WATBCP-WA-Leprosy-Guideline.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WATBCP-WA-Leprosy-Guideline.Pdf Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Leprosy February 2019 Contents Chapter 1 9 1.0 Introduction 9 References 11 Chapter 2 Epidemiology 12 2.1 Global epidemiology 12 2.2 National epidemiology 13 2.3 Western Australia epidemiology 14 References 16 Chapter 3 Global Considerations 17 References 18 Chapter 4 Case definition 19 References 21 Chapter 5 Diagnosis of Leprosy 22 5.1 Clinical diagnosis 22 5.1.1 Presentation 22 5.1.2 Skin examination 23 5.1.3 Nerve palpation 24 5.1.4 Assessment of nerve function 25 5.1.5 Pain assessment 29 5.1.6 Eye Examination 30 5.1.7 Leprosy in Children 32 5.2 Laboratory Diagnosis 33 5.2.1 Introduction 33 5.2.2 Slit skin smears 33 5.2.3 Skin biopsy 35 5.2.4 Nerve biopsy and fine needle aspiration. 36 5.2.5 Molecular testing 37 5.2.6 Susceptibility testing 37 5.2.7 Quality control 39 5.2.8 Laboratory notification of results 39 5.3 Other diagnostic tools 39 5.3.1 Nerve conduction studies 39 5.3.2 Imaging 39 5.4 Disease Classification and Assessment 40 5.4.1 Introduction 40 Page 2 of 150 5.4.2 Ridley-Jopling classification 42 5.4.3 WHO Classification 42 5.4.4 NLEP Classification 42 5.4.5 Disability Grading 43 5.4.6 Case notification 45 5.4.7 Functional assessment 45 References 47 Chapter 6 Medical Treatment of Leprosy 50 6.1 Introduction 50 6.2 Principles of drug therapy for leprosy 51 6.3 Pre-treatment investigations and documentation 51 6.4 Treatment planning 51 6.5 Treatment Regimens 52 6.5.1 Patient monitoring while receiving leprosy treatment 53 6.5.2 Treatment completion 55 6.5.3 Follow up after completion of therapy 55 6.6 Alternative regimens 58 6.7 Regimens for drug-resistant leprosy 59 6.8 Adverse drug effects 59 6.9 Special considerations 60 6.9.1 Pregnancy 60 6.9.2 Co-existent active tuberculosis 61 6.9.3 Co-existent latent tuberculosis 61 6.9.4 Co-existent Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection 61 6.9.5 Treatment interruption and default 62 6.10 Retreatment 63 6.10.1 Definitions 63 6.10.2 Differentiating relapse from reactional state 63 6.10.3 Management of retreatment cases 65 References 66 Chapter 7 Diagnosis and Management of Neuritis and Reactional States 68 7.1 Diagnosis of neuritis and reactional states 68 7.1.1 Introduction 68 7.1.2 Neuritis 69 7.1.3 Type 1 Reaction 69 7.1.4 Erythema Nodosum Leprosum 71 7.1.5 Lucio’s Phenomenon 73 Page 3 of 156 7.2 Treatment of neuritis and lepra reactions 74 7.2.1 Introduction 74 7.2.2 Type 1 Reaction and acute neuritis 74 7.2.3 Treatment of Erythema Nodosum Leprosum 80 7.2.4 Treatment of Lucio’s Phenomenon 82 References 83 Chapter 8 Prevention and management of disability 85 8.1 Introduction 85 8.2 Early detection and treatment 86 8.3 Accurate assessment of disability at the time of diagnosis and at subsequent assessment 87 8.4 Early detection and treatment of leprosy reactions and acute neuritis 87 8.5 Self-care 88 8.6 Access to a multidisciplinary team 90 8.6.1 Reconstructive surgery 91 8.7 Ongoing surveillance 91 References 92 Chapter 9 Case Management 93 9.1 Introduction 93 9.2 Components of case management 94 9.3 Case detection 94 9.4 Assessment 94 9.5 Care planning 95 9.5.1 Case management meeting 95 9.6 Care coordination 96 9.6.1 Medication management 97 9.6.2 Self-care support 99 9.6.3 Advocacy and negotiation 99 9.6.4 Psychosocial support 100 9.6.5 Clinical handover 100 9.6.6 Monitoring and review 100 9.7 Case closure 101 References 102 Chapter 10 Prevention of Leprosy 103 10.1 Introduction 103 10.2 BCG Vaccination 103 10.2.1 Western Australia BCG Policy 104 Page 4 of 156 10.3 Chemoprophylaxis 105 10.3.1 Review of evidence 105 10.3.2 WHO Recommendations 106 10.3.3 Western Australian recommendations 106 10.3.4 Process for Chemoprophylaxis 107 References 108 Chapter 11 Contact Tracing 110 11.1 Rationale 110 11.1.1 Transmission 110 11.1.2 Incubation period 110 11.2 Governance 111 11.3 Definitions 111 11.3.1 Index Case 111 11.3.2 Household (close) contacts 111 11.3.3 Community contacts 111 11.4. Extent of contact tracing 112 11.4.1 Timeframe 112 11.4.2 Who to contact trace 112 11.5 Procedure for contact tracing 112 11.5.1 Review of Index case 112 11.5.2 Stratification of Contact List 112 11.5.3 Contact screening 113 11.6 Other considerations 114 11.6.1 Maintaining confidentiality of the index case 114 11.6.2 Contacts declining screening 114 11.6.3 Media attention 114 References 115 Chapter 12 Notification of leprosy and enhanced surveillance 116 12.1 Introduction 116 12.2 Statutory medical notifications 116 12.3 Case definition for leprosy 116 12.4 Notification and surveillance process 117 12.4.1 Western Australia 117 12.4.2 National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) 118 References 119 Appendix 1 Template for skin examination 120 Page 5 of 156 Appendix 2 Guide to performing a VMT-ST: Referral centre (See Appendix 4 for guide to performing VMT-ST) 121 Appendix 3 Guide to performing a VMT-ST: Peripheral centre 123 Appendix 4 Guide to performing a VMT-ST and palpating peripheral nerves 124 Appendix 5 DN4 – Questionnaire 126 Appendix 6 Laboratory reporting for Mycobacterium leprae drug resistance testing 127 Form 1 Mycobacterium leprae drug resistance testing: Clinical report form 127 Form 2 Testing laboratory report 128 Form 3 Reporting form for treatment outcomes of resistant cases 130 Appendix 7 ISF Score Summary Sheet 131 Appendix 8 Leprosy Enhanced Surveillance Form 132 Appendix 9 WHOQOL-BREF 135 Scoring 139 Appendix 10(a) Leprosy clinical care template PB leprosy 140 Appendix 10(b) Leprosy clinical care template MB leprosy BI 1-3+ 141 Appendix 10(c) Leprosy clinical care template MB leprosy BI 4-6+ 142 Appendix 11 Drugs used to treat leprosy 143 Appendix 12 Type 1 reaction severity scale 145 Appendix 13 Enlist ENL Severity Scale 147 Appendix 14 DOT Log Sheet 149 Appendix 15 Leprosy contact screening form for consideration of chemoprophylaxis 151 Appendix 16 Guideline for leprosy contact tracing in Western Australia 152 Appendix 17 Notification form 153 Page 6 of 156 List of Abbreviations AFB Acid Fast Bacilli BB Borderline-borderline BCG Bacillus Calmette-Guerin BI Bacillary index BL Borderline-lepromatous BT Borderline-tuberculoid CDCD Communicable Disease Control Directorate CDNA Communicable Diseases Network Australia CMI Cell mediated immunity DN4 Douleur Neuropathique en 4 DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid DOT Directly observed therapy EHF Eye hand foot score ENL Erythema nodosum leprosum FD-MDT Fixed duration multi drug therapy G2D Grade 2 Disability GLP Global Leprosy Program Hpf High power field HRUS High resolution ultrasonography ISF Impairment severity form LL Lepromatous-leprosy MDT Multi drug therapy MI morphological index MRC Medical Research Council MRL Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory NCS Nerve conduction studies NFI Nerve function injury NNDSS National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction PEP Post exposure prophylaxis POD Prevention of Disability QEII Queen Elizabeth II (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital) ROM Rifampicin Ofloxacin Minocycline SDR Single dose rifampicin SSS Slit skin smear ST Sensory testing T1R Type 1 reaction TB Tuberculosis TT Tuberculoid VMT-ST Voluntary muscle testing-sensory testing WA Western Australia Page 7 of 156 WANIDD Western Australian Notifiable Infectious Disease Database WGS Whole Genome Sequencing WHO World Health Organization Page 8 of 156 Chapter 1 1.0 Introduction Leprosy (also known as Hansen’s disease) is chronic granulomatous disease caused by infection with Mycobacterium leprae. The disease is characterised by skin lesions and nerve damage, with involvement of the respiratory tract, eyes, and other organs occurring less commonly. The diagnosis of leprosy is based primarily on the clinical findings of peripheral nerve enlargement, characteristic skin lesions (hypoanaesthetic hypopigmented or reddish), and compatible microbiology (presence of acid-fast bacilli in skin smears or biopsies) or histopathology. The disease is classified broadly into two categories based on the number of skin lesions; paucibacillary leprosy (2-5 lesions) and multibacillary leprosy (6 or more lesions). A three-drug regimen is used for treatment, with duration determined by disease classification. Case management is an important component of treatment, ensuring optimisation of drug therapy, early detection of lepra reactions and provision of social support. Identification and surveillance of contacts plays an important role in the prevention of leprosy, facilitating early diagnosis of secondary cases and provision of chemoprophylaxis if indicated. The clinical manifestations of leprosy are determined largely by the host immune response to M.leprae, with the spectrum of disease ranging from localised cutaneous disease, to disseminated disease with widespread skin lesions and nerve involvement. While leprosy is not considered to be a highly contagious disease, the dynamics of transmission are not well understood. Susceptibility to disease is believed to be influenced by genetic determinants, with the majority of people unlikely to develop infection if exposed. The incubation period is highly variable and potentially very long, ranging from 2-30 years. The sequelae of disease including stigma, psychological suffering and deformity contribute to a significant burden which affects the patient well beyond completion of drug therapy. A long -term sustainable approach is therefore required to address the public health and individual consequences of leprosy.
Recommended publications
  • Infant Antibiotic Exposure Search EMBASE 1. Exp Antibiotic Agent/ 2
    Infant Antibiotic Exposure Search EMBASE 1. exp antibiotic agent/ 2. (Acedapsone or Alamethicin or Amdinocillin or Amdinocillin Pivoxil or Amikacin or Aminosalicylic Acid or Amoxicillin or Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination or Amphotericin B or Ampicillin or Anisomycin or Antimycin A or Arsphenamine or Aurodox or Azithromycin or Azlocillin or Aztreonam or Bacitracin or Bacteriocins or Bambermycins or beta-Lactams or Bongkrekic Acid or Brefeldin A or Butirosin Sulfate or Calcimycin or Candicidin or Capreomycin or Carbenicillin or Carfecillin or Cefaclor or Cefadroxil or Cefamandole or Cefatrizine or Cefazolin or Cefixime or Cefmenoxime or Cefmetazole or Cefonicid or Cefoperazone or Cefotaxime or Cefotetan or Cefotiam or Cefoxitin or Cefsulodin or Ceftazidime or Ceftizoxime or Ceftriaxone or Cefuroxime or Cephacetrile or Cephalexin or Cephaloglycin or Cephaloridine or Cephalosporins or Cephalothin or Cephamycins or Cephapirin or Cephradine or Chloramphenicol or Chlortetracycline or Ciprofloxacin or Citrinin or Clarithromycin or Clavulanic Acid or Clavulanic Acids or clindamycin or Clofazimine or Cloxacillin or Colistin or Cyclacillin or Cycloserine or Dactinomycin or Dapsone or Daptomycin or Demeclocycline or Diarylquinolines or Dibekacin or Dicloxacillin or Dihydrostreptomycin Sulfate or Diketopiperazines or Distamycins or Doxycycline or Echinomycin or Edeine or Enoxacin or Enviomycin or Erythromycin or Erythromycin Estolate or Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate or Ethambutol or Ethionamide or Filipin or Floxacillin or Fluoroquinolones
    [Show full text]
  • Infection of the CNS by Scedosporium Apiospermum After Near Drowning
    205 CASE REPORT J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.2003.8680 on 27 January 2004. Downloaded from Infection of the CNS by Scedosporium apiospermum after near drowning. Report of a fatal case and analysis of its confounding factors P A Kowacs, C E Soares Silvado, S Monteiro de Almeida, M Ramos, K Abra˜o, L E Madaloso, R L Pinheiro, L C Werneck ............................................................................................................................... J Clin Pathol 2004;57:205–207. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2003.8680 from the usual 15 days to up to 130 days. This type of This report describes a fatal case of central nervous system infection causes granulomata or abscesses and neutrophilic pseudallescheriasis. A 32 year old white man presented with meningitis.125 headache and meningismus 15 days after nearly drowning in a swine sewage reservoir. Computerised tomography and ‘‘In cases secondary to aspiration after near drowning, magnetic resonance imaging of the head revealed multiple once in the bloodstream, fungi seed into several sites but brain granulomata, which vanished when steroid and broad develop mainly in the central nervous system’’ spectrum antimicrobial and antifungal agents, in addition to dexamethasone, were started. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis To date, few cases of CNS pseudallescheriasis have been 2 disclosed a neutrophilic meningitis. Treatment with antibiotics described. However, such a diagnosis must should always be sought in individuals who have suffered near drowning in and amphotericin B, together with fluconazole and later standing polluted streams, ponds of water or sewage, or pits itraconazole, was ineffective. Miconazole was added with manure. through an Ommaya reservoir, but was insufficient to halt The case of a man who acquired a CNS P boydii infection the infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Adverse Events After Immunisation- Common and Uncommon
    Adverse events following Immunisation Common and Uncommon Dr Anna Clarke National Immunisation Office September 2016 www.immunisation.ie Abbreviations • ADR-adverse drug reaction • AE- adverse event • AEFI-adverse event following immunisation • SAE- serious adverse event • SUSAR-suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction Definitions • Adverse Drug Reaction – A response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, …occurs at doses normally used for the prophylaxis,.. or therapy of disease, … • Adverse Event – Any untoward medical occurrence that may present during treatment with a pharmaceutical product but which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment Definitions Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) Any untoward medical occurrence which follows immunisation and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the usage of the vaccine. The adverse event may be any unfavourable or unintended sign, abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease. AEFI 1. Loose definition to encourage reporting - does not restrict type of event - does not limit the time after immunisation - events, not reactions, are reported 2. Belief that immunisation was responsible may be correct, incorrect, or impossible to assess 3. Does not imply causality AEFIs Mild Reactions – Common – Include pain, swelling, fever, irritability, malaise – Self-limiting, seldom requiring symptomatic treatment But - important to inform parents about such events so they know about them Serious Adverse Event • Fatal • Life-threatening •
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0304998 A1 Sem (43) Pub
    US 20100304998A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0304998 A1 Sem (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 2, 2010 (54) CHEMICAL PROTEOMIC ASSAY FOR Related U.S. Application Data OPTIMIZING DRUG BINDING TO TARGET (60) Provisional application No. 61/217,585, filed on Jun. PROTEINS 2, 2009. (75) Inventor: Daniel S. Sem, New Berlin, WI Publication Classification (US) (51) Int. C. GOIN 33/545 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: GOIN 27/26 (2006.01) ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP C40B 30/04 (2006.01) 100 EAST WISCONSINAVENUE, SUITE 1100 (52) U.S. Cl. ............... 506/9: 436/531; 204/456; 435/7.1 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (73) Assignee: MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY, Disclosed herein are methods related to drug development. Milwaukee, WI (US) The methods typically include steps whereby an existing drug is modified to obtain a derivative form or whereby an analog (21) Appl. No.: 12/792,398 of an existing drug is identified in order to obtain a new therapeutic agent that preferably has a higher efficacy and (22) Filed: Jun. 2, 2010 fewer side effects than the existing drug. Patent Application Publication Dec. 2, 2010 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2010/0304998 A1 augavpop, Patent Application Publication Dec. 2, 2010 Sheet 2 of 22 US 2010/0304998 A1 g Patent Application Publication Dec. 2, 2010 Sheet 3 of 22 US 2010/0304998 A1 Patent Application Publication Dec. 2, 2010 Sheet 4 of 22 US 2010/0304998 A1 tg & Patent Application Publication Dec. 2, 2010 Sheet 5 of 22 US 2010/0304998 A1 Patent Application Publication Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewer Guidance
    Reviewer Guidance Conducting a Clinical Safety Review of a New Product Application and Preparing a Report on the Review U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) February 2005 Good Review Practices Reviewer Guidance Conducting a Clinical Safety Review of a New Product Application and Preparing a Report on the Review Additional copies are available from: Office of Training and Communication Division of Drug Information, HFD-240 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 (Tel) 301-827-4573 http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) February 2005 Good Review Practices TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 II. GENERAL GUIDANCE ON THE CLINICAL SAFETY REVIEW .......................... 2 A. Introduction....................................................................................................................................2 B. Explanation of Terms ....................................................................................................................3 C. Overview of the Safety Review .....................................................................................................4 D. Differences in Approach to Safety and Effectiveness Data ........................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • AHRQ Quality Indicators Fact Sheet
    AHRQ Quality Indicators Toolkit Fact Sheet on Inpatient Quality Indicators What are the Inpatient Quality Indicators? The Inpatient Quality Indicators (IQIs) include 28 provider-level indicators established by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) that can be used with hospital inpatient discharge data to provide a perspective on quality. They are grouped into the following four sets: • Volume indicators are proxy, or indirect, measures of quality based on counts of admissions during which certain intensive, high-technology, or highly complex procedures were performed. They are based on evidence suggesting that hospitals performing more of these procedures may have better outcomes. • Mortality indicators for inpatient procedures include procedures for which mortality has been shown to vary across institutions and for which there is evidence that high mortality may be associated with poorer quality of care. • Mortality indicators for inpatient conditions include conditions for which mortality has been shown to vary substantially across institutions and for which evidence suggests that high mortality may be associated with deficiencies in the quality of care. • Utilization indicators examine procedures whose use varies significantly across hospitals and for which questions have been raised about overuse, underuse, or misuse. Mortality for Selected Procedures and Mortality for Selected Conditions are composite measures that AHRQ established in 2008. Each composite is estimated as a weighted average, across a set of IQIs, of the ratio of a hospital’s observed rate (OR) to its expected rate (ER), based on a reference population: OR/ER. The IQI-specific ratios are adjusted for reliability before they are averaged, to minimize the influence of ratios that are high or low at a specific hospital by chance.
    [Show full text]
  • Interventions for Treating Acute High Altitude Illness
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Interventions for treating acute high altitude illness Simancas‑Racines, Daniel; Arevalo‑Rodriguez, Ingrid; Osorio, Dimelza; Franco, Juan V.A.; Xu, Yihan; Hidalgo, Ricardo 2018 Simancas‑Racines, D., Arevalo‑Rodriguez, I., Osorio, D., Franco, J. V., Xu, Y., & Hidalgo, R. Interventions for treating acute high altitude illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (6), CD009567‑. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009567.pub2 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82999 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009567.pub2 © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. All rights reserved. This paper was published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and is made available with permission of The Cochrane Collaboration. Downloaded on 28 Sep 2021 20:37:23 SGT [Intervention Review] Interventions for treating acute high altitude illness Daniel Simancas-Racines1, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez1,2,3, Dimelza Osorio1, Juan VA Franco4, Yihan Xu5, Ricardo Hidalgo1 1Cochrane Ecuador. Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC). Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Quito, Ecuador. 2Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramon y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain. 3CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. 4Argentine Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universi- tario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore City, Singapore Contact address: Daniel Simancas-Racines, Cochrane Ecuador. Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC). Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Quito, Ecuador. [email protected], [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Lääkeaineiden Yleisnimet (INN-Nimet) 21.6.2021
    Lääkealan turvallisuus- ja kehittämiskeskus Säkerhets- och utvecklingscentret för läkemedelsområdet Finnish Medicines Agency Lääkeaineiden yleisnimet (INN-nimet) 21.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Tariff - Schedule
    CUSTOMS TARIFF - SCHEDULE 99 - i Chapter 99 SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION PROVISIONS - COMMERCIAL Notes. 1. The provisions of this Chapter are not subject to the rule of specificity in General Interpretative Rule 3 (a). 2. Goods which may be classified under the provisions of Chapter 99, if also eligible for classification under the provisions of Chapter 98, shall be classified in Chapter 98. 3. Goods may be classified under a tariff item in this Chapter and be entitled to the Most-Favoured-Nation Tariff or a preferential tariff rate of customs duty under this Chapter that applies to those goods according to the tariff treatment applicable to their country of origin only after classification under a tariff item in Chapters 1 to 97 has been determined and the conditions of any Chapter 99 provision and any applicable regulations or orders in relation thereto have been met. 4. The words and expressions used in this Chapter have the same meaning as in Chapters 1 to 97. Issued January 1, 2019 99 - 1 CUSTOMS TARIFF - SCHEDULE Tariff Unit of MFN Applicable SS Description of Goods Item Meas. Tariff Preferential Tariffs 9901.00.00 Articles and materials for use in the manufacture or repair of the Free CCCT, LDCT, GPT, UST, following to be employed in commercial fishing or the commercial MT, MUST, CIAT, CT, harvesting of marine plants: CRT, IT, NT, SLT, PT, COLT, JT, PAT, HNT, Artificial bait; KRT, CEUT, UAT, CPTPT: Free Carapace measures; Cordage, fishing lines (including marlines), rope and twine, of a circumference not exceeding 38 mm; Devices for keeping nets open; Fish hooks; Fishing nets and netting; Jiggers; Line floats; Lobster traps; Lures; Marker buoys of any material excluding wood; Net floats; Scallop drag nets; Spat collectors and collector holders; Swivels.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of High-Altitude Hypoxia on the Transcription of CYP450 and UGT1A1 Mediated by PXR and CAR
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 September 2020 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.574176 Regulation of High-Altitude Hypoxia on the Transcription of CYP450 and UGT1A1 Mediated by PXR and CAR † † Ya-bin Duan 1,2 , Jun-bo Zhu 1,2 , Jian-xin Yang 2, Gui-qin Liu 3, Xue Bai 1, Ning Qu 4*, Xue-jun Wang 5* and Xiang-yang Li 2* Edited by: 1 Research Center for High Altitude Medicine, Qinghai University Medical College, Xining, China, 2 State Key Laboratory of Yurong Lai, Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining, China, 3 College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai Gilead, United States University, Xining, China, 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Qinghai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xining, China, 5 Reviewed by: Department of Anesthesiology, Red Cross Hospital of Qinghai, Xining, China Cindy Yanfei Li, Amgen, United States Little is known about what roles the pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive Xavier Decleves, Universite´ Paris Descartes, France androstane receptor (CAR) play in drug metabolism in high-altitude hypoxia. Likewise, *Correspondence: the potential interaction of nuclear receptors and drug metabolism enzymes during drug Ning Qu metabolism of high-altitude hypoxia is not fully understood. In this work, we investigated [email protected] Xue-jun Wang the effects of high-altitude hypoxia on transcriptional regulation of cytochrome P450 [email protected] (CYP450) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) genes mediated by PXR and Xiang-yang Li CAR proteins. The protein and mRNA expressions of CYP450, UGT1A1, PXR, and CAR [email protected] were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and qPCR in rats and HepG2 †These authors share first authorship cell lines under hypoxia.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions
    CIOMS ORGANIZATIONS1949 OF MEDICAL SCIENCES COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL REPORTING ADVERSE 1999 REPORTING ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS DRUG ADVERSE REPORTING DRUG REACTIONS DEFINITIONS OF TERMS AND CRITERIA FOR THEIR USE DEFINITIONS OF TERMS AND CRITERIA FOR THEIR USE TERMS AND CRITERIA FOR DEFINITIONS OF CIOMS publications may be obtained direct from CIOMS, c/o World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. They are also distributed by the World Health Organization, Distribution and Sales Unit, Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland and are available from booksellers through the network of WHO sales agents. A list of these agents may be obtained by writing to the above address. Price: SF 35.-- (including CD-ROM) REPORTING ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS Definitions of Terms and Criteria for their Use Geneva Book and CD--Rom Copyright # 1999 by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) ISBN 92 9036 071 2 Printed in Switzerland Reprinted 2000 EDITORIAL GROUP Z. Bankowski R. Bruppacher I. Crusius J. Gallagher G. Kremer J. Venulet The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) is a nongovernmental organization established jointly by the World Health Organization and UNESCO in 1949, with a mandate to collaborate with the United Nations and its specialized agencies. Its international membership, consisting of international unions and federations of national associations and societies, represents a substantial proportion of the world’s biomedical scientific community. Its secretariat is located in Geneva in offices made available by the World Health Organization. A dominant theme of CIOMS for some time has been the ethical aspects of biomedical technology and the bioethical considerations to be taken into account in determining and implementing health policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting
    P T Chapter 40 Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Lee B. Murdaugh, RPh, PhD The Conditions of Participation standards of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the standards of accrediting organizations such as The Joint Commission, the Healthcare Facilities Accredi- tation Program (HFAP), and the National Integrated Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations (NIAHOSM) require hospitals to identify and report adverse drug reactions (ADRs). These ADRs must be reported to LEARNING OBJECTIVES patients’ attending physicians and the hospital’s quality assessment and performance improvement program. Additionally, hospitals are expected to report serious • Define an adverse drug reaction. ADRs (as defined by the Food and Drug Administration • Discuss the detection of adverse [FDA]) to the FDA’s MedWatch program and ADRs to vaccines to the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting drug reactions. System (VAERS). • Discuss the assessment of adverse drug reactions. Defining Adverse Drug Reactions To recognize and assess ADRs, there must be a defini- tion of what constitutes an ADR. Examples of commonly used definitions are discussed in the following text. The FDA defines a serious adverse reaction as one in which “the patient outcome is death, life threat- ening (real risk of dying), hospitalization (initial or prolonged), disability (significant, persistent, or perma- nent), congenital anomaly, or required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage.”1 The American Society of Health-System Pharma- cists (ASHP) defines a ADR as “any unexpected, unin- tended, undesired, or excessive response to a drug that • requires discontinuing the drug (therapeutic or diagnostic) • requires changing the drug therapy • requires modifying the dose (except for minor dosage adjustments) • necessitates admission to a hospital 546 Competence Assessment Tools for Health-System Pharmacies • prolongs stay in a healthcare facility routine observation and assessment.
    [Show full text]