GIT: Esophagus-Stomach- Small Intestine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
“A Dissertation on Endoscopic Biopsy Yield in Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies” Dissertation Submitted To
“A DISSERTATION ON ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY YIELD IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES” DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU DR.M.G.R MEDICAL UNIVERSITY In partial fulfillment of the regulations for the award of the M.S.DEGREE EXAMINATION BRANCH I GENERAL SURGERY DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY STANLEY MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL THE TAMILNADU DR.M.G.R MEDICAL UNIVERSITY CHENNAI APRIL 2015 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the dissertation titled “A DISSERTATION ON ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY YIELD IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES” is the bonafide work done by Dr. P.ARAVIND, Post Graduate student (2012 – 2015) in the Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai under my direct guidance and supervision, in partial fulfillment of the regulations of The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai for the award of M.S., Degree (General Surgery) Branch - I, Examination to be held in April 2015. Prof.DR.C.BALAMURUGAN M.S Prof.DR.S.VISWANATHAN M.S Professor of Surgery Professor and Dept. of General Surgery, Head of the Department, Stanley Medical College, Dept. of General Surgery, Chennai-600001. Stanley Medical College, Chennai-600001. PROF. DR.AL.MEENAKSHISUNDARAM, M.D., D.A., The Dean, Stanley Medical College, Chennai - 600001. DECLARATION I, DR.P.ARAVIND solemnly declare that this dissertation titled “A DISSERTATION ON ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY YIELD IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES” is a bonafide work done by me in the Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai under the guidance and supervision of my unit chief. Prof. DR.C.BALAMURUGAN, Professor of Surgery. This dissertation is submitted to The Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. -
Abdominal Pain - Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
ACS/ASE Medical Student Core Curriculum Abdominal Pain - Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ABDOMINAL PAIN - GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE Epidemiology and Pathophysiology Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most commonly encountered benign foregut disorders. Approximately 20-40% of adults in the United States experience chronic GERD symptoms, and these rates are rising rapidly. GERD is the most common gastrointestinal-related disorder that is managed in outpatient primary care clinics. GERD is defined as a condition which develops when stomach contents reflux into the esophagus causing bothersome symptoms and/or complications. Mechanical failure of the antireflux mechanism is considered the cause of GERD. Mechanical failure can be secondary to functional defects of the lower esophageal sphincter or anatomic defects that result from a hiatal or paraesophageal hernia. These defects can include widening of the diaphragmatic hiatus, disturbance of the angle of His, loss of the gastroesophageal flap valve, displacement of lower esophageal sphincter into the chest, and/or failure of the phrenoesophageal membrane. Symptoms, however, can be accentuated by a variety of factors including dietary habits, eating behaviors, obesity, pregnancy, medications, delayed gastric emptying, altered esophageal mucosal resistance, and/or impaired esophageal clearance. Signs and Symptoms Typical GERD symptoms include heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, excessive eructation, and epigastric pain. Patients can also present with extra-esophageal symptoms including cough, hoarse voice, sore throat, and/or globus. GERD can present with a wide spectrum of disease severity ranging from mild, intermittent symptoms to severe, daily symptoms with associated esophageal and/or airway damage. For example, severe GERD can contribute to shortness of breath, worsening asthma, and/or recurrent aspiration pneumonia. -
The Digestive System
Connective tissue The Digestive System Part 1 Structure of digestive system Functions Basic Structure of the Alimentary Canal Wall Tube is made up of four layers: 1. Mucosa 2. Submucosa 3. Muscularis externa 4. Serosa (Peritoneum) or Adventitia Mucosa The innermost wall of the alimentary tube. Consists of: • Epithelium - usually simple columnar epithelium with goblet cells; may be stratified squamous if protection is needed (e.g. esophagus) • Lamina propria – loose connective tissue • Muscularis mucosae – takes part in the formation of folds Submucosa Made up of loose connective tissue. Contains submucosal (Meissner’s) nervous plexus and blood vessels, sometimes glands. Muscularis externa Usually two layers of smooth muscle: • inner circular layer • outer longitudinal layer. • Myenteric (Auerbach’s) nervous plexus in between • Responsible for peristalsis (controlled by the nerve plexus) Outer membrane • A serous membrane/peritoneum consisting of the mesothelium (simple squamous epithelium), and a small amount of underlying loose connective tissue. • Or adventitia consisting only of connective tissue is found where the wall of the tube is directly attached or fixed to adjoining structures (i.e., body wall and certain organs). Enteric nervous system The Alimentary Canal Pharynx Common respiratory and digestive pathway (both air and swallowed food and drinks pass through). • Stratified squamous non-keratinized epithelium • Lamina propria contains many elastic fibers • No muscularis mucosae • No submucosa • Striated muscle in the muscularis externa Esophagus Fixed muscular tube that delivers food and liquid from the pharynx to the stomach. Esophagus Epithelium - stratified squamous Mucosal and submucosal glands of the esophagus secrete mucus to lubricate and protect the luminal wall. Esophageal glands proper lie in the submucosa. -
Vestibule Lingual Frenulum Tongue Hyoid Bone Trachea (A) Soft Palate
Mouth (oral cavity) Parotid gland Tongue Sublingual gland Salivary Submandibular glands gland Esophagus Pharynx Stomach Pancreas (Spleen) Liver Gallbladder Transverse colon Duodenum Descending colon Small Jejunum Ascending colon intestine Ileum Large Cecum intestine Sigmoid colon Rectum Appendix Anus Anal canal © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Nasopharynx Hard palate Soft palate Oral cavity Uvula Lips (labia) Palatine tonsil Vestibule Lingual tonsil Oropharynx Lingual frenulum Epiglottis Tongue Laryngopharynx Hyoid bone Esophagus Trachea (a) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 Upper lip Gingivae Hard palate (gums) Soft palate Uvula Palatine tonsil Oropharynx Tongue (b) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 Nasopharynx Hard palate Soft palate Oral cavity Uvula Lips (labia) Palatine tonsil Vestibule Lingual tonsil Oropharynx Lingual frenulum Epiglottis Tongue Laryngopharynx Hyoid bone Esophagus Trachea (a) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 Visceral peritoneum Intrinsic nerve plexuses • Myenteric nerve plexus • Submucosal nerve plexus Submucosal glands Mucosa • Surface epithelium • Lamina propria • Muscle layer Submucosa Muscularis externa • Longitudinal muscle layer • Circular muscle layer Serosa (visceral peritoneum) Nerve Gland in Lumen Artery mucosa Mesentery Vein Duct oF gland Lymphoid tissue outside alimentary canal © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 5 Diaphragm Falciform ligament Lesser Liver omentum Spleen Pancreas Gallbladder Stomach Duodenum Visceral peritoneum Transverse colon Greater omentum Mesenteries Parietal peritoneum Small intestine Peritoneal cavity Uterus Large intestine Cecum Rectum Anus Urinary bladder (a) (b) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 6 Cardia Fundus Esophagus Muscularis Serosa externa • Longitudinal layer • Circular layer • Oblique layer Body Lesser Rugae curvature of Pylorus mucosa Greater curvature Duodenum Pyloric Pyloric sphincter antrum (a) (valve) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 7 Fundus Body Rugae of mucosa Pyloric Pyloric (b) sphincter antrum © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. -
Recent Insights Into the Biology of Barrett's Esophagus
Recent insights into the biology of Barrett’s esophagus Henry Badgery,1 Lynn Chong,1 Elhadi Iich,2 Qin Huang,3 Smitha Rose Georgy,4 David H. Wang,5 and Matthew Read1,6 1Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia 2Cancer Biology and Surgical Oncology Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, West Roxbury, Massachusetts 4Department of Anatomic Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 5Department of Hematology and Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Centre and VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas 6Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Address for correspondence: Dr Henry Badgery Department of Surgery St Vincent’s Hospital 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Vic, Australia, 3065 [email protected] Short title: Barrett’s biology This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/nyas.14432. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Keywords: Barrett’s esophagus; signaling pathways; esophageal adenocarcinoma; epithelial barrier function; molecular reprogramming Abstract Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Our understanding of the pathogenesis and of Barrett’s metaplasia is incomplete, and this has limited the development of new therapeutic targets and agents, risk stratification ability, and management strategies. -
Mechanisms Protecting Against Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux: a Review
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.3.1.1 on 1 March 1962. Downloaded from Gut, 1962, 3, 1 Mechanisms protecting against gastro-oesophageal reflux: a review MICHAEL ATKINSON From the Department of Medicine, University ofLeeds, The General Infirmary at Leeds Thomas Willis in his Pharmaceutice Rationalis pub- tion which function to close this orifice. During the lished in 1674-5 clearly recognized that the oeso- 288 years which have elapsed since this description, phagus may be closed off from the stomach and it has become abundantly clear that a closing described 'a very rare case of a certain man of mechanism does indeed exist at the cardia but its Oxford [who did] show an almost perpetual vomit- nature remains the subject of dispute. ing to be stirred up by the shutting up of left orifice Willis was chiefly concerned with the failure of this [of the stomach]'. His diagrams (Fig. 1) of the mechanism to open and does not appear to have anatomy of the normal stomach show a band of appreciated its true physiological importance. Al- muscle fibres encircling the oesophagogastric junc- though descriptions of oesophageal ulcer are to be found in the writings ofJohn Hunter and of Carswell (1838), the pathogenesis of these lesions remained uncertain until 1879, when Quincke described three cases with ulcers of the oesophagus resulting from digestion by gastric juice. Thereafter peptic ulcer of the oesophagus became accepted as a pathological entity closely resembling peptic ulcer in the stomach http://gut.bmj.com/ in macroscopic and microscopic appearances. The clinical picture of peptic ulcer of the oesophagus was clearly described by Tileston in 1906 who noted substernal pain radiating to between the shoulders, dysphagia, vomiting, haematemesis, and melaena as the principal presenting features. -
The Small and Large Intestines∗
OpenStax-CNX module: m46512 1 The Small and Large Intestines∗ OpenStax College This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0y Abstract By the end of this section, you will be able to: • Compare and contrast the location and gross anatomy of the small and large intestines • Identify three main adaptations of the small intestine wall that increase its absorptive capacity • Describe the mechanical and chemical digestion of chyme upon its release into the small intestine • List three features unique to the wall of the large intestine and identify their contributions to its function • Identify the benecial roles of the bacterial ora in digestive system functioning • Trace the pathway of food waste from its point of entry into the large intestine through its exit from the body as feces The word intestine is derived from a Latin root meaning internal, and indeed, the two organs together nearly ll the interior of the abdominal cavity. In addition, called the small and large bowel, or colloquially the guts, they constitute the greatest mass and length of the alimentary canal and, with the exception of ingestion, perform all digestive system functions. 1 The Small Intestine Chyme released from the stomach enters the small intestine, which is the primary digestive organ in the body. Not only is this where most digestion occurs, it is also where practically all absorption occurs. The longest part of the alimentary canal, the small intestine is about 3.05 meters (10 feet) long in a living person (but about twice as long in a cadaver due to the loss of muscle tone). -
Structure of the Human Body
STRUCTURE OF THE HUMAN BODY Vertebral Levels 2011 - 2012 Landmarks and internal structures found at various vertebral levels. Vertebral Landmark Internal Significance Level • Bifurcation of common carotid artery. C3 Hyoid bone Superior border of thyroid C4 cartilage • Larynx ends; trachea begins • Pharynx ends; esophagus begins • Inferior thyroid A crosses posterior to carotid sheath. • Middle cervical sympathetic ganglion C6 Cricoid cartilage behind inf. thyroid a. • Inferior laryngeal nerve enters the larynx. • Vertebral a. enters the transverse. Foramen of C 6. • Thoracic duct reaches its greatest height C7 Vertebra prominens • Isthmus of thyroid gland Sternoclavicular joint (it is a • Highest point of apex of lung. T1 finger's breadth below the bismuth of the thyroid gland T1-2 Superior angle of the scapula T2 Jugular notch T3 Base of spine of scapula • Division between superior and inferior mediastinum • Ascending aorta ends T4 Sternal angle (of Louis) • Arch of aorta begins & ends. • Trachea ends; primary bronchi begin • Heart T5-9 Body of sternum T7 Inferior angle of scapula • Inferior vena cava passes through T8 diaphragm T9 Xiphisternal junction • Costal slips of diaphragm T9-L3 Costal margin • Esophagus through diaphragm T10 • Aorta through diaphragm • Thoracic duct through diaphragm T12 • Azygos V. through diaphragm • Pyloris of stomach immediately above and to the right of the midline. • Duodenojejunal flexure to the left of midline and immediately below it Tran pyloric plane: Found at the • Pancreas on a line with it L1 midpoint between the jugular • Origin of Superior Mesenteric artery notch and the pubic symphysis • Hilum of kidneys: left is above and right is below. • Celiac a. -
Subserosal Haematoma of the Ileum
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.35.183.509 on 1 October 1960. Downloaded from SUBSEROSAL HAEMATOMA OF THE ILEUM BY ANTONIO GENTIL MARTINS From the Department of Surgery, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool (RECEIVED FCR PUBLICATION DECEMBER 21, 1959) Angiomas of the ileum are rare. Their association communicate with the lumen of the small bowel. with a duplication cyst has not so far been described. Opposite, the mucosa had a small erosion'. The unusual mode of presentation, with intestinal Microscopical examination (Figs. 3, 4 and 5) showed and a palpable mass (subserosal that 'considerable haemorrhage had occurred in the obstruction serous, muscular and mucous coats. The mucosa, haematoma) simulating intussusception, have however, was viable and the maximal zone of damage prompted the report of the present case. was towards the serosa. Numerous large capillaries were present in the coats. The lining of the diverticulum Case Report formed by glandular epithelium suggesting ileal mucosa N.C., a white male infant, born June 18, 1958, was was partly destroyed, but it had a well-formed muscular admitted to hospital on May 18, 1959, when 11 months coat': it was considered to be probably a duplication. old, with a five days' history of being irritable and appar- The main diagnosis was that of haemangioma of the ently suffering from severe colicky abdominal pain for ileum. the previous 24 hours. On the day of admission his bowels had not moved and he vomited several times. He looked pale and ill and a mass could be felt in the copyright. -
The Short Esophagus—Lengthening Techniques
10 Review Article Page 1 of 10 The short esophagus—lengthening techniques Reginald C. W. Bell, Katherine Freeman Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, Englewood, CO, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: RCW Bell; (II) Administrative support: RCW Bell; (III) Provision of the article study materials or patients: RCW Bell; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: RCW Bell; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: RCW Bell; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Reginald C. W. Bell. Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, 499 E Hampden Ave., Suite 400, Englewood, CO 80113, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Conditions resulting in esophageal damage and hiatal hernia may pull the esophagogastric junction up into the mediastinum. During surgery to treat gastroesophageal reflux or hiatal hernia, routine mobilization of the esophagus may not bring the esophagogastric junction sufficiently below the diaphragm to provide adequate repair of the hernia or to enable adequate control of gastroesophageal reflux. This ‘short esophagus’ was first described in 1900, gained attention in the 1950 where various methods to treat it were developed, and remains a potential challenge for the contemporary foregut surgeon. Despite frequent discussion in current literature of the need to obtain ‘3 or more centimeters of intra-abdominal esophageal length’, the normal anatomy of the phrenoesophageal membrane, the manner in which length of the mobilized esophagus is measured, as well as the degree to which additional length is required by the bulk of an antireflux procedure are rarely discussed. Understanding of these issues as well as the extent to which esophageal shortening is due to factors such as congenital abnormality, transmural fibrosis, fibrosis limited to the esophageal adventitia, and mediastinal fixation are needed to apply precise surgical technique. -
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Findings of Acute Pancreatitis in Ectopic Pancreatic Tissue: Case Report and Review of the Literature
University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS Radiology Publications and Presentations Radiology 2014-07-28 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI findings of acute pancreatitis in ectopic pancreatic tissue: case report and review of the literature Senthur Thangasamy University of Massachusetts Medical School Et al. Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs Part of the Digestive System Diseases Commons, and the Radiology Commons Repository Citation Thangasamy S, Zheng L, Mcintosh LJ, Lee P, Roychowdhury A. (2014). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI findings of acute pancreatitis in ectopic pancreatic tissue: case report and review of the literature. Radiology Publications and Presentations. https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/2390. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/radiology_pubs/259 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Radiology Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2014 July 28; 15(4):407-410 CASE REPORT Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Findings of Acute Pancreatitis in Ectopic Pancreatic Tissue: Case Report and Review of the Literature Senthur J Thangasamy1, Larry Zheng1, Lacey McIntosh1, Paul Lee2, Abhijit Roychowdhury1 1Department of Radiology and 2Pathology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA ABSTRACT Context Acute pancreatitisCase report in ectopic pancreatic tissue is an uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain and can be difficult to diagnose on imaging. -
1 the Anatomy and Physiology of the Oesophagus
111 2 3 1 4 5 6 The Anatomy and Physiology of 7 8 the Oesophagus 9 1011 Peter J. Lamb and S. Michael Griffin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 911 2011 location deep within the thorax and abdomen, 1 Aims a close anatomical relationship to major struc- 2 tures throughout its course and a marginal 3 ● To develop an understanding of the blood supply, the surgical exposure, resection 4 surgical anatomy of the oesophagus. and reconstruction of the oesophagus are 5 ● To establish the normal physiology and complex. Despite advances in perioperative 6 control of swallowing. care, oesophagectomy is still associated with the 7 highest mortality of any routinely performed ● To determine the structure and function 8 elective surgical procedure [1]. of the antireflux barrier. 9 In order to understand the pathophysiol- 3011 ● To evaluate the effect of surgery on the ogy of oesophageal disease and the rationale 1 function of the oesophagus. for its medical and surgical management a 2 basic knowledge of oesophageal anatomy and 3 physiology is essential. The embryological 4 Introduction development of the oesophagus, its anatomical 5 structure and relationships, the physiology of 6 The oesophagus is a muscular tube connecting its major functions and the effect that surgery 7 the pharynx to the stomach and measuring has on them will all be considered in this 8 25–30 cm in the adult. Its primary function is as chapter. 9 a conduit for the passage of swallowed food and 4011 fluid, which it propels by antegrade peristaltic 1 contraction. It also serves to prevent the reflux Embryology 2 of gastric contents whilst allowing regurgita- 3 tion, vomiting and belching to take place.