Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2007 No. 43 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. and was our war in Iraq with benchmarks and tary strategy,’’ adding, ‘‘By interfering called to order by the Speaker pro tem- deadlines for withdrawal is a prescrip- with the discretion of the Commander pore (Mr. MEEKS of New York). tion for retreat and defeat. in Chief and military leaders in order Common sense and the Constitution f to fulfill domestic political needs, Con- teach us that Congress can declare war. gress undermines whatever prospects DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Congress can fund or choose not to remain of a successful outcome.’’ TEMPORE fund war. But Congress must not ever And even in today’s Washington The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- attempt to conduct war. I urge my col- Post, another lion of the liberal media fore the House the following commu- leagues on both sides of the aisle to in America, under the lead editorial nication from the Speaker: heed the call of the Constitution and headline, The Pelosi Plan for Iraq, they common sense and reject the Pelosi write: WASHINGTON, DC, plan for retreat and defeat in Iraq. March 13, 2007. ‘‘In short, the Democrat proposal to It turns out, Mr. Speaker, that I am I hereby appoint the Honorable GREGORY be taken up this week is an attempt to W. MEEKS to act as Speaker pro tempore on actually not alone in my concern about impose detailed management on a war this day. the constitutionality and the common- without regard to the war itself.’’ NANCY PELOSI, sense value of the current plan for The Washington Post adds: ‘‘Con- Speaker of the House of Representatives. withdrawal from Iraq being propounded gress should rigorously monitor the f by the majority. The newspaper of Iraqi government’s progress on those record in the home State of Speaker benchmarks. By Mr. Bush’s own ac- MORNING HOUR DEBATES PELOSI, the Los Angeles Times, wrote count, the purpose of the troop surge in The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- an editorial yesterday under the title Iraq is to enable political process. If ant to the order of the House of Janu- ‘‘Do We Really Need a General Pelosi?’’ progress does not occur, the military ary 4, 2007, the Chair will now recog- adding ‘‘Congress can cut funding for strategy should be reconsidered.’’ nize Members from lists submitted by Iraq, but it shouldn’t micromanage the But here is the key line in the Wash- the majority and minority leaders for war.’’ Allow me to quote further from ington Post lead editorial today: ‘‘But morning hour debates. The Chair will yesterday’s lead editorial in the Los aggressive oversight is quite different alternate recognition between the par- Angeles Times: from mandating military steps accord- ‘‘After weeks of internal strife, House ties, with each party limited to not to ing to an inflexible timetable con- Democrats have brought forth their exceed 30 minutes, and each Member, forming to the need to capture votes in proposal for forcing President Bush to except the majority leader, the minor- Congress or at the 2008 polls.’’ withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq by 2008. ity leader, or the minority whip, lim- It is truly extraordinary how politics The plan is an unruly mess: bad public ited to not to exceed 5 minutes. and common sense and the Constitu- policy, bad precedent and bad politics. The Chair recognizes the gentleman tion can make such strange bedfellows. If the legislation passes, Bush says from Indiana (Mr. PENCE) for 5 min- I scarcely think, Mr. Speaker, that I utes. he’ll veto it, as well he should.’’ The Los Angeles Times editorial have ever come to the floor of this f board went on: House and quoted at any length the lead editorial in either the Washington IRAQ ‘‘It was one thing for the house to pass a nonbinding vote of disapproval. Post or the Los Angeles Times. Those Mr. PENCE. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s quite another for it to set out a de- two newspapers tend to bookend the By the end of 2006, most Americans tailed timetable with specific bench- country from a liberal perspective in could see that our strategy in Iraq was marks and conditions for the continu- the media. But in both cases, both not working. In January of this year, ation of the conflict.’’ newspapers have identified what I as- President Bush outlined his plan to win The L.A. Times asked, ‘‘Imagine if serted in the beginning, that my col- the war in Iraq. And just last week, Dwight Eisenhower had been forced to leagues should heed the call of the Con- Speaker PELOSI and the Democrat ma- adhere to a congressional war plan in stitution and common sense and reject jority announced their plan to end the scheduling the Normandy landings or the Pelosi plan for retreat and defeat war in Iraq. The only problem with if, in 1863, President Lincoln had been in Iraq. that, Mr. Speaker, is that, as George forced by Congress to conclude the It is the purview of the Congress to Orwell wrote, the quickest way to end Civil War by the following year.’’ declare war. It is the purview of this the war is to lose it, and I believe that They conclude, ‘‘This is the worst Congress to vote up or down on wheth- the Democratic plan to micromanage kind of congressional meddling in mili- er we should continue to fund military b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H2439 . VerDate Aug 31 2005 01:09 Mar 14, 2007 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A13MR7.000 H13MRPT1 hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMHOUSE H2440 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE March 13, 2007 operations. And I would never question ago voted on a resolution that said I would point out that in the supple- that right. But it is not the purview of that the escalation and the surge was a mental appropriations bill, we do pro- the Congress, according to our history mistake, that we are opposed to that. vide more money for this effort, be- and Constitution and tradition, to And so there has to be some effort in cause the Democratic leadership, as interpose our will, our decisions, our this spending bill, which is our prerog- Speaker PELOSI realized, that we are timetables, on military commanders in ative, to indicate why the war has gone neglecting the war in Afghanistan the field. in the wrong direction and what needs where the terrorists began. Let’s I will close, Mr. Speaker, by simply to be done to end it and ultimately get refocus on that. But this supplemental saying that we do have but one choice our troops out of there. That is what bill is the answer to the problem and it in Iraq and that is victory. It is my we are doing as Democrats and I be- brings us in a new direction. hope and prayer that after much polit- lieve we will have a consensus to f ical debate here in Congress, we will achieve that and I think that it will give our soldiers the resources they lead in a very short period of time to ENERGY SECURITY need to achieve victory in Iraq and us getting out of Iraq and leaving the The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- bring home a much-deserved freedom Iraqis to decide their own fate. It is ant to the order of the House of Janu- for those good people and another vic- time for that at this time. We ary 4, 2007, the gentleman from Florida tory for freedom for the American peo- shouldn’t be sending the resources and (Mr. STEARNS) is recognized during ple. we shouldn’t be sending our soldiers morning hour debates for 5 minutes. f into a situation where they no longer Mr. STEARNS. Mr. Speaker, on Sep- belong. tember 19, 2002, in a Wall Street Jour- TIME TO REFOCUS EFFORTS IN My intention today was to come to nal editorial, former CIA Director THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM the floor and talk about, rather than James Woolsey described the central The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- sending our soldiers to Iraq and all the challenge we face in the global war on ant to the order of the House of Janu- resources we are sending to Iraq, that terrorism as the United States’ depend- ary 4, 2007, the gentleman from New we should be focusing more on Afghani- ence on imported oil. My colleagues, Jersey (Mr. PALLONE) is recognized stan, because that’s where the Taliban this dependence is providing our enemy during morning hour debates for 5 min- were and they continue to be. That is with so much leverage that defeating utes. where al Qaeda began and continues to terrorism has become significantly Mr. PALLONE. Thank you, Mr. exist, including those who were in harder. Speaker. charge of al Qaeda. And we are not Let me quote from Mr. Woolsey: ‘‘We Mr. Speaker, my intention this doing enough in Afghanistan. There is are at war. We should start by asking morning was to come here and talk a new offensive now on the part of the what we can do as soon as possible to about the need to refocus our efforts in Taliban which began last month in undercut our enemies’ power.
Recommended publications
  • Session from Hell by Arnold Hamilton These Are the Raw Numbers: the Lawmakers Consider Sacrosanct: Cor- Legislature’S 101 House Members Porate Welfare
    $2.50 25,000 Blue Chip Readers VOL. 42, NO. 2 An Independent Journal of Commentary JANUARY 25, 2010 Wingnuts And Corporatists Session From Hell By Arnold Hamilton These are the raw numbers: The lawmakers consider sacrosanct: cor- Legislature’s 101 House members porate welfare. and 48 senators filed 2,235 bills and The state has created a cornucopia 59 resolutions in advance of the 2010 of tax exemptions – including sales session that opens Feb. 1. taxes on newspapers – that benefit Toss in the 1,051 bills and 86 res- the supposedly free-market Chamber olutions left over from last year and crowd. When GOP Sen. Mike Mazzei lawmakers could take up as many as of Tulsa tried to repeal them and start 3,431 measures this year – or one for over, he discovered neither Republi- just about every little Oklahoma town cans nor Democrats were much inter- the size of Medford or Fairland, Wister ested in disappointing wealthy busi- or Hydro. ness interests and deep-pocketed As impressive – or depressing – as campaign donors. the sheer magnitude of legislative Don’t be surprised if the GOP lead- creativity may be, there’s really only ership targets education, despite lip one number that is important to know service to the contrary. The corporat- heading into this session: 1.3 billion. ists in charge are not beyond using That’s the size of the projected hole the crisis to attempt to bring their – in dollars – in the 2010-11 budget, arch-enemies, the state’s teachers down from a $7.1 billion spending unions, to their knees.
    [Show full text]
  • A Growing Diversity
    A Growing Diversity 1993–2017 In late April 1975, eight-year-old Anh (Joseph) Cao’s long and improbable odyssey to the halls of Congress began as North Vietnamese communists seized the southern capital city of Saigon.1 The trajectory of the soft-spoken, bookish Cao toward Capitol Hill stands out as one of the most remarkable in the modern era, even as it neatly encapsulated post-1965 Asian immigration patterns to the United States. Still, the origins of Cao’s story were commonplace. For three decades, conflict and civil war enveloped his country. After the Vietnamese threw off the yoke of French colonialism following World War II, a doomed peace accord in 1954 removed the French military and partitioned Vietnam. The new government in South Vietnam aligned with Western world powers, while North Vietnam allied with communist states. Amid the Cold War, the U.S. backed successive Saigon regimes against communist insurgents before directly intervening in 1965. A massive ground and air war dragged on inconclusively for nearly a decade. More than 58,000 American troops were killed, and more than three million South and North Vietnamese perished.2 Public opposition in the United States eventually forced an end to the intervention. America’s decision to withdraw from Vietnam shattered Joseph Cao’s family just as it did many thousands of others as communist forces soon swamped the ineffectual government and military in the South. In 2011 Japanese-American veterans received the Congressional Gold Medal for their valor during World War II. The medal included the motto of the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, “Go for Broke.” Nisei Soldiers of World War II Congressional Gold Medal Obverse © 2011 United States Mint 42940_08-APA-CE3.indd 436 2/13/2018 12:04:16 PM 42940_08-APA-CE3.indd 437 2/13/2018 12:04:17 PM Just days before Saigon fell, Cao’s mother, Khang Thi Tran, spirited one of her daughters and two sons, including Anh, to a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suburbanization of the Democratic Party, 1992–2018
    The Suburbanization of the Democratic Party, 1992–2018 David A. Hopkins Boston College [email protected] Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 29, 2019. 1 Abstract Over the past three decades, the Democratic Party has become mostly suburban in both the residence of party supporters in the mass public and the composition of its congressional caucus. This transformation reflects migration patterns among American citizens, partisan shifts among some suburban voters, and a serious relative decline over time in the party’s rural strength. The trend of suburbanization has made the party’s elected officials more ideologically unified, especially on cultural issues, but it also works to preclude the partywide adoption of an ambitious left-wing economic agenda. Suburbanization has occurred alongside a growth in the racial heterogeneity of the Democratic mass membership and elite leadership alike, encouraged by the demographic diversification of American suburbs. Democratic suburban growth has been especially concentrated in the nation’s largest metropolitan areas, reflecting the combined presence of both relatively liberal whites (across education levels) and substantial minority populations, but suburbs elsewhere remain decidedly, even increasingly, Republican in their collective partisan alignment. Rather than stimulating a broad national pro-Democratic backlash across suburban communities in general, as is sometimes suggested by political observers, the election of Donald Trump has instead further magnified this existing divergence—leaving American suburbia, like the nation itself, closely and deeply divided between the two major parties. Introduction Political analysts, including academics, are fond of describing the current era of American politics as primarily distinguished by deep and stable partisan loyalties.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Maximizing Documentation of the Legislative Process
    I. MAXIMIZING DOCUMENTATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS I. A. Committee Records The responsibility to document the activities of Congress and pre- serve records that are of use to Senate and House committees pre- sents a serious challenge in the modern “information age.” Congressional staff, scholars, and archivists all recognize that the fragmentation and dispersal of congressional records inhibit the coordinated records management and archiving of records that are necessary for the present and future study of Congress. Although committees maintain and preserve their official records in greater quantity today than in the past, the quality and completeness of this documentation has yet to be established. Unpublished records cre- ated within the last two or three decades (depending on Senate or House access rules) have not been described systematically by the Center for Legislative Archives staff because they are still closed to research. The mounting volume of records and the demise of cen- tralized filing systems within committee offices, coupled with the increasing use of modern information technologies, have raised the concern that the records may not sufficiently document the legisla- tive process and the history of today’s Congress. This issue concerns committees as users of their own records as well as future researchers. To address these concerns, the Advisory Committee asks the Center for Legislative Archives to undertake a systematic archival description of modern committee records series in order to assess the informational value of the records preserved. The Center should report its findings to the Advisory Committee at the 1996 fall meet- ing in preparation for a full discussion of modern record-keeping practices in Congress and an exploration of the appropriate mea- sures to ensure that the legislative process is fully documented in the official records of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Contingent Election of the President and Vice President by Congress: Perspectives and Contemporary Analysis
    Contingent Election of the President and Vice President by Congress: Perspectives and Contemporary Analysis Updated October 6, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R40504 Contingent Election of the President and Vice President by Congress Summary The 12th Amendment to the Constitution requires that presidential and vice presidential candidates gain “a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed” in order to win election. With a total of 538 electors representing the 50 states and the District of Columbia, 270 electoral votes is the “magic number,” the arithmetic majority necessary to win the presidency. What would happen if no candidate won a majority of electoral votes? In these circumstances, the 12th Amendment also provides that the House of Representatives would elect the President, and the Senate would elect the Vice President, in a procedure known as “contingent election.” Contingent election has been implemented twice in the nation’s history under the 12th Amendment: first, to elect the President in 1825, and second, the Vice President in 1837. In a contingent election, the House would choose among the three candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each state, regardless of population, casts a single vote for President in a contingent election. Representatives of states with two or more Representatives would therefore need to conduct an internal poll within their state delegation to decide which candidate would receive the state’s single vote. A majority of state votes, 26 or more, is required to elect, and the House must vote “immediately” and “by ballot.” Additional precedents exist from 1825, but they would not be binding on the House in a contemporary election.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCLASSIFIED US Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc
    Obtained via FOIA by Judicial Watch, Inc. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162980 Date: 09/26/2018 Re: Office of Civil Rights To: Cheryl Mills RELEASE IN PART 86 86 Subject: Re: Office of Civil Rights He could but I doubt he would. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162980 Date: 09/26/2018 Obtained via FOIA by Judicial Watch, Inc. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162981 Date: 09/26/2018 Can I call Harold Koh and Eric Goosby? To: Cheryl Mills ...______ ____, RELEASE IN PART 86 B6 Subject: Can I call Harold Koh and Eric Goosby? I'll be home in ten minutes if you want to talk. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162981 Date: 09/26/2018 Obtained via FOIA by Judicial Watch, Inc. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162982 Date: 09/26/2018 Office of Civil Rights From: Cheryl Mills RELEASE IN PART 86 86 To: Hillary Clinton [email protected] Subject: Office of Civil Rights Before I mention to D as something perhaps worth exploring- do you think this is a role he can fulfill? Office of Civil Rights At the Department of State, diversity is not just aworthy cause: it is abusiness necessity. Diversity of experience and background helps Department employees in the work of diplomacy. The Secretary believes that diversity is extremely important in making the State Department an employer of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Tracy Hager 303.764.4090 [email protected] or Stephanie Moore 216.430.2939 [email protected] BakerHostetler Adds Bipartisan Senior Advisors to Expanding Federal Policy Team Former United States Congressman Heath Shuler and government affairs veteran Jim Murphy bolster the firm’s respected Washington team WASHINGTON — Jan. 5, 2017 — BakerHostetler today announced that it has added bipartisan team members, former Congressman Heath Shuler, D-N.C., and government affairs consultant James Murphy, as senior advisors to the growing roster of the firm’s Federal Policy team. Led by former U.S. Congressman Michael Ferguson, who joined the firm in June, Shuler and Murphy join a distinguished team of former government officials and senior advisors in the Washington office. “No matter which party leads Washington, generating bipartisan support for our clients’ initiatives in Congress is critically important,” Ferguson said. “Heath enjoyed a solid record of accomplishment in Congress, working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle, and he adds significant depth to BakerHostetler’s existing bipartisan government affairs capabilities. Jim’s longtime experience, both in Washington and in numerous states, furthers BakerHostetler’s reach and our ability to serve clients’ federal and state government affairs needs.” Shuler Shuler served as a member of Congress for six years, representing North Carolina’s 11th Congressional District from 2007 to 2013, where he was the Democratic Caucus senior whip. He also served as the co-chair and coalition whip to the fiscal conservative caucus the Blue Dog Coalition, co-chaired the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Congressional Caucus, and was founder and co-chair of the House Professional Sports Caucus.
    [Show full text]
  • X RIMYLAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, PROJECT Index No
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X RIMYLAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, PROJECT Index No. APPLECART, LLC, TORMIMA, LLC, and MININO PRODUCTIONS, LLC, COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, -against- NO LABELS, INC., FORWARD NOT BACK, INC., UNITED FOR PROGRESS, INC., UNITED TOGETHER, INC., CITIZENS FOR A STRONG AMERICA, INC., GOVERN OR GO HOME, INC., AMERICANS COMMITTED FOR PROGRESS, INC., CITIZENS FOR AMERICA, INC., PROGRESS TOGETHER, INC., PATRIOTIC AMERICANS PAC, INC., NO LABELS ACTION, INC., PROGRESS TOMORROW, INC., and NANCY JACOBSON, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X Rimylan Enterprises, LLC (“Rimylan”), Project Applecart, LLC (“PAL”), Tormima, LLC (“Tormima”), and Minino Productions, LLC (“Minino”) by their undersigned counsel, as and for their Complaint against Defendants No Labels, Inc. (“No Labels”), Forward Not Back, Inc. (“Forward Not Back”), United For Progress, Inc. (“United For Progress”), United Together, Inc. (“United Together”), Citizens For A Strong America, Inc. (“Citizens For A Strong America”), Govern or Go Home, Inc. (“Govern or Go Home”), Americans Committed For Progress, Inc. (“Americans Committed For Progress”), Citizens for America, Inc. (“Citizens for America”), Progress Together, Inc. (“Progress Together”), Patriotic Americans PAC, Inc. (“Patriotic Americans”), No Labels Action, Inc. (“No Labels Action”), Progress Tomorrow, Inc. (“Progress Tomorrow”), and Nancy Jacobson (“Jacobson”), allege as follows: 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT No Labels owes Rimylan $3,708,214.26. Under a Binding Term Sheet, effective as of December 3, 2016, Rimylan agreed to provide political data and analytic services exclusively to No Labels in connection with the 2018 congressional primary elections. In exchange No Labels agreed to order and pay for $5 million in services from Rimylan during the 2018 election cycle – that is, before November 6, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Procedure of the United States Congress
    LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS I. OVERVIEW This document explains the legislative procedures of the United States Congress. The information may be useful to NGOs seeking to inform Members of Congress about issues and understand the legislative process. The material is drawn from the House web site1 as well as the observations of a former Legislative Director for the House. √ The best way to become involved in the legislative process is at the committee or subcommitee level, particularly during the markup (amendment process). The committee members with the most influence are the chairmen (majority party) or ranking members (the most senior member of the minority party).2 They are in the best position to move and influence legislation. With respect to the appropriations process, the same is true: each subject area is the responsibility of a appropriations subcommittee chairman, who has vast influence over the process.3 √ It is important to have an appreciation of the political dynamics of each house, including which party is in the majority and which is in the minority.4 The majority can tightly control the agenda of the floor and the committees, particularly in the House. √ It is also helpful to appreciate the importance of issue politics, ethnic voting blocks, and district constituencies in the United States. A member of Congress may be more willing to listen on an issue if approached by a trade association, civic group, or interest group from his district. Many international issues have their best appeal as “local issues,” for example, a member of Congress with a strong Hispanic voting population may be more interested in issues that affect Latin America.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Legislative Membership Groups in Cross-National Perspective: Congressional Membership Organizations and European Parliament Intergroups Compared
    Informal Legislative Membership Groups in Cross-National Perspective: Congressional Membership Organizations and European Parliament Intergroups Compared John David Rausch, Jr., Ph.D. Teel Bivins Professor of Political Science West Texas A&M University Canyon, Texas, USA [email protected] Mary Scanlon Rausch Head Catalog Librarian West Texas A&M University Canyon, Texas, USA [email protected] Prepared for delivery at the 11th Congress of the Association Française de Science Politique (French Political Science Association) at Institut d’Etudes Politiques in Strasbourg, August 31 – September 2, 2011. Informal Legislative Membership Groups in Cross-National Perspective: Congressional Membership Organizations and European Parliament Intergroups Compared Abstract This paper compares congressional membership groups in the United States Congress with Intergroups in the European Parliament. This research seeks to better understand why members of legislative bodies choose to create regularized informal groups to consider policy options that cannot or will not be considered by formal party groups. In the United States Congress, representatives and senators create membership organizations (CMOs), usually referred to as “caucuses” around issues like race and ethnicity (the Congressional Black Caucus) or industry (the Congressional Steel Caucus) or issue area (the Congressional Pro-Life Caucus). Members of the European Parliament organize Intergroups to consider similar issues. These groups include the European Parliament Intergroup on LGBT Rights, the Health Intergroup, and the Youth Intergroup. CMOs are well-studied by academics and journalists. The methods used to study CMOs may be applied to European Parliament Intergroups to determine if there are common explanations for the creation of these informal groups in two different legislative bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Caucus and Conference: Party Organization in the U.S. House of Representatives
    Caucus and Conference: Party Organization in the U.S. House of Representatives by Ronald M. Peters, Jr. Department of Political Science and Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center University of Oklahoma Prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois April 25-28, 2002 Abstract The House Democratic Caucus and the House Republican Conference have witnessed both similarities and differences over the course of their respective histories. This paper traces the evolution of the two party organizations and examines their current operation. It is concluded that today they differ from each other in fundamental respects. The Democratic Caucus is a discussion forum. It is coalitional and internal in its focus. The Republican Conference is a public relations firm. It is ideological and external in its focus. Both party caucuses are affected by contextual variables. These include majority/minority status and party control of the White House. The most important factor shaping the two party organizations is party culture, which is shaped by each legislative party's previous history and by the two parties' respective constituency base. This examination of the two party caucuses has implications for theory. On the one hand, similarities in the pattern of meetings, participation by members, and occasional sponsorship of retreats and task forces lend credence to positive theories that seek nomothetic explanations of congressional behavior. On the other hand, the evident differences in the day-to-day operation of the two party organizations, the functions that these organizations perform, and the relationship in which they stand to the party leadership, suggest that any explanation will have to take into account inter-party variation.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, APRIL 22, 2004 No. 53 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the we look forward to this opportunity The Reverend Ronald J. Nuzzi, Direc- United States of America, and to the Repub- every year when we have this chance to tor, ACE Leadership Program, Univer- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, visit with you and catch up on each sity of Notre Dame, offered the fol- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. other’s lives. lowing prayer: f Every one of you has spent precious In every age, O Lord, You have been WARM WELCOME FOR THE years of your life, some of the best our refuge. So we seek Your wisdom REVEREND RONALD J. NUZZI years of your life, working to represent that justice may flow from our deeds. (Mr. RYAN of Ohio asked and was the needs and concerns of the Amer- Bless the work of our hands this day. ican people right here in this Chamber. By the power of Your outstretched given permission to address the House arm, open our eyes to see the needs of for 1 minute and to revise and extend Your commitment to your Nation did all who suffer, our ears to hear the cry his remarks.) not end when you left the halls of Con- of the poor, our hearts to feel the an- Mr.
    [Show full text]