DOCSLIB.ORG

Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88209-5 - The Roman Revolution of Constantine Raymond Van Dam Index More information Index iii Ablabius, Flavius (consul), 121n, 152–55, 198, Ammianus Marcellinus (historian), 39n, 60 369–72 Amorium, 156–57, 208–9 Abraham (patriarch), 295, 301 Ampelius, Publius (prefect), 212 Acacius (count), 301n Amphilochius (bishop of Iconium), 347n Acesius (bishop), 182 Amun, 241 Achaea, 187, 212, 214 Anastasia (half-sister of Constantine), 107n, Actium, 55n 110n, 175n Adam, 255 Anatolius (prefect in 340s), 212 adnotatio, 152–54 Anatolius (prefect in 350s), 212 Adonis, flowerbeds of, 2 Ancyra,157, 166n, 170, 176, 196–97, 201–3, Adriatic Sea, 43, 54, 71, 249 209, 287–88. See also Basil (bishop of Aegean Sea, 36, 358 Ancyra); Marcellus Aelia Capitolina, 296, 300 Andrew (apostle), 315, 338 Aeneas, 8 Antaradus, 113–14 Aetius (heresiarch), 270n, 361n Antioch (in Pisidia), 187 Aezani, 188 Antioch (in Syria), 23, 136, 137n, 188–89, Africa, 7n, 20, 33, 35–38, 51, 135, 146, 212, 197n, 211–14, 319, 328; emperors at, 1, 263–65, 307 113, 116, 164–68, 171, 196, 200, 207, Afyon Karahisar: see Akroenos 245n, 343, 358–60; councils at, 38, 150, Agamemnon (king), 354 176, 257n, 258, 278, 280, 287. See also Agnes (saint): see Church of St. Agnes Eustathius; Euzoius; Flacillus; Akroenos, 220 Flavianus Alamans, 37, 74n, 270 Antoni(n)opolis, 113n, Alaric (king of Visigoths), 76–77 Antoninus Pius (emperor), 24 Albano, 34 Antonius, Marcus, 151 Alexander (bishop of Alexandria), 151n, Antony (ascetic), 119n, 318–29, 341–43. See 256–78, 285n, 286–87, 322, 333, 361 also Athanasius Alexander (bishop, perhaps of Thessalonica), Anullinus (governor), 264n 262n Apennine Mountains, 53 Alexander the Great, 16, 39, 161, 244, 311 Aphaca, 206 Alexandria, 23, 140n, 256–57, 272, 321, 324, Aphrodisias, 154n, 190, 203 329, 338n. See also Alexander (bishop of Aphrodite, 206, 299 Alexandria); Arius; Athanasius; Aphrodite Aphakitis, 206n Georgius Aphrodito, 320n Alps, 36, 54, 64, 349 Apollo, 30, 31n, 85, 89n, 101n, 171, 202n Alta Semita, 95n Apollonius (sage), 186, 214n Amazons, 62 Apronianus, L. Turcius (prefect), 56n Ambrose (bishop of Milan), 347–52 Apulia, 28n Amida, 113 Aqua Viva, 55n 427 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88209-5 - The Roman Revolution of Constantine Raymond Van Dam Index More information 428 index Aquileia, 54n, 61n, 71, 74n, 101, 117n, 329, Augst: see Colonia Augusta Raurica 349 Augustan History, 98, 104n Arabia, 67 Augusteum (at Constantinople), 306 Aradus, 113 Augustine (bishop of Hippo), 126–27, 185 Aramaic, 213 Augustus (emperor), 3–10, 18, 55n, 66, 96, Arbogast (general), 64, 348–49 151, 224n, 231, 306; and Italy, 23–24, Arborius (teacher), 116n 53–54, 56n, 115; as model, 27–28, Arcadius (emperor), 105, 214, 346–47 48–49, 88, 123–24, 148, 309, 350. See also Arch of Constantine (at Rome), 28n, 30, Syme, Ronald; Zanker, Paul 37n, 38, 42, 46–49, 88, 96–97, 134n, 222 Aurelian (emperor) 17n, 25n, 26n, 40, 186, Arch of Domitian (at Rome), 38n, 55n 232 Arch of Titus (at Rome), 96 Aurelius, as imperial name, 91 Arcus Novus (at Rome), 42n Aurelius Antoninus, C. Matrinius, 117n Ares, 281 Aurelius Marcus, 157–58 Arian Christianity (Arianism), controversy Aurelius Victor (historian), 90 over, 10, 252–82, 286–93, 310–13, 321, Auruncius Theodotus, M. Sempronius,168n 324–29, 334; in representation of Ausonius (consul), 71, 105n, 356 emperor, 15, 256, 343–51. See also Arius; Autun, 35, 112, 139 Nicene Christianity Avdan: see Marlakkou Kome Aristotle (philosopher), 214n Avitus (emperor), 68 Arius (priest), 20, 129, 151n, 252–81, 285n, 286–87, 307, 333, 336–38, 341, 361. See Baal, 295 also Arian Christianity Baalbek, 206n Arles, 64–70, 100n, 101, 112, 263; as “little Babylon, 293–94 Gallic Rome,” 67–68 Baghlija, 157n Armenia, 36, 121n Balanea, 278n Armentarius, as name for Galerius, 44n Balkan Mountains, 23, 38–47, 51–54, 57, 63, Arsaces (king of Armenia), 121n 71, 75, 78, 115–16, 144, 169, 186, 194, 200, Artemisia, 107n 205–7, 211, 273, 343, 358 Arycanda, 166 Basil (bishop of Ancyra), 293 Asclepius, 361 Basil (bishop of Caesarea), 166, 191, 316n Asia Minor, 36–38, 149–51, 156–57, 162, Basil I (emperor), 124n 165–72, 176–80, 196, 200–12, 217–20, Basilica Constantiniana, as name for Church 286–87, 356–58 of St. John Lateran, 85–88; as name for Asia, 51; province of, 160, 208, 214 Basilica Nova, 86–88, 133 Asiana (diocese), 153n, 200, 209 Basilica Nova (at Rome), 48, 82, 86–89, 91n, Asterius, 270 96, 133 Asticus, Fulvius (governor), 188n Basilina (mother of Julian), 173n Athanasius (bishop of Alexandria), 6, 14n, Bassianus (brother-in-law of Constantine), 74n, 192n, 257, 275–76, 288, 333–37, 107n, 110n, 174–75 344; and Life of Antony, 317–29, 342–43 Batavia, 35 Athens, 74n, 95, 161–62, 214 Baths of Caracalla (at Rome), 80 Atlantic Ocean, 67, 237 Baths of Diocletian (at Rome), 79–80, 247n Attalus, Priscus (emperor), 77, 136 Baths of Titus (at Rome), 96 Attis, 33n Batnae, 202n © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88209-5 - The Roman Revolution of Constantine Raymond Van Dam Index More information index 429 Bay of Naples, 71 Celsus (vicar), 264n Beirut, 189–92, 207n, 212, 215, 273, 295 Celts, 37, 73n “Belgian Rome,” 51–52, 78 Centcelles, 61n Bethelea, 114n Cerealis, Neratius (consul), 74n Bethlehem, 297, 303–4, 307 Chalcedon, 33, 317; council of, 78n, 352–53 Bithynia, 113n, 170, 194, 228, 257 Chaldaean empire, 293 Bolsena: see Volsinii Charito, 107n Bonitus (king of Franks), 37 Charlemagne (king of Franks), 72 Bordeaux, 298 Chi-Rho (monogram), 128n Bosphorus, 315 Childeric (king of Franks), 69n Brescia, 54, 73n Christianity, and historical interpretation, Britain, 35–38, 66–67, 83, 116, 124, 237 9–18, 265–69, 357–62; and persecutions, Buccelen (general), 72n 146, 163–72, 182, 223–25. See also Arian Byblus, 207n Christianity; Donatism; Gnosticism; Byzantine empire, 215–16 God; Jesus Christ; Monophysitism; Byzantium, 40, 57, 150, 186n. See also Montanism; Nicene Christianity Constantinople Christoupolis, 308 Byzas, 123 Chromatius (bishop of Aquileia), 330n Church of Hagia Sophia (at Caecilianus (bishop of Carthage), 263–64 Constantinople), 306 Caesarea (in Cappadocia), 166, 170 Church of St. Agnes (at Rome), 59–60, 114n Caesarea (in Palestine), 14, 146n, 164, 192, Church of St. John Lateran (at Rome),85–88 276n, 295–96. See also Eusebius of Church of St. Marcellinus and St. Peter (at Caesarea; Palestine Rome), 58–59, 86n Caesarea Philippi, 207, 295 Church of St. Peter (at Rome), 62n, 76n, Calder, William, 219 78n, 131–33, 221–23 Callinicum, 347 Church of the Ascension (at Mount of Campania, 71, 132 Olives), 303 Campidoglio, 134, 139–40 Church of the Holy Apostles (at Campus Martius, 43n Constantinople), as imperial tomb, Canusium, 28n 60–61, 315, 338–42 Capitoline Hill, 40–42, 95, 98, 132–34, 139, Church of the Holy Sepulcher (at 296, 299–300 Jerusalem), 292, 297–99, 307, 309–10, Cappadocia, 166, 169, 180, 212, 219, 346, 341–42. See also Martyrium 357 Church of the Nativity (at Bethlehem), Capua, 34; as “second Rome,” 70–71 303 Caracalla (emperor), 26n, 91 Cilicia, 317 Carausius (emperor), 237 Circus Maximus, 62, 86, 133n Caria, 160, 168, 190, 203, 208 Cirta, 33, 112 Carinus (emperor), 41, 228 Cisalpine Gaul, 71–72 Carnuntum, 85n, 104n Claudian (poet), 76 Carolingians, 72n Claudius Gothicus (emperor), 84–85, Carthage, 33n, 36–37, 107n. See also 98–100, 112, 117, 125, 126n Caecilianus Clermont, 72 Cataphrygians, 183n Clitumnus River, 24 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88209-5 - The Roman Revolution of Constantine Raymond Van Dam Index More information 430 index Clopas, 304n 351–53; victory over Maxentius, 15, 30, Colbasa, 166 37, 45–47, 55n, 61, 85–88, 93, 97, 135–36, Colonia Augusta Raurica, 73n, 74n 169, 172, 224–25, 263, 300, 311, 323, Colossae, 249 332–33; victory over Licinius, 15–16, 31, Colosseum, 51, 82, 96 38, 51, 99–102, 110n, 148, 150, 161, Commodus (emperor), 89n, 105, 108, 157, 172–76, 194, 197n, 222n, 232n, 247, 257, 159n, 218 264, 272–75, 280, 300, 305, 308, 331, 369 Consentius (envoy), 215 — monuments: colossal statue at Rome, Constans (emperor and son of Constantine), 86–89, 133–41; statue at Constantinople, 15, 31, 37n, 50, 56n, 60, 100, 107n, 125n, 308; statue at Volsinii, 27–28. See also 161n; in Italy, 73–74, 115–21, 222–23, Arch of Constantine; Church of the 363–64 Holy Apostles Constans (son of Constantine III), 124–25 — religion: and Apollo, 85; and Hercules, Constantia (half-sister of Constantine and 84, 233; and Sol, 38, 47n, 85, 90n, 178; wife of Licinius), 100, 110n, 114, 120, and Tetrarchic theology, 248–51; and 175, 273 Christian theological controversies, 257, Constantia, as name for city, 113n. See also 262–65; at council of Nicaea, 20, Antaradus; Antioch; Antoni(n)opolis; 140–41, 194, 270–74, 281, 297, 345; and Coutances; Maiuma; Salamis Holy Land, 293–305. See also Palestine Constantina (daughter of Constantine), — wives and children: see Constans; 59–60, 107n, 114n, 121 Constantina; Constantine II; Constantina, as name for city: see Antaradus; Constantius II; Crispus; Fausta; Helena Arles; Cirta; Coutances; (daughter); Minervina Maximianopolis — relatives: see Anastasia; Bassianus; Constantine (emperor), 71, 241, 247; Claudius Gothicus; Constantia; boyhood of, 12n, 15; in Gaul, 37–38, 62, Constantius I; Constantius, Flavius; 83–85; as hairdresser, 2, 17–18; and Constantius, Julius; Dalmatius; diadem, 16–18; and Augustus, 5–6, Dalmatius, Flavius; Eutropia 27–28, 48–49, 88, 148; and Marcus (half-sister); Eutropia (mother-in-law); Aurelius, 2, 30, 88; and Claudius Gallus; Hannibalianus; Hannibalianus Gothicus, 84–85, 98–100; identity of, the Younger; Helena (mother); Julian 13–15, 148, 223–27; names and titles of, (emperor); Licinius; Maxentius; 92–96; at Rome, 30–31, 39–40, 45–57, Maximian; Nepotianus, Julius; 80–81, 85–88, 110n, 128, 134–38, 313, 364; Theodora.
Recommended publications
  • WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP of the GODS COULD SAVE the ROMAN EMPIRE from CHAOS a Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of

    WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP of the GODS COULD SAVE the ROMAN EMPIRE from CHAOS a Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of

    WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP OF THE GODS COULD SAVE THE ROMAN EMPIRE FROM CHAOS A Thesis Presented to the faculty of the Department of Humanities and Religious Studies California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Humanities by Alejandra Meléndez-Silva SPRING 2020 WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP OF THE GODS COULD SAVE THE ROMAN EMPIRE FROM CHAOS A Thesis by Alejandra Meléndez-Silva Approved by: _________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Jeffrey Brodd _________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Bradley Nystrom __________________ Date ii Student: Alejandra Meléndez-Silva I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and this thesis is suitable for electronic submission to the library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. ___________________________, Graduate Coordinator _____________________ Dr. Harvey Stark Date Department of Humanities and Religious Studies iii Abstract of WHY JULIAN BELIEVED CORRECT WORSHIP OF THE GODS COULD SAVE THE ROMAN EMPIRE FROM CHAOS by Alejandra Meléndez-Silva The Roman emperor Julian is famously remembered for being Rome’s last pagan emperor and he has been vilified for his dislike of Christianity. Sufficient analysis of Julian’s own perspective reveals a complex individual who does not conform with the simplified caricature of Julian “the Apostate” who was focused on assailing Christianity. His aversion to the Christians was mainly motivated by the fact that they refused to participate in the state cult. This thesis will explore the relationship between properly honoring the gods and state health, its origins, and why it was essential to sacrifice to the gods.
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
  • Applying Satellite Data Sources in the Documentation and Landscape Modelling for Graeco-Roman/Byzantine Fortified Sites in the Tūr Abdin Area, Eastern Turkey

    Applying Satellite Data Sources in the Documentation and Landscape Modelling for Graeco-Roman/Byzantine Fortified Sites in the Tūr Abdin Area, Eastern Turkey

    ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume IV-2/W2, 2017 26th International CIPA Symposium 2017, 28 August–01 September 2017, Ottawa, Canada APPLYING SATELLITE DATA SOURCES IN THE DOCUMENTATION AND LANDSCAPE MODELLING FOR GRAECO-ROMAN/BYZANTINE FORTIFIED SITES IN THE TŪR ABDIN AREA, EASTERN TURKEY Kenneth Silvera *, Minna Silverb, Markus Törmä c, Jari Okkonend, Tuula Okkonene a Principal Investigator, Dr., The Institute for Digital Archaeology, Oxford, UK, [email protected] bAdj. Prof., Oulu University, Finland, [email protected], c Techn. Lic., Aalto University, Finland, [email protected] d Dr. Oulu University, Finland, [email protected] , e Dr. Oulu University, Finland, [email protected] Commission II KEY WORDS: Remote sensing, satellite images, GeoEye-1, Roman limes studies, Byzantine studies, archaeological survey, GIS ABSTRACT: In 2015-2016 the Finnish-Swedish Archaeological Project in Mesopotamia (FSAPM) initiated a pilot study of an unexplored area in the Tūr Abdin region in Northern Mesopotamia (present-day Mardin Province in southeastern Turkey). FSAPM is reliant on satellite image data sources for prospecting, identifying, recording, and mapping largely unknown archaeological sites as well as studying their landscapes in the region. The purpose is to record and document sites in this endangered area for saving its cultural heritage. The sites in question consist of fortified architectural remains in an ancient border zone between the Graeco-Roman/Byzantine world and Parthia/Persia. The location of the archaeological sites in the terrain and the visible archaeological remains, as well as their dimensions and sizes were determined from the ortorectified satellite images, which also provided coordinates.
  • The Exiled Bishops of Constantinople from the Fourth to the Late Sixth Century

    The Exiled Bishops of Constantinople from the Fourth to the Late Sixth Century

    Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 231–247 ISSN: 2084-140X DOI: 10.18778/2084-140X.05.07 e-ISSN: 2449-8378 Rafał Kosiński (Białystok) The Exiled Bishops of Constantinople from the Fourth to the Late Sixth Century he existence of quick and efficient communication with the provincial territo- Tries was a matter of vital importance to Late-Antique Constantinople, the cap- ital city and the administrative centre of the Eastern Roman Empire. As a result, it became necessary to ensure the creation and maintenance of the land and sea routes linking the City with the provinces. The present article aims to examine which of those links, specifically by land or sea, facilitated a more rapid and conve- nient communication between the capital city and the more or less distant regions of the Empire, as exemplified by the various places of exile connected with the deposed bishops of Constantinople. Assuming that one of the key goals of sending someone into banishment would be to prevent them, as much as possible, from having any form of communication with the City, the location of the places to which they had been confined by the order of the authorities could indicate which method of contact would have potentially made it easier, or more difficult, for an exiled bishop to communicate with his followers at the capital1. In the early Byzantine period, the office of the Bishop of Constantinople was not a very secure position. Considering the time frame from the consecration of the City until the end of the sixth century, as many as 11 metropolitan bish- ops, in effect every third one, had been deposed from their office.
  • John Chrysostom and the Transformation of the City. by Aideen M

    John Chrysostom and the Transformation of the City. by Aideen M

    98 JOURNAL OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY membership, as defined by Athanasius, shifted over time and according to his polemical purposes, enabling him to present all his opponents from the 330s to the late 350s as representatives of a single heretical party. Gwynn then analyses whether the actions of those whom Athanasius calls ‘the Eusebians’ provide any evidence for a unified political agenda of a single ecclesiastical party against Athanasius and his ‘orthodox’ supporters. Given the fragmentary non-Athanasian evidence for many of these activities, the results here are largely inconclusive. In the last, and longest, chapter, Gwynn determines whether ‘the Eusebians’ subscribed to ‘Arian’ theology. He first defines what he calls ‘Athanasian Arianism,’ that is, how Athanasius himself presented the theological views of Arius and his supporters. Gwynn then compares this theological construct to the known views of specific ‘Eusebians’, Arius, Asterius, Eusebius of Nicomedia, as well as to the Second Creed of the Dedication Council of Antioch in 341, maintaining that neither these ‘Eusebians’ nor the creed reflects an ‘Athanasian Arian’ theology. Gwynn then concludes that the ‘Eusebians’ did not exist as a distinct ecclesiastical party except in the polemic of Athanasius and that the monolithic ‘Arianism’ imputed to them by Athanasius does not do justice to their distinctive theologies. This is not to deny that the so-called ‘Eusebians’ shared political and theological concerns; it is to realise that Athanasius’ polemic distorts the reality. Gwynn’s monograph notes but does not address why Athanasius’s polemical construct found widespread acceptance. EMORY UNIVERSITY MARK DELCOGLIANO John Chrysostom and the transformation of the city.
  • Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C

    Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C

    ROMAN-BARBARIAN MARRIAGES IN THE LATE EMPIRE R.C. Blockley In 1964 Rosario Soraci published a study of conubia between Romans and Germans from the fourth to the sixth century A.D.1 Although the title of the work might suggest that its concern was to be with such marriages through- out the period, in fact its aim was much more restricted. Beginning with a law issued by Valentinian I in 370 or 373 to the magister equitum Theodosius (C.Th. 3.14.1), which banned on pain of death all marriages between Roman pro- vincials and barbarae or gentiles, Soraci, after assessing the context and intent of the law, proceeded to discuss its influence upon the practices of the Germanic kingdoms which succeeded the Roman Empire in the West. The text of the law reads: Nulli provineialium, cuiuscumque ordinis aut loci fuerit, cum bar- bara sit uxore coniugium, nec ulli gentilium provinciales femina copuletur. Quod si quae inter provinciales atque gentiles adfinitates ex huiusmodi nuptiis extiterit, quod in his suspectum vel noxium detegitur, capitaliter expietur. This was regarded by Soraci not as a general banning law but rather as a lim- ited attempt, in the context of current hostilities with the Alamanni, to keep those barbarians serving the Empire (gentiles)isolated from the general Roman 2 populace. The German lawmakers, however, exemplified by Alaric in his 63 64 interpretatio,3 took it as a general banning law and applied it in this spir- it, so that it became the basis for the prohibition under the Germanic king- doms of intermarriage between Romans and Germans.
  • The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity

    The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Tim W. Watson June 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michele R. Salzman, Chairperson Dr. Harold A. Drake Dr. Thomas N. Sizgorich Copyright by Tim W. Watson 2010 The Dissertation of Tim W. Watson is approved: ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In accordance with that filial piety so central to the epistolary persona of Q. Aurelius Symmachus, I would like to thank first and foremost my parents, Lee and Virginia Watson, without whom there would be quite literally nothing, followed closely by my grandmother, Virginia Galbraith, whose support both emotionally and financially has been invaluable. Within the academy, my greatest debt is naturally to my advisor, Michele Salzman, a doctissima patrona of infinite patience and firm guidance, to whom I came with the mind of a child and departed with the intellect of an adult. Hal Drake I owe for his kind words, his critical eye, and his welcome humor. In Tom Sizgorich I found a friend and colleague whose friendship did not diminish even after he assumed his additional role as mentor. Outside the field, I owe a special debt to Dale Kent, who ushered me through my beginning quarter of graduate school with great encouragement and first stirred my fascination with patronage. Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude to the two organizations who have funded the years of my study, the Department of History at the University of California, Riverside and the Department of Classics at the University of California, Irvine.
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny

    The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny

    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
  • OLBA XXIII (Ayrıbasım / Offprint)

    OLBA XXIII (Ayrıbasım / Offprint)

    ISSN 1301 7667 MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ KILIKIA ARKEOLOJİSİNİ ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ MERSIN UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH CENTER OF CILICIAN ARCHAEOLOGY KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA XXIII (Ayrıbasım / Offprint) MERSİN 2015 KAAM YAYINLARI OLBA XXIII © 2015 Mersin Üniversitesi/Türkiye ISSN 1301 7667 Yayıncı Sertifika No: 14641 OLBA dergisi; ARTS & HUMANITIES CITATION INDEX, EBSCO, PROQUEST ve TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanlarında taranmaktadır. Alman Arkeoloji Enstitüsü’nün (DAI) Kısaltmalar Dizini’nde ‘OLBA’ şeklinde yer almaktadır. OLBA dergsi hakemlidir. Makalelerdeki görüş, düşünce ve bilimsel değerlendirmelerin yasal sorumluluğu yazarlara aittir. The articles are evaluated by referees. The legal responsibility of the ideas, opinions and scientific evaluations are carried by the author. OLBA dergisi, Mayıs ayında olmak üzere, yılda bir kez basılmaktadır. Published each year in May. KAAM’ın izni olmadan OLBA’nın hiçbir bölümü kopya edilemez. Alıntı yapılması durumunda dipnot ile referans gösterilmelidir. It is not allowed to copy any section of OLBA without the permit of KAAM. OLBA dergisinde makalesi yayımlanan her yazar, makalesinin baskı olarak ve elektronik ortamda yayımlanmasını kabul etmiş ve telif haklarını OLBA dergisine devretmiş sayılır. Each author whose article is published in OLBA shall be considered to have accepted the article to be published in print version and electronically and thus have transferred the copyrights to the journal OLBA.. OLBA’ya gönderilen makaleler aşağıdaki web adresinde ve bu cildin giriş sayfalarında belirtilen formatlara uygun olduğu taktirde basılacaktır. Articles should be written according the formats mentioned in the following web address. Redaktion: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Deniz Kaplan OLBA’nın yeni sayılarında yayınlanması istenen makaleler için yazışma adresi: Correspondance addresses for sending articles to following volumes of OLBA: Prof.
  • The North American Patristics Society

    The North American Patristics Society

    NORTH AMERICAN PATRISTICS SOCIETY ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM May 21-23, 2009 Holiday Inn Mart Plaza Chicago, Illinois North American Patristics Society Past Presidents of the Society Officers of the Society o 1972 Bruce M. Metzger (†) o 1973 Robert D. Sider Paul M. Blowers, President o 1974 Maurice Cunningham (†) Virginia Burrus, Vice President o 1975 Robert M. Grant Brian Matz, Secretary-Treasurer o 1976 William R. Schoedel o 1977 Joseph M.-F. Marique, S.J. (†) o 1978 John Meyendorff (†) Other Elected Members of the Board of Directors o 1979 Thomas P. Halton Christopher Beeley o 1980/81 William R. Schoedel Jeffrey Bingham o 1981-83 Dennis E. Groh Elizabeth Digeser o 1983-85 David Balás, O.Cist. Blake Leyerle o 1985/86 Robert L. Wilken David G. Hunter (Immediate Past President) o 1986-88 Sidney H. Griffith o 1988/89 Elizabeth Clark o 1989/90 Charles Kannengiesser Nominations Committee o 1990-92 Everett Ferguson o 1992/93 J. Patout Burns Kate Cooper, Chair o 1993/94 Frederick W. Norris Richard Layton o 1994-96 Joseph F. Kelly William Harmless o 1996/97 Patricia Cox Miller o 1997/98 Brian E. Daley, S.J. o 1998-2000 Susan Ashbrook Harvey Journal of Early Christian Studies o 2000/01 Joseph T. Lienhard, S.J. David Brakke, Editor o 2001/02 J. Rebecca Lyman Bradley Storin, Editorial Assistant o 2002-04 William Tabbernee Richard Layton, Book Review Editor o 2004/05 James E. Goehring o 2005/06 Maureen A. Tilley o 2006-08 David G. Hunter Patristic Monograph Series, Catholic University of America Press o 2008/09 Paul M.
  • Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa

    Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa

    Durham E-Theses Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Neamµu, Mihail G. How to cite: Neamµu, Mihail G. (2002) Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4187/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk University of Durham Faculty of Arts Department of Theology The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Mihail G. Neamtu St John's College September 2002 M.A. in Theological Research Supervisor: Prof Andrew Louth This dissertation is the product of my own work, and the work of others has been properly acknowledged throughout. Mihail Neamtu Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa MA (Research) Thesis, September 2002 Abstract This MA thesis focuses on the work of one of the most influential and authoritative theologians of the early Church: St Gregory of Nyssa (f396).
  • CHAPTER 4 the CHURCH in the THIRD CENTURY Roman

    CHAPTER 4 the CHURCH in the THIRD CENTURY Roman

    The Early Church Christopher K. Lensch, S.T.M. Western Reformed Seminary (www.wrs.edu) CHAPTER 4 THE CHURCH IN THE THIRD CENTURY Roman emperors in the first half of the century Severi dynasty 1. Septimius Severus (193-211) [already discussed under second century] renewed persecution in AD 200: Leonidas (Origen’s father) beheaded Potamiaena (young girl) boiled in oil Petpetua and baby burned; her slave Felicitas killed also died on campaign in Britain 2. Caracalla (211-217) brutal and cruel; murdered family members, including brother Geta; favored the army; built baths; extended Roman citizenship to all, in order to tax all; dropped persecution in middle of reign; was assassinated by his army on a Parthian campaign 3. Macrinus (217-218) prefect of the guard; removed by Caracalla’s cousin and his family 4. Heliogabalus (218-222) cousin of Caracalla, controlled by his mother Soaemias and grandmother Maesa (Caracalla’s aunt); real name was Elagabalus; Latin authors name Heliogabalus 14-year old priest of Syrian sun god; brought Syrian “Baal” (conical black stone) to Rome; unbelievable sexual depravity; grandmother convinced him to adopt cousin Alexander; slain by Guard 5. Alexander Severus (222-235) 4.1 14 years old; well trained and prepared; ruled by mother; temperate and modest, opposite of Heliogabalus; private chapel icons: Jupiter, Orpheus, Apollonius, Abraham, Christ; *put golden rule in house and many public buildings; very efficient administrator, lowered taxes; weak against Germans, bribed them; assassinated in tent by army, under Maximinus Anarchy; army control 6. Maximinus (235-238) huge soldier (they say 8 feet tall); hated culture and education; never entered Rome; confiscated property of upper classes; murdered by soldiers he punished 7.