DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Review and Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Review and Analysis Technical Review and Analysis Date: December 21, 2020 Subject: Technical Review and Analysis of Proposed Revision to Shoreline Jurisdiction City of Vancouver Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review From: Brian Carrico, WSP USA To: Rebecca Kennedy, City of Vancouver Route To: Matt Harding, Port of Vancouver USA INTRODUCTION The City of Vancouver (City) is undertaking a periodic review of the City’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) as required by the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA).1 The purpose of periodic review is to ensure the SMP (1) stays current with changes in laws and rules, (2) remains consistent with other city plans and development regulations, and (3) is responsive to changed circumstances, new information, and improved data. For amendments proposed under (3), the City must complete a review and analysis of the changed circumstances, new information, and/or improved data to support the amendments.2 As part of their review, the City is considering a modification to the definition of “shorelands” in Section 2.1 of the SMP in order to address one of the primary issues that emerged from ongoing stakeholder coordination with the Port of Vancouver. Outside of certain shorelines along the Columbia River where the standard shoreline jurisdiction3 already applies, the proposed revision would change the jurisdiction for High and Medium Intensity shoreline environment designations (SEDs), which are intended to support some level of development, to the standard jurisdiction. The revisions would maintain shoreline jurisdiction as the full extent of the 100-year floodplain within the SEDs that are intended for conservancy. The modification is described in the following section and is intended to strike a balance between accommodating primarily 1 The Shoreline Management Act of 1971, Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 90.58, and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 173-26, as amended. 2 WAC 173-26-090(3)(b)(iii) 3 RCW 90.58.0303(2)(d) "Shorelands" or "shoreland areas" means those lands extending landward for two hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark; floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred feet from such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of this chapter; the same to be designated as to location by the department of ecology. WSP USA Suite 300 210 East 13th Street Vancouver, WA 98660-3231 +1 360-823-6100 WSP.com MEMO: Revisions to Shoreline Jurisdiction December 14, 2020 Page 2 developed shorelines (and the reasonable use of those properties) with the protection of natural resources and large expanses of relatively undeveloped floodplain. This memorandum summarizes the technical review and analysis conducted to evaluate the City’s proposed amendment to the definition and applicability of “shorelands” against the foundational documents of the 2012 comprehensive update in order to verify they are not in conflict and to identify any implications. APPROACH AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The SMA applies to “shorelands” or “shoreland areas” which are defined as including lands extending 200 feet from the ordinary highway water mark, floodways and contiguous floodplain areas 200 feet from floodways as well as associated wetlands.4 The definition further allows counties and cities to expand the definition to include the full extent of the 100-year floodplain. Through the adoption of its current SMP, the City elected to include this expanded jurisdiction with the exception of lands along the Columbia River from Wintler Park downstream to the eastern boundary of the Port of Vancouver (Port) Parcel 3 property. Under the current proposal, the shoreline jurisdiction for SEDs that are intended for conservation of the shoreline (Natural, Urban Conservancy, Rural Conservancy Residential, and Rural Conservancy Resource Lands) would not change from the full extent of the 100-year floodplain. For SEDs intended to support higher levels of development (High Intensity and Medium Intensity) and on those parcels along the Columbia River from the eastern boundary of Wintler Park to the Vancouver Lake Flushing Channel, the standard shoreline jurisdiction would apply. This approach is supported by the Washington Department of Ecology’s guidance for shoreline jurisdiction, as identified in the Shoreline Master Programs Handbook.5 Per the handbook, local governments may opt to include all or part of the floodplain in shoreline jurisdiction and should consider the larger context when making this decision (for example, existing floodplain protections in the critical areas ordinance (VMC 20.740), how far the floodplains extend from the shoreline, etc.). The proposed revision would require a text amendment to SMP Section 2.1(1)6 where the shoreline jurisdiction is specified and corresponding changes to the Shoreline Designation Map. The text and map changes for this proposed amendment can be reviewed on the City’s SMP Periodic Review project website. 4 RCW 90.58.030(2)(d) 5 Washington Department of Ecology. Shoreline Master Programs Handbook. August 2009. Publication No. 11-06- 010. Accessed on February 17, 2020 at: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1106010.html 6 City of Vancouver SMP at page 2-1 MEMO: Revisions to Shoreline Jurisdiction December 14, 2020 Page 3 Applicable Regulations According to WAC 173-26-090, local governments conducting periodic review should consider whether to incorporate any amendments needed to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data. Local governments should also consider whether the significance of these items warrants amendments.7 RCW 90.58.030(2)(d) defines the extent of shoreline jurisdiction. By the nature of its construction, the definition leaves it fully up to the local jurisdiction to expand the extent of shoreline jurisdiction to include some or all of the 100-year floodplain so long as the minimum jurisdiction is met, and does not have criteria to include these areas (or remove them). WAC 173-26-110 identifies the submittal requirements for SMP updates. These include amended SED map(s), showing both existing and proposed designations, together with corresponding boundaries described in text for each change of SED. A jurisdiction must also provide written justification for the proposed changes in SED based on existing development patterns, the biophysical capabilities and limitations of the shoreline being considered, and the goals and aspirations of the local citizenry as reflected in the locally adopted comprehensive land use plan. The City’s proposed amendment applies only to the definition of “shorelands” and where shoreline jurisdiction is applied, and does not propose to change any existing shoreline environment designations (e.g. from one designation to another). AFFECTED AREAS The proposed modifications would only take place within city limits and would not apply to shoreline areas in the Urban Growth Area (UGA). The approximate shoreline areas where these changes would occur are shown on the attached figures (Attachment A). As shown, the jurisdiction changes would occur to shorelines of the state associated with the Columbia River and Burnt Bridge Creek. While changes would occur to shoreline areas south of Vancouver Lake, these areas are associated with the Columbia River and not the lake. Consistent with Section 2.1.2 of the SMP, the actual extent of shoreline jurisdiction on a given site will be based on site specific survey information. Approximately 682 acres (35 acres Medium Intensity, 647 acres High Intensity) would be removed from shoreline jurisdiction, spread across 895 parcels. The vast majority of the lands affected by this are located at the Port of Vancouver or along Fruit Valley Road and are designated and zoned as Heavy Industrial and Light Industrial. The remaining areas along Burnt Bridge Creek include lands designated as Urban Medium Residential and zoned Higher-Density Residential District and Light Industrial. For any areas removed from shoreline jurisdiction, future development activities would still be subject to applicable critical areas requirements (including those applicable to floodplains) and the development regulations of the underlying zoning designation. 7 WAC 173-26-090 section (3)(b)(iii) MEMO: Revisions to Shoreline Jurisdiction December 14, 2020 Page 4 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Several foundational documents were prepared to support the 2012 comprehensive update of the SMP including the Inventory & Characterization Report (ESA Adolfson et al., 2010) and the Restoration Plan (ESA Adolfson et al., 2011). These reports were prepared by the Clark County Coalition, which included the City of Vancouver and several other cities in southwest Washington. These documents were reviewed to understand how the proposed changes to shoreline jurisdiction would align with their findings. The evaluation determined that the proposed changes would not conflict with these foundational documents. Inventory and Characterization Report The purpose of an Inventory and Characterization Report is to establish the baseline against which the standard “no net loss of shoreline ecological functions” is measured. The previously prepared Inventory and Characterization Report was reviewed to determine if there are any changes to shoreline conditions that should be considered in light of the proposed revisions. The Inventory and Characterization Report divided shoreline
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synthesis of Biological Research On
    DRAFT FINAL November 2007 Review of Biological Research on Juvenile and Adult Salmonid use of Vancouver Lake Prepared by: Portland District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Review of Biological Research on Juvenile and Adult Salmonids and Survival at Vancouver Lake Abstract This document provides a synthesis of known biological research on juvenile and adult salmonids at Vancouver Lake, Vancouver Washington. This review of literature was prepared to support the Portland District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement with the Vancouver Lake Watershed Partnership under the Corps Section 536 program. This specialized Corps program authority promotes the improvement of tidally influenced off-channel habitat in the Lower Columbia River. The goal of this report is to provide the Corps of Engineers the best information available to make management decisions on whether or not to move forward with improving habitat for salmonids at Vancouver Lake. Background and Lake History Vancouver Lake (approximately 2,600 acres) provides a variety of functions to the surrounding community including wildlife habitat, flood control, boating, bird watching, hiking, hunting and other recreational activities as well as environmental education and stewardship opportunities. The Lower Columbia River has been impacted over the past 100 years by the implementation of navigation features associated with the Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Navigation Channel, urban and rural development, federally funded flood control projects, and flow fluctuations attributable to the Federal Columbia River Power System. The cumulative effect of these actions has contributed to the degradation of the quality and quantity of the off-channel habitat in the Columbia River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 13 Issue Number 5
    The Guide's Forecast - volume 13 issue number 9 Northwest Oregon and Washington’s most complete and accurate fishing forecast Forecasting for the fishing week of February 4th – February 10th, 2011 Oregon Fisheries Update: An EXCELLENT steelhead season clearly lies ahead. With great catches anticipated well into spring, pro guide Bob Rees (503) 812-9036 currently has just a few openings for the rest of the season. Call Bob now or email him at [email protected] to book a day for north coast steelhead. Choose either March 7th, 15th, 18th or 20th. Now is the time to get your order in for Bob’s Bait Wraps. A long time tested tool for securing prawns to your backbouncing rig, sardine fillets to your Flatfish or Kwikfish or bait for trout and bottomfish, these high visibility, high quality elastics will help you catch more fish. Order through our secure online tackle store located here: http://www.theguidesforecast.com/store/cart.php?cat=Fishing+Gear 3 guide pack minimum purchase and price includes shipping! http://www.TheGuidesForecast.com (c) Page 1 of 16 March 4, 2010 Willamette Valley/Metro- With the Willamette River blown out, motivated anglers will take to the mainstem Columbia upstream of the influence of the Willamette River at Kelly Point Park. Davis Bar and the I-5 area should continue to produce some catches of spring chinook. Gillnets will take the week off as test netting yielded more wild steelhead than spring chinook. These quality steelhead are likely destined for the Sandy and Clackamas systems. Willamette flow continued to moderate through the end of February as winter steelhead counts tapered off.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Fishing in Washington Regulations Pamphlet
    STATE OF WASHINGTON 19981998 pamphletpamphlet editionedition FISHINGFISHING ININ WASHINGTONWASHINGTON Effective from May 1, 1998, to April 30, 1999, both dates inclusive. Contents INFORMATION Commission and Director Message .... 4 Information Phone Numbers .................................... 6 How to use this pamphlet ..................... 7 ? page 6 GENERAL RULES License Information .............................. 8 License Requirements ......................... 9 License & General Rules Definitions ...................................... 10-11 General Rules ................................ 12-13 page 8 MARINE AREA RULES Marine Area Rules ............................... 14 Marine Area Rules Marine Area Map and Definitions ........ 15 Marine Area Rules & Maps............. 17-39 Salmon ID Pictures ............................. 16 page 17 Selected Marine Fish ID Pictures ........ 40 SHELLFISH/SEAWEED RULES Shellfish/Seaweed Rules Shellfish/Seaweed General Rules ...... 41 Shellfish ID Pictures ............................ 42 page 41 Shellfish/Seaweed Rules .............. 43-51 FRESHWATER RULES Statewide General Statewide Freshwater Rules.......... 52-54 Freshwater Rules page 52 SPECIAL RULES Westside Rivers ............................. 55-85 Selected Game Fish ID Pictures.... 61-62 Special Rules W SPECIAL RULES Westside Rivers page 55 Westside Lakes ............................. 86-96 Westside Lakes Access Areas ........... 96 W Special Rules SPECIAL RULES Eastside Rivers ............................ 97-108 Westside Lakes page 85 Eastside
    [Show full text]
  • Round Lake Nature Trail Guide
    located at the kiosk. Thank you! Thank kiosk. the at located Otherwise, please return it to the box the to it return please Otherwise, Feel free to keep this trail guide. trail this keep to free Feel Clark County Clean Water Program Water Clean County Clark Funded by the by Funded lark.wa.gov www.c the Clark County website at website County Clark the Or, check out the Clean W Clean the out check Or, ater Program on Program ater Email [email protected]; Email or Guide extension 4345; extension 397-6118, at (360) at Clean Water Program Water Clean Call Clark County County Clark Call this trail guide: trail this For more information about the program or program the about information more For Trail our waterways. our mandate to reduce the amount of pollution in pollution of amount the reduce to mandate helps fund and implement a federally required federally a implement and fund helps The Clark County Clean Water Program Water Clean County Clark The Interpretive learn more about the lakes. the about more learn Cronquist, Ownbey, and Thompson and Ownbey, Cronquist, the Park and follow it back to the kiosk to kiosk the to back it follow and Park the , by Hitchcock, by , Northwest Pacific the of Plants Vascular Turn left onto the paved trail into trail paved the onto left Turn bridge. Lake Loop Lake MacKinnon Andy walkway on the east side of the highway the of side east the on walkway , by Jim Pojar and Pojar Jim by , Coast Northwest Pacific the of Plants gravel shoulder across the pedestrian the across shoulder gravel , by Peter B.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Eutrophication: Vancouver Lake, WA, USA As a Model System for Assessing Multiple, Interacting Biotic and Abiotic Drivers of Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms
    water Article Beyond Eutrophication: Vancouver Lake, WA, USA as a Model System for Assessing Multiple, Interacting Biotic and Abiotic Drivers of Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms Gretchen Rollwagen-Bollens 1,2,*, Tammy Lee 1, Vanessa Rose 1 and Stephen M. Bollens 1,2 1 School of the Environment, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, 98686, USA; [email protected] (T.L.); [email protected] (V.R.); [email protected] (S.M.B.) 2 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-360-546-9115 Received: 16 April 2018; Accepted: 8 June 2018; Published: 10 June 2018 Abstract: Eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs has contributed to an increase in the magnitude and frequency of harmful cyanobacterial blooms; however, the interactive effects of nutrient availability (eutrophication) and other abiotic and biotic drivers have rarely been comprehensively studied in the field. We undertook an eight-year (2005–2013) research program that assessed the interaction of multiple factors driving cyanobacterial blooms in Vancouver Lake, a large, shallow eutrophic lake in Washington, USA. Our program consisted of nearly continuous monthly or weekly monitoring of water quality and plankton community composition over eight years, as well as multiple zooplankton grazing experiments over three years. We found a relatively consistent seasonal succession of phytoplankton and zooplankton assemblages, and a pattern of interacting factors influencing cyanobacterial bloom dynamics. Typically, a combined effect of decreased dissolved inorganic nitrogen (N), a sudden increase of dissolved inorganic phosphorus (P), and a cascading effect of zooplankton grazing created a ‘perfect storm’ of conditions that promoted the rapid proliferation of cyanobacteria over the two to three weeks before a bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Scientific Assessment Report Vancouver Watershed Health
    INTEGRATED SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT REPORT VANCOUVER WATERSHED HEALTH ASSESSMENT Prepared for City of Vancouver, Washington Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. and Pacific Groundwater Group Note: Some pages in this document have been purposely skipped or blank pages inserted so this document will copy correctly when duplexed. INTEGRATED SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT REPORT VANCOUVER WATERSHED HEALTH ASSESSMENT Prepared for City of Vancouver Surface Water Management 4500 Southeast Columbia Way Vancouver, Washington 98661 Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1001 Southeast Water Avenue, Suite 290 Portland, Oregon 97214 Telephone: 503-228-4301 and Pacific Groundwater Group 2377 Eastlake Avenue East Suite #200 Seattle, Washington 98102 Telephone: 206-329-0141 February 20, 2019 CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Study Area and Vicinity ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Your Watershed Answer
    Welcome teachers! This work booklet is based on the Stormwater Partners new online tool, ‘Explore Your Watershed’, an ArcGIS StoryMap. This StoryMap was created by Eric Lambert of Clark County Public Works with a grant from the Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board to be an immersive learning experience based on information about the ten major watersheds in Clark County. These asynchronous, self-paced worksheets can be added to your Google classroom, or printed in packets for physical distribution, and can be used in lieu of the Student Watershed Monitoring Network’s in class introductory presentation to prepare students to understand how watersheds function while setting the stage for collecting and interpreting their monitoring site’s water quality data. These worksheets can be done in the order and/or subject matter you choose. To explore this StoryMap, follow this link: https://arcg.is/iGXrq If you have any questions, contact Eric Lambert at [email protected] or Rainy Rau at [email protected] Chapter 1 – Clark County Watersheds! 1. What is a watershed? Hint: Watch the video in the ‘What is a watershed?’ section. a. An area of land that drains to a common stream, river or lake. b. A shed that holds water. c. A place in the forest where water comes from. 2. How many miles of streams are in Clark County? Hint: Look in the ‘Our streams’ section. a. 1,000 miles b. 2,000 miles c. More than 2,400 miles 3. What is the largest watershed that is entirely in Clark County? Hint: Watersheds along the border of Clark County also encompass other counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Shillapoo Wildlife Area Fish Passage Barrier and Fish Screen Scoping Report
    SHILLAPOO WILDLIFE AREA FISH PASSAGE AND DIVERSION SCREENING SCOPING REPORT HABITAT PROGRAM TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS DIVISION (TAPPS) BY TOM BURNS May 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wished to acknowledge the assistance of Brian Calkins, John Wienheimer and Jason Kunz in developing this report. Eva Wilder created the maps and tables for this report. Mike Barber provided guidance and editing. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….……………… 1 SITE DESCRIPTION……………………………………………….………………... 2 METHODS…………………………………………………………………………… 3 RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………….. 4 North Unit Field Evaluations…………………………………………………. 4 South Unit Field Evaluations…………………………………………………. 6 Vancouver Lake Unit Field Evaluations……………………………………… 8 DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………… 8 LITERATURE CITED……………………………………………………………….. 12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Shillapoo Wildlife Area………………………………………………….…. 2 Figure 2. Shillapoo Wildlife Area, North Unit………………………….…………….. 5 Figure 3. Shillapoo Wildlife Area, South Unit………………………………………... 7 Figure 4. Shillapoo Wildlife Area, Vancouver Lake Unit…………………………….. 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. A two-year investigative summary of sites initially inventoried by WDFW In 2003…………………………………………………………………........ 11 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SHILLAPOO WILDLIFE AREA FISH PASSAGE AND DIVERSION SCREENING SCOPING REPORT TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS DIVISION (TAPPS) – HABITAT PROGRAM MAY 2007 Introduction This report summarizes the results of WDFW’s scoping efforts on the Shillapoo Wildlife Area to correct fish passage barriers
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Algal Control Techniques with Implications for Vancouver Lake
    Lake Algal Control Techniques with Implications for Vancouver Lake Vancouver Lake Watershed Partnership December 9, 2009 — Version 1 Table of Contents Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Techniques Explored in this Document: ............................................................................................. 2 Best Management Practices .................................................................................................................. 2 Water Level Drawdown ........................................................................................................................ 4 Lake Sediment Removal ........................................................................................................................ 5 Recruit/Plant Rooted Plants ................................................................................................................. 6 Modify Lake Footprint .......................................................................................................................... 7 Dilution and Flushing ........................................................................................................................... 8 Biomanipulation ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report Lacamas Lake Annual Data Summary for 2007
    Monitoring Report Lacamas Lake Annual Data Summary for 2007 Background Since the original settlement of Clark County, land use changes have dramatically altered Lacamas Lake and resulted in conditions that reduce the lake’s suitability for fishing, swimming, and aesthetic enjoyment. High nutrient inputs (primarily phosphorus but also nitrogen) from the watershed have been identified as a major contributing factor. Ongoing problems include summertime dissolved oxygen depletion, poor water clarity, high levels of algae growth, nuisance blue-green algae blooms, and dense beds of aquatic plants. Grant-funded activities implemented by Clark County and other agencies between 1987 and 2001 reduced agricultural phosphorus sources and increased public awareness of lake issues. Water quality monitoring indicated that phosphorus concentrations in the lake and its major tributary, Lacamas Creek, were substantially reduced during this period. Despite these improvements, however, water quality problems persist in Lacamas Lake. Since the conclusion of grant-funded work in 2001, Clark County’s Clean Water Program has continued routine monitoring of this resource to provide information for future lake management decisions. This report summarizes monitoring activities and data collected from May through October 2007. Historical lake data and nutrient loading were most recently summarized following data collection in 2003. The April 2004 report Lacamas Lake Nutrient Loading and In-Lake Conditions may be viewed at http://www.clark.wa.gov/water-resources/documents.html. Summaries of grant-funded activities from 1987 through 1998 are also available. Lake Description Location Lacamas Lake and Round Lake are located in Clark County, Washington, on the northern boundary of the city of Camas.
    [Show full text]
  • RAPTOR ROAD TRIP Count Birds Anywhere for at Least 15 Minutes on One Or More of the 4 Count Days
    Spring & Summer Camp Registration AUDUBON SOCIETY of PORTLAND begins Jan 14 at 8am — Page 7 JANUARY/ Black-throated FEBRUARY 2016 Gray Warbler Volume 80 Numbers 1&2 Warbler Bringing Outdoor LED Streetlights: Wildlife Care Center’s Summer School to All Good News or Bad? Online Auction: Feb 14 – Mar 7 Camp insert Page 2 Page 4 Page 5 included Rough- Northern Harrier legged Hawk Scoping out Bald Eagles, immature (top) the raptors and adult Pileated Woodpecker. Photo by Jim Griffis 19th Annual Sharp- Great Backyard shinned Hawk Bird Count February 12–15 he Great Backyard Bird Count is a 4-day count Merlin held each February with the goal of getting a Tsnapshot of bird numbers and distribution Come Celebrate Birds of Prey across the globe. As a participant, you commit to at the 11th Annual RAPTOR ROAD TRIP count birds anywhere for at least 15 minutes on one or more of the 4 count days. Tally the number of Saturday, February 6th • 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. individuals of each species you see and enter your totals xploreSauvie Island in search of the magnificent Bald have to be an ‘early bird’ and at birdsource.org/gbbc. Eagles, hawks, and falcons that spend the winter on get up at the crack of dawn Ethe island. On this special day devoted to raptors, to see these birds of prey, you Last year Great Backyard experienced naturalists and hawk experts will host activities should allow approximately Bird Count participants and answer your questions at four locations around the three hours to visit all four counted birds all over the Black-capped Chickadee.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan
    City of Camas Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan Submitted to: City of Camas, Washington 616 NE Fourth Avenue Camas, WA 98607 Prepared by: Otak, Inc. 700 Washington Street, Suite 401 Vancouver, WA 98660 Otak Project No.16060 April 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................. v Section 1—Introduction........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Plan Goals.............................................................................................................................2 1.3 Previous Studies...................................................................................................................5 Section 2—Regulatory Environment ..................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................7 2.2 The Clean Water Act (CWA).............................................................................................7 2.3 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)..........................................................................11 2.4 Endangered Species Act (ESA) .......................................................................................14 2.5 City of Camas Municipal Code
    [Show full text]