The Honorable Joe Biden Presidential Transition Office 1401 Constitution Ave NW November 9, 2020 Dear President-Elect Biden: On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Honorable Joe Biden Presidential Transition Office 1401 Constitution Ave NW November 9, 2020 Dear President-Elect Biden: On The Honorable Joe Biden Presidential Transition Office 1401 Constitution Ave NW Washington, DC 20230 November 9, 2020 Dear President-Elect Biden: On behalf of more than 4,000 charitable organizations from all 50 states, we share the Nonprofit Community Letter highlighting the urgent federal legislative priorities of organizations serving on the frontlines dealing with the coronavirus pandemic in every community in America. We encourage you to address both the vital services provided by nonprofits and the need for targeted relief as soon as possible The nonprofit sector is the backbone of many of our communities. Before the pandemic, nonprofits collectively employed over 12.3 million Americans --- more than were employed in the construction, financial services, or manufacturing sector. Nonprofit health and human services providers are on the front lines, directly serving people impacted by COVID-19 or actively working to prevent further transmission. Cultural institutions are providing online educational programs for children, teachers, and families. You have seen the work of many other charitable organizations, helping with food and housing insecurity as job losses and evictions mount. Demand for these services has skyrocketed as donations have plummeted or failed to keep pace, and nonprofits have reason to fear additional cuts on their grants and contracts with government agencies at all levels. As other industries forecast the layoff of thousands in the weeks leading up to the election, charitable nonprofits have already lost nearly 1 million jobs due to the economic impact of COVID-19. More nonprofit job losses are on the way as the funds from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans run out, unemployment bills come due, emergency federal funding streams have not been replenished, and charitable giving continues to decline. Larger nonprofits, completely shut out of the job-saving programs contained in the CARES Act, are similarly running out of time and money. The attached letter provides details on specific relief pertaining to unemployment reimbursement, Paycheck Protection Program expansion, support for midsize organizations, and charitable giving expansion. Those solutions, which will save thousands of jobs, are readily available and have strong bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. We ask that you embrace these policy solutions to provide the urgently needed relief and recovery for the nonprofit sector nationwide. We look forward to continuing this discussion with you. Laura Walling from Goodwill Industries International, Inc. ([email protected]) can serve as a point of contact for you. Sincerely, Alliance for Strong Families and Communities American Alliance of Museums American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network American Heart Association American Lung Association Americans for the Arts Association of Art Museum Directors Boys & Girls Clubs of America Catholic Charities USA Communities in Schools Council for Advancement and Support of Education Council on Foundations Covenant House International Dance/USA Epilepsy Foundation ETS Faith & Giving Coalition Futures Without Violence Girl Scouts of the USA Girls Inc. Goodwill Industries International Habitat for Humanity International Independent Sector Jewish Federation of North America Leadership 18 League of American Orchestras Lutheran Services in America March of Dimes Meals on Wheels America Mental Health America National Council of Nonprofits OPERA America The Arc of the United States The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society The Nonprofit Alliance United Philanthropy Forum United Way Worldwide Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America Volunteers of America YMCA of the USA YWCA USA Urgent Nonprofit Policy Priorities in Reforms to CARES Act July 13, 2020 Updated November 9, 2020 Urgent Nonprofit Policy Priorities in Reforms to CARES Act July 13, 2020 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Mitch McConnell Speaker Majority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Kevin McCarthy The Honorable Chuck Schumer Minority Leader Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Leader McConnell, Leader McCarthy, and Leader Schumer: The charitable nonprofit community appreciates that several key relief programs in the various COVID-19 relief laws enacted by Congress extend eligibility to some nonprofit organizations. These bipartisan efforts recognize both that the American people rely extensively on charitable nonprofits for important services and supports and that charitable nonprofits play a significant role in our nation’s economy as the third largest employer. These programs have been a lifeline for many nonprofits during this difficult time and it is clear that every dollar granted, donated, or earned has been leveraged immediately to address clear and present challenges. However, nonprofits – like the people we serve throughout the country – still face significant challenges. As we continue to provide relief and begin the process of reopening, these challenges will only grow. As you work on the next COVID-19 relief package this month, the charitable nonprofit sector urges you to address four specific issues to ensure we can continue to provide frontline services to those in need, and are able to help our communities recover. The following key areas have garnered widespread bipartisan support in both the House and Senate and will be covered in depth at virtual briefings during the #Relief4Charities “week of action” beginning July 13: 1. Continue Emergency Funding Programs that provide nonprofits with financial support enabling them to continue and expand services protecting vulnerable families and frontline responders. Charitable organizations must have additional resources to provide vital services essential to individual and community wellbeing, both during the pandemic and to support recovery and rebuilding efforts. Our requests: (1) Extend and expand the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) by enabling a second round of funding for all nonprofits and modifying the eligibility criteria pertaining to 500 employees; (2) Enact and expand grant and funding programs, such as the proposed WORK NOW Act or the Employee Retention Tax Credit, to help nonprofits retain employees, scale service delivery, and create new jobs; and (3) Appropriate funds for federal grant programs that enable nonprofits to advance their missions of serving communities. 2. Provide Low-Cost Loans to Mid-Size and Larger Nonprofits which have not been able to access government funding. Nonprofits with 500 or more employees are currently completely shut out of the two most important sources of COVID-19 financial support: the PPP and the Federal Reserve Main Street Lending Program (“MSLP”). The recently proposed “nonprofit” MSLP contains numerous financial restrictions and lacks the forgivable feature of PPP that make it unattractive to most organizations that are targeted for the support. Our requests: (1) Authorize and require the Federal Reserve to quickly finalize a nonprofit lending facility under MSLP that is tailored to accommodate mid-size nonprofits including language similar to H.R. 6800 Updated November 9, 2020 Nonprofit Community Letter Page 2 of 37 that offers a loan forgiveness option; and (2) Extend eligibility of PPP to all nonprofits of all sizes similar to H.R. 6800 and lift the loan cap to appropriately reflect the operational needs of these nonprofits. 3. Strengthen Charitable Giving Incentives to encourage all Americans to help their communities during these challenging times through charitable donations. Donations are especially needed today as nonprofits respond to the current health and economic crisis and will be critical in the future as nonprofits play an essential role in recovery efforts when the pandemic ends. Our requests: (1) Expand the above-the-line or universal charitable deduction in the CARES Act by enacting the provisions in S. 4032/H.R. 7324 increasing the amount to one-third of the standard deduction; and (2) Extend this and the giving incentives enacted in the CARES Act through 2021. 4. Provide Full Unemployment Benefit Reimbursement to nonprofits that self-insure these benefits. Federal and state laws give nonprofits the option of operating as self-insured (“reimbursing”) employers that make payments to their state unemployment insurance systems for benefits attributable to them in lieu of advance contributions. Shut-down orders by government officials and program cancellations have forced nonprofits to furlough or layoff staff, triggering immediate, catastrophic unemployment payment bills that are due this month in most states. Compounding the problem has been a Labor Department ruling that requires nonprofits to pay 100% of unemployment costs upfront. These challenges are exacerbating cash flow difficulties at a time when other employers will likely experience little or no additional costs resulting from COVID-19-related layoffs and are diverting valuable funds from mission services. Our request: Increase the federal unemployment insurance reimbursement for self-insured (reimbursing) nonprofits to 100% of costs. We thank you, once again, for your leadership in crafting and passing COVID-19 related relief legislation. We hope that nonprofits can count on your continued leadership, and your insistence that the needs of nonprofits, and the indispensable role they play, are at the center of upcoming relief
Recommended publications
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Next for the United States?
    February 2021 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Office USA, Washington, D.C. What's next for the United States? Part 2: Climate Change and Energy Supply By Sabine Murphy How is the Biden administration changing the direction of the U.S.? The KAS Office USA takes a first look, in a series of five country reports. This report deals with climate and energy challenges. The White House website promises “swift action to tackle the climate emergency” and a “clean energy revolution”. Key Policy Goals The Biden-Harris administration doesn’t make it a secret that the fight against climate change is on top of the to-do-list. Climate is prominently listed on the White House website as one of seven top policy priorities. It states: “President Biden will take swift action to tackle the climate emergency. The Biden administration will ensure we meet the demands of science, while empowering American workers and businesses to lead a clean energy revolution.”1 The Biden administration takes a decidedly different approach to energy use and the impact of rising temperatures on the environment than its predecessor. After four years of the Trump administration denying scientific findings about climate change, Biden has pledged to follow science and involve the entire federal government in the fight against climate change. By creating inter-agency working groups and a National Climate Task Force, Biden wants to ensure that his policies for the production of clean energy and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, are not limited to single agencies but will be implemented throughout the federal government. During his campaign, Biden promised to reach a goal of net-zero emissions across the economy before 2050, and to eliminate pollution caused by fossil fuel in electricity production by 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley IGS Poll
    UC Berkeley IGS Poll Title Release #2021-09: Californians’ Early Assessments of the Performance of President Biden and Vice President Harris are Highly Positive Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4088n2j0 Author Di Camillo, Mark Publication Date 2021-05-12 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Institute of Governmental Studies 126 Moses Hall University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 Tel: 510-642-6835 Email: [email protected] Release #2021-09 Wednesday, May 12, 2021 Californians’ Early Assessments of the Performance of President Biden and Vice President Harris are Highly Positive. by Mark DiCamillo, Director, Berkeley IGS Poll (c) 415-602-5594 Californians generally offer highly positive assessments of the job performances of Joe Biden as President and Kamala Harris as the nation’s Vice President. In its examinations of how voters here view the nation’s new political leaders, the Berkeley IGS Poll finds 62% approving of the job Biden is doing as President, while just 34% disapprove. Vice President Harris also is rated favorably, with 53% approving and 33% disapproving. In addition, most of the voters who approve of Biden’s and Harris’s performance do so strongly. Biden’s initial ratings place him in the mid-range of the job marks given by California voters to other recent presidents at the beginning of their first year in office. All told, four of Biden’s nine immediate predecessors – Barack Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, and John F. Kennedy – received higher initial job performance scores than Biden, while four others – Donald Trump, George W. Bush, Gerald Ford, and Bill Clinton – were given lower marks.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden's 100 Days
    BIDEN’S 100 DAYS 1 Biden's 100 Days Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University April 29, 2021 The views expressed in the Carr Center Discussion Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. Cover photograph by Gage Skidmore. Copyright 2021, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America 2 A LOOK AT BIDEN’S FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE We asked faculty and fellows at the Carr Center to share their insight on the Biden Administration’s first 100 days in office. Here’s what they had to say. JACQUELINE BHABHA Immigrants’ rights advocates can celebrate a glass half full 100 days after Biden’s inauguration. The new administration has quickly reversed some of the most Professor of the Practice of egregious measures instituted by its predecessor. Over 1,000 asylum applicants Health & Human Rights, HSPH; who have been forced to wait in Mexico for their hearings have now been allowed Jeremiah Smith Jr. Lecturer into the US; local governments engaged in shielding undocumented migrants in Law, HLS from deportation no longer risk the loss of their federal funding; construction of the infamous border wall has been halted; and a bill to restore pathways to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Harry Truman' by David Blanchflower
    Harry Truman 12 April 1945 – 20 January 1953 Democrat By David Blanchflower Full name: Harry S Truman Date of birth: 8 May 1884 Place of birth: Lamar, Missouri Date of death: 26 December 1972 Site of grave: Harry S Truman Presidential Library & Museum, Independence, Missouri Education: Spalding’s Commercial College, Kansas City Married to: Bess Wallace. m. 1919. (1885-1982) Children: 1 d. Margaret "You know, it's easy for the Monday morning quarterback to say what the coach should have done, after the game is over. But when the decision is up before you - - and on my desk I have a motto which says The Buck Stops Here" Harry Truman, National War College, December 19th, 1952 'Give 'em hell' Harry S. Truman was the 33rd president of the United States and also the 33rd tallest. He was born on May 8th, 1884 and died at age 88 on December 22nd, 1972. Of note also is that V- E Day occurred on Truman's birthday on May 8th, 1945. He had no middle name. His parents gave him the middle initial, 'S', to honor his grandfathers, Anderson Shipp Truman and Solomon Young. He married his wife Elizabeth 'Bess' Wallace on June 28, 1919; he had previously proposed in 1911 and she turned him down; but they finally got engaged in 1913. She had been in his class at school when he was six and she was five, and she sat in the desk immediately behind him. The couple had one child, Mary Margaret Truman. Harry was a little man who did a lot, standing just 5 feet 9 inches tall which is short for a president.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Conference (Re)Presenting American Muslims: Broadening the Conversation Conference Team
    Harvard Conference (Re)Presenting American Muslims: Broadening the Conversation Conference Team Host and Co-Convener Co-Convener Alwaleed Islamic Studies Program Institute for Social Policy and at Harvard University: Understanding (ISPU): Dr. Ali Asani Kathryn M. Coughlin Farhan Latif Zeba Iqbal Professor of Indo- Executive Director, Prince Chief Operating Officer ISPU Research Team Muslim and Islamic Alwaleed bin Talal Islamic & Director of Policy Editor and Report Religion and Cultures; Studies Program Impact Author Director, Alwaleed Islamic Studies Program Co-Organizers Facilitators Maria Ebrahimji Hussein Rashid, PhD Nadia Firozvi Asim Rehman Journalist, Consultant, Founder, Islamicate, L3C Attorney in Former President, & Co-Founder, I Speak Washington, DC Muslim Bar Association For Myself Inc. of NY ISPU would like to acknowledge the generous supporters whose contributions made this report possible: Mohamed Elnabtity and Rania Zagho, Jamal Ghani, Mahmoud and Nada Hadidi, Mahmood and Annette Hai, Fasahat Hamzavi and Saba Maroof, Rashid Haq, Raghib Hussain, Mohammed Maaieh and Raniah Jaouni, Khawaja Nimr and Beenish Ikram, Ghulam Qadir and Huda Zenati, Nadia Roumani, Quaid Saifee and Azra Hakimi, Abubakar and Mahwish Sheikh, Haanei Shwehdi and Ilaaf Darrat, Ferras Zeni and Serene Katranji Participants (listed alphabetically) Zain Abdullah, PhD, Shakila Ahmad, Debbie Almontaser Sana Amanat, Shahed Amanullah Saud Anwar, Associate Professor President, Islamic President, Board of Editor, Marvel Founder, Multiple Mayor of Windsor, in the
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition to Packing the United States Supreme Court Chairman
    Opposition to Packing the United States Supreme Court Chairman Hillyer, Vice Chair Grendell, Ranking Member Galonski and honorable members of the House Civil Justice Committee, I thank you for the opportunity to give testimony today on House Resolution 57, to urge the protection of the integrity and independence of the United States Supreme Court. “It was a bonehead idea. It was a terrible, terrible mistake to make. And it put in question, for an entire decade, the independence of the most significant body… in this country, the Supreme Court of the United States of America.” In 1983, then-Senator Joe Biden used these words to describe Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “court packing” plan. Roosevelt endeavored to appoint up to six new justices to the Supreme Court. The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, when asked about court packing in 2019, described it as “a bad idea when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to pack the court…Nine seems to be a good number, and it’s been that way for a long time.” Ginsburg explained that this process would politicize the high court and erode its independence, stating that "If anything would make the court appear partisan it would be that. One side saying when we’re in power we’re going to enlarge the number of judges so we’ll have more people who will vote the way we want them to. So I am not at all in favor of that solution.” As a brief historical background, the number of Supreme Court justices, which can be altered by legislation, has varied from six to ten at various points during the 18th and 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Faces on the Wall We Have All Seen Photos of “Dad” Land's Office, and S
    Centennial Celebration Moments # 48 (May 31, 2019) Faces on the Wall We have all seen photos of “Dad” Land’s office, and some of us have been privileged to visit the recreated office that originally came from the doctor’s home on Armour Boulevard, and rebuilt into the new office building at that same location, and ultimately moved to the Service and Leadership Center where it is now located. At one time, two walls were covered with photos—36 pictures to the right of “Dad” Land’s desk, and 24 pictures to the left. At the Service and Leadership Center, the fourth wall was not installed, to leave it open for display. What can be visited now is smaller than the original office, and only 27 of the silver-framed photos are on the wall now. In 1980, C. C. “Buddy” Faulkner, from Indiana, then Grand Master of the Order of DeMolay, took the time to provide Staff Member Tom Labagh, then Director of Membership and Public Relations, with personal notes describing each of the people he could identify from their photos. Faulkner had worked at the International Supreme Council, for “Dad” Land, and he had personal knowledge of “Dad” Land’s friendship with a number of these men. None of the photos are labeled—they just have signatures and personal messages to “Dad” Land written on them. Here is a list made when all the photos were on the wall. There is no significance to the order listed here… it doesn’t relate to prominence or to position on the wall, then, or now.
    [Show full text]
  • There Are Signs That As President, Joe Biden Could Adopt a Proactive Human Rights Approach Similar to Jimmy Page 1 of 3 Carter’S
    USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog: There are signs that as president, Joe Biden could adopt a proactive human rights approach similar to Jimmy Page 1 of 3 Carter’s There are signs that as president, Joe Biden could adopt a proactive human rights approach similar to Jimmy Carter’s During the 2018-2019 academic year, Joss Harrison was an undergraduate research assistant with the US Centre. As part of his work, he investigated the human rights-orientated foreign policy of the Jimmy Carter administration. Building on this work, he writes that the foreign policy rhetoric of the Democratic presidential nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden, has shown some close parallels with the human rights policies of the Carter administration. In recent months, Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, has begun to lay out his foreign policy vision. In a New York Times interview, he declared, “When I am president, human rights will be at the core of US foreign policy.” There are some promising parallels between the ideas Biden has set out and the policies pursued by the 1976-80 Democratic administration of Jimmy Carter. This is a welcome development, for no president since Carter has centred their foreign policy strategy on human rights in quite the same way. Carter’s commitment to promoting human rights In his inaugural address in January 1977 Carter set out a new approach to American foreign policy-making, breaking with years of Cold War orthodoxy to state that “Our commitment to human rights must be absolute”. This made for a stark contrast with the previous eight years of Nixon-Kissinger-Ford-style diplomacy, which bore an undisguised contempt for the notion that anything beyond the ‘national interest’, least of all human rights, should guide the US’ interactions with other states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prez Quiz Answers
    PREZ TRIVIAL QUIZ AND ANSWERS Below is a Presidential Trivia Quiz and Answers. GRADING CRITERIA: 33 questions, 3 points each, and 1 free point. If the answer is a list which has L elements and you get x correct, you get x=L points. If any are wrong you get 0 points. You can take the quiz one of three ways. 1) Take it WITHOUT using the web and see how many you can get right. Take 3 hours. 2) Take it and use the web and try to do it fast. Stop when you want, but your score will be determined as follows: If R is the number of points and T 180R is the number of minutes then your score is T + 1: If you get all 33 right in 60 minutes then you get a 100. You could get more than 100 if you do it faster. 3) The answer key has more information and is interesting. Do not bother to take the quiz and just read the answer key when I post it. Much of this material is from the books Hail to the chiefs: Political mis- chief, Morals, and Malarky from George W to George W by Barbara Holland and Bland Ambition: From Adams to Quayle- the Cranks, Criminals, Tax Cheats, and Golfers who made it to Vice President by Steve Tally. I also use Wikipedia. There is a table at the end of this document that has lots of information about presidents. THE QUIZ BEGINS! 1. How many people have been president without having ever held prior elected office? Name each one and, if they had former experience in government, what it was.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggling Against Stereotypes
    Islam Struggling Against Stereotypes Struggling Against Stereotypes Summary: The American media, including television programs, films, and newspapers, propagated negative portrayals of Islam and presented anti-Muslim rhetoric uncritically even before 9/11, though the issue intensified after the U.S. declared its “Global War on Terror.” Muslim individuals—and non-Muslims mistaken for Muslims—experience discrimination, harassment, and physical attacks, while mosques and Islamic centers are often vandalized. In the wake of hate attacks, Muslim organizations like the Islamic Circle of North America, the Council of American-Islamic Relations, the American Muslim Council, various mosque and Muslim media often utilize different outlets (open houses, pamphlets, call centers, TV series) to address stereotypes. One of the most widely discussed issues in the U.S. Muslim community is the negative image of Islam in the American media, an issue that was cause for concern even before 9/11. While appeals to the media for accuracy and fairness continue, newspaper headlines regularly print the words “Islam” and “Muslim” next to words like “fanatic,” “fundamentalist,” “militant,” “terrorist,” and “violence.” Uses of the term “jihad” in television programs and films are also illustrative. As a pamphlet for the media published by the American Muslim Council explains, the word jihad “is more accurately translated as ‘exertion of effort,’ not ‘holy war.’ The Prophet Muhammad said that the highest form of jihad is the personal struggle to make oneself a better Muslim.” Events such as the Iranian revolution of 1979 and the subsequent hostage crisis, the Gulf War, and, most significantly, 9/11 and the “Global War on Terror” that followed, have received enormous press coverage as evidence of “Islamic fundamentalism.” American Muslims often ask why a small group of extremists, whose terrorist actions violate the central principles of Islam, should determine the public image of the entire Muslim community.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama and Joe Biden on Defense Issues
    BARACK OBAMA AND JOE BIDEN ON DEFENSE ISSUES Before the 2000 election, George Bush and Dick Cheney famously told our military “Help is on the way.” Today, the active Army is short 3,000 captains and majors, and 58 percent of recent West Point graduates are choosing to leave the force – double the historic average. We do not have a single combat brigade at home in reserve, ready for an unexpected crisis. Our National Guard and Reserves have only half the equipment levels they need, hampering their ability to respond to crises, foreign and domestic. Ending the war in Iraq will be the beginning, but not the end, of addressing our defense challenges. Terrorist networks with a global reach and aspirations to weapons of mass destruction threaten our security. Failing states half a world away can provide safe harbor for terrorists and destabilize entire regions. Extreme regimes, like Iran and North Korea, threaten their neighbors, proliferate nuclear technology, and support terrorists while rising powers like China hold the potential to be either partners or adversaries. And most importantly, nations around the globe are reluctant to join with America in taking on mutual threats because they question our own commitment to democracy, justice, peace, and opportunity. The defense policies detailed here represent one aspect of Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s comprehensive, rigorous approach to advancing American national security and foreign policy. Their initiatives on diplomacy and development (detailed in separate fact sheet available on barackobama.com) combined with his defense policies will create a stronger America and a safer world.
    [Show full text]