INSIGHTS: KEN STARR on the MUELLER REPORT Ken Starr Interviewed by Jimmy Sengenberger
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Principled Ideas from the Centennial Institute Publisher, Dr. Donald W. Sweeting Volume 12, Number 3 • March 2020 Editor, Jeff Hunt • Assistant Editor, Antonette Smith INSIGHTS: KEN STARR ON THE MUELLER REPORT Ken Starr interviewed by Jimmy Sengenberger Ken Starr at the 2019 Western Conservative Summit. Jimmy Sengenberger JS: You wrote a wonderful book, It ended up with Paul Manafort being found guilty of crimes Contempt: a Memoir of the Clinton Investigation. One of the that had nothing to do with the initial investigation. things that is fascinating about this book is the detail about how KS: He was found guilty on seven indictments. you got from a land deal to a blue dress. How in the world did JS: Yes, but it was unrelated to the Russia investigation. It was that happen? looking back years ago with regards to Ukraine and not related Ken Starr KS: One of the reasons I chose to write the book after to Russian collusion. What do you make of that? 20 years was that there continued to be a lack of understanding KS: This is one of the reasons Bob Mueller's testimony will be as to how the investigation progressed to the most controversial important to answer some of these questions. My understanding phase, the Lewinsky phase. We had fourteen criminal convictions is that the Manafort investigation and prosecution was in Arkansas, but what does that have to do with conduct in the authorized by the acting Attorney General the United States. White House involving this relationship? Whatever one wants to say about Bob Mueller, the investigation, Information came to us that the president of the United States and the report, I have no reason to believe that each of those was involved in a perjurious course of action encouraging others prosecutions, including General Michael Flynn, were not to lie under oath. We assemble that information, took it to the authorized specifically by the Deputy Attorney General. Attorney General of the United States, Janet Reno, who was JS: Let's get to the Mueller report. You have been going after a appointed by President Clinton, and she made the determination, former colleague of yours, Bob Mueller, the special counsel on correctly I believe, that the matter had to be investigated. She did this case, particularly for the way in which he handled book 2, not sweep it under the rug. She did the right thing and went to which is about accusations of obstruction of justice on the part a three-judge panel, which existed under the old Independent of President Trump. Why have you been so critical of him? Counsel law. That three-judge panel ratified what the Attorney General has said, that our investigation should look into these Ken Starr was the independent counsel on the investigation that led to the serious allegations of perjury and obstruction of justice. That got impeachment of Pres. Bill Clinton. He is now a member of Pres. Trump’s lost in all of the debate twenty-one years ago. defense team for his impeachment trial in the Senate. Centennial Institute sponsors research, events, and publications to enhance JS: That goes to a cornerstone question about the Russia public understanding of the most important issues facing our state and nation. investigation. That investigation began supposedly looking By proclaiming Truth, we aim to foster faith, family, and freedom, into Trump/Russia collusion and interference in our elections. teach citizenship, and renew the spirit of 1776. C E N T E N N I A L I N S T I T U T E Faith Family Freedom Future Dear Reader, Reading this interview can feel a bit dated. It’s amazing the Mueller Report happened only eight months ago. Judge Ken Starr just recently visited Colorado Christian University and addressed our faculty on the importance of Christian higher education. We were so grateful to host him once again. He has been a defender of law and justice through many of the most contentious moments in recent American history. During his most recent successful defense of President Trump at the Senate impeachment trials, Starr alluded to the “Age of Impeachment.” Special councils became a tool of the House of Representatives originally under the Independent Council Provisions of the Ethics and Government Act of 1978. When this law was challenged in court via the case Morrison v. Olson, Justice Scalia condemned the independent counsels law as a violation of the separation of powers. He famously wrote in dissent, “Frequently, an issue of this sort will come before the Court clad, so to speak, in sheep’s clothing: the potential of the asserted principle to effect important change in the equilibrium of power is not immediately evident, and must be discerned by a careful and perceptive analysis. But this wolf comes as a wolf.” The Independent Council Provision of the Ethics and Government Act of was allowed to expire in June of 1999 but the precedent of appointing independent councils still remains within internal Department of Justice regulations. One of the key aspects of Judge Starr’s defense of President Trump during the Senate Impeachment Trial was that we experiencing these impeachment attempts because of a weakening of the separation of powers between the three branches. Similar to Justice Scalia’s arguments, Judge Starr argued that we must return to equal and separate powers of the three branches of our government. Unlike many universities in America, Colorado Christian University is committed to impacting culture in support of the original intent of the Constitution. Because of your support, we are bringing guests like Judge Ken Starr to our university to help train the next generation to embrace our country’s founding documents. Thank you for your continued support! Jeff Hunt Director, Centennial Institute Co-Chairman, Western Conservative Summit Vice President of Public Policy, Colorado Christian University The Centennial Review speech digest is published monthly by the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University. CCU seeks to provide Christ-centered higher education transforming students to impact the world with grace and truth. The authors’ views are not necessarily those of CCU or the Centennial Institute. Subscriptions free upon request. Write to: Centennial Institute, 8787 W. Alameda Ave., Lakewood, CO 80226. Call 303-963-3157 or visit us online at centennial.ccu.edu. 8787 W Alameda Ave Lakewood, CO 80226 [email protected] 303.963.3424 centennial.ccu.edu Centennial Review ▪ March 2020 ▪ 2 KS: I have a background of a professional relationship with Robert Mueller. Bob and I served under President George Herbert Walker Bush, President Bush 41. Bob served with great distinction as head of the Criminal Division at that time. He has had a distinguished career. But here we are now. I have been critical of the Mueller Report because I believe it goes far beyond what is contemplated by the regulations of the Justice Department. Briefly, those regulations call on Special Counsel Bob Mueller to provide the Attorney General, not Congress, with a confidential report. Note the word confidential. The report should explain his prosecutorial and declination decisions. He did that in book one, but he then goes on in book two, which is the obstructive acts. What that part of the report was designed to be was inappropriate. It essentially is a book for Congress to consider impeachment. As an agent and subordinate officer of the Justice Department, he did not have that authority. That said, it is before the Congress, and we will see what he says in his testimony. JS: When you released the Starr Report, you were clear in testifying before Congress that you believed the President Clinton had committed obstruction of justice in addition to perjury. Do you think the Mueller Report provides sufficient evidence that President Trump actually committed obstruction of justice? KS: I don't. I know there There are reasons are prosecutors who believe there is evidence, but I disagree. First, why we must be JS: Bob Mueller was supposed to testify next Wednesday. It's I have a quarrel with been postponed to the 24th. Do you think he will actually concerned and the approach that the testify? report takes with respect vigilant. But the to the obstruction of KS: I will be surprised if he does not because he was under Supreme Court justice statute. Second, subpoena. The subpoena said, we intend to have your testimony many of the acts that Mr. Mueller, we being the House Judiciary Committee. The fact has been favoring are referred to, such that it was supported by House Republicans tells you that there as the firing of James is a compelling interest in hearing what he has to say. religious liberty. Comey, are at the heart JS: Providing that does happen, put us in Bob Mueller shoes. of presidential power. You are one of very few people in the history of the country who President Trump was exercising his Article II power. When I can talk about a situation like that of a Special Counsel testifying look at each of the obstructive acts as they are called, they are not before Congress on a report about a president the United States. chargeable offenses. KS: What I think he should and will do is stick with a report. Therefore, I applaud Bill Barr. He has come under serious When the questions flow from both sides of the aisle, he needs to criticism for having made the decision. Also, and this went know his report absolutely and then not embellish. In particular, underreported, Rod Rosenstein the Deputy Attorney General he needs to be assiduous in avoiding the question, “do you who appointed Bob Mueller, agreed with the decision consistent think the President of the United States should be impeached with the traditions of the department.