Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section Schedule of Objections And

Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section Schedule of Objections And

Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section Mrs C.S. Abbott 7 Luzley Brook Rd, Royton, Oldham OL2 6SQ 0207/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0207/1/001/O Mrs N. Abbott 38 Netherhouse Road, Higher Crompton, Shaw, Oldham OL2 7HY 0193/2/002/S OE1.10 LR1 Cowlishaw Support Conditionally withdraw FD Ref: 0193/1/001/O A.R. Ackroyd 25 Dorset Avenue, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5PL 0909/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. 0909/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists. 0909/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites. 0909/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it. Mr P Ackroyd 2 Wham Cottage, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw, Oldham Public List by Name udr220.rpt 1 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section 0943/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. 0943/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists. 0943/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites. 0943/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it. Mrs Heidy Ackroyd 2 Wham Cottage, Slackgate Lane, Denshaw, Oldham OL3 5TZ 0941/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. 0941/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists. 0941/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites. Public List by Name udr220.rpt 2 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section 0941/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it. Susan Ackroyd 25 Dorset Avenue, Diggle, Oldham OL3 5PL 0910/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. 0910/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists. 0910/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites. 0910/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it. Mr Adamson 98 Oldham Road, Grasscroft, Saddleworth, Oldham OL4 4HU 0601/2/002/O OE1.10 LR9 Summershades Lane, Grasscroft Objection Objects to any development due to possibility of flooding of FD Ref: 0601/1/001/O properties down hill from site. Joint Case Adept Development & Management Ltd Agent : Cordingleys Tamewater Mill, Delph New Road, Dobcross, Saddleworth, Oldham OL3 5BE Public List by Name udr220.rpt 3 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section 0229/2/003/O B2.1 PEZ28 Tamewater Mill / Land adjacent to Mill Objection Map Change No 5/25. PEZ boundary changes are incorrect and inappropriate. Amend boundaries to reflect current business operations. Allow residential uses on the PEZ in line with recent Government policy statements. C. Ainsley 45 Mills Hill Road, Middleton, Manchester 0838/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage. 0838/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas. Ian Ainsley 12 Canisp Close, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 0NZ 0839/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage. 0839/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas. L. Ainsley 1026 Middleton Road, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9RZ 0836/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage. Public List by Name udr220.rpt 4 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section 0836/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas. Nelson Ainsley 32 Nowell Court, Middleton, Manchester M24 6EY 0840/2/001/O OE2.1 Objection Revised policy does not protect open environment/ open land sufficiently. Statement that no developments will be permitted Joint Case unless the benefits outweigh the damage they create is unacceptable. Wording should be changed to avoid any damage. 0840/2/002/O NR3.2 13.87 Objection Proposals map shows wind farms could be sited in Tandle Hill park and on ridge from Grains Bar to Crompton Moor. Reference to Joint Case weighing benefits against harm should be changed, and the map redrawn to remove these areas. Mr D Alcock 21 Delph Lane, Delph, Oldham OL3 5HX 0911/2/001/O NR3.1 Objection More specific criteria needed to protect green belt, nature sites, culture/history/archaeology, listed buildings/conservation areas and views in/out of the Peak NP. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. 0911/2/002/O NR3.2 Objection Delete search map. Retain criteria a-f, plus regionally designated nature sites. Benefits of turbines do not outweigh their inappropriateness in green belt. Applicants should show expected energy generation, and show that sufficient wind exists. 0911/2/003/O OE2.3 Objection Wind turbines and other major developments should not be sited within, or on the margins of, internationally, nationally, or regionally designated sites. 0911/2/004/O C1.1 Objection The words "views in or out" of a conservation area should be retained as the setting of a conservation area could be seriously impacted by the presence of wind turbines adjacent to, or in view of it. Public List by Name udr220.rpt 5 Schedule of Objections and Representations to 09/09/04 Oldham Replacement Unitary Development Plan Revised Deposit, October 2003 By Name Name Policy,Paragraph, Site, Section Mr & Mrs D Aldred Lyndhurst, Kinders Crescent, Greenfield, OLDHAM OL3 7JQ 1814/2/001/O B1.3 M1 Frenches Wharf Objection A proposed food store will destroy existing Greenfield shops.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    558 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us