The Efficient Team-Driven Quality Scholarship Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Collaborative Librarianship Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 10 6-7-2020 The Efficienteam-Driv T en Quality Scholarship Model: A Process Evaluation of Collaborative Research Johanna Alexander California State University, Bakersfield, [email protected] Andrea Anderson California State University, Bakersfield, [email protected] Sandra Bozarth California State University, Bakersfield, [email protected] Heather Cribbs California State University, Bakersfield, [email protected] Kristine Holloway California State University, Bakersfield, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship Part of the Scholarly Publishing Commons Recommended Citation Alexander, Johanna; Anderson, Andrea; Bozarth, Sandra; Cribbs, Heather; Holloway, Kristine; Livingston, Christopher; Overduin, Terezita; and Zhong, Ying (2020) "The Efficienteam-Driv T en Quality Scholarship Model: A Process Evaluation of Collaborative Research," Collaborative Librarianship: Vol. 12 : Iss. 1 , Article 10. Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol12/iss1/10 This Peer Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collaborative Librarianship by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. The Efficienteam-Driv T en Quality Scholarship Model: A Process Evaluation of Collaborative Research Cover Page Footnote Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank our colleague, Amanda Grombly, Library Collection Development and Management Coordinator at California State University Bakersfield and the editors and reviewers of Collaborative Librarianship for their valuable feedback. Authors Johanna Alexander, Andrea Anderson, Sandra Bozarth, Heather Cribbs, Kristine Holloway, Christopher Livingston, Terezita Overduin, and Ying Zhong This peer reviewed article is available in Collaborative Librarianship: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/ collaborativelibrarianship/vol12/iss1/10 Alexander et al.: The Efficient Team-Driven Quality Scholarship Model Peer Reviewed Article The Efficient Team-Driven Quality Scholarship Model: A Process Evaluation of Collaborative Research Johanna Alexander ([email protected]) Kristine Holloway ([email protected]) Librarian Emerita, Distance Services Coordinator and California State University, Bakersfield Antelope Valley Librarian California State University, Bakersfield Andrea Anderson ([email protected]) Library Instruction and First-Year Christopher Livingston ([email protected]) Experience Coordinator, Archives, Special Collections, Institutional California State University, Bakersfield Repository, and Digital Initiatives California State University, Bakersfield Sandra Bozarth ([email protected]) Chair, Instructional Technology, AL$ and Terezita Overduin (terezita.over- Reference Services Coordinator [email protected]) California State University, Bakersfield Reference Librarian Chaffey College Library Heather Cribbs ([email protected]) Electronic Resource Management Coordinator Ying Zhong ([email protected]) California State University, Bakersfield NSME & Web Services Librarian California State University, Bakersfield Abstract The Efficient Team-Driven Quality Scholarship (ETQS) Model is a research and writing system, providing strategies for librarians and other faculty to complete scholarly research within a set time frame. ETQS includes a team-driven, collaborative approach, predetermined timelines, built-in quality controls, and concurrent research processes. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the ETQS Model to overcome common research obstacles and promote research success factors. Using the process evaluation method, the authors use the research and writing of this article to assess the ETQS Model. Team member reflec- tions of the process are analyzed and ETQS strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) are evaluated and ameliorated. ETQS, in this case study, is effective in fostering scholarly productivity, pro- moting success factors, and overcoming obstacles. Utilization of this model could strengthen other collab- orative research efforts. Keywords: collaborative research, teams, process evaluation, SWOT analysis, scholarly productivity Collaborative Librarianship 12(1): 113-135 (2019) 113 Alexander et al.: The Efficient Team-Driven Quality Scholarship Model Introduction Literature Review The Efficient Team-Driven Quality Scholarship The ETQS Model connects established ap- (ETQS) Model is a collaborative research and proaches to research productivity to provide a writing system providing support, timesaving new paradigm. As background, the review of strategies, and synergy with the combined abili- the literature covers multiple areas including ob- ties of team members. The scholarly research stacles to and success factors for research and and writing process can be an arduous and publication success, collaborative and team re- drawn-out process, competing with other work search approaches, productive research and responsibilities, along with research interrup- writing methods, condensed research timelines, tions. The ETQS Model was developed as a other models with some comparisons to ETQS, framework to expedite the scholarly research and the process evaluation method. and writing process utilizing a collaborative team-approach. The ETQS Model was originally Obstacles & Success Factors labeled Power Publishing, later renamed to high- Expectations for scholarly research activity have light an efficient team-driven structure to pro- increased within the library and information sci- duce quality scholarship. ence (LIS) profession.1 Multiple authors in the Librarian and other faculty researchers need to LIS and other fields have studied the obstacles meet research and publication goals but face to faculty research and publication, while others competing time drains, interrupted projects and have investigated factors that promote or pre- momentum, and other obstacles that interfere dict faculty research success. These factors often with scholarly productivity. The literature offers are mirror images. LIS studies by Kennedy and a description of common obstacles, success fac- Brancolini, Hoffmann, Berg, and Koufogianna- tors, and strategies to address challenges faced kis, Kilobase and Clyde, Swanepoel, and Lessick 2 by researchers. This study evaluates the effec- et al. and broader faculty studies by Clapton, 3 tiveness of the ETQS Model to promote four suc- Amsberryaugier, Griffin, and Lee identify barri- cess factors for productive library and infor- ers to research productivity and all note research mation science research, writing, and publica- insufficiencies of time, training/education, expe- tion. These factors include: rience, skill, confidence, commitment, research community/mentoring, and institutional sup- • research time and momentum, port/resources. Time constraints are often cited • research skills and experience, by survey participants as one of the top chal- • self-confidence in the research process, lenges to research and publication, citing the and conflict between workload and the time and en- • a research community with peer-mentor- ergy needed for scholarly work.4 ing support and collaborative opportuni- Hadré et al. designed a study to measure what ties. motivates faculty to research and what factors ETQS consists of four aspects: increase productivity. The study queried faculty from a variety of disciplines at research univer- • a team-driven collaborative design, sities across the United States. The primary take- • a condensed timeline, aways of the study were that research effort and • built-in quality controls, and teaching load are the "two strongest predictors • concurrent scholarly research processes. of productivity."5 Teaching load is a negative Collaborative Librarianship 12(1): 113-135 (2019) 114 Alexander et al.: The Efficient Team-Driven Quality Scholarship Model predictor in that it creates a time barrier to re- of groups and collaboration on library research search.6 McGrail, Rickard, and Jones’ study re- productivity and developing a successful cul- garding interventions for increasing scholarly ture of research.13 publication discuss the problem of continuing project and writing momentum.7 Chase et al. Addressing the efficacy of a research commu- discuss the experiences of nursing faculty mak- nity, including research collaboration, team ap- ing time for research; acknowledging the "vari- proaches, and peer-mentoring, Lee and Bo- ous distractions that can derail productivity and zeman study the assumption of collaboration in- 14 decrease efficiency.”. They evaluate the chal- creasing publishing output. They maintain that lenges specifically related to time management, collaboration alone is not assurance of increased implicating the largest barrier as environmental effectiveness and there is a need for more exami- distractions involving “time drain” including nation into the factors that contribute to barriers. procrastination, attending to interruptions, and Cheruvelil et al. emphasizes the need for re- lack of discipline.8 Such insights are also perti- searchers to be committed to a common pur- 15 nent to LIS, which, like nursing, is a service ori- pose, approach, and performance goals. While ented and female dominated profession. collaboration should lend to mutual accountabil- ity, there is still a need