Filgotinib for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Filgotinib for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis “ in collaboration with: Filgotinib for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis Produced by Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd. in collaboration with Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) and Maastricht University Authors Rob Riemsma, Reviews Manager, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, UK Sabine Grimm, Health Economist, Maastricht UMC, the Netherlands Ben Wijnen, Health Economist, Maastricht UMC Debra Fayter, Systematic Reviewer, KSR Ltd Sue O’Meara, Systematic Reviewer, KSR Ltd Nigel Armstrong, Health Economist, KSR Ltd Charlotte Ahmadu, Health Economist, KSR Ltd Lloyd Brandts, Health Economist, Maastricht UMC Gill Worthy, Statistician, KSR Ltd Kate Misso, Information Specialist, KSR Ltd John Kirwan, Emeritus Professor of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Bristol Manuela Joore, Health Economist, Maastricht UMC Jos Kleijnen, Director, KSR Ltd, Professor of Systematic Reviews in Health Care, Maastricht University Correspondence to Rob Riemsma, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Unit 6, Escrick Business Park Riccall Road, Escrick York, UK YO19 6FD Date completed 28/07/2020 Copyright 2021 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL PUBLISHED Source of funding: This report was commissioned by the NIHR Systematic Reviews Programme as project number STA 13/14/25. Declared competing interests of the authors None. Acknowledgements None. Commercial in confidence (CiC) data are highlighted in blue throughout the report. Academic in confidence (AiC) data are highlighted in yellow throughout the report. Copyright belongs to Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd. Rider on responsibility for report The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR Systematic Reviews Programme. Any errors are the responsibility of the authors. This report should be referenced as follows: Riemsma R, Grimm S, Wijnen B, Fayter D, O’Meara S, Armstrong N, Ahmadu C, Brandts L, Worthy G, Misso K, Kirwan J, Joore MA, Kleijnen J. Filgotinib for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a Single Technology Assessment. York: Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 2020. Contributions of authors Rob Riemsma acted as project lead and systematic reviewer on this assessment, critiqued the clinical effectiveness methods and evidence and contributed to the writing of the report. Sabine Grimm acted as health economic project lead, critiqued the company’s economic evaluation and contributed to the writing of the report. Ben Wijnen, Lloyd Brandts, Charlotte Ahmadu and Nigel Armstrong acted as health economists on this assessment, critiqued the company’s economic evaluation and contributed to the writing of the report. Debra Fayter and Sue O’Meara acted as systematic reviewers, critiqued the clinical effectiveness methods and evidence and contributed to the writing of the report. Gill Worthy acted as statistician, critiqued the analyses in the company’s submission and contributed to the writing of the report. Kate Misso critiqued the search methods in the submission and contributed to the writing of the report. John Kirwan provided clinical expert advice and contributed to the writing of the report. Manuela Joore acted as health economist on this assessment, critiqued the company’s economic evaluation, contributed to the writing of the report and provided general guidance. Jos Kleijnen critiqued the company’s definition of the decision problem and their description of the underlying health problem and current service provision, contributed to the writing of the report and supervised the project. 2 Copyright 2021 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL PUBLISHED Abbreviations ABA Abatacept ACPA Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies ACR American College of Rheumatology ADA Adalimumab AE Adverse events AIC Akaike Information Criterion AIMS Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales ATP Adenosine triphosphate BAR Baricitinib bDMARD Biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs BSC Best supportive care BI Budget impact BIC Bayesian information criterion CCP Cyclic citrullinated peptide CDAI Clinical disease activity index cDMARDs Conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs CE Cost effectiveness CEA Cost effectiveness analysis CEAC Cost effectiveness acceptability curve CHMP Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use CI Confidence interval CRD Centre for Reviews and Dissemination CS Company’s submission CSA Clinically suspect arthralgia csDMARDs Conventional synthetic DMARDs (same as cDMARD) CSR Clinical study report CVD Cardiovascular disease CZP Certolizumab pegol DALY Disability-adjusted life years DAS Disease activity score DMARD Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs DSU Decision Support Unit EMA European Medicines Agency EMEA Europe, Middle East and Africa EPAR European Public Assessment Report EQ-5D European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions ERAN Early rheumatoid arthritis network ERG Evidence Review Group ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate ET Early termination ETA Etanercept EULAR European League Against Rheumatism EUR Erasmus University Rotterdam FACIT-F Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy FAD Final appraisal document FDA Food and Drug Administration GOL Golimumab HAQ Health assessment questionnaire HAQ-DI Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index HR Hazard ratio HRQoL Health-related quality of life HTA Health technology assessment IC Indirect comparison 3 Copyright 2021 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL PUBLISHED ICER Incremental cost effectiveness ratio IC50 Half maximal inhibitory concentration IFX Infliximab IR Inadequate response ITC Indirect treatment comparison ITT Intention to treat JAK Janus kinase KSR Kleijnen Systematic Reviews LYs Life years LYG Life years gained MACE Major adverse cardiovascular events MCS Mental component of the SF-36 survey MeSH Medical subject headings MHRA Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency MTX Methotrexate MTA Multiple technology appraisal NA Not applicable NHS National Health Service NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NIHR National Institute for Health Research NMA Network meta-analysis NR Not reported OS Overall survival PAS Patient access scheme PCS Physical component of the SF-36 survey PDUS Power Doppler ultrasound PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies PRISMA Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses PSA Probabilistic sensitivity analysis PSS Personal Social Services QALY Quality-adjusted life year QoL Quality of life RA Rheumatoid arthritis RCT Randomised controlled trial RF Rheumatoid factor RR Relative risk; risk ratio RTX Rituximab SAE Serious adverse events ScHARR School of Health and Related Research SD Standard deviation SDAI Simplified disease activity index SE Standard error SF-36 36-item Short Form Survey SLR Systematic literature review SMC Scottish Medicines Consortium SmPC Summary of product characteristics STA Single technology appraisal STATs Signal transducers and activators of transcription TA Technology appraisal TEAE Treatment emergent adverse events TNF Tumor Necrosis Factor TOC Tocilizumab TOF Tofacitinib tsDMARDs Targeted synthetic DMARDs TTO Time trade-off 4 Copyright 2021 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL PUBLISHED UK United Kingdom ULN Upper limit of normal UMC University Medical Centre USA United States of America WHO World Health Organization WTP Willingness-to-pay 5 Copyright 2021 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. All rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL PUBLISHED Table of Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 8 Table of Figures .............................................................................................................................. 12 1. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Critique of the decision problem in the company’s submission .......................................... 13 1.2 Summary of the key issues in the clinical effectiveness evidence ...................................... 13 1.3 Summary of the key issues in the cost effectiveness evidence ............................................ 15 1.4 Summary of the ERG’s preferred assumptions and resulting ICER ................................... 17 1.5 Summary of exploratory and sensitivity analyses undertaken by the ERG ......................... 17 2. BACKGROUND......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 20 2.2 Critique of company’s description of the underlying health problem ................................. 20 2.3 Critique of company’s overview of current service provision ............................................ 22 3. CRITIQUE OF COMPANY’S DEFINITION OF DECISION PROBLEM ........................ 26 3.1 Population ............................................................................................................................ 32 3.2 Intervention .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Clinical Policy: Baricitinib (Olumiant) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.291 Effective Date: 07.24.18 Last Review Date: 11.18 Revision Log
    Clinical Policy: Baricitinib (Olumiant) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.291 Effective Date: 07.24.18 Last Review Date: 11.18 Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Baricitinib (Olumiant®) is Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. FDA Approved Indication(s) Olumiant is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to one or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapies. Limitation(s) of use: Use of Olumiant in combination with other JAK inhibitors, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), or with potent immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and cyclosporine is not recommended. Policy/Criteria Provider must submit documentation (such as office chart notes, lab results or other clinical information) supporting that member has met all approval criteria. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Envolve Pharmacy Solutions™ that Olumiant is medically necessary when the following criteria are met: I. Initial Approval Criteria A. Rheumatoid Arthritis (must meet all): 1. Diagnosis of RA; 2. Prescribed by or in consultation with a rheumatologist; 3. Age ≥ 18 years; 4. Member meets one of the following (a or b): a. Failure of a ≥ 3 consecutive month trial of methotrexate (MTX) at up to maximally indicated doses, unless contraindicated or clinically significant adverse effects are experienced; b. If intolerance or contraindication to MTX (see Appendix D), failure of a ≥ 3 consecutive month trial of at least ONE conventional DMARD (e.g., sulfasalazine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine) at up to maximally indicated doses, unless contraindicated or clinically significant adverse effects are experienced; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/223101 Al 06 December 2018 (06.12.2018) W !P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/223101 Al 06 December 2018 (06.12.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: (71) Applicant: JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC. [US/US]; 400 A 61K 35/1 7 (20 15.0 1) A 61P 35/00 (2006 .0 1) Dexter Ave. N., Suite 1200, Seattle, WA 98109 (US). (21) International Application Number: (72) Inventor: ALBERTSON, Tina; 400 Dexter Ave. N., Suite PCT/US2018/035755 1200, Seattle, WA 98109 (US). (22) International Filing Date: (74) Agent: AHN, Sejin et al; Morrison & Foerster LLP, 1253 1 0 1 June 2018 (01 .06.2018) High Bluff Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92130-2040 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (30) Priority Data: AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, 62/5 14,774 02 June 2017 (02.06.2017) US CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, 62/5 15,530 05 June 2017 (05.06.2017) US DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, 62/521,366 16 June 2017 (16.06.2017) u s HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, 62/527,000 29 June 2017 (29.06.2017) u s KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 62/549,938 24 August 2017 (24.08.2017) u s MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 62/580,425 0 1 November 2017 (01 .11.2017) u s OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, 62/593,871 0 1 December 2017 (01 .12.2017) u s SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 62/596,764 08 December 2017 (08.12.2017) u s TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunosuppressant Drugs Therapy with COVID-19
    Immunosuppressant Drugs Therapy with COVID-19: Associated Risks, Drug-Drug Interactions & Contraindications Debjyoti Talukdar1, Diane Ignacio2, and Madan Mohan Gupta2 1Teerthanker Mahaveer University 2The University of the West Indies at St Augustine September 24, 2020 Abstract Immunosuppressant drugs like Etanercept, Mycophenolate mofetil, Sirolimus, Cyclosporine and Rituximab can weaken the immune system and make patients susceptible to SARS nCoV-2 virus. These drugs make immunocompromised persons more vulnerable to complications associated with COVID-19. Moreover, it can also increase the mortality and morbidity, as a weakened immune system can lead to longer duration of infection. This study discusses the guidelines on immunosuppressant drugs and its associated risk factors with COVID-19, issued by the U.S CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), WHO (World Health Organisation), U.S FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and other accredited global health organisa- tions. Moreover, it also includes information about pharmaceutical properties, mechanism of action, COVID-19 associated risk factors, adverse drug reactions, contraindications and drug-drug interactions. Our study will help government partners and international health organisations to better understand COVID-19 health risks associated with immunosuppressants. Increased public awareness about effective drug therapy for autoimmune diseases, cancer treatment, immunocompromised and organ transplant patients will help lower the mortality and morbidity associated with the disease amid COVID-19 pandemic. 1. INTRODUCTION As per the U.S Department of Health and Human Services and U.S FDA, immunosuppressant drugs can cause susceptibility to viruses leading to infection with increase in morbidity of the disease. It can cause severe risk of illness from COVID-19 due to a weakened immune system.
    [Show full text]
  • Benlysta® (Belimumab)
    UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs Program Number 2021 P 1227-6 Program Prior Authorization/Notification Medication Benlysta® (belimumab)* *This program applies to the subcutaneous formulation of belimumab P&T Approval Date 9/2017, 9/2018, 9/2019, 9/2020, 2/2021, 7/2021 Effective Date 10/1/2021; Oxford only: 10/1/2021 1. Background: Benlysta® is a B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS)-specific inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients aged 5 years and older with active, autoantibody-positive, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who are receiving standard therapy and adult patients with active lupus nephritis who are receiving standard therapy. Limitations of Use: The efficacy of Benlysta has not been evaluated in patients with severe active central nervous system lupus. Benlysta has not been studied in combination with other biologics. Use of Benlysta is not recommended in these situations. 2. Coverage Criteria: A. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 1. Initial Authorization a. Benlysta will be approved based on all of the following criteria: (1) Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus -AND- (2) Laboratory testing has documented the presence of autoantibodies [e.g., ANA, Anti-dsDNA, Anti-Sm, Anti-Ro/SSA, Anti-La/SSB] -AND- (3) Patient is currently receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy [e.g., hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, prednisone, azathioprine, methotrexate] -AND- (4) Patient does not have severe active central nervous system lupus -AND- (5) Patient is not receiving Benlysta in combination with either of the following: (a) Biologic DMARD [e.g., Enbrel (etanercept), Humira (adalimumab), Cimzia (certolizumab), Kineret (anakinra)] © 2021 UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc. 1 (b) Lupkynis (voclosporin) Authorization will be issued for 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment: Extract from Clinical Evaluation: Etanercept
    AusPAR Attachment 2 Extract from the Clinical Evaluation Report for etanercept Proprietary Product Name: Erelzi Sponsor: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd First round report: June 2017 Second round report: August 2017 Therapeutic Goods Administration About the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) · The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is part of the Australian Government Department of Health and is responsible for regulating medicines and medical devices. · The TGA administers the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act), applying a risk management approach designed to ensure therapeutic goods supplied in Australia meet acceptable standards of quality, safety and efficacy (performance) when necessary. · The work of the TGA is based on applying scientific and clinical expertise to decision- making, to ensure that the benefits to consumers outweigh any risks associated with the use of medicines and medical devices. · The TGA relies on the public, healthcare professionals and industry to report problems with medicines or medical devices. TGA investigates reports received by it to determine any necessary regulatory action. · To report a problem with a medicine or medical device, please see the information on the TGA website <https://www.tga.gov.au>. About AusPARs · An Australian Public Assessment Report (AusPAR) provides information about the evaluation of a prescription medicine and the considerations that led the TGA to approve or not approve a prescription medicine submission. · AusPARs are prepared and published by the TGA. · An AusPAR is prepared for submissions that relate to new chemical entities, generic medicines, major variations and extensions of indications. · An AusPAR is a static document; it provides information that relates to a submission at a particular point in time.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart Failure and Drug-Induced Lupus
    Unusual toxicities with TNF inhibition: Heart failure and drug-induced lupus J.J. Cush John J. Cush, MD, Chief, Rheumatology ABSTRACT demyelinating disease, cytopenias, auto- and Clinical Immunology, Presbyterian Serious and unexpected adverse events, immune disorders, and heart failure. Hospital of Dallas, Clinical Professor of such as heart failure and drug-induced Other essays in this volume address the Internal Medicine, The University of Texas lupus, have been reported in patients subject of infection (10), demyelination Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA. receiving TNF inhibitor therapy. These (11), and lymphoma (12). This review events generally are easily recogniz- will focus on heart failure and lupus- Please address correspondence to: John J. Cush, MD, Presbyterian Hospital able, although they cannot be predicted like disease, which are rarely seen in of Dallas, 8200 Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, nor avoided, other than by drug avoid- association with TNF inhibitor therapy Texax 75231-4496, USA. ance altogether. Many patients have and are currently without explanation. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2004; 22 (Suppl. 35): great benefit from anti-TNF therapies. S141-S147. Their intelligent use requires a firm Sources of data © Copyright CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL understanding of these rare toxicities, As a consequence of drug approval, RHEUMATOLOGY 2004. so as to minimize the morbidity associ- manufacturers have a responsibility to ated with their uncommon occurrence. collect safety data actively and report Key words: TNF inhibitors, conges- these data to the appropriate agencies. tive heart failure, drug-induced lupus, Introduction For example, in the USA a manufactur- rheumatoid arthritis. The introduction of biologic agents to er must submit periodic safety reports specifically inhibit the pro-inflammato- to the FDA twice yearly (March and ry cytokine, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), September).
    [Show full text]
  • New Biological Therapies: Introduction to the Basis of the Risk of Infection
    New biological therapies: introduction to the basis of the risk of infection Mario FERNÁNDEZ RUIZ, MD, PhD Unit of Infectious Diseases Hospital Universitario “12 de Octubre”, Madrid ESCMIDInstituto de Investigación eLibraryHospital “12 de Octubre” (i+12) © by author Transparency Declaration Over the last 24 months I have received honoraria for talks on behalf of • Astellas Pharma • Gillead Sciences • Roche • Sanofi • Qiagen Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Paul Ehrlich (1854-1915) • “side-chain” theory (1897) • receptor-ligand concept (1900) • “magic bullet” theory • foundation for specific chemotherapy (1906) • Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine (1908) (together with Metchnikoff) Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author 1981: B-1 antibody (tositumomab) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody 1997: FDA approval of rituximab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD20-positive NHL 2001: FDA approval of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Functional classification of targeted (biological) agents • Agents targeting soluble immune effector molecules • Agents targeting cell surface receptors
    [Show full text]
  • BCMA-Targeted Immunotherapy for Multiple Myeloma Bo Yu1, Tianbo Jiang2 and Delong Liu2*
    Yu et al. Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2020) 13:125 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00962-7 REVIEW Open Access BCMA-targeted immunotherapy for multiple myeloma Bo Yu1, Tianbo Jiang2 and Delong Liu2* Abstract B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a novel treatment target for multiple myeloma (MM) due to its highly selective expression in malignant plasma cells (PCs). Multiple BCMA-targeted therapeutics, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTE), have achieved remarkable clinical response in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Belantamab mafodotin-blmf (GSK2857916), a BCMA-targeted ADC, has just been approved for highly refractory MM. In this article, we summarized the molecular and physiological properties of BCMA as well as BCMA-targeted immunotherapeutic agents in different stages of clinical development. Keywords: B cell maturation antigen, BCMA, Belantamab mafodotin, CAR-T, Antibody-drug conjugate, Bispecific T cell engager Introduction B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) Recent advances in novel therapeutics such as prote- BCMA is encoded by a 2.92-kb TNFRSF17 gene located asome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs on the short arm of chromosome 16 (16p13.13) and (IMiD) have significantly improved the treatment out- composed of 3 exons separated by 2 introns (Fig. 1). comes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) [1–8]. BCMA is a 184 amino acid and 20.2-kDa type III trans- However, most MM patients eventually relapse due to membrane glycoprotein, with the extracellular N the development of drug resistance [9]. In addition, terminus containing a conserved motif of 6 cysteines many of the current popular target antigens, such as [18–21].
    [Show full text]
  • JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future
    biomolecules Review JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future 1, 2, , 3 1,4 Jacopo Angelini y , Rossella Talotta * y , Rossana Roncato , Giulia Fornasier , Giorgia Barbiero 1, Lisa Dal Cin 1, Serena Brancati 1 and Francesco Scaglione 5 1 Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (J.A.); [email protected] (G.F.); [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (L.D.C.); [email protected] (S.B.) 2 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Gaetano Martino”, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy 3 Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pordenone, 33081 Aviano, Italy; [email protected] 4 Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS-Burlo Garofolo di Trieste, 34137 Trieste, Italy 5 Head of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Director of Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20162 Milan, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-090-2111; Fax: +39-090-293-5162 Co-first authors. y Received: 16 May 2020; Accepted: 1 July 2020; Published: 5 July 2020 Abstract: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) belong to a new class of oral targeted disease-modifying drugs which have recently revolutionized the therapeutic panorama of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated diseases, placing alongside or even replacing conventional and biological drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol
    (rJ GI LEAi) Galapagos CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL Study Title: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Treatment of Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease (SBCD) Sponsor: Gilead Sciences, Inc. 333 Lakeside Drive Foster City, CA 94404, USA IND Number: 129646 EudraCT Number: 2016-003179-23 Clinical Trials.gov NCT03046056 Identifier: Indication: Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease Protocol ID: GS-US-419-4015 Contact Information: The medical monitor name and contact information will be provided on the Key Study Team Contact List. Protocol Original: 12 September 2016 Version/Date: Amendment 1: 16 December 2016 Amendment 2: 26 June 2017 Amendment 3: 04 February 2020 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT The information contained in this document, particularly unpublished data, is the property or under control of Gilead Sciences, Inc., and is provided to you in confidence as an investigator, potential investigator, or consultant, for review by you, your staff, and an applicable Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee. The information is only to be used by you in connection with authorized clinical studies of the investigational drug described in the protocol. You will not disclose any of the information to others without written authorization from Gilead Sciences, Inc., except to the extent necessary to obtain informed consent from those persons to whom the drug may be administered. Filgotinib Protocol GS-US-419-4015 Final Gilead Sciences, lnc. Amendment3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations from York and Scarborough Medicines
    Recommendations from York and Scarborough Medicines Commissioning Committee March 2021 Drug name Indication Recommendation, rationale and place in RAG status Potential full year cost impact therapy CCG commissioned Technology Appraisals 1. TA672: Brolucizumab for Brolucizumab is recommended as an option for treating wet Listed as RED Discussed and approved at Feb 2021 MCC meeting. treating wet age-related age-related macular degeneration in adults, only if, in the eye drug macular degeneration to be treated: the best-corrected visual acuity is between 6/12 and Commissioning: CCG, 6/96 tariff excluded there is no permanent structural damage to the central fovea the lesion size is less than or equal to 12 disc areas in greatest linear dimension and there is recent presumed disease progression (for example, blood vessel growth, as shown by fluorescein angiography, or recent visual acuity changes). It is recommended only if the company provides brolucizumab according to the commercial arrangement. If patients and their clinicians consider brolucizumab to be one of a range of suitable treatments, including aflibercept and ranibizumab, choose the least expensive (taking into account administration costs and commercial arrangements). Only continue brolucizumab in people who maintain an adequate response to therapy. Criteria for stopping should include persistent deterioration in visual acuity and identification of anatomical changes in the retina that indicate inadequate response to therapy. 2. TA675: Vernakalant for NICE is unable to make a recommendation about the Not listed No cost impact to CCGs as appraisal terminated by the rapid conversion of use in the NHS of vernakalant for the rapid conversion NICE and insufficient evidence to approve use.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbrel) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.250 Effective Date: 08.16 Last Review Date: 02.21 Coding Implications Line of Business: Medicaid Revision Log
    Clinical Policy: Etanercept (Enbrel) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.250 Effective Date: 08.16 Last Review Date: 02.21 Coding Implications Line of Business: Medicaid Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Etanercept (Enbrel®) is a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker. FDA Approved Indication(s) Enbrel is indicated for the treatment of: • For reducing signs and symptoms, inducing major clinical response, inhibiting the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Enbrel can be initiated in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or used alone. • For reducing signs and symptoms of moderately to severely active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in patients ages 2 and older • For reducing signs and symptoms, inhibiting the progression of structural damage of active arthritis, and improving physical function in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Enbrel can be used with or without methotrexate. • For reducing signs and symptoms in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) • For the treatment of patients 4 years or older with chronic moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy Policy/Criteria Provider must submit documentation (such as office chart notes, lab results or other clinical information) supporting that member has met all approval criteria. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that Enbrel is medically necessary when the following criteria are met: I. Initial Approval Criteria A. Ankylosing Spondylitis (must meet all): 1. Diagnosis of AS; 2. Prescribed by or in consultation with a rheumatologist; 3.
    [Show full text]