DOCSLIB.ORG

Borishm1214.Pdf (3.627Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Borishm1214.Pdf (3.627Mb) SURFACE HOAR OBSERVATIONS AT THE SCALE OF A HELICOPTER SKIING OPERATION by Matthew John Borish A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana November 2014 © COPYRIGHT By Matthew John Borish 2014 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLDEGEMENTS This study certainly would not have been possible without the support I received from my primary advisor, Karl W. Birkeland. His tutelage and patience were unwavering. Additional assistance from the rest of my graduate committee, Steve Custer, Jordy Hendrikx, and Stuart Challendar was also greatly valued. Melanie Baldwin and Gail Weidenaar of the Earth Sciences Department certainly deserve an honorable mention. Their clerical assistance and institutional expertise were imperative. I would also like to thank the American Avalanche Association, Mazamas, Montana State University Milton J. Edie Memorial Scholarship, and Montana Association of Geographic Information Professionals for their generous funding contributions, as well as Montana State University and the Department of Earth Sciences for financial support via a graduate teaching assistantantship. The USDA Forest Service National Avalanche Center graciously loaned weather station equipment during the duration of this study which was greatly appreciated. Alaska Heliskiing also provided transportation and several hardy guides during the weather station instrument installation process at the beginning of the 2011 season. Finally, I would like to thank the owners of SEABA, Nick Trimble, Scott Sundberg, Shawn Macnamara, and Ben Anderson for the opportunity of a lifetime, financial support, and usage of helicopters, snow machines, and tools. The steadfast dedication of the guide team which included Bill Buchbauer, Christian Cabanilla, Kent McBride, Tom Wayes, David Sundnas, Reggie Crist, and William Spilo also made this research a reality. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 4 Thesis Organization ......................................................................................................... 4 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................................................... 6 Snowpack Properties and Slab Avalanche Formation .................................................... 6 Surface Hoar Formation .................................................................................................. 7 Near-Surface Facets ........................................................................................................ 9 Surface Hoar and Snow Surface Spatial Variability ....................................................... 10 Surface Hoar Modeling .................................................................................................. 15 3. METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 18 Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 18 Weather Stations ........................................................................................................... 24 Data Collection .............................................................................................................. 26 Data Management......................................................................................................... 31 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................. 32 The Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence or Absence ............................ 32 The Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ............................................ 36 4. RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 41 Event 1 ........................................................................................................................... 45 Event 1 Background and Weather ........................................................................ 45 Event 1 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ......................................... 48 Event 1 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ...................................... 51 Event 2 ........................................................................................................................... 55 Event 2 Background and Weather ........................................................................ 55 Event 2 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ......................................... 58 Event 2 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ...................................... 60 Event 3 ........................................................................................................................... 63 Event 3 Background and Weather ........................................................................ 63 Event 3 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ......................................... 67 Event 3 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ...................................... 69 Event 4 ........................................................................................................................... 72 Event 4 Background and Weather… ..................................................................... 72 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED Event 4 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ......................................... 76 Event 4 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ...................................... 79 Results Summary ........................................................................................................... 82 5. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 87 Event 1 ........................................................................................................................... 88 Event 1 Background and Weather ........................................................................ 88 Event 1 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ......................................... 89 Event 1 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ...................................... 90 Event 2 ........................................................................................................................... 91 Event 2 Background and Weather ........................................................................ 91 Event 2 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ......................................... 92 Event 2 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ...................................... 93 Event 3 ........................................................................................................................... 94 Event 3 Background and Weather ........................................................................ 94 Event 3 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ......................................... 94 Event 3 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ...................................... 96 Event 4 ........................................................................................................................... 97 Event 4 Background and Weather ....................................................................... 97 Event 4 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ........................................ 99 Event 4 Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size ..................................... 99 General Discussion ....................................................................................................... 100 Spatial Distribution of Surface Hoar Presence ................................................... 100 Surface Hoar Kriging Interpolation ..................................................................... 104 The Effect of Elevation on Surface Hoar Crystal Size .......................................... 106 Uncertainty .................................................................................................................. 110 6. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................. 112 Research Findings ........................................................................................................ 112 Future Work ................................................................................................................ 114 REFERENCES CITED .......................................................................................................... 116 APPENDIX ........................................................................................................................ 125 APPEDNIX A: Field Data .............................................................................................. 125 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Table 2.1 Snow Process Scales ........................................................................... 6 2. Table 2.2 Factors Affecting Surface Hoar Spatial Variability ........................... 12 3. Table 3.1 Haines, Alaska
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska Native and Conservation Groups Sue Bureau of Land Management for Shortsighted Approval of Mineral Exploration
    NEWS RELEASE: December 4, 2017 Contacts: Kimberley Strong | Chilkat Indian Village of Klukwan | (907) 767-5505 | [email protected] Meredith Trainor | Southeast Alaska Conservation Council | (907) 957-8347 | [email protected] Eric Holle | Lynn Canal Conservation | (907) 314-0320 | [email protected] Will Patric | Rivers Without Borders | (360) 379-2811 | [email protected] Kenta Tsuda | Earthjustice | (907) 500-7129 | [email protected] Alaska Native and Conservation Groups Sue Bureau oF Land Management for Shortsighted Approval oF Mineral Exploration Groups say agency must consider impacts of potential development before allowing project to advance beyond point of no return. Anchorage — An Alaska Native Tribal Government and three conservation groups are suing the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for failing to consider the future impacts of mine development before approving an exploration plan for a hardrock mine project in the Chilkat River watershed in Southeast Alaska. The Chilkat River — “Jilkaat Heeni” in the Tlingit language, meaning “storage container for salmon” — runs from its headwaters in the Coast Mountains of British Columbia, Canada, into the sea near Haines, Alaska. The watershed, which includes the Klehini River, provides spawning grounds for all five species of Pacific salmon, as well as anadromous eulachon and trout. The surrounding steep mountainsides, forests, and river valleys are inhabited by mountain goats, wolverines, wolves, black and brown bears, and moose. It is a spectacularly beautiful, amazingly special and unique place in this world. Where the Chilkat and Klehini Rivers meet the Tsirku River near Klukwan, alluvial deposits under the riverbeds release warm water and keep the confluence open into late autumn when other waterbodies have frozen.
    [Show full text]
  • By Rasmuson Foundation by Kyle Clayton Across Southeast Alaska and the Wayne Price Was Honored Yukon
    Assembly discusses EOC pay - page 2 Large cruise line courts Haines - page 3 Serving Haines and Klukwan, Alaska since 1966 Volume LIV, Issue 17 Thursday, April 30, 2020 $1.25 State relaxes mandates, some remain cautious As oil prices By Kyle Clayton Injury Disaster Loan Emergency While some local business owners Advance because she has no crash, residents are expanding operations since the employees, and she was turned state’s “Reopen Alaska Responsibly” away from applying for a Paycheck question high plan began Friday, some are reluctant Protection Program (PPP) loan to open their doors. In the midst because First National Bank Alaska is of reopening, some businesses are currently not accepting applications pump prices unable to apply for federal relief for that program. By Kyle Clayton loans and are reeling from the loss She said she’ll have to drum up Oil prices began to plummet in of revenue. local support and find additional mid-February due to the COVID-19 The state released a health mandate revenue streams. She said she is worldwide pandemic and economic last week that loosened restrictions planning on renting out a part of her downturn and bottomed out around on retail businesses, restaurants, building to another business. April 21. Haines gas prices are still personal care services, fishing First National Bank Alaska Haines higher than most communities across charters and other non-essential branch manager Wendell Harren the region, which has befuddled some businesses. said the bank is no longer accepting Haines residents. The Magpie Gallery owner Laura applications because they’re still “A barrel of oil costs 12 bucks, but Rogers has three children who can’t processing an “unprecedented not if you go to Delta Western,” Fred go to school and her husband, Manuel, amount and continue to process Shields quipped this week.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Status and Escapement Goals for Salmon Stocks in Southeast Alaska
    Special Publication No. 04-02 Stock Status and Escapement Goals for Salmon Stocks in Southeast Alaska Harold J. Geiger and Scott McPherson, Editors June 2004 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Miles Master Title Plats and Land Status Case-Files
    ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Klutshah Mountain Map Legend ! ! Burro Creek ! Nataga Creek F reebee River ! Johnson Creek Bureau of Land Management Rosaunt! Creek Mosquito Lake Fish and Wildlife Service ! Sturgills Camp and Picn ic Area ! Forest Service Metlakatla Indian Res. Milit ary Kasidaya Creek ! Mount HardingNational Park Serv! ice ± Chilkoot River Mount Prinsep Native Patent or IC ! Kasidaya Creek Native Selected (BLM) Private Chilkat Peak! State Patent or TA Bear Creek Goat Hollow ! ! ! Connolly Lake ! Ziskokadlo State Selected (BLM) ! Four Winds Mountain Roads DNR 1:63K Highway ! Taiya Inlet Mosquito Lake Secondary Road ! JUNEAU Forestry Development Roads ! Mount Cheetdeekahyu Lutak Census Designated Place ! Halutu Ridge ^ ! ! Mining Claim - Federal (Closed) ! ! Iron Mountain Mosquito Lake Census Designated Place Closed Mining Claims Lode Claim Lode Claim - Nat Park Little Boulder Creek Placer Claim ! Chilkoot River Placer Claim - Nat Park ! Wells ! Takshanuk Mountains Boundary Peak 144 ! Tunnel Site ! Surgeon Mountain Moose! Valley ! ! ! Klukwan ! ! ! Millsite Claim ! ! Covenant Life SUR 948 Chilkat !!! Cathedral! Peak ! !!! Chilkoot Lake Mining Cla im - Federal (Active) ! Kohklux ! ! Ferebee Valley ! Active Mi ning C lai ms ! Kluktu ! ! Klukwan Census Subarea Lode Claim ! Lutak ! Big Boulder Creek! Herman Creek ! Pleasant Camp ! ! Tsirku River Lode Claim - Nat Park ! Jarvis Creek ! ! Kalwatta Chilkoot Placer Claim Mount McDonell Klehini River ! Halutu Peninsula ! Herman Lake Placer Claim - Nat Park Porcupine ! ! ! Glacier
    [Show full text]
  • Ainealaska S
    VISITOR GUIDE HAINEAlaskA S VISITHAINES.COM WELCOME TO HAINES, ALASKA (Roaming River Photography) People all over the world travel to Haines, looking to experience what locals enjoy every day in our unique Alaskan town. Your adventure starts by deciding your mode of transportation and planning how to fit it all in. Nestled between North America’s deepest fjord and the Chilkat Range, get ready to embark on the “best-kept secret.” Explore Haines’ beautiful scenery, plentiful wildlife, cultural facilities and programs, and incredible outdoor recreation opportunities, and so much more! JOIN US! TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Getting to Haines 4 Golden Circle Tour 6 Haines History 8 Wildlife 10 Wild Things, Wild Places 14 Arts & Culture 16 Haines Map 18 Nearby Adventure Cover Photos Colors at Chilkoot Lake, Fishing 20 Accommodations Chilkoot (Tom Ganner) Skiing (Dawson Evenden) Totem Photo (Tom Ganner) 23 Local Listings Eagle (Tom Ganner) Back Cover: Picture Point Published July 2020 (Tom Ganner) Cape Prince Alfred BANKS I VICTORIA ISLAND Sachs Barrow Harbour Bay Wainwright Holman Cambridge Amundsen Beaufort Sea Cape Bathurst Gulf Prudhoe Bay Bering Strait Paulatuk Tuktoyaktuk 246 Kuguktuk Kotzebue Inuvik Selawik Aklavik 80 Seward Coldfoot Fort McPherson Gambell Bettles Old Crow Peninsula 35 Tsiigehtchic Great Nome ARCTIC CIRCLE Bear 116 Lake ST LAWRENCE 66.5˚ ISLAND Eagle Plains Fort Good Hope Yukon River Circle Livengood 231 Norman Wells Bering Sea Unalakleet Mackenzie River FAIRBANKS 5 Eagle YUKON Delta (CANADA) Hooper A L A S K A Junction Chicken
    [Show full text]
  • Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 Ii Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 Iii Acknowledgements
    Haines Coastal Management Program Final Plan Amendment With Assistance from Sheinberg Associates Juneau, Alaska Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 ii Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 iii Acknowledgements This plan revision and update would not have been possible without the help of many people who gave their time and expertise. Most important were the Haines Coastal District Coordinator Scott Hansen, who produced maps and provided support for meetings and guidance, Borough Manager Robert Venables, and the Haines Borough Planning Commission: Jim Stanford, Chair Harriet Brouillette Bob Cameron Rob Goldberg Lee Heinmiller Bill Stacy Lynda Walker The Haines Borough Mayor and Assembly also contributed to the development of this Plan. They were: Mike Case, Mayor Jerry Lapp, Deputy Mayor Scott Rossman Stephanie Scott Debra Schnabel Norman Smith Herb VanCleve Others who assisted in the development of this plan by providing information or by following its development include local groups such as the Takshanuk Watershed Council and Chilkat Indian Association. State and Federal staff were helpful in their review and comments on resource inventory and analysis and policy development. Gina Shirey-Potts, OPMP was especially attentive and helpful as were Patty Craw, DGGS-ADNR; Joan Dale, SHPO-ADNR; Mike Turek, ADFG; Roy Josephson, Forestry and Roselynn Smith, ADNR. My apologies to anyone inadvertently left off the acknowledgements. Frankie Pillifant, Sheinberg Associates. Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 iv Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A, Index Map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada Showing the Glacierized Areas (Index Map Modi- Fied from Field, 1975A)
    Figure 100.—A, Index map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada showing the glacierized areas (index map modi- fied from Field, 1975a). B, Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the St. Elias Mountains in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image from Mike Fleming, USGS, EROS Data Center, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska. K122 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD St. Elias Mountains Introduction Much of the St. Elias Mountains, a 750×180-km mountain system, strad- dles the Alaskan-Canadian border, paralleling the coastline of the northern Gulf of Alaska; about two-thirds of the mountain system is located within Alaska (figs. 1, 100). In both Alaska and Canada, this complex system of mountain ranges along their common border is sometimes referred to as the Icefield Ranges. In Canada, the Icefield Ranges extend from the Province of British Columbia into the Yukon Territory. The Alaskan St. Elias Mountains extend northwest from Lynn Canal, Chilkat Inlet, and Chilkat River on the east; to Cross Sound and Icy Strait on the southeast; to the divide between Waxell Ridge and Barkley Ridge and the western end of the Robinson Moun- tains on the southwest; to Juniper Island, the central Bagley Icefield, the eastern wall of the valley of Tana Glacier, and Tana River on the west; and to Chitistone River and White River on the north and northwest. The boundar- ies presented here are different from Orth’s (1967) description. Several of Orth’s descriptions of the limits of adjacent features and the descriptions of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Characteristics and Population Status of Anadromous Salmon in South- East Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture Biological Characteristics Forest Service Pacific Northwest and Population Status of Research Station General Technical Anadromous Salmon in Report PNW-GTR-468 January 2000 Southeast Alaska Karl C. Halupka, Mason D. Bryant, Mary F. Willson, and Fred H. Everest Authors KARLC. HALUPKAwas a postdoctoral research associate at the time this work was done; and MASON D. BRYANTand FRED H. EVEREST(retired) are research fish- eries biologists and MARYF. WILLSON was a research ecologist, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 2770 Sherwood Lane, Juneau, AK 99801. Halupka currently is a fisheries biologist, National Marine Fisheries Service, Santa Rosa, CA, and Willson is the science director, Great Lakes Program, The Nature Conservancy, Chicago, IL. Cover art by: Detlef Buettner Abstract Halupka, Karl C.; Bryant, Mason D.; Willson, Mary F.; Everest, Fred H. 2000. Biological characteristics and population status of anadromous salmon in south- east Alaska. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-468. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 255 p. Populations of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in southeast Alaska and adjacent areas of British Columbia and the Yukon Territory show great variation in biological characteristics. An introduction presents goals and methods common to the series of reviews of regional salmon diversity presented in the five subsequent chapters. Our primary goals were to (1) describe patterns of intraspecific variation and identify specific populations that were outliers from prevailing patterns, and (2) evaluate escapement trends and identify potential risk factors confronting salmon populations. We compiled stock-specific information primarily from management research con- ducted by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
    [Show full text]
  • Of97-0159.Pdf
    3 ENTRIES Addicott, W.O., Winkler, G.R., and Plafker, G., 1978, Preliminary megafossil stratigraphy and correlation of selected stratigraphic sections of the Gulf of Alaska Tertiary province: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-491, 2 pl. Aitken, J.O., 1959, Atlin map-area, British Columbia: Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 307, 89 p. Arksey, R.L,, and Mihalynuk, M.G., 1989, Results of regional stream sediment and lithogeochemical surveys in the Fantail Lake (west) and Warm Creek (east) map area (NTS 104M/9W and 10E): British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources, Geological Survey Branch, Open File 1989-13, scale 1:50,000, 1 sheet. Baggs, D,W,, and Sherman, G.E,, 1987, Feasibility of economic zinc, copper, silver, and gold mining in the Porcupine mining area of the Juneau mining district, Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Mines Report 15-87, 28 p. Bailey, E.A., Arbogast, B.F., Smaglik, S.M., and Light, T.D., 1985, Analytical results and sample locality map for stream-sediment and heavy-mineral-concentrate samples collected in 1983 and 1984 from the Juneau, Taku River, Atlin, and Skagway quadrangles, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Oper File Report 85-437, 91 p., scale 1:250,000, 1 sheet. Barker, F., 1987, Cretaceous Chisana island arc of Wrangellia, eastern Alaska (abs): Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, v. 19, no. 7, p. 580. Barker, F., and Arth, J.G., 1990, Two traverses across the Coast batholith, southeastern Alaska, in Anderson, J.L., ed., The nature and origin of Cordilleran magmatism: Geological Society of America Memoir 174, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Research Findings from a Study of the Sociocultural Effects of Tourism in Haines, Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture Preliminary Research Forest Service Findings From a Study of Pacific Northwest Research Station the Sociocultural Effects of General Technical Tourism in Haines, Alaska Report PNW-GTR-612 Lee K. Cerveny July 2004 The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. USDA is committed to making its information materials accessible to all USDA customers and employees. Author Lee K. Cerveny is a research social scientist, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 400 N 34th Street, Suite 201, Seattle, WA 98103.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart 5-25 Haines Event Visitors, 2008-2011
    Despite receiving few cruise ships in port, Haines benefits from the Skagway cruise ship port of call because Haines businesses and the HCVB worked to develop opportunities for cruise passengers to visit Haines during their stay in Skagway. In 2011, approximately 28,500 cruise ship passengers visited Haines via fast day ferry between Skagway and Haines to do day excursions in Haines. These visitors spent an average of $135 per person in Haines during their stay in 2011, or $3.8 million (2011 Haines Cruise and Fast Ferry Passenger Survey, McDowell Group). Dependable fast day boat runs between these communities is essential to capture this business. The Haines Borough’s Convention and Visitor Bureau has partnered with community organizations and businesses to actively create destination events and market them. The Haines Chamber of Commerce’s annual events calendar lists a number of activities that attract nearly 15,000 independent visitors annually (Chart 5-25). The largest of these is the multi-day Southeast Alaska State Fair that features live music, food, arts and crafts, farm animals, and amusement rides. In 2011, this event attracted 11,500 people. The next largest event is the 148 mile Kluane Chilkat International Bike Race in June, popular with local, Juneau and Whitehorse residents. Chart 5-25 Haines Event Visitors, 2008-2011 15,000 12,500 10,000 7,500 5,000 2,500 - 2008 2009 2010 2011 SE Fair Spring Fling 187 187 187 187 Eagle Festival 271 266 Alaska Brew Fest 665 683 953 1,009 Kluane Bike Race 1,200 1,041 1,282 1,223 SE State Fair 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,500 HAINES BOROUGH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN / September 2012 page 92 The opportunities for recreation related tourism are deep in the community with access to so many varied outdoor settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Haines State Forest Management Plan
    HAINES STATE FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN August 2002 Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Mining, Land & Water, Resource Assessment & Development Section Division of Forestry ALASKA DIVISION OF FORESTRY HAINES STATE FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN August 2002 Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Mining, Land & Water, Resource Assessment & Development Section Division of Forestry This document has been released by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water, Resource Assessment & Development Section, for the purpose of informing agencies and the public about the Haines State Forest Plan, at a cost of $16.75 per copy, in Anchorage, Alaska. Table of Contents Haines State Forest Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS HAINES STATE FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Chapter 1 ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE OF THE HAINES STATE FOREST Differences Between State Forest Plan and Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve Plan ............ 1 Purpose and Organization ............................................................................................. 2 Study Area .....................................................................................................................5 Relationship of this Plan to Other DNR Plans................................................................ 6 Research – Recreation, Land Status, Habitat & Wildlife and Forestry Resources......... 7 Plan Implementation .................................................................................................... 11 Modification of the Plan...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]