DOCSLIB.ORG

Does Downloading Torrentz Harm Your Pc “This File May Harm Your Pc” Warning When Downloading

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does Downloading Torrentz Harm Your Pc “This File May Harm Your Pc” Warning When Downloading does downloading torrentz harm your pc “This file may harm your pc” warning when downloading. Hello so i made a program in java that i want other people to download. But everytime someone downloads he sees a message with a warning prompt saying the file could harm his computer. He then gets the option to dismiss it or he can choose to download it anyways. How do you avoid this message? 1 Answer 1. This is normal behavior for most browsers. It exists to protect users who get tricked into downloading and running "software." Usually it's a file with a naming scheme like totallylegitfile.pdf.exe . Normal Windows users don't change the default to hide known extensions, so it just looks like a pdf file. Just let your users know that this might happen and tell them that it is safe. 3 Simple Reasons Why Downloading Torrents Can Be Harmful for Your Computer. This might sound unbelievable at first, but the bitter truth is that the greed of torrents might risk your computer! First of all let me ask you. Why do you depend on torrents for downloading stuff? If you want a free and legal app, you would surely find it directly using a search engine. Right? You want to download paid apps for free. Or you want a game which costs you something actually for free. You might even want your favourite movie (btw, there are other alternatives for movies, such as 123movies app) Even if you use torrents legibly, they are still harmful! I caught you this time! HAHAHA! And you should know the fact that what you are doing here is ILLEGAL! Are some ISPs mad to prevent you from downloading torrents if you use them for connecting to the world wide web? They want to prevent illegal acts happening and that is the reason why they do it. Now, you might think that. I agree with the fact that this is illegal, but how will it harm my computer? There are three simple and plain reasons for it! But before that, let me specify that torrents are not harmful, but the files attached to it might be! Ok! Ok! I wouldn’t say more on introduction. Let’s get to the reasons! 1. Peer-to-Peer exchange system can bring in viruses. Torrents run on P2P exchange. The person who downloads a file becomes a LEECHER and after downloading he can become a SEEDER. Seeders upload the file while leechers download it from them. As the seeders increase, the download speed increases as one can download bits of files from different sources! Now you might wonder about the bad side! 2. Your computer can be hacked. When you download a torrent, your IP address can be seen by everyone. If a hacker find your IP address and notices that your firewall is turned off, he can come into your PC and get all your data! The hacker finds your private IP through your public one and then attempts to enter to your system. Wolaa! He then gets access to all your data. Hackers sometimes even pay torrent uploaders for that! The greed of getting an application worth $20 for free might risk all your important stuff. Are you willing to give away your personal data, account info etc. like that? 3. You can get into legal trouble. This is where the government steps in and wins! Wondering how? Government officials sometimes keep track of torrent files with illegal content and find out who all are downloading that. They note your IP address and report it to your ISP. You then receive a notice from your ISP stating that you’ve been caught! Remember, you won’t get another chance. Thus, exposing your IP is equal to giving away your home address…… How to stay safe? Final Words. RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR. How To Create Fake ? WhatsApp Conversations On Android, iOS and PC? ? 7 Dirty Google Secrets Every Internet User Should Know. How To Enable Gmail Desktop Notifications? (Chrome/Safari) 6 COMMENTS. There are some issues with this article. Point 1: Theoretically, yes, torrenting can bring in viruses. However, that is where the community really shines. The torrenting community is exceptionally vibrant in reporting any torrents that have many issues, including viruses. However, the community goes even further. Even if the torrent may not have viruses, it may get reported if the content does not match the description. Once reported, such torrents are classified as "bad." These "bad" torrents will almost immediately plummet in their activity (seeders + leechers), and the torrent will soon die. So, if you are reasonably sensible, you will never end up with viruses. Point 2: A simple firewall setting can prevent the potentiality of being hacked. An outgoing connection monitor such as Little Snitch can add another layer of protection if you are particularly concerned. Point 3: While many people torrent to get content for free, there are also many that actually pay for content but also torrent because of the horrendous restrictions on legal content delivery systems. There is a meme which shows how much stuff you are forced to go through before you can watch a movie, for example. The torrent of the movie lets you bypass all that, and go straight to the movie. Not to mention, regional restrictions. I moved to another country. And all my dvds/blurays do not work on the player I bought in this country. I don't think it's reasonable for them to expect me to pay all over again for that content. If the content producers and distributors make it easy to buy the content and the freedom to watch/use that content the way we customers please, torrenting would substantially reduce. Geographical restrictions in the age of the Internet is outdated, and needs to go. It's in their hands, now. i suggest use a cheap dedicated machine only for torrents.. What about the ability to be tracked? and seriously a machine just dedicated for torrenting? As an author, I LIKE the fact that there are more karmic restrictions to downloading Torrents. So thank you, Yashraj! Don’t download anything to do with utorrents. My unfortunate experience: Just three days ago utorrents was unknown to me. I was at a mates place and he had it, explained what it was and showed me all the movies and games you could get amongst a host of other mouth watering files. No trouble, I’ve never had a virus and it perfectly legal he told this old pensioner. Went home, utorrent downloaded okay, went to ’10 best and safest torrents’. 10 mins later, I was talking to a very important person in the States. It’s totally illegal he informed BUT the next bit hurt. IT WILL COST YOU $US 1.000 for your computer to be repaired. You have picked up the RUSSIAN VIRUS and now have 2501, YES 2501, virus’s which has also attacked your own IP address. As I had said, ‘at that price I could buy a new nice laptop’ but he answered NO, as you carry your IP ADDRESS with you, so the problem will travel with you until cleaned. I now have no wife (just jocking!!) but I had to take the barrage she aimed in my direction. LOOK, DON’T TOUCH TORRENTS, NEVER, NEVER NEVER. I HOPE THIS WILL HAVE SAVED SOMEONE. Will Roblox give me a virus or harm my computer on download? Roblox is one of my favorite games despite it being free and I'm getting tired of playing the same limited games with limited control on mobile. I asked my parents if we can get it on the family gaming computer so I can have more control and play better games on Roblox but they think Roblox contains malware and is going to destroy the computer. The computer is very high end, an Alienware Aurora R10. I already know about the free robux scams and all that stuff but will any games infect the computer if there's like a malware script in the game or something? Thanks and I really need this because they think the game is harmful and I really want to play it on a computer for once. Thanks. 8 Bad Habits That Are Destroying Your PC. We all want our computers to last forever, but if yours seem to die before their time, your habits could be to blame. Here's some behavior to avoid. Nothing lasts forever—especially tech—but your computer can last you quite a few years if you treat it well. If your laptop tends to break down earlier than you feel it should, there's a chance you're helping it along with some especially bad habits. Here are some of the worst things you can do to a PC without even realizing you're doing anything wrong. Leaving Your Laptop on a Plush Surface (and Other Overheating Problems) Heat is your computer's mortal enemy. If your computer gets too hot, the processor may slow down, throttling itself to keep temperatures reasonable, or even shutting down completely. Running at high temperatures for extended periods can reduce the lifespan of your processor, fans, and battery as well—not to mention make your computer loud and sizzling to touch. For desktop computers, the solution is pretty simple: make sure your case has adequate airflow, with enough vents and fans to keep cool air moving through the components. That means keeping it out of tight cabinets and other spaces that trap heat.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pirate Bay Liability
    THE PIRATE BAY LIABILITY University of Oslo Faculty of Law Candidate name: Angela Sobolciakova Supervisor: Jon Bing Deadline for submission: 12/01/2011 Number of words: 16,613 10.12.2011 Abstract The thesis discuses about peer-to-peer technology and easy availability of an Internet access which are prerequisites to a rapid growth of sharing data online. File sharing activities are managing without the copyright holder‟s permission and so there is a great opportunity of infringing exclusive rights. The popular pee-to-peer website which is enabling immediate file sharing is for example www.thepiratebay.org – the object of this thesis. The copyright law is obviously breaching by end users who are committing these acts. However, on the following pages we are dealing with the third party liability – liability of online intermediaries for unlawful acts committed by their users. A file sharing through the pee-to-peer networks brings benefits for the Internet users. They need no special knowledge in order to learn how to use the technology. The service of www.thepiratebay.org website is offering simultaneously users an access to a broad spectrum of legal content and a copyright protected works. The service is mainly free of charge and the users can find a data they are interested in quickly and in a users‟ friendly format. The aim of the thesis is to compare the actual jurisprudential status of liability of intermediary information society service providers for the file sharing activities on www.thepiratebay.org. 2 Acknowledgement I would like to thank Professor Jon Bing, I am grateful to him for supervising the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Peer-Level Performance of Bittorrent
    Characterizing Peer-level Performance of BitTorrent DRP Report Amir H. Rasti ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION BitTorrent is one of the most popular Peer-to-Peer During the past few years, peer-to-peer appli- (P2P) content distribution applications over the cations have become very popular on the In- Internet that significantly contributes in network ternet. BitTorrent in one of the most popu- traffic. lar peer-to-peer applications providing scalable peer-to-peer content distribution over the In- In BitTorrent, a file is divided into segments ternet. Some recent studies [8] have shown that and participating peers contribute their outgoing BitTorrent is accountable for approximately bandwidth by providing their available segments 35% of the Internet traffic. BitTorrent is a to other peers while obtaining their missing peers scalable peer-to-peer content distribution sys- from others. Characterization of BitTorrent is use- tem that enables one-to-many distribution of ful in determining its performance bottlenecks as large files without requiring a large access link well as its impact on the network. bandwidth at the source. Similar to other peer- In this study, we try to address the following two to-peer systems, it uses resources of participat- key questions through measurement: (i) What are ing peers to increase the capacity of the system. the main factors that affect observed performance The main shared resource in BitTorrent is the by individual peers in BitTorrent?, and (ii) What up-link bandwidth of individual peers. The file are the contributions of these factors on the per- being distributed is divided into a large number formance of individual peers? To address these of segments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Peer-To-Peer Systems
    A Study of Peer-to-Peer Systems JIA, Lu A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Information Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong August 2009 Abstract of thesis entitled: A Study of Peer-to-Peer Systems Submitted by JIA, Lu for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The Chinese University of Hong Kong in June 2009 Peer-to-peer (P2P) systems have evolved rapidly and become immensely popular in Internet. Users in P2P systems can share resources with each other and in this way the server loading is reduced. P2P systems' good performance and scalability attract a lot of interest in the research community as well as in industry. Yet, P2P systems are very complicated systems. Building a P2P system requires carefully and repeatedly thinking and ex- amining architectural design issues. Instead of setting foot in all aspects of designing a P2P system, this thesis focuses on two things: analyzing reliability and performance of different tracker designs and studying a large-scale P2P file sharing system, Xun- lei. The "tracker" of a P2P system is used to lookup which peers hold (or partially hold) a given object. There are various designs for the tracker function, from a single-server tracker, to DHT- based (distributed hash table) serverless systems. In the first part of this thesis, we classify the different tracker designs, dis- cuss the different considerations for these designs, and provide simple models to evaluate the reliability of these designs. Xunlei is a new proprietary P2P file sharing protocol that has become very popular in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Torrent Crawler: a Tool for Collecting Information from Bittorrent Networks
    Torrent Crawler: a tool for collecting information from BitTorrent networks Yeounoh Chung 1. Abstract structure and the unpredictability of the clients can cause problems in the network, making errors BitTorrent is a free peer-to-peer (P2P) difficult to detect and diagnosis. The reliance of a content-sharing application with a complex and node on node local views to maintain the overlay dynamic overlay structure due to loose coupling, high structure further compounds the problem. Defects or churn rate, and varying responsiveness of nodes. The anomalies such as partitioning in the overlay or load complexity and the dynamic nature of the overlay imbalance due to biased peer selection are structure can mask the problems in the network, undetectable without partial global information and a making errors difficult to detect and diagnosis in a good understanding of the various characteristics and timely manner. Furthermore, the heavy reliance of dynamic behaviors of the network. However, such an clients on the node local views compounds the understanding was often times missing or incorrectly problems such as partitioning in the network or load obtained from non-representative measurement imbalance due to biased peer selection. studies, in which a few instrumented clients were In an effort to provide the network with used to capture the desired properties. partial global information to resolve the network Collecting representative global information problems, this project looks into introducing a tool such as peer’s download rate, known neighboring that efficiently collects global information from peers, and the network’s churn rate, from the BitTorrent network. The tool, called Torrent Crawler complex and dynamic BitTorrent network is not (TC) uses a number of techniques to efficiently find simple.
    [Show full text]
  • A Week in the Life of the Most Popular Bittorrent Swarms
    A Week in the Life of the Most Popular BitTorrent Swarms Mark Scanlon, Alan Hannaway and Mohand-Tahar Kechadi 1 UCD Centre for Cybercrime Investigation, School of Computer Science & Informatics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland {mark.scanlon, alan.hannaway, tahar.kechadi}@ucd.ie AbstractThe popularity of peer-to-peer (P2P) file distribution is c material, which typically commences with a single source sharing large sized files to many downloaders. networks lend themselves well to the unauthorised distribution of To commence the download of the content in a particular copyrighted material due to their ease of use, the abundance of - material available and the apparent anonymity awarded to the downloaders. This paper presents the results of an investigation loaded from an indexing website. This file is then opened conducted on the top 100 most popular BitTorrent swarms over using a BitTorrent client, which proceeds to connect to several the course of one week. The purpose of this investigation is to members of the swarm and download the content. Each quantify the scale of unauthorised distribution of copyrighted BitTorrent swarm is built around a particular piece of content material through the use of the BitTorrent protocol. Each IP which is determined through a unique identifier based on a address, which was discovered over the period of the weeklong SHA-1 hash of the file information contained in this UTF- 8 investigation, is mapped through the use of a geolocation encoded metadata file, e.g., name, piece length, piece hash database, which results in the ability to determine where the values, length and path.
    [Show full text]
  • Bittorrent and Bittyrant CS 344G 2/9/2015 Gregory D
    BitTorrent and BitTyrant CS 344G 2/9/2015 Gregory D. Hill BitTorrent Overview Download .torrent file or use magnet URI to get file hash, required metadata Get partial list of peers from Tracker or Kademlia-based DHT Download file from peers following peer protocol (uses TCP) 10 message types described in following slides keep-alive choke/unchoke Interested/not interested have bitfield request piece cancel Basic BitTorrent Protocol Handshake with peer, after send bitfield(length, bitfield) message which has a bit for each piece of the file representing whether that peer has that piece or not have(piece index) message – tell a peer you have piece x request(piece index, byte offset, length) to a peer hopefully reciprocated by a piece(piece index, byte offset, data) which can be aborted with a cancel(piece index, byte offset, length) Send interested() to a peer that has data you want and undo this by sending them not interested() Piece Selection First piece: choose at random until a complete piece downloaded Normal: Rarest First, try to download piece fewest peers have Endgame: on last pieces, request all subpieces left from all peers, send cancels to others when data arrives BitTorrent Choking Refuse to upload to, or choke, all but a few (commonly 4) peers Upload even share to these unchoked peers Prefer to give to peers who upload most to you (tit-for-tat) Every 10 seconds decide which mutually interested peer to unchoke based on best rolling 20 second average of download rate from peers If no reciprocation from an
    [Show full text]
  • Problems with Bittorrent Litigation in the United States: Personal Jurisdiction, Joinder, Evidentiary Issues, and Why the Dutch Have a Better System
    Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 13 Issue 1 2014 Problems with BitTorrent Litigation in the United states: Personal Jurisdiction, Joinder, Evidentiary Issues, and Why the Dutch Have a Better System Violeta Solonova Foreman Washington University in St. Louis, School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Violeta Solonova Foreman, Problems with BitTorrent Litigation in the United states: Personal Jurisdiction, Joinder, Evidentiary Issues, and Why the Dutch Have a Better System, 13 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 127 (2014), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol13/iss1/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROBLEMS WITH BITTORRENT LITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES: PERSONAL JURISDICTION, JOINDER, EVIDENTIARY ISSUES, AND WHY THE DUTCH HAVE A BETTER SYSTEM INTRODUCTION In 2011, 23.76% of global internet traffic involved downloading or uploading pirated content, with BitTorrent accounting for an estimated 17.9% of all internet traffic.1 In the United States alone, 17.53% of internet traffic consists of illegal downloading.2 Despite many crackdowns, illegal downloading websites continue to thrive,3 and their users include some of their most avid opponents.4 Initially the Recording Industry Association of America (the “RIAA”) took it upon itself to prosecute individuals who 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Libswift P2p Protocol: an Analysis and Extension
    Master Thesis - TRITA-ICT-EX-2012-262 LIBSWIFT P2P PROTOCOL: AN ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION Fu Tang Design and Implementation of ICT products and systems Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) [email protected] October 30th, 2012 Supervisor: Flutra Osmani Examiner: Bj¨ornKnutsson Department: ICT School, NSLab Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) 1 Abstract More and more end-users are using P2P protocols for content sharing, on-demand and live streaming, contributing considerably to overall Internet traffic. A novel P2P streaming protocol named libswift was developed to enable people experience a better service by consuming less resources and transferring less unnecessary functions and metadata. This master thesis studies the inner functioning of libswift and analyzes some of the vulnerabilities that directly impact performance of the protocol, namely download speed and response delay. By investigating the behavior of libswift in scenarios with multiple peers, we found that the lack of a peer selection mechanism inside the protocol affects download efficiency and response time. We also discovered that libswift's internal piece picking algorithm raises competition among peers, thus not fully utilizing connected peers. In addition, we found that current libswift implementation does not follow the specification for PEX peer discovery, thus we modified PEX algorithm to support another message that is used to proactively request new peers from the currently connected. Having made these observations, we designed and implemented a peer selection extension interface that allows for third-party peer selection mechanisms to be used with libswift protocol. Apropos, we tested the interface (or adapter) with an example peer selection mechanism that groups peers according to properties such as latency and locality.
    [Show full text]
  • CS 3700 Networks and Distributed Systems
    CS 3700 Networks and Distributed Systems Lecture 18: Peer-to-Peer Systems Revised 3/23/13 2 Outline ❑ Peer-to-Peer Overview ❑ Example: Bittorrent ❑ µTP: Micro Transport Protocol ❑ Cheating on BitTorrent Traditional Internet Services Model 3 Client-server ! Many clients, 1 (or more) server(s) ! Web servers, DNS, file downloads, video streaming Problems ! Scalability: how many users can a server support? ■ What happens when user traffic overload servers? ■ Limited resources (bandwidth, CPU, storage) ! Reliability: if # of servers is small, what happens when they break, fail, get disconnected, are mismanaged by humans? ! Efficiency: if your users are spread across the entire globe, how do you make sure you answer their requests quickly? The Alternative: Peer-to-Peer 4 A simple idea ! Users bring their own resources to the table ! A cooperative model: clients = peers = servers The benefits ! Scalability: # of “servers” grows with users ■ BYOR: bring your own resources (storage, CPU, B/W) ! Reliability: load spread across many peers ■ Probability of them all failing is very low… ! Efficiency: peers are distributed ■ Peers can try and get service from nearby peers The Peer-to-Peer Challenge 5 What are the key components for leveraging P2P? ! Communication: how do peers talk to each other ! Service/data location: how do peers know who to talk to New reliability challenges ! Network reachability, i.e. dealing with NATs ! Dealing with churn, i.e. short peer uptimes What about security? ! Malicious peers and cheating ! The Sybil attack Centralized
    [Show full text]
  • Bittorrent - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia File:///H:/Bittorrent.Htm
    BitTorrent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia file:///H:/BitTorrent.htm BitTorrent From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the protocol. For the client, see BitTorrent client. BitTorrent is the name of a peer-to-peer (P2P) file Internet protocol suite distribution protocol, and is the name of a free Layer Protocols software implementation of that protocol. The protocol was originally designed and created by Application DNS, TLS/SSL, The BitTorrent logo programmer Bram Cohen, and is now maintained TFTP, FTP, HTTP, IMAP, IRC, NNTP, by BitTorrent Inc. BitTorrent is designed to POP3, SIP, SMTP, distribute large amounts of data widely without SNMP, SSH, incurring the corresponding consumption in costly TELNET, server and bandwidth resources. CacheLogic BitTorrent, RTP, suggests that BitTorrent traffic accounts for ~35% rlogin, … [1] of all traffic on the Internet, while other sources Transport TCP, UDP, DCCP, are skeptical.[2] SCTP, IL, RUDP, … Network IP (IPv4, IPv6), The original BitTorrent client was written in ICMP, IGMP, ARP, Python. Its source code, as of version 4.0, has been RARP, … released under the BitTorrent Open Source Data link Ethernet, Wi-Fi, License, which is a modified version of the Jabber Token ring, PPP, Open Source License. There are numerous SLIP, FDDI, ATM, compatible clients, written in a variety of DTM, Frame Relay, programming languages, and running on a variety SMDS, … of computing platforms. BitTorrent clients are programs which implement the BitTorrent protocol. Each BitTorrent client is capable
    [Show full text]
  • Receiver Anonymity Within a Distributed File Sharing Protocol
    Master thesis Computing Science Cyber Security Specialization Radboud University Receiver anonymity within a distributed file sharing protocol Author: Main supervisor/assessor: Solo Schekermans Dr. Jaap-Henk Hoepman S4811070 Second assessor: Dr. ir. Erik Poll August 2019 2 Abstract. In this thesis, we explore the field of receiver anonymity within a file sharing protocol. Exploring existing solutions, such as Resilio Sync, reveals that at this moment, a “ready to use” solution does not yet exist. Looking at the most promising solution that offers a private manner of sharing files over a peer-to- peer network, we find that the most suitable protocol to implement receiver ano- nymity is actually BitTorrent. An existing solution, called BitBlender, does a good job of adding receiver an- onymity to BitTorrent by using crowds, but does have several flaws that need to be resolved. Most flaws are easy to mitigate but one, the absence of incentives for crow members, requires an overhaul of the protocol. To incentivize the crowd members, a token based protocol is proposed that uti- lizes blind signatures and attribute based credentials. Keywords: Anonymity, peer-to-peer, file sharing, BitTorrent, Resilio Sync, BitBlender, incentivizing relay peers, blind signatures, attribute based creden- tials. 3 Contents 1 Introduction __________________________________________________ 4 2 Contextual environment _________________________________________ 5 2.1 Definitions _______________________________________________ 5 2.2 Architecture models ________________________________________ 6 2.3 Existing solutions/products __________________________________ 7 2.4 Privacy __________________________________________________ 8 3 Goal of the system ____________________________________________ 10 4 BitTorrent & Resilio Sync ______________________________________ 12 4.1 BitTorrent Protocol _______________________________________ 13 4.2 Resilio Sync protocol ______________________________________ 21 5 BitBlender by Bauer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • May 6, 2021 Blockchain and Bankruptcy
    May 6, 2021 Blockchain and Bankruptcy: Short term and long term observations of how blockchain technology can affect the law and practice of bankruptcy Presented by the Orange County Bankruptcy Forum SPEAKERS Jonathan Dunsmoor Securities Attorney | Investor | Blockchain Believer William J. Wall The Wall Law Office Bankruptcy Attorney MODERATOR Anerio V. Altman Lake Forest Bankruptcy Date/Time: Thursday, May 6, 2021 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm PT This activity has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education by the State Bar of California in the amount of 1.5 hours of CLE. The Orange County Bankruptcy Forum certifies that this activity conforms to the standards for the approved education activities prescribed by the rules and regulations of the State Bar of California governing MCLE. OCBF ● 6789 Quail Hill Parkway #204 ● Irvine, CA 92603 Phone/Fax: 949-681-8676 ● [email protected] www.OCBF.org. OCBF 2021 SPONSORS PLATINUM GOLD SILVER BIOS Jonathan C. Dunsmoor, Esq. is a US corporate attorney who focuses his practice on securities law and regulatory matters including blockchain related offerings, asset management in DeFi, and governance tokens. Mr. Dunsmoor represents private companies, including those exploring blockchain/ cryptocurrency opportunities, as well as angel investors and investment funds. He has extensive experience in structuring, negotiating and consummating public and private securities offerings with a particular focus on technology driven finance including Crowdfunding, Regulation A+ and Security Token Offerings. He routinely advises large financial institutions and both private and public companies on blockchain technology and as well as best practices in structuring operational and corporate data. Jonathan is the founder and principal of Dunsmoor Law, P.C.
    [Show full text]