Treasure Act Annual Report 2010 Presented to Parliament Pursuant to Section 12 of the Treasure Act 1996

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Treasure Act Annual Report 2010 Presented to Parliament Pursuant to Section 12 of the Treasure Act 1996 Treasure Act Annual Report 2010 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 12 of the Treasure Act 1996 November 2012 Treasure Act Annual Report 2010 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 12 of the Treasure Act 1996 November 2012 i Minister’s foreword v Contents Introduction vii Treasure cases 2010 viii Tables of Treasure cases 2010 xiii Update on 2009 Treasure cases xlviii © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2012 Edited by I Richardson, M Lewis, H Orange & C Lyons Published by the Department of Portable Antiquities and Treasure, British Museum ii iii Minister’s foreword It is my pleasure to introduce the Treasure Act Annual Report 2010. I would also like to acknowledge the valuable contribution of the Treasure Valuation Committee, The Treasure Act 1996 continues to be a great which provided valuation recommendations for success, ensuring that the most significant over 270 treasure cases from 2010. This summer archaeological discoveries are housed in public marks the first year of Professor Lord Renfrew of museums for the benefit of all. 2010 was a record Kaimsthorn’s Chairmanship of the Committee, and he year, with the number of potential Treasure finds has brought a wealth of archaeological knowledge reported increasing to 860 in England and Wales, and experience to the post. I am thankful for the a 10.5% increase since the previous year. Of these services of all of the Committee members, who items, 299 have been (or are to be) acquired by voluntarily provide their time and expertise. museums. It is especially satisfying that the number of interested parties waiving their right to a reward for Treasure finds remains high, with 86 individuals waiving their Ed Vaizey share in 70 cases. These donations have allowed 37 Minister for Culture, Communications museums to acquire finds that may otherwise have and the Creative Industries not been available for the public to study and enjoy. November 2012 Similarly, many museum acquisitions have been made possible only through the kind assistance of funding bodies, particularly the Art Fund, Headley Trust, Heritage Lottery Fund, National Heritage Memorial Fund and the V&A Purchase Grant Fund. I am extremely grateful to these organisations for their recognition of the importance of archaeological finds and their support of museums’ efforts to acquire them. I am also impressed with local fundraising campaigns, and it is heartening to see so many individuals and organisations in local communities supporting the acquisition of Treasure items and investing in their heritage. There are many others to whom I am indebted for the continued success of the Treasure Act, in particular the Portable Antiquities Scheme and its local network of Finds Liaison Officers (FLOs), to whom most finds of Treasure are reported. The FLOs’ role is vital in informing finders of treasure and landowners of archaeological best practice and their responsibilities under the law and they are also indispensable in facilitating the administration of Treasure cases. Together with curators, scientists and conservators at the British Museum and National Museum Wales, they also provide expert reports on Treasure finds for Coroners. I would also like to thank Coroners and their staff for their diligence in holding Treasure inquests. The Department of Portable Antiquities and Treasure at the British Museum supports Coroners in England and serves as the secretariat for the Treasure Valuation Committee and I am grateful for their continued excellent work. iv v Introduction Under the Treasure Act 1996, finders have a legal obligation to report all finds of potential Treasure. For a summary see finds.org.uk/treasure or the leafletAdvice for Finders of Archaeological Objects, Including Treasure. The Act allows a national or local museum to acquire Treasure finds for public benefit. If this happens, a reward is paid, which is (normally) shared equally between the finder and landowner, though the interested parties may wish to waive their rights to a reward, enabling museums to acquire such finds at no or reduced cost. Rewards are fixed at the full market value of the find, determined by the Secretary of State on the advice of an independent panel of experts known as the Treasure Valuation Committee. Although Treasure finds account for a relatively small proportion of archaeological finds found in England and Wales by the public, any archaeological find may be recorded with the Portable Antiquities Scheme: this data is published online at finds.org.uk. The Scheme and its network of local archaeologists – experts in recording small finds, known as Finds Liaison Officers – play an increasingly important role in the operation of the Treasure Act, advising finders of their legal obligations, providing advice on the process and writing reports on potential Treasure finds for local coroners. Organisation The administration of the Treasure process is undertaken by the Department of Portable Antiquities and Treasure at the British Museum, which employs a Treasure Registrar and four Assistant Treasure Registrars, one of whom is part-time. This work involves the preparation of Treasure cases for inquest (at a Coroner’s Court), the handling of disclaimed cases, the secretariat of the Treasure Valuation Committee, and the payment of rewards to finders/ landowners. Treasure Annual Reports Copies of previous reports can be found at culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/cultural_property/ 3291.aspx vi vii Table B: Summary of all Treasure cases 1997–2010 by geographic area Treasure cases (England, Wales and Northern Ireland) 2010 Number of Treasure cases and The high level of the reporting of Treasure reflects 1997 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total geographic distribution a wider understanding on the part of finders of (pre-Act) (post-Act) The number of Treasure cases reported in 2010 their obligations under the Treasure Act, through Bath & North was 860 (Table A), an increase of 10.5% on 2009; the education and outreach work of the Portable East Somerset 1 2 1 1 5 this is a 328% increase on the first full year of the Antiquities Scheme and its Finds Liaison Officers. Bedfordshire 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 6 7 8 15 6 14 8 78 Act (1998). Table B illustrates the geographic distribution of Berkshire & Reading 1 7 2 1 3 4 2 2 4 4 3 33 Table A: Number of Treasure cases Treasure finds. This shows that in 2010 reporting Bristol 1 1 reported 1988–2011 of Treasure in England was heaviest along the Buckinghamshire (England, Wales & Northern Ireland) eastern half of the country, with North Yorkshire & Milton Keynes 1 2 5 2 2 1 10 8 14 13 9 22 14 12 115 and Lincolnshire each having 67 cases reported, Cambridgeshire followed by Norfolk (65), Suffolk (59), Essex (57) Year No. of Treasure cases & Peterborough 3 2 2 5 4 3 6 2 12 22 34 21 8 21 145 and Kent (52). The only other county with more than 1988 19 30 cases was Wiltshire (36), but the Isle of Wight Cheshire & 1989 23 (30) continued to report a high number of finds Merseyside 1 3 1 3 3 5 6 3 4 1 9 5 10 11 65 1990 22 for a relatively small area. Several areas (mostly Cornwall 1 1 1 1 3 4 3 7 1 9 3 34 1991 16 metropolitan ones and those in the western part of Coventry 2 2 1 5 1992 34 England) had only a handful (or no) cases reported. Cumbria 1 4 1 2 3 8 6 6 13 44 This broadly reflects the pattern of cases reported 1993 37 since 1997. Derbyshire 1 3 1 1 3 5 9 3 7 11 9 7 60 1994 36 Devon 5 4 5 1 2 8 6 15 10 6 12 3 13 90 1995 20 The number of Treasure cases reported from Wales Dorset 3 5 9 3 6 8 15 9 10 16 17 18 17 16 152 1996 24 (25) was up 25% on the previous year, but remains Durham 1 1 2 1 1 4 5 1 5 21 significantly less than the number reported from 1997 79 Essex 2 8 8 8 8 9 19 25 44 44 36 57 54 57 379 England (835). Northern Ireland had no finds of 1998 201 Treasure reported in 2010. Wales has a single Gloucestershire 2 2 6 3 2 2 2 10 12 15 12 12 10 5 95 1999 236 full-time Portable Antiquities Scheme post (though Gloucestershire, 2000 233 finds-recording work is also undertaken by the Welsh South 1 2 1 1 3 5 2 1 3 4 23 Archaeological Trusts) and Northern Ireland is not 2001 214 Hampshire 1 5 10 10 11 10 18 27 30 33 30 24 22 18 249 covered by the Scheme. 2002 240 Herefordshire 1 2 2 5 4 2 5 7 28 2003 427 Hertfordshire 1 5 5 5 4 3 3 12 4 14 16 9 19 14 114 2004 506 Isle of Wight 3 1 3 9 15 21 19 30 21 47 30 199 2005 595 Kent 1 1 12 18 18 12 11 36 40 49 39 42 52 41 52 424 2006 673 Lancashire 1 1 1 3 6 3 3 4 2 5 10 39 2007 747 Leicestershire and Rutland 1 4 2 2 5 6 4 6 14 15 17 17 16 109 2008 806 Lincolnshire 2 8 9 13 13 16 29 18 27 26 34 41 40 67 343 2009 778 Lincolnshire, North 2010 860 & North East 2 2 1 1 1 1 5 6 4 3 9 5 5 11 56 2 0 11 970 London, Greater 1 3 2 1 1 1 5 2 5 6 14 14 15 11 81 Manchester, Greater 2 2 1 1 6 Norfolk 5 8 40 49 43 43 46 58 78 84 76 77 109 82 65 863 Northamptonshire 1 1 3 6 1 8 3 8 12 12 11 17 21 104 Northumberland 1 2 1 1 6 2 2 7 8 12 42 Nottinghamshire 3 2 4 4 3 3 6 6 13 4 14 24 14 20 120 Oxfordshire 1 1 2 1 3 4 5 4 7 10 14 12 11 13 12 100 Shropshire 5 2 1 3 3 7 8 9 12 12 15 9 86 Somerset 3 4 3 4 6 4 12 16 13 12 12 17 16 122 Somerset, North 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 7 16 viii ix Analysis of Treasure finds 1997 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total (pre-Act) (post-Act) Table C provides the dispositional outcome of Staffordshire 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 11 14 2 15 14 15 18 103 Treasure cases according to period and type.
Recommended publications
  • 01 2019-07-23 Planning and Regulatory Functions Minutes.Pdf
    ITEM 1 North Yorkshire County Council Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee Minutes of the meeting held at County Hall, Northallerton on 23 July 2019 at 10.00 am. Present:- County Councillors Peter Sowray (Chairman), David Blades, Eric Broadbent, Robert Heseltine, David Hugill, Mike Jordan, John McCartney, Richard Musgrave, Chris Pearson, and Clive Pearson. County Councillor Stuart Martin was in attendance. There were 3 members of the public present. Copies of all documents considered are in the Minute Book 89. Minutes Resolved - That the Minutes of the meeting held on 2 April 2019, having been printed and circulated, be taken as read and confirmed and signed by the Chairman as a correct record. 90. Declarations of Interest There were no declarations of interest. 91. Public Questions or Statements The representative of the Assistant Chief Executive (Legal and Democratic Services) stated that, apart from the people who had registered to speak in respect of the applications below, and who would be invited to do so during consideration of those Items, there were no questions or statements from members of the public. 92. C4/19/00523/CMA – (NY/2019/0016/73A) - Variation of Condition Nos. 19 & 20 & of Planning Permission Ref: C6/500/109/F/CMA to enable Asphalt Operations to continue until 21:00 hours Monday to Friday until 31 December 2021 at Pateley Bridge Quarry (Coldstones), Greenhow Hill, Pateley Bridge, Harrogate Considered - The report of the Corporate Director - Business and Environmental Services requesting Members to determine a planning application to enable asphalt operations and HGV movements to continue until 21:00 hours Monday to Friday (from the current end time of 18:00 hours) until 31 December 2021 at Pateley Bridge Quarry.
    [Show full text]
  • LINCOLNSHIRE. Franka Joseph Esq
    :w LINCOLNSHIRE. Franka Joseph esq. Ashdale, Crowle, Doncaster Robinson Thomas esq. Southlands, King's way,' Clee Freshney Rev. Frederick M.A. Rectory, Withcall, Louth thorpes, Grimsby 1 Fuller Rev. Henry, 47 Craven road, Newbury, Berks .Ruston Lt.-Col. Jsph. Seward, Aisthorpe hall, Lincoln Gainsford William Dunn esq. Skendleby hall, Spilsby *Sandars John Dryadale esq. M.A. Gate Burton ball' Gartit Bartholomew Claypon esq. Dalby hall, Spilsby Gainsborough *Garfit 'fhomas Cheney esq. Kenwick hall, Louth Scupholme Wm. esq. Fern villa, Epworth, Doncaster Gaussen Ca.samaijor William esq. Howland,s, Batfield Sharpe John Sutton esq. St. Lawrence, Bardney, Lincoln Glew J<Jhn Green e~q. Bnookside, King st.Markert Rasen Sharpley Berbert esq. Westnor, St. Mary's lane, Louth Goulton-Constable James esq. F.S.A. Walcot hall, Sharpley Isaac esq. Boswell, Louth Doncaster *Sheffield Sir Berkeley Digby George bart. Normanby Graham Rev. John M.A. Rectory, .Asterby, Lincoln hall, Doncaster Grant William esq. The Mount, Cleethorpes *ShuHleworth Alfred! esq. E!llstgate house, Lincoln Grantham Charles Frederic esq. The Ball, Skegne&B Simons Benjamin esq. The Grange, Willoughby, Alford Gray Stephen esq. Summerhill, Gainsborough *Sissons William Barling esq. M.R.C.S.Eng. 4 Princeaa Baigh George Henry Caton esq. Grainsby hall, Grimsby Roya-l terrace, Scarborough Ha.lea Rev. George Henry B..!.. Rectory, Stickney, Boston Sleight George Frederick esq. Weelsby hall, Grimsby Banson William Herberti esq. Lindum house, Northolme, Smith Edwin esq. South street, Caistor Gainsborough *Smyth William Grenville esq. Elkington Thorpe, Louth Hardy Benjamin esq. Ill Queen street, Market Rasen Spencer James Cotley esq Hassard Edward Hassard esq. Eslaforde, Woodhall Spa, Spilman Alex.
    [Show full text]
  • Abramson, P, Berg DS, Fossick MR Roman Castleford
    Abramson, P, Berg D S, Fossick M R Roman Castleford: Volume 2, The Structural and Environmental Evidence Castleford 17 2000 35 (Book Review ) Abramson, P A Penny for Your Forts Yorkshire 5 Winter 1987-8 20 Abramson, P Late Iron Age Settlement at Scotch Corner Scotch Corner, North Yorkshire 13 1996 8 Adamson, C H Burn's Cottage, Greta Bridge: An archaeological watching brief Greta Bridge, Durham 15 1998 6 Allon, P A future for the Roman Fort at Ilkley? Ilkley 4 Winter 1986-7 18 Annis, R Two Romano-British Settlement sites at Coulby Newham, Cleveland Coulby Newham, Cleveland 10 1992-3 9 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Recent Excavations by Archaeological Services (WYAS) 14 1997 20 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Excavations in 1997 by Archaeological Services (WYAS) 15 1998 13 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Excavations in 1998 by Archaeological Services (WYAS) 16 1999 18 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Moss Carr Wood, Methley, Leeds Methley 19 2002-2003 20 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Ferrybridge Ferrybridge 19 2002-2003 21 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Ilkley Ilkley 19 2002-2003 21 Archaeological Services (WYAS) North Leeds North Leeds 19 2002-2003 21 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Barnburgh Hall, Barnburgh, South Yorkshire Barnburgh 19 2002-2003 21 Archaeological Services (WYAS) West Moor Park Armthorpe, Doncaster Armthorpe, Doncaster 19 2002-2003 21 Archaeological Services (WYAS) High Street, Shafton, South Yorkshire Shafton 19 2002-2003 21 Archaeological Services (WYAS) Topham Farm, Sykehouse, South Yorkshire Sykehouse 19 2002-2003 22
    [Show full text]
  • CEF - Covid-19 Community Group Support Funding September 2020
    CEF - Covid-19 Community Group Support Funding September 2020 Offering financial assistance to local volunteer groups and networks who are responding to and recovering from the Covid-19 crisis. Please note the funding should only be used for such associated costs. Aim of the funding The aim of The CEF Covid-19 community support funding is to provide a ‘community float’. This will enable local voluntary groups to access financial assistance to support their activities that help communities to connect again. How do community networks access the funding? The funding is held by the Community Support Organisations (CSO) to administer on behalf of Selby District Council. The CSO will be responsible for coordinating and supporting a network of local voluntary community groups. Under this agreement the CSO will agree a simple payment system with each group across the CSOs network can access the fund. Each group that receives funding will need to produce proof of expenditure (i.e. receipts/invoices.) What expenditure is eligible? The funding can be used flexibly to enable groups to operate smoothly without financial barriers. How the funding has been used will be reviewed / discussed at each reporting stage but it is reasonable to conclude that this is likely to be: . Volunteer expenses (might be mileage, refreshments) in relation to covid-19 response/recovery activity . PPE (gloves, sanitisers etc) . Cleaning/sanitary equipment/items . Administrative/marketing supplies (printing, stamps, stationary etc) . Equipment to enable delivery of services (i.e. phone credit, games, social distance signage) What is not eligible? . Personal payments or financial assistance of any kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Establishments 2020/21- Index
    CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE’S SERVICE DIRECTORY OF ESTABLISHMENTS 2020/21- INDEX Page No Primary Schools 2-35 Nursery School 36 Secondary Schools 37-41 Special Schools 42 Pupil Referral Service 43 Outdoor Education Centres 43 Adult Learning Service 44 Produced by: Children and Young People’s Service, County Hall, Northallerton, North Yorkshire, DL7 8AE Contact for Amendments or additional copies: – Marion Sadler tel: 01609 532234 e-mail: [email protected] For up to date information please visit the Gov.UK Get information about Schools page at https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/ 1 PRIMARY SCHOOLS Status Telephone County Council Ward School name and address Headteacher DfE No NC= nursery Email District Council area class Admiral Long Church of England Primary Mrs Elizabeth T: 01423 770185 3228 VC Lower Nidderdale & School, Burnt Yates, Harrogate, North Bedford E:admin@bishopthorntoncofe. Bishop Monkton Yorkshire, HG3 3EJ n-yorks.sch.uk Previously Bishop Thornton C of E Primary Harrogate Collaboration with Birstwith CE Primary School Ainderby Steeple Church of England Primary Mrs Fiona Sharp T: 01609 773519 3000 Academy Swale School, Station Lane, Morton On Swale, E: [email protected] Northallerton, North Yorkshire, Hambleton DL7 9QR Airy Hill Primary School, Waterstead Lane, Mrs Catherine T: 01947 602688 2190 Academy Whitby/Streonshalh Whitby, North Yorkshire, YO21 1PZ Mattewman E: [email protected] Scarborough NC Aiskew, Leeming Bar Church of England Mrs Bethany T: 01677 422403 3001 VC Swale Primary School, 2 Leeming Lane, Leeming Bar, Stanley E: admin@aiskewleemingbar. Northallerton, North Yorkshire, DL7 9AU n-yorks.sch.uk Hambleton Alanbrooke Community Primary School, Mrs Pippa Todd T: 01845 577474 2150 CS Sowerby Alanbrooke Barracks, Topcliffe, Thirsk, North E: admin@alanbrooke.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review of Locality Budgets
    North Yorkshire County Council Corporate and Partnerships Overview and Scrutiny Committee 7 June 2021 Annual review of County Councillor Locality Budgets 2020/21 1. Purpose of the report 1.1. To review the operation of County Councillor Locality Budgets in the financial year 2020/21. 2. Background 2.1. Locality Budgets enable County Councillors to respond to local needs by recommending the allocation of small amounts of funding to support projects or activities that directly promote the social, economic or environmental wellbeing of the communities they represent. 2.2. The Locality Budgets scheme seeks to ensure that County Councillors have a clear role in the allocation of funding in their Division within the criteria and process agreed by the Executive. This role includes actively promoting the scheme within their Division so that the money is allocated to meet appropriate local needs. 2.3. Because the allocation of funding is an executive decision, decisions are made by the Executive Member with responsibility for Stronger Communities, taking into account the information received and the recommendation of the relevant County Councillor. 2.4. Transparency is a significant feature of the scheme: County Councillors are required to declare all relevant interests when making a recommendation, including membership or other connections with organisations that will benefit from or manage a Locality Budget award Awards are published on the County Council website at https://www.northyorks.gov.uk/county-councillor-locality-budgets 1 OFFICIAL 3. Summary of approved recommendations in 2020/21 3.1. In 2020/21 each County Councillor had a Locality Budget allocation of £10,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2.4. Yorkshire Parliamentary Enclosure Awards
    Changes in the status and distribution of mammals of the order Carnivora in Yorkshire from 1600. County history of the fox, badger, otter, pine marten, stoat, weasel, polecat, American mink, wildcat and domestic cat. Item Type Thesis Authors Howes, Colin Anthony Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 25/09/2021 18:49:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4306 APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS. APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS (From English (1985) and Local Records Offices) (In alphabetical order of parish). Key: NR = North Riding, ER = East Riding, WR = West Riding, N = Nottinghamshire NY = North Yorkshire, SY = South Yorkshire, WY = West Yorkshire, H = Humberside, Cl = Cleveland, Cu = Cumbria , D = Durham, La = Lancashire, Li = Lincolnshire, Gm = Greater Manchester, Post Parish/Township Riding 1974 Act Award Acres County Abbotside, High NR NY 1814 1851 128 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1824 1837 938 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1880 1881 9701 Acklam ER NY 1769 1776 796 Acklam ER NY 1825 1854 310 Ackton WR WY 1812 1816 60 Ackworth WR WY 1772 1774 652 Acomb & Holgate WR NY 1774 1776 1581 Adingham WR WY 1865 1873 735 Adlingfleet WR H 1843 1847 1051
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Director of Places Decision to Be Taken After: 22 April 2016
    Report of the Director of Places Decision to be taken after: 22 April 2016 NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCIL ASSETS, CULTURE AND HOUSING CABINET MEMBER ASSETS OF COMMUNITY VALUE NOMINATIONS REGISTER AS AT 14/04/2016 1. OBJECT AND KEY POINTS IN THIS REPORT 1.1 Buildings or land can be nominated by a local community body as an Asset of Community Value under the Community Right To Bid initiative. 1.2 To consider the nomination of the Roxby Methodist Church and Schoolroom as an Asset of Community Value. 1.3 The key points in this report are: • The Nominations Register is regularly updated to show how the Community Right To Bid process is progressing in North Lincolnshire. • Roxby-cum-Risby Parish Council have nominated the Roxby Methodist Church and Schoolroom as an ‘Asset of Community Value’. • To consider the nomination. 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 Local community groups and Town or Parish Councils can nominate buildings or land for listing by North Lincolnshire Council as an Asset of Community Value under the Community Right To Bid initiative. 2.2 For a local group to be able to nominate an asset it will have to show that: • It is based within the local authority area (or a neighbouring authority); and • It is a group that is qualified to make a nomination. 2.3 An asset can be listed if it improves (or has recently improved) the community’s social well being or social interest (which include cultural, sporting or recreational interests) and is likely to do so in the future. 2.4 The attached Nominations Register shows the progress being made for each nomination from the date it was received through to the appeal deadline, as applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Superficial Deposits
    Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York) Commissioned Report CR/04/228N BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMISSIONED REPORT CR/04/228N Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York) D J Harrison, P J Henney, D Minchin, F M McEvoy, D G Cameron, S F Hobbs, D J Evans, G K Lott, E L Ball and D E Highley The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the This report accompanies the two 1:100 000 scale maps: Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Ordnance Survey licence number GD 272191/2006 Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York). Key words North Yorkshire; mineral resources; mineral planning Front cover Coldstones Quarry, Carboniferous limestones, view to southwest. North Yorkshire Bibliographical reference Harrison, D J, Henney, P J, Minchin, D, McEvoy, F M, Cameron, D G, Hobbs, S F, Evans, D J, Lott, G K, Ball, E L, and Highley, D E. 2006. Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York). British Geological Survey Commissioned Report, CR/04/228N. 24pp © Crown Copyright 2006 Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2006 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG from the BGS Sales Desks at Nottingham and Edinburgh; see contact details below or shop online 0115-936 3241 Fax 0115-936 at www.thebgs.co.uk 3488 e-mail: [email protected] The London Information Office maintains a www.bgs.ac.uk reference collection of BGS publications including Shop online at: www.thebgs.co.uk maps for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • ACV Nominations Register Update
    Report of the Director of Operations Decision to be taken after: 30 June 2017 NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCIL INVESTMENT, ASSETS AND EMPLOYMENT CABINET MEMBER ASSETS OF COMMUNITY VALUE - NOMINATIONS REGISTER UPDATE 1. OBJECT AND KEY POINTS IN THIS REPORT 1.1 Local community bodies can nominate buildings as an Asset of Community Value under the Communi ty Right to Bid initiative. 1.2 The Nominations Register is regularly updated to show how the Community Right to Bid process is progressing in North Lincolnshire. 1.3 The council has received a request to consider the nomination of Barton Public Library, Providence House, Barton-upon-Humber, to be listed as an Asset of Community Value. 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 Local community groups and Town or Parish Councils can nominate buildings or land for listing by the council as an Asset of Community Value under the Community Right to Bid initiative. 2.2 For a local group to successfully nominate a property it will have to show that: • It is based within the local authority area (or a neighbouring authority); and • It is a group that is qualified to make a nomination. 2.3 A property can be listed if: (a) An actual or current use of the building furthers the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community; and (b) It is realistic to think there can continue to be use of the building which will further the social well being or social interests of the local community. This includes assets which have been used in the recent past and which it is realistic to consider will do so again during the next five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018/19
    Annual Report 2018/19 Page 1 of 40 We are Citizens Advice and we are here for everyoneWe help people find a way forward We can all face problems that seem complicated or intimidating. At Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire, we believe no one should have to face these problems without good quality, independent advice. That is why we are here: to give people the knowledge and the confidence they need to find their way forward - whoever they are, and whatever their problem. We give advice to thousands of people We are part of a network of independent charities that offers confidential advice online, over the phone, and in person, for free. Last year, Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire helped 8,956 people with 36,923 issues, either face-to-face, telephone, web-chat or email. When we say we are for everyone, we mean it. People rely on us because we are independent and totally impartial. We are four services based at the very heart of our communities, in Hambleton, Richmondshire, Ryedale, and Selby & District. We speak up for our clients No one else sees so many people with so many different kinds of problems, and that gives us a unique insight into the challenges people are facing today. With the right evidence, we can show big organisations – from companies right up to the government – how they can make things better for people. We see how problems can be linked. By helping people with the underlying cause of their problems and making sure they don’t get worse; we save the government and public services hundreds of millions of pounds every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Enclosure & Agricultural Improvement in North-West Lincolnshire from Circa 1600 to 1850
    ENCLOSURE & AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT IN NORTH-WEST LINCOLNSHIRE FROM CIRCA 1600 TO 1850. Thomas M. Smith, MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2012 i Abstract This study sets out to establish the link between enclosure and agricultural improvement in a group of parishes in north-west Lindsey, Lincolnshire between the sixteenth century and the mid-nineteenth century. In particular it emphasises the continuity of enclosure history through time, rather than concentrating only on the period of parliamentary enclosure as has often been the case in the past, and on links to agricultural improvement which include land reclamation, draining and warping. It shows that a simple explanation of enclosure in terms of driving up rents and allowing individual farmers to take their own farming decisions, fails to take into account the particular local circumstances of this area. Using a combination of enclosure documents and related material such as glebe terriers, land tax assessments, census materials, the 1801 agricultural returns and estate papers it sets out to show how agricultural improvement transformed both the landscape and the farming techniques in this area. In this process it covers a range of related topics including landownership, population, and the socio-economic structure of the villages of north-west Lindsey. It shows clearly that in this area enclosure is as much as anything associated with land drainage, and with improvements brought about by warping. These processes were interwoven, and separating enclosure out as a single movement underestimates the complexity of the farming arrangements required to ensure the most productive farming in this area.
    [Show full text]