DOCSLIB.ORG

Sdiff(S ) and the Orbit Method Arxiv:1806.05235V2 [Hep-Th]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sdiff(S ) and the Orbit Method Arxiv:1806.05235V2 [Hep-Th] SDiff(S2) and the orbit method Robert Penna Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The group of area preserving diffeomorphisms of the two sphere, SDiff(S2), is one of the simplest examples of an infinite dimensional Lie group. It plays a key role in incompressible hydrodynamics and it recently appeared in general relativity as a subgroup of two closely related, newly defined symmetry groups. We investi- gate its representation theory using the method of coadjoint orbits. We describe the Casimir functions and the Cartan algebra. Then we evaluate the trace of a simple SDiff(S2) operator using the Atiyah-Bott fixed point formula. The trace is divergent but we show that it has well-defined truncations related to the structure of SDiff(S2). Finally, we relate our results back to the recent appearances of SDiff(S2) in black hole physics. arXiv:1806.05235v2 [hep-th] 27 Nov 2019 Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Labeling the states2 2.1 Coadjoint orbits and Casimir functions3 2.2 SO(3) revisited5 2.3 Cartan algebra6 3 Traces8 3.1 SDiff(S2) 10 3.2 Fixed points 11 3.3 Complex coordinates 11 3.4 Result and discussion 12 4 Discussion 13 1 Introduction The set of area preserving diffeomorphisms of the two-sphere, SDiff(S2), is a basic example of an infinite dimensional Lie group. It is the configuration space and the symmetry group of the incompressible Euler equations for fluid flow on the sphere [1–5]. It may have a role to play in black hole physics, where it is a subgroup of two recently introduced symmetry groups. One acts on the black hole event horizon [6–8] and the other acts on the asymptotic boundary of asymptotically flat spacetimes [9– 11]. The possibility of connections to black hole physics was the original motivation for the present work. Elements of SDiff(S2) are smooth invertible maps from the sphere to itself that preserve the area form. Composition of two maps, η1 ◦ η2, gives the group structure. The tangent space of SDiff(S2) at the identity map is the space of divergence-free vector fields on the sphere, SVect(S2). The Lie bracket of two divergence-free vector fields is minus the usual vector field commutator. In a coordinate chart, the usual vector field commutator is @vj @vj [v ; v ]j = vi 2 − vi 1 : (1.1) 1 2 1 @xi 2 @xi In the context of incompressible fluid dynamics on the sphere, the maps from Lagrangian coordinates (a choice of fluid frame) to Eulerian coordinates (a choice – 1 – of space fixed frame) are elements of SDiff(S2). The fluid’s instantaneous velocity field is an element of SVect(S2). The incompressible Euler equations have an infinite dimensional “particle relabeling symmetry,” which comes from an action of SDiff(S2) on phase space. This symmetry gives an infinite number of conservation laws, which are equivalent to Kelvin’s circulation theorem. In the context of hole hole physics, the analogous conservation laws might be related to “superrotation” charge conservation [12–16]. A simple “toy model” for SDiff(S2) is SO(3), the rotation group of three di- mensional Euclidean space. Rotations act on the sphere as area preserving diffeo- morphisms, so SDiff(S2) represents a kind of infinite dimensional enhancement of SO(3). The relationship between SDiff(S2) and incompressible fluid dynamics has a close analogue in the relationship between SO(3) and rigid body dynamics [1–5]. So far we have been describing applications from classical physics, but SO(3) also governs the quantum mechanics of a spinning particle. It is natural to ask if SDiff(S2) has an analogous role to play in quantum field theory, perhaps for some generalization of the spinning particle. It would be especially interesting if such a quantum system could be related back to the appearances of SDiff(S2) in black hole physics. We do not construct such a quantum system in this paper, but instead describe some of the properties such a system would have. We do this by investigating the representation theory of SDiff(S2) using the method of coadjoint orbits. The orbit method is reviewed in [17–19]. We do not assume any familiarity but develop the theory as we go along, using the simpler case of SO(3) and the spinning particle as a guide. A spinning particle’s quantum states can be labeled by the eigenvalues of two ^2 ^ operators, J and Jz, the square of the total angular momentum and the angular momentum along the z-axis. In Section2, we describe the analogue of these operators for SDiff(S2). In Section3, we use the orbit method to study the traces of these operators. Our main result is formula (3.19) for the trace of an SDiff(S2) operator. In Section4, we relate our results back to the recent appearances of SDiff( S2) in black hole physics. SDiff(S2) is a well studied group. Applications to incompressible fluid dynamics have been a major source of motivation [1–5]. Izosimov, Khesin, and Mousavi [20] recently gave a complete classification of generic coadjoint orbits. The representation theory is less well understood. As far as we know, our formula for the trace (3.19) is new, as is the context relating our results to black hole physics. 2 Labeling the states The states of a quantum spinning particle can be labeled by the eigenvalues of two ^2 ^ operators, J and Jz. The goal of the present section is to find the analogue of these – 2 – operators for SDiff(S2). We use the method of coadjoint orbits. We develop the theory as we go along, using SO(3) and the spinning particle as a guide. The angular momentum of a classical spinning particle is a three-vector, J~. The space of states of a classical spinning particle with fixed J 2 is a two sphere, 2 3 2 SJ2 ⊂ R , with radius jJj. Classically, any angular momentum vector on SJ2 is ^ ^ allowed. Quantum mechanically, the angular momentum is an operator and Jx, Jy, ^ and Jz are not all independent. A quantum state is uniquely fixed by the eigenvalues ^2 ^ ^ ^ ^ of J and Jz alone. This reflects the fact that the quantum operators Jx, Jy, and Jz do not commute. The nonvanishing commutators are ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ [Jx; Jy] = iJz; [Jy; Jz] = iJx; [Jz; Jx] = iJy; (2.1) which is the Lie algebra so(3). Quantum states are labeled by J^2 and by a set of ^ mutually commuting generators of the Lie algebra. Jz commutes with itself but not ^2 ^ with either of the other two generators, so the eigenvalues of J and Jz suffice to label the states. Now we want to extend this discussion to SDiff(S2). First we need the analogues ~ 3 2 ~ of J 2 R and SJ2 . The spinning particle’s classical angular momentum vector, J, acts on the spinning particle’s phase space as an infinitesimal rotation generator. The infinitesimal generators of SDiff(S2) transformations are divergence-free vector fields. So the analogue of R3 is the infinite dimensional vector space SVect(S2). Acting with SO(3) on a fixed angular momentum vector J~ 2 R3 sweeps out the two-sphere, 2 ~ 3 SJ2 = fg · Jjg 2 SO(3)g ⊂ R : (2.2) 3 2 The action of SO(3) on R is the adjoint action and SJ2 is an adjoint orbit. The analogues of the two-spheres for SDiff(S2) are the orbits of the adjoint action of SDiff(S2) on SVect(S2). Classifying the adjoint orbits gives the classical analogues of the J^2 operator. This classification has been known heuristically for a long time but a rigorous proof was only given recently [20]. We turn to a description of these results. 2.1 Coadjoint orbits and Casimir functions The adjoint action of SDiff(S2) on SVect(S2) is defined by first considering the action of SDiff(S2) on itself by conjugation, η0 ! η ◦ η0 ◦ η−1; (2.3) and then studying the limit where η0 is close to the identity. This means we can expand η0 = id: + tξ + O(t2); (2.4) where ξ is a divergence-free vector field. Plugging into (2.3) and differentiating with respect to t at t = 0 defines the adjoint action of η on ξ. – 3 – This can be understood more simply using coordinates. Set x ≡ η(X) and think of η as the change of coordinates Xi ! xi. Then the adjoint action sends i @xi j ξ (X) ! @Xj ξ (X). Our goal is to describe the orbits of this action. We can make things easier by switching to the dual vector space SVect(S2)∗. The dual of a vector field is one-form. To define SVect(S2)∗, we need an analogue of the divergence-free condition for the one-forms. A one-form, u 2 Ω1(S2), gives a linear map on SVect(S2) as follows: Z u(ξ) ≡ u ^ ιξµ, (2.5) S2 where ιξµ is the interior product with the area form, µ, on the two-sphere. Now if u = df is exact, then Z Z df(ξ) = df ^ ιξµ = d(f ^ ιξµ) = 0; (2.6) S2 S2 where we used Cartan’s identity and divξ = 0 to set dιξµ = Lξµ − ιξdµ = 0. Equation (2.6) shows that exact forms annihilate SVect(S2). To define SVect(S2)∗, we should therefore identify two one-forms u and u0 if they differ by an exact form. This is the analogue of the divergence-free condition. It gives the coset construction SVect(S2)∗ = Ω1(S2)=dΩ0(S2).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coadjoint Orbits of Lie Algebras and Cartan Class
    Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 15 (2019), 002, 20 pages Coadjoint Orbits of Lie Algebras and Cartan Class Michel GOZE y and Elisabeth REMM z y Ramm Algebra Center, 4 rue de Cluny, F-68800 Rammersmatt, France E-mail: [email protected] z Universit´ede Haute-Alsace, IRIMAS EA 7499, D´epartement de Math´ematiques, F-68100 Mulhouse, France E-mail: [email protected] Received September 13, 2018, in final form December 31, 2018; Published online January 09, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2019.002 Abstract. We study the coadjoint orbits of a Lie algebra in terms of Cartan class. In fact, the tangent space to a coadjoint orbit O(α) at the point α corresponds to the characteristic space associated to the left invariant form α and its dimension is the even part of the Cartan class of α. We apply this remark to determine Lie algebras such that all the nontrivial orbits (nonreduced to a point) have the same dimension, in particular when this dimension is 2 or 4. We determine also the Lie algebras of dimension 2n or 2n + 1 having an orbit of dimension 2n. Key words: Lie algebras; coadjoint representation; contact forms; Frobenius Lie algebras; Cartan class 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B20; 17B30; 53D10; 53D05 1 Introduction Let G be a connected Lie group, g its Lie algebra and g∗ the dual vector space of g. We identify g with the Lie algebra of left invariant vector fields on G and g∗ with the vector space of left invariant Pfaffian forms on G.
    [Show full text]
  • C*-Algebras and Kirillov's Coadjoint Orbit Method
    C∗-ALGEBRAS AND KIRILLOV'S COADJOINT ORBIT METHOD DAVID SCHWEIN One of the main goals of representation theory is to understand the unitary dual of a topological group, that is, the set of irreducible unitary representations. Much of modern number theory, for instance, is concerned with describing the unitary duals of various reduc- tive groups over a local field or the adeles, and here our understanding of the representation theory is far from complete. For a different class of groups, the nilpotent Lie groups, A. A. Kirillov gave in the mid- nineteenth century [Kir62] a simple and transparent description of the unitary dual: it is the orbit space under the coadjoint action of the Lie group on the dual of its Lie algebra. The goal of this article, notes for a talk, is to explain Kirillov's result and illustrate it with the Heisenberg group, following Kirillov's excellent and approachable book on the subject [Kir04]. We begin with an introductory section on the unitary dual of a C∗-algebra, the proper setting (currently) for unitary representations of locally compact groups, following Dixmier's exhaustive monograph on C∗-algebras [Dix77]. 1. C∗-algebras and the unitary dual The theory of unitary representations of locally compact topological groups, for instance, reductive p-adic groups, is a special case of the more general theory of representations of C∗-algebras. In this section we review the representation theory of C∗-algebras and see how it specializes to that of topological groups. 1.1. Definitions and examples. A Banach algebra is a Banach space A equipped with an algebra structure with respect to which the norm is sub-multiplicative: ka · bk ≤ kak · kbk; a; b 2 A: We do note require Banach algebras to be unital, and in fact, we will see shortly that there are many natural examples that are not unital.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation Theory
    M392C NOTES: REPRESENTATION THEORY ARUN DEBRAY MAY 14, 2017 These notes were taken in UT Austin's M392C (Representation Theory) class in Spring 2017, taught by Sam Gunningham. I live-TEXed them using vim, so there may be typos; please send questions, comments, complaints, and corrections to [email protected]. Thanks to Kartik Chitturi, Adrian Clough, Tom Gannon, Nathan Guermond, Sam Gunningham, Jay Hathaway, and Surya Raghavendran for correcting a few errors. Contents 1. Lie groups and smooth actions: 1/18/172 2. Representation theory of compact groups: 1/20/174 3. Operations on representations: 1/23/176 4. Complete reducibility: 1/25/178 5. Some examples: 1/27/17 10 6. Matrix coefficients and characters: 1/30/17 12 7. The Peter-Weyl theorem: 2/1/17 13 8. Character tables: 2/3/17 15 9. The character theory of SU(2): 2/6/17 17 10. Representation theory of Lie groups: 2/8/17 19 11. Lie algebras: 2/10/17 20 12. The adjoint representations: 2/13/17 22 13. Representations of Lie algebras: 2/15/17 24 14. The representation theory of sl2(C): 2/17/17 25 15. Solvable and nilpotent Lie algebras: 2/20/17 27 16. Semisimple Lie algebras: 2/22/17 29 17. Invariant bilinear forms on Lie algebras: 2/24/17 31 18. Classical Lie groups and Lie algebras: 2/27/17 32 19. Roots and root spaces: 3/1/17 34 20. Properties of roots: 3/3/17 36 21. Root systems: 3/6/17 37 22. Dynkin diagrams: 3/8/17 39 23.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solution to a Generalized Toda Lattice and Representation Theory
    ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS 34,195338 (1979) The Solution to a Generalized Toda Lattice and Representation Theory BERTRAM KOSTANT* Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 CONTENTS 0. Introduction 0.1. Statement of the main results 0.2. A brief description of Sections l-7 0.3. General comments 1. Poisson commutatierity of translated invariants 1.1. A formula for the Poisson bracket 1.2. The case of a subalgebra of a semi-simple Lie algebra 1.3. Relating cent 8’ to S(g)’ 1.4. The theorem [I’, Jf3 = 0 for Lie summands 1.5. The case of a Bore1 subalgebra where f = C e-,. 1.6. The commutativity of certain vector fields on a;’ 2. The variety Z of normalized Jacobi elements 2.1. The variety 8, = f + d and invariants I E So 2.2. The vector fields II, I E So, on Z 2.3. The subvarieties Z(y) Z; Z and IV-conjugacy 2.4. The Bruhat-Gelfand decomposition, the isomorphism j3,: Q* -+ Z(r), and the rationality of Z(y) in the complex case 2.5. The foliation Z = U Z(r) in the complex case 2.6. The isomorphism b(W): G1”,, + Z(y) in the complex case 3. The parametrization Z s H x A, in the real case 3.1. The polar decomposition and centralizers # 3.2. The relation Gv n RHN = G,u for y E Z and the isomorphism Z(y) z [w’ 3.3. The open Weyl chamber R, and Z 3.4. The normalizer G of 9 in Ad gc and the subset G(*) = s(K)G* C G 3.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on the Orbit Method, by AA
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 42, Number 4, Pages 535–544 S 0273-0979(05)01065-7 Article electronically published on April 6, 2005 Lectures on the orbit method, by A. A. Kirillov, Graduate Studies in Mathemat- ics, vol. 64, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, xx+408 pp., $65.00, ISBN 0-8218-3530-0 1. Introduction without formulas This book is about a wonderfully successful example of (if you will forgive some geometric language) circular reasoning. Here is the short version. Everywhere in mathematics, we find geometric objects M (like manifolds) that are too complicated for us to understand. One way to make progress is to introduce a vector space V of functions on M.ThespaceV may be infinite-dimensional, but linear algebra is such a powerful tool that we can still say more about the function space V than about the original geometric space M. (With a liberal interpretation of “vector space of functions”, one can include things like the de Rham cohomology of M in this class of ideas.) Often M comes equipped with a group G of symmetries, but G and M may be even less comprehensible together than separately. Nevertheless, G will act on our function space V by change of variables (giving linear transformations), and so we get a representation of G on V . Our original (and impossible) problem of understanding all actions of G on geometric spaces M is therefore at least related to the problem of understanding all representations of G. Because this is a problem about vector spaces, it sounds a bit less daunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Math.RT] 3 Feb 2006 .Tehiebr Group Heisenberg the 8
    KYUNGPOOK Math J. 42(2002), 199-272 The Method of Orbits for Real Lie Groups Jae-Hyun Yang Department of Mathematics, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Korea e-mail : [email protected] (2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 22-XX, 20C35.) In this paper, we outline a development of the theory of orbit method for representa- tions of real Lie groups. In particular, we study the orbit method for representations of the Heisenberg group and the Jacobi group. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Quantization 3. The Kirillov Correspondence 4. Auslander-Kostant’s Theorem 5. The Obstacle for the Orbit Method 5.1. Compact Lie Groups 5.2. Semisimple Lie Groups 6. Nilpotent Orbits and the Kostant-Sekiguchi Correspondence 6.1. Jordan Decomposition 6.2. Nilpotent Orbits 6.3. The Kostant-Sekiguchi Correspondence 6.4. The Quantization of the K-action (due to D. Vogan) 7. Minimal Representations (g,h) 8. The Heisenberg Group HR 8.1. Schr¨odinger Representations 8.2. The Coadjoint Orbits of Picture 9. The Jacobi Group J arXiv:math/0602056v1 [math.RT] 3 Feb 2006 9.1. The Jacobi Group G 9.1.1. The Standard Coordinates of the Jacobi Group GJ 9.1.2. The Iwasawa Decomposition of the Jacobi Group GJ 9.2. The Lie Algebra of the Jacobi Group GJ (Received: December 4, 2001. Revised: May 14, 2002.) Key words and phrases: quantization, the Kirillov correspondence, nilpotent orbits, the Kostant-Sekiguchi correspondence, minimal representations, Heisenberg groups, the Jacobi group. This work was supported by INHA UNIVERSITY Research Grant.(INHA-21382) 199 200 Jae-Hyun Yang 9.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Edge Modes, Coadjoint Orbits, and Hydrodynamics
    Gravitational Edge Modes, Coadjoint Orbits, and Hydrodynamics William Donnelly,1 Laurent Freidel,1 Seyed Faroogh Moosavian,1;2 Antony J. Speranza1 1Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. N., Waterloo ON, N2L 2Y5, Canada 2Department of Physics, McGill University, Ernest Rutherford Physics Building, 3600 Rue Univer- sity, Montr´eal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: The phase space of general relativity in a finite subregion is characterized by edge modes localized at the codimension-2 boundary, transforming under an infinite- dimensional group of symmetries. The quantization of this symmetry algebra is conjectured to be an important aspect of quantum gravity. As a step towards quantization, we derive a complete classification of the positive-area coadjoint orbits of this group for boundaries that are topologically a 2-sphere. This classification parallels Wigner's famous classification of representations of the Poincar´egroup since both groups have the structure of a semidirect product. We find that the total area is a Casimir of the algebra, analogous to mass in the Poincar´egroup. A further infinite family of Casimirs can be constructed from the curvature of the normal bundle of the boundary surface. These arise as invariants of the little group, which is the group of area-preserving diffeomorphisms, and are the analogues of spin. Additionally, we show that the symmetry group of hydrodynamics appears as a reduction of the corner symmetries of general relativity. Coadjoint orbits of both groups are classified by the same arXiv:2012.10367v1 [hep-th] 18 Dec 2020 set of invariants, and, in the case of the hydrodynamical group, the invariants are interpreted as the generalized enstrophies of the fluid.
    [Show full text]
  • Coadjoint Orbits of Lie Algebras and Cartan Class Michel Goze, Elisabeth Remm
    Coadjoint Orbits of Lie Algebras and Cartan Class Michel Goze, Elisabeth Remm To cite this version: Michel Goze, Elisabeth Remm. Coadjoint Orbits of Lie Algebras and Cartan Class. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry : Methods and Applications, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, 2019, 15, pp.002. 10.3842/SIGMA.2019.002. hal-02383703 HAL Id: hal-02383703 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02383703 Submitted on 27 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 15 (2019), 002, 20 pages Coadjoint Orbits of Lie Algebras and Cartan Class Michel GOZE y and Elisabeth REMM z y Ramm Algebra Center, 4 rue de Cluny, F-68800 Rammersmatt, France E-mail: [email protected] z Universit´ede Haute-Alsace, IRIMAS EA 7499, D´epartement de Math´ematiques, F-68100 Mulhouse, France E-mail: [email protected] Received September 13, 2018, in final form December 31, 2018; Published online January 09, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2019.002 Abstract. We study the coadjoint orbits of a Lie algebra in terms of Cartan class. In fact, the tangent space to a coadjoint orbit O(α) at the point α corresponds to the characteristic space associated to the left invariant form α and its dimension is the even part of the Cartan class of α.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIT´E DE POITIERS on Representations of Simply
    UNIVERSITE´ DE POITIERS On representations of simply connected nilpotent and solvable Lie groups G´erardGr´elaud Universit´ede POITIERS UMR CNRS 6086 – Laboratoire de Math´ematiqueset Applications SP2MI - T´el´eport 2 - Boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie BP 30179 86962 FUTUROSCOPE CHASSENEUIL Cedex T´el: 05 49 49 69 03 e-mail :[email protected] On representations of simply connected nilpotent and solvable Lie groups Introduction In these notes following a course I gave during a visit at Pondicherry University in 1992, I write the main results of the theory of representations of simply connected nilpotent Lie groups (the Kirillov’s theory), and some generalizations to simply connected solvable Lie groups. After the basic properties of unitary representations of locally compact groups, especially construction of induced representations and “Mackey’s machine” (Sec- tion 1), I state the classical results on Lie groups and Lie algebras (section 2). In section 3, I give the constuction of polarizations in solvable Lie algebras and in section 4 the description of the the dual space of connected nilpotent Lie groups, using the famous orbit method of A.A. Kirillov. For general solvable Lie groups, I write in section 5 the construction of irreducible holomorphical induced representations. This shows the use of complex polarizations. The section 6 is devoted to a computation of the Kirillov’s character formula and the Plancherel formula for nilpotent Lie groups and also a generalization to some homogeneous spaces of nilpotent Lie groups. In the last section, I write a survey (and some proofs) of the main results of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantization, the Orbit Method, and Unitary Representations
    Quantization, the orbit method, and unitary representations David Vogan Quantization, the orbit method, and Physics Representations unitary representations Orbit method Hyperbolic orbits Elliptic orbits David Vogan Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representation Theory, Geometry, and Quantization: May 28–June 1 2018 Quantization, the Outline orbit method, and unitary representations David Vogan Physics: a view from a neighboring galaxy Physics Representations Orbit method Classical representation theory Hyperbolic orbits Elliptic orbits History of the orbit method in two slides Hyperbolic coadjoint orbits for reductive groups Elliptic coadjoint orbits for reductive groups Quantization, the Quantum mechanics orbit method, and unitary representations David Vogan ! H Physical system complex Hilbert space Physics States ! lines in H Representations Orbit method Observables ! linear operators fAj g on H Hyperbolic orbits Elliptic orbits Expected value of obs A !h Av; vi Energy ! special skew-adjoint operator A0 Time evolution ! unitary group t 7! exp(tA0) Observable A conserved ! [A0; A] = 0 Moral of the story: quantum mechanics is about Hilbert spaces and Lie algebras. Quantization, the Quantum mechanics orbit method, and unitary representations David Vogan ! H Physical system complex Hilbert space Physics States ! lines in H Representations Orbit method Observables ! linear operators fAj g on H Hyperbolic orbits Elliptic orbits Expected value of obs A !h Av; vi Energy ! special skew-adjoint operator A0 Time
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Orbit Method and Quantization
    Notes on the Orbit Metho d and Quantization Reyer Sjamaar Les Diablerets March 1 Contents Orbit metho d and quantization Index theorem in symplectic geometry 2 Orbit metho d and quantization A A Kirillov G Lie group innitedimensional group quan tum group Category of unitary representations of G Objects continuous homomorphisms T G UH H a Hilb ert space Morphism intertwining op erator from T to T continuous linear A H H A H H T g T g 2 1 A H H 3 Example X Gmanifold with Ginvariant mea sure Unitary representation on L X T g f x f g x Map F X X induces intertwining map F L X L X if is absolutely continuous wrt F T is indecomp osable if T T T for nonzero T and T T is irreducible if do es not have nontrivial invariant subspaces For unitary representation irreducible in decomp osable Unirrep unitary irreducible representation 4 Main problems of representation theory Describ e unitary dual G funirreps of Ggequivalence Decomp ose any T into unirreps Z T g T g dy y Y Sp ecial cases for H G closed littl e group G T a for T G decomp ose restriction Res H G S b for S H decomp ose induction Ind H Compute character of T G 5 Ad b let S H UH Supp ose GH has G G invariant measure Ind S L sections of H H G H Obtained by taking space of functions f G H satisfying f g h S hf g and completing wrt inner product Z hf f i hf x f xi dx H GH Ad let C G Put Z T g T g dg G With luck T H H is of trace class and Tr T is a distribution on G the charac
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Theory of Heat from Souriau Lie Groups Thermodynamics and Koszul Hessian Geometry: Applications in Information Geometry for Exponential Families
    entropy Article Geometric Theory of Heat from Souriau Lie Groups Thermodynamics and Koszul Hessian Geometry: Applications in Information Geometry for Exponential Families Frédéric Barbaresco Advanced Radar Concepts Business Unit, Thales Air Systems, Limours 91470, France; [email protected] Academic Editor: Adom Giffin Received: 4 August 2016; Accepted: 27 September 2016; Published: 4 November 2016 Abstract: We introduce the symplectic structure of information geometry based on Souriau’s Lie group thermodynamics model, with a covariant definition of Gibbs equilibrium via invariances through co-adjoint action of a group on its moment space, defining physical observables like energy, heat, and moment as pure geometrical objects. Using geometric Planck temperature of Souriau model and symplectic cocycle notion, the Fisher metric is identified as a Souriau geometric heat capacity. The Souriau model is based on affine representation of Lie group and Lie algebra that we compare with Koszul works on G/K homogeneous space and bijective correspondence between the set of G-invariant flat connections on G/K and the set of affine representations of the Lie algebra of G. In the framework of Lie group thermodynamics, an Euler-Poincaré equation is elaborated with respect to thermodynamic variables, and a new variational principal for thermodynamics is built through an invariant Poincaré-Cartan-Souriau integral. The Souriau-Fisher metric is linked to KKS (Kostant–Kirillov–Souriau) 2-form that associates a canonical homogeneous symplectic manifold to the co-adjoint orbits. We apply this model in the framework of information geometry for the action of an affine group for exponential families, and provide some illustrations of use cases for multivariate gaussian densities.
    [Show full text]