Cell Reports Resource Stress-Independent Activation of XBP1s and/or ATF6 Reveals Three Functionally Diverse ER Proteostasis Environments Matthew D. Shoulders,1,5 Lisa M. Ryno,1 Joseph C. Genereux,1 James J. Moresco,2 Patricia G. Tu,2 Chunlei Wu,3 John R. Yates III,2 Andrew I. Su,3 Jeffery W. Kelly,1,3,4 and R. Luke Wiseman2,3,* 1Department of Chemistry 2Department of Chemical Physiology 3Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine 4The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA 5Present address: Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA *Correspondence:
[email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.024 SUMMARY ensuring that only folded, functional proteins are trafficked from the ER (Brodsky and Skach, 2011; Smith et al., 2011b; The unfolded protein response (UPR) maintains Wiseman et al., 2007). endoplasmic reticulum (ER) proteostasis through The folding, trafficking, and degradation capacity of the ER is the activation of transcription factors such as dynamically adjusted to meet demand by the unfolded protein XBP1s and ATF6. The functional consequences of response (UPR)—a stress-responsive signaling pathway these transcription factors for ER proteostasis comprising three integrated signaling cascades emanating remain poorly defined. Here, we describe methodol- from the ER transmembrane proteins IRE1, ATF6, and PERK (Schro¨ der and Kaufman, 2005; Walter and Ron, 2011). UPR ogy that enables orthogonal, small-molecule- signaling is activated by the accumulation of misfolded or aggre- mediated activation of the UPR-associated tran- gated proteins within the ER lumen.