Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation's Estuaries: a Decade Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation's Estuaries: a Decade Of effectsEXHIBIT of nutrient enrichment10 (AR in L.3)the nation’s estuaries: a decade of change Overall eutrophic condition unique feature, as all other regions have at least one estuary with a high rating. One system was classified • This is the least impacted region; no North as having moderate high eutrophic conditions, with Atlantic systems had high overall eutrophic chlorophyll a and nuisance/toxic blooms as the major condition (OEC). contributing symptoms. • The majority of systems had a moderate or low OEC. One notable characteristic in systems of this • There was some cause for concern for region is the annual occurrence of nuisance/toxic chlorophyll a and macroalgae. blooms, which cause shellfish bed closures. �owever, • Toxic offshore blooms which leave cysts (potential for systems such as Massachusetts, Cape Cod, Saco, future blooms) were an emerging issue. and Casco Bays, these blooms originate offshore and are advected into the systems. For this reason, the nuisance/toxic bloom rating for these systems The North Atlantic region is the least eutrophic has been adjusted to low since the blooms do not region in the nation, with the majority of systems originate within the system. An emerging issue is the having moderate or low overall eutrophic condition possibility that these blooms, mostly of Alexandrium (Figure 4.3a-b). Furthermore, no estuaries in this spp., may eventually originate within estuaries, due to region recorded high overall eutrophic condition—a cysts that have settled in the estuarine sediments. Figure 4.3. (a) Map of overall eutrophic condition (OEC) and (b) the combination of individual eutrophic symptoms which constitute OEC ratings in the North Atlantic region. a) Overall eutrophic condition 1. St. Croix R./Cobscook Bay 2. Englishman Bay 3. Narraguagus Bay 4. Blue Hill Bay 5. Penobscot Bay 6. Muscongus Bay 7. Damariscotta River 1 8. Sheepscot Bay 9. Kennebec/Androscoggin R. 10. Casco Bay 2 11. Saco Bay 3 12. Wells Bay 13. Great Bay 14. Hampton Harbor Estuary 4 15. Merrimack River 5 16. Plum Island Sound 17. Massachusetts Bay 18. Boston Harbor 6 9 7 19. Cape Cod Bay Eutrophic condition and trends 20. Waquoit Bay 8 10 High: symptoms generally occur periodically or persistently and/or over extensive area. 11 Moderate high: symptoms generally occur less 12 regularly and/or over medium to extensive area. Moderate: symptoms generally occur less 13 regularly and/or over medium area. 14 Moderate low: symptoms generally occur episodically and/or over small to medium area. 15 16 Low: few symptoms occur at more than minimal levels. 17 0 50 100 18 Unknown: Insufficient data for analysis. Kilometers Miles 0 25 50 19 Symptoms improved since 1999 assessment. No change in symptoms since 1999 assessment. 20 Symptoms worsened since 1999 assessment. Insufficient data to show trend. 42 EXHIBIT 10 (AR L.3) Chapter 4 • regional summaries • north atlantic The overall confidence in the assessments for this vegetation (SAV) were low in all eight systems for which region is low due to almost a third of the systems there were data. (eight) having inadequate data for assessment. Where data were available, confidence is moderate to high. Changes in eutrophic condition since the 1990s Overall eutrophic conditions worsened in two systems, Eutrophic symptom expressions improved in three systems, and did not change in five Systems with moderate or moderate high overall when compared to the 1999 report (Figure 4.3a-b). eutrophic condition were characterized by having one Chlorophyll a changed in more systems than any of high symptom expression, which in this region was the other symptoms, showing improvements in four most often chlorophyll a and macroalgae. systems and worsening conditions in three systems. Of While most estuaries had one high symptom the data available, dissolved oxygen displayed the least expression, the majority of symptom expressions were amount of change. low. For the primary symptoms, chlorophyll a was Of particular interest is the improvement of expressed as low in seven of the eleven estuaries for eutrophic condition in Boston �arbor, which had which the symptom was reported. Similarly, moderate high eutrophic status in the 1990s, but macroalgae symptom expressions were low in five of currently has a rating of low. All symptom the ten reported estuaries. For the secondary improvements were attributed to sewage treatment symptoms, dissolved oxygen problems were low in all upgrades and the move of the wastewater outfall from twelve systems, and losses of submerged aquatic the harbor into Massachusetts Bay. b) Overall eutrophic condition & eutrophic symptoms a Overall eutrophic condition Overall confidence expression Chlorophyll Macroalgae Dissolved oxygen Nuisance/toxic blooms SAV Estuary 1. St. Croix R./Cobscook Bay 2. Englishman Bay 3. Narraguagus Bay 4. Blue Hill Bay Eutrophic condition 5. Penobscot Bay in 2004 6. Muscongus Bay High Moderate high 7. Damariscotta River Moderate 8. Sheepscot Bay Moderate low 9. Kennebec/Androscoggin R. Low 10. Casco Bay Insufficient data 11. Saco Bay Overall confidence expression in 2004 12. Wells Bay High 13. Great Bay Moderate 14. Hampton Harbor Estuary Low 15. Merrimack River Change in eutrophic condition since 1999 16. Plum Island Sound assessment 17. Massachusetts Bay Improved 18. Boston Harbor No change 19. Cape Cod Bay Worsened 20. Waquoit Bay Insufficient data 43 effectsEXHIBIT of nutrient enrichment10 (AR in L.3)the nation’s estuaries: a decade of change Future outlook surfaces, and fertilizer use. For all systems, an • There was a bleak outlook for future conditions; increase in coastal population (affecting land use most systems for which an evaluation was made distribution and subsequent nutrient loads) is likely were expected to worsen in the future. to augment nutrient loads from all of these sources. • The future outlook has not changed from the Though it is premature to make conclusions about early 1990s. the accuracy of the 1999 assessment’s future outlook, in six out of nine systems (for which comparison could be made), actual changes trended in the same The overall future outlook for the North Atlantic direction as predicted. Worsening conditions due region predicts worsening conditions. Eutrophication to increased nutrient loads are expected in Boston symptoms were predicted to worsen in nine of the �arbor, Great Bay, Plum Island Sound, and Cape Cod assessed systems and to improve in only two (Figure Bay (Figure 4.4). Conversely, loads to St. Croix River/ 4.4). For the nine systems expected to worsen, Cobscook Bay and Massachusetts Bay are expected to nutrient loads are anticipated to increase due to decrease due to improvements in onsite septic tanks, wastewater treatment, urban runoff, onsite septic storm water management, restoration of eroding tanks, combined sewer overflow (Cape Cod Bay stream beds, and a reduction in salmon aquaculture. only), atmospheric deposition, increasing impervious These changes are expected to occur by 2020. Figure 4.4. Future outlook in 2004 and comparison with 1999 future outlook. Future outlook in 2004 Future outlook comparisons Future Actual change Future outlook in eutrophic outlook in 2004 condition in 1999 (1999–2004) 1 Estuary 1. St. Croix R./Cobscook Bay 2 2. Englishman Bay 3 3. Narraguagus Bay 4 4. Blue Hill Bay 5 5. Penobscot Bay 6 6. Muscongus Bay 9 7 7. Damariscotta River 8 10 Future outlook 8. Sheepscot Bay 9. Kennebec/Androscoggin R. 11 Large deterioration 10. Casco Bay 12 Small deterioration 11. Saco Bay 13 No change Small improvement 12. Wells Bay 14 Large improvement 13. Great Bay 15 16 Insufficient data 14. Hampton Harbor Estuary 17 Change in eutrophic 15. Merrimack River 18 condition since 1999 16. Plum Island Sound assessment 19 Improved 17. Massachusetts Bay 0 50 100 No change 18. Boston Harbor Kilometers 20 Miles Worsened 19. Cape Cod Bay 0 25 50 Insufficient data 20. Waquoit Bay 44 EXHIBIT 10 (AR L.3) Chapter 4 • regional summaries • north atlantic National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Oceanic and Atmospheric National Fishing boats tied up at the Portland Marine Trade Center in Portland, Maine. Monitoring use impairments is important to understanding how eutrophication influences commercial and recreational fishing. Assessment of Estuarine Trophic Status (ASSETS) (combination of WWTP and sewer overflow), and There were seven systems for which anASSETS rating urban runoff. �owever, this information was available (combination of influencing factors, overall eutrophic for only five of the twenty systems. condition, and future outlook) could be made. Two Use impairments were reported for six systems systems were rated as good (Boston �arbor, Blue �ill (Damariscotta River, Great Bay, �ampton �arbor, Bay), four were rated as moderate (St. Croix River/ Boston �arbor, Cape Cod Bay, Waquoit Bay) with Cobscook Bay, Great Bay, Massachusetts Bay, and the most frequently noted impairment being shellfish Waquoit Bay), and one as poor (Plum Island Sound). harvesting. Other impacts include recreational and commercial fishing and fish consumption, aesthetics, Impaired uses and swimming. There does not seem to be a clear correlation • Three systems had impaired livingresources. between the level of overall eutrophic condition and • Causes of impairments were reported as river input, impacts to living resources. For instance, Waquoit wastewater treatment, combined sewer outflow, Bay (moderate OEC) had considerably impacted urban runoff, fertilizer, and onsite septics. living resources while St. Croix River/Cobscook
Recommended publications
  • Saco River Saco & Biddeford, Maine
    Environmental Assessment Finding of No Significant Impact, and Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation for Maintenance Dredging DRAFT Saco River Saco & Biddeford, Maine US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS New England District March 2016 Draft Environmental Assessment: Saco River FNP DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation Saco River Saco & Biddeford, Maine FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT MAINTENANCE DREDGING March 2016 New England District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 696 Virginia Rd Concord, Massachusetts 01742-2751 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT HISTORY, NEED, AND AUTHORITY .......................................... 1 3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................... 3 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................ 6 4.1 No Action Alternative ..................................................................................... 6 4.2 Maintaining Channel at Authorized Dimensions............................................. 6 4.3 Alternative Dredging Methods ........................................................................ 6 4.3.1 Hydraulic Cutterhead Dredge....................................................................... 7 4.3.2 Hopper Dredge ........................................................................................... 7 4.3.3 Mechanical Dredge ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Columbia Falls, Maine Comprehensive Plan 2019
    TOWN OF COLUMBIA FALLS, MAINE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2019 Prepared by the Columbia Falls Comprehensive Plan Committee: Nancy Bagley Grace Falzarano Tony Santiago Philip Worcester Shelby Greene Jeff Greene David Perham Debi Beal Consultant: Washington County Council of Governments Table of Contents Chapter A. Executive Summary And Community Vision Chapter B. Public Opinion Survey Chapter C. Gis Mapping Chapter D. Historical And Archaeological Resources Chapter E. Population Chapter F. Natural Resources Chapter G. Employment And Economy Chapter H. Housing Chapter I. Public Facilities, Services, And Recreation Chapter J. Transportation Chapter K. Fiscal Capacity Chapter L. Regional Coordination Chapter M. Land Use Chapter N. Policies And Implementation Strategies Appendix A. Public Opinion Survey & Written Comments Appendix B. State Policies Appendix C. Evaluation Measures Appendix D. Maine’s Growth Management Legislation Appendix E. Affordable Housing And Elder Care Remedies Appendix F. 2002 Policies And Implementation Strategies CHAPTER A. VISION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. VISION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Comprehensive planning demonstrates the importance of land use standards for Columbia Falls. Preserving and protecting the character of Columbia Falls is vital to the continued stability of the local economy and to the happiness and wellbeing of the townspeople. Consistent with the provisions of the Growth Management Legislation, Columbia Falls’ Comprehensive Plan has attempted to recognize the value of land use standards, to incorporate the desires of the community, and to preserve and protect the integrity of Columbia Falls. All of this is done so as to continue to make Columbia Falls a great place to live, work and vacation. The Town of Columbia Falls adopted its last Comprehensive Plan in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan Vol. 1, Part 4
    Vol. I, 2009 Edgecomb Comprehensive Plan 24 PART 4 NATURAL RESOURCES CRITICAL NATURAL RESOURCES MAINE’S GROWTH MANAGEMENT GOAL To protect the state's other critical natural resources, including without limitation, wetlands, wildlife and fisheries habitat, sand dunes, shorelands, scenic vistas, and unique natural areas. TOWN VISION To protect Edgecomb’s critical natural resources within and surrounding Edgecomb’s privately- owned undeveloped and unfragmented lands; Edgecomb’s only great pond, Lily Pond; the town- owned Charles and Constance Schmid Land Preserve as well as Edgecomb’s tidal frontage and its scenic vistas. CITIZENS’ VIEW (SURVEY RESPONSE) ● 58%, or 205 respondents, choose to live in Edgecomb because of its proximity to water, clear skies and starry nights. ● 54%, or 177 respondents, enjoy the respect for privacy in Edgecomb. Unfragmented Parcels ● 71%, or 253 respondents, defined rural as (Source: Beginning with Habitat) “the bulk of our land remaining undeveloped, with large tracts of backland, fields and forests.” ● 28%, or 94 respondents, objected to forestry operations “in their back yard.” ● 54%, or 191 respondents, felt that nature preserves are an acceptable trade-off for lost tax revenue. CONDITIONS AND TRENDS The topography of the upper part of the peninsula comprising the Town of Edgecomb is typical of Maine coastline peninsulas. A gently rolling landscape of rocky, clay soil, remaining from land which was heavily wooded before clearing and settlement of the 18th century, is laid over a granite skeleton. A mixture of second and third growth woodland is broken by the pattern of open fields surviving from 18th and 19th century farms when agriculture and fishing were the major sources of livelihood for inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdiction Project No Title Status Summary of Objectives Research
    Jurisdiction Project Title Status Summary of Objectives Research Dates Topic Area Objective/Issue Area of Research Collaborating Coordinating Annual No Countries Scientist Expenditure Canada C1 Marine migration and Completed Provide knowledge about marine habitat 2001 - 2003 Distribution/ Migratory behaviour of Bay of Fundy and Gulf of USA Gilles L Lacroix survival of post-smolt (migration routes and feeding grounds) used by migration in the individual fish Maine Atlantic salmon from Bay of salmon post-smolts from Bay of Fundy rivers. sea Fundy rivers Determine the location, timing and extent of salmon post-smolt mortality at sea. Investigate the causes and mechanisms of marine mortality of salmon post-smolts. Provide information to fuel the recovery programme for inner Bay of Fundy salmon stocks. Canada C2 Distribution, health and Completed Provide knowledge about marine habitat and 2002 - 2004 Distribution/ Distribution of salmon in Bay of Fundy and Gulf of USA and Norway Gilles L Lacroix condition of Atlantic salmon health of salmon post-smolts from Bay of Fundy migration in the the sea Maine from Bay of Fundy rivers rivers. Investigate the causes and mechanisms of sea while at sea marine mortality of salmon post-smolts. Provide information to fuel the recovery programme for inner Bay of Fundy salmon stocks. Canada C3 Marine migration and Completed Provide knowledge of the marine habitat 2005 - 2006 Distribution/ Migratory behaviour of Saint-Jean River, Gaspé Julian Dodson, survival of post-smolt (migration routes and feeding grounds) used by migration in the individual fish Peninsula, Quebec François Caron Atlantic salmon from the salmon post-smolts from Bay of Gaspé rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Casco Bay Weekly : 13 July 1989
    Portland Public Library Portland Public Library Digital Commons Casco Bay Weekly (1989) Casco Bay Weekly 7-13-1989 Casco Bay Weekly : 13 July 1989 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.portlandlibrary.com/cbw_1989 Recommended Citation "Casco Bay Weekly : 13 July 1989" (1989). Casco Bay Weekly (1989). 28. http://digitalcommons.portlandlibrary.com/cbw_1989/28 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Casco Bay Weekly at Portland Public Library Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Casco Bay Weekly (1989) by an authorized administrator of Portland Public Library Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greater Portland's news and arts weekly JULY 13, 1989 FREE ... that don't make THE NEWS (OYER STOll by Kelly Nelson PHOTOS by Tonet! Harbert One night last April Michael Metevier got off work at midnight and headed over to Raoul's to hear some blues. An hour later he was cruising home, feeling good. His tune changed when he got home. His door was smashed open. The lock lay useless on the floor. The lights were -. glaring. "It was quite a bunch of mixed emotions - shock and being violated. I was kind of in a daze," says Metevier of finding his home burglarized. He didn't sleep well that night. He kept thinking that someone he didn't know had been in his home - and had stolen his telephone, answering machine, flashlight, calculator, candy dish, towel!! and electric shaver. You probably heard every gory detail of the four murders in the Portland area last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Narraguagus River Water Quality Monitoring Plan
    Narraguagus River Water Quality Monitoring Plan A Guide for Coordinated Water Quality Monitoring Efforts in an Atlantic Salmon Watershed in Maine By Barbara S. Arter BSA Environmental Consulting And Barbara Snapp, Ph. D. January 2006 Sponsored By The Narraguagus River Watershed Council Funded By The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Narraguagus River Water Quality Monitoring Plan A Guide for Coordinated Water Quality Monitoring Efforts in an Atlantic Salmon Watershed in Maine By Barbara S. Arter BSA Environmental Consulting And Barbara Snapp, Ph. D. January 2006 Sponsored By The Narraguagus River Watershed Council Funded By The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Narraguagus River Water Quality Monitoring Plan Preface In an effort to enhance water quality monitoring (WQM) coordination among agencies and conservation organizations, the Project SHARE Research and Management Committee initiated a program whereby river-specific WQM Plans are developed for Maine rivers that currently contain Atlantic salmon populations listed in the Endangered Species Act. The Sheepscot River WQM Plan was the first plan to be developed under this initiative. It was developed between May 2003 and June 2004. The Action Items were finalized and the document signed in March 2005 (Arter, 2005). The Narraguagus River WQM Plan is the second such plan and was produced by a workgroup comprised of representatives from both state and federal government agencies and several conservation organizations (see Acknowledgments). The purpose of this plan is to characterize current WQM activities, describe current water quality trends, identify the role of each monitoring agency, and make recommendations for future monitoring. The project was funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1982 Maine River's Study Appendix H - Rivers with Historical Landmarks & Register Sites
    1982 Maine River's Study Appendix H - Rivers with Historical Landmarks & Register Sites HISTORI RIVER NAME HISTORIC SITE/PLACE C COUNTY LOCATION LINK Androscoggin River Pejepscot Paper Mill RHP Sagadahoc Topsham https://www.mainememory.net/sitebuilder/site/201/page/460/display Androscoggin River Barker Mill RHP Androscoggin Auburn https://tinyurl.com/y8wsy2a6 Bagaduce River Fort George RHP Hancock Castine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_George_(Castine,_Maine) Carrabasset River (Lemon Stream) New Portland Wire Bridge RHP Somerset New Portland http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/otherbridges/wirebridge/index.shtml Damariscotta Oyster Shell Heaps (Whaleback) Damariscotta River RHP Lincoln Damariscotta http://tinyurl.com/m9vgk84 Kennebec Franklin Dead River Dead River Arnold Trail to Quebec RHP Somerset Chain of Ponds http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Arnold%27s_expedition_to_Quebec Ellis River Lovejoy Bridge RHP Oxford South Andover http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/coveredbridges/lovejoybridge/ Kenduskeag Stream Robyville Bridge RHP Penobscot Bangor http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/coveredbridges/robyvillebridge/ Kenduskeag Stream Morse Bridge RHP Penobscot Bangor http://bangorinfo.com/Focus/focus_kenduskeag_stream.html Kennebec River Fort Baldwin RHP Sagadahoc Popham Beach http://www.maine.gov/cgi-bin/online/doc/parksearch/details.pl?park_id=86 Kennebec River Fort Popham RHP Sagadahoc Popham Beach http://www.fortwiki.com/Fort_Popham Percy and Small Shipyard Kennebec River Maritime Museum District* RHP Sagadahoc
    [Show full text]
  • 1.NO-ATL Cover
    EXHIBIT 20 (AR L.29) NOAA's Estuarine Eutrophication Survey Volume 3: North Atlantic Region July 1997 Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce EXHIBIT 20 (AR L.29) The National Estuarine Inventory The National Estuarine Inventory (NEI) represents a series of activities conducted since the early 1980s by NOAA’s Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment (ORCA) to define the nation’s estuarine resource base and develop a national assessment capability. Over 120 estuaries are included (Appendix 3), representing over 90 percent of the estuarine surface water and freshwater inflow to the coastal regions of the contiguous United States. Each estuary is defined spatially by an estuarine drainage area (EDA)—the land and water area of a watershed that directly affects the estuary. The EDAs provide a framework for organizing information and for conducting analyses between and among systems. To date, ORCA has compiled a broad base of descriptive and analytical information for the NEI. Descriptive topics include physical and hydrologic characteristics, distribution and abundance of selected fishes and inver- tebrates, trends in human population, building permits, coastal recreation, coastal wetlands, classified shellfish growing waters, organic and inorganic pollutants in fish tissues and sediments, point and nonpoint pollution for selected parameters, and pesticide use. Analytical topics include relative susceptibility to nutrient discharges, structure and variability of salinity, habitat suitability modeling, and socioeconomic assessments. For a list of publications or more information about the NEI, contact C. John Klein, Chief, Physical Environ- ments Characterization Branch, at the address below.
    [Show full text]
  • A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire New Hampshire Estuaries Project
    AR-293 University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository PREP Publications Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership 2000 A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire New Hampshire Estuaries Project Stephen H. Jones University of New Hampshire Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.unh.edu/prep Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation New Hampshire Estuaries Project and Jones, Stephen H., "A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire" (2000). PREP Publications. Paper 294. http://scholars.unh.edu/prep/294 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in PREP Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire Published by the New Hampshire Estuaries Project Edited by Dr. Stephen H. Jones Jackson estuarine Laboratory, university of New Hampshire Durham, NH 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................i LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford Biddeford, Maine
    FINAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact and Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation for Maintenance Dredging Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford Biddeford, Maine May 2020 FINAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This page intentionally left blank ii FINAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................ 5 2.0 Authority and Dredge History .......................................................................................... 9 3.0 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 No Action Alternative .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Oysters in Maine (1600S-1970S) Randy Lackovic University of Maine, [email protected]
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Darling Marine Center Historical Documents Darling Marine Center Historical Collections 3-2019 A History of Oysters in Maine (1600s-1970s) Randy Lackovic University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/dmc_documents Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Lackovic, Randy, "A History of Oysters in Maine (1600s-1970s)" (2019). Darling Marine Center Historical Documents. 22. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/dmc_documents/22 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Darling Marine Center Historical Documents by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A History of Oysters in Maine (1600s-1970s) This is a history of oyster abundance in Maine, and the subsequent decline of oyster abundance. It is a history of oystering, oyster fisheries, and oyster commerce in Maine. It is a history of the transplanting of oysters to Maine, and experiments with oysters in Maine, and of oyster culture in Maine. This history takes place from the 1600s to the 1970s. 17th Century {}{}{}{} In early days, oysters were to be found in lavish abundance along all the Atlantic coast, though Ingersoll says it was at least a small number of oysters on the Gulf of Maine coast.86, 87 Champlain wrote that in 1604, "All the harbors, bays, and coasts from Chouacoet (Saco) are filled with every variety of fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Larval Fish Abundance in Penobscot Bay, Maine
    81 Abstract–Biweekly ichthyoplankton Dynamics of larval fi sh abundance surveys were conducted in Penobscot Bay, Maine, during the spring and early in Penobscot Bay, Maine summer of 1997 and 1998. Larvae from demersal eggs dominated the catch from late winter through spring, but Mark A. Lazzari not in early summer collections. Larval Maine Department of Marine Resources fi sh assemblages varied with tempera- P.O. Box 8 ture, and to a lesser extent, plankton West Boothbay Harbor, Maine 04575 volume, and salinity, among months. E-mail address: [email protected] Temporal patterns of larval fi sh abun- dance corresponded with seasonality of reproduction. Larvae of taxa that spawn from late winter through early spring, such as sculpins (Myoxocepha- lus spp.), sand lance (Ammodytes sp.), and rock gunnel (Pholis gunnellus) For most fi sh, the greatest mortality tial variation in species diver sity and were dominant in Penobscot Bay in occurs during early life stages (Hjort, abundance, and 3) to relate these vari- March and April. Larvae of spring to early summer spawners such as 1914; Cushing, 1975; Leggett and Deb- ations to differences in location and en- winter fl ounder (Pleuronectes america- lois, 1994). Therefore, it is essential that vironmental variables. nus) Atlantic seasnail (Liparis atlan- fi sh eggs and larvae develop in favorable ticus), and radiated shanny (Ulvaria habitats that maximize the probability subbifurcata) were more abundant in of survival. Bigelow (1926) recognized Materials and methods May and June. Penobscot Bay appears the signifi cance of the coastal shelf for to be a nursery for many fi shes; there- the production of fi sh larvae within the Field methods fore any degradation of water quality Gulf of Maine, noting that most larvae during the vernal period would have were found within the 200-m contour.
    [Show full text]