Protect the Last of the Wild Global Conservation Policy Must Stop the Disappearance of Earth’S Few Intact Ecosystems, Warn James E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protect the Last of the Wild Global Conservation Policy Must Stop the Disappearance of Earth’S Few Intact Ecosystems, Warn James E COMMENT ECOLOGY Domestic safari finds HISTORY How the CIA CORRESPONDENCE Staff at the FAO OBITUARY Thomas Steitz, rich biodiversity down the co-opted science in can advise on data analysis ribosome Nobel laureate, back of the sofa p.31 the cold war p.32 and interpretation p.35 remembered p.36 TAYLOR WEIDMAN/ZREPORTAGE.COM/ZUMA TAYLOR A Xikrin woman walks back to her village from the Cateté River in Brazil. Protect the last of the wild Global conservation policy must stop the disappearance of Earth’s few intact ecosystems, warn James E. M. Watson, James R. Allan and colleagues. century ago, only 15% of Earth’s are free of industrial fishing, pollution and Earth’s intact ecosystems from disappear- surface was used to grow crops and shipping are almost completely confined to ing completely. raise livestock1. Today, more than the polar regions5. A77% of land (excluding Antarctica) and Numerous studies are revealing that LAST CHANCE 87% of the ocean has been modified by the Earth’s remaining wilderness areas are In 2016, we led an international team of direct effects of human activities2,3. This is increasingly important buffers against the scientists to map the world’s remaining illustrated in our global map of intact eco- effects of climate change and other human terrestrial wilderness3,4. This year, we pro- systems (see ‘What’s left?’). impacts. But, so far, the contribution of duced a similar map for intact ocean eco- Between 1993 and 2009, an area of terres- intact ecosystems has not been an explicit systems2 (see ‘Wild Earth’). The results of trial wilderness larger than India — a stag- target in any international policy framework, these efforts show that time is running out gering 3.3 million square kilometres — was such as the United Nations’ Strategic Plan for to safeguard the health of the planet — and lost to human settlement, farming, mining Biodiversity or the Paris climate agreement. human well-being. and other pressures4. In the ocean, areas that This must change if we are to prevent Some conservationists contend that ©2018 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All ri ghts reserved. 1 NOVEMBER 2018 | VOL 563 | NATURE | 27 COMMENT particular areas in fragmented and For example, the boreal forest is the most otherwise-degraded ecosystems are more intact ecosystem on the planet and holds important than undisturbed ecosystems6,7. one-third of the world’s terrestrial carbon. Fragmented areas might provide key ser- And intact forested ecosystems are able to vices, such as tourism revenue and benefits store and sequester much more carbon than to human health, or be rich in threatened are degraded ones8. In the tropics, logging biodiversity. Yet numerous studies are start- and burning now accounts for up to 40% ing to reveal that Earth’s most intact eco- of total above-ground carbon emissions14. systems have all sorts of functions that are In the ocean, seagrass meadows that are becoming increasingly crucial2,8,9. degraded (such as by sediment pollution) Wilderness areas are now the only places switch from being carbon sinks to major that contain mixes of species at near-natural carbon sources15. levels of abundance. They are also the only Moreover, models based on geography, areas supporting the ecological processes rainfall, degree of deforestation and so on that sustain biodiversity over evolution- are starting to reveal the degree to which ary timescales10. As such, they are impor- wilderness areas regulate the climate and tant reservoirs of genetic information, and water cycles — locally, regionally and glob- act as reference areas for efforts to re-wild ally. Such areas also provide a buffer against degraded land and seascapes. extreme weather and geological events. Sim- Various analyses reveal that wilderness ulations of tsunamis, for instance, indicate areas provide increasingly important ref- that healthy coral reefs provide coastlines uges for species that are declining in land- with at least twice as much protection as scapes dominated by people11. In the seas, highly degraded ones16. they are the last regions that still contain Wilderness regions are home to some viable populations of top predators, such as of the most politically and economically tuna, marlins and sharks9. marginalized indigenous communities on Safeguarding intact ecosystems is also key Earth. These people (who number in the to mitigating the effects of climate change, hundreds of millions) are reliant on intact which are making the refuge function of marine and terrestrial ecosystems for wilderness areas especially important. A resources such as food, water and fibre17. 2009 study, for instance, showed that Car- Many have established biological and cul- ibbean coral reefs that have low levels of tural connections with their environment pollution or fishing pressure recovered from over millennia. Securing the wilderness is coral bleaching up to four times faster than central to reducing their poverty and mar- did reefs with high levels of both12. And a ginalization — and to achieving numerous 2012 global meta-analysis revealed that the UN Sustainable Development Goals, from impacts of climate change on ecological reducing inequality to improving human the protection of wilderness areas an integral communities are more severe in fragmented well-being. part of their strategy for reducing emissions. landscapes13. As an example, under the UNFCCC Many wilderness areas are critical GLOBAL TARGETS process for reducing emissions from defor- sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide. We believe that Earth’s remaining wilder- estation and forest degradation (REDD+), ness can be protected only if its importance landowners can be compensated if they is recognized within international policy refrain from clearing an area of tropical for- WILD EARTH frameworks. est that they’d planned to develop. However, Currently, some wilderness areas are there are no incentives for nations, private Mapping methods protected under national legislation such industry or communities to protect crucial as the 1964 US Wilderness Act, which carbon sinks, even when no imminent devel- To map Earth’s remaining terrestrial protects 37,000 km2 of federal land. But in opment is identified. This means that there wilderness, we used the best most nations, these areas are not formally is nothing to stop the slow erosion of these available data on eight indicators of defined, mapped or protected, and there places from small-scale and often unplanned human pressures at a resolution of is nothing to hold nations, private indus- industrial activity. Similar policies are needed 1 square kilometre. These were: built try, civil society or local communities to to protect other carbon-rich ecosystems, such environments, crop lands, pasture account for their long-term conservation. as seagrass meadows, and temperate and lands, population density, night-time What is needed is the establishment of boreal forests, especially in developed coun- lights, railways, major roadways and global targets within existing international tries that do not currently receive financial navigable waterways3,4. (Data were frameworks — specifically, those aimed at support under the UNFCCC. collected in 2009.) For our map of conserving biodiversity, avoiding dangerous Later this month, Egypt will host the intact ocean ecosystems, we used climate change and achieving sustainable 14th gathering of the Conference of the 2013 data on fishing, industrial development. Parties to the Convention on Biological shipping and fertilizer run-off, among There are several ways to do this imme- Diversity (CBD). Signatory nations, intra- 16 other indicators2. diately. The carbon sequestration and stor- governmental organizations such as the We identified wilderness land or age capacities of wilderness areas could be International Union for Conservation of ocean areas as those that were free of formally documented, and the importance Nature (IUCN), non-governmental organi- human pressures, with a contiguous of conserving them written into the policy zations and the scientific community will area of more than 10,000 km2 on land. recommendations of the UN Framework meet to work towards a strategic plan for J.E.M.W. et al. Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). the protection of biodiversity after 2020. Such a move would enable nations to make We urge participants at the meeting to 28 | NATURE | VOL 563 | 1 NOVEMBER 2018 ©2018 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All ri ghts reserved. ©2018 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All ri ghts reserved. Emperor penguins in the Ross Sea. include a mandated target for wilderness agreement to govern high-seas conserva- Signatory nations must now commit to conservation. In our view, a bold yet achiev- tion. Keeping Earth’s remaining marine implementing measures targeted at reduc- able target is to define and conserve 100% of wilderness off-limits to exploitation should ing human impacts, such as strict biosecurity all remaining intact ecosystems. be a key component of the new treaty. Strict procedures that minimize the risk of visitors PAUL NICKLEN/NGC PAUL A mandated global target will make it limits on government subsidies of harmful to Antarctica introducing invasive species. easier for governments, non-governmental fishing will also be crucial here; without organizations and entities such as the Global these, more than half of high-seas industrial LOCAL ACTION Environment Facility (a multinational fund- fishing would be unprofitable18. How can changes in policy at the global level ing programme that tackles environmental Our maps exclude Antarctica because it translate into effective national action? and sustainability problems) to leverage is off-limits to direct resource exploitation By our measure, 20 countries contain funding and mobilize action on the ground. such as mining, and the indirect effects of 94% of the world’s remaining wilderness It will also help to enable action under the human activities there are harder to meas- (excluding the high seas and Antarctica). various conventions that are attempting to ure. But it is a crucial wilderness area that More than 70% is in just five countries — protect biodiversity.
Recommended publications
  • Analysing Data on Protected Areas Work in Progress
    The OECD is developing a method to report a more detailed and harmonised account of countries’ terrestrial and marine protected areas. It applies a harmonised methodology to data from the World Database on Protected Areas. Analysing data on protected areas WORK IN PROGRESS CONTACT Head of Division Nathalie Girouard [email protected] Senior Economist Ivan Haščič [email protected] Statisticians Alexander Mackie [email protected] and Sarah Sentier [email protected] Communications Clara Tomasini [email protected] Image credits: Dormitor Park by Thomas Maluck, Flickr/CC licence. UNSDG. Perereca de folhagem Moisés Silva Lima Flickr/CC Licence. Icon TheNounProject.com http://oe.cd/env-data 2 December 2016 International goals Methodology THE WORLD DATABASE ON PROTECTED AREAS The OECD is developing an improved method to The OECD’s indicators are based on data Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) generate more detailed indicators on protected from the World Database on Protected Areas and its World Commission on Protected areas, both terrestrial and marine, for countries (WDPA), which is a geospatial database of Areas (WCPA). across the world. terrestrial and marine protected areas. The WDPA is updated monthly. It contains The WDPA is managed by the United information on more than 200 000 It applies a harmonised methodology to data Nations Environment Programme’s World protected areas. from the World Database on Protected Areas. Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) with support from the International CATEGORIES OF MANAGEMENT By 2020, conserve at least 10 per cent of coastal and The World Database on Protected Areas lists z Ia Strict Nature Reserve marine areas, consistent with national and international protected areas designated at national (IUCN z Ib Wilderness Area law and based on best available scientific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 the Natural Ecological Value of Wilderness
    204 h The Multiple Values of Wilderness USDA Forest Service. (2002).National and regional project results: 2002 National Chapter 11 Forest Visitor Use Report. Retrieved February 1,2005. from http:Nwww.fs.fed.usl recreation/pmgrams/nvum/ The Natural Ecological Value USDA Forest Service. (200 1). National und regional project results: FY2001 National Foresr ViorUse Report. Retrieved February 1,2005, from http:llwww.fs.fed.usI of Wilderness recreation/pmgrams/nvum/ USDA Forest Service. (2000).National and regional project results: CY20a) Notional Fowst Visitor Use Repor?. Retrieved February 1,2005, from http://www.fs.fed.usl recreation/programs/nvud H. Ken Cordell Senior Research Scientist and Project Leader Vias. A.C. (1999). Jobs folIow people in the nual Rocky Mountain west. Rural Devel- opmenr Perspectives, 14(2), 14-23. USDA Forest Service, Athens, Georgia Danielle Murphy j Research Coordinator, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Kurt Riitters Research Scientist USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina J. E, Harvard Ill former University of Georgia employee Authors' Note: Deepest appreciation is extended to Peter Landres of the Leopold Wilderness Research Institute for initial ideas for approach, data. and analysis and for a thorough and very helpful review of this chapter. Chapter I I-The Natural Ecological Value of Wilderness & 207 The most important characteristic of an organism is that capacity modem broad-scale external influences, such as nonpoint source pollutants. for self-renewal known QS hcaltk There are two organisms whose - processes of self-renewal have been subjected to human interfer- altered distribution of species, and global climate change (Landres, Morgan ence and control.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Wilderness Within IUCN
    Article for the International Journal of Wilderness, to be published in 2009 Defining wilderness in IUCN Nigel Dudley, Cyril F. Kormos, Harvey Locke and Vance G. Martin The IUCN protected area classification system describes and defines a suite of protected area categories and management approaches suitable for each category, ranging from strictly protected “no-go” reserves to landscape protection and non-industrial sustainable use areas. Wilderness has its own protected area category under IUCN’s classification system, Category Ib, which describes the key objectives of wilderness protection and, more importantly, identifies the limits of what is and is not acceptable in such areas. At the 2008 World Conservation Congress, a new edition of management guidelines for the IUCN categories (Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories, Dudley 2008) was published following long consultation. Guidance for wilderness protection is now more detailed and precise than in the previous 1994 edition, and as a result will help further the application of this category around the world. We describe the revisions to the new guidelines generally, and some of the implications for wilderness protected areas specifically. Wilderness areas and protected areas The term “wilderness” has several dimensions: a biological dimension, because wilderness refers to mainly ecologically intact areas, and a social dimension, because many people – from urban dwellers to indigenous groups – interact with wild nature, and all humans depend on our planet’s wilderness resource to varying degrees. A wilderness protected area is therefore an area that is mainly biologically intact, is free of modern, industrial infrastructure, and has been set aside so that humans may continue to have a relationship with wild nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctica's Wilderness Has Declined to the Exclusion of Biodiversity
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/527010; this version posted January 22, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Antarctica’s wilderness has declined to the exclusion of biodiversity Rachel I. Leihy1, Bernard W.T. Coetzee2, Fraser Morgan3, Ben Raymond4, Justine D. Shaw5, Aleks Terauds4, and Steven L. Chown1 1School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. 2Global Change Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa. 3Landcare Research New Zealand, Private Bag 92170, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. 4Australian Antarctic Division, Department of the Environment and Energy, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia. 5School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia. Recent assessments of the biodiversity value of Earth’s dwindling wilderness areas1,2 have emphasized the whole of Antarctica as a crucial wilderness in need of urgent protection3. Whole-of-continent designations for Antarctic conservation remain controversial, however, because of widespread human impacts and frequently used provisions in Antarctic law for the designation of specially protected areas to conserve wilderness values, species and ecosystems4,5. Here we investigate the extent to which Antarctica’s wilderness encompasses its biodiversity. We assembled a comprehensive record of human activity on the continent (~ 2.7 million localities) and used it to identify unvisited areas ≥ 10 000 km2 (1,6-8) (i.e. Antarctica’s wilderness areas) and their representation of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaibab National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Kaibab National Forest Forest Service Southwestern Potential Wilderness Area Region September 2013 Evaluation Report The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Kanab Creek Wilderness Kaibab National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Fire Management in a Changing World
    STEWARDSHIP Wilderness Fire Management in a Changing World BY CAROL MILLER everal strategies are available for reducing accumu- results from either human or natural causes, and the man- lated forest fuels and their associated risks, including agement objective is to stop the spread of the fire and S naturally or accidentally ignited wildland fires, man- extinguish it at the least cost (USDA and USDI 2001). In agement ignited prescribed fires, and a variety of mechanical some cases, concerns about firefighter safety and suppres- and chemical methods (Omi 1996). However, a combina- sion costs will result in a less aggressive suppression tion of policy, law, philosophy, and logistics suggest there is response to a wildfire, with features of the landscape being a more limited set of fuels man- used to allow fire to burn within a designated area. WFU is agement activities that are the management of naturally ignited wildland fires to pro- appropriate in wilderness (Bryan tect, maintain, and enhance resources in predefined areas 1997; Parsons and Landres 1998; outlined in fire management plans (USDA and USDI 2001). Nickas 1998). Naturally ignited The management objective is to allow fire, as nearly as pos- wildland fires is the commonly sible, to function in its natural ecological role. In some cases, preferred fuels management strat- certain suppression tactics might be used with WFU to pro- egy in wilderness (Miller 2003), tect life, property, or specific values of concern. Recently, with management-ignited pre- there has been discussion about effectively dissolving the scribed fire being considered in distinction between wildfire and WFU, and managing all some cases (Landres et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan for the Shoshone National Forest
    Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan Shoshone National Forest Clocktower Creek and Wapiti Ridge, Washakie Wilderness Prepared by: /s/ Greg Bevenger __________________________________ Greg Bevenger, Air Program Manager Recommended by: /s/ Bryan Armel ______________________________________________ Bryan Armel, Resources Staff Officer Recommended by: /s/ Loren Poppert ______________________________________________ Loren Poppert, Recreation Staff Officer Approved by: /s/ Rebecca Aus ______________________________________________ Rebecca Aus, Forest Supervisor May 2010 Wilderness Air Quality Value Plan Introduction Background As part of the USDA Forest Service effort to better understand and monitor wilderness areas, the agency has adopted the 10-Year Wilderness Stewardship Challenge (Forest Service 2005). The 10-Year Wilderness Stewardship Challenge was developed by the Chief’s Wilderness Advisory Group (WAG) as a quantifiable measurement of the Forest Service’s success in wilderness stewardship. The goal identified by the Wilderness Advisory Group, and endorsed by the Chief, is to bring each wilderness under Forest Service management to a minimum stewardship level by the year 2014, the fiftieth anniversary of the Wilderness Act. The Challenge was initiated in fiscal year 2005. The Challenge contains ten items that highlight elements of wilderness stewardship. These elements are 1) the natural role of fire, 2) invasive plants, 3) air quality, 4) education, 5) protection of recreational opportunities, 6) recreational site inventory, 7) outfitters
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Planning and Perceptions Of
    WILDERNESS PLANNING AND PERCEPTIONS OF WILDERNESS IN NEW SOUTH WALES ALISON JEAN RAMSAY Master of Town Planning University of New South Wales 1994 UNIVERSITY OF N.S.W. 2 4 MAR 1335 LIBRARIES CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text. (Signed) ABSTRACT Wilderness is still a controversial issue in New South Wales, despite the enactment of the NSW Wilderness Act in 1987 which gave a legislative basis to wilderness as a land use in New South Wales. Although there have been many studies of attitudes to wilderness and wilderness users in United States, there have been few such studies in Australia and none which have questioned the public's perception of what is wilderness and how it should be managed. The aim of this study was to review the history of wilderness planning in New South Wales, to examine how closely public perceptions of wilderness coincide with wilderness legislation, and to determine whether perceptions of wilderness are influenced by factors such as age, education, previous bushwalking experience or place of residence. Surveys were undertaken of almost 200 visitors to four wilderness areas in Kosciusko and Morton National Parks in New South Wales and to two areas in national parks which were not wilderness, one in Kosciusko National Park and one in Sydney Harbour National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas in Australia
    TERRESTRIAL AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS IN AUSTRALIA 2002 SUMMARY STATISTICS FROM THE COLLABORATIVE AUSTRALIAN PROTECTED AREAS DATABASE (CAPAD) Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2003 Published by: Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. Citation: Environment Australia, 2003. Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas in Australia: 2002 Summary Statistics from the Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD), The Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Assistant Secretary Parks Australia South Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601. The views and opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Minister for Environment and Heritage, or the Director of National Parks. Copies of this publication are available from: National Reserve System National Reserve System Section Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 or online at http://www.deh.gov.au/parks/nrs/capad/index.html For further information: Phone: (02) 6274 1111 Acknowledgments: The editors would like to thank all those officers from State, Territory and Commonwealth agencies who assisted to help compile and action our requests for information and help. This assistance is highly appreciated and without it and the cooperation and help of policy, program and GIS staff from all agencies this publication would not have been possible. An additional huge thank you to Jason Passioura (ERIN, Department of the Environment and Heritage) for his assistance through the whole compilation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Final-Forest-Plan-Shoshone.Pdf
    Responsible official Daniel J. Jirón Regional Forester Rocky Mountain Region 740 Simms Street Golden, CO 80401 For more information Joseph G. Alexander Forest supervisor Shoshone National Forest 808 Meadow Lane Avenue Cody, WY 82414 Olga Troxel Acting Forest Planner Shoshone National Forest 808 Meadow Lane Avenue Cody, WY 82414 Telephone: 307.527.6241 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Terms used in this document ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC LAW 98-406—AUG. 28, 1984 98 STAT. 1485 Public Law 98-406 96Th Congress An
    PUBLIC LAW 98-406—AUG. 28, 1984 98 STAT. 1485 Public Law 98-406 96th Congress An Act To designate certain national forest lands in the State of Arizona as wilderness, and Aug. 28, 1984 for other purposes. [H.R. 4707] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Arizona be cited as the "Arizona Wilderness Act of 1984". Wilderness Act of 1984. National TITLE I Wilderness Preservation SEC. 101. (a) In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act System. (16 U.S.C. 1131-1136), the following lands in the State of Arizona are National Forest hereby designated as wilderness and therefore as components of the System. National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) certain lands in the Prescott National Forest, which com­ 16 use 1132 prise approximately five thousand four hundred and twenty note. acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Apache Creek Wilderness—Proposed , dated February 1984, and which shall be known as the Apache Creek Wilderness; (2) certain lands in the Prescott National Forest, which com­ 16 use 1132 prise approximately fourteen thousand nine hundred and fifty note. acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Cedar Bench Wilderness—Proposed , dated August 1984, and which shall be known as the Cedar Bench Wilderness; (3) certain lands in the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest, 16 use 1132 which comprise approximately eleven thousand and eighty note. acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Bear Wallow Wilderness—Proposed , dated March 1984, and which shall be known as the Bear Wallow Wilderness; (4) certain lands in the Prescott National Forest, which com­ 16 use 1132 prise approximately twenty-six thousand and thirty acres, as note.
    [Show full text]
  • Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets
    Report Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets Highlights Authors d Globally important wilderness areas are ignored in James E.M. Watson, conservation policy Danielle F. Shanahan, Moreno Di Marco, ..., d We reveal that extensive losses of wilderness have occurred Eric W. Sanderson, Brendan Mackey, in the last two decades Oscar Venter d Efforts aimed at protecting wilderness areas are failing to keep pace with its loss Correspondence [email protected] d International policy must recognize the actions needed to maintain wilderness areas In Brief Watson et al. discover that the Earth’s wilderness areas are disappearing at a rate that has significantly outpaced their protection over the past two decades. Despite their ecological, climatological, and cultural importance, wilderness areas are ignored in multilateral environmental agreements, highlighting the need for urgent global policy attention. Watson et al., 2016, Current Biology 26, 2929–2934 November 7, 2016 ª 2016 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.049 Current Biology Report Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets James E.M. Watson,1,2,7,* Danielle F. Shanahan,1 Moreno Di Marco,1,3 James Allan,1 William F. Laurance,4 Eric W. Sanderson,2 Brendan Mackey,5 and Oscar Venter6 1School of Geography, Planning, and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 2Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx, NY 10460, USA 3ARC Centre of Excellence
    [Show full text]