View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE
provided by CERN Document Server
August, 1995 hep-th/95mmnnn
Quaternions and Sp ecial Relativity
a)
Stefano De Leo
UniversitadiLecce, Dipartimento di Fisica
Instituto di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Lecce
Lecce, 73100, ITALY
Abstract
We reformulate Sp ecial Relativityby a quaternionic algebra on reals. Using real
linear quaternions,we show that previous diculties, concerning the appropriate
transformations on the 3 + 1 space-time, maybeovercome. This implies that a
complexi ed quaternionic version of Sp ecial Relativityisachoice and not a necessity.
a) e-mail: [email protected]
1 Intro duction
\The most remarkable formula in mathematics is:
i
e = cos + i sin : (1)
This is our jewel. Wemay relate the geometry to the algebra by representing complex
numb ers in a plane
i
x + iy = re :
This is the uni cation of algebra and geometry."-Feynman [1].
i
We know that a rotation of -angle around the z -axis, can b e represented by e ,
in fact
i i(+ )
e (x + iy )=re :
In 1843, Hamilton in the attempt to generalize the complex eld in order to describ e
1
the rotation in the three-dimensional space, discovered quaternions .
Today a rotation ab out an axis passing trough the origin and parallel to a given uni-
tary vector ~u (u ;u;u)by an angle , can b e obtained taking the transformation
x y z
(iu +ju +ku ) (iu +ju +ku )
x y z x y z
2 2
e (ix + jy + kz)e : (2)
Therefore if we wish to represent rotations in the three-dimensional space and com-
plete \the uni cation of algebra and geometry"we need quaternions.
The quaternionic algebra has b een exp ounded in a series of pap ers [2] and b o oks [3]
with particular reference to quantum mechanics, the reader may refer to these for
further details. For convenience we rep eat and develop the relevant p oints in the
following section, where the terminology is also de ned.
Nothing that U (1;q) is algebraically isomorphic to SU (2;c), the imaginary units
i; j; k can b e realized by means of the 2 2Pauli matrices through
(i; j; k ) $ (i ; i ; i ) :
3 2 1
(this particular representation of the imaginary units i; j; k has b een intro duced in ref. [4]).
So a quaternion q can b e represented bya 22 complex matrix
!
z z
1
2
q $ Q = ; (3)
z z
2
1
1
Quaternions, as used in this pap er, will always mean \real quaternions"
q = a + ib + jc + kd ; a; b; c; d 2R: 1
where
z = a + ib ; z = c id 2 C (1;i) :
1 2
It follows that a quaternion with unitary norm is identi ed by a unitary 2 2 matrix
2
with unit determinant, this gives the corresp ondence b etween unitary quaternions
U (1;q) and SU (2;c).
Let us consider the transformation law of a spinor (two-dimensional representations
of the rotation group)
0
= U ; (4)
where
!
z
1
= ; U2SU (2;c) :
z
2
We can immediately verify that
!