DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Regional Vulnerability Assessment: Riverina Murray

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Integrated Regional Vulnerability Assessment: Riverina Murray Volume 1: Regional vulnerabilities i © State of NSW, Office of Environment and Heritage. The Office of Environment and Heritage and the State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced, for educational or non-commercial use, in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of images. Disclaimer: The Office of Environment and Heritage NSW (OEH) has compiled this document in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. OEH does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South NSW 1232 Report pollution and environmental incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or [email protected] See also www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (information & publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 1 74359 742 2 OEH 2014/0635 August 2014 ii Integrated Regional Vulnerability Assessment: Riverina Murray CONTENTS List of Figures .....................................................................................................................iv Preface .................................................................................................................................vi 1 How the IRVA overcomes the challenges of planning for climate change .............. 1 1.1 Why do we need an Integrated Regional Vulnerability Assessment? ......................... 1 1.2 What is an IRVA?........................................................................................................ 1 1.3 The Riverina Murray Region of NSW ........................................................................ 2 2 Riverina Murray IRVA .................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Process ......................................................................................................................... 4 3 Climate change impacts in the Riverina Murray ........................................................ 6 4 Vulnerability in the Riverina Murray ........................................................................... 8 4.1 Water Resources .......................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Landscape function .................................................................................................... 14 4.3 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 17 4.4 Demographic change ................................................................................................. 20 4.5 Sustainability of local government ............................................................................ 24 4.6 Skills, knowledge, training and capacity ................................................................... 25 4.7 Regional networks ..................................................................................................... 28 4.8 Funding models ......................................................................................................... 31 5 Riverina Murray regional context ..............................................................................32 5.1 Topography and land use ........................................................................................... 32 5.2 Climate and hydrology .............................................................................................. 34 5.3 Population and demographics .................................................................................... 35 5.4 Regional economy ..................................................................................................... 37 5.5 Infrastructure and Emergency services .......................................................................... 40 6 Climate change projections & biophysical impacts for Riverina Murray Region ...41 Appendix A: Agencies and organisations represented at the sector workshops .........43 References ..........................................................................................................................45 Integrated Regional Vulnerability Assessment: Riverina Murray iii List of Figures Figure 1 Vulnerability model – integration of impacts and adaptive capacity for multiple sectors ..................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 The Riverina Murray region of NSW ........................................................................ 3 Figure 3 Overview of the Riverina Murray NSW IRVA process .............................................. 4 Figure 4 Workshop sectors for Riverina Murray IRVA............................................................ 5 Figure 5 Projected changes to rainfall in the Riverina Murray in 2050 ................................... 7 Figure 6 Water vulnerability issue summary .........................................................................10 Figure 7 Summary of high level climate change impacts on landscapes and ecosystems identified in IRVA workshops ..................................................................................16 Figure 8 Riverina-Murray Age Profile ....................................................................................21 Figure 9 Migration flows within Riverina cities ......................................................................21 Figure 10 Land use in the Riverina Murray Region ...............................................................33 Figure 11 Riverina Murray Population Growth ......................................................................35 Figure 12 Riverina-Murray Age Profile ..................................................................................36 Figure 13 Riverina/Murray Unemployment Rate 1996-2006 .................................................37 Figure 14 Industry Structure of the Riverina Murray Region 2005-06 ...................................38 Figure 15 Annual income and jobs from irrigated agriculture in the Murrumbidgee ...............39 iv Integrated Regional Vulnerability Assessment: Riverina Murray Glossary Adaptation Action taken to avoid actual or anticipated impacts from climate change, or to attain potential benefits arising from climate change. (IPCC, 2007a). Adaptive The emergent property of a system to adjust its characteristics or capacity behaviour to better cope with existing climate variability or future climate conditions. Adaptive capacity is expressed as actions that lead to adaptation that serve to enhance a system’s coping capacity and increase its coping range, thereby reducing its vulnerability to climate hazards. Adaptive capacity also refers to the set of resources available for adaptation, and the ability of a system to deploy resources effectively in pursuit of adaptation (UNDP, 2005). Climate Average weather (or, more specifically, the mean and variability of variables such as temperature, precipitation and winds) over a time period ranging from months to thousands of years to millions of years. Climate change A statistically significant variation in either the mean state of the climate or in its variability, persisting for an extended period (typically decades or longer). Climate change may be due to natural internal processes or external forcings, or to persistent anthropogenic changes in the composition of the atmosphere or in land use. Exposure The degree to which a system or sector is exposed to climate factors, including in terms of the duration, frequency, and magnitude of changes in average climate and extremes. Impacts (climate) Consequences of climate change on natural and human systems. Integration The process by which separately produced components or assessments are combined, and incongruities in their interactions are considered and addressed. Maladaptation Any changes in natural or human systems that inadvertently increase vulnerability to climate variables; an adaptation that does not succeed in reducing vulnerability, but increases it instead. Mitigation An anthropogenic intervention to reduce the sources or enhance (emissions) the sinks of greenhouse gases. Mitigation Measures to contain or reduce the severity of human and material (natural damage caused by extreme weather events and natural hazards. disasters) Region The planning regions of NSW as depicted in NSW2021 – A plan to make NSW Number 1. Resilience Amount of change a system can undergo without changing state. Sector A part or division, as of the economy (e.g. the manufacturing sector, the services sector) or the environment (e.g. water resources, forestry). Sensitivity The degree to which
Recommended publications
  • Landscape Report Template

    Landscape Report Template

    MURRAY REGION DESTINATION MANAGEMENT PLAN MURRAY REGIONAL TOURISM www.murrayregionaltourism.com.au AUTHORS Mike Ruzzene Chris Funtera Urban Enterprise Urban Planning, Land Economics, Tourism Planning & Industry Software 389 St Georges Rd, Fitzroy North, VIC 3068 (03) 9482 3888 www.urbanenterprise.com.au © Copyright, Murray Regional Tourism This work is copyright. Apart from any uses permitted under Copyright Act 1963, no part may be reproduced without written permission of Murray Regional Tourism DISCLAIMER Neither Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. nor any member or employee of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. takes responsibility in any way whatsoever to any person or organisation (other than that for which this report has been prepared) in respect of the information set out in this report, including any errors or omissions therein. In the course of our preparation of this report, projections have been prepared on the basis of assumptions and methodology which have been described in the report. It is possible that some of the assumptions underlying the projections may change. Nevertheless, the professional judgement of the members and employees of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. have been applied in making these assumptions, such that they constitute an understandable basis for estimates and projections. Beyond this, to the extent that the assumptions do not materialise, the estimates and projections of achievable results may vary. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 5.3. TOURISM PRODUCT STRENGTHS 32 1. INTRODUCTION 10 PART B. DESTINATION MANAGEMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK 34 1.1. PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES 10 6. DMP FRAMEWORK 35 1.2. THE REGION 10 6.1. OVERVIEW 35 1.3. INTEGRATION WITH DESTINATION RIVERINA MURRAY 12 7.
  • 1870 1956 1895 1944 History of Water Resources and Management in the Murray–Darling Basin 2006 1997 1880 1890 1864 1936 1902

    1870 1956 1895 1944 History of Water Resources and Management in the Murray–Darling Basin 2006 1997 1880 1890 1864 1936 1902

    Major flood in northern Severe drought leads to Highest Basin inflows in Basin and Darling River. the end of commercial recorded history navigation on the Murray (111,000 GL) cause and Darling Rivers. widespread flooding. Modelling inflows within 1914 Severe drought. 1956 1890 the Murray–Darling Hume Dam drops to 1% of capacity. Basin commences. Severe drought 1892 throughout Widespread flooding across the Basin. Flood along the Murray. 1968 HISTORY OF WATER RESOURCES NSW, Vic and Known as the ‘big wet’. Start of the ‘Federation SA. Murray Drought throughout drought’, which lasted ceased to flow AND MANAGEMENT IN THE 1917 Drought forces Adelaide to take 90% of its water from the Murray. 1974 Australia lasts for two years. 1944 for seven years. in some areas. The Murray Mouth closes for first time in recorded history. MURRAY–DARLING4 BASIN5,000 Highest recorded flood Floods across QLD, Flood in Flood 1981 in Murray system. 1895 Major flood across NSW and Victoria. 1864 the the entire Basin. Large flood on Severe Murray Beginning of longest drought in 1952 1909 and Murrumbidgee drought in 1993 Australia’s recorded history. Wimmera 1921 Flood along River inundates 1870 southern 40,000 the Murray. the town of and eastern Rivers. Murray Mouth closes and 1852 Gundagai, NSW. states 1931 requires dredging. 1997 1880 50000 lasting six Drought in NSW. years. 2000 Lowest Basin water inflows 35,000 Drought in NSW. Average, post 2000-01 on record (9,300 GL). MurrumbidgeeLon g term average, 1824 River waterholes 10,900 GL 3,980 GL Widespread flooding dry up, fish throughout the Basin.
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals

    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals

    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
  • River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir Reach Report Constraints Management Strategy

    River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir Reach Report Constraints Management Strategy

    River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir reach report Constraints Management Strategy August 2015 Hume–Yarrawonga reach report, Constraints Management Strategy Published by the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority Postal Address: GPO Box 1801, Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6279 0100 international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile: (02) 6248 8053 international + 61 2 6248 8053 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.mdba.gov.au ISBN (online): 978-1-925221-10-7 All material and work produced by the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority constitutes Commonwealth copyright. MDBA reserves the right to set out the terms and conditions for the use of such material. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, photographs, the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority logo or other logos and emblems, any material protected by a trade mark, any content provided by third parties, and where otherwise noted, all material presented in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au © Murray‒Darling Basin Authority 2015. The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any Murray‒ Darling Basin Authority material sourced from it) using the following wording within your work: Title: River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir reach report: Constraints Management Strategy. Source: Licensed from the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. As far as practicable, material for which the copyright is owned by a third party will be clearly labelled. The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that this material has been reproduced in this publication with the full consent of the copyright owners.
  • The Old Hume Highway History Begins with a Road

    The Old Hume Highway History Begins with a Road

    The Old Hume Highway History begins with a road Routes, towns and turnoffs on the Old Hume Highway RMS8104_HumeHighwayGuide_SecondEdition_2018_v3.indd 1 26/6/18 8:24 am Foreword It is part of the modern dynamic that, with They were propelled not by engineers and staggering frequency, that which was forged by bulldozers, but by a combination of the the pioneers long ago, now bears little or no needs of different communities, and the paths resemblance to what it has evolved into ... of least resistance. A case in point is the rough route established Some of these towns, like Liverpool, were by Hamilton Hume and Captain William Hovell, established in the very early colonial period, the first white explorers to travel overland from part of the initial push by the white settlers Sydney to the Victorian coast in 1824. They could into Aboriginal land. In 1830, Surveyor-General not even have conceived how that route would Major Thomas Mitchell set the line of the Great look today. Likewise for the NSW and Victorian Southern Road which was intended to tie the governments which in 1928 named a straggling rapidly expanding pastoral frontier back to collection of roads and tracks, rather optimistically, central authority. Towns along the way had mixed the “Hume Highway”. And even people living fortunes – Goulburn flourished, Berrima did in towns along the way where trucks thundered well until the railway came, and who has ever through, up until just a couple of decades ago, heard of Murrimba? Mitchell’s road was built by could only dream that the Hume could be convicts, and remains of their presence are most something entirely different.
  • NSW Regional Innovation Strategy

    NSW Regional Innovation Strategy

    = = kpt=oÉÖáçå~ä=fååçî~íáçå=píê~íÉÖóW oÉëáäáÉåí=_ìëáåÉëëÉëI=pìëí~áå~ÄäÉ=gçÄë= NSW Regional Innovation Strategy NSW Regional Innovation Strategy Executive Summary................................................................................................i 1. Introduction....................................................................................................1 1.1. Purpose of the Regional Innovation Strategy..........................................1 1.2. What is Innovation?...............................................................................2 1.3. Strategic Context...................................................................................3 1.3.1. Key Regional Statistics......................................................................................3 1.3.2. Current Regional Challenges...........................................................................4 1.3.3. Existing Government Policies...........................................................................4 1.4. Methodology.........................................................................................6 2. Main Drivers and Enablers of Innovation in Regional NSW...............................9 2.1. Drivers of Innovation: Pressure to Innovate............................................9 2.1.1. Adapting to Evolving Consumer Preferences..................................................9 2.1.2. Industry Competition......................................................................................10 2.1.3. Environmental Constraints.............................................................................11
  • Data Versus Desktop: an Assessment of the Severity of Cold Water Pollution in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers Below Khancoban Dam Pope E1 and Nolan A2

    Data Versus Desktop: an Assessment of the Severity of Cold Water Pollution in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers Below Khancoban Dam Pope E1 and Nolan A2

    Full Paper Pope and Nolan – An assessment of the severity of Cold Water Pollution below Khancoban Dam Data versus Desktop: An assessment of the severity of Cold Water Pollution in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers below Khancoban Dam Pope E1 and Nolan A2 1. Snowy Hydro Limited, Cooma NSW 2630. Email: [email protected] 2. Snowy Hydro Limited, Cooma NSW 2630. Email: [email protected] Key Points Cold Water Pollution occurs downstream of Khancoban Dam but effects are not as severe or persistent as expected on the basis of the original desktop study Summer suppression is evident but winter elevation, annual amplitude reduction, seasonal displacement and impacts to diel variation are very minor Causes of cold water releases appear to be a combination of reservoir stratification and releases from Murray 2 Power station with releases from the power station being the dominant cause The presence of Khancoban Reservoir appears to be having a minor impact on the percentage of time that breeding temperature thresholds are exceeded during the breeding seasons of a number of native fish expected to occur in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers. Abstract In 2004, Khancoban Dam was listed as one of 9 Dams in NSW considered to cause severe cold water pollution on the basis of a desktop study. This study, based on 5 years of field data, demonstrates that cold water releases do occur from Khancoban but that these events are not as severe or prolonged as expected. On average, there is a difference in temperature of only -2.2°C between monitoring points upstream and downstream of Khancoban Dam during summer.
  • NSW Food & Wine Tourism Strategy & Action Plan 2018

    NSW Food & Wine Tourism Strategy & Action Plan 2018

    New South Wales Food & Wine Tourism Strategy & Action Plan 2018 - 2022 FOREWORD The NSW Food & Wine Tourism Strategy & Action Plan 2018 - 2022 is designed to provide the food and wine sector and the tourism industry with an overview of Destination NSW’s plans to further support the development of food and wine tourism to the State. NSW attracts more domestic and international visitors than any Australian State, giving us a position of strength to leverage in growing consumer interest and participation in food and wine tourism experiences. The lifeblood of this vibrant industry sector is the passion and innovation of our producers, vignerons, chefs and restaurateurs and the influence of our multicultural population on ingredients, cooking styles and cuisine and beverage purveyors. NSW is also home to the oldest and newest wine regions in Australia, world renowned for vintages of exceptional quality. From fifth-generation, family-owned wineries to a new generation of winemakers experimenting with alternative techniques and varietals, the State’s wine industry is a key player in the tourism industry. Alongside our winemakers, a new breed of beverage makers – the brewers of craft beer and ciders and distillers of gin and other spirits – is enriching the visitor experience. The aim of this Strategy & Action Plan is to ensure NSW’s exceptional food and wine experiences become a highlight for visitors to the State. Destination NSW is grateful to the many industry stakeholders who have contributed to the development of this Strategy and Action Plan, and we look forward to working together to deliver outstanding food and wine experiences to every visitor.
  • Bank Erosion Along the River Murray Between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction with a Focus on the Impacts of Vessel Wash

    Bank Erosion Along the River Murray Between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction with a Focus on the Impacts of Vessel Wash

    Bank erosion along the River Murray between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction With a focus on the impacts of vessel wash April 2017 Bank erosion along the River Murray between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction Published by the Murray–Darling Basin Authority GPO Box 1801, Canberra ACT 2601 MDBA publication no: 09/17 02 6279 0100 ISBN (online): 978-1-925599-21-3 [email protected] © Murray–Darling Basin Authority 2017 mdba.gov.au With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the MDBA logo, trademarks and any exempt photographs and graphics (these are identified), this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any Murray‒ Darling Basin Authority material sourced from it) using the following wording within your work: Title: Bank erosion along the Murray River between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction Source: Licensed from the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence Accessibility The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority makes its documents and information available in accessible formats. On some occasions the highly technical nature of the document means that we cannot make some sections fully accessible. If you encounter accessibility problems or the document is in a format that you cannot access, please contact us. Acknowledgement of the Traditional Owners of the Murray–Darling Basin The Murray–Darling Basin Authority acknowledges and pays respect to the Traditional Owners, and their Nations, of the Murray–Darling Basin, who have a deep cultural, social, environmental, spiritual and economic connection to their lands and waters.
  • River Murray Works Nomination

    River Murray Works Nomination

    The Institution of Engineers, Australia The ENGINEERING WORKS of the RIVER MURRAY Nomination for a NATIONAL ENGINEERING LANDMARK on the Centenary of Federation 2001 Institution of Engineers, Australia September 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................. 1 2. Nomination Form ........................................................................ 2 3. History......................................................................................... 4 4. River Murray Commission ......................................................... 7 5. State Constructing Authorities .................................................... 8 6. The River Murray Works ............................................................ 9 7. Upgrading the Original Works.................................................. 11 8. Illustrations ............................................................................... 12 9. Key Personnel ........................................................................... 12 10. Changing Roles of the Works ................................................... 13 11. Assessment of Significance ...................................................... 14 12. Current Heritage Listings .......................................................... 17 13. Statement of Significance ......................................................... 17 14. Draft Citation ............................................................................ 18 15. References ................................................................................
  • Environmental Impact Statement for Traveston Crossing Dam (Mary River, Queensland): a Review with Regard for Species of Concern Under the EPBC Act 1999

    Environmental Impact Statement for Traveston Crossing Dam (Mary River, Queensland): a Review with Regard for Species of Concern Under the EPBC Act 1999

    Environmental Impact Statement for Traveston Crossing Dam (Mary River, Queensland): A Review with regard for Species of Concern under the EPBC Act 1999 Report to the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra KF Walker Consultant in River and Floodplain Ecology PO Box 331, YANKALILLA 5203 Adjunct Associate Professor School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide www.sunwater.com.au November 2008 ii … This report may be cited as: Walker KF. 2008. Environmental Impact Statement for Traveston Crossing Dam (Mary River, Queensland): A Review with regard for Species of Concern under the EPBC Act 1999. Report to the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra. November 2008. xx+84p. iii Executive Summary Queensland Water Infrastructure (QWI) proposes to construct Traveston Crossing Dam on the Mary River as part of a strategy to meet anticipated water demands in south‐ eastern Queensland. This is the last high‐yield dam site available in the region, according to QWI, but it is also an extremely sensitive site in terms of significance for conservation. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been released for public comment, and a Supplement containing responses to submissions has also been issued. This review is concerned with the implications for a number of species listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 (EPBC Act), including three ‘iconic’ species, the Australian lungfish, Mary River cod and Mary River turtle. Context Ecologically Sustainable Development In many cases, the EIS makes assumptions on the basis of scant evidence and draws conclusions about impacts with little or no justification.
  • Destination Management Plan 2018

    Destination Management Plan 2018

    Riverina Murray Destination Management Plan 2018 Goobarragandra River, Tumut Credit: Destination NSW Destination Riverina Murray Acknowledgement of Country Thank You Destination Riverina Murray is one of six Destination Destination Riverina Murray acknowledges the many Destination Riverina Murray would like to thank the Networks established by the NSW Government. The Aboriginal Nations and Aboriginal People of the Riverina people and organisations who have contributed to Networks are responsible for driving the growth of Murray region as the traditional carers and custodians the development of the Destination Management the visitor economy in each respective region to help of the land that we all now live and work on. We pay Plan, including Local Governments, the local tourism achieve the NSW Government’s overnight visitor our respect to Elders past, present and emerging. industry, Destination NSW, Murray Regional Tourism, expenditure goal for 2020. Destination Riverina Murray values the diversity of this Thrive Riverina, National Parks and Wildlife Service and region and works in partnership with local Aboriginal many more important contributors. Destination Riverina The Destination Networks facilitate growth in the communities to respectfully celebrate and share Murray appreciates the time you have committed to visitor economy at a local level by representing and Aboriginal culture with visitors to the region and also ensuring the Plan provides a cohesive direction and coordinating the region’s tourism industry. with locals who live here. can be effective at driving increased investment and visitation to the region. The operations of Destination Riverina Murray are Destination Riverina Murray Board funded by Destination NSW, the lead government Contact agency for the New South Wales tourism and major Genevieve Fleming | Chairperson events sector.