Dean Phil Weiser's First Year
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unscrambling the FCC's Net Neutrality Order: Preserving the Open Internetâ•Flbut Which
UNSCRAMBLING THE FCC's NET NEUTRALITY ORDER: PRESERVING THE OPEN INTERNET-BUT WHICH ONE? Larry Downest I. INTRODUCTION This article offers a critical reading of the Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC" or "Commission") December 23, 2010 Report and Order entitled "Preserving the Open Internet."I This year-long proceeding, concluded just as the 2010 lame duck Congress was about to adjourn, resulted in significant new regulations for some broadband Internet access providers. The new rules enact into law a version of what is sometimes referred to as the "net neutrality" principle. Proponents of net neutrality regulation argue that the Internet's defining feature-and the key to its unarguable success-is the content-neutral routing and transport of individual packets through the network by Internet service providers, a feature of the network that requires strong 2 protection and enforcement by the FCC. The FCC describes its new rules as rules of the road to ensure a "level playing field" for application and other service providers in accessing U.S. markets, consumers, and devices.3 t Larry Downes is Senior Adjunct Fellow with TechFreedom. His books include LARRY DOWNES, UNLEASHING THE KILLER APP: DIGITAL STRATEGIES FOR MARKET DOMINANCE (Harvard Business School Press 1998) and, most recently, LARRY DOWNES, THE LAWS OF DISRUPTION: HARNESSING THE NEW FORCES THAT GOVERN LIFE AND BUSINESS IN THE DIGITAL AGE (Basic Books 2009). This article was adapted from testimony delivered on February 15, 2011, before the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and Internet. Ensuring Competition on the Internet: Net Neutrality andAntitrustBefore the H. -
2019 These Thank-You Cards Came from Students at Reno’S Dorothy Lemelson STEM Academy Elementary School
THE GOOD NEWS Annual Report to Stakeholders 2019 These thank-you cards came from students at Reno’s Dorothy Lemelson STEM Academy Elementary School. Theirs was one of the first groups to come to the College for our Reading & Robes program, launched in 2019. n putting the nishing touches on this report describing events from 2019, we could not help thinking that 2019 seems like a long time ago. Classroom instruction at the NJC, like virtually all colleges and schools, remains on hold because of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Massive protests continue over police brutality and racial injustice. Political Idivisions within the United States, which many already consider to be the worst since the Civil War, only seem to deepen. In these troubled times, we are heartened by your continuing support of our institution and its mission: to make the world a more just place by educating and inspiring the judiciary. We hope you take encouragement and inspiration from what you read in these pages. Our expanding Reading & Robes program is teaching disadvantaged children how justice is supposed to work and about their civic responsibilities. An NJC alumnus helped make the world a safer place for children in Pennsylvania by helping expose cruel crimes. An alumna in Louisiana is helping young victims of human tracking see a brighter future. In Colorado, NJC judges are leading a coaching program that promises a healthier, more sustainable and expert judiciary. “e arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” An abolitionist minister spoke these words in 1871. -
The FCC's Knowledge Problem: How to Protect Consumers Online
The FCC’s Knowledge Problem: How to Protect Consumers Online Hon. Maureen K. Ohlhausen* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A FRAMEWORK FOR THINKING ABOUT REGULATION: COMPARING THE FCC AND THE FTC .................................................................. 205 A. The Regulator’s Knowledge Problem....................................... 206 B. The FCC’s Prescriptive, Ex Ante Regulatory Approach .......... 208 C. The FTC’s Flexible, Ex Post Enforcement-Based Approach ... 212 II. NET NEUTRALITY AND THE FCC: A CASE STUDY IN REGULATORY DIFFICULTY ..................................................................................... 214 A. What is Net Neutrality? ............................................................ 215 1. Proponents of Net Neutrality Regulation .......................... 215 2. Opponents of Net Neutrality Regulation .......................... 216 B. The FCC’s History of Broadband Regulation: The Road to Reclassification ........................................................................ 218 1. Broadband as a Title I information service ....................... 218 2. The Verizon Decision ........................................................ 220 3. The Aftermath of Verizon ................................................. 221 Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission. I would like to thank Neil Chilson for his contributions to this essay. The views expressed here are solely my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or any other individual Commissioner. Portions of this essay were adapted from a keynote -
April 26, 2021 the Honorable Dick
April 26, 2021 The Honorable Dick Durbin The Honorable Chuck Grassley Chair Ranking Member Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Judiciary Committee 711 Hart Senate Building 135 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Jerrold Nadler The Honorable Jim Jordan Chair Ranking Member House Judiciary Committee House Judiciary Committee 2138 Rayburn Building 2142 Rayburn Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Sheila Jackson Lee The Honorable Andy Biggs Chair Ranking Member Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security Security 2138 Rayburn Building 2142 Rayburn Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chair Durbin, Ranking Member Grassley, Chair Nadler, and Ranking Member Jordan: We, the undersigned attorneys general, strongly urge you to pass the EAGLES Act, which reauthorizes and expands the work of the Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center (NTAC) to provide research-based threat assessment training. The EAGLES Act was introduced after the mass shooting at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida and establishes a national program to prevent targeted school violence by facilitating evidence-based collaboration between state and federal agencies. The Act’s safe school initiative contains research and training components, allows dissemination of evidence-based practices, and authorizes NTAC to consult with state and local educational, law enforcement, and mental health officials to develop research and training. It is unfortunate we have to turn to the threat assessment expertise of the Secret Service in order to keep educators and students safe at school, but gun violence in schools has become all too commonplace. -
The High Cost of Doing Nothing on Net Neutrality Introduction
ISSUE BRIEF: Q4 2019 UPDATE THE HIGH COST OF DOING NOTHING ON NET NEUTRALITY INTRODUCTION Business Forward has organized hundreds of briefings across the country on technology and innovation, collecting recommendations from local business leaders on a range of issues, from how to protect IP to helping small businesses use the internet to find new markets. Few issues are as important – or contentious – as net neutrality. This issue brief explains why net neutrality matters and offers a path to achieving it. The term “net neutrality” was coined in 2003, capturing the belief that the best way to ensure an open and vital internet is to prevent network operators from interfering with traffic to favor data from some sites or applications over others. Without net neutrality, network operators could censor viewpoints, stifle startups by charging exorbitant tolls, or undermine competition by favoring their own web offerings over their competitors’ offerings. With net neutrality, companies operating at the “edge” of the network are more likely to invest in distance learning, telemedicine, media streaming, and other new, data-intensive businesses. FOUR DIFFERENT FCC CHAIRS, SERVING TWO PRESIDENTS, SUPPORTED NET NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLES, POLICIES OR RULES – BUT THEY LACKED CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THEM. The FCC began working on ways to promote net neutrality in 2004. Four different FCC chairs (Michael Powell, Kevin Martin, Julius Genachowski, and Tom Wheeler) serving two presidents (George W. Bush, Barack Obama) issued net neutrality principles, policies or rules. But federal courts or subsequent FCC orders struck down these efforts. Martin’s “policy statement” was found to be unenforceable because it wasn’t a formal regulation. -
Prepared Remarks of Chairman Julius Genachowski Federal Communications Commission 10Th Annual Seixas Award Dinner Low Memorial L
Prepared Remarks of Chairman Julius Genachowski Federal Communications Commission 10th Annual Seixas Award Dinner Low Memorial Library at Columbia University New York City April 27, 2010 On Receipt of the Gershom Mendes Seixas Award Thank you, Dean Lehecka. For so many of us you’ve been the heart and soul of this great school, and it’s a particular honor for me to have you present this award. Thank you to the Columbia/Barnard Hillel, and in particular Dr. Judy Schwartz and Simon Klarfeld. Thank you Robert Kraft. We are moved by your words of unity tonight, and by your long list of stunning accomplishments, including the rebuilding of the Hillel here. Congratulations to my longtime friend Jay Lefkowitz. Considering our somewhat divergent political paths – Jay working for Presidents Bush 41 and 43, I for President Obama and Senator Schumer -- I don’t always cheer when Jay is on the winning side. But tonight is certainly not one of those times. Jay richly deserves this award, and I applaud him. A few months ago, someone called saying they wanted to give me an award whose previous recipients include Robert Kraft, Arthur Sulzberger, Edgar Bronfman, and Herman Wouk. My immediate thought was … they’ve made a mistake. Growing up I rooted for the Jets, not the Patriots. I read Newsday more than the New York Times. I’ve been very fortunate to work with Edgar Bronfman Junior, but have never met his father. And then I realized. I was finally being acknowledged for something I’ve accomplished that I didn’t know anyone knew about, but of which I’m quite proud: Reading every word of every one of Herman Wouk’s great books. -
September 2, 2021
September 2, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Senate Majority Leader Senate Minority Leader 322 Hart Senate Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy 1236 Longworth House Office Building 2468 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Leader Schumer, Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy, As our jurisdictions’ Attorneys General, we are responsible for protecting the health, safety, and well-being of our residents. Although our jurisdictions vary in size, geography, and political composition, we are united in our commitment to an effective criminal justice system that safeguards the communities of our states. To that end, a bipartisan coalition of Attorneys General supported the passage of the First Step Act of 2018—landmark legislation that brought common sense improvements to myriad aspects of the criminal justice system. Central to these reforms was retroactive relief for individuals sentenced under the discredited 100-to-1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio that Congress abolished in 2010. Following the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Terry v. United States, however, the lowest level crack cocaine offenders remain categorically ineligible for resentencing. We write today to urge Congress to amend the First Step Act, and to clarify that its retroactive relief applies to all individuals sentenced under the prior regime. Congress enacted the historic First Step Act of 2018 to modernize the criminal justice system, implementing comprehensive reform in areas such as corrections, criminal charging, community re-entry, and beyond. -
1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 10-Q
1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2001. -------------- OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO _______. Commission File Number 1-12793 ------- STARTEK, INC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) DELAWARE 84-1370538 ------------------------------- ------------------- (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.) 100 GARFIELD STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80206 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE) (303) 361-6000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (FORMER NAME, FORMER ADDRESS AND FORMER FISCAL YEAR, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- --- Indicate the number of shares -
January 12, 2021 the Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney
January 12, 2021 The Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Acting Attorney General Rosen: We, the undersigned state attorneys general, are committed to the protection of public safety, the rule of law, and the U.S. Constitution. We are appalled that on January 6, 2021, rioters invaded the U.S. Capitol, defaced the building, and engaged in a range of criminal conduct—including unlawful entry, theft, destruction of U.S. government property, and assault. Worst of all, the riot resulted in the deaths of individuals, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer, and others were physically injured. Beyond these harms, the rioters’ actions temporarily paused government business of the most sacred sort in our system—certifying the result of a presidential election. We all just witnessed a very dark day in America. The events of January 6 represent a direct, physical challenge to the rule of law and our democratic republic itself. Together, we will continue to do our part to repair the damage done to institutions and build a more perfect union. As Americans, and those charged with enforcing the law, we must come together to condemn lawless violence, making clear that such actions will not be allowed to go unchecked. Thank you for your consideration of and work on this crucial priority. Sincerely Phil Weiser Karl A. Racine Colorado Attorney General District of Columbia Attorney General Lawrence Wasden Douglas Peterson Idaho Attorney General Nebraska Attorney General Steve Marshall Clyde “Ed” Sniffen, Jr. Alabama Attorney General Acting Alaska Attorney General Mark Brnovich Leslie Rutledge Arizona Attorney General Arkansas Attorney General Xavier Becerra William Tong California Attorney General Connecticut Attorney General Kathleen Jennings Ashley Moody Delaware Attorney General Florida Attorney General Christopher M. -
20200721 COVID Scams U.S. Senate
“Protecting America from COVID-19 Scams” Presented to the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Subcommittee on Manufacturing, Trade and Consumer Protection By Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt July 21, 2020 Chairman Moran, Ranking Minority Member Blumenthal, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for the opportunity to present this testimony as the committee discusses the unfortunate reality that scam artists are exploiting this global pandemic in attempts to profit unlawfully. I appreciate the invitation to offer the perspective of a state attorney general’s office and share the types of scams that are being reported to our office, the ways our office is responding and the cooperative work we have engaged in with federal partners. Expectations and Preparations While none of us has experienced a global pandemic on the scale of COVID-19, our office has had plenty of experience dealing with more localized disasters, such as tornadoes and floods. We know from that experience that scam artists often take advantage of those situations to prey on people during a time of distress and disruption. We expected COVID-19 would be no different. On March 12, our office issued the first consumer alert advising Kansans to keep up their guard and watch out for COVID-19-related scams, such as bogus products advertised as coronavirus prevention measures or treatments as well as bogus charities purporting to raise money for coronavirus research or to support coronavirus patients. Later that same day, the governor of Kansas declared a state of emergency related to COVID-19, which triggered the Kansas price-gouging statute within the Kansas Consumer Protection Act. -
If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. National Criminal Justice Reference Service i ";0; nCJrs This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. r;, ;,' "'. { f: t !~ 1 '1, ~ f'~ :1 1- i C :; 11111'2·8 /////2.5 \ i:- 1.0 W [[[[[~~ w 2.2 W ,~~ I Il.I J:i J:. I~ .0 ... u I 1.1 &:.11.:1,1..;. --- ,!~ 125 11111 . 111111.4 . [11111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A u.~. Department of Just/ce Nahoililllnstitute of Justice This document has been re rodu or organization ,as received lrom the pers~n Origin~tin g .~e~ ~xact/y m this document are those o1 t I, omts 01 view or opinions stated Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with represent the official position 0 he I?~thors and do not necessarily the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Justice, r po IC es of the National Institute of Permission to reproduce this' , granted by ~d matenal has been Points of view or opinions stated in this document are Ch j Af ,lusti ce _ Pan 1 \T H C 1 r ---~ -- uOdges those of the author(s) and do not represent the official o orado ,Ind j cia J Dept. 7 _ position or policies of the U. -
Object - Photo Report
Object - Photo Report 82.57.5 Name Moving image Photographer Kingery, Hugh Title Skiing in Colorado Non-original Title Skiing in Colorado Description Black-and-white 16mm movie on cellulose acetate film stock made circa 1950-1955, shot by Hugh Kingery. The film has not been reviewed (as of 7/16/2015) but appears to depict skiing in Colorado. The film is approximately 200 ft. in length. This film is #1 in a series of 3. Inscription The film reel in in a cardboard box with a Colorado Historical Society label. It reads: "Skiing in Colorado / 16mm film by Mr. Kingery / Gift of Mrs. Elinor Kingery / 4629 East Cedar Denver, Colorado 80222 / June 1982" ; Handwritten on label: "1982 prints" Subject Skis and skiing--Colorado, Amateur films Provenance Gift of Elinor Kingery, 1982. Collection Name Hugh M. and Elinor Kingery collection (Ph.00244) 82.57.6 Name Moving image Photographer Kingery, Hugh Title Skiing in Colorado Non-original Title Skiing in Colorado Description Black-and-white 16mm home movie on cellulose acetate film stock made circa 1950-1955, shot by Hugh Kingery. The film has not been reviewed (as of 7/16/2015) but appears to depict skiing in Colorado. The film is approximately 100 ft. in length. This film is #2 in a series of 3. Inscription The film reel in in a cardboard box with a Colorado Historical Society label. It reads: "Skiing in Colorado / 16mm film by Mr. Kingery / Gift of Mrs. Elinor Kingery / 4629 East Cedar Denver, Colorado 80222 / June 1982" ; Handwritten on label: "1982 prints" Subject Skis and skiing--Colorado Provenance Gift of Elinor Kingery, 1982.