283/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1283/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 110 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1283/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Elizabeth Dargen 4 Slackcote Cottages, Slackcote Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TP

1284/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1284/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1284/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1284/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Richard Darlington 1 The Woods, Grotton, OLDHAM OL4 4LP

1879/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection Wants the policy to have maximum flexibility for development of renewable energy sources of power incluidng water, wind, sun, geo-thermal, heat pumps, passive solar gain, methane extraction and biomass and new technologies.

1879/2/002/O T0 Objection Ensure the old railway tracks are preserved for level footways and for the future possibility of the reintroduction of rail transport in future generations.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 111 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1879/2/003/S NR3.2 Support Content for wind developments to be located in areas of the Borough that are less sensitive.

Mr Andrew Davies 11 Dale Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HY

1285/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1285/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1285/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1285/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Steven Davies 13 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

0892/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0892/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 112 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

T & I Davies 4 Higham Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 6TQ

0298/2/002/S OE1.10 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0298/1/001/O Joint Case

G W Davis 2 Top O'Th' Meadows, Strinesdale, Waterhead OL4 3SF

0891/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0891/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Yvonne Dawson 132, Wall Hill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BH

0824/2/002/S OE2.2 Wall Hill Road Support Supports designation of LGG15 as Green Corridor and Link Joint Case

0824/2/003/S OE1.10 Wall Hill Road Support Supports extension of LGG15 Joint Case

0824/2/004/S OE1.10 LGG15 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross Support Map Change Ref No. 11/6. Supports change. Joint Case

0824/2/005/S OE2.2 LGG15 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross Support Map Ref Change No. 11/17. Supports change. Joint Case

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 113 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

G Deakin 5 Broadgate, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BJ

1375/2/001/S OE1.10 Wall Hill Road Support Supports designation as Local Green Gap

Graham Dean 111 High Street, Uppermill, OLDHAM OL3 6BD

1803/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy existing Greenfield shops. Remove reference to retail or limit the size. Retain the mill.

Joan Dean 9 Lichfield Close, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SF

0660/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0660/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0660/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0660/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

B J Deaville 26 Cotswold Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5HD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 114 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0893/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0893/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

0893/2/003/O OE2.2 Land at Birchinlee Mill, Royton Objection Although supports the proposed changes to expand the boundary to protect the open land and habitat, the proposed boundary does not extend far enough.

Mr Howard Debble 13 Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SX

0894/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0894/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs A Delaney 29 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

0895/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0895/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 115 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Delph Community Association 28 Sevenacres, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HU

1777/2/001/S OE2.2 Wall Hill Road Support Supports designation as Green Corridor & Link (Map change 11/16)

1777/2/002/O GS0 2.3 f. Objection Delete the second and third sentences and replace with "Developments in the Green Belt will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances and the need to maintain the openness and visual amenity will be a priority."

1777/2/003/O Introduction 1.33 Objection Objects to the sentiments and wording of this paragraph. No-one is likely to read the plan as a whole but will use it for guidance on specific issues. The paragraph should be deleted and extensive cross-referencing provided throughout the plan.

1777/2/004/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1777/2/005/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1777/2/006/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1777/2/007/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

1777/2/008/O NR3.3 Objection The 10% target for renewable energy sources is not challenging enough. Increase the figure to 20%.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 116 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Denshaw Community Association Brown Hill Naze Farm, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SN

0543/2/018/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0543/2/019/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0543/2/020/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0543/2/021/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

0543/2/022/O NR3.2 d. Objection Objects to the deletion of criterion (d) of the original policy. Wants to have the distance threshold re-instated and increased to 1.5 km from houses and significant buildings.

Sue Devenney Linfitts House, 80 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EU

1286/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1286/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 117 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1286/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1286/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Cllr A.J. Dillon 'Loughglynn',, 5A Underwood Way, Oldham OL2 8LF

0481/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0481/1/001/O

0481/2/003/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to areas identified on the areas of search for wind developments map, particularly in Shaw. Concerned about impacts on skyline and aviation routes. Dunwood Park site concerned about highways and residential impacts.

Cllr P Dillon 'Loughglynn', 5A Underwood Way, Oldham OL2 8LF

0519/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0519/1/001/O

0519/2/003/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to sites indicated at Crompton Moor and the rear of Dunwood Park as they do not appear to meet the wind development criteria. Impacts of powerlines, flight path for Manchester Airport, as well as highway and residential effects.

Andrew P Dixon Holly House, Hollins Lane, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7NR

1903/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Areas of search map is misleading and does not add anything to the policy. Re-instate original point (d) from First Deposit. Amend map to exclude area between Greenfield and Peak District. Strengthen wording to offer more environmental protection

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 118 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1903/2/002/O NR3.1 13.77 Objection Policy criteria are not specific enough. Mention should be made of openness and visual amenity of Green Belt, nature conservation areas, historical/archaeological interests and view into/out of Peak District. Amend paragraph 13.77.

Daniel Dixon 164 Mossley Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4HA

1287/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1287/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1287/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1287/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Joanne Dobbs 1 Slackcote Cottages, Slackcote Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 STP

1077/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1077/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 119 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1077/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1077/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dobcross Village Community Spring Brow Farm, Ladcastle Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5QT

0105/2/009/O NR0 13.70 Objection Revised wording still does not quantify the contribution it is FD Ref: 0105/1/007/O envisaged Oldham could make to the NW Regional Assembly targets. Should include list of targets for Oldham's contribution to targets for each technology.

0105/2/010/O NR3.2 18.82 Objection Areas of search for wind developments map includes areas of FD Ref: 0105/1/008/O recognised landscape value including Castleshaw Valley, Diggle Joint Case Valley, land round Saddleworth Church and Dovestones. Exclude areas of recognised visual landscape value from the map.

0105/2/011/O NR3.2 13.88 Objection Policy wording is open to interpretation. Paragraph 13.88 appears incomplete. Amend wording of policy and reasoned justification.

Lucy Donkersley 7 Livingstone Street, Lees, Oldham

1288/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1288/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 120 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1288/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1288/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr M Donough 34 Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1289/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1289/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1289/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1289/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr F. Dowd 110 Manchester Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7DD

0549/2/002/W OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Unconditionally Withdrawn. FD Ref: 0549/1/001/O Joint Case

D Downes 28 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 121 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1845/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Margaret Downey 1 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UA

1291/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1291/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1291/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1291/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Brian Doyle Cartref, Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SB

1292/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1292/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 122 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1292/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1292/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Mark Dronsfield 31 Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7LD

0778/2/002/S H1.2 H1.2.12 Land at Shaw Hall Bank Rd, Greenfield Now Deleted Support Although deallocated from housing, would still like to see allocated FD Ref: 0778/1/001/O as a local green gap, as per original objection. Joint Case

Carol Drury Watersgate, Huddersfield Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5LX

1293/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1293/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1293/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1293/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sue Duty Barcroft House, Platt Lane, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5QD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 123 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1294/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1294/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1294/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1294/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ashley Dyer Thomas Barn, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1297/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1297/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1297/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 124 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1297/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Maris Dyer Thomas Barn, Millcroft, Delph OL3 5UX

1296/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1296/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1296/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1296/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Peter Dyer Thomas Barn, Millcroft Lane, Saddleworth OL3 5UX

1295/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1295/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 125 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1295/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1295/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Fiona Dyson 9 Saint Chads Cresent, Uppermill, Saddleworth

1298/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1298/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1298/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1298/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

S.& F. Eades 45 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0500/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0500/1/001/O

Joyce Earle 23 Dryclough Walk, Royton, Oldham OL2 6HD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 126 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0896/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0896/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J Early Hillside, Standedge Foot Road, Delph OL3 5LU

1299/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1299/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1299/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1299/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

S Early Hillstone, Standedge Foot Road, Delph OL3 5LU

1300/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 127 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1300/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1300/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1300/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J. & S. Earnshaw 29 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0563/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Object to any development of the area. Question the criteria in FD Ref: 0563/1/001/O policy OE1.10. Joint Case

E.M Easterby 2 Hawthorn View, Horest Lane, Denshaw OL3 5SU

1308/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1308/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1308/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 128 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1308/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Megan Eastwood 83 Church Road, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6DY

1301/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1301/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1301/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1301/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs E Eddison 43 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SS

0656/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0656/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 129 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0656/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0656/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

B.P. Edwards 36 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1866/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development Joint Case as in revised deposit draft in order to protect amenity and avoid traffic and other amenity problems.

Charles Edwards 23 Church Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7LQ

1079/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1079/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1079/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1079/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 130 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

M A Edwards 52 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

0897/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0897/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

S. Edwards 401 Old Walsall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham B42 1HX

1951/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1951/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1951/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1951/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

S Edwards 9 Moorland Avenue, Dobcross, Saddleworth

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 131 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1078/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1078/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1078/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1078/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr R Eglin Agent : Chorlton Planning

0621/2/003/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0621/1/002/O Housing Introduction).

Mr & Mrs Elliage Frierswood, Oldham Road, Denshaw OL3 5SW

1303/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1303/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 132 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1303/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1303/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs I. Ellis 33 Cowlishaw, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BX

0329/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0329/1/001/O

Elizabeth Elwell 24 Clifton Holm, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EZ

1305/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1305/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1305/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1305/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) Agent : Terence O'Rourke plc

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 133 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0726/2/003/S NR0 13.65 Support Welcomes reference to the DTI Energy White Paper and the CO2 reduction goals for 2020/2050.

0726/2/004/S NR3 13.72 Support Welcomes amendments to Policy that make a clear distinction between `energy efficiency` and `energy generation`. Welcomes amendments to paragraph 13.72 which encourages major developments to incorporate renewables.

0726/2/005/S NR3.1 Support Welcome deletion of original Policy NR3.1 and insertion of new policy NR3.1. Welcomes amendments to paragraphs 13.73-13.76 and insertion of paragraphs 13.77-13.80.

0726/2/006/S NR3.2 Support Welcomes amendments to Policy NR3.2 permitting wind developments and paragraphs 13.81 to 13.91. Also welcome deletion of supporting policy criteria c) to e).

0726/2/007/S NR3.3 Support Welcomes the inclusion of Policy NR3.3 and paragraphs 13.92 to 13.95.

Lucy England 11 Brantwood Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TF

0899/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0899/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr P England 11 Brantwood Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TF

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 134 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0900/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0900/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs J England 11 Brantwood Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TF

0898/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0898/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

English Nature Pier House, Wallgate, Wigan WN3 4AL

0149/2/021/S OE0 Support Changes meet original concern regarding management of features in FD Ref: 0149/1/019/O the landscape important to flora and fauna.

0149/2/022/S Original GS2 Now Deleted Support Concur that the protection of certain types of land from inappropriate development is now better covered by other policies in the revised deposit draft UDP, and therefore support the deletion of this policy.

0149/2/023/S OE2 Support Support for policy as it attaches significant value to protecting and enhancing biodiversity, features of geological interest, green corridors and tree cover, when considering development proposals.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 135 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0149/2/024/S OE2.3 Support The inclusion of a specific reference to the Rochdale canal cSAC is FD Ref: 0149/1/018/O supported.

0149/2/025/S OE2.4 Support The requirement for surveys and mitigation to be carried out on site FD Ref: 0149/1/020/O prior to granting planning permission has been addressed specifically by cross referencing to Policy D4 and OE2.3 in para 11.107 of Policy OE2.4.

0149/2/026/W T1.4 Support Unconditional withdrawal of objection to first deposit draft policy FD Ref: 0149/1/002/O T1.5, now revised deposit draft policy T1.4.

0149/2/027/S T1.4 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.5 FD Ref: 0149/1/001/O and paragraph 4.27, now revised deposit draft policy T1.4 (Canal Joint Case Corridors) and paragraph 4.26.

0149/2/028/S Original B1.4 Now Deleted Support Cross reference to habitat and species protection in Open FD Ref: 0149/1/007/O Environment policies is now included in paragraph 5.10 in respect of Joint Case the Rochdale Canal

0149/2/029/S NR4.3 Support English Natures welcomes and supports the addition of sub-paragraph (v) to Policy NR4.3(e) which refers to species protected by law and their habitats.

0149/2/030/W Original GS7 Now Deleted Support Unconditionally withdraws. (Moved to new Policy NR1.1) FD Ref: 0149/1/009/O Joint Case

0149/2/031/S OE2.3 Support Candidate Special Areas of Conservation (cSACs) are omitted from FD Ref: 0149/1/017/O Policy OE2.3. They should be included within the policy. Joint Case

0149/2/032/S W1.3 Support English Nature supports the inclusion of the protection for wildlife and geological sites, the protection of species and their habitats, and the biodiversity resource.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 136 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0149/2/033/S NR3.2 Support Conditionally withdraws. English Nature accepts that issues in FD Ref: 0149/1/012/O respect of the impacts that wind turbines may have on bird habitats Joint Case or migratory patterns are now addressed through cross reference to Policy NR3.1, and now supports Policy NR3.2.

0149/2/034/S OE2 Support English Nature strongly supports this policy as it attachs significant value to protecting and enhancing biodiversity, features of geological interest, green corridors and tree cover when considering development proposals.

0149/2/035/S D1.6 Support Welcomes and supports this policy requiring habitat creation to be incorporated into landscaping schemes, which should be integral to new development.

0149/2/036/S D1.5 Support Welcomes this policy which gives a good level of protection to existing trees from development, seeks adequate replanting of indigenous species for trees lost to development, and employs Section 106 Agreements to secure compensatory planting.

0149/2/037/S D1.4 Support Strongly support this policy. Welcome the onus placed on developers to demonstrate that adverse impacts have been avoided where possible, and adequately mitigated for where harm is unavoidable.

0149/2/038/S D1.1 Support Supports this policy, which seeks to ensure a range of benefits and safeguards to the nature conservation interests of the Borough through appropriate design considerations in all development.

English Partnerships Arpley House, 110 Birchwood Boulevard, Warrington WA3 7QH

1839/2/001/S GS0 2.11, Table 2.1 Support Table 2.1 is supported because it sets out the Council's monitoring regime. Monitoring will ensure that the delivery of new housing is controlled, thereby supporting housing market renewal.

1839/2/002/S GS0 2.10 Support Paragraph 2.10 highlights the importance of monitoring to ensure that delivery is controlled.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 137 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1839/2/003/S GS0 2.3 c. Support Paragraph 2.3 c. explains how the Housing Market Renewal Fund will sit alongside the delivery of housing through the planning system. Monitoring throughout the plan period will facilitate delivery.

1839/2/004/S Introduction 1.15 Support English Partnerships welcomes the correlation between the promotion of housing renewal and the promotion of sustainable communities, as outlined in paragraph 1.15.

1839/2/005/S Introduction 1.14 Support Welcome reference to improving the energy performance of dwellings through Housing Market Renewal. It reflects national planning guidance, sustainable construction ideas, & English Partnerships' commitment to best practice and improving standards.

1839/2/006/S Introduction 1.13 Support Welcome the Council's recognition that the Housing Market Renewal Fund will assist in significantly improving the Borough's housing stock.

1839/2/007/S H1 Support Supports proposed changes to this policy to take into account the increased emphasis of housing renewal. In particular it is noted that the proposed changes incorporate net clearance and aim to ensure that housing vacancies are reduced.

1839/2/008/S H1 6.05(i) Support Supports the addition of a reference to the Housing Market Renewal Fund in the objectives of the housing chapter.

1839/2/009/S H1 6.09 Support Supports the change which seeks to ensure that clearance replacement is not on a one to one basis, but is tailored to meet local demand.

1839/2/010/S H1 6.13 Support The paragraph is welcomed as it provides clarity to the policy.

1839/2/011/S H1 6.17 (d) Support The fact that the objectives and programmes of the Housing Market Renewal Fund have been integrated into planning propsals is welcomed. As such para. 6.17 (d) is supported.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 138 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1839/2/012/S H1.1 6.27 Support The potential influence of the housing market renewal fund on vacancy rates is clearly outlined.

1839/2/013/S H1 6.21 Support English Partnerships support the connection between the annual housing monitoring programme and the release of Phase 2 sites to assist the delivery of the objectives of the Housing Market Renewal Fund.

1839/2/014/S Appendix B Support The detail contained in Appendix B, particularly in relation to the identification of the Housing Market Renewal Areas and will strengthen the plan's objectives.

Julie Evans 90 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

0903/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0903/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr D Evans Racefield Farm, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton OL1 2SU

0902/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0902/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 139 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs D Evans Racefield Farm, Cinderhill Lane, Chadderton OL1 2SU

0901/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0901/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ms Ros Evans 1 Hawthorn View, Horest Lane, Denshaw OL3 5SU

1306/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1306/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1306/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1306/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

N R Evans 2 Lower Frenches Drive, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 140 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1806/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A supermarket is not acceptable. The main road is too congested already to cope with extra traffic. Local shops would suffer and the Joint Case quiet community would be destroyed. Housing, non-retail and leisure is acceptable.

Stuart Evans 90 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

0904/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0904/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Emma Ewart The Croft, Oldhey, Delph OL3 5UX

1307/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1307/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1307/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1307/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 141 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Exors of G S Sherratt deceased Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o North Ainley Halliwell Solicitors, 34/36 Clegg Street, Oldham OL1 1PS

0750/2/003/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0750/1/002/O Housing Introduction).

Dawn Fairclough 70 Carr Lane, GreenField, Oldham

1309/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1309/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1309/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1309/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr D Fairclough 27 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

0906/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 142 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0906/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs P R Fairclough 27 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

0907/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0907/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs J Fallows 82 Buckstones Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8DN

1080/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1080/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1080/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1080/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 143 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Sharon Fanning 18 Corbett Way, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SX

1310/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1310/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1310/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1310/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Katie Farrand 2 Armit Raod, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7LN

1311/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1311/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1311/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 144 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1311/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs E Farrar 5 Outram Mews, Buckley Wharf, Uppermill OL3 6BE

1312/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1312/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1312/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1312/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dan Faulkner 68 Edward Rd, Shaw,, Oldham OL2 7EY

0233/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0233/1/001/O

Miss K. Faulkner 1 Greenway, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7PY

0234/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0234/1/001/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 145 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr A. Faulkner 68 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0235/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0235/1/001/O

Mrs Beryl Faulkner 68 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0443/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0443/1/001/O

Mrs L.M. Fawns 37 Cowlishaw, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BX

0426/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0426/1/001/O

Mr Richard Filak 2A Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1313/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1313/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1313/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 146 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1313/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Ms Firth/Thomas Higher Slack farm, Heights Lane, Saddleworth OL3 5TU

1314/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1314/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1314/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1314/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr David Fish Oldfield Cottage, Denshaw Road, Delph OL3 5TS

1316/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1316/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 147 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1316/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1316/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Fish Oldfield Cottage, Denshaw Road, Delph OL3 5TS

1317/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1317/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1317/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1317/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Judith Fitton Ox Hey Farm, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5UB

1318/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 148 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1318/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1318/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1318/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Fitton Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o Strutt and Parker, 13 Princes Square, Harrogate HG1 1LW

0409/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Maintain original objection that land should be included within an FD Ref: 0409/1/001/O area where early development could be contemplated. Joint Case

0409/2/003/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Object to allocation as Local Green Gap. Previously designated as potential future development land, few sites for residential Joint Case development in this area, would still retain green gap between Shaw and Royton, greenfield sites still needed.

Sean Fitzpatrick 8 Dowry Road, Lees, Oldham OL4 3JZ

1319/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1319/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 149 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1319/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1319/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ernest Fleming 51 Bar Gap Road, Oldham, OL1 3RL

0800/2/003/S R1 Land at Malby Street, Oldham Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0800/1/002/O

Alan Fletcher 34 Burnedge Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EA

0588/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Local Green Gap designation could still permit small scale FD Ref: 0588/1/001/O development.

Mr Jake Fletcher 48 Hollins Avenue, Lees, Oldham OL4 3PQ

1320/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1320/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1320/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 150 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1320/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Fletchers Newsagent 125 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7JJ

1760/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Ms Susan Fogerty 8 Melrose Street, Derker, Oldham OL1 4DG

0926/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0926/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Carlo Fontanarosa 42 Sands Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0NU

0928/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0928/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 151 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr & Mrs Ford Hearthy Hill Farm, Oldham Road, Denshaw OL3 5RP

1321/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1321/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1321/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1321/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr R Ford 4 Westbury Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5BH

0929/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0929/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs M Ford 4 Westbury Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5BH

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 152 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0930/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0930/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mike Fox Grange School, Rochdale Road, Oldham OL9 6DY

1081/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1081/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1081/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1081/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ms Sheila France 3 York Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0PT

0931/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 153 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0931/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr D Frankland 4 The Sun Inn Mews, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5UN

1323/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1323/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1323/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1323/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

B.G Franklin Cale Hey Cottage, 3 Top O'th Meadows, Denshaw OL3 5SW

1322/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1322/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 154 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1322/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1322/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

H A Freear 1 Vicarage Way, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BA

0932/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0932/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Friends of the Wood 42 Montgomery Street, Hollinwood, Oldham OL8 3QA

0359/2/002/O B1.2 B1.2.6 Albert Street, Hollinwood Previously B.1.1.2 Objection This is the last piece of green land between Failsworth and FD Ref: 0359/1/001/O Hollinwood. It should be classified as either Recreational Open Joint Case Space or Local Green Gap.

Frost (Exors. of late Mr R.) Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o North Ainley Halliwell Solicitors, 34/36 Clegg Street, Oldham OL1 1PS

0167/2/005/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0167/1/004/O Housing Introduction).

Christina Frost 84 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 155 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1759/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

G & L Frost 24 Hebron Street, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1851/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Jenny Frost 2 Laureates Place, Woodbrook Farm, Springhead

1325/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1325/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1325/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1325/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Paul Fryer 28 Link Road, Springhead, Saddleworth OL4 4SF

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 156 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1330/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1330/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1330/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1330/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Karen Gallagher 58 Wellington Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7AQ

1758/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Ms Marta Gallastegui 1 Denbydale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TY

0933/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0933/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 157 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

C Gardner 25 Hutchins Lane, Watersheddings, Oldham OL4 2RF

0934/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage

0934/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Janet Gardner 55 Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3

1333/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1333/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1333/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1333/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Tony Gardner 55 Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, Oldham

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 158 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1332/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1332/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1332/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1332/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Barbara Garratt 37 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Lancs OL2 5UZ

0953/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0953/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

K Gartside 2 Brownhill Lane, Lower Brownhill, Uppermill OL3

1346/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 159 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1346/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1346/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1346/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Margaret Gartside 41 Nudger Green, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AW

1335/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1335/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1335/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1335/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs L Gartside Hollin Greave Farm, Holly Grove, Dobcross OL3 5JQ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 160 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1341/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1341/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1341/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1341/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

T Gaunt 3 Derwent Drive, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9JF

0684/2/002/O NR2.2 Objection The areas at risk of flooding shown on the map are not fully comprehensive. Joint Case

Mrs K Gay 3 Corbett Way, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SX

1082/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1082/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 161 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1082/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1082/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Barbara Geldart 30 Wood Street, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7NE

0956/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0956/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Malcolm Gelder 6 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0090/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Objection would only be resolved if no development, or new FD Ref: 0090/1/001/O buildings of any type, were permitted now or in the future. (Para Joint Case 11.53 11.54)

B Gibson The Dye House, 14 Corbett Way, Denshaw OL3 5SX

1350/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 162 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1350/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1350/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1350/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Carol Gibson The Dyehouse, 14 Corbett Way, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SX

1083/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1083/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1083/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1083/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr P Gidley 22 Chetwyn Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UJ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 163 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0957/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0957/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr S Gidley 22 Chetwyn Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UJ

0958/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0958/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

David Gilchrist 55 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1085/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1085/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1085/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 164 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1085/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Robert Gilligan Manor House Farm, Standedge, Delph OL3 5LU

1356/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1356/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1356/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1356/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Susan Gilligan Manor House Farm, Standedge, Delph OL3 5LU

1355/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1355/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 165 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1355/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1355/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Stuart Gill 18 Grains Bar, Oldham, Ol4 2JY

1353/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1353/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1353/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1353/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr John E Gilroy 11 Noon Sun Close, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7JA

1354/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 166 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1354/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1354/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1354/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Miss Janet Gipson 41 Montgomery Street, Hollinwood, Oldham OL8 3PR

0159/2/002/O B1.2 B1.1.2 Albert Street, Hollinwood Objection Do not want to see development on the site.

Mrs Joan Gipson 41 Montgomery Street, Hollinwood, Oldham OL8 3PR

0154/2/002/O B1.2 B1.1.2 Albert Street, Hollinwood Objection Do not want to see development on the site.

Mrs Julie Gittens 25 Hillside Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 6RF

0960/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0960/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 167 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

GL Hearn 230 Cygnet Court, Lakeside Drive, WARRINGTON WA1 1PD

1825/2/001/O S1 Dawn Mill, Shaw (Map Change No. 7/4) Objection Dawn Mill should be kept as a retail commitment and not designated as a PEZ site. Remove Dawn Mill from PEZ22.

Caroline Glennie 16 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0371/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0371/1/001/O

Walter Glennie 16 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0372/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0372/1/001/O

GMPTE 9 Portland Street, Piccadilly Gardens, Manchester M60 1HX

0026/2/035/O T3.3 4.55 Objection Object to inclusion of text at paragraph 4.55. Wording relating to park & ride should be included within the policy or as a separate policy. Appropriately developed P&R facilities can have a positive impact on car travel, congestion etc.

0026/2/021/S T1.5 4.30 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.6 FD Ref: 0026/1/001/O (Disused rail infrastructure) and paragraph 4.31, now revised deposit draft policy T1.5 and paragraph 4.30.

0026/2/022/W T1.1 b. Support Unconditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.1 FD Ref: 0026/1/003/O clause b.

0026/2/023/O Original T1.2 Now Deleted Objection Object to deletion of policy T1.2 relating to Local park and ride.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 168 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0026/2/024/S T0 4.1, 4.3 g. Support The amendments are supported as they add more clarity to the chapter with regard to the Council's position on the relationship between the location of new development and the transport network, better reflecting PPG13 and supporting the LTP.

0026/2/025/S T1.1 4.11 Support The amended paragraph is supported, as it better reflects the current position with regard to any potential railway station at Diggle.

0026/2/026/W T0 Park & Ride in Green Belt Support Unconditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0026/1/002/O

0026/2/027/W B1.2 B1.2.1 Southlink Business Park Support Unconditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0026/1/004/O Joint Case

0026/2/028/S B1.1 B1.1.31 Union Street West/Oldham Way, Oldham Now Moved to B1.2 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0026/1/005/O Joint Case

0026/2/029/S B1.2 B1.1.32 Oldham Way/Mumps, Oldham Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0026/1/006/O Joint Case

0026/2/030/S B1.2 5.14 B1.1.33 Primrose Street/Crossbank Street, Oldham Support Partially withdraws. FD Ref: 0026/1/007/O Joint Case

0026/2/031/S T2 Support Previous supports for Policy GS5 (reference 0026/1/008/S) and Policy GS6 (reference 0026/1/009/S) of First Deposit Draft have been transferred to Policy T2 of Revised Deposit Draft.

0026/2/032/S T3 Support Previous support (reference 0026/1/009/S) for Policy GS6 of First Deposit Draft has been transferred to Policy T3 of Revised Deposit Draft.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 169 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0026/2/033/S T3.1 4.44 Support Previous support (reference 0026/1/017/S) for Policy T2.3 of First Deposit Draft has been transferred to Policy T3.1 para 4.44 of Revised Deposit Draft.

0026/2/034/S T1.5 4.30 Support Supports the proposed change.

E Goddard 32 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1867/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft in the interests of amenities.

Mrs Godwin 56 Stoneswood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DY

1357/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1357/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1357/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1357/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

A Gorst White Rose Cottage, Heights Lane, Delph

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 170 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1358/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1358/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1358/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1358/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr F Gouldbourn 31 Fareholm, Royton, Oldham OL2 5BU

0961/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0961/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Government Office for the North West Sunley Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester M1 4BE

0021/2/061/S Original S1.2 Now deleted Support Conditionally Withdraws FD Ref: 0021/1/002/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 171 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0021/2/062/S S1.7 Support Conditionally Withdraws. But will be important that this policy is in FD Ref: 0021/1/003/O line with any modifications made to Policy S1.

0021/2/063/S Original S1.6 Now deleted Support Conditionally Withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/004/O

0021/2/064/S S1.7 Support Conditionally Withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/005/O

0021/2/065/S OE1.7 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0021/1/053/O

0021/2/066/S OE1.1 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0021/1/054/O

0021/2/067/S OE1.9 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0021/1/055/O

0021/2/068/O OE1.10 Objection Not appropriate to refer to green belt within a policy seeking to FD Ref: 0021/1/056/O protect non-green belt land. Gives wrong message about the protected status of that land. Delete ref. to green belt in (a) and set out development which would be permissible.

0021/2/069/S OE2.1 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0021/1/057/O

0021/2/070/S T0 4.4 Support Conditionally withdraw. FD Ref: 0021/1/021/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 172 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0021/2/071/S H2.3 Support Objection conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0021/1/052/O

0021/2/072/S H1.2 Support Conditionally withdraw. FD Ref: 0021/1/059/O

0021/2/073/S H1.1 Support Conditional withdraw. Note inconsistency in site capacity for site FD Ref: 0021/1/058/O ref. H1.1.21 between Phase 1 list of sites and site details in Appendix B.

0021/2/074/S H2.1 Support Objector wishes to maintain that part of their original objection FD Ref: 0021/1/051/O refering to the need to define "affordable" in line with Circular 6/98, but wishes to withdraw that part of the objection which sought clearer policy wording on eligibility criteria.

0021/2/075/O H1.3 Objection Changes to the first paragraph of the policy do not read correctly when read in conjunction with criterion (e) of the policy.

0021/2/076/S R2.1 10.61 Support Change is supported. The Policy recognises the need for open FD Ref: 0021/1/023/O space, sport and recreation facilties may vary with the type of development, for example sheltered dwellings.

0021/2/077/S Introduction Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0021/1/033/O

0021/2/078/S Original GS7 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdrawn FD Ref: 0021/1/031/O

0021/2/079/S T3 and T2 Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0021/1/030/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 173 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0021/2/080/O R2.1 Objection Formerly Policy R2.2, in new residential developments, open FD Ref: 0021/1/022/O space,sport and recreation facilities should only be required if as a result of the development, there results in a recognised deficiency in quality or quantity, not in every case as R2.1.

0021/2/081/S OE1 Support Conditionally withdrawn, subject to desire to see reference to Green FD Ref: 0021/1/029/O Belt removed from policy OE1.10 (formerly OE1.8 at first deposit). This is covered by a separate objection, reference 0021/1/056/O.

0021/2/082/S OE1 Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0021/1/028/O

0021/2/083/S Introduction 1.2 Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0021/1/020/O

0021/2/084/O R2.1 Objection Policy R2.1 seems to seek new provision (or commuted sum) in FD Ref: 0021/1/032/O every case regardless of there being a recognised local deficiency. It should be clear that the policy will only apply in cases of a recognised local deficiency.

0021/2/085/O R2.1 10.58 Objection New objection, in line with Circular 1/97, finances given to local authorities through development proposals under planning obligations should not be put in a general fund but should directly relate to individual proposals.

0021/2/086/S B1.2 5.13 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/027/O

0021/2/087/S Original B1.4 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/024/O

0021/2/088/S Original T1.2 Now deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.2. FD Ref: 0021/1/012/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 174 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0021/2/089/S T3.2 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T2.2, FD Ref: 0021/1/013/O now revised deposit policy T3.2.

0021/2/090/S T3.3 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T2.4, FD Ref: 0021/1/014/O now revised deposit policy reference T3.3.

0021/2/091/S T3.3 Original 4.48 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T2.4, FD Ref: 0021/1/015/O now revised deposit draft policy reference T3.3, first deposit draft paragraph number 4.48 (deleted at revised deposit).

0021/2/092/S T1.1 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.1. FD Ref: 0021/1/009/O

0021/2/093/S T1.1 4.12 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.1 FD Ref: 0021/1/010/O and paragraph 4.10.

0021/2/094/O NR3.3 13.95 Objection Paragraph 13.95 should be moved from the RJ to the end of the policy in order to recognise that exceptions may be appropriate in certain circumstances.

0021/2/095/S B1.5 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/025/O

0021/2/096/O B1.5 Objection In criterion a. the words "within urban areas" should be inserted after "...major public transport interchanges" in order to more closely reflect Policy EC8 of RPG.

0021/2/097/O B1.5 Objection The inclusion of the phrase "unless the applicant can justify an exception" should be deleted. Policy EC8 of RPG sets out the appraoch where capacity is not available in town or district centres and this should be reflected in Policy B1.5.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 175 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0021/2/098/O B1.5 Objection Criterion b. should reflect the sequential approach set out in RPG Policy DP1.

0021/2/099/S B2.3 Support Partially withdraws. The explanation of local circumstances which FD Ref: 0021/1/026/O justify allowing development not provided for in PPG2 is noted. However, further explanation is required as to what constitutes a significant increase in the developed area of the site

0021/2/100/S W1 Support Conditionally Withdrawn FD Ref: 0021/1/038/O

0021/2/101/S C1.3 Support Conditionally withdrawn FD Ref: 0021/1/039/O

0021/2/102/O D1.2 Objection Policy ought to include criteria which must be met if planning FD Ref: 0002/1/011/O permission is to be granted. (Supersedes objection ref. 0021/1/011/O to original policy D1.2 which has been deleted)

0021/2/103/S NR4.1 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/048/O

0021/2/104/S NR1.2 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/044/O

0021/2/105/O NR1.2 Objection There is a need for the types of development identified in the Air Quality Action Plan to be listed in either the reasoned justification or in a separate appendix. An appendix could set out the unacceptable levels of pollutants.

0021/2/106/S NR4.1 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0021/1/049/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 176 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0021/2/107/S NR4.2 13.102 Support Conditionally withdraws. (Was paragraph 13.74, now 13.102) FD Ref: 0021/1/050/O

0021/2/108/S Original NR3.1 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0021/1/045/O

0021/2/109/S CF1.2 Support Conditionally withdraw. FD Ref: 0021/1/034/O

0021/2/110/S CF1.3 Support Conditionally withdraw. FD Ref: 0021/1/035/O

0021/2/111/S CF1.4 Support Conditionally withdraw. FD Ref: 0021/1/036/O

0021/2/112/O CF1.5 9.18 Objection Inconsistency between the policy and its definition of "significant" residential developments (50 dwellings or 1.5 ha and above) and para. 9.18 of the justification (100 dwellings or 3 hectares and above).

0021/2/113/S D1.1 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to policy D1.1. FD Ref: 0021/1/016/O

0021/2/114/O D1.1 Objection The "etc." at the end of criterion b. in policy D1.1 should either be fully explained or deleted.

0021/2/115/S C1.7 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to C1.7. FD Ref: 0021/1/040/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 177 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0021/2/116/S C1.10 12.49 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy C1.10 and paragraph FD Ref: 0021/1/041/O 12.49.

0021/2/117/S C1.2 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy C1.2. FD Ref: 0021/1/042/O

0021/2/118/S D1.3 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.3. FD Ref: 0021/1/017/O

0021/2/119/S D1.6 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.6. FD Ref: 0021/1/018/O

0021/2/120/S D1.12 3.90 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.12 and paragraph FD Ref: 0021/1/019/O 3.75.(now 3.90)

0021/2/121/S TC1.4 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to policy TC1.4, which was policy FD Ref: 0021/1/007/O TC1.5 at first deposit stage.

0021/2/122/S TC1.5 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to policy TC1.5, which was policy FD Ref: 0021/1/008/O TC1.6 at first deposit.

R Grabowski 15 Leesbrook Park, Salem, Oldham OL4 3AZ

0140/2/002/S B2.1 PEZ17 Wellyhole Street, Lees Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0140/1/001/O

Matthew Graham 20 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5SZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 178 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0964/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0964/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Neil Graham 20 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5SZ

0963/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0963/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Shirley Graham 20 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham

0966/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0966/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Council Offices, Wellington Road,, ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, OL6 6DL

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 179 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0038/2/035/S OE2.3 11.94 Support Conditionally withdraws given proposed changes to Proposals Map FD Ref: 0038/1/005/O and changes to para. 11.94.

0038/2/036/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0038/1/003/O

0038/2/037/W H1.2 H1.2.4 Medlock Road, Woodhouses Objection SBI boundary has been amended and now does not impinge on the FD Ref: 0038/1/034/O site boundary.

0038/2/038/S OE1.10 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0038/1/006/O

0038/2/039/S OE2 Support Conditionally withdraws - Additions to part B of OE2 addresses FD Ref: 0038/1/011/O previous objection

0038/2/040/S OE2.4 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0038/1/026/O

0038/2/041/S OE2.3 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0038/1/025/O

0038/2/042/S OE1.10 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0038/1/021/O

0038/2/043/O R1 Objection Formerly under R1.1, the types of open spaces and facilities to be FD Ref: 0038/1/033/O protected are now listed in R1. Without particulary an additional category in Appendix E, the word 'urban' under R1 category B is inconstant with it and PPG 17.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 180 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0038/2/044/S OE1.2 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0038/1/021/O

0038/2/045/S OE1.1 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0038/1/018/O

0038/2/046/S B1 Support Given the changes to other policies (see 0038/1/004/O) and the FD Ref: 0038/1/007/O additional wording in paragraph 5.4 "there are circumstances where proposals for employment uses must be weighed against other UDP objectives..." the Unit withdraws its objection.

0038/2/047/S T1.5 Support Conditional withdrawal of objection to first deposit draft policy FD Ref: 0038/1/001/O T1.5, now revised deposit draft reference T1.4.

0038/2/048/O B1.1 5.10 B1.1.1 Tweedale Way, Hollinwood Objection Given the changes to Policy B1.4 it is difficult to relate these to the original objection. The addition of paragraph 5.10 is welcome, although as site B1.1.1 also appears to be adjacent to the Rochdale Canal it should be included in the paragraph.

0038/2/049/S NR2.3 Support The Unit supports Policy NR2.3.

0038/2/050/S NR2.1 Support The Unit supports Policy NR2.1

0038/2/051/S NR2 13.39 Support Conditionally withdraws. Given the change to paragraph 13.31 of FD Ref: 0038/1/028/O Policy NR2, the Unit withdraws its objection.

0038/2/052/S NR2.1 13.47 Support Inclusion of paragraph 13.47 welcomed. Changes to policies NR2.1 FD Ref: 0038/1/009/O and OE2.3 go a long way to addressing need for a specific policy relating to development adjacent Rochdale Canal, but SPG would still be helpful.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 181 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0038/2/053/S NR4.3 Support CW FD Ref: 0038/1/032/O

0038/2/054/S W1.3 Support CW FD Ref: 0038/1/027/O

0038/2/055/O NR3.1 Objection Unit previously supported Policy NR3.1, but now objects to the proposed changes, particularly the exclusion of "sites designated for their nature conservation value" from the list of criteria.

0038/2/056/O NR3.2 13.81 Objection Unit generally finds the proposed changes acceptable, but objects to deletion of words "and nature conservation" from paragraph 13.81 and objects to the inclusion of SBIs within the areas of search for wind development.

0038/2/057/S OE2 11.71 Support Welcomes changes to part 'B' of the policy and to para. 11.71

0038/2/058/S D1.12 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.12. FD Ref: 0038/1/002/O

0038/2/059/O D1.6 Objection Object to the inclusion of the wording "where appropriate" in policy D1.6, since landscape design should be an integral part of all new development. This objection supersedes support reference 0038/1/016/S.

0038/2/060/S D1.5 3.50 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.5 and paragraph FD Ref: 0038/1/015/O 3.50, which was paragraph 3.40 at first deposit stage.

0038/2/061/S D1.1 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.1, given the changes FD Ref: 0038/1/013/O to policy D1.1 criterion g.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 182 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0038/2/062/O D1.4 Objection Object to the inclusion of the words "insofar as is reasonably practicable", since it is unnecessary and weakens the policy.

0038/2/063/S D1.4 Support Conditionally withdraws objection and welcomes the change to D1.4 FD Ref: 0038/1/014/O to "features of substantive nature conservation value", and the changes to paragraphs 3.45, 3.47 and 3.48.

Greater Manchester Police, ALU Chester House, Boyer Street, Manchester M16 0RE

0270/2/002/O D1.7 3.68 Objection Support the change but require additional wording: "In the development of buildings to minimise the impact of crime, buildings should be designed to meet the standards of the Police Secured By Design award."

Andrew Greaves 6 West View, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TR

1087/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1087/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1087/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1087/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Elizabeth Green 1 Healds Green, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SP

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 183 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0968/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0968/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Gilbert Green 46 Arundel Close, Carbrook, Staybridge

1359/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1359/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1359/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1359/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Howard Greenwood 21 Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7LD

1804/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Change to include retail development within the mix threatens local shops and jobs. Remove the retail element of the mix. Joint Case

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 184 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

P.M Greenwood 57 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1093/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1093/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1093/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1093/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

R and B Greenwood 10 Spurn Lane, Diggle, OLDHAM OL3 5QP

1936/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1936/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1936/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 185 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1936/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Lionel Gregory 4 Racefield Hamlet, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton OL1 1TB

0974/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0974/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

0974/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Objects to lack of protection offered to birds in the Green Belt outside of designated nature conservation areas. Amend policy to offer protection to birds and other wildlife.

0974/2/004/O NR3.1 Objection Objects to the wording of the policy and the requirements placed upon developers. Amend policy to strengthen the requirements of the detailed statement. Applicants should be required to provide a map showing developments in proximity to proposals.

0974/2/005/S NR3 Support Supports the Council's aim to encourage renewable energy sources and its Policy NR3.

Mrs M Gregory 4 Racefield Hamlet, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

0969/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 186 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0969/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Rachel Grimshaw 13 Brocklehurst Street, Moston, Manchester M9 4WQ

1094/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1094/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1094/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1094/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Groundwork Oldham & Rochdale Environment Centre, Shaw Road, Higginshaw, Oldham OL1 4AW

0184/2/002/O T1.1 4.10 Derker Metrolink stop park and ride Objection Objects to the identification on the Proposals Map of a possible strategic park and ride site, associated with Derker Metrolink stop, Joint Case between the railway line and Shaw Road.

Mrs Asha Gulati 37 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EZ

0369/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0369/1/001/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 187 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Amanda Hadfield Running Hill House, Running Hill Lane, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5JS

1095/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1095/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1095/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1095/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

David Hadfield 12 Wharmton View, Hey Farm Estate, Greenfield, Oldham OL5 9DY

1811/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A supermarket development is not in keeping with the village and would result in squeezing out the local shops. Traffic congestion has Joint Case exceeded the infrastructure capacity. Remove the supermarket and permit smaller shops.

Dennis Hadfield Running Hill House, Running Hill Lane, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5JS

1096/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 188 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1096/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1096/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1096/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Eleanor Hague Cramond, 1 Range Lane, Denshaw

1901/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Object to wind farms. Joint petition submitted with Oliver Williams and signed by forty-six people.

H Hague 222 Rochdale Road, High Crompton, Shaw

0977/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0977/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

I Hague 5 Moorlands Park, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5UN

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 189 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1097/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1097/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1097/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1097/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

A & P Haines 21 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, OL2 6LU

1868/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development Joint Case as in revised deposit draft.

David O Haines Park Cottage, Beech Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EP

0776/2/002/S OE2.2 Lydgate Tunnel, Disused railway line, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0776/1/001/O Joint Case

Graham Halkyard 5 Wibsey Cottages, Ripponden Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SJ

1098/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 190 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1098/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1098/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1098/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Ms Hall & Masterson Moorbank, Ryefields Drive, Uppermill OL3 6BX

1361/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1361/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1361/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1361/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Fiona Hall 14 Edward Road, Shaw, OLDHAM, OL2 7EY

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 191 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0339/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0339/1/001/O

Mrs P.A Halliey 100 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BH

1367/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1367/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1367/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1367/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

N J Halliley 100 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BH

0734/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0734/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 192 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0734/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0734/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Messrs Halliwell & Douglas Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o Strutt and Parker, 13 Princes Square, Harrogate HG1 1LW

0169/2/003/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Object to de - allocation from Business and Industry to redesignation as Land Reserved for Future Development, due to uncertainty that this creates.

P Halliwell 12 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1368/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1368/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1368/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1368/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mary Hall Model Farm, Tame Lane, Denshaw Road

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 193 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1363/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1363/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1363/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1363/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr David Hall Cherry Clough Farm, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5UE

1362/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1362/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1362/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 194 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1362/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs M Hall 34 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

0978/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0978/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Norma Hall Boothstead Farm, Rochdale Road, Denshaw OL3 5UE

1364/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1364/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1364/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1364/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 195 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Stephen T Hall 11 North Rise, Greenfield, OLDHAM, OL3 7ED

1365/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1365/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1365/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1365/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

R.C. Hambleton The Coach House, Woodbrow, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SP

1099/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1099/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1099/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 196 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1099/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M. Hambley 34 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0482/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0482/1/001/O

Harry Hamer 66 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0212/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0212/1/001/O

Janet Hannah 26 Wellington Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7AQ

1770/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Joint Case Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Harry Hanson 639 Rochdale Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UY

0979/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0979/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 197 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr & Mrs K Hanson Marsh Farm, Rochdale Road, Denshaw OL3 5UE

1369/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1369/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1369/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1369/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Vera Hanson 639 Rochdale Road, Oldham, OL2 5UT

0982/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0982/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

E. Hardie 26 Sevenacres, Delph,, OLDHAM, OL3 5HU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 198 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1370/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1370/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1370/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1370/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

G Hardy 22 Hebron Street, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1853/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Mr I Hargreaves 23 Sevenacres, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HU

1371/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1371/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 199 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1371/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1371/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J & M Harratt 5 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SL

1100/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1100/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1100/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1100/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Imelda K Harris 24 Brookfield Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5PL

0985/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 200 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0985/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

James Harris 24 Brookfield Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5PL

0984/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0984/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

D.J.W Harrison 15 The Grove, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5RR

1372/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1372/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1372/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1372/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 201 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1372/2/005/O T1.5 4.30 Oldham Loop Line Objection The Oldham loop line between Werneth and Mumps should be protected for future heavy rail use.

1372/2/006/O B1.2 5.14 B1.2.3, B1.2.4 Objection Objects to the allocations for business use without measures being taken to protecting the rail corridors in expectation that a possible reversion to rail use, if Metrolink do not use it, will be required in the future.

M.J Harrison 20 Helmshore Avenue, Moorside, Oldham OL4 2QB

1373/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1373/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1373/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1373/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Pat Harrison 15 The Grove, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5RR

1374/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 202 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1374/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1374/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1374/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr K. Harrop 20 Dumfries Avenue, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SQ

0787/2/002/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0787/2/003/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0787/2/004/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0787/2/005/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs J. Harrop 20 Dumfries Avenue, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SQ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 203 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0786/2/002/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0786/2/003/O NR3.2 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0786/2/004/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0786/2/005/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Doreen Hartley 1 King Street, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5DL

1411/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1411/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1411/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 204 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1411/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

W.B Hartley 43 Pawn Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1405/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1405/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1405/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1405/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Stephen Hartwell 14 Winchester Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0RH

0986/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0986/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 205 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

J.A. Hassan 1 Brackenwood Drive, Cheadle, Cheshire SK8 1JX

0373/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0373/1/001/O

Pauline Hatzebruch 9 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QB

1412/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1412/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1412/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1412/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Rebecca Haworth 7 Victoria Street, Haslingden, Rossendale BB4 SDL

1101/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 206 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1101/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1101/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1101/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Anne Hayes 10 Edge View, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TR

0988/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0988/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Paul Hayes 28 Meadow Close, Hey Farm Estate, Mossley

1414/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1414/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 207 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1414/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1414/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Alan Headdock 17 Sparrowfield Close, Carrbrook, Stalybridge, Cheshire SK15 3NN

1416/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1416/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1416/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1416/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Paul Heaps 28a Woods Lane, Dobcross, Saddleworth

1418/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 208 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1418/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1418/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1418/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr&Mrs J. Heather 31 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0327/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0327/1/001/O

Mr T W Hebburn Apartment E, Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

0990/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0990/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs M Hebburn Apartment E, Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 209 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0989/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0989/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs J Henthorn Hey House Farm, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5UN

1419/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1419/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1419/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1419/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Lesley Heyes 74 Oldham Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4HU

1102/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 210 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1102/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1102/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1102/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Lynne Hey The Millhouse, Millwright Close, Marsden HD7 6EQ

1420/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1420/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1420/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1420/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs S Heywood 15 Travistock Drive, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0RQ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 211 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1421/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1421/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1421/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1421/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jimmy Hibbert 32 Park Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0AL

0991/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0991/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Paul Hicking Ladbrook House, Standedge Road, Diggle OL3 5QN

1422/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 212 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1422/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1422/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1422/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

David Hickling Ladbrook, Standedge Road, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5QN

1103/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1103/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1103/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1103/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Elizabeth Hicks Wellcroft, Bleak Hey Nook, Delph OL3 5LY

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 213 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1424/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1424/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1424/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1424/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Michael Higgins 76 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EU

1429/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1429/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1429/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 214 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1429/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Highways Agency Room 908, Sunley Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester M1 4BE

0006/2/019/S OE1.9 Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0006/1/018/O

0006/2/020/S Original S1.4.c) Now Deleted Support Conditionally Withdraws. FD Ref: 0006/1/001/O

0006/2/021/S H1.1 H1.1.1 Hunt Lane, Chadderton Now deleted Support In view of the recent detailed transport assessment undertaken for a housing development on the site in question the agency welcomes the removal of this allocation from the Plan.

0006/2/022/S B1.7 5.20 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0006/1/011/O

0006/2/023/S B2.2 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0006/1/012/O

0006/2/024/S GS0 Original 2.2 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdrawn objection to first deposit paragraph 2.2. FD Ref: 0006/1/013/O

0006/2/025/S T2 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit policy GS5. FD Ref: 0006/1/014/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 215 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0006/2/026/S T3 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit policy GS6. FD Ref: 0006/1/015/O

0006/2/027/S T3.1 4.38 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit paragraph 2.27 FD Ref: 0006/1/016/O under former policy GS6.

0006/2/028/S Original GS7 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft UDP policy FD Ref: 0006/1/017/O GS7.

0006/2/029/S T2.1 4.35,4.36 Support The increased emphasis placed on accessibility by a choice of transport means is welcomed.

0006/2/030/S T2 Support The increased emphasis now placed on accessibility by a choice of transport means, including walking and cycling, is welcomed.

0006/2/031/S T0 4.3 Support The increased emphasis now placed on accessibility by a choice of transport means is welcomed.

0006/2/032/S T3.2 4.47 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T2.2 FD Ref: 0006/1/007/O (Developments with significant transport implications) and paragraph 4.43, now revised deposit draft policy reference T3.2 and paragraph 4.47.

0006/2/033/S T1 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1 (the FD Ref: 0006/1/002/O transport network).

0006/2/034/S T1.1 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.1 FD Ref: 0006/1/003/O (transport infrastructure).

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 216 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0006/2/035/S T1.2 4.16 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.3 FD Ref: 0006/1/004/O (the road network) and paragraph 4.17, now revised deposit draft policy T1.2 and paragraph 4.16.

0006/2/036/S T3 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T2 FD Ref: 0006/1/005/O (transport and developments), now revised deposit draft policy T3.

0006/2/037/S T3.1 4.39 Support Partially withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T2.1 FD Ref: 0006/1/006/O (Access to new developments) paragraph 4.34, but wish to see references in revised deposit draft policy T3.1 paragraphs 4.38 and 4.39 amended from "DLTR" to "DTLR" (factual inaccuracy).

0006/2/038/S D1.11 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.11. FD Ref: 0006/1/008/O

0006/2/039/S D1.1 k) 3.16, 3.21 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.1 criterion k. and FD Ref: 0006/1/009/O paragraphs 3.15 and 3.20.

0006/2/040/S D1.9 Support Conditionally withdraws objection to policy D1.9. FD Ref: 0006/1/010/O

M.G. Hill 1 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EZ

0215/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Classify as Green Belt. If not, a loophole is provided through which FD Ref: 0215/1/001/O the already reduced areas may be eroded even further. Joint Case

Michael Hill 5 Ten Houses, Alt Lane, Oldham

1109/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 217 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1109/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1109/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1109/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Alan Hill 11 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UP

1431/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1431/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1431/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1431/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr C Hill 10 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SL

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 218 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1104/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1104/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1104/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1104/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Graham Hill Arbor Lodge, Ryefields Drive, Uppermill OL3 6BX

1430/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1430/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1430/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 219 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1430/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Michael Hilton 56 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0599/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally Withdraws. FD Ref: 0599/1/001/O

Pamela Hilton 56 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0068/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Land should never be used for building work. Revised policy falls FD Ref: 0068/1/001/O short of this.

Cllr Roger Hindle 9, Glaisdale, Clarksfield, Oldham Ol4 3AS

1822/2/001/S H1.1 H1.1.22 Vulcan Street, Oldham Support Supports the allocation of this site for residential development - an ideal opportunity for the land to be put to good use for the benefit of the people of Derker.

Mr John Hindle 25 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham

1432/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1432/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 220 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1432/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1432/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs J.L. Hindle Kirkdale, Rumbles Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EL

0690/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0690/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0690/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0690/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

0690/2/008/S H1.1 H1.1.15 Bailey Mill, Oldham Road Support Supports allocation for residential development - but as a conversion scheme for apartments and ground floor parking.

Angela Hirst 5 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, OL1 2TB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 221 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1107/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1107/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr John Hirst 85 Adelaide Road, Egerton, Stockport SK3 9LP

1117/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1117/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs J A Hirst 50 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DA

1787/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection No retail development is acceptable. Keep the mill.

Mrs J M Hobbs 8 Outram Mews, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BE

1434/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 222 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1434/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1434/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1434/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Michael Hobson 107 Lord Lane, Failsworth, Manchester M35 0RZ

1051/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1051/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

D. Hollins 40 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0826/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0826/1/001/O

Ms E. Holmes 4 Dumfries Avenue, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SQ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 223 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0793/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0793/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0793/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0793/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Holroy Developments 572 Middleton Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0HF

0126/2/004/O H1.2 H1.2.14 Sandy Mill, Royton Objection The site should be allocated for Phase 1 housing development. The site is available, strong local demand, the development would allow Joint Case affordable houses to be built, the site previously developed, clearance levels will be higher than estimated.

0126/2/007/O H1.1 Objection Reduction in supply within phase 1 gives only 2.5 years supply. Local authorities should provide at least 10 years. Council have overestimated the windfall supply and underestimated clearance. Should move most sustainable Phase 2 sites to Phase 1.

0126/2/008/O H1.2 Objection Reduction in supply within phase 1 gives only 2.5 years supply. Local authorities should provide at least 10 years. Council have overestimated the windfall supply and underestimated clearance. Should move most sustainable Phase 2 sites to Phase 1.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 224 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0126/2/009/O H1 6.13 Objection Unrealistic approach to properties which have been vacant for more than 6 months. These dwellings should count towards clearance

Holroy Developments Agent : Emery Planning Partnership Ltd 572 Middleton Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0HF

0126/2/005/O H1.1 H1.1.20 Rose Mill, Chadderton Objection Objects to the bringing forward of this site (from Phase 2 to Phase 1) when a more sustainable option is available at Parkside Farm (H1.2.1).

0126/2/006/O H1.1 H1.1.21 Springhey Mill, Huddersfield Road, Oldham Objection Objects to the bringing forward of this site (from Phase 2 to Phase 1) when a more sustainable option is available at Parkside Farm (H1.2.1).

Kristian Holt 1 Brantwood Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TF

1052/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1052/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr David Holt 1 Brantwood Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TF

1054/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1054/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 225 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs Lisa Holt 1 Brantwood Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TF

1053/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1053/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Moira Hope 15 Ainley Wood, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HL

1436/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1436/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1436/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1436/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Mike Hope 16 Station Road, Holmfirth, HD9 1AB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 226 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1435/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1435/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1435/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1435/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Roger P Hope 15 Ainley Wood, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HL

1437/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1437/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1437/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 227 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1437/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Mark Hopkins Slackfield Farm, Knott Hill Lane, Delph OL3 5DY

1438/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1438/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1438/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1438/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

F & W Hopkinson Hawthorn House, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BY

0522/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0522/1/001/O

Mr Edwin R Hopkinson 12 School Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6HB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 228 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1446/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1446/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1446/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1446/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ms B K Hopkinson 63 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham

1441/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1441/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1441/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 229 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1441/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

N.C Hopwood 10 Slackcote Cottages, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TW

1448/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1448/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1448/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1448/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Tony Horrocks 10 Verity Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 5DG

1055/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1055/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 230 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Pamela Houghton 10 Sevenacres, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HU

1449/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1449/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1449/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1449/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Barbara Howard Oxhey Farm, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5UB

1450/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1450/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1450/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 231 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1450/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D J Howard 1 Eagle Court, Denshaw Road, Delph OL3 5HN

1451/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1451/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1451/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1451/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Nick Howard 1 The Park, Greenfield, Saddleworth

1452/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1452/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 232 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1452/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1452/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Catherine Howard-Smith 217 Huddersfield Road, Diggle, Saddleworth OL3 5PQ

1453/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1453/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1453/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1453/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr S. Howarth Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o North Ainley Halliwell Solicitors, 34/36 Clegg Street, Oldham OL1 1PS

0095/2/002/O OE1.10 LR10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill Objection Objects to whole site being allocated as LGG. Whole of new LG16 should be allocated for residential development. Joint Case

Mrs Jane Howarth 23 Sam Road, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5PU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 233 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1454/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1454/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1454/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1454/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

John B Howcroft Ridings, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7NR

1816/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy Joint Case existing Greenfield shops. Remove reference to retail or limit the size. Retain the mill.

Mr Peter Howell 3 King Street, Delph, Oldham OL

1455/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1455/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 234 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1455/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1455/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jenny Hudson 24 Winsor Road, Leavenshulme, Manchester M19 2CB

1456/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1456/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1456/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1456/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Richard Hudson 24 Winsor Road, Leavenshulme, Manchester M19 2EB

1457/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 235 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1457/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1457/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1457/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Anne Hughes 4 Burnedge Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4DX

0058/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0058/1/001/O

B Hughes 40 Parkfield, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0AS

1056/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1056/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J Hughes 4 Carnforth Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9DN

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 236 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1057/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1057/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Nicola Hughes 130 Huddersfield Road, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5NU

1113/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1113/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1113/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1113/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Julie Hulme 36 Borrowdale Close, Royton, Oldham OL2 6TN

1115/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 237 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1115/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1115/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1115/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kenneth Hulme 28 Sevenacres, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HU

1121/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1121/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1121/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1121/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D J Hurst Wood Farm, Castleshaw, Delph OL3 5LZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 238 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1433/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1433/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1433/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1433/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J Hurst 43 Wellmeadow Lane, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DU

1459/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1459/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1459/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 239 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1459/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Alan Hurst 43 Wellmeadow Lane, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DU

1458/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1458/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1458/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1458/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr M.G Hurst 3 Lichfield Close, Denshaw, Oldham OL

1460/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1460/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 240 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1460/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1460/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

L Hussain 99 Belgrave Road, Hathershaw, Oldham OL8 1LT

1124/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1124/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1124/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1124/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Miss S.D Hutchinson 2 Hawthorn View, Horset Lane, Denshaw OL3 5SU

1461/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 241 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1461/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1461/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1461/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs B Hutchinson 52 Radcliffe Street, Royton, Oldham OL2 6QL

1059/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1059/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Robert Hykington Fair Banks Farm, Diggle Lee Cross, OLDHAM OL3 5JX

1935/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1935/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 242 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1935/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1935/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

V Hyncica Higher Broad Meadow Farm, Ox-Hey Lane, Denshaw OL3 5UB

1462/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1462/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1462/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1462/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ann Hynes 7 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1060/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 243 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1060/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Francis Ingham 35 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1061/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1061/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs Ingrame Printers Cottage, 30 Corbett Way, Denshaw OL3 5SX

1463/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1463/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1463/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1463/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 244 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr Moinul Islam 19 Raven Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 8PP

1128/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1128/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1128/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1128/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Hazel Ivell 4 Coverdale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UD

1062/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1062/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Stuart Ivell 4 Coverdale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 245 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1063/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1063/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J W Buckley High Street, Uppermill, Oldham

1776/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A large supermarket would destroy local shops. Only permit small size retail units.

J W Buckleys HIgh Street, Uppermill, Oldham

1775/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A large supermarket would destroy existing village shops. Wants only a small retail allowed on the site.

Barbara Jackson 18 Harrop Green, Diggle, Saddleworth OL3 5LW

1466/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1466/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1466/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 246 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1466/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Hedley Jackson 219 Rochdale Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7JD

1064/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1064/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J.M. Jackson 37 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0064/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0064/1/001/O

Keith Jackson 4 The Crescent, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BP

0357/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0357/1/001/O

M Jackson 45 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1065/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 247 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1065/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Neil Jackson 15 Chadderton Fold, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2RR

1066/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1066/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

P & B Jackson 11 Clifton Holm, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EZ

1465/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1465/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1465/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1465/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 248 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Susan Jackson 4 The Crescent, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BP

0358/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0358/1/001/O

Elizabeth Jacques 15 Lord Lane, Failsworth, Manchester M35 9GB

1129/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1129/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1129/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1129/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kate Jelen 66 Rochdale Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6QJ

1067/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 249 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1067/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Paul Jelton 66 Rochdale Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6QJ

1073/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1073/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Margaret Jepson 13 Ash Grove, Royton, Oldham OL2 6TJ

1072/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1072/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

John Saxon Ltd Agent : Chorlton Planning Friarmere Dell, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DF

0099/2/005/O B1.3 M2 Lumb Mill, Huddersfield Road, Delph Objection Objects to the restriction of residential development to 50% of the FD Ref: 0099/1/002/O net developable area. This is too low to justify the economic Joint Case development of the site. The percentage should be deleted.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 250 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0099/2/006/O H1.1 M2 Lumb Mill, Huddersfield Road, Delph Objection Revised capacity of 20 dwellings is too low to allow the economic development of the site. The capacity should be substantially Joint Case increased.

0099/2/007/O H2.1 M2 Lumb Mill, Huddersfield Road, Delph Objection Accepts the provision of affordable housing in principle, however, as with objection to policy H1.1, the site capacity should be Joint Case increased. The number is too low to allow for the economic development of the site and provision of affordable houses.

0099/2/008/O Appendix B M2 Lumb Mill, Huddersfield Road, Delph Objection Objects to the limit on housing development to 50% of the net total developable area. Also objects to the reference to an "out of date" planning brief for the site. Requests deletion of reference to 50% and the planning brief.

Marjorie Johnson 20 Dale Square, Royton, Oldham OL2 6PA

0561/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Objects to wording of revised LGG policy which could leave FD Ref: 0561/1/001/O loophole for some development of site.

Mr & Mrs S Johnson 12 Rochdale Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SE

1467/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1467/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1467/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 251 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1467/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr S Johnson 50 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1069/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1069/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

P Johnson 27 Tandelwood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1068/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1068/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Andy Jones 39 Tamworth Street, Werneth, Oldham OL9 7QY

1070/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 252 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1070/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Jack Jones 128 Fields New Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 8NH

1071/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1071/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Luke Jones 16 Claytons Close, Springhead, Oldham

1571/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1571/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1571/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1571/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 253 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Peter Jones 21 Heather Avenue, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8HL

0581/2/002/S R1 Oldham Way and Crompton Circuit Support Supports map change 10/2(a) showing correct route of Oldham Way FD Ref: 0581/1/001/O Recreational Route 3, and Crompton Circuit added to list shown as RR12, not listed in R1.2 of First Deposit Draft.

Stefanie Jones 6 Alderwood Fold, Lees, Oldham

1468/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1468/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1468/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1468/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr David Jowle 14 Buckley Drive, Denshaw, Oldham

1470/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 254 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1470/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1470/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1470/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kershaw Julie 16 Springwood, Delph, Oldham OL3 SHQ

1164/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1164/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1164/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1164/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr M.A Kadir 10 Palace Street, Oldham, OL9 6LA

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 255 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1163/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1163/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1163/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1163/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

David Kay 14 Chadderton Fold, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2PR

1086/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1086/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Michelle Kay 14 Chadderton Fold, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2RR

1088/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 256 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1088/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs Betty Kay 38 Springfield Lane, Royton, Oldham OL2 6XN

1084/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1084/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Peter Kay 7 St James Close, Thornham, OL16 4SJ

1089/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1089/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

W Kay 7 Wells Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0BB

1090/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 257 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1090/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Hadi Kazemi 51 The Parchments, Newton Le Wiilows, Merseyside WA1 2DX

1471/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1471/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1471/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1471/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dr S. Keba 62 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0081/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Land should be protected as Local Green Gap but objects to changes FD Ref: 0081/1/001/O to policy wording since First Deposit version

Anthony Keenan 42 AlandaleDrive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 258 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1091/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1091/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs K Keenan 42 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

1092/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1092/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr J Kennedy 49 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EY

1473/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1473/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1473/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 259 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1473/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr&Mrs R. Kennedy 12 Longfield Park, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BU

0305/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Maintain original objection to any building/development of the site. FD Ref: 0305/1/001/O Joint Case

Mrs S Kennedy Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EY

1476/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1476/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1476/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1476/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs J Kenny 22 Eagle Court, Denshaw Road, Delph OL3 5HN

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 260 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1478/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1478/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1478/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1478/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Kenny 17 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1479/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1479/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1479/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 261 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1479/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr H. Kenyon 26 Netherhouse Rd, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7HY

0428/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0428/1/001/O

Mr Paul Kenyon 15 Clifton Holm, Delph, Oldham

1481/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1481/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1481/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1481/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Elaine Kershaw 5 Haggate, Royton, Oldham OL2 5DU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 262 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1105/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1105/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs A Kershaw 3 Bagnel Close, Uppermill, Oldham

1484/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1484/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1484/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1484/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr A J Kershaw 3 Bagnall Close, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DW

1491/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 263 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1491/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1491/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1491/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sylvia Kershaw 1 Hill View, Delph, Oldham OL3 5JE

1488/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1488/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1488/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1488/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Tracy Kewn 22 Milton Street, Royton, Oldham OL2 6RD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 264 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1108/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1108/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

E Khadem 7 Haddon Road, Worsley, Manchester M28 2YP

1494/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1494/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1494/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1494/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Masood Khadem 10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6BX

1165/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 265 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1165/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1165/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1165/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Abraham Khadem 10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6BX

1496/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1496/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1496/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1496/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Victor Khadem 10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6BX

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 266 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1166/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1166/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1166/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1166/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Tahir Khan 9 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1110/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1110/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs H Kidd 50 Wellington Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7AQ

1771/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 267 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Gill Kilgour 4 Ladhill Lane, Greenfield, Oldham Ol3 7JW

1766/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mrs V A Killion 40 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1111/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1111/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr P Kilroy 140 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RP

1499/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1499/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1499/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 268 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1499/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr John W King Hanson House, Grains Road, Saddleworth OL3 5RM

1501/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1501/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1501/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1501/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

P A Kirk 22 Netherhey Street, Oldham, OL8 2BU

1112/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1112/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 269 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Kirstail Properties Agent : Chorlton Planning 32 Clegg Street, Oldham, OL1 1RW

0097/2/003/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0097/1/002/O Housing Introduction).

Rosanna Kitching 38 Grove Road, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6JL

1503/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1503/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1503/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1503/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Klynes Brothers Ltd Rose Mill, Coalshaw Green Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 8JT

0751/2/002/O H1.1 H1.1.20 Rose Mill, Chadderton Objection Welcomes allocation - phase 1 housing development. Objects to reduction in density. Requests that indicative density be increased to 40-50 dwellings per hectare & additional text stating that none of the sites have been subject to detailed appraisal

0751/2/003/S H1.2 H1.2.2 Rose Mill, Chadderton Now deleted Support Conditional withdrawal (although see new objection to indicative FD Ref: 0751/1/001/O capacity/density assumptions for this site).

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 270 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

June Knight 31 Linkside Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 6YZ

1114/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1114/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs K Knight 94 Wetherby Drive, Royton, OLDHAM OL2 5TA

1884/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to use of public leisure parks for wind turbines. Tandle Hill should not be considered suitable for such development as it was left Joint Case for the people of Oldham.

Robert Knight 2 Coverdale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UD

1116/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1116/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Samantha Knight 2 Coverdale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UD

1118/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 271 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1118/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Knoll Mill Campaign Group c/o 9 Steadway, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DY

0347/2/002/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Campaign Group opposes a supermarket and concerned about the FD Ref: 0347/1/001/O significant impact this would have on the character of the village. Allow a maximum unit size of 400 sqm for tourism-related developments. Limit retail to 10% of total development.

Ms J M Knott 51 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1504/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1504/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1504/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1504/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Cllr R. Knowles 4 Alphin Close, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7EB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 272 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1780/2/001/O OE1.8 11.43 Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Objection Replace 'unique' in subsection iii) with 'special site of sub regional importance', and correct reservoir name to 'Dove Stone'. (alternative wording suggested)

1780/2/002/O OE1.8 11.48 Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Objection Add statement about the 'hydraulically inadequate' sewers downstream of this site that would/might require enhancement by a developer of the site.

1780/2/003/O NR3.2 Objection Delete area of search map so that all proposals are judged by the same criteria. Criteria should be in line with other SCOSPA councils to protect landscape and population.

1780/2/004/O B1.3 Objection Mixed use developments must be protected from "cherry picking" by the developer by securing appropriate phasing arrangements as part of the grant of planning permission.

Mr &Mrs Kobyra 48 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0362/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0362/1/001/O

Mrs J. Korny 30 Longfield Park, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BU

0446/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0446/1/001/O

Dr M B Kostecky Holly Grove Farm Cottage, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5JW

1745/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 273 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1745/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1745/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1745/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Frances Kostecky Holly Grove Farm Cottage, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5JW

1744/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1744/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1744/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1744/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Maria Kostecky 12 Outram Mews, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BE

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 274 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1507/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1507/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1507/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1507/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Louise Kweal 43 Platt Lane, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AD

1511/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1511/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1511/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 275 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1511/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kelly L.A Cherry Top Farm, Rochdale Road, Denshaw OL3 5UE

1472/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1472/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1472/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1472/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Mathew Ladley The Paddock, Ambrose Cresent, Diggle OL

1512/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1512/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 276 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1512/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1512/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs. Lynda Laffin The Coach House, Woodbrow, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SP

1167/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1167/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1167/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1167/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Anita Lamb 1B Pickhill, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6BN

1513/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 277 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1513/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1513/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1513/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

H Lamb 1B Pickhill, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BN

1514/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1514/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1514/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1514/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

W & M Lamb 6 Lee Street, Uppermill, Saddleworth

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 278 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1515/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1515/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1515/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1515/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Martin Lancaster 32 Garnet Street, Derker, Oldham OL1 4BG

1168/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1168/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1168/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 279 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1168/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Andrew Langan 5 Denbydale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TJ

1119/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1119/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs A Langan 5 Denbydale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TJ

1122/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1122/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Paul Langan 5 Denbydale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TJ

1123/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 280 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1123/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

T Langan 5 Denbydale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TJ

1120/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1120/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Langtree Property Group Ltd Agent : Sedgwick Associates

0572/2/004/O H1 6.09-6.14 Objection (Now Wainhomes North West Ltd). Simplistic approach to housing clearance. Policy does not accord with Regional Planning Guidance. Should replace cleared dwellings on a one-to-one basis. Should still replace long term vacant dwellings.

0572/2/005/O Appendix B Objection (Now Wainhomes North West Ltd). Objects to the description of the site as having "relatively poor access to both local services and the bus network". Considers this misrepresents the site's suitability for housing compared with similar sites.

0572/2/006/O H1 6.27 Objection (Now Wainhomes North West Ltd). Objects to policy of counting re-occupation of long-term vacant dwellings against the RPG housing requirement. RPG does not suggest such an approach, & already takes account of reoccupation.

0572/2/007/O H1.1 6.23 Objection (Now Wainhomes North West Ltd). Use of SPG to defer the phased development of a site would be acceptable only in very restricted circumstances. Shouldn't be a vehicle to implement revised strategies emerging from Housing Mkt Renewal Fund..

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 281 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

H J Latimer 10 Wool Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5NS

1516/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1516/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1516/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1516/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D.W. Laws 39 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EZ

0489/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0489/1/001/O

Mr Mark Leaver 24 Stoneswood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DY

1518/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 282 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1518/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1518/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1518/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Alan Lee Westhill, 151 Rochdale Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7JT

1126/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1126/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Brian Lee Ryefields Lodge, High Street, Uppermill OL3 6BT

0160/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0160/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 283 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0160/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0160/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

0160/2/006/O OE1.10 LR10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill Objection Supports re-designation as LGG but objects to revised wording of policy Joint Case

Mr Joseph Leedham 8 Sevenacres, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HU

1519/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1519/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1519/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1519/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jennifer Lee Westhill, 151 Rochdale Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7JT

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 284 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1125/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1125/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ms R H Leeper Broadmeadow Farm, Slackcote Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1520/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1520/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1520/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1520/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Lees 33 Healds Green, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SP

1127/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 285 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1127/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

D Lees 33 Healds Green, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SP

1177/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1177/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Jack Lees 22 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HA

1171/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1171/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1171/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1171/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 286 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr A.H. Lees 31 Moor Street, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7BE

0452/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Maintains original objection - feels revised policy will allow FD Ref: 0452/1/001/O development. Joint Case

Mr J Lees Agent : Michael Courcier and Partners Park Farm, Walmersley, Bury BL9 5NP

0103/2/002/O H1 Objection The revised housing figure of 270 dwellings per annum is too low. Additional housing land should be allocated.

0103/2/003/O H1 Objection Housing clearance strategy unclear. Greater clarification needed to establish number of dwellings it will provide.If clearance programme involves greening older urban areas, or development of public open space, additional housing land required.

0103/2/004/O H1 6.13 Objection Innaccurate reflection of windfall development by including development of replacement dwellings on cleared sites. Unlikely that development of replacement dwellings on cleared sites will result in more dwellings. Cleared sites allowance needed.

0103/2/005/O H1.1 Objection No guarantee that additional sites listed will come forward during life of UDP. Some sites constrained by environmental issues; previously developed sites should come forward before greenfield allocations in H1.1 - therefore shortfall in provision.

0103/2/006/O H1.1 6.27 Objection Strategy for reoccupation of vacant dwellings is too vague. Reoccupation of vacant dwellings should not be counted against housing requirement, as this results in double counting. Additional housing land should be allocated.

0103/2/007/O H1.5 Objection Notion of achieving mix of housing types is supported. Threshold is too low, however. Policy should not apply to all sites. Greater emphasis should be given to providing housing for local needs, with threshold raised to 25 and sites of 1h or over.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 287 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0103/2/008/O H2.1 Objection Proposed changes do not account for local variations in affordable housing needs. Policy should be reworded to account for variations in local housing markets needs and trends.

0103/2/009/O H1.2 Objection Doubt as to whether additional sites will come forward.

0103/2/010/O H1.1 6.27 Objection Reoccupation of vacant dwellings should not be counted against the housing requirement as this would result in double counting against the Regional Planning Guidance requirement which already makes this provision.

Mr J Lees Agent : Chorlton Planning Wham Farm, Wham Lane, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5UA

0033/2/003/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0033/1/002/O Housing Introduction).

Mr M Lees 24 Kensington Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5YF

1150/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1150/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Peter R Lees 30 Princess Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7AZ

0388/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0388/1/001/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 288 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs Ann Lees 24 Kensington Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5YF

1172/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1172/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Lees-Newsome Ltd Agent : Chorlton Planning Ashley Mill, Ashley Street, OLDHAM OL9 6LS

1828/2/001/S B2.1 PEZ11 Busk, Chadderton Support Map Change Ref No. 5/20. The removal of the site from PEZ is supported. (Ashley Mill)

Mr Clinton Leggett 4 Brook Hill Close, Diggle, Saddleworth OL3 5NH

1521/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1521/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1521/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 289 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1521/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Ian Letham 45 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1522/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1522/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1522/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1522/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sandra Letham 45 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1523/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1523/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 290 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1523/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1523/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Anita Lilley 14 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BX

0161/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0161/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0161/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0161/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

P Lilley 14 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6BX

1524/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 291 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1524/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1524/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1524/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

R Lilley 14 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6BX

1525/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1525/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1525/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1525/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

S Lilley 14 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BX

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 292 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1526/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1526/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1526/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1526/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dorothy Lindley 18 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1527/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1527/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1527/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 293 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1527/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr G. Lindsay 391Shaw Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6NZ

0570/2/003/O R1 Luzley Brook allotments, Royton Objection These allotments, like others shown on the Proposals Map should FD Ref: 0570/1/002/O have equal status and it is still unclear as to their designation being distinguished from other recreation grounds.

0570/2/004/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection The change of wording is not acceptable. Wants Green Belt status FD Ref: 0570/1/001/O for the land. Joint Case

Mr David Litherland 21 Skipton Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 OQA

1148/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1148/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs J Littlewood 9 Hudderfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SD

1528/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 294 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1528/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1528/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1528/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs J Lomas 4 Dacres Drive, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7HP

1181/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1181/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1181/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1181/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Derek Lomax 76 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SP

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 295 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1529/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1529/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1529/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1529/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs S R Lomax 40 Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7LE

1893/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Supports the objectives set out in the policy, but objects to a loophole in the criteria that allows developments to be permitted Joint Case where the benefits of the development outweigh the benefits of conserving the landscape.

1893/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Policy is completely unacceptable for reasons relating to landscape, visibility, Green Belt and must have the loophole removed that may Joint Case permit . Areas of search for wind developments map is seriously flawed and must be redrawn.

London Law & Land Agent : Forge Architects 8/10 Lant Street, London, SE1 1QR

0294/2/003/S B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Support Welcome the mixed use designation.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 296 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs A.I. Long 24 Edward Rd, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0241/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0241/1/001/O

Lookers PLC Agent : Robert Turley Associates 776 Chester Road, Stretford, Manchester M32 0QH

0019/2/005/O B2.1 criterion (a) Objection Object to cross reference to Policy B1.5a. Many office occupiers may not want or be able to afford central locations. Apply a 1000 Joint Case sqm threshold before implementing the policy. Amend definition of "near a public interchange".

0019/2/006/O B1.5 Objection Criterion a. Object to cross reference to Policy B1.5a. Many office occupiers may not want or be able to afford central locations. Apply Joint Case a 1000 sqm threshold before implementing the policy. Amend definition of "near a public interchange".

0019/2/007/O B1.5 Objection Para 5.18. Object to cross reference to Policy B1.5a. Many office occupiers may not want or be able to afford central locations. Apply Joint Case a 1000 sqm threshold before implementing the policy. Amend definition of "near a public interchange".

Cllr Brian Lord 9 Fern Close, Springhead, Oldham OL4 4NS

0165/2/005/O NR3.3 Objection Considers 10% is not high enough. A realistic total which requires energy generation is required.

0165/2/006/O NR3.2 13.85 & 13.87 Objection Delete area of search map. Retain criteria d. but increase distance to at least half a mile. Retain last sentence in para 13.85. Para 13.87, and section generally, is too subjective. Should adopt similar policy to neighbouring authorities.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 297 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0165/2/007/O NR3.1 13.78 & 13.79 Objection Policy should require removal of concrete footings where these will damage environment.. Para 13.78 & 13.79 - use 'require' rather than 'expect'. Wording too subjective. Adopt similar approach to neighbouring authorities.

0165/2/008/O B2.2 criterion (c) Objection State terms. Often sites can be sold off in parts (eg mill building, other buildings, land etc).

0165/2/009/O H1.1 M1 Frenches Wharf/Wellington Road, Greenfield Objection Considers the indicative density to be too high and unlikely in Saddleworth.

0165/2/010/O B1.3 M2 Lumb Mill, Huddersfield Road, Delph Objection Objects to the deletion of the site's greenfield status.

Mr Paul Lowcock 82 High Street, Uppermill, OLDHAM OL3 6AX

1799/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy Joint Case existing Greenfield shops. Remove reference to retail or limit the size. Retain the mill.

E Lowe 1B Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1133/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1133/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Keith Lowe Agent : Power Supply Properties 6 Alton Close, Ashton Under Lyne, OL6 8XG

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 298 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0013/2/003/O B2.1 Objection Object to cross-reference to local needs shopping policy S2.3 in that FD Ref: 0013/1/002/O it makes this policy unduly restrictive. Local needs retailing may be Joint Case different in PEZs. Raise the threshold to 400 sqm and delete the cross-reference.

0013/2/004/O S2.3 Objection The local needs retailing threshold is too low and the new criteria (c) FD Ref: 0013/1/001/O and (d) are unduly restrictive. The threshold should relate to retail Joint Case floorspace and not gross floorspace. Increase threshold to 400 sqm.

Mr & Mrs P Lowe Causeway Sett Farm, Huddersfield Road, Delph Oldham

1533/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1533/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1533/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1533/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs L.S Lowe 8 Dacres Drive, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7HP

1184/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 299 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1184/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1184/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1184/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ms K Lowe 2 Delph Greave Barn, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TY

1530/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1530/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1530/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1530/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Maurice Lumb Ryefields Cottage, Ryefields Drive, Uppermill OL3 6BY

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 300 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1532/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1532/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1532/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1532/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs BJ Lund 5 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0299/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0299/1/001/O

Mr Howard Lunn 85 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

1534/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1534/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 301 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1534/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1534/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Tim Lynch The Beeches, Wall Hill, Dobcross OL3 5BN

1531/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1531/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1531/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1531/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Joan Macdonald 10 Church Road, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BH

1535/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 302 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1535/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1535/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1535/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M MacDonald 43 Park Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0AL

1134/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1134/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Dr&Mrs K S MacKenzie 64 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0591/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection The site has amenity and ecological value. The site is unsuitable on FD Ref: 0591/1/001/O geological and poor drainage grounds. Maintain full Local Green Gap status. (Para 11.53 & 11.54)

Lilian Maders Lowerfield Farm, Warren Lane, Oldham OL8 2HY

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 303 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1137/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1137/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Miss A. Maguire 10 Netherhouse Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EX

0245/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0245/1/001/O

Mr J Maguire 96 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

1139/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1139/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs D Maguire 96 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TA

1138/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 304 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1138/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr David Makin 11 Brook Lane, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5BQ

1536/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1536/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1536/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1536/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

1536/2/005/O Objection The 10% target for renewable energy sources is not challenging enough. Increase the figure to 20%.

Herbert Mallalieu 7 Ainley Wood, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HL

1185/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 305 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1185/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1185/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1185/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

B Manning 89 Fir Tree Avenue, Fitton Hill, Oldham OL8 2QS

1140/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1140/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Sally Marland 32 Grains Bar, Grains Bar, Oldham OL4 2JY

1537/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1537/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 306 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1537/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1537/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Anne Marrington 78 Fisher Street, Oldham, OL1 3RJ

0801/2/004/S R1 Land at Malby Street, Oldham Support Support change which sees land designated as recreational open FD Ref: 0801/1/002/O space. Joint Case

0801/2/005/O OE1.10 Land at Malby Street, Oldham Objection Maintain view that the land should be protected by local green gap FD Ref: 0801/1/001/O policy and object to the change which still does not include the site within the local green gap.

Alan Marsden 3 Lower Frenches Drive, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JD

1805/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mixed use designation opens way for a food store that is not supported locally, and which would attract shoppers away from Joint Case Oldham. Retain PEZ designation. Limit retail to local needs Encourage sports/leisure/business opportunities.

Mrs J Marsden 142 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RP

1541/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1541/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 307 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1541/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1541/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr D.C. Marshall 4 Broadgate, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BJ

0738/2/001/S OE1.10 Wall Hill Road Support Supports addition of land to LGG15 as Local Green Gap.

0738/2/002/S OE2.2 Wall Hill Road Support Supports designation as Green Corridor and Link to provide additional protection to LGG15

James S Marsh 20 Kidderminster Way, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0RJ

1143/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1143/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs Ivy Martindale 35 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SB

1538/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 308 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1538/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1538/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1538/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Michael Martin 5 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1144/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1144/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Haydn Mason 29 Alandale Drive, OLDHAM, OL2 5TU

1202/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1202/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 309 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Joan Mason 29 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

1146/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1146/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Karen Mather 19 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

0714/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0714/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0714/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0714/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Mather Highor House, Thurston Clough, Dobcross OL3 5RE

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 310 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1540/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1540/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1540/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1540/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Suzanne Mather Millstone Cottage, Horest Lane, Denshaw OL3 5SU

1543/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1543/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1543/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 311 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1543/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs L A Matthews 20 Lower Frenches Drive, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7JD

1757/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Sandra Mavro-Michaels 35 Armit Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7LN

1544/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1544/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1544/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1544/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Helen Mayall 7 Corbett Way, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5ST

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 312 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1545/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1545/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1545/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1545/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

V Mayall 7 Corbett Way, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SX

1186/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1186/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1186/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 313 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1186/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

K A Mayer Spring House Farm, Huddersfield Road, Delph OL

1546/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1546/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1546/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1546/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr/Mrs P J Mayhew 10 Brownlow Avenue, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LX

1856/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Local Green Gap designation merged onto adjacent, not Land Joint Case Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

J F Mc cann 31A Wool Road, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5NS

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 314 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1547/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1547/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1547/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1547/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Emily Mc clean 4 Brooklands Drive, Grotton, Oldham OL4 4LD

1548/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1548/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1548/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 315 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1548/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Margaret Mc clelland 3 West View, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5TR

1549/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1549/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1549/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1549/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Lauren Mc loughlin Glen Royd, Huddersfield Road, Delph OL

1550/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1550/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 316 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1550/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1550/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

McCarthy & Stone (Development) Ltd Homecliffe House, 26 - 32 Oxford Road, Bournemouth BH8 8EZ

0582/2/002/S R2.1 Support The development company supports the change / revised Policy, re - FD Ref: 0582/1/001/O numbered R2.1 from R2.2, which recognises that the need or requirement for open space / facilities will vary according to the type of development, for example sheltered dwellings.

Sue McDermott 18 Buckton Close, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5NE

1551/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1551/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1551/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1551/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 317 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Alison McDonal 2 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1151/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1151/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ben McDonal 2 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1152/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1152/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

D J McDonal 2 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1153/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1153/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr B McEwan 12 Ainley Wood, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HL

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 318 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1859/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1859/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1859/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally or regionally designated sites.

1859/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words 'views in or out' of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs M McEwan 12 Ainley Wood, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HL

1852/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1852/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1852/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally or regionally designated sites.

1852/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words 'views in or out' of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 319 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr Paul McGladdery Junction House, 2 Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5SH

1552/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1552/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1552/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1552/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sharon McGladdery Junction House, 2 Ripponden Road, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SH

1188/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1188/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1188/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 320 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1188/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dorothy McHugh 16 Hebron Street, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1854/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de -allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Miss Helen McKerracher 9 Waterside, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DP

1842/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to policy on wind farms, particularly their location in Saddleworth area or where the green belt would be violated.

Lilian McKown 17 Clipsley Cresent, Moorside, Oldham OL4 2TG

1553/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1553/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1553/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1553/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 321 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr Michael McKown 17 Clipsley Cresent, Moorside, Oldham OL4 2TG

1554/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1554/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1554/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1554/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Iris McLintock 6 New Tame, Tame Lane, Delph OL3 5TS

1556/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1556/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1556/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 322 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1556/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Malcolm McLintock 7 Dumfries Drive, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SG

1557/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1557/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1557/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1557/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Alec McLintock 6 New Tame, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TS

1555/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1555/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 323 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1555/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1555/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr J. McLintock Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o Steve Ingram Assoc Design Studio, The Heights, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TU

0650/2/003/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0650/1/002/O Housing Introduction).

Mrs Louise McMahon 2 Sun Inn Mews, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5UN

1559/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1559/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1559/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1559/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D. McNeeney 24 Chew Vale, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7EQ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 324 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0607/2/002/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy Joint Case existing Greenfield shops. Remove reference to retail or limit the size. Retain the mill.

K.A. McNeeney 24 Chew Vale, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7EQ

0608/2/002/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Retail element of the mix will displace activity to part of the village already under traffic pressure. Greenfield and Uppermill will merge. Joint Case Domination of a retail unit would change character of the village. Refer to the site as a green space.

Mr & Mrs McNeeney 24 Chew Vale, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7EQ

1737/2/001/O NR2.1 13.51 Objection Strengthen wording to require developers to contact United Utilities Plc to discuss the adequacy of the public sewerage network to accept flows generated by propsed developments and inform OMBC Planning Dept of the result.

Gavin McRae 1 Brookside Terrace, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EW

1191/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1191/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1191/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 325 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1191/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

E J McRonald Lyndale, 14 Moorlands Caravan Park, Denshaw OL3 5UN

1560/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1560/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1560/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1560/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Medlock Limited Agent : Robert Turley Associates Constance House, 5, Missouri Avenue, Salford M5 2NP

0617/2/004/O B2.2 5.27 Objection Changes are unreasonable and contrary to national guidance. Reference to smaller dwellings is unduly restrictive. Fails to account Joint Case for regeneration benefits of using former employment land. Re-instate original clauses.

David Mellor 25 Carlton Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne,

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 326 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1194/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1194/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1194/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1194/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Gaynor Mellor 8 Parklands, Royton, Oldham OL2 5YN

0955/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

0955/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr B. Mellor 35 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0510/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0510/1/001/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 327 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs P. Mellor 35 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0514/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0514/1/001/O

Meridian Development Company Ltd Agent : Inside Out Design Hollinwood Business Centre, Albert Street, Hollinwood, Oldham OL8 3QL

0251/2/004/O B1.2 B1.2.3 Union Street West/Oldham Way, Oldham Objection This is a key site on one of the main approaches to the Town Centre. FD Ref: 0251/1/001/O It is highly visible and a more flexible approach to uses for the site Joint Case needs to be taken. Reallocate the site for mixed use development.

0251/2/005/O B1.2 B1.2.5 Primrose Street/Crossbank Street, Oldham Previously B1.1.33 Objection Map Change Ref No. 5/11. This is a key site on one of the main FD Ref: 0251/1/002/O approaches to the Town Centre. It is highly visible and a more Joint Case flexible approach to uses for the site needs to be taken. Reallocate the site for mixed use development.

G &S Metcalf & Fletcher 37 Grains Road, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5DS

1561/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1561/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1561/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1561/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 328 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Jacqueline Miles Hey Farm, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1562/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1562/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1562/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1562/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Peter Miles Hey Farm, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1563/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1563/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1563/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 329 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1563/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jacqueline Milhench 3 Coverdale Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UD

1158/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1158/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Miller Crompton Limited Middlewood Court, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9SR

1156/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1156/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

A Miller 25, Hebron Street, Royton Oldham

1858/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designationand extension of Bullcote Park, not Land Joint Case Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft in interests of amenity .

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 330 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Alan Miller 6 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1154/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1154/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

L W Miller 6 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1155/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1155/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Beverley Mills 23 Lee Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6AE

1565/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1565/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 331 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1565/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1565/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

E & R Mills 4 Brownlow Avenue, Heyside , Royton, Oldham OL2 6LX

1860/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like the land merged into the existing adjacent Local Green Gap not Joint Case Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft for amenity reasons.

J S Mills 4 Edge End, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5QJ

1566/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1566/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1566/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1566/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 332 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs Betty Mills 1 Grosvenor Square, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6DG

1564/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1564/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1564/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1564/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Daniel Mistry Maple Lodge, Hartshed Street, Lees OL4 5EE

1567/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1567/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1567/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 333 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1567/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr N.P Mitchell 20 Ponyfield Close, Birkby, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

1403/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1403/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1403/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1403/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mobile Operators Association Agent : Mono Consultants Limited As agent's., ,

1945/2/001/S D1.12 3.87 3.90 Support Support the changes to these paragraphs, as they are minor in nature.

1945/2/002/S D1.12 Support Support the deletion of the imposition of a planning condition to remove redundant equipment, as this is covered under separate regulations.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 334 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1945/2/003/O D1.12 Objection Object to the addition to policy D1.12 criterion c. i) of the words "and, where it is established that there are no such locations;" because it replicates what criterion c. already says, is therefore unnecessary and makes the policy more cumbersome.

Asic Mohammed 3 Sun Inn Mews, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5UN

1568/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1568/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1568/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1568/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Carol Moir 11 Broadgate, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5BJ

1573/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1573/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 335 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1573/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1573/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J & E Mooney 3 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QB

1569/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1569/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1569/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1569/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Michael Mooney 4 Ashlea Grove, Grotton, Saddleworth

1198/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 336 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1198/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1198/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1198/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Steve Mooney 25 Hutchins Lane, Watersheddings, Oldham OL4 2RF

1161/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1161/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Andrew J Moores 3 Delph Slack Farm, Slackgate Farm, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1572/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1572/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 337 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1572/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1572/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D.R Moores 132 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RP

1574/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1574/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1574/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1574/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

C. Moorhouse 4 Delph Greaves, Delph, OLDHAM, OL3 5TY

1575/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 338 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1575/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1575/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1575/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr N Moorhouse 1 Fold Cottages, Woods Lane, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AU

1162/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1162/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

B Morgan 38 Birchinlee Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5EL

1160/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1160/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 339 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

C Morgan 3 The Stables, Frederick Street, Oldham OL8 4DA

1136/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1136/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs G Morris 13 Brownlow Avenue, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LX

1863/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but land the land should be merged into the adjacent Local Green Gap designation, Joint Case not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft, for amenity reasons.

John R C Moss Heys Cottage, off Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5RL

1941/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1941/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1941/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 340 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1941/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr E. Moss 13 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0071/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0071/1/001/O

D Mottley 135 Chadderton Hall Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0QP

1175/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1175/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr J Mottram 50 Chadderton Fold, Healds Green, Chadderton, Oldham OL1

1173/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1173/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Florence Mulholland 45 Huddersfield Road, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5NT

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 341 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1204/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1204/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1204/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1204/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Stuart Mullane 9 Waterside, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DP

1580/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1580/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1580/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 342 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1580/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs E Mullan 1 Corbett Way, Denshaw Vale, Denshaw OL3 5SX

1579/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1579/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1579/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1579/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

E Murphy 12 Halliwell Avenue, Hathershaw, Oldham OL8 3DL

1178/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1178/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 343 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

M Murphy 16 Gilderdale Close, Shaw, Oldham

1200/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1200/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1200/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1200/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs J Murphy 38 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1176/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1176/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Paul Murphy 8 Springfield Close, Failsworth, Manchester M35 0GB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 344 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1182/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1182/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ray Murphy 12 Halliwell Avenue, Hathershaw, Oldham OL8 3DL

1180/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1180/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

William Murray 6 Dumfries Drive, Denshaw, Saddleworth

1581/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1581/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1581/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 345 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1581/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Muskett 6 Walkers Close, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DJ

1582/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1582/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1582/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1582/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

John Mustoe 10 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QB

1583/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1583/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 346 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1583/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1583/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Georgina Myott 37 Walkers Lane, Springhead, Oldham OL4 4QD

1584/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1584/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1584/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1584/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M & B Naden 4 New Tame, Tame Lane, Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TS

1585/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 347 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1585/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1585/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1585/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ian Nadin 172 Middleton Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 5LS

0577/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Objects to policy which could permit any development on the site. FD Ref: 0577/1/001/O

National Grid Agent : Malcolm Judd and Partners National Grid House, Kirby Corner Road, Coventry CV4 8JY

0145/2/002/S B2.1 Support Conditionally withdraws. We would like to express our support for FD Ref: 0145/1/001/O the additional text added to paragraph 5.23. Joint Case

Mr G Nelson 134 High Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BT

1587/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1587/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 348 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1587/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1587/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Bessie Nelson 134 High Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BT

1586/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1586/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1586/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1586/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Linda Newman 23 Selham Close, Ifield, Crawley RH11 OEH

1205/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 349 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1205/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs D Newman The Cottage, Woodbrow Farm, Oldham Road, Denshaw OL3 5SP

1206/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1206/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1206/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1206/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sandra Lee Newman The Saddleworth Hotel, Huddersfield Road, Delph, Saddleworth, Oldham OL3 5LX

1588/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1588/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 350 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1588/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1588/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs P Newport 26 Skipton Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 OQA

1238/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1238/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Jane Newton 2 Dacres Drive, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7HP

1207/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1207/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1207/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 351 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1207/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Eppie Nicholls 3 Station Lane, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7EL

1590/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1590/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1590/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1590/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Harold Nield 3 Grosvenor Square, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DG

1589/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1589/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 352 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1589/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1589/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr D. Nield 20 Luzley Brook Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6SQ

0194/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0194/1/001/O

Mr & Mrs D Nolan 45 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1290/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1290/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1290/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1290/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

David Norbury 230 Broadway, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9JE

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 353 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1215/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1215/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

North Chadderton Social & Bowling Club Broadway, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0EL

1141/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1141/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

North West Regional Assembly North West Assembly House, Coops Building,, Dorning Street, Wigan WN1 1HJ

0740/2/038/S Original GS1 Now Deleted Support Support deletion.

0740/2/039/S Original GS2 Now Deleted Support Support deletion.

0740/2/040/S Original GS3 Now Deleted Support Support deletion.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 354 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0740/2/041/S Original GS4 Now Deleted Support Support deletion.

0740/2/042/S Original GS5 Now Deleted Support Support deletion.

0740/2/043/S Original GS6 Now Deleted Support Support deletion.

0740/2/044/S Original GS7 Now Deleted Support Support deletion.

0740/2/045/S D1 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/046/S T2 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/047/S B1 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/048/S B2 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/049/S H1 Support Support proposed changes.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 355 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0740/2/050/S S1 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/051/S TC1 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/052/S R1 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/053/S R2 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/054/S OE1 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/055/S OE2 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/056/S NR1 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/057/S NR2 Support Support proposed changes.

0740/2/058/S NR3 Support Support proposed changes.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 356 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0740/2/059/S W1 Support Support proposed changes.

D Norton 6 Hanover House, Royton, Oldham

1214/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1214/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Siobain O'Brien 72 Swift Road, Sholver, Oldham OL1 4QT

1208/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1208/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1208/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1208/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 357 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

William O'Brien Woodrow House, Oldham Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SP

1591/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1591/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1591/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1591/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs P O'Dwyer 1 Boarshurst Farm, Boarshurst Lane, Greenfield, Saddleworth OL3 7EA

1592/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1592/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1592/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 358 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1592/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M & E Ogden 12 Brownlow Avenue, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LX

1864/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but leave land as it is and merge it in with adjacent Local green Gap designation, not Joint Case Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Oldham Property Partnerships Agent : Alyn Nicholls & Associates c/o Agent, ,

1829/2/001/O B2.2 Objection The requirement for extensive marketing of former employment sites is unduly onerous and does not accord with emerging Government policy on supporting the delivery of new housing. Policy B2.2 should be deleted.

Derek T. Oldham 28 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0487/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Objects to any change to the land FD Ref: 0487/1/001/O Joint Case

Liz O'Neill 29 Goodwood Drive, Oldham,

1222/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1222/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 359 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Peter O'Neill 15 Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SX

1217/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1217/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

OPP Westhulme Limited Agent : Alyn Nicholls & Associates , ,

1837/2/001/O R1 Objection The Policy protects land presupposed to have amenity value, some of which may have little amenity value, and so protects at the expense of other policy objectives such as sustainability or regeneration.

1837/2/002/O R1.1 Objection The Policy protects land presupposed to have amenity value, some of which may have little amenity value, and so protects at the expense of other policy objectives such as sustainability or regeneration.

1837/2/003/O Appendix E Objection Appendix E presupposes land within the category "Amenity Greenspace" to have amenity value, some of which may have little amenity value.

Mrs Lynne Osbourne 2 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1593/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 360 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1593/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1593/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1593/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Oxley Threads Ltd Guide Mill, South Street, Ashton-u-Lyne OL7 0PJ

0261/2/006/O B2.1 Objection Objects to threshold restriction on leisure facilities. Joint Case

Oxley Threads Ltd Agent : Emery Planning Partnership Ltd Guide Mill, South Street, Ashton-u-Lyne OL7 0PJ

0261/2/004/O S2.4 Objection The 500 sq.m. limit on leisure facilities is too small. It does not assist in enabling the best use to be made of existing land and Joint Case buildings. Delete reference to a limit of 500 sq.m.

0261/2/005/O B2.2 Objection Policy is too restrictive. Floorspace threshold and marketing FD Ref: 0261/1/003/O requirements are unjustified. Range of uses is unspecified. UDP fails Joint Case to recognise that some buildings are unsuited for modern business operations.( 5.26-5.28)

P & D Northern Steels Ltd Agent : Chorlton Planning

0166/2/006/O OE1.10 LGG10 Shawside, Shaw (Moss Hey) Objection Map Change Ref No. 11/4. Object to the change in designation from FD Ref: 0166/1/002/O "Land Reserved for Future Development" to "Local Green Gap". Re-allocate the site for residential development.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 361 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Barbara Padgett 12 Annisfield Avenue, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DJ

1211/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1211/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1211/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1211/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dr A.L Parham Charity Farm, Millcroft Lane, Delph

1594/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1594/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1594/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 362 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1594/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Audrey Park 1 Pickhill, Uppermill, OLDHAM OL3 6BN

1798/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy Joint Case existing Greenfield shops. Remove reference to retail or limit the size. Retain the mill.

Mr K Parker 2 Alpine Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5HB

1242/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1242/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr & Mrs Parkin 'Four Winds' Brownhill, Off Oldham Road,, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SL

1210/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1210/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 363 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1210/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1210/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Barry Parkin 47 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0060/2/002/W OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Unconditionally Withdrawn. FD Ref: 0060/1/001/O Joint Case

Roger Parris 12A Alma Street, Eccles, Manchester M30 0EX

1244/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1244/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Richard Parslow 852 Ripponden Road, Oldham, OL4 2JZ

1595/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 364 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1595/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1595/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1595/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D Partington 11 Cecil Street, Royton, Oldham OL2 5NE

1243/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1243/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J & A Patterson

0702/2/003/S OE2.2 Land at Malby Street, Oldham Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0702/1/001/O Joint Case

0702/2/004/S R1 Land at Malby Street, Oldham Support Support land being added to recreational open space designation FD Ref: 0702/1/002/O

S Paulley 25 Clarksfield Street, Oldham, OL4 3AW

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 365 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1209/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1209/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1209/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1209/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs K Paxton 20 Rochdale Road, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SE

1596/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1596/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1596/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 366 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1596/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Peak District National Park Aldern House, Baslow Road, Bakewell, Derbyshire DE45 1AE

0036/2/007/O OE2 11.70 Objection Wording of policy does not adequately reflect the duty of authorities FD Ref: 0036/1/005/O to have regard to National Park purposes when undertaking work Joint Case which affects land in a National Park. (para 11.70)

0036/2/002/O OE2.1 11.75 Objection Wording of policy does not adequately reflect the duty of authorities to have regard to National Park purposes when undertaking work Joint Case which affects land in a National Park.

0036/2/009/S Introduction 1.25 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft paragraph FD Ref: 0036/1/002/O 1.13 (revised paragprah reference 1.25).

0036/2/010/S T0 4.4 i Support Unconditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft paragraph FD Ref: 0036/1/006/O 4.5 i., now revised draft paragraph 4.4 i.

0036/2/012/S T1.2 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.3 FD Ref: 0036/1/001/O and paragraph 4.16, now revised deposit draft policy T1.2 (The Road Network) and paragraph 4.15.

Joyce. I Pearson 44 Delph Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RY

1597/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 367 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1597/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1597/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1597/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dr A T Peel 210 Turf Lane, Oldham, OL2 6EU

1247/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1247/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J.M. Peel 72 Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EU

1598/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1598/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 368 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1598/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1598/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs M Peel 210 Turf Lane, Royton, Oldham OL2 6EU

1249/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1249/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J D Peet 132 Birch Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2QU

1250/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1250/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Joan Peet 130 Birch Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2QU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 369 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1251/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1251/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Louanne J Pellowe-Bailey 8 Park Lane, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DX

1756/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

John H Pellowe Dyehouse Cottage, 8 Higher Kinders, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7BH

1790/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Support the change, but the supermarket dominates. Shopping should reflect the tone of Greenfield. Joint Case

Cllr Val Pemberton 37 Princess Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7AZ

0468/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Policy may allow development in future - would like area to be FD Ref: 0468/1/001/O green belt. Joint Case

Andrew Pennington 2 Treetops Close, Dobcross, OLDHAM OL3 5AS

1883/2/001/S NR3.1 Support Supports the policy because of need to exploit alternative renewable energy sources.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 370 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1883/2/002/S NR3.2 Support Supports the policy because of need to exploit alternative renewable energy sources.

1883/2/003/S NR3.3 Support Supports the policy because of need to exploit alternative renewable energy sources.

Daniel Pennington 24 Rivington Road, Springhead, Oldham

1599/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1599/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1599/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1599/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ian B Perry Wellfield Cottage, 10 Pickhill Lane, Uppermill, Saddleworth

1601/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 371 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1601/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1601/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1601/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Imogen Perry Wellfield Cottage, 10 Pickhill Lane, Uppermill, Saddleworth

1600/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1600/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1600/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1600/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J.R Perry Wellfield Cottage, 10 Pickhill Lane, Uppermill, Saddleworth

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 372 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1602/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1602/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1602/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1602/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs I Pickering 3 Old Tame Cottage, Horest Lane, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5ST

1603/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1603/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1603/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 373 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1603/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs C Pickering 4 Healds Green, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SP

1253/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1253/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Alan Pickup 39 Wool Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5NS

1604/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1604/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1604/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1604/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 374 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs E Pickup 39 Wool Road, Dobcross, Saddleworth OL3 5NS

1605/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1605/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1605/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1605/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Paul Pilling 15 Thornham Lane, Slattocks, Middleton, Manchester M24 2RE

1254/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1254/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs A Plackett Deneholme, 147 Manchester Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7HJ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 375 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1606/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1606/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1606/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1606/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Miss M B Platt 6 Pickhill Lane, Uppermill, Saddleworth, Oldham

1607/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1607/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1607/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 376 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1607/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Miss T.M Platt 122 Broadway, Royton, Oldham OL2 5BP

1608/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1608/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1608/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1608/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs D Platt 55 Pennine View, Royton, Oldham OL2 6RT

1255/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1255/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 377 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Pamela Platt 84 Rishworth Rise, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7PZ

0440/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Local Green Gap policy does not provide real protection and could FD Ref: 0440/1/001/O allow area to be developed.

Lawrence Pleszak 18 Thornbank, Castle Lane, Carr Brook, Stalybridge SK15 3NZ

1889/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to wind developments on Denshaw / Castleshaw Moor due to visual impacts.

Delia Plunkett 70 Queensway, Greenfield, Saddleworth OL3 7AH

1609/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1609/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1609/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1609/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

David R Pollitt 52 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 378 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0593/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0593/1/001/O

Mr & Mrs Poole 17 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1610/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1610/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1610/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1610/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M.T Porisse Oaklands House, Oaklands Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4HN

1611/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1611/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 379 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1611/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1611/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D.J Potts 164 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BL

1615/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1615/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1615/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1615/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J Potts 164 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BL

1612/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 380 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1612/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1612/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1612/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Power Supply Properties Ltd 14 B Wynford Square, West Ashton Street, Salford M5 2SN

1873/2/001/O S2.3 Objection Criteria (c) and (d) are unduly restrictive by being so prescriptive and will not allow for any flexibility to reflect specific Joint Case circumstances. Delete criteria (c) and (d) from Policy S2.3.

1873/2/002/O B2.1 criterion (a) Objection Policy requires offices to be located in or adjoining to town or district centres or near major public transport interchanges. This may Joint Case preclude offices from PEZs. Delete reference to Policy B1.5 from criterion (a) of Policy B2.1.

1873/2/003/O B2.1 criterion (i) Objection Changes fail to account for fact that retailing needs may be different in PEZs and the need to apply sequential test within 400m fails to Joint Case take account that the site may be more sustainable. Reinstate original text.

Mary Power 1091 MiddletonRoad, Chadderton, Oldham

1256/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 381 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1256/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Norman Preece 27 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EZ

0252/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Land should remain green belt to protect from development FD Ref: 0252/1/001/O

Mr B.E Prescott 5 Leefields Close, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6LA

1613/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1613/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1613/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1613/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

P.J Preston 62 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 382 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1614/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1614/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1614/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1614/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr J Price 13 Healds Green, Chadderton, Oldham

1258/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1258/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Tony Price 41 Park Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0AL

1259/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 383 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1259/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr T Priestley 24 Serlby Road, Newthorpe, Nottingham NG16 3QD

1617/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1617/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1617/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1617/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs V Priestley 24 Selby Road, Newthorpe, Nottingham NG16 3QD

1618/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1618/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 384 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1618/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1618/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Keith Prior 70 Carr Lane, Greenfield, Saddleworth, Oldham

1619/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1619/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1619/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1619/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr&Mrs M. Pritchard 47 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0328/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0328/1/001/O Joint Case

Neil Pulman 61 Denshaw Road, Delph, Saddleworth, Oldham OL3 SLY

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 385 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1620/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1620/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1620/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1620/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sally Pulman Linfitts Cottage, Denshaw Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EU

1621/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1621/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1621/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 386 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1621/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs L Quinlan 26 Pierce Street, Watersheddings, Oldham OL1 4JH

1212/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1212/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1212/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1212/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J and M Quinn Dog Hill House, off Buckstones Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8LD

1882/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to areas of search for wind development identifying Shaw/Crompton Moor due to impacts on recreational activities, skyline, residential properties and wildlife. Redraw the Proposals Map.

Racefield Management Company Ltd c/o 4 Racefield Hamlet, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton OL1 2TB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 387 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1899/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1899/2/002/O OE2.3 Objection Objects to lack of protection offered to birds in the Green Belt outside of designated nature conservation areas. Amend policy to offer protection to birds and other wildlife.

1899/2/003/S NR3 Support Supports the Council's aim to encourage renewable energy sources and its Policy NR3.

1899/2/004/O NR3.1 Objection Objects to the wording of the policy and the requirements placed upon developers. Amend policy to strengthen the requirements of the detailed statement. Applicants should be required to provide a map showing developments in proximity to proposals.

1899/2/005/O NR3.2 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs L. Radcliffe 64 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham Ol2 7EY

0366/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0366/1/001/O

Elias Rahman 6 Lucerne Close, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9AF

1213/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 388 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1213/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1213/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1213/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Alaur Rahman 12 Villages Drive, Coppice, Oldham OL8 1ED

1216/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1216/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1216/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1216/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ramblers' Association 10 Pendle Close, BACUP, Lancashire OL13 9JT

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 389 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1900/2/001/O C1.1 Objection Re-insert the words "views in or out of". The setting of a conservation area would be seriously comprised by the presence of wind turbines.

1900/2/002/O NR3.1 13.77 Objection Specific mention should be made of the amenities that require protection. Protection should be afforded to views within and without the Peak District. Delete the last two sentences in paragraph 13.77.

1900/2/003/O NR3.2 13.86 Objection Areas of search map is misleading on suitability of development locations by ignoring other relevant factors, i.e. sensitivity of a site. Require 12 months wind readings. Offer protection to areas where birds hunt and feed. Amend policy and text.

1900/2/004/O OE2.3 Objection Offer protection to areas where birds hunt and feed. Amend policy and text.

Mr Alan Ramsbottom 18 Rochdale Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SE

1622/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1622/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1622/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1622/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 390 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr J Ramsbottom 110 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham

1262/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1262/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs S Ramsbottom 110 Wetherby Drive, Royton, Oldham

1263/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1263/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ransome Friarmere, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1623/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1623/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 391 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1623/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1623/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr M. Ratcliff 47A Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7LD

0767/2/002/S H1.2 H1.2.12 Land at Shaw Hall Bank Rd, Greenfield Now Deleted Support Conditionally Withdraw. FD Ref: 0767/1/001/O

Ravenstone Catering Services Waterside Mill, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7NH

1812/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection The site currently forms part of our customer base. The proposed mixed development would take away any expansion opportunities. Joint Case Develop the site for employment opportunities.

B & J Read 3 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0603/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Object to policy which would permit any building on the site. FD Ref: 0603/1/001/O Joint Case

Alan Reeves 27 Harewood Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TZ

1229/2/001/O NR3.2 Tandle Hills Country Park Objection Tandle Hills country park was bequeathed to people of Royton for leisure, not commercial uses. Wind development would disrupt Joint Case environment and distract drivers on A627(M). Reference map 13/18

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 392 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1229/2/002/O H1.2 Holden Fold Lane, Royton Objection Site boundary includes a pond which is a natural habitat. Pond has recently been reinstated followiing a previous housing Joint Case develompment and it would be foolish to allow it to be built on.

Regina A Reeves 27 Harewood Drive, Royton, OLDHAM OL2 5TZ

1881/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to wind farms. Joint Case

M.W Reid 33 Palin Wood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1219/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1219/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1219/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1219/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

A Rhodes 12 Calderdale Court, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TJ

1324/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 393 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1324/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Carol Rhodes 31 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1265/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1265/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

David Rhodes 3 Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1264/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1264/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

M Rhodes 12 Calderdale Court, Denbydale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TJ

1266/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 394 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1266/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Richardsons Commercial (Oldham) Ltd Agent : Chorlton Planning Greenacres Garage, Wellyhole Street, Oldham OL4 3BF

0133/2/003/S B2.1 PEZ17 Wellyhole Street, Lees Support Map Change No. 5/22. Support the addition of this land into PEZ17.

0133/2/004/O B2.1 PEZ17 Wellyhole Street, Lees Objection Map Change No. 5/22. Object to the removal of this land from FD Ref: 0133/1/001/O PEZ17.

Margaret Richbell 33 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1624/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1624/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1624/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1624/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

D Ridgeway 150 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5BL

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 395 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1627/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1627/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1627/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1627/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr R Ridout 14 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL

1625/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1625/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1625/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 396 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1625/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs P Riedlsperger 1 Gatehead House, Gatehead Lane, Delph

1220/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1220/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1220/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1220/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Rifle Range 372 Burnley Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2QP

1058/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1058/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 397 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

D.N&T.P. Rigby 90 Oldham Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4HU

0089/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Change does not address original objection. Further development on FD Ref: 0089/1/001/O Oldham Road will add to problems of congestion. Joint Case

Mr Chris Rigby 13 Clifton Holm, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EZ

1626/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1626/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1626/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1626/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

AT & AF Riley 24 Greenhill Avenue, High Crompton, OLDHAM OL2 7NZ

1897/2/001/O NR3.2 13.81 Crompton, Dunwood and Tandle Hill Objection Object to the removal of the phrase "and nature conservation". No reference is made to impacts on wildlife or habitat loss. Importance Joint Case of "no net loss of habitat" should be addressed when dealing with developments.

1897/2/002/O NR3.2 13.85 Objection Object to the removal of statements in paragraph 13.85, due to their removal allowing developers far too much freedom of action in Joint Case relation to the siting, scale and quantity of wind farms.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 398 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1897/2/003/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Object to lack of information on who will "weigh" the impact against the "desirability of producing energy from a clean, renewable Joint Case source". Decisions need to be made by independent body in consultation with nature conservation bodies and made public.

K Riley Grange School, Rochdale Road, Oldham

1223/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1223/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1223/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1223/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs V. Riley 284, Shaw Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6NZ

0814/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Do not want any development on site. FD Ref: 0814/1/001/O Joint Case

Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Agent : J10 Planning

0709/2/002/O R2.1 Objection An expectation for all contributions to be provided on site could thwart redevelopment given the amount of land that would be required on some sites. Some exceptions should be made.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 399 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0709/2/003/O H2.1 Objection With regards to criteria (b) and (c) the Council should provide an example of where this might be the case within the reasoned justification, i.e. tackling sites that are blighted. Policy should refer to "development appraisals".

0709/2/004/O B2.2 Objection Floorspace threshold is arbitrary. Delete phrase "which was originally designed as a dwelling". Re-instate six-month marketing test. Include reference to alternative uses if the premises have been empty a year. Add phrase "or for rent/lease".

0709/2/005/O NR2.2 Objection Chew Valley Flood Risk Area is based on a perceived threat; it should be based on known areas that have flooded or are at risk. The blanket approach may jeopardise redevelopment of blighted site. Policy is over cautious and reactive.

0709/2/006/O OE1.8 Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Objection Larger floorspace than the mill building is required for re-development purposes. Need to take account of other infrastructure on the site. "Net developable area" restriction and mix of uses are inappropriate. Residential development is wanted.

Hannah Roberts 28 Seven Acres, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HU

1628/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1628/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1628/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 400 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1628/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Karen Roberts Standedge Foot Farm, Delph, Oldham Ol3 5LU

1629/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1629/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1629/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1629/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kathryn M Roberts Brown Hill Naze Farm, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SN

1224/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1224/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 401 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1224/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1224/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Leslie Roberts Standedge Foot Farm, Delph, OL3 5LU

1632/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1632/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1632/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1632/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Richard Roberts Stonewood House, Oldham Road, Delph OL3 5EB

1631/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 402 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1631/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1631/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1631/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Brenda Robertson 2 Shawcroft Close, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7DA

0503/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0503/1/001/O

R Robertson 68 Chadderton Park Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0QB

1326/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1326/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

G Robinson 1 Halls Barn, Greenfield, Oldham OL

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 403 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1634/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1634/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1634/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1634/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Lindsey Robinson 1 Halls Barn, Greenfield, Oldham OL

1636/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1636/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1636/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 404 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1636/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Carl Robinson 1 Haus Barn, Greenfield, Saddleworth OL3 7BS

1630/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1630/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1630/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1630/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Darrin Robinson 44 Carr Lane, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7AX

1633/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1633/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 405 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1633/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1633/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr James Robinson 44 Carr Lane, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7AX

1635/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1635/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1635/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1635/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Natalie Robinson 48 Glen Grove, Royton, Oldham OL2 5SY

1225/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 406 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1225/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1225/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1225/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

P Robinson 1 Halls Barn, Greenfield, Oldham OL

1637/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1637/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1637/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1637/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Roche 83 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 407 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1638/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1638/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1638/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1638/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J D Roe 7 Leaside Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham

1327/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1327/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

John Roe 16 St Matthews Drive, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2RB

1329/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 408 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1329/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Kathy Roe 7 Leaside Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham

1328/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1328/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Pat Roe 16 St Matthews Drive, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2RB

1331/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1331/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Adam Rogers 15 Ripponden Road, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SH

1226/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 409 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1226/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1226/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1226/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Roland Bardsley Homes Ltd Agent : Bolton Emery Partnership Globe Square, Dukinfield,

0113/2/021/S Original D1.2 Now Deleted Original 3.24 Now Deleted Support Changes satisfy original objection. FD Ref: 0113/1/003/O

0113/2/022/S D1.5 Support Note changes proposed which are supported but comment that the FD Ref: 0113/1/002/O mechanism for providing trees elsewhere needs a better explanation. Joint Case

0113/2/024/S H2.1 Support Support changes, but feel that there is some dislocation between FD Ref: 0113/1/017/O criteria 1-3 and criteria (a) - (d). It appears that there is double testing proposed. The wording of the policy should be rationalised.

0113/2/025/O OE1.6 Objection PPG1 does not suggest that the condition of the property is relevant. FD Ref: 0113/1/018/O New para. 11.36 gives a misleading definition of "substantially intact Joint Case dwelling".

0113/2/027/S H1.3 Support Support changes but request reinstatement of some cross-referencing FD Ref: 0113/1/014/O to affordable housing. Joint Case

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 410 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0113/2/030/S H1.4 Support Conditional withdrawal. FD Ref: 0113/1/016/O

0113/2/031/W Original GS3 Now Deleted Support Unconditional withdrawal. FD Ref: 0113/1/011/O

0113/2/033/O GS0 2.4 Objection To have to wait for monitoring and partial alteration to the plan FD Ref: 0113/1/013/O could result in potential development sites remaining vacant contrary Joint Case to the advice in PPG1, PPG3, PPG4 and emerging reviews of the same. Roland Bardsley Homes Ltd Agent : Emery Planning Partnership Ltd Globe Square, Dukinfield,

0113/2/023/O B2.2 Objection Any current employment site must be assessed as to its contribution to the local economy. Policy even more restrictive than previously, Joint Case esp ctiterion (a). In respect of B2.2c question whether the Council has the expertise & may not be impartial.

0113/2/026/O R2.1 Objection Regarding requirement for on - site provision for larger residential developments, this should not be required if adequate provision, Joint Case even after completion of the development, is available adjacent to the development site.

0113/2/028/O R1 Objection Object to criterion (g) - urban farms can provide excellent redevelopment potential. Joint Case

0113/2/029/O OE1 11.8 Objection Objects to the policy being aimed at "predominantly undeveloped land" Joint Case

0113/2/032/S GS0 2.5 Support Supports proposed changes.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 411 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Steve Roman 8 Slackcote Cottages, Delph,, OLDHAM, OL3 5TW

1228/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1228/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1228/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1228/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dr S P Rothery Flat 21 Alexandra Mill, Uppermill, OLDHAM OL3 6NA

1880/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to land-based wind power schemes. Joint Case

Peter Rothery 24 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BX

1230/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 412 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1230/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1230/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1230/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Tom Rothery Treetops, North Rise, Greenfield OL3 7ED

1232/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1232/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1232/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1232/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Rothwell Woodbrow Farm, Oldham Road, Denshaw OL3 5SD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 413 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1234/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1234/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1234/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1234/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Alan Roughley Bowk House, Denshaw, OL3 5UN

0243/2/009/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0243/2/010/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0243/2/011/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 414 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0243/2/012/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

0243/2/013/O NR3 Objection Objects to removal of words "which improve energy efficiency and conservation" from policy. Energy saving would allow Council to stand up to Government pressure to install wind turbines which are seen as destructive and inefficient .

0243/2/014/O NR3.1 13.78 Objection Add to para 13.78 requirement for developers to pay 7.5% of sales income per year into trust fund to ensure site restoration can be financed at end of development's comercial life (in case of company going out of business).

0243/2/015/O NR3.2 13.88 Objection Add to para 13.88 requirement for developers to pay 7.5% of sales income per year into trust fund to ensure site restoration can be financed at end of development's comercial life. (in case of company going out of business)

0243/2/016/O NR3.1 13.79 Objection The Environmental Impact Assessment cannot be expected to give a balanced view on benefits of the scheme as it is paid for by the applicant and that is not its function. Role of SPG, is queried in relation to this issue.

0243/2/017/O NR3.1 13.77 Objection Remove para 13.77. Too complex and repetitive.

0243/2/018/O NR3.2 Objection Criteria d. should be restored, and distance increased to at least FD Ref: 0243/1/005/O 1500m to protect the quality of life of local residents. "express agreement of relevant parties" should be removed as they do not express the opinions of wider community.

0243/2/019/O NR3.2 13.81 Objection Restore phrase "and nature conservation" to protect sites designated for their special biological interest from damage which wind farm would cause.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 415 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0243/2/020/O NR3.2 13.82 Objection 13.82 should state that the applicant will be expected to have collected 12 months average wind speed data at proposed site using an anemometer of same height as pillar of proposed turbine. Average must exceed 7.5m/sec.

0243/2/021/O NR3.2 13.85 Objection Planning permission for pylons ancillary to turbines should be sought at the same time as the turbine application as they can themselves cause a major intrusion into green belt areas.

0243/2/022/O NR3.2 13.86 Objection Paragraph is meaningless - all its elements have been stated elsewhere. Council should not be commenting on the "desirability" of producing energy from renewable sources. Wind power unreliable - requires back up from other sources.

0243/2/023/O NR3.3 13.92/.94/.95. Objection Policy should allow the 10% equivalent to be saved by the installation of high levels of insulation in new developments. Could enable some developments to be viable compared to irregular energy production from renewables.

0243/2/024/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Delete para 13.87 - repetition of statements using slightly different wording weakens them.

0243/2/025/O T2.1 4.36 Objection Policy implies more housing development which goes against public FD Ref: 0243/1/002/O transport policy this section refers to. Although public transport is not good in parts of Saddleworth increased job opportunities would reduce need to travel.

0243/2/026/O NR3.2 13.82 Objection Withdraw areas of search maps as they are based on computerised estimates of wind speeds and take no account of the "valuable and sensitive" aspects of the environment. Smaller developments should also meet same criteria.

0243/2/027/O CF1.5 Objection SPG should be made open to public comment & published at the same time as the UDP. The policy still does not make it clear that sums should go to the nearest school as requested in the original objection.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 416 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs V Rudd 41 Wellmeadow Lane, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DU

1639/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1639/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1639/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1639/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Amy Runacre 29 Springwood Estate, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HQ

1236/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1236/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1236/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 417 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1236/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J & S Rushton 11 Brownlow Avenue, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LX

1865/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like land merging with adajcent Local Green Gap designation, not Land Joint Case Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Saddleworth Civic Trust 10 The Square, Dobcross, Saddleworth, Oldham OL3 5AA

0828/2/036/S OE1.10 LGG19 Ainsley Wood, Delph Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0828/1/002/O

0828/2/019/S OE1.10 Wall Hill Road Support Supports extension to LGG15

0828/2/020/S OE2.2 Wall Hill Road Support Supports proposed designation as green corridor and link

0828/2/021/S OE1.10 LR10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0828/1/005/O

0828/2/022/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0828/1/008/O

0828/2/023/S OE2.2 Lydgate Tunnel, Disused railway line, Grasscroft Support Supports designation as Green Corridor & Link

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 418 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0828/2/024/S OE2.2 Wall Hill Road Support Support designation as Green Corridor & Link

0828/2/025/O GS0 2.3 f. Objection The wording implies that the strong protection of the Green Belt may be relaxed in the case of certain developments. It should emphasise that development will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances. New wording suggested.

0828/2/026/O Introduction 1.33 Objection This paragraph should be deleted and extensive cross-referencing provided throughout the plan, as no one will read the entire document.

0828/2/027/W OE1.10 Land in vicinity of Prospect Farm Support Unconditionally withdraws - accept green belt designation. FD Ref: 0828/1/014/O

0828/2/028/O H1.1 H1.1.15 Bailey Mill, Oldham Road Objection As housing has been allowed on the adjacent land, the mill should be designated for mixed development & the route of the obsolete railway line designated a green corridor and link, recreation route or recreational open space.

0828/2/029/O C1.1 Objection Objects to the changes to the wording of policy C1.1, because the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to or in view of it.

0828/2/030/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0828/2/031/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 419 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0828/2/032/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0828/2/033/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

0828/2/034/O NR3.3 13.92-13.94 Objection The 10% target for renewable energy sources is not challenging enough. Increase the figure to 20%.

0828/2/035/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection As at first deposit stage, whilst not objecting to mixed use at the site, FD Ref: 0828/1/018/O this usage should be conditional upon maintaining the distinctive character of the site by retaining the bulk of the historic mill buildings.

Saddleworth Hotel Agent : Chorlton Planning Hudderfield Road, Delph, OLDHAM

1896/2/001/O NR3.2 Castleshaw Valley, Delph Objection Map Change Ref No. 13/18. Objects to inclusion of parts of the Castleshaw Valley map on the areas of search for wind developments map.

Saddleworth Parish Council Agent : Eagland Planning Associates Civic Hall, Lee Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6AE

0040/2/033/S OE1.10 LGG15 Wall Hill Road, Dobcross Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0040/1/009/O Joint Case

0040/2/018/S OE1.1 Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0040/1/006/O Joint Case

0040/2/019/S OE1.10 LR10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0040/1/015/O Joint Case

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 420 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0040/2/020/S OE2.2 Lydgate tunnel, Disused railway line, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0040/1/012/O Joint Case

0040/2/021/S OE1.10 LGG19 Ainsley Wood, Delph Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0040/1/011/O Joint Case

0040/2/022/S H1.2 H1.2.12 Land at Shaw Hall Bank Rd, Greenfield Now Deleted Support Conditional Withdrawl. FD Ref: 0040/1/016/O

0040/2/023/S B1.3 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0040/1/003/O Joint Case

0040/2/024/S B2.3 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0040/1/017/O Joint Case

0040/2/025/S Original T1.2 Now deleted Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.2 FD Ref: 0040/1/001/O (Local park and ride).

0040/2/026/S T1.5 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.6 FD Ref: 0040/1/002/O (Disused rail infrastructure), now revised deposit draft policy T1.5.

0040/2/027/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0040/1/008/O Joint Case

0040/2/028/S W1.3 Support CW FD Ref: 0040/1/004/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 421 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0040/2/029/S W1.4 14.2 Support CW FD Ref: 0040/1/005/O

0040/2/030/O NR3.1 Objection The policy should be absolutely clear in "requiring" wind developments to be accompanied by a detailed statement of Joint Case environmental effects.

0040/2/031/O NR3.2 Objection Partially maintains original objection, but objects to lack of detail FD Ref: 0040/1/014/O required for the environmental statement on noise and Joint Case historical/archaeological interests. Refer to visual amenity in Green Belt and require six months testing for wind resources.

0040/2/032/O NR3.3 Objection Objects that the policy only applies to major developments and not those of nine or fewer properties. Passive solar designs could be Joint Case applied to most forms of new development as a means of reducing reliance on wind developments in Saddleworth.

Ms K. Sage 27 Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7LD

0764/2/002/S H1.2 H1.2.12 Land at Shaw Hall Bank Rd, Greenfield Now Deleted Support Supports the change, but is concerned that the site may still be FD Ref: 0764/1/001/O developed in the future. Joint Case

Emma Salloway 128 Rochdale Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7SB

1398/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1398/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 422 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1398/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1398/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kim Salmon 3 Walkers Close, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DJ

1640/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1640/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1640/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1640/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Pauline Salmon 3 Walkers Close, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6DJ

1641/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 423 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1641/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1641/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1641/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Eric Saville 36 Harewood Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TZ

1334/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1334/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

James Saville 1 Kenton Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7ES

0449/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0449/1/001/O

Jon Saxon 9 Dacres Drive, Greenfield, Oldham

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 424 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1377/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1377/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1377/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1377/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Andrew Sayers 42 Chew Brook Drive, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7PD

1788/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection There is no need for a supermarket and there are no improvements for services for young people. Allow mixed business units and small Joint Case retail units to encourage new business opportunities. Tie any development planning gain in to youth facilities.

Liz Sayers 42 Chew Brook Drive, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7PD

1789/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection No retail at Frenches Wharf. Remove the reference to retail. Joint Case

Mr Stephen Scarsbrook 41 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 425 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1642/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1642/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1642/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1642/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Lesley Schofield 10 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL3 6BX

1379/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1379/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1379/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 426 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1379/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M Schofield Buckley Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BP

1643/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1643/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1643/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1643/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

C E Scholes Lockwood Hey Farm, Broad Lane Heights, Delph OL3 5TX

1645/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1645/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 427 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1645/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1645/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Christine Scholes 82 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

1644/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1644/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1644/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1644/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J M Scholes 42 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1336/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 428 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1336/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr David Scholes Lockwood Hay Farm, Broad Lane, Delph OL3 5TX

1646/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1646/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1646/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1646/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Paul Scholes 82 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

1378/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1378/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 429 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1378/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1378/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Timothy Scott 4 The Spinney, Scouthead, OLDHAM OL4 4BE

1809/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Not in favour of a supermarket and concerned about the traffic implications of any supermarket development.

Mr Simon Searles 40 Quail Street, Salem, Oldham OL4 5HD

1647/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1647/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1647/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1647/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr S.V. Sedgwick Ryefields, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BY

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 430 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0162/2/002/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0162/2/003/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0162/2/004/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0162/2/005/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Melissa Selkon 231 The Fairway, New Mosten, Manchester M40 3WA

1399/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1399/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1399/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 431 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1399/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Margaret Sellers Old Tame Cottage, Old Tame, Denshaw OL3 5SS

1648/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1648/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1648/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1648/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Nicola Semple 3 Fleet Street, Clarksfield, Oldham OL4 1NH

1649/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1649/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 432 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1649/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1649/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Derek Seville 10 Brownhill Lane, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 6BZ

1650/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1650/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1650/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1650/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Peter Sharpe 16 Oak View Road, Greenfield, Oldham Ol3 7EP

1755/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 433 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Patricia Sharp 70 Stonewood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DY

1651/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1651/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1651/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1651/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Robert Sharp 70 Stoneswood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DY

1652/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1652/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1652/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 434 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1652/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Shaw & Crompton Parish Council Council Offices, 23 High Street, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8RF

0042/2/005/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Welcomes Local Green Gap allocation but would like areas west and FD Ref: 0042/1/003/O south of Newbarn school, which have been wooded, to be allocated as recreational space.

0042/2/006/S R1 Crompton Circuit Support Support inclusion of Crompton Circuit in list of recreational routes, FD Ref: 0042/1/002/O previously omitted in draft Policy R1.1 in first deposit.

0042/2/007/S T1.1 4.13 Support Conditionally withdraw objection to first deposit draft policy T1.1 FD Ref: 0042/1/001/O (Transport Infrastructure) and paragraph 4.11, now revised deposit draft policy T1.1 and paragraph 4.13.

0042/2/008/O H1.2 H1.2.6 Lilac View Close Objection Proposed change (reduction in indicative capacity) does not meet FD Ref: 0042/1/004/O concerns - wishes the site to to be allocated as green belt.

0042/2/009/O CF1.5 Objection The Parish Council disagrees with the 50+ dwelling threshold before this policy is applied. The threshold should be 10 dwellings or more in line with other policies & take account of the cumulative impact of small infill and brownfield developments.

0042/2/010/S NR3.2 13.82 Support Parish Council has no objections to the areas of search in principle, however due to the location of the sites any developments would have to be undertaken very sensitively with particular regard to visual impact.

0042/2/011/O NR3.3 Objection Parish Council wants the target for renewable energy to be 20% and not 10%.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 435 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Carol L Shaw 47 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Saddleworth OL3 7NY

1754/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

David Shaw 4 Delph Slack Farm, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1380/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1380/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1380/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1380/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dorothy Shaw 6 Ryefields Drive, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BX

1654/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 436 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1654/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1654/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1654/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Felicity Shaw 4 Delph Slack Farm, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1657/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1657/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1657/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1657/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Shaw 3 Buckley Drive, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5RT

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 437 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1655/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1655/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1655/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1655/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Raymond Shaw 5 Delph Slack Farm, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1659/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1659/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1659/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 438 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1659/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs L A Shaw 13 Delph Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RY

1658/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1658/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1658/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1658/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Barbara C Sheard 56 Wellmeadow Lane, Uppermill, OLDHAM

1937/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1937/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 439 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1937/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1937/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

1937/2/005/O NR3.2,Map 13/18 Objection In considering the location of any proposed wind generators it is vital to consider the visual impact which will be evident from the Pennine Way. The preservation of its scenic integrity should be included in the Council's criteria.

David Shenton 4a New Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6AU

1782/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A major supermarket would close most small food retailers and the quality of life would suffer.

Mrs P Shepley 9 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1660/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1660/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1660/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 440 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1660/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Phillida Shipp 6 Dale Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HY

1661/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1661/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1661/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1661/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

1661/2/005/S NR3.3 Support Supports the addition of Policy NR3.3 as it is important to reduce CO2 output and the policy will help achieve that.

1661/2/006/O NR3.3 Objection Whilst supporting the purpose of this section, the percentage of energy requirements from renewable sources should be increased Joint Case from 10% to 25%.

M Simms 21 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 441 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1337/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1337/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

S Simms 21 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

1338/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1338/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Graham Sinclair 31 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SB

1381/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1381/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1381/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 442 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1381/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jean Sinclair 31 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SB

1662/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1662/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1662/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1662/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

G and K Slater Ferndown, Kinders Crescent, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7JQ

1797/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy existing Greenfield shops. Remove reference to retail or limit the size.

Annie Smith 22 Mill Street, Royton, Oldham OL2 5QW

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 443 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1339/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1339/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Becky Smith 47 Wellmeadow Lane, Uppermill, Saddleworth OL

1664/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1664/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1664/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1664/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Brian R. Smith 11 Beech Hill Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4DR

0595/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0595/1/001/O

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 444 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Harry Smith Hollinbank Cottage, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RP

1665/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1665/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1665/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1665/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kevin Smith 475 Burnley Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0BW

1340/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1340/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ms J L Smith 2 The Barracks, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5SR

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 445 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1663/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1663/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1663/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1663/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Somerfield Stores Ltd. Agent : Roger Tym and Partners Somerfield House, Whitchurch Lane, Bristol BS14 0TJ

0011/2/003/S S1 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0011/1/001/O Joint Case

0011/2/004/S Original S1.6 Now deleted Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0011/1/002/O Joint Case

John Southern 11 Netherhouse Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EX

0584/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0584/1/001/O

Ian South 137 Chew Valley Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7JN

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 446 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1769/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Robert Southwick 237 Dialstone Lane, Offerton, Stockport SK2 7LD

1382/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1382/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1382/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1382/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Barry Spence 86 Cathedral Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0RG

1342/2/002/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1342/2/001/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 447 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Howard Spinks 127 Denbydale Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TE

1345/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1345/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Sport England Astley House, Quay Street, Manchester M3 4AE

0495/2/036/S R1.3 Support New policy R1.3 explicitly supports protection of playing fields.

0495/2/034/O R1 Objection The policy could relate more closely to PPG17 typologies and indicate the different types of open space or facility on the Proposals Joint Case Map.

0495/2/014/S R0 Revised 10.7 Support Support change to wording in paragraph 10.5 of First Deposit, now FD Ref: 0495/1/012/O expressed in para 10.7 to give due regard to the term 'sport'.

0495/2/015/S R0 Revised 10.3 Support Support reference to 'sport', not refered to formerly in paragraph FD Ref: 0495/1/010/O 10.2 of First Deposit Draft

0495/2/016/S R2.1 Support The Policy (re -numbered from R2.2) now refers to the requirement FD Ref: 0495/1/009/O to provide sport facilities in addtion to open space and recreation facilities as a consequence of all residential development.

0495/2/017/S R2 Support Support amendment to Policy, making reference to 'sport' when FD Ref: 0495/1/007/O providing new and /or improving provison.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 448 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0495/2/018/S R2 Support The Policy now refers to 'sport' when refering to the requirement for FD Ref: 0495/1/008/O new and improved facilities through new developments.

0495/2/019/S R1.1 Support The deletion of paragragh 10.13 removes the potential for FD Ref: 0495/1/006/O incremental loss of playing fields.

0495/2/020/S R0 Revised 10.1 Support The introductory paragraph now makes reference to 'sport'. FD Ref: 0495/1/003/O

0495/2/021/S R0 Support Support change to title of Chapter to 'Open Space, Sport and FD Ref: 0495/1/002/O Recreation Facilities' from 'Recreation and Open Space', whcih gives due regard to sport, and relects PPG17.

0495/2/022/S R1 Original 10.9 Now Deleted, new text added Support Support deletion of paragraph 10.9 of the First Deposit Draft which FD Ref: 0495/1/011/O refers to targets based on national standards, no longer recommended by the Government in lieu of expected local standards of provisions as advised in PPG17.

0495/2/024/O R1.1 10.33 Objection In asessing whether replacement or improvement is most appropriate in lieu of facilites allowed for alternative uses, reference should be Joint Case made also to the Council's other existing strategies for guidance, eg Community and Greenspace Strategies.

0495/2/025/O R1.1 10.38 / 10.39 Objection Another exception should be added to the policy - that being where (The Council will permit the loss of a facility...provided that among Joint Case other things) one of the local strategies of the Council is in place that dictates otherwise.

0495/2/026/O R1.1 Objection The change does not include an exception to the Policy, that being that reference should be made to any other local strategies of the Joint Case Council to guide whether or not development will be permitted which would result in the loss of a facility.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 449 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0495/2/027/O R1.2 Objection Local strategies of the Council should also be referred to, to determine whether or not proposals for the the redevelopment or Joint Case change of use of buildings currently or most recently used for sport or recreation as in Policy R1, should be refused.

0495/2/028/O R1.3 Objection The new Policy does not make reference to the Council's Playing Pitch Strategy which should be referred to as an exception in Joint Case determining whether playing fields should be allowed for development for alternative uses.

0495/2/029/O R2 10.52 Objection Reference to 'sport' has been omitted, and should be referred to in the paragraph as it has been in the policy to which it relates, (Policy Joint Case R2).

0495/2/030/O R2.1 10.56 Objection Reference should be made to the Council's Greenspace Strategy as a guide when negotiating with developers on the requirement for new Joint Case or improved provision in new residential developments, as paragraph 10.58 does.

0495/2/031/O R2.1 Objection The amended policy does not make reference to new or improved provision arising from new residential developments being guided Joint Case by the findings of a local strategy or assessment.

0495/2/032/S R1.1 Support Policy now ensures replacement but size of it needs referring to and FD Ref: 0495/1/005/O reference to local strategies when replacement is involved to Joint Case compensate for the loss of open space.

0495/2/033/S R1 Support Policy R1 satisfies the original objection and includes the word sport FD Ref: 0495/1/004/O as requested. Joint Case

0495/2/035/S CF1.4 Support The change in emphasis directly relates to the proposed development.

Stafregent Limited Agent : Berg & Co. Sandy Mill, Royton, Oldham

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 450 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1819/2/001/O H1.2 H1.2.14 Sandy Mill, Royton Objection The site should be allocated for Phase 1 housing development. It is immediately available, in a poor state of repair, an eyesore and Joint Case detracts from the visual amenity of the area. There are no other phase 1 allocations in Royton.

Susan Stahr 10 Cavendish Way, Royton, Oldham OL2 5DQ

1347/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1347/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Standeaven Trading Ltd Agent : Medlock Group 19B Park Lane, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7DX

1876/2/001/O B2.2 5.27 Objection Changes are unreasonable and contrary to national guidance. Reference to smaller dwellings is unduly restrictive. Fails to account Joint Case for regeneration benefits of using former employment land. Re-instate original clauses.

Standedge Limited 9 Retiro Street, Oldham, OL1 1SA

0018/2/003/S H1.1 H1.1.8 Land at Redgrave Street, Oldham Now Deleted Support Conditional withdrawl. FD Ref: 0018/1/002/O

Mr & Mrs J Stanford 2 Wharmton View, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JU

1796/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Not in favour of a retail development due to impacts on traffic and local shops. Joint Case

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 451 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr&Mrs Stead 14 Greencroft Meadow, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LQ

0454/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Wish to see land protected as green belt to prevent any building on FD Ref: 0454/1/001/O land.

Marilyn Sterndale 5 WestView, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TR

1667/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1667/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1667/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1667/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Maurice Sterndale 5 Westview, Delph, Oldham OL3 5TR

1668/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 452 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1668/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1668/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1668/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Katherine Stevenson 45 Hudderfield Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SB

1669/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1669/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1669/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1669/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr P. Stevenson 53 Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7LD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 453 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0761/2/002/S H1.2 H1.2.12 Land at Shaw Hall Bank Rd, Greenfield Now Deleted Support Supports the deletion of this housing allocation. FD Ref: 0761/1/001/O

Neil D Stewart 37A Chew Brook Drive, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7PD

1791/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Mix invites threat of food store. Retail policy offers limited protection to local shops. A proposed food store will destroy Joint Case existing Greenfield shops. There is enough in Oldham Town. Remove reference to retail or limit the size. Retain the mill.

M Stone 40 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

1348/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1348/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr P Stott 7 Pickhill Mews, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6LY

1670/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1670/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 454 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1670/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1670/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Peter Stott 45 Oldham Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EB

1671/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1671/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1671/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1671/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs B Stott 3 Hebron Street, Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1861/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation / Local Green Gap, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Sheila Stott 45 Oldham Road, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5EB

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 455 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1672/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1672/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1672/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1672/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr John Strange Birches Farm, Gellfield Lane, Uppermill OL3 6LH

1680/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1680/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1680/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 456 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1680/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Ronnan Strzala 1 Saint Anns Square, Delph, Oldham OL3 5JD

1681/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1681/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1681/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1681/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Stubbs 63 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1673/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1673/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 457 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1673/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1673/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Maureen Stvzaker 4 Turfton Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6EW

1349/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1349/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

S Summerscales Lincoln Street, Werneth, Oldham OL9 7RN

1383/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1383/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1383/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 458 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1383/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs C Sunderland Knowl House, Bleak Hey Nook, Delph OL3 5LY

1674/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1674/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1674/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1674/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr C Sunderland Knowl House, Bleak Hey Nook, Delph OL3 5LY

1675/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1675/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 459 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1675/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1675/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Olivia Sunderland Knowl House, Bleak Hey Nook, Delph OL3 5LY

1676/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1676/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1676/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1676/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J Sutcliffe Springhead Cottage, Heights Lane, Delph OL3 5TU

1678/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 460 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1678/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1678/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1678/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Ian Sutcliffe 12 Summerhill View, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5TB

1677/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1677/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1677/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1677/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Roy Sutcliffe Springhead Cottage, Heights Lane, Delph OL3 5TU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 461 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1679/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1679/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1679/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1679/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

C Sweeney 51 Linkside Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 6YS

1351/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1351/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Caroline Sykes 10a Kinders Lane, Greenfield, Oldham OL3

1753/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 462 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Leslie Sykes 13 Dale Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HY

1682/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1682/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1682/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1682/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Marjorie Sykes 16 Oozewood Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 5XN

1352/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1352/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Peter Sykes 16 Oozewood Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 5XW

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 463 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1360/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1360/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Tameside MBC Council Offices, Wellington Road, Ashton under Lyne OL6 6DL

1885/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to inclusion of areas on the border with Tameside near Hartshead Pike and Quick Edge, Mossley on the areas of search for wind development map due to impacts on visual, landscape and listed buildings.

Tanner Brothers Ltd Agent : Michael Courcier and Partners Waterside Mill, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7NH

0267/2/005/O H1 Objection The revised housing figure of 270 dwellings per annum is too low. Additional housing land should be allocated.

0267/2/006/O H1 Objection Housing clearance strategy is unclear. Greater clarification required to establish what is involved and how many dwewllings provided. Additional housing land should be allocated to make up for loss of dwellings through greening of older areas.

0267/2/007/O H1 6.13 Objection Development of replacement dwellings on cleared sites gives inaccurate reflection of windfall development. Unlikely that development of replacement dwellings on cleared sites will result in increase in dwellings. Allowance for cleared sites needed.

0267/2/008/O H1.1 6.27 Objection Strategy for reoccupation of vacant dwellings is too vague. Reoccupation of vacant dwellings should not be counted against housing requirement, as double counting would result. Additional housing land should be allocated.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 464 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0267/2/009/O H1.1 Objection Uncertain that additional sites listed will come forward within the life of the UDP. Doubts due to environmental constraints and marketability; previously developed sites should come forward before greenfield allocations. Shortfall in provision.

0267/2/010/O H1.5 Objection Notion of achieving a mix of types and sizes supported. Threshold too low, however, and policy should not apply to all sites. Greater emphasis should be placed on provision for local needs and threshold raised to sites over 1ha and 25 dwellings.

0267/2/011/O H2.1 Objection Proposed changes do not account for local variations in affordable housing needs. Policy should be reworded to take account of variations in local housing markets needs and trends.

0267/2/012/O H1.2 Objection Doubt as to whether the additional sites included in Revised Deposit Draft version of Policy H1.2 will come forward.

0267/2/013/O H1.1 6.27 Objection Reoccupation of vacant dwellings should not be counted against the housing requirement as this would result in double counting against the Regional Planning Guidance requirement which already makes this provision.

Bernard Taylor 14 Grains Road, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5DS

1683/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1683/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1683/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 465 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1683/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Charlotte Taylor 49 Gladstone Terrace Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7HF

1684/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1684/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1684/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1684/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

David Taylor 10 Holcombe View Close, Moorside, Oldham

1384/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1384/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 466 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1384/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1384/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Enid A Taylor 8 Hillspring Road, Springhead, Oldham OL4 4SJ

1385/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1385/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1385/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1385/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Helen Taylor Higher Oxhey Farm, Oxhey Lane, Denshaw OL

1685/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 467 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1685/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1685/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1685/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Jean Taylor Thornbury House, Thorp, Royton OL2 5TH

1402/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1402/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

M Taylor Thornbury House, Thorp, Royton OL2 5TH

1401/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1401/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 468 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Malcolm Taylor 10 Steadway, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7DY

1752/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mr T G Taylor 46 Alandale Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TU

1404/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1404/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs J Taylor 76 Birch Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2QM

1400/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1400/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

W Taylor 493 Rochdale Road, Middleton, Manchester M24 2GH

1406/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 469 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1406/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Elizabeth Teague The Monastery, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1687/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1687/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1687/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1687/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Holly Teague The Monastery, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1688/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1688/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 470 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1688/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1688/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Alan Teague The Monastery, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1686/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1686/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1686/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1686/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Sally Teague The Monastery, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1689/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 471 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1689/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1689/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1689/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Tesco Stores Ltd Agent : Development Planning P/ship P O Box 400, Cirrus Building, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City AL7 1AB

1827/2/001/S S1 Huddersfield Road District Centre Support Tesco are supportive of the extension to the boundary of Huddersfield Road District Centre for comprehensive redevelopment incorporating new build and refurbishment for a mix of uses to stimulate regeneration.

1827/2/002/O S1 Objection The definition of the area beyond the Central Shopping Core as "edge of centre" is in conflict with the PPG6 definition of edge of centre. There is also ambiguity in applying the sequential approach. Clarification is required on both these points.

1827/2/003/O S1.2 Objection The 300 sq.m. size threshold for applying the applying the policy tests is inappropriately low and far too prescriptive. It should be amended. Clarification is sought on the suggested use of planning conditions.

1827/2/004/O S1.3 Objection The role of shops in encouraging footfall should be expanded upon. The Plan should acknowledge the `anchor` role that larger retail units can play in vitalising centres.

1827/2/005/O S1.6 Objection The requirement for development to be consistent with the function of a District Centre is not in accordance with PPG6 and should be omitted from the policy.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 472 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1827/2/006/O S1.7 Objection Reference to retail statements is unnecessarily re-iterated in three paragraphs. The content overall is repetitive and complex and should be re-visited and re-worded. (7.40/7.42/7.43)

1827/2/007/O T2.1 Objection The requirement for all major new developments generating a significant number of trips to have at least good access to public transport is overtly stringent and is not specified in PPG13. It should be changed to accord with national policy.

1827/2/008/S B1.2 Support The role other employment generating uses which complement adjoining development or are compatible with B1 or B2 uses can have is supported. The Council should be mindful of the role retail investment can have on job creation and local economy.

1827/2/009/O B1.3 M4 Huddersfield Road / Dunkerley Street, Oldham Objection No justification or explanation of the rationale behind the allocation and why the change from District Centre status has been provided. In light of this, Tesco would question whether the definitive boundary can be established.

1827/2/010/O R1.1 Objection Omit from text of Policy R1.1 under a., the requirement for the replacement facility where required, to be provided prior to the use of the existing site / facility being terminated, since PPG 17 does not require this.

1827/2/011/O D1.1 3.14 to 3.16 Objection The requirement for design statements to be submitted in support of all planning applications (including outline) is opposed, because design statements will not always be necessary, and design requirements would better be set out in SPG.

1827/2/012/O D1.2 Objection Support the opportunistic approach that this policy adopts in promoting innovative and energy efficient design, but the Council should consider translating these requirements into Supplementary Planning Guidance.

The Environment Agency Appleton House, 430 Birchwood Boulevard, Birchwood Warrington WA3 7WD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 473 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0665/2/008/O OE1.10 Land off Chetwyn Avenue, Royton Objection Objects to removal of part of LGG1 as the River Irk flows through the area removed, therefore the protection given to the river and its banks would be decreased.

0665/2/009/O OE1.8 Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Objection No objection to allocation but policy should include clause to protect and enhance Chew Brook and mill lodges.

0665/2/010/S NR2.2 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0665/1/001/O

0665/2/011/S NR2.3 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0665/1/002/O

0665/2/012/S NR2.1 Support Conditionally withdraws. FD Ref: 0665/1/004/O

0665/2/013/S NR1 Support Conditionally withdraws - objection met by Policy NR2.1. FD Ref: 0665/1/005/O

0665/2/014/S NR0 Support Conditionally withdraws. (NR2 13.42) FD Ref: 0665/1/006/O

0665/2/015/S NR0 Support Partial withdraws. Agency welcomes the inclusion of Appendix B. FD Ref: 0665/1/007/O However, it is still considered that more summarised information is needed in the Plan for development allocations.

0665/2/016/O NR1.6 13.35 Objection Policy does not adequately address issue of landfill gas migration. It FD Ref: 0665/1/003/O covers land remediation, but not specifically landfill gas migration. Delete reference to Enviornment Agency in para 13.35 as other bodies may also hold information on risk.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 474 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

The House Builders Federation Westerdale Suite, Tower Court Business Centre, Oakdale Road, Clifton Moor, York YO30 4XL

0108/2/011/O H1 Objection Objects to: the use of SPG's to revise statutory policy, the housing FD Ref: 0108/1/001/O "target" of 270 dellings p.a., and assumptions regarding clearance levels and the strategy to replace cleared dwellings, including the non-replacement of vacant dwellings.

0108/2/012/S H1.3 Support Proposed changes welcomed as the policy is permissive to FD Ref: 0108/1/005/O development rather than restrictive.

0108/2/013/S H0 Support Supports addition of Appendix B, although maintains remainder of FD Ref: 0108/1/004/O original objection relating to a lack of choice in the Phase 2 allocations.

0108/2/014/S D1.6 Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0108/1/003/O

0108/2/015/S Original D1.2 Now Deleted Support Conditionally withdrawn. FD Ref: 0108/1/002/O

0108/2/016/S GS0 2.4 Support Conditionally withdrawn. (Objection originally related to GS1) FD Ref: 0108/1/010/O

The National Trust NW Region, Stamford Estates Office, 18 Market Street, Altrincham WA14 1PH

1616/2/001/O OE2 11.70 Objection Although generally supportive of the additional text at the end of par. 11.70, it is felt that the second sentence should appear in the Policy itself rather than in the supporting text.

1616/2/002/O OE2.1 11.75 Objection Supportive of additional text at end of para. 11.75 (re. assessing impact of development on visual qualities and values of the National Park) but wishes for it to be in the Policy rather than supporting text.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 475 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1616/2/003/S OE2.3 Support Supports additional wording at end of sub-para.c. Nature conservation value of a variety of elements of the wider landscape is often under appreciated. Are important components of the ecology of an area.

1616/2/004/S OE2.3 Map change 11/20 Support Supports inclusion on Proposals Map of the boundaries of the National and International Nature Conservation Areas within the Borough. Important designations that should be made readily apparent to users of the UDP.

1616/2/005/O GS0 2.3 f. Objection The statement does not reflect Government policy on Green Belt. It should be amended to remove the reference to renewable energy generation or clarify that very special circumstances will need to be demonstrated to justify inappropriate development.

1616/2/006/O NR3.1 13.77 Objection Need an appropriate balance between renewable energy sources and environmental protection. Para 13.77 does not adequately accord with national policy. Suggested amended wording for Para 13.77.

1616/2/007/O NR3.2 13.81-13.91 Objection Need an appropriate balance between renewable energy sources and environmental protection. Areas of search map is without basis, and fails to take account of landscape character and Peak National Park. Delete map and prepare SPG.

1616/2/008/S D1.2 Support Policies such as D1.2 have an important role to play in encouraging and promoting greater energy efficiency through the planning system. Hope that further guidance in the form of an SPG will be prepared.

J D Theakstone Knowl Farm, Standedge, Delph OL3 5LU

1690/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 476 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1690/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1690/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1690/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

W H Theakstone Knowl Farm, Standedge, Delph OL3 5LU

1691/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1691/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1691/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1691/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

A Thomas 35 Willington Road, Duddon, Tarporley CW6 0HD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 477 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1692/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1692/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1692/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1692/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr David Thomas Moorlands Caravan Park, Ripponden Road, Denshaw OL3 5UN

1693/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1693/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1693/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 478 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1693/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr E Thomas 70 Grasmere Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6SJ

1408/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1408/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Gareth Thomas Hawthorn View, Horest Lane, Denshaw OL

1694/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1694/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1694/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1694/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 479 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs D Thomas 33 Harewood Drive, Royton, Oldham OL2 5TZ

1407/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1407/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J Thompson 1 Lichfield Close, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SF

1696/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1696/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1696/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1696/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr David Thompson The Millinery, Lee Street, Uppermill OL3 6AE

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 480 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1695/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1695/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1695/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1695/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs Joan E Thompson 23 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0076/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0076/1/001/O

Ann Thorne Maudson Cottage, Mason Row, Thurston Clough Road, Scouthead, Oldham OL4 3RX

1891/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to wind developments in Saddleworth.

Thornham Area Neighbourhood Council 64 Tandle Hill Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UX

0091/2/005/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to wind development policy, particularly the area of search map including Tandle Hill area. Area used for recreation, turbines in area would spoil views.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 481 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mr&Mrs SK Thornton 451 Shaw Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6PB

0501/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Reservations about Local Green Gap policy - may allow some FD Ref: 0501/1/001/O development. Would prefer designation to be protected open land.

Alan Thorpe 5 Netherhouse Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EX

1426/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1426/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs G Thorpe 5 Netherhouse Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EX

1428/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1428/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr G.H. Tibbot 7 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX

1231/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to area of search for wind developments in Saddleworth. Environmental return would be minimal. Potential danger of ice on blades being projected and injuring members of public.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 482 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

S Timmins 362 Shaw Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6PB

1386/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1386/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1386/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1386/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

W A Tomlinson 1 Hill Top Farm, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SB

0691/2/005/S T1.4 4.26 Rochdale Canal Support Support the changes, especially insofar as they relate to the Rochdale Canal at Mills Hill and Chadderton Hall Park.

P Townrow 19 Lee Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6AB

1751/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

D Travis Heights Lane, Saddleworth, Oldham OL3

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 483 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1697/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1697/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1697/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1697/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Phillip Travis Higher Barn Farm, Dark Lane, Delph OL3 5TY

1698/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1698/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1698/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 484 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1698/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs G Travis 8 Lichfield Close, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SF

0658/2/003/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0658/2/004/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0658/2/005/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0658/2/006/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Susan Travis Tame Head, Buckley Drive, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5RT

0661/2/003/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0661/2/004/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 485 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0661/2/005/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0661/2/006/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Troll Pension Fund Agent : Chorlton Planning c/o 2 New Street, Uppermill, Oldham

1415/2/001/O NR2.2 Spring Mill, Uppermill Objection Proposals map should show precise flood risk area, not diagrammatic indicative flood area, to ensure future owners are fully Joint Case informed of risk. (map change ref 13/16)

Mrs P Trueman 1 Wham Cottage, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

1700/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1700/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1700/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1700/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

R B Trueman 1 Wham Cottage, Slackcote Lane, Denshaw OL3 5TZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 486 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1701/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1701/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1701/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1701/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Turner 71 Stockport Road, Lydgate, Oldham OL4 4JJ

1702/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1702/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1702/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 487 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1702/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ruth Turner 1 Summerhill View, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5TB

1703/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1703/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1703/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1703/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr&Mrs DG Tyrrell 21 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0086/2/002/S OE1.10 Summershades Lane Support Partial Withdraw. FD Ref: 0086/1/001/O Joint Case

U-Aerials & Communications Ltd Agent : Medlock Group

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 488 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0711/2/004/O B2.2 5.27 Objection Changes are unreasonable and contrary to national guidance. Reference to smaller dwellings is unduly restrictive. Fails to account Joint Case for regeneration benefits of using former employment land. Re-instate original clauses.

Barry Ulyatt 17 Ripponden Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SH

0655/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0655/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0655/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0655/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Margaret Ulyatt 17 Ripponden Road, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SH

0654/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0654/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 489 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0654/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0654/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

United Utilities Green Energy Ltd Agent : Atkins Planning Consultants c/o Agent, ,

1887/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Supports the areas of search for wind developments and the principle of policy, but reference should be made to landscape character, Draft PPS22 and national sustainability objectives, as well as to the benefits of renewable energy projects.

United Utilities PLC Ground Floor, Thirlmere House, Lingley Mere, Lingley Green Avenue, Warrington WA5 3LP

1413/2/001/S OE1.8 Robert Fletcher (Greenfield) Ltd Support Water mains will need extending to serve any development on this site.

1413/2/002/S NR2.1 Support Necessary to protect public health in relation to drinking water supplies

1413/2/003/O H1.3 Objection The requirement that new developments are accessible to both public transport and a range of basic services could preclude the development of previously developed land which lies outside the threshold distances set out in the policy..

Yvonne Unsworth 51 Cheshire Street, Mossley, Oldham OL5 9NN

1704/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 490 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1704/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1704/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1704/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Catherine Varnom Gatehead House (Flat 2), Gatehead Road, Delph OL3 5QE

1705/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1705/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1705/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1705/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Village Greens 87 High Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6AP

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 491 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1785/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Retail policies offer limited protection to local shops. No retail as part of the mix of uses or limit the maximum size of any units.

Village Store 24 Wood Square, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7AR

1779/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Opposed to a supermarket. Any store built should be restricted to 2,500 sq.ft.

B Viner 13 Cleveland Grove, Royton, Oldham OL2 5EX

1440/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1440/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

D Viner 13 Cleveland Grove, Royton, Oldham OL2 5EX

1439/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1439/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

W H Shaw Agent : Michael Courcier and Partners Huddersfield Road, Diggle, OLDHAM OL3 5NU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 492 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1944/2/001/O H0 6.5 (g) Objection Housing allocations should be made in Diggle to provide for local housing needs in the village.

1944/2/002/O H1 6.09-6.14 Objection Inappropriate to include development of replacement dwelllings on cleared sites within windfall development allowance. A separate allowance for replacement dwellings on cleared sites should be provided.

1944/2/003/O H1.1 6.27 Objection Strategy for reoccupation of dwellings is too vague. Reoccupation of vacant properties should not be counted against housing requirement as this leads to double counting. Additional housing land is required.

1944/2/004/O H1 Objection The revised housing figure of 270 per annum is too low. Additional housing land should be supplied.

1944/2/005/O H1 Objection Housing clearance strategy is unclear. If clearance programme involves greening older urban areas or loss of public open space then clearance will result in a loss of dwellings and additional housing land will be needed.

1944/2/006/O H1.5 6.47-6.50 Objection Mix of housing types threshold is too low and should not apply to all sites.

1944/2/007/O H2.1 Objection Proposed changes do not take account of local variations in affordable housing needs. Requirements for affordable dwellings varies signifcantly in different parts of the Borough. Amend policy to take account of local housing market trends and needs.

1944/2/008/O B0 5.4 Objection Proposed changes are inappropriate to protect employment uses on sites in the urban fringe and countryside where business uses are unachievable. Tourism is is only viable in certain locations. Amend in light of recent changes to PPG3.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 493 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1944/2/009/O B0 5.3 Objection Review of employment sites referred to in para. 5.3 does not consider instances where existing employment development uses or future development is no longer viable. Employment sites should be reviewed in light of changes to PPG3.

1944/2/010/O GS0 2.3 c. Objection Greater emphasis should be placed on local housing needs in settlements isolated from the main urban area, particularly in Diggle where no allocations have been made.

1944/2/011/O GS0 2.3 d. Objection Emphasis on strategic employment sites is supported. However, this is not so for those employment sites that have not come forward over life of extant UDP or that are not of strategic value. Employment strategy needs to take account of revised PPG3.

1944/2/012/O B1.1 5.9 Objection Proposed changes do not take account of employment sites located in conservation areas or listed buildings where employment uses would have adverse effects on character and setting of the listed building which is contrary to PPG15.

1944/2/013/O B0 5.4 Objection Changes are inappropriate to protect employment uses on sites in the urban fringe and countryside where business uses are unachievable. The paragraph should be reworded to account for the guidance in PPG3.

1944/2/014/O H1.1 6.27 Objection Reoccupation of vacant dwellings should not be counted against the housing requirement as this would result in double counting against Joint Case the Regional Planning Guidance requirement which already makes this provision.

E Wadsworth 13 Briar Grove, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0EH

1442/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 494 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1442/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Angela Walker 4 Westminster Avenue, Oozewood, Royton, Oldham OL2 5XX

1443/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1443/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ann Walker 15 Treetops Close, Dobcross, Oldham OL3 5AS

1843/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to policy on wind developments which is seen to send out positive message to developers to site wind farms in Saddleworth area.

Claire Walker 11 Buckley Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 63P

1387/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1387/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 495 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1387/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1387/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

E R Walker 41 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1706/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1706/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1706/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1706/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Ted Walker 13 Buckley Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6BP

1388/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 496 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1388/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1388/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1388/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dominic Wall 9 Steadway, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7DY

1888/2/001/S NR3.2 Support Supports the proposal to allow development of wind farms on the areas identified on the Proposals Map.

J S Walsh 2 Ammons Way, Delph, Oldham OL3 5US

1708/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1708/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1708/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 497 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1708/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J Walsh 1 Martin Cottages, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SP

1707/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1707/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1707/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1707/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Lowe Walter 1B Racefield Hamlet, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton OL1 2TB

1135/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1135/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 498 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

B R Walton 10 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3

1709/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1709/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1709/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1709/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Pauline Walton 10 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3

1710/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1710/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1710/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 499 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1710/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

B & T Warburton & Johnson 43 Surrey Ave, High Crompton, Oldham OL2 7DN

0471/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0471/1/001/O

Matthew Warburton 297 Huddersfield Road, Diggle, Saddleworth OL3 5PJ

1389/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1389/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1389/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1389/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Alistair Ward 3 Victor Road, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 3JS

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 500 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1711/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1711/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1711/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1711/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Margaret Ward 35 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham, OL4 4EE

0054/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Supports Local Green Gap designation but objects to the 'weaker' FD Ref: 0054/1/001/O revised definition of LGG. Would like to see the original definition in the First Deposit retained to protect the land from development.

Nicholas Ward 52 Oldham Road, Denshaw, Saddleworth OL3 5SP

1712/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1712/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 501 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1712/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1712/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr&Mrs D S Wareing 27 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0596/2/002/S OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Supports Local Green Gap designation but wishes to see the original FD Ref: 0596/1/001/O definition in the First Deposit retained.

Alan Waterhouse 106 Heyside, Royton, Oldham OL2 6LS

1862/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would likeLocal Green Gap designation, not Land Reserved for Future Joint Case Development as in revised deposit draft to safeguard the amenity of the area.

Watermill Estates Limited Agent : GL Hearn Planning The Old Library, Vale Road, Stourport-on-Severn DY13 8YJ

0795/2/004/O S1 Objection The policy only permits new development where there are suitable and viable development sites. However, there is no national policy requirement for viability to be positively demonstrated. Remove reference to viability.

C.H. Watson The Moorlands, 21 Edward Rd, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EZ

0395/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Accepts change in principle but still concerned that any future FD Ref: 0395/1/001/O development would involve access/egress from Edward Road which Joint Case is his prime concern.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 502 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Kathleen Watson 2 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, OLDHAM OL4 4ED

1890/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to Saddleworth being identified as an area suitable for wind developments. Wind farms are intrusive visually and a noise pollutant. Remove the designation from Saddleworth.

Nigel Watson Lane Top, 2 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

1235/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Saddleworth should not be designated as a wind farm development area. Visually intrusive and noisy. Unsuited to Saddleworth, a popular tourist spot. Refer to map 13/18

W Watson 25 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1444/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1444/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

W Watson Watersgate, Hudderfield Road, Delph OL3 5LX

1713/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1713/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 503 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1713/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1713/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J.L Watt 158 Rochdale Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7JR

1390/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1390/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1390/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1390/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Moraig Watt 4Turfton Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6EW

1445/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 504 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1445/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Alistair Watts 6 Grains Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5DS

1715/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1715/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1715/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1715/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Eric W Watts 228 Oldham Road, Lydgate, Nr Oldham OL4 4DN

1391/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1391/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 505 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1391/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1391/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Janet Watts 228 Oldham Road, Lydgate, OLDHAM OL4 4DN

1942/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1942/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1942/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1942/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs S E Watts 43 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1447/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 506 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1447/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Joyce Webb Sandbed Farm House, Hull MIll Lane, Delph OL

1717/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1717/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1717/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1717/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Norman Webb Sandbed Farm House, Hull Mill Lane, Delph OL

1716/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1716/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 507 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1716/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1716/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Angela Webster 20 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5QB

1718/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1718/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1718/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1718/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Henry Webster 20 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5QB

1719/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 508 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1719/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1719/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1719/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Peter Webster 20 Gatehead Croft, Delph, Oldham OL3 5QB

0639/2/003/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0639/2/004/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0639/2/005/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0639/2/006/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

K Weigh Junction House, 1 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw OL3 5SD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 509 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1720/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1720/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1720/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1720/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs Weigh 26 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1721/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1721/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1721/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 510 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1721/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

F.K & H.R Wellens Brook-Lyn, Hull Mill Lane, Delph OL3 5UR

1722/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1722/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1722/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1722/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Amy Wells 45 Cooper Street, Springhead, Oldham OL4 4QS

1723/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1723/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 511 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1723/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1723/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Westbury Homes Westbury House, Crofts Bank Road, Urmston, Manchester M41 0JS

0107/2/007/W H1 6.21 Support Unconditionally Withdrawn. FD Ref: 0107/1/001/O

0107/2/008/W H1.1 6.30 Objection Unconditionally Withdrawn. FD Ref: 0107/1/004/O

0107/2/014/S CF1.5 Support Policy does not define what is meant by specilised schemes. FD Ref: 0107/1/002/O Reference to economics of development does not go far enough - needs to relate to the viability of development, especially on brownfield sites. Inconsistency btw policy and justification. Westbury Homes Agent : Broadway Malyan Westbury House, Crofts Bank Road, Urmston, Manchester M41 0JS

0107/2/009/O H1 6.22 Objection Supports the Council's commitment to an annual monitoring report, but objects to the use of Supplementary Planning Guidance to manage the release of phased sites.

0107/2/010/O H1 6.09-6.14 Objection Method for calculating clearance will create an under-recording of the reduction of the Borough's housing stock. Delete para s. 6.10, 613 & 6.14 and add an assurance that to accurately record all housing clearances.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 512 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0107/2/011/O H1 6.23 Objection Allocated sites should be developed out in advance of any windfall sites. Windfall sites should not be allowed to queue jump as implied by para. 6.23.

0107/2/012/O H1.1 6.25 & 6.27 Objection Reoccupation of vacant stock should not count towards the Borough's annual housing requirement. Delete para. 6.27 and reinstate the reference to the Council's Empty Homes Strategy.

0107/2/013/O H1.2 H1.2.14 Sandy Mill, Royton Objection Request for an minor extension to the allocation boundary.

Mrs L C Whitaker Millcroft Farm, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UX

1725/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1725/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1725/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1725/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs F Whitehead 40 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 513 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0279/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0279/1/001/O

Vera Whitehead 21 Haggate Crescent, Royton, Oldham OL2 5NF

1474/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1474/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J White 44 Wellington Road, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7AQ

1750/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mr&Mrs R.H White 1 Netherhouse Road, High Crompton, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EX

0211/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0211/1/001/O

Mr & Mrs Whiteoak 20 Hebron Street, Heyside Royton, Oldham OL2 6LU

1855/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Support de - allocation from Business and Industry, but would like Green Belt designation, not Land Reserved for Future Development as in revised deposit draft.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 514 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

A & J Whitmore 35 Stoneswood Road, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5DY

1724/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1724/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1724/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1724/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Harrison Whittaker 30 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UN

1726/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1726/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1726/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 515 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1726/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Patricia Whittaker 30 Palinwood Road, Delph, Saddleworth OL3 5UW

1727/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1727/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1727/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1727/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr R. Whittles 50 Edward Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EY

0281/2/002/O OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Objection Land should be designated as green belt. FD Ref: 0281/1/001/O Joint Case

J Whitworth 330 Middleton Road, Royton, Oldham

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 516 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1475/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1475/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

P Whitworth 330 Middleton Road, Royton, Oldham

1477/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1477/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mark Whyatt 55 Chetwyn Avenue, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UJ

1480/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1480/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Christine Widdall 2 Rushgrove, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6LD

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 517 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1392/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1392/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1392/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1392/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

John A Widdall 2 Rush Grove, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6LD

1728/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1728/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1728/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 518 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1728/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Wiggett Construction Ltd Agent : Chorlton Planning Viking House, 449 Middleton Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9LB

0045/2/031/S H1 Support Supports reference to upper market housing (see objective (g) of the FD Ref: 0045/1/031/O Housing Introduction).

Wiggett Construction Ltd Agent : Michael Courcier and Partners Viking House, 449 Middleton Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9LB

0045/2/032/O H1.1 6.27 Objection Reoccupation of vacant dwellings should not be counted against the housing requirement as this would result in double counting against the Regional Planning Guidance requirement which already makes this provision.

0045/2/033/O R2.1 Objection Until the Council has completed a local assessment of needs in accordance with PPG17 this policy is premature and it should be deleted.

0045/2/034/O R1.1 Objection PPG17 requires UDP policies to be based upon robust local assessments of need for open space, sport and recreational facilities. Oldham have not undertaken an assessment. Open space survey should be completed to accord with PPG17.

0045/2/035/O R1.1 Objection There is no reason to exclude Council owned sites from the interim protection accorded to open spaces until the local needs assessment is complete. Amend policy to apply also to Council-owned sites.

0045/2/036/O D1.2 Objection Policy/explanation does not make clear that there are other considerations that may override energy efficiency in considering development layouts. Amend policy/explanation to make this clear.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 519 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0045/2/037/O B2.2 Objection Draft revision to PPG3 indicates that the policy as a whole is inappropriate, particularly the revised criterion b) that does not clarify instances where the continuation of employment use is not acceptable. Amend criterion b).

0045/2/038/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Welcomes the inclusion of retail within the list of acceptable uses on the site. However, the 40% limit on residential development is arbitrary and without justification. A higher percentage of residential development should be permitted on the site.

0045/2/039/O H1 6.09-6.14 Objection Clearance strategy does not accord with RPG. HMR will mean higher clearance levels than shown. Need for replacement off-site due to density/open space needs. Para 6.13 will result in double counting. Amend to accord with RPG/avoid double counting.

0045/2/040/O Appendix B M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Land uses listed in amended Appendix B do not increase the certainty of development on this site. Reference to tourism should be removed to make clear that such development is not a prerequisite to provide greater certainty over non-tourism uses.

0045/2/041/O H1.2 H1.2.12 Land at Shaw Hall Bank Rd, Greenfield Now Deleted Objection The site at Shaw Hall Bank Road, Greenfield should be reinstated as a housing allocation. It is in a highly sustainable location and meets the requirements of PPG3 and RPG for allocation.

0045/2/042/O H1.2 H1.2.6 Lilac View Close Objection The capacity of Lilac View Close should not be reduced from 24 to 18. It should be maintained at 24 dwellings.

0045/2/043/O H1.2 6.37-6.38 Objection Paragraphs 6.37 and 6.38 do not clarify the phasing strategy. They should be deleted and a date set for the release of Phase 2 sites.

0045/2/044/O H1.5 6.47-6.50 Objection Principle of achieving a mix of housing types and sizes is supported. However, the threshold is too low and should not apply to all sites. Increase the threshold and it should not apply to all sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 520 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0045/2/045/O H1.4 6.42-6.46 Objection Policy is overly mechanistic and does not allow for reasonable flexibility to take into account the wide variety of housing types required by Oldham. Second and third paragraphs should be deleted or amended to provide flexibility in housing density.

0045/2/046/O H2.1 6.65-6.74 Objection Policy does not sufficiently justify the general presumption that 25% of the site capacity should be developed as affordable housing. If adequate evidence cannot be presented the policy requirement should be deleted.

0045/2/047/O H1 6.22-6.23 Objection Proposed changes are not in accordance with Best Practice Guidance: Planning to Deliver. Second phase releases should have a release date attached. Phasing arrangements are too vague and cause uncertainty.

Mr & Mrs Wigley Higher Grange Farm, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1729/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1729/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1729/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1729/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kathryn Wilcox 339 Huddersfield Road, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5PJ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 521 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1393/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1393/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1393/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1393/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

A Wild 29 Skipton Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0PQ

1482/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1482/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Alice Wild 59 Dairy Street, Chadderton, Oldham

1483/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 522 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1483/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Alison Wild Head O'th Heys Farm, Cinderhill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SS

1485/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1485/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Dean Wild Head O'th Heys Farm, Cinderhill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SS

1486/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1486/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

G Wild 104 Broadway, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0AA

1487/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 523 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1487/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

J Wild 29 Skipton Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0PQ

1489/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1489/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Miss Jean Wild No.1 F Racefield Hamlet, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2TB

1490/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1490/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr Eric Wild 19 Huddersfield Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5EG

0677/2/003/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 524 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0677/2/004/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0677/2/005/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0677/2/006/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

P Wild 104 Broadway, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0AA

1492/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1492/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Pat Wild Head O'th Heys Farm, Cinderhill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SS

1493/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1493/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 525 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Rodney Wild Head O'th Heys Farm, Cinderhill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SS

1495/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1495/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Ross Wild 5 Standrick Hill Rise, Stalybridge, SK15 3RT

1497/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1497/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Victoria P Wild 5 Standrick Hill Rise, Stalybridge, Cheshire SK15 3RT

1498/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1498/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Sandra Wilkinson 94 George Street, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8HG

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 526 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1394/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1394/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1394/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1394/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Oliver Williams 41 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, OLDHAM OL3 5SB

1902/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Object to wind farms. Joint petition submitted with Eleanor Hague and signed by forty-six people.

Wilson Connolly Homes Agent : The Planning Consultancy Bradley Lane, Standish, Wigan WN6 0XN

1823/2/001/O H1.1 H1.1.1 Hunt Lane, Chadderton Now deleted Objection Objection to the deletion of this residential allocation. Site is suitable and available for residential development. Brownfield site, severly degraded in visual terms. Contaminated. Within walking distance of wide range of facilities.

Edith Wilson Marled Earth Farm, Tame Lane, Delph, Oldham OL2 5TT

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 527 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1395/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1395/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1395/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1395/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Gemma Wilson 26 Rivington Road, Springhead, Oldham OL4 4RJ

1730/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1730/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1730/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 528 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1730/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Kate Wilson 4 Stockport Road, Lydgate, Oldham OL

1731/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1731/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1731/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1731/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Katy Wilson 26 Rivington Road, Springhead, Oldham OL4 4RJ

1732/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1732/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 529 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1732/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1732/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M F Wilson 21 Burnedge Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EX

1500/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1500/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr R T Wilson Cinder Hill Farm, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SS

1505/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1505/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs J B Wilson Cinder Hill Farm, Cinder Hill Lane, Chadderton, Oldham OL1 2SS

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 530 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1502/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1502/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Robert A Wilson Marled Earth Farm, Tame Lane, Delph OL

1733/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1733/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1733/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1733/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Wineways 80 High Street, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6AW

1784/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Wants retail limited to small units. Joint Case

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 531 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Cllr Ann Wingate 62 Manor Road, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7JJ

1233/2/001/O NR3.2 Objection Objects to Shaw being indicated in area of search for wind developments. Would have detrimental effect on Shaw skyline and Joint Case could interfere with transmitting and receiving systems for aircraft passing overhead.

1233/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Welcomes classification of Cowlishaw as Local Green Gap. Also welcomes amended definition of LGG's which gives them greater protection against inappropriate development.

G Winterbottom 5 Sharon Avenue, The Park, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4HP

0827/2/002/S OE2.2 Lydgate Tunnel, Disused railway line, Grasscroft Support Conditionally withdraws FD Ref: 0827/1/001/O

R & K Winterbottom 25 Palinwood Road, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UW

1734/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1734/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1734/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1734/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 532 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

Mrs P A Winterburn 5 The Barracks, Oldham Road, Denshaw OL

1735/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1735/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1735/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1735/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

W Wolstenholme 16 Oak View Road, Greenfield, Saddleworth OL3 7EP

1749/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Doris Wood Grange School, Oldham Road, Oldham

1396/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 533 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1396/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1396/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1396/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Dennis Wood Horest Cottage, Horest Lane, Denshaw OL3 5SU

1736/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1736/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1736/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1736/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr Jack Wood Lower Mantley Farm, Oldham Road, Denshaw OL3 5RP

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 534 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1738/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1738/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1738/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1738/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Peter Wood 26 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4ED

0597/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Maintains original objection. Does not wish there to be any FD Ref: 0597/1/001/O development at all on the land. Joint Case

Phaedra Woods Dod and Partridge, 187 Oldham Road, Springhead OL4 4QJ

1397/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1397/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 535 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1397/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1397/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M C Woolley Ladybank, 10 Wool Road, Dobcross OL

1739/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1739/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1739/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1739/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Andrew Wooton The Nest, Horest Lane, Denshaw OL

1740/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 536 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1740/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1740/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1740/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Alastair Wright Aysgarth, Gatehead Road, Delph OL3

1741/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1741/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1741/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1741/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Bernard Wright 4 Lichfield Close, Denshaw, Oldham

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 537 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

0668/2/003/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

0668/2/004/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

0668/2/005/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

0668/2/006/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Dawn Wright 424 Shaw Road, Royton, Oldham OL2 6PG

1506/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1506/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mr R I Wright Clough Farm, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1743/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 538 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1743/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1743/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1743/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr&Mrs P. Wright 17 Denbigh Drive, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7EQ

0283/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0283/1/001/O

Mrs J Wright 11 Sykes Close, Greenfield, Oldham OL3 7PT

1748/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection Object to inclusion of retail as part of the mix of uses. There is strong opposition due to impacts on local shops and transport. Change policy to only permit units that do not exceed 400 sqm and that service the tourism-related canal marina.

Mrs Linda Wright Clough Farm, Millcroft Lane, Delph OL3 5UX

1742/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 539 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1742/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1742/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1742/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Myra Yewdale 39 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

1508/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1508/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Yorkshire Mills Ltd. Agent : Chorlton Planning The Greaves Building, Saddleworth Business Park, Huddersfield Road, Diggle OL3 5PJ

1947/2/001/S T1.1 Support Support the repositioning of the proposed Diggle Railway Station closer to the potential tourism development area centred on Tunnel Joint Case End and Warth Mill/Saddleworth Business Centre. It will provide visitors and employees with public transport access.

E Young 19 Tandlewood Park, Royton, Oldham OL2 5UZ

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 540 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section

1510/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1510/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 541 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations Mrs E Ainscough 21 Outram Mews, Uppermill, OLDHAM OL3 6BE

1919/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1919/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1919/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1919/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Clive A A Ball 46 Woods Lane, Dobcross, OLDHAM OL3 5AN

1910/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1910/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1910/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 542 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1910/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr A Bond 22 Riverside, Chadderton, OLDHAM OL1 2TX

1933/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1933/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

David Brock 3 Wibsey Cottages, Denshaw, OLDHAM OL3 5SJ

1916/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1916/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1916/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1916/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 543 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations Judith Dawson 118 Shaw Road, Thornham, Rochdale OL16 4SQ

1929/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1929/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Steve Dawson 118 Shaw Road, Thornham, Rochdale OL16 4SQ

1930/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1930/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

L and M Dean 12 Gatehead Croft, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5QB

1912/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1912/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 544 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1912/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1912/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

MrSM&Mrs C Durr 5 Hey Hill close, Royton, Oldham OL2 6QT

0336/2/002/S OE1.10 Support Conditionally Withdraws. FD Ref: 0336/1/001/O Joint Case

Mr N Haughton 42 Tandle Hill Road, Royton, OLDHAM OL2 5UX

1932/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

1932/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Mrs M Haughton 42 Tandle Hill Road, Royton, OLDHAM OL2 5UX

1931/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 545 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1931/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas.

Muriel Henry 10 Ripponden Road, Denshaw, OLDHAM OL3 5SH

1915/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1915/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1915/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1915/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr D Hobson Calico House, Printers Mill, Denshaw Vale, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5SX

1920/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1920/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 546 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1920/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1920/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M Hyncica Higherbroad Meadow Cottage, Oxhey Lane, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5UB

1923/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1923/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1923/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1923/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Bernard Keeley 50 Burnedge Fold Road, Grasscroft, Oldham OL4 4EE

0066/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Wants the land to be protected against future development. Wants FD Ref: 0066/1/001/O land to be Green Belt. Joint Case

Richard Lynch 19 Huddersfield Road, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5EG

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 547 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1925/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1925/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1925/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1925/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

John Markham 2 Dumfries Drive, Denshaw, OLDHAM

1918/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1918/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1918/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 548 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1918/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Joseph McGladdery 15 Palin Wood Road, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5VW

1908/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1908/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1908/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1908/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mr & Mrs McHugh 16 Hebron Street, Royton, OLDHAM OL2 6LU

1934/2/001/O OE1.9 Hebron Street Objection Map Change Ref No. 5/12. Any future development could adversely affect existing amenities. Merge the land into the existing adjacent Local Green Gap (referred to as `Green Gap Belt` on objection form).

Mrs M R Robson 78 Denshaw Road, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5EU

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 549 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1922/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1922/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1922/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1922/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

F H Schofield 3 Holland Close, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5DP

1913/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1913/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1913/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 550 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1913/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Mrs A M Spalding 6 Pickhill Mews, Pickhill Lane, Uppermill, Oldham OL3 6LY

1914/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1914/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1914/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1914/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Barbara Squirrell 119 Delph Lane, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5UT

1921/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1921/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 551 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1921/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1921/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Strategic Railway Authority 55 Victoria Street, LONDON, SW1H 0EU

1939/2/001/S T1.1 c. Diggle station Support The continuing reference to this station proposal is supported in the long term. Joint Case

1939/2/002/O T2.3 Objection Refers to First Deposit Draft Policy T2.3 and paragraph 4.47: Objects to deletion of this policy. Wants the original policy Joint Case re-instated.

1939/2/003/O B1.7 Objection The addtional text refering to potential connection to rail network is welcomed. However, policy should be more supportive of the Joint Case movement of goods by rail rather than by road. Additional wording suggested.

1939/2/004/O T3.3 Objection Support revised text in paragraph 4.55. However, the policy does not reflect the fact that parking levels at rail stations should be Joint Case determined by operators, Network Rail and SRA. Additional criterion suggested.

1939/2/005/O T1.1 4.11 Objection New station at Diggle is dependent upon the restoration of the 4 tracks through the Standedge tunnel. No further work is being taken Joint Case on this proposal by GMPTE until this is completed. Refer to SRA involvement in the station's proposals.

D & M Taylor Hull Mill Cottage, Hull Mill Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5UR

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 552 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1909/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1909/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1909/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1909/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

G Thompson 1 Leefields Close, Uppermill, OLDHAM OL3 6LA

1907/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1907/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1907/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 553 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1907/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Neil Tomlinson 55 Denshaw Road, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5EY

1906/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1906/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1906/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1906/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J and J Vickers 24 Gatehead Croft, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5QB

1911/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1911/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 554 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1911/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1911/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

J and H Waite 13 Huddersfield Road, Denshaw, OLDHAM OL3 5SD

1924/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1924/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1924/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1924/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

C E Walker 13 Buckley Street, Uppermill, OLDHAM OL3 6BP

1928/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 555 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1928/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1928/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1928/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Iain Weston 3 Delph Road, Denshaw, OLDHAM OL3 5RY

1927/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1927/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1927/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1927/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Juliet Williams 18 Huddersfield Road, Delph, OLDHAM OL3 5EG

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 556 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1926/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1926/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1926/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

1926/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

M Wimpenny 3 Delph Road, Denshaw, OLDHAM OL3 5RY

1917/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt.

1917/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists.

1917/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 557 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section LATE Representations 1917/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it.

Public List by Name udr220.rpt 558