Practical China Tax and Finance Strategies Covering Tax and Finance Developments in China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Practical China Tax and Finance Strategies Covering Tax and Finance Developments in China Practical China Tax and Finance Strategies Covering Tax and Finance Developments in China June 2009 Volume 3, Number 6 China Issues Detailed IN THIS ISSUE Rules on Deductions for China EIT and Asset Losses China’s Ministry of Finance and State Asset Losses -- Administration of Taxation have jointly issued guidance on the ability to deduct New Incentives for Technology asset losses from the enterprise income tax. Companies New technology incentives are available to qualified enterprises located in 20 cities designated as China’s Outsourcing Model By Yongjun Peter Ni, Linda Ng, Jiang Bian and Cities. Page 1 Angel Wu (White Case, China) Controlled Foreign Corporations Detailed Rules on Deduction of Asset Losses Issued in China Under the new Enterprise Income Tax Law, the taxable income is de- The ‘place of actual management’ is a key fined as an enterprise’s total income minus the sum of non-taxable income, determinant on whether an enterprise will tax-exempt income, deductions and net operating loss carryovers. Deduc- be treated as a ‘resident enterprise.’ This is tions include costs, expenses, taxes, losses and other expenses. In order to critical to deferal if the taxpayer is subject provide detailed guidance on loss deduction, the Ministry of Finance and to tax on its worldwide income or is only subject to tax on China-sourced income. the State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”) have jointly issued circular Page 1 Caishui [2009] No 57, the Notice regarding Pre-tax Deduction of Asset Losses, Business in China See Asset Losses, page 11 China’s rating for contract enforcement is actually better than the United Kingdom and Japan. The key to enforcing contracts is knowing provisions that must be included. Chinese Controlled Foreign Page 3 Tax Free Reorganizations in China Corporations: China now has a set of rules providing for so-called “tax-free” (or actually tax-deferred) Actual Management Key to Residence corporate reorganizations.The new rules are Treatment based on the same fundamental principles as the U.S. tax rules regarding corporate By Patrice Marceau and Daniel Chan reorganizations. Page 6 (DLA Piper, China) Hong Kong Issues Guidance on Transfer Pricing Guoshuifa [2009] No. 82 issued by the SAT clarifies when Chinese- The increase in tax planning structures controlled foreign companies will be considered to have their ‘place involving companies located in tax haven of actual management’ in China. ‘Place of actual management’ is a key jurisdictions have heightened tax authorities’ determinant on whether an enterprise will be treated as a ‘resident en- awareness of the transfer pricing issue. terprise’ or ‘non resident enterprise’ which in turn arbitrates between Page 9 the taxpayer being subject to tax on its worldwide income and being subject to tax only on China-sourced income. Circular 82 is retroactive to January 1, 2008. Table of Contents TableSee of page Contents 2 See page 2 See Foreign Corporations, page 15 Contents China Issues Detailed Rules on Deductions for Asset Business in China: Misconceptions on Contract Losses—New Incentives for Technology Companies Enforcement and Chinese Debt Collection Practices By Yongjun Peter Ni, Linda Ng, Jiang Bian and By Dan Harris Angel Wu (Harris & Moure, PLLC, Seattle, Washington).....page 6 (White Case, China)...............................................page 1 Hong Kong and Transfer Pricing: DIPN 45 Provides Chinese Controlled Foreign Corporations: Actual Additional Guidance Management Key to Residence Treatment By Patrice Marceau and Daniel Chan By Patrice Marceau and Daniel Chan (DLA Piper, China)...................................................page 9 (DLA Piper, China).................................................page 1 New Tax Rules Regarding M&A Transactions in China By Lester Ross and Aileen Goa (Wilmer Hale, Bejing) ...........................................page 3 Published by: Practical China WorldTrade Executive, Tax and Finance Strategies a part of Thomson Reuters P.O. Box 761 Concord, MA 01742 Tel: 978-287-0301; Fax: 978-287-0302 Production Manager: Dana Pierce Website: www.wtexecutive.com Marketing: Jon Martel Publisher: Gary A. Brown, Esq. Editor: George Boerger, Esq. WorldTrade Executive TAX ADVISORY BOARD Richard E. Andersen, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP Yongjun (Peter) Ni, White & Case Sunghak Baik, Esq., Ernst & Young Antoine Paszkiewicz, Esq., Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (Paris) William C. Benjamin, Esq., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Cristian Rosso Alba, Esq., Rosso Alba, Francia & Ruiz Moreno (Buenos Aires) John I. Forry, Esq., University of Navarre (Spain) Daniel Rybnik, EnterPricing (Buenos Aires) Jaime González-Béndiksen Esq., Baker & McKenzie John A. Salerno, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Jorge Gross, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Michael J. Semes, Blank Rome LLP John M. Kelly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Dublin) Michael F. Swanick, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Marc Lewis, Sony USA Guillermo O. Teijeiro, Negri & Teijeiro Abogados Howard M. Liebman, Esq., Jones Day (Brussels) Miguel Valdés, Esq., Machado Associados Lisa C. Lim, Ernst & Young Pablo Wejcman, Esq., Ernst & Young Keith Martin, Esq., Chadbourne & Parke LLP PUBLISHED MONTHLY FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Reproduction or photocopying, even for personal or internal use, is prohibited without the publisher’s prior written consent. All rights reserved under the International and Pan–American Copyright Convention © 2009 Thomson Reuters © Thomson Reuters 2009 June 2009 New Tax Rules Regarding M&A Transactions in China By Lester Ross and Aileen Goa (Wilmer Hale, Beijing) On May 7, 2009, China’s Ministry of Finance all tax issues involved in corporate reorganiza- (the “MoF”) and State Administration of Taxa- tions—there are provisions on the treatment of tion (“SAT”) jointly issued the long-awaited tax attributes, several provisions are introduced Notice on Several Enterprise Income Tax Is- to guard the new freedom against abuse, and cer- sues Relating to Enterprise Reorganization tain loopholes are closed. The only major issues Activities, Caishui [2009] No. 59 (the “New related to reorganizations that are not addressed Reorganization Tax Rules”), and the Notice on in the New Reorganization Tax Rules are those Several Enterprise Income Tax Issues Relat- that are technically post-reorganization issues in ing to Enterprise Liquidation Activities, Cai- taxable acquisitions, and they are covered by the shui [2009] No. 60 (the “New Liquidation Tax New Liquidation Tax Rules. Rules”), both dated April 20, 2008, and effective retroactive to January 1, 2008. These rules mark a milestone in China’s tax reform: for the first For the first time, China now time, China now has a set of rules providing for so-called “tax-free” (actually tax-deferred) has a set of rules providing for corporate reorganizations. Before the promulgation of these new rules, so-called “tax-free” (actually corporate reorganizations were governed by one tax-deferred) corporate of two series of SAT circulars, one pertaining to domestic companies and the other to foreign- reorganizations. invested enterprises (“FIEs”). The series for FIEs consisted of Guoshuifa [1997] No. 71 (“Circular 71”) and Guoshuifa [1997] No. 207 (“Circular Summary and Analysis 207”). Circular 71 was intended to be a compre- The New Reorganization Tax Rules address hensive guideline on tax treatment of four types six types of reorganizations and prescribe two of M&A transactions: merger, division, equity types of tax treatment for them. The six transac- restructuring, and asset transfer. Circular 207 tion types include four types of M&A transac- specifically allowed a foreign investor to transfer tions—equity acquisition, asset acquisition, its equity interest in an FIE to a 100% owned sub- merger, and division—along with change of legal sidiary at cost (thus realizing zero gain), provided form and debt restructuring. A reorganization of that the transaction was motivated by a reason- each of these types is a taxable transaction unless able business purpose. Under those Circulars, it meets the requirements for a taxfree transac- many foreign investors were able to reorganize tion. This report focuses on M&A transactions. their China operations without significant tax consequences. However, the new Enterprise Taxable Transactions Income Tax Law, which unified the previously In a taxable M&A transaction, the target must separate tax regimes for domestic enterprises recognize gain or loss from the transfer of assets and FIEs, effectively repealed those Circulars as or the target shareholders must recognize gain of January 1, 2008. or loss from the transfer of their shares, and the A remarkable difference between the New purchaser takes the fair market value (in most Reorganization Tax Rules and the previous cases the purchase price) as its tax basis in the patchwork of SAT circulars is that the new rules equity or assets. Net operating losses (“NOLs”) are based on the same fundamental principles as may not be carried over to the purchaser (to the U.S. tax rules regarding corporate reorgani- offset its own tax liability). Surviving parties can zations. They also recognize a broader range of continue to enjoy their pre-existing tax holidays M&A and debt-restructuring transactions already (subject to proportional reduction in the case of common outside of China. The New Reorgani- a division), provided that they separately meet zation Tax Rules are also designed to address the qualification criteria. See New Tax Rules, page 4 Practical China Tax and Finance
Recommended publications
  • (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Carried Interest) Ordinance 2021 2021 年第 9 號條例 Ord
    《2021 年稅務 ( 修訂 ) ( 附帶權益的稅務寬減 ) 條例》 Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Carried Interest) Ordinance 2021 2021 年第 9 號條例 Ord. No. 9 of 2021 A182 A183 《2021 年稅務 ( 修訂 ) ( 附帶權益的稅務寬減 ) 條例》 Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Carried Interest) Ordinance 2021 目錄 Contents 條次 頁次 Section Page 1. 簡稱 ........................................................................................ A186 1. Short title ................................................................................ A187 2. 修訂《稅務條例》 ..................................................................... A186 2. Inland Revenue Ordinance amended ...................................... A187 3. 修訂第 2 條 ( 釋義 ) ................................................................ A188 3. Section 2 amended (interpretation) ......................................... A189 4. 修訂第 4 條 ( 公事保密 ) ......................................................... A188 4. Section 4 amended (official secrecy) ....................................... A189 5. 修訂經《2020 年稅務 ( 修訂 ) ( 與保險有關的業務的利 5. Section 19CA (as amended by section 7 of the Inland 得稅寬減) 條 例》(2020 年第15 號 ) 第 7 條修訂的第 Revenue (Amendment) (Profits Tax Concessions for 19CA 條 ( 根據第 19CAB 及 19CAC 條對未吸納虧損的 Insurance-related Businesses) Ordinance 2020 (15 of 處理:釋義 ) ........................................................................... A188 2020)) amended (treatment of unabsorbed losses under 6. 修訂第 20AN 條 ( 某些基金的某些利潤獲豁免繳付利得 sections 19CAB and 19CAC: interpretation) .......................... A189 稅 ) .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Shipping Register and Shipping Tax Regime in Hong Kong Contents
    Guide to Shipping Register and Shipping Tax Regime in Hong Kong Contents The Hong Kong Shipping Register 1 Taxation of Shipping Profits in Hong Kong 8 Schedule 12 The Hong Kong Shipping Register Until 3 December 1990, the United Kingdom Merchant Shipping Acts (the “Acts”) (except for the Merchant Shipping Act 1988) applied to registration of ships and to mortgages of ships in Hong Kong. A ship registered at the Port of Hong Kong was, therefore, a British ship. Hong Kong reverted to Chinese sovereignty on 1 July 1997 and became a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Section VIII of Annex I to the Sino- British Joint Declaration which relates to the transfer of sovereignty states that: “The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall maintain Hong Kong’s previous systems of shipping management and shipping regulation, including the system for regulating conditions of seamen. The specific functions and responsibilities of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government in the field of shipping shall be defined by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government on its own. Private shipping businesses and shipping-related businesses and private container terminals in Hong Kong may continue to operate freely. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be authorised by the Central People’s Government to continue to maintain a shipping register and issue related certificates under its own legislation in the name of ‘Hong Kong, China’.” The Hong Kong Government appointed a Steering Committee in 1987 to advise the Government on the establishment of an independent shipping registry. The result was enacted as the Merchant Shipping (Registration) Ordinance (Cap 415) (the “Ordinance”), which came into effect on 3 December 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance 2021 Contents
    《2021 年稅務 ( 修訂 ) ( 雜項條文 ) 條例》 Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance 2021 2021 年第 18 號條例 Ord. No. 18 of 2021 A2100 A2101 《2021 年稅務 ( 修訂 ) ( 雜項條文 ) 條例》 Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance 2021 目錄 Contents 條次 頁次 Section Page 第 1 部 Part 1 導言 Preliminary 1. 簡稱 ...................................................................................... A2108 1. Short title .............................................................................. A2109 2. 修訂《稅務條例》 ................................................................... A2110 2. Inland Revenue Ordinance amended .................................... A2111 第 2 部 Part 2 關乎合資格合併的修訂 Amendments relating to Qualifying Amalgamations 3. 加入第 6C 部 ........................................................................ A2112 3. Part 6C added ....................................................................... A2113 第 6C 部 Part 6C 合資格合併 Qualifying Amalgamations 40AE. 釋義 .................................................................... A2112 40AE. Interpretation ...................................................... A2113 40AF. 第 6C 部的適用範圍 ........................................... A2116 40AF. Application of Part 6C ....................................... A2117 40AG. 參與合併公司視為已停止經營某行業、專業 40AG. Amalgamating company treated as having 或業務 ................................................................. A2116 ceased to carry on trade, profession or 40AH. 參與合併公司的暫繳利得稅 .............................. A2116 business ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Tax Weekly Newsletter
    KPMG Asia Pacific Tax Weekly KPMG Asia Pacific Tax Centre | 8 April 2021 Asia Pacific Tax Developments Australia Guidance on claiming temporary full expensing and loss carryback The Australian Taxation Office issued guidance for businesses claiming temporary full expensing and loss carryback in their 2020-21 tax returns. New measures concerning casual employment; action steps for employers New measures in Australia amend existing employment legislation with regard to “casual employment.” No further extension of financial reporting deadlines (COVID-19) The Australian Securities and Investments Commission announced that it is not currently intending to extend the deadline for filing financial reports for balance dates after 7 January 2021. R&D tax incentive (Full Federal Court) The Full Federal Court in a case concerning the interpretation of section 8AAZN of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) (TAA 1953) as to what constitutes an administrative overpayment held for the government in a case concerning a claim for research and development tax incentive. © 2021 Copyright owned by one or more of the KPMG International entities. KPMG International entities provide no services to clients. All rights reserved. 1 Synthesised text of income tax treaty with Indonesia The Australian Taxation Office released synthesised text of the multilateral instrument and Australia’s income tax treaty with Indonesia. Hong Kong (SAR), China Hong Kong extends profits tax concession for certain insurance businesses The enhanced tax concession came into effect on 19 March 2021, providing a concessionary tax rate of 8.25% on income for certain insurance-related businesses conducting business in Hong Kong provided certain thresholds are met.
    [Show full text]
  • Departmental Interpretation and Practice Notes No. 43 (Revised)
    Inland Revenue Department The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China DEPARTMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICE NOTES NO. 43 (REVISED) PROFITS TAX PROFITS TAX EXEMPTION FOR OFFSHORE FUNDS These notes are issued for the information of taxpayers and their tax representatives. They contain the Department’s interpretation and practices in relation to the laws as it stood at the date of publication. Taxpayers are reminded that their right of objection against the assessment and their right of appeal to the Commissioner, the Board of Review or the Court are not affected by the application of these notes. These notes replace those issued in February 2010. WONG Kuen-fai Commissioner of Inland Revenue May 2016 Our web site : www.ird.gov.hk DEPARTMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICE NOTES No. 43 (Revised) CONTENT Paragraph Introduction 1 Background Before the 2006 Ordinance 4 The 2006 Ordinance 6 The 2015 Ordinance 7 Resident person / Non-resident person 8 Individuals 9 Non-individual entities 12 Central management and control 13 Split year residence 21 The Exemption Provisions Exemption criteria 22 Scope of Exemption 23 Specified Transactions 24 Transaction in securities 26 Transaction in futures contracts 29 Transaction in foreign exchange contracts 32 Transaction consisting in the making of a deposit other than by 33 way of a money-lending business Transaction in foreign currencies 34 Transaction in exchange-traded commodities 35 Incidental transactions 36 Specified person 39 Loss from exempt
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Revenue Department 60Th Anniversary
    Miscellaneous Inland Revenue Department 60th Anniversary IRD celebrates its 60th anniversary in 2007–08. Let us go into the time tunnel to revisit the history of the Department in the past 60 years: Commissioners of Inland Revenue Name Duration Mr E W PUDNEY 1.1.1947 – 1.2.1951 Mr W F WATSON, O.B.E. 2.2.1951 – 26.5.1957 Mr W J DRYSDALE 1.4.1958 – 15.7.1963 Mr A D DUFFY, O.B.E. 16.7.1963 – 11.5.1972 Mr F E RAINBOW, O.B.E. 12.5.1972 – 26.1.1975 Mr R V GIDDY, C.B.E. (1979) 27.1.1975 – 19.9.1979 Mr V A LADD, C.B.E. 20.9.1979 – 31.7.1985 Mr Anthony AU-YEUNG FU, O.B.E. (1989), C.B.E. (1997), J.P. 1.8.1985 – 23.4.1996 Mr WONG Ho-sang, J.P. 24.4.1996 – 18.8.1999 Mrs LAU MAK Yee-ming, Alice, J.P. Since 1.3.2001 Revenue Collection and Cost of Collection IRD Revenue Collection ($m) 250,000 200,697 200,000 150,000 137,515 100,000 50,000 34,349 14 185 616 4,372 0 1947–48 1957–58 1967–68 1977–78 1987–88 1997–98 2007–08 Costs per 100 Dollars of Revenue $3.61 $1.97 $1.55 $1.24 $1.17 $0.81 $0.58 Inland Revenue Department Annual Report 2007–08 47 Inland Revenue Department 60th Anniversary IRD Departmental Grades Number and Ratio of Male and Female Staff 1,600 1,400 1,200 373:796 1,000 245:716 800 348:375 284:394 373:262 600 400 248:84 255 200 138 104:27 119:2 68:35 54:1 48:2 50 39:1 27:0 23:1 15:1 18:0 10:1 1:0 0 A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C 1947–48 1957–58 1967–68 1977–78 1987–88 1997–98 2007–08 A : Assessor Grade B : Inspector Grade C : Taxation Officer Grade Sex Ratio (Male : Female) Non departmental grades are not included ¢ Male ¢ Female
    [Show full text]
  • Departmental Interpretation and Practice Notes No. 61 Profits Tax
    Inland Revenue Department The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China DEPARTMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICE NOTES NO. 61 PROFITS TAX PROFITS TAX EXEMPTION FOR FUNDS These notes are issued for the information of taxpayers and their tax representatives. They contain the Department’s interpretation and practices in relation to the laws as it stood at the date of publication. Taxpayers are reminded that their right of objection against the assessment and their right of appeal to the Commissioner, the Board of Review or the Court are not affected by the application of these notes. WONG Kuen-fai Commissioner of Inland Revenue June 2020 Our web site : www.ird.gov.hk DEPARTMENTAL INTERPRETATION AND PRACTICE NOTES No. 61 CONTENT Paragraph Introduction Public and private funds 1 Fund domiciliation 4 Transfers of interests in funds 6 Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act 7 Common Reporting Standard 11 Transfer pricing 14 Tax Regimes Relating to Funds Fund regime (on or after 1 April 2019) 16 Offshore fund regime (up to 31 March 2019) 19 Offshore private equity fund regime (up to 31 March 2019) 23 Open-ended fund company regime (from 30 July 2018 to 31 March 2019) 24 Co-investment partner funds under ITVF Scheme 27 Fund Regime Legal framework 29 Commencement date 32 What Fund Means Meaning of fund – Encompassed concepts 35 – Arrangement in respect of property 36 – Managed as a whole requirement 38 – Pooling requirement 42 – Separate pools of assets and different classes of interests 46 – No day-to-day
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Brief
    File Reference: ENB CR 1/3231/19 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BRIEF Inland Revenue Ordinance (Chapter 112) Business Registration Ordinance (Chapter 310) EXEMPTION FROM PROFITS TAX (FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) ORDER BUSINESS REGISTRATION (AMENDMENT) REGULATION 2019 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the Government’s policy to promote renewable energy (“RE”) in Hong Kong, we encourage individuals to install RE systems at their residential premises under the Feed-in Tariff (“FiT”) Scheme and would simplify the relevant procedures as far as possible in order to facilitate their participation. In this connection, we are putting forward legislative amendments to exempt these individuals from relevant business registration requirements and taxation obligations. 2. At the meeting of the Executive Council on 10 December 2019, the Council ADVISED and the Chief Executive ORDERED that the Exemption from Profits Tax (Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Order (“the Exemption Order”), at Annex A, should be made by the Chief Executive in Council (“CE-in-C”) pursuant to section 87 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (“IRO”); and the Business Registration (Amendment) Regulation 2019 (“the Amendment Regulation”), at Annex B, should be made by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury (SFST) pursuant to section 14(1A)(g) of the Business Registration Ordinance (“BRO”) to exempt individuals who install RE systems at their residential premises from – (a) the payment of profits tax in respect of their income derived from selling electricity generated by such systems to the relevant power companies under the FiT Scheme; and (b) the provisions of the BRO in respect of their FiT businesses. JUSTIFICATIONS The FiT Scheme 3. The FiT Scheme is a strong financial incentive for private investment in RE because the power generated can be sold to the power companies at rates1 higher than the normal electricity tariff rate, which can help recover the costs of investment, operation and maintenance in around 10 years2.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposals to Extend Offshore Private Equity Fund Tax Exemption to Hong Kong Businesses
    FSDC Paper No. 32 Proposals to Extend Offshore Private Equity Fund Tax Exemption to Hong Kong Businesses July 2017 Index Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 I. Background ............................................................................................................... 4 II. Limitations of the Current Rules on Offshore PE Fund Exemption ......................... 8 Expansion of the offshore fund exemption to non-Hong Kong PE investment ...... 10 Restriction on investment into Hong Kong private companies .............................. 11 Restrictions on SPV functionality ........................................................................... 13 Considerations for expanding the offshore fund exemption to investment in Hong Kong businesses ...................................................................................................... 14 III. Recommendations / Proposals ............................................................................... 17 Excepted private company (“EPC”) – call for an expanded definition .................. 17 Special purpose vehicle – call for an expanded definition ...................................... 19 Tainting – call for a relaxation ................................................................................ 20 Anti-tax avoidance .................................................................................................. 21 Other comments / considerations ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Taxation in Hong Kong
    SUMMARY OF TAXATION IN Ms. Karen Kaur HONG KONG 1 Contents Preface 03 Overview of 04 Hong Kong Taxation Main Taxes •Profits Tax •Salaries Tax •Property Tax•Stamp Duty •Custom Duty 05 Main Tax Issues • Holder of Provisional Tax •llegal Declaring Dutiable Goods and Its Penalty 17 •Advance Ruling •Personal Assessment Cross Border Tax Issues • Avoidance of Double Taxation •Offshore Claim •International Tax on Inbound Investment 20 •International Tax on Outbound Investment Taxation’s Service Scope 21 Contact Us 24 2 Preface The Journal is formulated on the basis of Hong Kong’s current tax legislation, public in- formation of HKIRD, and tax relief measures for 2019/2020 Hong Kong Budget. We hope the Journal will help investors under- stand more about Hong Kong’s tax environ- ment of “simplicity and low tax rate”, so that they can expand their business by taking ad- vantage of the Hong Kong platform. As a summary, the Journal explains the tax legislation of Hong Kong only in an extensive manner. For detailed information and consul- tation, please contact us. 3 Overview of Hong Kong Taxation Hong Kong is acclaimed for low tax rates and few tax types. At present, its taxes, only include profits tax, salaries tax, property tax, stamp duty, and customs duty (applicable to a few commodity categories).The current Inland Revenue Ordinance of Hong Kong is under heavy influence of the UK Legal System. Ever since its first promulgation in 1947, Censorship Review Com- mittee had been established for many times, desiring to reform Hong Kong taxation. As of today, Hong Kong taxation, however, has not been adjusted on a large scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Profits Tax's Chargeability Is Determined According to The
    Answer-to-Question-_1_ (1) Hong Kong profits tax’s chargeability is determined according to the Inland Revenue Ordinance (“IRO”), where section 14(1) states that a person carrying on trade, business or profession in Hong Kong is chargeable to profits tax for the profits derived from or arisen in Hong Kong (excluding capital gains). Based on the facts given, Muffin HK Ltd (MHKL) was incorporated in Hong Kong and it carries on a business in distributing dairy products in both Hong Kong and mainland China. As such, it is considered “carrying on trade/business in Hong Kong”, satisfying the first condition of section 14(1) of the IRO. To determine the locality of the sales income, the Inland Revenue Department (“IRD”) of Hong Kong uses the “contract effected test” as guided by DIPN No 21 (Revised) for sales profits being a kind of trading profits. No apportionment is allowed. In the simplest understanding, if either one of an entity’s contract of purchase or contract of sales is effected in Hong Kong, the relevant sales profits will be fully subject to Hong Kong profits tax. It is worth noting that in MHKL’s case, its related PRC-incorporated company Ready China Ltd (RCL) is responsible for attracting business and negotiating with customers in mainland China on MHKL’s behalf. Therefore, MHKL’s contracts of sales to customers in mainland China are in fact effected outside Hong Kong (i.e. in mainland China). Then we have to consider the contracts of purchase as well. As given, MHKL purchases products from Japanese and Korean suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Brief
    File Ref: FIN CR 1/10/2041/46 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BRIEF Inland Revenue Ordinance (Chapter 112) INLAND REVENUE (DOUBLE TAXATION RELIEF AND PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND CAPITAL GAINS) (UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND) ORDER INTRODUCTION At the meeting of the Executive Council on 28 September 2010, the Council ADVISED and the Chief Executive ORDERED that the Inland Revenue (Double Taxation Relief and Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and Capital Gains) (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) Order (“the Order”), at A Annex A, should be made under section 49(1A) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance, Cap. 112 (“the Ordinance”). The Order implements the Agreement between the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“HKSAR”) and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“the UK”) for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital Gains signed on 21 June 2010 (“the UK Agreement”). JUSTIFICATIONS Benefits of Comprehensive Agreements for Avoidance of Double Taxation 2. Double taxation refers to the imposition of comparable taxes in more than one tax jurisdiction in respect of the same source of income. The international community generally recognises that double taxation hinders the exchange of goods and services, movements of capital, technology and human resources, and poses an obstacle to the development of economic relations between economies. As a business facilitation initiative, it is our policy to enter into Comprehensive Agreements for Avoidance of Double Taxation (“CDTAs”) with our trading and investment partners so as to minimise double taxation.
    [Show full text]