Urban Planning (ISSN: 2183–7635) 2019, Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 196–211 DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i3.2115 Article From Ideal Proposals to Serial Developments: Victor Bourgeois’s Schemes in the Light of Post-War Developments in Brussels Gérald Ledent Faculté d’Architecture, d’Ingénierie Architecturale, d’Urbanisme (LOCI), UCLouvain, 1060 Brussels, Belgium; E-Mail:
[email protected] Submitted: 31 March 2019 | Accepted: 24 June 2019 | Published: 30 September 2019 Abstract Three essential elements of modernism consolidated through war: a centralised welfare state, a serial industrial apparatus and, often, a territorial tabula rasa. Hence, for many modernist architects and urban planners, post-war Europe became the ideal ground to put their ideas to the test. However, there is a genuine discrepancy between the proposals of the first four Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne (CIAM) and what was massively implemented throughout Europe after 1945. To explore this divergence, Brussels proves to be an interesting case study for two main reasons. First, it hosted the third CIAM in November 1930, where Victor Bourgeois presented his views on housing and cities, in line with the ide- als of the time. Second, after the war, Belgium, like many Western countries, experienced a period of euphoria, during which the modernist ideology attained a sudden and broad consensus. In the capital over the following three decades new infrastructure was built, as well as housing developments that derived, at least formally, from the CIAM ideals. This article explores the gap between the ideals and the reality of modernism through a comparison on two scales: the city and housing.