DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download Games of Life Explorations in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior 1St Edition Pdf Free Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download Games of Life Explorations in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior 1St Edition Pdf Free Download GAMES OF LIFE EXPLORATIONS IN ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND BEHAVIOR 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Karl Sigmund | 9780486812892 | | | | | Games of Life Explorations in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior 1st edition PDF Book Can it ever pay to be nice in a world of selfish individualists? Mariner Books. This helps the gene spread, and also helps the organism. Accept all Manage Cookies Cookie Preferences We use cookies and similar tools, including those used by approved third parties collectively, "cookies" for the purposes described below. Amotz Zahavi 's theory of honest signalling explains stotting as a selfish act, he argues, improving the springbok's chances of escaping from a predator by indicating how difficult the chase would be. Open Advanced Search. The proven best way in evolutionary biology, as in most of science, is to define a problem arising during empirical research, then select or devise the theory that is needed to solve it. Lists with This Book. Rating details. More Filters. As an example, see Thompson. Meanwhile, Karl Sigmund's little book is as playful and giddy as a Weber clarinet concerto. It has sold over a million copies, and has been translated into more than 25 languages. The original replicator Dawkins' R eplicator was the initial molecule which first managed to reproduce itself and thus gained an advantage over other molecules within the primordial soup. A good deal of objection to The Selfish Gene stemmed from its failure to be always clear about "selection" and "replication". Our policy towards the use of cookies All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. Include any more information that will help us locate the issue and fix it faster for you. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. An example of such a conflict might be a person using birth control to prevent fertilisation, thereby inhibiting the replication of his or her genes. You can learn more about our use of cookies here. II" PDF. A discussion follows of Axelrod and Hamilton's "Tit for tat" strategy. We use cookies to serve you certain types of ads , including ads relevant to your interests on Book Depository and to work with approved third parties in the process of delivering ad content, including ads relevant to your interests, to measure the effectiveness of their ads, and to perform services on behalf of Book Depository. Coronavirus delivery updates. Mendel's legacy self-replicating automata and artificial life population ecology and chaos random drift and chain reactions population and genetics evolution and sex evolutionary game theory reciprocity and the evolution of cooperation playback. Games of Life Explorations in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior 1st edition Writer Archived from the original on 15 June Richard Dawkins. Karl Sigmund. Biology and Philosophy. No trivia or quizzes yet. The claim is made that these "selfish" actions of genes lead to unselfish actions by organisms. Gene activation depends upon the cellular milieu. The answers, according to this informative and enjoyable volume, can often be found in games like hide and seek, poker, and the prisoner's dilemma. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. This extends, he argues, to the brain 's ability to simulate the world with subjective consciousness , and signalling between species. Evolutionary Game Theory and Population Dynamics. From the gene-centred view, it follows that the more two individuals are genetically related, the more sense at the level of the genes it makes for them to behave selflessly with each other. The distinction is as follows: [43] [44]. Stephen Jay Gould took exception to calling the gene a 'unit of selection' because selection acted only upon phenotypes. Submit report Close. Please try again! Dispatched from the UK in 3 business days When will my order arrive? Unlimited access to over 18 million full-text articles. His contention is that the genes that are passed on are the ones whose evolutionary consequences serve their own implicit interest to continue the anthropomorphism in being replicated, not necessarily those of the organism. This book is at the cross section of biology, information theory, and mathematics and consists essentially of fascinating examples and work done in each field. Description A book accessible to all readers, whatever their level of numeracy Similarly, Dawkins argues, there are conflicts of interest between males and females, but he notes that R. MIT Press. Craig rated it really liked it May 10, Will be a hit for anyone interested in biology, game theory, and mathematics. To ask other readers questions about Games of Life , please sign up. Dawkins vs. Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote. System error. Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals. In raising awareness of Hamilton's ideas, as well as making its own valuable contributions to the field, the book has also stimulated research on human inclusive fitness. Export folders, citations. With the addition of Dawkins's book to the country's consciousness, the term "meme" entered popular culture. This view from is still espoused today, [46] [47] and conflicts with Dawkins' view of "the gene as a form of "information [that] passes through bodies and affects them, but is not affected by them on its way through"". Bert rated it liked it Nov 13, These cookies are necessary to provide our site and services and therefore cannot be disabled. Sign up with Google. Nothing to lose and a whole book of nerd jokes to gain! Home Contact us Help Free delivery worldwide. View 1 excerpt, cites background. Stephen Jay Gould finds Dawkins' position tries to have it both ways: [32]. Original Title. Almost all research in inclusive-fitness theory has been the opposite: hypothesize the key roles of kinship and kin selection, then look for evidence to test that hypothesis. Spen Taylor rated it it was amazing Dec 05, Spencer Bryngelson rated it it was ok Jul 30, Hamilton 's argument for kin selection , that genes for behaviour that improves the survival chances of close relatives can spread in a population, because those relatives carry the same genes. Games of Life Explorations in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior 1st edition Reviews Absolutely awesome. The text was blurry Page doesn't load Other:. We will call it the Replicator. Ashley Poston made her name with Once Upon a Con, a contemporary series set in the world of fandom, and her two-part space opera, Heart of Hamilton and others developed this approach further during the s; they opposed the concepts of group selection and of selection aimed directly at benefit to the individual organism. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Bibliography Political views. Princeton University Press. Edward N. Donald Symons also finds it inappropriate to use anthropomorphism in conveying scientific meaning in general, and particularly for the present instance. About Karl Sigmund. From there, he looks at DNA 's role in evolution , and its organisation into chromosomes and genes , which in his view behave selfishly. Already have an account? See the journals in your area. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue. The Selfish Gene 40th Anniversary ed. System error. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cancel Save settings. The Selfish Gene further popularised sociobiology in Japan after its translation in Create Alert. This playful approach to understanding evolution and its central issues of sex, survival, conflict, and cooperation offers a captivating modern perspective on matters of life and death. How was the reading experience on this article? The view of The Selfish Gene is that selection based upon groups and populations is rare compared to selection on individuals. However, from a comparison with Dawkins' discussion of this very same point, it would seem both Gould's and Dover's comments are more a critique of his sloppy usage than a difference of views. In Keller, Laurent ed. If it had been written by someone with the writing skills of Richard Dawkins then I would probably have given it five stars, but as it is I lost the will to persevere. Dawkins writes that gene combinations which help an organism to survive and reproduce tend to also improve the gene's own chances of being replicated, and, as a result, "successful" genes frequently provide a benefit to the organism. Performance and Analytics. View 1 excerpt, cites background. The book contains no illustrations. It certainly alters the likelihood of events, but a concatenation of contingencies decides what actually occurs. HMo rated it it was amazing Jan 18, Has PDF. According to the ethologist Alan Grafen , acceptance of adaptionist theories is hampered by a lack of a mathematical unifying theory and a belief that anything in words alone must be suspect. In Hull, David L. Retrieved 1 April Friend Reviews. Wilson contends that although the selfish-gene approach was accepted "until [when] Martin Nowak, Corina Tarnita, and I demonstrated that inclusive fitness theory, often called kin selection theory, is both mathematically and biologically incorrect. Wikiquote has quotations related to: The Selfish Gene. The Sunday Times. This edition added two extra chapters, and substantial endnotes to the preceding chapters, reflecting new findings and thoughts. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. In describing genes as being "selfish", Dawkins states unequivocally that he does not intend to imply that they are driven by any motives or will , but merely that their effects can be metaphorically and pedagogically described as if they were. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Let us know here. More generally, the objection has been made that The Selfish Gene discusses philosophical and moral questions that go beyond biological arguments, relying upon anthropomorphisms and careless analogies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Handicap Principle a Missing Piece of DarwinS Puzzle
    Jumping to Bold Conclusions A Review of The Handicap Principle A Missing Piece of Darwins Puzzle by Amotz Zahavi and Avishag Zahavi Oxford University Press Pp $ Seth Bullo ck Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition Max Planck Institute for Human Development Lentzeallee D Berlin Dahlem Tel Fax Email bullockmpibberlinmpgde Occasionally a grazing gazelle notices the approach of a predatory lion Rather than immediately taking ight at top sp eed she often jumps high in the air several times b efore eeing Perhaps these stots are warnings to closeby p ossibly related gazelles If this is the case why is the warning so energetic Surely evolution would favor less exhausting signals since exhaustion is to b e avoided when one is ab out to b e pursued by a predator Amotz and Avishag Zahavi op en their recent b o ok with a dierent explanation for this b ehavior They maintain that the stotting gazelle is not warning consp ecics of danger but informing the lion of its own escap e ability Because the lion has no desire to waste time and energy fruitlessly chasing uncatchable prey this information is of use to it but only if the information is truthful It is here the Zahavis claim that an explanation is to b e found for the otherwise inexplicable brio of the gazelles display The authors construe the stotting display as a handicap a signaling b ehavior that incurs the depletion of the very quality it advertises They interpret the gazelles vigorous leaping to convey the honest message that she is t enough and fast enough to waste just so much
    [Show full text]
  • Indirect Selection and Individual Selection in Sociobiology: My Personal Views on Theories of Social Behaviour
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 65, 859–863 doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2109 ANNIVERSARY ESSAY Indirect selection and individual selection in sociobiology: my personal views on theories of social behaviour AMOTZ ZAHAVI Institute for Nature Conservation Research, Tel-Aviv University (Received 25 September 2002; accepted 4 December 2002; MS. number: AE4) This is the story of my involvement in sociobiological studies. I first discuss group selection models, which were common in the 1950s. I then move on to kin selection and reciprocity models, which were developed to replace group selection models and are still being used by many sociobiologists, even though I argue that they contain the same weaknesses that led group selection to be rejected. As an alternative, I present the handicap principle, an essential component in all signalling. The handicap principle is useful in understanding many components of social systems, not the least of which is why individuals invest in the benefit of other members of a social system (altruism). 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. I have been watching birds since childhood. As a student the kind of questions asked at Oxford at the time: ‘(1) of biology in the early 1950s, I was attracted by the great what is the survival value of the observed behaviour; (2) advances in cell biology and in biochemistry that took what is its causation; (3) how does it develop; and (4) how place at that time. But after spending several months has it evolved?’ Theories that were developed at that time cooped up in a laboratory, I could not resist the temp- to explain the adaptive significance of a particular behav- tation to go out again into the field, looking for rare birds iour did not necessarily seek an ultimate explanation of and watching birds display.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzle of Altruism Reconsidered: Biological Theories of Altruism and One- Shot Altruism
    Ratio Working Paper No. 103 The Puzzle of Altruism Reconsidered: Biological Theories of Altruism and One- Shot Altruism Doron Shultziner Arnon Dattner Box 3203 Besöksadress: ratio.se 103 64 Stockholm Sveavägen 59, 4tr The Puzzle of Altruistic Behavior Reconsidered: Biological Theories of Altruism and One-Shot Altruism By Doron Shultziner, Politics & IR Department, University of Oxford Arnon Dattner, Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University Abstract This paper critically examines the state of the literature in evolutionary biology regarding theories of altruistic behavior. The shared theoretical problems of Kin- selection and Group-selection are examined. Theoretical and severe methodological problems of Reciprocal Altruism theory are also discussed. We offer new conceptual clarifications of the Handicap Principle theory regarding costs and benefits to both the donor and the recipient of an altruistic act. We also summarize supportive empirical studies which demonstrate how Handicap Principle theory easily explains altruistic behavior on a different logic than the one employed by other theories of altruistic behavior. Finally, we discuss the phenomenon of one-shot altruism in order to evaluate, and distinguish between, the predictive and explanatory power of different theories of altruistic behavior. We thank Alan Grafen and Danny Priel for their help in preparing this paper. We are especially grateful to Avishag and Amotz Zahavi for their valuable comments. This paper was presented at the “Trust, Reciprocity and Social Capital: The 2006 Ratio Colloquium for Young Social Scientists” Stockholm, 24th-26th of August 2006. We thank Niclas Berggren and Andreas Bergh of the Ratio Institute for organizing and sponsoring the colloquium which gave us the incentive to write this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Peacock Merely Beautiful Or Also Honest?*
    RESEARCH ARTICLES Is the peacock merely beautiful or also honest?* Raghavendra Gadagkar Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India and Evolutionary and Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, Bangalore 560 064, India natural world. What Darwin had in mind were the con- Darwin proposed the theory of sexual selection to spicuous, extravagant, often cumbersome and almost waste- account for the evolution of extravagant secondary ful, secondary sexual characters seen in males of many sexual characters often seen in males because he argued that utilitarian natural selection cannot permit their animal species—the antlers of many deer, the colours, evolution. Although the idea of sexual selection was calls and displays of many male insects and birds and disbelieved or neglected for a long time, today it con- above all, the train of the peacock. In The Descent of 2 stitutes an active area of research. Starting with Dar- Man and Selection in Relation to Sex , Darwin argued win, the enormous, cumbersome train of the peacock that such characters could not have been shaped by natu- has been the prime example of sexually selected traits. ral selection as they were likely to be detrimental to the And yet, almost nothing relevant to sexual selection survival of their bearers, being wasteful in terms of was known about the peacock until very recently. In resources and energy and making them more vulnerable the last ten years or so, observations and experiments to predators. To account for such characters, Darwin pro- on a free-ranging, feral population of the Indian pea- posed the theory of Sexual Selection that he said operates cock in the Whipsnade Park in Bedfordshire in the because of ‘the advantage which certain individuals have UK and some experiments in a commercial peacock farm that breeds birds for food and as show birds, by over other individuals of the same sex and species, in Marion Petrie and her colleagues have finally justified exclusive relation to reproduction’.
    [Show full text]
  • AMOTZ ZAHAVI 1928–2017 Arnon Lotema, Stephen I
    Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22244662-06301010 AMOTZ ZAHAVI 1928–2017 Arnon Lotema, Stephen I. Rothsteinb and Yoram Yom-Tova aSchool of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University bDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara The authors thank Naomi Paz for English editing and Avishag Kadman-Zahavi for comments. Last May (2017) Professor Amotz Zahavi passed away. He was known to many as a founder of the Society for the Pro- tection of Nature in Israel and as a scientist who introduced to the world the Handicap Principle. Amotz had indeed a personality that is hard to sum up in words. He combined levels of determination, vision, leadership, outstanding originality, clarity of observation and intuition with which few are favoured. Within the scientific community outside of Israel, not many knew of his lifetime dedication to the conservation of nature; and few among the nature lovers in Israel were aware of the depth of his contributions to the world of science. Those who did know him personally knew that this combination constituted one more aspect that made Amotz such a unique and special individual. First steps Amotz Zahavi was born on August 14, 1928, in Petach Tikva, a town founded in 1878 as one of the first two settlements established by Jews in the Land of Israel in the early years of the Zionist Movement. According to his mother, he would watch the birds in the garden even be- fore he learned to talk, and throughout his childhood he wandered around the settlement and its environment fol- lowing the birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Games in the Philosophy of Biology
    Games in the Philosophy of Biology Cailin O'Connor July 20, 2019 2 Chapter 1 Introduction A male peacock mantis shrimp resides happily in his burrow. He has recently molted, leaving his shell soft and vulnerable. As he waits, another male wanders onto his territory and approaches. The new male would like a burrow of his own. Both possess raptorial claws powerful enough to smash through the glass of an aquarium. If they fight for the territory, the temporarily squishy burrow owner will be seriously hurt. Neither, though, can directly observe whether the other has molted recently. Both mantis shrimp raise their appendages to display brightly colored `meral spots', intended to signal their aggression and strength. The intruder is impressed, and backs off to seek territory elsewhere. Alex is looking to hire a new data analyst for his company. Annaleigh wants the job, and so is keen to impress Alex. She includes every accomplishment she can think of on her resume. Since she went to a prestigious college, she makes sure her educational background is front and center where Alex will see it first. A group of vampire bats need to eat nightly to maintain their strength. This is not always easy, however. Sometimes a bat will hunt all night but fail to find a meal. For this reason, most bats in the group have established relationships for reciprocal food sharing. Bats who manage to feed will regurgitate blood for partners who did not. Mitzi needs a kidney transplant, but is too old to go on the normal donor list.
    [Show full text]
  • Altruism As a Handicap: the Limitations of Kin Selection and Reciprocity Amotz Zahavi Journal of Avian Biology, Vol. 26, No. 1
    Altruism as a Handicap: The Limitations of Kin Selection and Reciprocity Amotz Zahavi Journal of Avian Biology, Vol. 26, No. 1. (Mar., 1995), pp. 1-3. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0908-8857%28199503%2926%3A1%3C1%3AAAAHTL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q Journal of Avian Biology is currently published by Nordic Society Oikos. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/oikos.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu Oct 25 02:30:12 2007 Ahism as a handicap - the limitahns of kin selection and reciprocity Amotz Zahavi, Inst.
    [Show full text]
  • "Costly Signaling in Human Culture" In
    Costly Signaling in Human Culture JOHN H. SHAVER1 AND RICHARD SOSIS2 1University of Otago, New Zealand 2University of Connecticut, United States Social scientists have long sought to explain seemingly inefficient and maladaptive aspectsofhumanbehavior.Acrosstheworld’scultures,peoplegiveawayfoodwithout expectation of reciprocity, engage in nonoptimal foraging activities, spend time and energy enduring dangerous and painful religious rites, and add functionless ornamen- tationtomaterialobjectsandarchitecture.Thesebehaviorsareespeciallyperplexing to evolutionary scientists, who assume that selection processes result in phenotypes that maximize somatic and reproductive effort. Rather than viewing such behaviors as maladaptive, however, evolutionary anthropologists and archaeologists interpret the wastefulness of these behaviors as enabling reliable and honest communication between individuals with at least partially conflicting interests. Originating with the insights of evolutionary biologist Amotz Zahavi (1975), costly signaling theory (CST) was first used to interpret many of the extravagant behavioral displays and excessive ornamentation found throughout the animal kingdom, such as malereddeerroaring,meral-spreaddisplaysofstomatopods,andlargeantlersamong males of many species. For example, upon spotting a predator (most commonly African wild dogs), Thomson’s gazelles (Eudorcas thomsonii) leap straight up in the air with their backs arched rather than immediately running away. This conspicuous jumping behavior, known as “stotting,” appears to be detrimental to a gazelle’s survival since it likely captures the predator’s attention and requires an expenditure of energy that cannot be used for fleeing. Individual gazelles range in their fitness and their ability to escape predators, and healthy gazelles would do better to not have to bother to flee. Conversely, predators would do better to not have to expend energy chasing a healthy gazelle, when chasing a less fit gazelle would offer a greater net energetic return.
    [Show full text]
  • Amotz Zahavi Tales of a Swamp and Peacock Tails
    ARTICLE-IN-A-BOX Amotz Zahavi Tales of a Swamp and Peacock Tails On the 12th of May 2017, the scientific world lost a pioneer, a scientist extraordinaire, and nature conservator – Amotz Zahavi. Zahavi was an Israeli evolutionary biologist and Professor of Zoology at the Tel Aviv University. Zahavi combined outstanding research in evolutionary biology and animal behaviour with environmental actions. He was known in the scientific circles for his nonconformist ideas that not only stimulated scientific debates on sociobiology and signal evolution but also often provided alternative and more accurate explanations to long- standing paradoxes. Unfortunately, some of the most fundamental ideas Zahavi proposed were almost unanimously rejected by his peers only to be eventually, and almost without exception, accepted by all, including his critics. This should give some hope to the Zahavis in the making. Zahavi also played a pivotal role as a conservationist towards saving the wilderness of Israel, an aspect that has been overshadowed by his more fundamental work. This article will try to find a balance between the two. Early Life and Formative Years Born on 14th August 1928 in a town called Petah Tikva (meaning ‘opening of hope’), 10 km east of Tel Aviv and what was then part of Mandatory Palestine, Zahavi was a bird watcher and nature lover even in his early years. While he nurtured his love for ornithology, he wanted to study agriculture and become a farmer and settle as part of a communal settlement (Kibbutz). However, Prof. Heinrich Mendelssohn at the Biological Institute in Tel Aviv, under whose supervision he later did both his MSc and PhD persuaded him to study biology instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin's Sexual Selection Theory – a Forgotten Idea
    Darwin’s sexual selection theory – a forgotten idea Paulo Gama Mota Departamento de Ciências da Vida Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal [email protected] Resumo A teoria de selecção sexual de Darwin é muito menos conhecida que a teoria de selecção natural e permaneceu praticamente desconhecida durante cerca de um século. Sendo hoje uma das teorias científicas mais prolíficas na biologia, é muito interessante, científica e epistemologicamente, entender porque permaneceu ignorada durante tanto tempo. Proponho que uma parte do seu abandono inicial teve, em parte, a ver com preconceitos sociais da época. Mas, porventura a razão mais significativa teve a ver com a dificuldade do conceito. Foi necessário um importante desenvolvimento teórico com a introdução de um pensamento populacional, que já estava presente em Darwin, e uma perspectiva de evolução centrada no gene, a par de desenvolvimentos formais, como a teoria de jogos, para se tornar possível desenvolverem e testar hipóteses que confirmassem a teoria. Nesta perspectiva, a visão de Darwin adquire uma dimensão ainda mais extraordinária. Palavras-chave Darwin; selecção sexual; teoria científica; teoria de jogos; evolução. Abstract Darwin’s theory of sexual selection is much less known that his theory of natural selection, and remained mostly ignored for more than a century. Being today one of the most productive theories in biology, it is quite interesting to understand why it remained ignored for so long. I propose that part of its initial rejection had to do with social preconceptions. But, the most likely reason for being neglected had to do with the difficulty of the concept. A considerable theoretical development with the introduction of populational thinking, already present in Darwin, with a gene-centered view of evolution, and the development of new formal tools such as game theory were needed in order to put the theory under test.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Over Guarding in the Arabian Babbler
    F1000Research 2015, 4:618 Last updated: 16 MAY 2019 RESEARCH ARTICLE Competition over guarding in the Arabian babbler (Turdoides squamiceps), a cooperative breeder [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] Arnon Dattner1, Amotz Zahavi2, Avishag Zahavi3 1Free environmental education in Nicaragua, SONATI, León, Nicaragua 2Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel 3ARO The Vulcani Center, Bet-Dagan, Israel First published: 24 Aug 2015, 4:618 ( Open Peer Review v1 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6739.1) Latest published: 04 Feb 2016, 4:618 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6739.2) Reviewer Status Abstract Invited Reviewers Observations on 12 groups comprised of two adult males and one adult 1 2 3 female (some included one or two fledglings), tame, individually marked, Arabian babblers (Turdoides squamiceps) in the rift valley in Israel revealed that the babblers compete to guard. The pattern of guarding and the way by version 2 report which one sentinel replaces another reflect the dominance relationships published within the group. The dominant (alpha) male guarded more than any other 04 Feb 2016 individual. It interfered with and replaced the guarding by the adult beta male more than it did with the yearlings. About one-third of the version 1 replacements occurred less than one minute after the sentinel had published report report report assumed guarding. Whereas the dominant often replaced its subordinates 24 Aug 2015 directly; subordinates hardly ever replaced their dominants directly. The alpha male often allofed the beta male during the replacement. Uzi Motro, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Replacements and allofeeding of the beta males by the alpha males 1 increased significantly during courtship, when competition over breeding Jerusalem, Israel was maximal, and dropped back to their previous level at the start of 2 Stephen Rothstein, University of California, incubation, highlighting the competitive basis underlying the act of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, USA guarding.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Theory and the Evolution of Signaling
    Signaling and Game Theory Pure Common Interest Partial Common Interest Game Theory and the Evolution of Signaling Kevin J.S. Zollman Carnegie Mellon University Formal Epistemology Workshop Kevin J.S. Zollman Signaling Signaling and Game Theory Introduction Pure Common Interest Methodologies in game theory Partial Common Interest Signaling is everywhere Kevin J.S. Zollman Signaling Signaling and Game Theory Introduction Pure Common Interest Methodologies in game theory Partial Common Interest Philosophical/Scientific questions 1 Why is signaling stable? 2 How can reliable signaling come to emerge? Under what conditions? What learning/evolutionary processes? Is there a difference in efficiency among different situations/processes? 3 What is the correct methodology? 4 What constitutes signaling? How can it be distinguished from other phenomena? 5 Is there continuity (or similarity) between human language and this type of signaling? Do animal signals have meaning? Can animals have {grammar, pragmatic distinctions, reference, etc.}? Is there deception? Kevin J.S. Zollman Signaling Signaling and Game Theory Introduction Pure Common Interest Methodologies in game theory Partial Common Interest The static methodology Construct a game Find its equilibria Kevin J.S. Zollman Signaling Signaling and Game Theory Introduction Pure Common Interest Methodologies in game theory Partial Common Interest The dynamic methodology Construct a game Describe a mechanism for strategy revision Find the long run outcomes of this system Kevin J.S. Zollman Signaling Signaling and Game Theory The Lewis signaling game Pure Common Interest Analysis of common interest Partial Common Interest Signaling is everywhere Kevin J.S. Zollman Signaling Signaling and Game Theory The Lewis signaling game Pure Common Interest Analysis of common interest Partial Common Interest Lewis signaling game Kevin J.S.
    [Show full text]