Taxonomic and Anatomical Notes on Viola Sect. Viola (Violaceae) in Iran
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Traditional Uses, Antimicrobial Potential, Pharmacological
NAAS Score: 4.11; IC Value: 74.82; UGC-India Approved The Journal of Phytopharmacology 2018; 7(1): 103-105 Online at: www.phytopharmajournal.com Review Article Traditional uses, Antimicrobial potential, Pharmacological ISSN 2320-480X properties and Phytochemistry of Viola odorata: A Mini JPHYTO 2018; 7(1): 103-105 January- February Review Received: 23-01-2018 Accepted: 26-02-2018 Ajeet Singh*, Shweta Dhariwal, Navneet © 2018, All rights reserved ABSTRACT Ajeet Singh Department of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukul Kangri Viola odorata Linn. is belongs to the family violaceae. It is popularly known as Sweet Violet, English Violet, University, Haridwar, Uttarakhand- Common Violet, or Garden Violet and Gulbanafsa in Hindi. V. odorata is commonly used as remedy for 249404, India coughs, sore throat, hoarseness and tonsillitis. It is valued as an expectorant, antioxidant, diaphoretic, Shweta Dhariwal antibacterial, antipyretic, diuretic and as a laxative. The pharmacological studies revealed the role of V. Department of Botany, Chaudhary odorata in some Unani drugs for treatment of common cold, asthma, antimicrobial, and cough associated Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar diseases. It is rich in many phytoconstituents such as, saponins, salicylates, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, Pradesh, India tannins, phenolics, coumarins, phenolic glycosides, gaultherin, violutoside, saponins, flavonoids, and odoratine. It is an ethnobotanical herb of India. It holds a special position as a potent adaptive and aphrodisiac Navneet Department of Botany and in Ayurvedic System of Medicine. Microbiology, Gurukul Kangri University, Haridwar, Uttarakhand- 249404, India Keywords: Viola odorata, Ethnobotanical uses, Pharmacology, Antimicrobial potential, and Phytochemistry. 1. INTRODUCTION Viola odorata Linn. is belongs to the family Violaceae. It is commonly known as Sweet Violet, English Violet, Common Violet, or Garden Violet and Gulbanafsa in Hindi. -
Cyclotides Evolve
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy 218 Cyclotides evolve Studies on their natural distribution, structural diversity, and activity SUNGKYU PARK ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6192 ISBN 978-91-554-9604-3 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-292668 2016 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in B/C4:301, BMC, Husargatan 3, Uppsala, Friday, 10 June 2016 at 09:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Pharmacy). The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor Mohamed Marahiel (Philipps-Universität Marburg). Abstract Park, S. 2016. Cyclotides evolve. Studies on their natural distribution, structural diversity, and activity. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy 218. 71 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9604-3. The cyclotides are a family of naturally occurring peptides characterized by cyclic cystine knot (CCK) structural motif, which comprises a cyclic head-to-tail backbone featuring six conserved cysteine residues that form three disulfide bonds. This unique structural motif makes cyclotides exceptionally resistant to chemical, thermal and enzymatic degradation. They also exhibit a wide range of biological activities including insecticidal, cytotoxic, anti-HIV and antimicrobial effects. The cyclotides found in plants exhibit considerable sequence and structural diversity, which can be linked to their evolutionary history and that of their host plants. To clarify the evolutionary link between sequence diversity and the distribution of individual cyclotides across the genus Viola, selected known cyclotides were classified using signature sequences within their precursor proteins. By mapping the classified sequences onto the phylogenetic system of Viola, we traced the flow of cyclotide genes over evolutionary history and were able to estimate the prevalence of cyclotides in this genus. -
History and Cultivation of Parma Violets (Viola, Violaceae) in the United Kingdom and France in the Nineteenth Century
History AND Cultivation OF PARMA VIOLETS (VIOLA, VIOLACEAE) IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND FRANCE IN THE NINETEENTH Century LUÍS MENDONÇA DE CARVALHO,1,2 FRANCISCA MARIA FERNANDES,3 MARIA DE FÁTIMA NUNES,3 JOÃO BRIGOLA,3 NATHALIE CASBAS,4 AND CLIVE GROVES5 Abstract. Scented cultivars of Parma violets were among the most important urban plants during the nineteenth century, with many references in literature, fashion, art and flower trade. Our research analyzed data related to Parma violets in France and in the United Kingdom and presents the cultivars introduced during the nineteenth century. Keywords: Parma violets, Viola cultivars, United Kingdom, France, social history The first records describing the use of violets origin. Earlier Italian literature from the XVI (Viola L., Violaceae) in Europe are from Ancient century refers to violets with a strong fragrance Greece: fragrant violets were sold in the and pleiomerous flowers that were obtained Athenian agora; praised by Greek poets, as in the from the East, near the city of Constantinople writings of Sappho (Jesus, 2009); used in (now Istanbul), capital of the former Byzantine medicine (Theophrastus, 1916); had an active role Empire. These texts describe violets that looked in myths, such as in the abduction of Persephone like roses, probably referring to ancestral plants (Ovid, 1955; Grimal, 1996); were used in gar- of the contemporary Parma violets (Malécot et lands (Goody, 1993) and present in the Odyssey’s al., 2007). In Naples (Italy), a local tradition garden of Calypso (Homer, 2003). They proposes that these violets came from Portugal, continued to be used throughout the Middle Ages brought by the Bourbon royal family during the and were present in Renaissance herbals (Cleene XVIII century; hence the local name Violetta and Lejeune, 2002). -
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species. -
Gardens R by DANIEL J
gARDENS r BY DANIEL J. FOLEY Editor of Horticulture REPRINTED FROM THE HERBARIST A Publication of The Herb Society of America No. 19 $<X>$«><>$*3><><>3><><>&3>3^^ For Use and for Delight :>>&<X><2><»3>'3K3x3>O<3K><>c?<>3><^ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 1953 MARY GARDENS r c By DANIEL J. FOLEY MORE than a quarter of a century ago when I first began to explore the plant realm, I remember a visit I made one warm afternoon in June. It was to an old Salem garden where sweet William and fox- gloves, delphiniums and Canterbury bells, ferns and sweet rocket and a host of other plants flourished in a series of meandering bor- ders. The flower beds were edged with violets which were kept trim and formal by reason of the " bobbing " or shearing their owner gave them on several occasions through the summer months. I recall an espaliered peach tree which covered one side of the old tool shed, but most of all I remember a figure of Our Lady enshrined in a shady corner of the garden. My inquisitiveness got the better of me and I asked about the shrine. The dear old lady who tended the garden told me that she had dedicated her garden to Mary and, some- how, the thought lingered with me. At that time I knew nothing of the tradition of the Mary Gardens of the Middle Ages, but a few years later, while doing some research in college, I discovered a host of ancient plant traditions associated with the life of Our Lady. -
East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary
East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document June 2010 © THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE & PETERBOROUGH LTD and EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL All rights reserved. No part of the text of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any type of retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owners All mapping is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Cambridgeshire County Council 100023205 (2005). EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNTY WILDLIFE STIES REGISTER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 Field Survey 2 2.2 Assessment of Sites 3 2.3 Output Format 3 3 RESULTS 4 3.1 Statistics 4 COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES REGISTER ANNEXE Criteria for the Selection of County Wildlife Sites Version 5 (2009). CONTENTS PAGE EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES SPD 1 Introduction 1.1 The East Cambridgeshire District Council (ECDC) County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document has been produced to update the East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Register 2005 so that it can be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework (LDF). 1.2 On the 20th October 2009 East Cambridgeshire District Council adopted its Core Strategy Development Plan Document as part of its LDF. The adoption of the Core Strategy means that most of the policies in the East Cambridgeshire District Local Plan 2000 have been superceded. -
Pharmacognostical and Phytochemical Studies on Viola Tianschanica Maxim –An Uyghur Ethnomedicinal Plant
© 2016 Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research, 4 (3), 95-106 ISSN 0719-4250 http://jppres.com/jppres Original Article | Artículo Original Pharmacognostical and phytochemical studies of Viola tianschanica Maxim. – An Uyghur ethnomedicinal plant [Estudios farmacognóstico y fitoquímico de Viola tianschanica Maxim. – Una planta de la etnomedicina Uyghur] Yun Zhu, Lulu Zhao, Xiangfei Wang, Peng Li* School of Pharmacy, Shihezi University. Key Laboratory of Phytomedicine Resources & Modernization of TCM, Shihezi Xinjiang 832002, PR China. *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Resumen Context: Viola tianschanica Maxim. (Violaceae) is a perennial herb widely Contexto: Viola tianschanica Maxim. (Violaceae) es una hierba perenne distributed in Central Asia, especially in the Xinjiang of China. The whole ampliamente distribuida en Asia Central, especialmente en Xinjiang, herb has been used in traditional Uygur medicines as an antifebrile- China. Esta hierba se ha utilizado en la medicina tradicional Uygur como detoxicate drugs. antifebrífugo-desintoxicante. Aims: To characterize macroscopical and microscopical features of the Objetivos: Caracterizar las peculiaridades macroscópicas y microscópicas root, leave and rhizome of the V. tianschanica Maxim. Explore and de la raíz, hojas y rizoma de V. tianschanica Maxim. Analizar y establecer establish the micro-morphology and quality control methods for this los métodos de micro-morfología y control de calidad de esta planta. plant. Métodos: Las investigaciones farmacognósticas y fitoquímicas -
Plant List for VC54, North Lincolnshire
Plant List for Vice-county 54, North Lincolnshire 3 Vc61 SE TA 2 Vc63 1 SE TA SK NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE TF 9 8 Vc54 Vc56 7 6 5 Vc53 4 3 SK TF 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 Paul Kirby, 31/01/2017 Plant list for Vice-county 54, North Lincolnshire CONTENTS Introduction Page 1 - 50 Main Table 51 - 64 Summary Tables Red Listed taxa recorded between 2000 & 2017 51 Table 2 Threatened: Critically Endangered & Endangered 52 Table 3 Threatened: Vulnerable 53 Table 4 Near Threatened Nationally Rare & Scarce taxa recorded between 2000 & 2017 54 Table 5 Rare 55 - 56 Table 6 Scarce Vc54 Rare & Scarce taxa recorded between 2000 & 2017 57 - 59 Table 7 Rare 60 - 61 Table 8 Scarce Natives & Archaeophytes extinct & thought to be extinct in Vc54 62 - 64 Table 9 Extinct Plant list for Vice-county 54, North Lincolnshire The main table details all the Vascular Plant & Stonewort taxa with records on the MapMate botanical database for Vc54 at the end of January 2017. The table comprises: Column 1 Taxon and Authority 2 Common Name 3 Total number of records for the taxon on the database at 31/01/2017 4 Year of first record 5 Year of latest record 6 Number of hectads with records before 1/01/2000 7 Number of hectads with records between 1/01/2000 & 31/01/2017 8 Number of tetrads with records between 1/01/2000 & 31/01/2017 9 Comment & Conservation status of the taxon in Vc54 10 Conservation status of the taxon in the UK A hectad is a 10km. -
Histo-Anatomical Observations Regarding Viola L
Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi http://www.bio.uaic.ro/publicatii/anale_vegetala/anale_veg_index.html s. II a. Biologie vegetală, 2014, 60, 1: 13-24 ISSN: 1223-6578, E-ISSN: 2247-2711 HISTO-ANATOMICAL OBSERVATIONS REGARDING VIOLA L. SPECIES IN THE GÂRBOAVELE RESERVE (COUNTY OF GALAŢI) Anca MEREACRE1*, Angela TONIUC1, Constantin TOMA1 Abstract: The authors research the structure of vegetative organs of five different vernal species of Viola L. which grow in the Gârboavele - Galaţi nature reserve. The histological features, most of them quantitative ones, which differentiate the five species of Viola L., are pointed out: the thickness of the root and rhizomes peridermis, the number of palisadic layers of the leaf lamina, the presence or absence of tector hairs and of oxaliferous cells, their frequency and position. Key words: Viola, histo-anatomy, vegetative organs, Gârboavele-Galaţi reserve. Introduction There are 28 species of Viola L. in the Romanian flora (Grințescu et al., 1955; Sârbu et al., 2013), four of which known to grow in the Gârboavele - Galaţi nature reserve: Viola arvensis Murray, V. elatior Fr., V. hirta L. and V. odorata L. (Mititelu et al., 1968); to the above mentioned ones we bring a 5-th one, recently found by us: V. kitaibeliana Schult. Two of the species are annual ones (V. arvensis and V. kitaibeliana), while three of them are perennial plants (V. elatior, V. hirta and V. odorata), and have a thick rhizome, with or without aerial runners (V. hirta). The anatomic structure of Viola species has been little investigated until now, as can be seen from the two synthesis treaties, the one about the anatomy of dicotyledonous plants (Metcalfe and Chalk, 1972) and the one about the leaves of angiosperms in general (Napp- Zinn, 1973, 1974). -
Influence of a Heavy-Metal-Polluted Environment on Viola Tricolor Genome Size and Chromosome Number
ACTA BIOLOGICA CRACOVIENSIA Series Botanica 53/1: 7–15, 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10182-011-0001-8 INFLUENCE OF A HEAVY-METAL-POLLUTED ENVIRONMENT ON VIOLA TRICOLOR GENOME SIZE AND CHROMOSOME NUMBER ANETA SŁOMKA1*, DOROTA SIWIŃSKA2, ELŻBIETA WOLNY2, KRISTIN KELLNER1, AND ELŻBIETA KUTA1 1Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Jagiellonian University, 52 Grodzka St., 31–044 Cracow, Poland 2Department of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, University of Silesia, 26/28 Jagiellońska St., 40–032 Katowice, Poland Received March 3, 2011; revision accepted May 30, 2011 Intraspecific changes in genome size and chromosome number lead to divergence and species evolution. Heavy metals disturb the cell cycle and cause mutations. Areas contaminated by heavy metals (metalliferous sites) are places where microevolutionary processes accelerate; very often only a few generations are enough for a new genotype to arise. This study, which continues our long-term research on Viola tricolor (Violaceae), a species occurring on both metalliferous (Zn, Pb, Cd, Cu) and non-metalliferous soils in Western and Central Europe, is aimed at determining the influence of environments polluted with heavy metals on genome size and karyological variability. The genome size of V. tricolor ranged from 3.801 to 4.203 pg, but the differences between metalli- colous and non-metallicolous populations were not statistically significant. Altered chromosome numbers were significantly more frequent in material from the polluted sites than from the non-polluted sites (43% versus 28%). Besides the standard chromosome number (2n = 26), aneuploid cells with lower (2n = 18–25) or high- er (2n = 27, 28) chromosome numbers were found in plants from both types of site, but polyploid (2n = 42) cells were observed only in plants from the metalliferous locality. -
83 References
Evolution of Viola stagnina and its sisterspecies by hybridisation and polyploidisation Hof, K. van den Citation Hof, K. van den. (2010, June 9). Evolution of Viola stagnina and its sisterspecies by hybridisation and polyploidisation. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15684 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral License: thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15684 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). References Abbott RJ, Ireland HE, Joseph L, Davies MS, Rogers HJ. 2005. Recent plant speciation in Britain and Ireland: origins, establishment and evolution of four new hybrid species. Biology and Environment: Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 105: 173–183. Althoff DM, Gitzendanner MA, Segraves KA. 2007. The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: a comparison of homology within and between genomes. Syst. Biol. 56: 477–484. Álvarez I, Wendel JF. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 29: 417–437. Ballard HE, Sytsma KJ, Kowal RR. 1999. Shrinking the violets: Phylogenetic relationships of infrageneric groups in Viola (Violaceae) based on internal transcribed spacer DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 23: 439–458. Ballard HE. 1993. Three new violet hybrids from Appalachia. Castanea 58: 1–9. Beattie AJ. 1971. Pollination mechanisms in Viola. New Phytol. 70: 343–360. Beattie AJ. 1974. Floral evolution in Viola. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61:781–793. Becker W. 1910. Violae Europaeae. Verlag von C. Heinrich, Germany. Becker W. 1917. Violae Asiaticae et Australenses. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 34: 373–433. -
Landscape Management for Grassland Multifunctionality
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.17.208199; this version posted August 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Landscape management for grassland multifunctionality Neyret M.1, Fischer M.2, Allan E.2, Hölzel N.3, Klaus V. H.4, Kleinebecker T.5, Krauss J.6, Le Provost G.1, Peter. S.1, Schenk N.2, Simons N.K.7, van der Plas F.8, Binkenstein J.9, Börschig C.10, Jung K.11, Prati D.2, Schäfer D.12, Schäfer M.13, Schöning I.14, Schrumpf M.14, Tschapka M.15, Westphal C.10 & Manning P.1 1. Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt, Germany. 2. Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Switzerland. 3. Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Germany. 4. Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zürich, Switzerland. 5. Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resource Management, University of Gießen, Germany. 6. Biocentre, University of Würzburg, Germany. 7. Ecological Networks, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, German. 8. Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation. Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands. 9. Institute for Biology, University Freiburg, Germany. 10. Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Germany. 11. Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Germany. 12. Botanical garden, University of Bern, Switzerland. 13. Institute of Zoologie, University of Freiburg, Germany. 14. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, German.