DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Arroyo Grande Approved Street Tree List Acceptable Planting Characteristics Locations 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Arroyo Grande Approved Street Tree List Acceptable Planting Characteristics Locations 1 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST ACCEPTABLE PLANTING CHARACTERISTICS LOCATIONS 1. In parkway or tree well with City Approval (root C = Fall Color D = Deciduous barrier shall be used) 2. 3 to 7.5 feet from curb or sidewalk if present F = Flowering (root barrier shall be used) 3. 7.5 to 10 feet from the curb or sidewalk if E = Evergreen Present (root barrier may be required) BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CHARACTERISTICS HEIGHT/WIDTH LOCATION (IN FEET) Acacia stenophylla Shoestring Acacia E F 30’ / 20’ 1 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple D 80’ / 80’ 3 Aesculus xcarnea Red Horse Chestnut D F 40’ / 30’ 2 – 3 Agonis flexousa Peppermint Willow E F 40’ / 30’ 1 – 2 Albizia julibrissin Silk Tree D F 40’ / 40’ 2 – 3 Arbutus marina Marina Madrone E F 40’ / 40’ 1 – 3 Betula nigra River Birch D 90’ / 60’ 3 Betula pendula European White Birch D 40’ / 20’ 2 - 3 Brahea edulis Guadalupe Island Palm E F 30’ / 10’ 1 Brachychiton acerifolius Australian Flame Tree E F 60’ / 30’ 3 Callistemon viminalis Weeping Bottlebrush E F 30’ / 20’ 1 – 2 Cassia leptophylla Gold Medallion Tree Semi-E F 30’ / 20’ 1 – 2 Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar E 80’ / 40’ 3 Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud D C 60’ / 40’ 1 – 3 Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Tree E 50’ / 60’ 3 Corymbia ficifolia Red Flowering Gum E F 40’ / 40’ 2 – 3 Crategus phaenopyrum Washington Hawthorn D C F 25’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat E F 15’ / 10’ 1 – 3 Erythrina crista-galli Cockspur Coral Tree D F 20’ / 20’ 2 – 3 Eucalyptus nicholii Willow-leafed Peppermint E 50’ / 35’ 2 – 3 Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver Dollar Gum E 65’ / 40’ 2 – 3 Eucalyptus torquata Coral Gum E F 36’ / 30’ 1 – 3 Fraxinus augustifolia Raywood Ash D C 60’ / 40’ 1 – 3 Geijera parviflora Australian Willow E 30’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Ginkgo biloba Maidenhair Tree D C 50’ / 30’ 1 – 3 Hymenosporum flavum Sweetshade E F 40’ / 20’ 1 – 2 Ilex-opaca American Holly E 50’ / 40’ 2 – 3 Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda D F 40’ / 30’ 2 – 3 Lagerstroemia Hybrid Japanese Crape Myrtle D C F 30’ / 30’ 1 – 3 Lyonothamnus floribundus Catalina Ironwood E 35’ / 15’ 1 – 3 Magnolia grandiflora Braken’s Brown Beauty E F 40’ / 15’ 1 – 3 Glen St. Mary E F 20’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Little Gem Magnolia E F 25’ / 15’ 1 – 3 Majestic Beauty E F 45’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Southern Magnolia E F 80’ / 60’ 3 Magnolia soulangeana Saucer Magnolia D F 25’ / 25’ 2 – 3 Melaleuca linariifolia Flaxleaf Paperbark E F 30’ / 25’ 2 – 3 Melaleuca quinquernervia Cajeput Tree E F 40’ / 25’ 2 – 3 Metasecquoia Dawn Redwood D 90’ / 20’ 3 glyptostroboides Metrosideros excelsus New Zealand Christmas E F 30’ / 30’ 1 – 3 Tree Michelia doltsopa Sweet Michelia E F 30’ / 25’ 1 – 2 Olea europaea Swan Hill Olive E 35’ / 30’ 2 - 3 Picea pungens glauca Colorado Blue Spruce E 60’ / 20’ 3 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine E 80’ / 35’ 3 Pinus eldarica Calabrian Pine E 80’ / 25’ 3 Pinus pinea Italian Stone Pine E 80’ / 60’ 3 Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache D C 60’ / 40’ 2 – 3 Pittosporum undulatum Victorian Box E F 40’ / 40’ 2 – 3 Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree D 80’ / 40’ 2 – 3 Platanus racemosa California Sycamore D 80’ / 50’ 3 Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine E 60’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Prunus cerasifera Krauter Vesuvius D F 18’ / 15’ 1 – 3 Pyrus calleryana Aristocrat D C F 40’ / 20’ 1 – 3 CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST ACCEPTABLE PLANTING CHARACTERISTICS LOCATIONS 1. In parkway or tree well with City Approval (root C = Fall Color D = Deciduous barrier shall be used) 2. 3 to 7.5 feet from curb or sidewalk if present F = Flowering (root barrier shall be used) 3. 7.5 to 10 feet from the curb or sidewalk if E = Evergreen Present (root barrier may be required) BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CHARACTERISTICS HEIGHT/WIDTH LOCATION (IN FEET) Pyrus calleryana (cont) Callery Pear D C F 40’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Capital D C F 40’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Chanticleer D C F 40’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Red Spire D C F 40’ / 20’ 1 – 3 Pyus kawakamii Evergreen Pear E F 30’ / 30’ 1 – 3 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak E 70’ / 70’ 3 Quercus ilex Holly Oak E 60’ / 60’ 3 Quercus suber Cork Oak E 60’ / 60’ 3 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust D F 40’ / 30’ 2 – 3 Salix babylonica Weeping Willow D 50’ / 50’ 3 Ulmas parvifolia Chinese Evergreen Elm E 60’ / 60’ 2 – 3 Zelkova serrata Sawleaf Elm D C 60’ / 60’ 2 – 3 For additional information please visit: Cal Poly Select A Tree Selectree.calpoly.edu The Arbor Day Foundation The Right Tree in the Right Place www.arborday.org/trees/righttreeandplace .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12
    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Anthropogenic Impacts on Avifaunal Assemblages in an Urban Parkland, 1976 to 2007
    Animals 2014, 4, 119-130; doi:10.3390/ani4010119 OPEN ACCESS animals ISSN 2076-2615 www.mdpi.com/journal/animals Article Environmental and Anthropogenic Impacts on Avifaunal Assemblages in an Urban Parkland, 1976 to 2007 Sara Elizabeth Ormond 1,†, Robert Whatmough 2, Irene Lena Hudson 3,‡ and Christopher Brian Daniels 4,* 1 School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 2 11 Wakefield, St Kent Town, SA 5067, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 4 Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia † Present Address: Department for Environment, Water and Natural Resources, 2/17 Lennon Street, Clare, SA 5453, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]. ‡ Present Address: School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-8302-2317; Fax: +61-8-8302-5613. Received: 11 December 2013; in revised form: 10 March 2014 / Accepted: 12 March 2014 / Published: 17 March 2014 Simple Summary: Over 32 years, the bird species assemblage in the parklands of Adelaide showed a uniform decline. Surprisingly, both introduced and native species declined, suggesting that even urban exploiters are affected by changes in the structure of cities. Climate and anthropogenic factors also cause short term changes in the species mix.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Resolving Lamiales Relationships
    Schäferhoff et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:352 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/352 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences Bastian Schäferhoff1*, Andreas Fleischmann2, Eberhard Fischer3, Dirk C Albach4, Thomas Borsch5, Günther Heubl2, Kai F Müller1 Abstract Background: In the large angiosperm order Lamiales, a diverse array of highly specialized life strategies such as carnivory, parasitism, epiphytism, and desiccation tolerance occur, and some lineages possess drastically accelerated DNA substitutional rates or miniaturized genomes. However, understanding the evolution of these phenomena in the order, and clarifying borders of and relationships among lamialean families, has been hindered by largely unresolved trees in the past. Results: Our analysis of the rapidly evolving trnK/matK, trnL-F and rps16 chloroplast regions enabled us to infer more precise phylogenetic hypotheses for the Lamiales. Relationships among the nine first-branching families in the Lamiales tree are now resolved with very strong support. Subsequent to Plocospermataceae, a clade consisting of Carlemanniaceae plus Oleaceae branches, followed by Tetrachondraceae and a newly inferred clade composed of Gesneriaceae plus Calceolariaceae, which is also supported by morphological characters. Plantaginaceae (incl. Gratioleae) and Scrophulariaceae are well separated in the backbone grade; Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae appear in distant clades, while the recently described Linderniaceae are confirmed to be monophyletic and in an isolated position. Conclusions: Confidence about deep nodes of the Lamiales tree is an important step towards understanding the evolutionary diversification of a major clade of flowering plants. The degree of resolution obtained here now provides a first opportunity to discuss the evolution of morphological and biochemical traits in Lamiales.
    [Show full text]
  • TREES Botanical Common Acacia Aneura Mulga Acacia Berlandieri
    TREES Botanical Common Acacia aneura Mulga Acacia berlandieri Guajillo Acacia craspedocarpa Leatherleaf Acacia Acacia farnesiana Sweet Acacia Acacia rigidula Blackbrush Acacia Acacia salicina Willow Acacia Acacia saligna Blue Leaf Wattle Acacia stenophylla Shoestring Acacia Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco Albizia julibrissin Silk tree, Mimosa Tree Arecastrum romanzoffianum Queen Palm Bauhinia blakeana Hong Kong Orchid Tree Bauhinia lunarioides White Orchid Tree Bauhinia Purpurea Purple Orchid Tree Bauhinia variegata Purple Orchid Tree Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm Brahea edulis Guadalupe Island Palm Butia Capitata Pindo Palm Caesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote Callistemon viminalis Bottle Brush Tree Ceratonia siliqua Carob Tree Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow Chitalpa X tashkentenis Chitalpa Chorisia speciosa Silk floss Tree, Kapok Cupressus arizonica Arizona Cypress Cupressus Sempervirens Italian Cypress Dalbergia sissoo Indian Rosewood Dalea spinosa Desert Smoke Tree Eriobotrya japonica Loquat, Japanese Plum Eucalyptus cinerea Silver-Dollar Tree Eucalyptus krusaena Kruses Eucalyptus Eucalyptus microtheca Coolibah Tree Eucalyptus papuana Ghost Gum Eucalyptus spathulata Swamp Mallee Eysenhardtia orthocarpa Kidneywood Fraxinus uhdei Evergreen Ash Geijera parviflora Australian Willow Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Lysiloma watsonii var. thornberi Feather Tree Melaleuca quinquenervia Cajeput
    [Show full text]
  • Container Grown Tree Guide CONTAINER GROWN TREE GUIDE
    Container Grown Tree Guide CONTAINER GROWN TREE GUIDE The following information is intended to assist growers, buyers, and Trees in the desert Southwest are sold and priced by container size and architects with selling, purchasing and design implementation of container specified or described based on their height, width and caliper. Of these grown trees. This publication does not in any respect prevent anyone – criteria, tree caliper is a widely recognized indicator of root mass. It is the whether a member of the Association or not – from growing, marketing, most visible way to determine if a tree is under or over grown in its current distributing or buying plant material that does not conform to this guide as container or that the structure of the root system has been compromised in sizes may vary due to market availability. This guide is subject to periodic the process of growing the tree in the nursery. review and revision, and users are encouraged to visit the Arizona Nursery Association website at www.azna.org to download the most current copy. In the pursuit of value, the motto “bigger is better” must be carefully applied when purchasing container grown landscape trees. The notion that a large This guide was prepared and published by the grower members of the tree growing in a smaller box is a bargain is usually incorrect in the long Arizona Nursery Association. The growers appreciate and acknowledge the run. Longevity, growth and vigor of trees depend on a well developed and assistance and cooperation of the Arizona chapter of the American Society proportional root system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands South Australia in 2003
    A BIODIVERSITY SURVEY OF THE ADELAIDE PARK LANDS SOUTH AUSTRALIA IN 2003 By M. Long Biological Survey and Monitoring Science and Conservation Directorate Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2003 The Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands, South Australia was carried out with funds made available by the Adelaide City Council. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Adelaide City Council or the State Government of South Australia. This report may be cited as: Long, M. (2003). A Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands, South Australia in 2003 (Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Department for Human Services, Housing, Environment and Planning Library 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 AUTHOR M. Long Biological Survey and Monitoring Section, Science and Conservation Directorate, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) ANALYSIS AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Maps: Environmental Analysis and Research Unit, Department for Environment and Heritage COVER DESIGN Public Communications and Visitor Services, Department for Environment and Heritage. PRINTED BY © Department for Environment and Heritage 2003. ISBN 0759010536 Cover Photograph: North Terrace and the River Torrens northwards to North Adelaide from the air showing some of the surrounding Adelaide Park Lands Photo: Department for Environment and Heritage ii Adelaide Park Lands Biodiversity Survey PREFACE The importance of this biodiversity survey of the Adelaide Park Lands cannot be overstated. Our Adelaide Park Lands are a unique and invaluable ‘natural’ asset.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioclimatic Suitability of Actual and Potential Cultivation Areas for Jacaranda Mimosifolia in Chinese Cities
    Article Bioclimatic Suitability of Actual and Potential Cultivation Areas for Jacaranda mimosifolia in Chinese Cities Chunping Xie 1, Guowu Zhang 2,*, Chiyung Jim 3,* , Xuefeng Liu 2, Peijian Zhang 2, Jianhuang Qiu 1,2 and Dawei Liu 4 1 Landscape Department, College of Coastal Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjing 524088, China; [email protected] (C.X.); [email protected] (J.Q.) 2 China Eucalypt Research Centre, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Zhanjiang 524022, China; [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (P.Z.) 3 Department of Social Sciences, Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China 4 Key Laboratory for Forensic Technology of Wildlife, State Forestry Administration, Nanjing Forest Police College, Nanjing 210023, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (G.Z.); [email protected] (C.J.) Abstract: Jacaranda mimosifolia is regarded as a prized ornamental tree in the urban landscape with attractive, abundant and long-lasting violet-colored flowers and graceful tree form. It has been widely cultivated in recent years in many Chinese cities. However, the lack of scientific and practical guidance to cultivate the exotic species has brought about planting failures in some areas, incurring substantial economic losses and landscape decline. A comprehensive understanding of the current spatial pattern and climatic conditions of J. mimosifolia in China can inform species choice, planting and management. We collected data on the geographical coordinates of 257 planting cities and acquired additional information from the literature and field surveys. The limiting factors for cultivation were investigated using principal component analysis (PCA) of 19 bioclimatic parameters Citation: Xie, C.; Zhang, G.; Jim, C.; of the sampled sites.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside Friendly Plant List
    ATTACHMENT A COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA FRIENDLY PLANT LIST PLANT LIST KEY WUCOLS III (Water Use Classification of Landscape Species) WUCOLS Region Sunset Zones 1 2,3,14,15,16,17 2 8,9 3 22,23,24 4 18,19,20,21 511 613 WUCOLS III Water Usage/ Average Plant Factor Key H-High (0.8) M-Medium (0.5) L-Low (.2) VL-Very Low (0.1) * Water use for this plant material was not listed in WUCOLS III, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species ** Zones for this plant material were not listed in Sunset, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species *** Zones based on USDA zones ‡ The California Friendly Plant List is provided to serve as a general guide for plant material. Riverside County has multiple Sunset Zones as well as microclimates within those zones which can affect plant viability and mature size. As such, plants and use categories listed herein are not exhaustive, nor do they constitute automatic approval; all proposed plant material is subject to review by the County. In some cases where a broad genus or species is called out within the list, there may be multiple species or cultivars that may (or may not) be appropriate. The specific water needs and sizes of cultivars should be verified by the designer. Site specific conditions should be taken into consideration in determining appropriate plant material. This includes, but is not limited to, verifying soil conditions affecting erosion, site specific and Fire Department requirements or restrictions affecting plans for fuel modifications zones, and site specific conditions near MSHCP areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Carnaby's Black-Cockatoo on the Swan
    Conservation of Carnaby’s Black‐Cockatoo on the Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia December 2006 © Eric Lehmann Bansi Shah Birds Australia WA 167 Perry Lakes Drive, FLOREAT WA 6014 Tel: (08) 9383 7749, Fax: (08) 9387 8412 Email: [email protected] Web: www.carnabyscockatoo.org This project was funded by an anonymous donation to Birds Australia WA Conservation of Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo on the Swan Coastal Plain, WA… Dec 2006… Bansi Shah ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents i. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................3 ii. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................4 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................5 2. Project objectives ................................................................................................................8 3. Methods and data collection..............................................................................................8 a. Population estimates and relative abundance............................................................................8 b. Roost site use and fidelity ..........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Further Information on Carnaby's Cockatoo in Relation to the Development of Lot 4 Underwood Avenue, Shenton Park, Western Australia (Epbc 2007/3386)
    environments coffey SPECIALISTS IN LIVING AND WORKING PLACES FURTHER INFORMATION ON CARNABY'S COCKATOO IN RELATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 4 UNDERWOOD AVENUE, SHENTON PARK, WESTERN AUSTRALIA (EPBC 2007/3386) Prepared for: The University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Highway Nedlands WA 6009 Report Date: 19 December 2007 Project Ref: 2007/1 75, V2 Written/Submitted by: Written/Submitted by: Reviewed/Approved by: 1~41- Angela Lilley Dr Scott Thompson Dr Paul van der Moezel Environmental Scientist Senior Environmental Principal Scientist/Zoologist LIBRARY rINFORMATION CENTRE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 168 ST GEORGES TERRACE PERTH Coffey Environments Pty Ltd ABN 45 090 522 759 Dilhorn House, 2 Bulwer Street Perth WA 6000 Australia T (+61) (8) 6462 7900 F (+61) (8) 6462 7936 www.coffey.com.au/environments UWA-2003-001 074_aI_V2 environments coffey SPECIALISTS IN LIVING AND WORKING PLACES 19 December 2007 WA and SA Section Environment Assessment Branch Department of Environment and Water Resources GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Attention: Ms Tessa Woollett Dear Tessa, RE: Further information required on Carnabys Cockatoo in relation to Lot 4 Underwood Avenue, Shenton Park, Western Australia (EPBC 2007/3386) As requested in your email of 12 December 2007 to Dr Paul van der Moezel, please find enclosed a report which consolidates the information we sent to the Department of Environment and Water (DEW) on two previous occasions (16 October and 29 November 2007). Could you please review this report and indicate whether we are now able to advertise the Preliminary Information package. For and on behalf of Coffey Environments Pty Ltd I Angela Lilley Paul van der Moezel Environmental Scientist Principal cc: University of Western Australia Minter Ellison Lawyers Coffey Environments Pty Ltd ABN 45 090 522 759 Dilhorn House, 2 Bulwer Street Perth WA 6000 Australia 1 (+61) (8) 6462 7900 F (+61) (8) 6462 7936 www.coffey.com.au/envjronments UWA-2003-001_074_aI_V2 RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION No.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacaranda, Fern Tree Botanical
    REMARKABLE TREES ON NII CAMPUS 1. The lilac-blue wonder Common name: Jacaranda, Fern tree Botanical Name: Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don Family: Jacaranda Family (Bignoniaceae) Where to See: Director's bungalow, M and G Blocks Jacaranda in full bloom (Photograph sourced from http://texastreeplanting.tamu.edu/Display_Onetree.aspx?tid=39) 1 A tree near the Director's bungalow (Photo courtesy: Dr Chandrima Shaha) You would not have failed to notice these days a medium-sized tree on our campus that is putting out one of the most spectacular floral displays of any tropical tree. This is the Jacaranda, cultivated for its bluish-lilac ornamental flowers. The genus Jacaranda has 49 species and is native to tropical and subtropical regions of Central America, South America, Cuba, Hispaniola and the Bahamas. However, it has been carried to all parts of the world and is popular as an avenue tree from South Africa to Australia. The city of Grafton in New South Wales, Australia for example, has been holding the annual Jacaranda Festival since 1934 to celebrate the spectacle of hundreds of lilac-blossomed trees lining its streets. The 80th event is being hosted this year during 18 October and 2 November. Featured events include a Jacaranda Ball, Jacaranda Queen Contest, procession of floats, and Jacaranda Fun Run, among others. Pretoria, South Africa is known as ‘Jacaranda City’ because of over 70,000+ flowering Jacaranda trees planted in its streets. 2 Among the events at the Grafton Festival is a Revellers at the 2013Grafton Festival contest to select the Jacaranda Queen (Picture (Picture credit credit http://agent- http://www.jacarandafestival.org.au/image lee.blogspot.in/2011/04/purple-reign-by- s/photo_gallery/2011%20Jacaranda%20Thu corrie-bond.html).
    [Show full text]
  • Jacaranda Mimosifolia Bignoniaceae D
    Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don Bignoniaceae LOCAL NAMES Amharic (yetebmenja zaf); Creole (jakaranda,flabwayan ble); English (mimosa-leaved jacaranda,jacaranda,Brazilian rose wood); French (flambouyant bleu); Spanish (tarco,jacarandá,gualanolay,flamboyán azul); Tigrigna (palasandro) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Jacaranda mimosifolia is a deciduous tree up to 20 m in height with spreading branches making a light crown. Bark pale brown and furrowed, transverse cracks dividing the ridges between the furrows into long, Flowers at Kula, Maui, Hawaii (Forest and narrow scales. The bole almost always short and malformed, and up to 40- Kim Starr) 50 cm in diameter. Leaves compound and feathery on a stalk to 40 cm; up to 30 pairs of pinnae bearing small, pointed leaflets. Flowers striking blue-violet, in clusters, each flower bell shaped, to 4 cm, usually on the bare tree before leaf growth. Fruit a rounded woody capsule to 7 cm across with a wavy edge, brown- black when mature, splitting on the tree to set free many light-winged seeds. Capsules may hang on the tree for up to 2 years. Habit at Baldwin Ave, Maui, Hawaii (Forest and Kim Starr) The generic name is a latinized form of an aboriginal name used in Brazil. BIOLOGY In Puerto Rico, flowering is from early spring to June, the fruit maturing in spring and early summer. In northern India, the tree flowers from March to April. Ninety-nine per cent of flowers open in the early hours of the morning between 5 and 7 a.m. The tree seeds annually beginning at 8-10 years old. Seed at in car, Maui, Hawaii (Forest and Kim Starr) Agroforestry Database 4.0 (Orwa et al.2009) Page 1 of 5 Jacaranda mimosifolia D.
    [Show full text]