South East Queensland February 2021 Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bellthorpe National Park Management Statement 2013
Bellthorpe National Park Management Statement 2013 Legislative framework Park size: 7,550ha a Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 Bioregion: South Eastern Queensland a Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) QPWS region: Sunshine and Fraser Coast a Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth) Local government Moreton Bay Regional Council / a Nature Conservation Act 1992 estate/area: Somerset Regional Council / Sunshine Coast Regional Council Plans and agreements State electorate: Glass House/Nanango a Bonn Convention a China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement a Japan–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement a Republic of Korea–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement Thematic strategies a Level 2 Fire Management Strategy a Level 2 Pest Management Strategy Vision Bellthorpe National Park will continue to be a healthy, resilient mountain refuge for native plant and animal communities. Its natural integrity, with large areas unaffected by logging, contains a range of endangered and of concern communities, including significant examples of notophyll vine forests along upper catchment creek lines, and habitat for rare and threatened plants and birds. Maintenance of the aquatic ecosystems to protect threatened or endemic species including the giant barred frog, cascade tree frog, tusked frog, the giant spiny crayfish and the rainforest crayfish will be a priority. The park will provide a high quality water catchment and scenic backdrop to the rapidly developing Sunshine Coast hinterland, Caboolture and Kilcoy. Visitors can enjoy an accessible, regenerating natural area for nature-based recreation opportunities, including sustainable motorised recreation. Conservation purpose Bellthorpe National Park was gazetted in 2010. It was originally Bellthorpe State Forest prior to its transfer to Bellthorpe Forest Reserve 1 and 2 under the South East Queensland Forests Agreement (SEQFA) in 2003. -
A Dwarf Freshwater Crayfish from the Mary and Brisbane River Drainages, South-Eastern Queensland Robert B
Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 56 (2) © Queensland Museum 2013 PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Director. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qm.qld.gov.au A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum The distribution, ecology and conservation status of Euastacus urospinosus Riek, 1956 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae), a dwarf freshwater crayfish from the Mary and Brisbane River drainages, south-eastern Queensland Robert B. MCCORMACK Australian Aquatic Biological Pty Ltd, Karuah, NSW 2324. Email: [email protected] Paul VAN DER WERF Earthan Group Pty Ltd, Ipswich, Collinwood Park, Qld 4301 Citation: McCormack, R.B. & Van der Werf, P. 2013 06 30. The distribution, ecology and conservation status of Euastacus urospinosus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae), a dwarf freshwater crayfish from the Mary and Brisbane River drainages, south-eastern Queensland. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum — Nature 56(2): 639–646. Brisbane. ISSN 0079–8835. ABSTRACT The Maleny Crayfish Euastacus urospinosus has previously only been recorded from Boo - loumba and Obi Obi Creeks, Mary River, Queensland. -
The Block Magazine the Block Is Back in 2020
THE BLOCK MAGAZINE THE BLOCK IS BACK IN 2020 Season 16 of The Block maybe the biggest and most difficult series of The Block yet! The Blockheads will transform five existing homes that have been relocated from different eras dating from 1910 to 1950. The challenge for each team will be to modernise whilst maintaining a nod to heritage in their styles. We’ll capture it all in the 2020 edition of The Block magazine and on our dedicated The Block section of Homes to Love. THE BLOCK 2020 magazine will provide the final reveals, home by home and room by ON SALE, SPECS room featuring all the details. We’ll cover floor plans, before and after shots and budget recommendations, plus the ‘Little Block Book’ of products and suppliers including & RATES furniture, home-wares, prices, stockists, paint colour, lighting, flooring, tiles and surfaces, ON SALE: 16 Nov, 2020 joinery and fittings – everything you need to know to recreate 2020’s sensational BOOKING: 23 Oct, 2020 makeovers. MATERIAL: 27 Nov, 2020 THE BLOCK 2019 series was an outstanding success with the average episode attracting DIMENSIONS just under a million viewers and the finale being the highest rating episode for the season BOOK SIZE: 270x225mm with 1.9M+ Australians tuning in to see Tess & Luke take out the top spot. PRINT RUN: 40,000 Don’t miss out! Be part of Australia’s favourite home renovation show with THE BLOCK ADVERTISING RATES 2020 magazine, flying off the shelves in November 2020. – and HOMES TO LOVE, going DPS: $12,000 live in August 2020 (exact time tbc). -
Life History Notes on the Banded Grass-Skipper, Toxidia Parvulus (Plotz, 1884) Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae - Wesley Jenkinson
Life History Notes on the Banded Grass-skipper, Toxidia parvulus (Plotz, 1884) Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae - Wesley Jenkinson This hesperiid is one of many small species located throughout the eastern Australian states. Even though the species is quite common locally, any published detail regarding the life history appears to be lacking. In South East Queensland the species is generally more restricted in its habitat range than the common Dingy Grass- skipper (Toxidia peron) and usually avoids suburban gardens (unless suitable habitat exists nearby). It is locally common in the foothills and mountain slopes of the Great Divide, where it is chiefly established in a range of moist and dry eucalypt open forests where suitable host grasses are growing. The adults are slower and less robust in flight than T. peron, and usually remain closer to the ground than other species in the genus, unless searching for flowers. Both sexes are readily attracted to a wide variety of small native and introduced flowers. The average wingspan for the males is 23mm and 24mm for the females. Banded Grass-skipper (Toxidia parvulus) Ovipositing was observed during warm, sunny conditions around midday, during March 2008 in South East Queensland. Females fluttered slowly amongst the host grasses and settled on the stems, laying eggs singly on sheltered parts of the stem. They appeared to have a preference for the softer grass established in semi-shaded areas below large eucalypt trees. After an egg was laid, they flew several metres in search of another suitable location to lay the next egg. While ovipositing, the wings remain closed and the abdomen was curled onto the host plant. -
Chapter 3 Redevelopment of the Block
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Inquiry into issues relating to Redfern/Waterloo Chapter 3 Redevelopment of the Block The terms of reference for the Inquiry require the Committee to examine proposals for the future of the Block. The long-term future of the Block and its residents is a complex issue requiring initiatives to address social and economic disadvantage experienced by the local Aboriginal community. These issues will be examined in the second stage of the Inquiry and will be addressed in the Final Report. This chapter focuses on the future of the Block in terms of the redevelopment of housing. The purpose of the Committee’s examination of this issue is not to decide what the future of the Block is to be, as that must be determined by the Aboriginal Housing Company and the Aboriginal community. Rather, the Committee has sought to gather together the range of views expressed by members of the community and local organisations during this Inquiry, in order to explore the issues surrounding the Aboriginal Housing Company’s Pemulwuy Redevelopment Project and the progress of the redevelopment. This chapter commences with a brief history of the Block and the Aboriginal community in Redfern and Waterloo. History of the Block and the Aboriginal community in Redfern 3.1 ‘The Block’ is the colloquial name for a residential block in Redfern bounded by Louis, Vine, Eveleigh and Caroline Streets. The Block is owned by the Aboriginal Housing Company. A map of the local area is set out as Appendix 4. 3.2 Redfern and the Block in particular, is a place of political, spiritual and cultural significance for Aboriginal people in Sydney and also for Aboriginal people throughout New South Wales and Australia. -
ACT, Australian Capital Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Reporting Period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020)
Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science © State of Queensland, 2020. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. September 2020 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities ............................................................. 1 List of legislation and subordinate legislation .............................................................................................................. -
V I C T I M I Z I N G the Vulnerable
VICTI M I Z I N G THE VULNER A B L E The Demographics of Eminent Domain Abuse By Dick M. Carpenter II, Ph.D. & John K. Ross Institute for Justice June 2007 VICTIMIZING THE VULNERABLE The Demographics of Eminent Domain Abuse by Dick M. Carpenter II, Ph.D. John K. Ross Institute for Justice June 2007 Executive Summary n Kelo v. City of New London—one of the most reviled U.S. Supreme Court decisions in history—the Court upheld the use Iof eminent domain by governments to take someone’s private property and give it to another for private economic development. In a major expansion of eminent domain power, the now-infamous Kelo decision marked the first time the U.S. Supreme Court approved the use of eminent domain for purely private development under the Public Use Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which traditionally had been limited to taking property for unambiguous public uses, such as schools or courthouses. In their dissents, Justices Sandra Day O’Connor for example, by the neighborhood at the center of the and Clarence Thomas not only pilloried the five Kelo case—a working-class area different than those justices in the majority for this expansion of so-called typically envisioned as in need of “renewal.” “public use,” but also predicted dire consequences This research uses census data to test the as a result of the decision: Poor, minority and predictions of Justices O’Connor and Thomas. It other historically disenfranchised and comparably compares the demographic characteristics of 84 powerless communities would be disproportionately areas targeted by eminent domain for private hurt through eminent domain abuse. -
Domain-Independent, Automatic Partitioning for Probabilistic Planning
Domain-Independent, Automatic Partitioning for Probabilistic Planning Peng Dai Mausam Daniel S. Weld Dept of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA-98195 {daipeng,mausam,weld}@cs.washington.edu Abstract scan on two contiguous files from the disk. EMVI is a the- oretically clever algorithm, but was outperformed in practice Recent progress on external-memory MDP solvers, by PEMVI [Dai et al., 2008]. PEMVI divides the states into in particular PEMVI [Dai et al., 2008], has en- blocks and performs (one or more) backups on all states in abled optimal solutions to large probabilistic plan- a block before moving onto the next ones. All information ning problems. However, PEMVI requires a human required for backing blocks is stored on the disk and is trans- to manually partition the MDP before the planning ferred on demand in a piecemeal fashion. This simple idea algorithm can be applied — putting an added bur- was very effective in practice and significantly outperformed den on the domain designer and detracting from the EMVI, but, with one caveat – PEMVI required a human to vision of automated planning. This paper presents specify the partitioning of the state space. Human specified a novel partitioning scheme, which automatically partitioning is a far cry from the vision of automated plan- subdivides the state space into blocks that respect ning. the memory constraints. Our algorithm first ap- In this paper, we develop and implement automatic parti- plies static domain analysis to identify candidates tioning on top of PEMVI. We first build a theory of XOR for partitioning, and then uses heuristic search to groups [Edelkamp and Helmert, 1999] and construct neces- generate a ‘good’ partition. -
Lightbridge to the Block the Block 2016 Issue Vision 37 — the Block 2016
ISSUE LIGHTBRIDGE TO THE BLOCK THE BLOCK 2016 ISSUE VISION 37 — THE BLOCK 2016 4 Click to view VISION's interview with The Block's architect, Julian Brenchley LIGHTBRIDGE TO THE BLOCK Port Melbourne, VIC Television’s powerhouse ratings performer The Block, once again featured Viridian as a sponsorship partner for its 2016 season. Two products – LightBridgeTM and MirraEchoTM Bronze – played major roles in bringing to life contestants’ work. High on-camera and behind the scenes energy, virtuoso retrofitting and strong sales all marked The Block’s fortunes. Series architect Julian Brenchley is the talent with the Midas touch. VISION 37 — THE BLOCK 2016 4 Click to view VISION's interview with The Block's architect, Julian Brenchley LIGHTBRIDGE TO THE BLOCK Port Melbourne, VIC Television’s powerhouse ratings performer The Block, once again featured Viridian as a sponsorship partner for its 2016 season. Two products – LightBridgeTM and MirraEchoTM Bronze – played major roles in bringing to life contestants’ work. High on-camera and behind the scenes energy, virtuoso retrofitting and strong sales all marked The Block’s fortunes. Series architect Julian Brenchley is the talent with the Midas touch. VISION 37 — THE BLOCK 2016 LIGHTBRIDGE TO THE BLOCK The Block continues as a runaway success in television ratings land. Since its launch in 2002, the renovation series has etched a signature unmistakably its own. PROJECT hink adaptive reuse and intelligent recycling The Block, Port Melbourne Tand in large part you have the program’s ARCHITECT prosperity in the palm of your hand. Julian Brenchley PRINCIPAL GLAZING A sharp architectural eye from day one, has given Viridian LightBridgeTM Viridian MirraEchoTM Bronze the show a huge head start on competitors hoping TEXT, IMAGES & FILM to cash in on the makeover boom. -
The Rights Behind Eminent Domain Fights: a Little Property and a Lot of Home
The Rights behind Eminent Domain Fights: A Little Property and a Lot of Home By Debbie Becher. Forthcoming 2010 in Property Rights and Neo‐liberalism: Cultural Demands and Legal Actions. Editors Wayne McIntosh and Laura Hatcher. Ashgate Press.1 Abstract The Court opinion in Kelo v. City of New London (2005) drew national attention to property rights with what was once a local dispute over government’s use of eminent domain. How do we understand the widespread support for the libertarian agenda that emerged in this case’s aftermath? To answer this question, I present a Philadelphia version of the project behind Kelo and the backlash afterwards. As in Kelo, the condemnations along American Street in Philadelphia galvanized activism that built widespread resistance to government taking of property. The city targeted sixty-eight privately owned properties, of which forty-two were vacant lots and buildings, fourteen were occupied homes, and two were occupied businesses. I offer a history of how these plans to use eminent domain developed, how those plans proceeded, and how stakeholders and the public reacted to them. I find that anti-eminent domain activists converted narrow sympathy with their narrative about a particular event to mobilization around property rights more generally. Yet by conflating home with property while making demands on government, activists also subtly moved the meaning of property rights away from a libertarian agenda of downsized government. I interpret citizen mobilization against eminent domain on American Street as making three different kinds of demands for property and home rights, each moving further away from a neoliberal ideology. -
Bellthorpe Download
k %70 KENILWORTH " Mapleton Kenilworth State Forest Forest Reserve li Bli Road BLI BLI B " O b MAPLETON MOUNT " i Nam leto WALLI bo ap n Ro ad I2NAMBOUR Obi F u r M " S k R l a oa u d OBI OBI x n " t o s n h R i n d M1 e " MAROOCHYDORE B I2 ore Rd FLAXTON yd Maleny " L h ro o c M National A Ma ot Kondalilla orway Park National C %70 MOOLOOLABA "BUDERIM " DONOVANS Park K KNOB PALMWOODS " C k A I2 O " L N y MONTVILLE L N a Maleny - nshine Moto rw Ke Su O n %70 i l d w N a R o o Moolaolah River D r R t A National Park h I2 e A CONONDALE l R l i " N o L v a t G Bellthorpe E d MOUNT on M SIPPY E K Conondale - k y State Forest MALENY n R " e l Visitor Information Map a A M I2" y a N MOOLOOLAH Ca lo W oa ndsbo G R d La r un r o dra n u R oad i e Exit 188 l v gh - E i 4wd through BellthorpeMa National Park %60 k R le c n % i y 60 y N e l R n o q a t CROHAMHURST a " " d " y leny - S I2 a a LANDSBOROUGH W CALOUNDRA M in k Irw M1 BOOROOBIN e v y e t a chester Road S w Pe a h g %6 i BELLTHORPE H e " c u r PEACHESTER " BEERWAH B Bellthorp e I2 CEDARTON R ange k Bellthorpe Ro MOUNT ad k MOUNT MARYSMOKES State Forest MOUNT d COOCHIN a MCLEAN d COMMISSIONERS FLAT o %60 k a Glass House R o Mountains e R i p Beerburrum h MOUNT National NGUNGUN a m BEERWAH k k y w Park k State r STANMORE " I2 GLASS HOUSE e COONOWRIN G Forest e MOUNTAINS B d l - %6 Coral STONY O y CREEK o y c a Sea il k W V K k Kilcoy r High ila w n WILD HORSE gu ay Beerburrum k i k 'A TIBROGARGAN MOUNTAIN D State w r I Forest m Wood e u v rr fo M1 u r e d t rb Road m Ro d e e S ru a B VILLENEUVE