A Teacher's Guide to the Wisconsin Courts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Teacher's Guide to the Wisconsin Courts CONNECTING TO THE COURTS A TEACHER’S GUIDE TO THE WISCONSIN COURTS Wisconsin Municipal Judges Association This guide was originally created for From the Courtroom to the Classroom, an institute for teachers sponsored by the State Bar of Wisconsin, the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Curriculum and Instruction, the Wisconsin Law Foundation, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The guide and 2001 institute were funded by the Director of State Courts Office, State Bar of Wisconsin, and Wisconsin Humanities Council. The 2006 institute was funded by the Director of State Courts Office, the State Bar of Wisconsin, and the Wisconsin Law Foundation. The printing of the 2006 guide was funded by the Wisconsin Municipal Judges Association. From the Courtroom to the Classroom Planning Committee: Attorney Sara Bowen State Bar Law-Related Education Committee Attorney Ellen Henak State Public Defender’s Office-Appellate Division Diana Hess, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Curriculum and Development Dee Runaas State Bar of Wisconsin Amanda K. Todd Director of State Courts Office State Bar of Wisconsin 5302 Easpark Blvd. P.O. Box 7158 Madison, WI 53707-7158 www.wisbar.org (608) 257-3838 Published June 2006 CONNECTING TO THE COURTS A TEACHER’S GUIDE TO THE WISCONSIN COURTS Editors: Karen Leone de Nie Wisconsin Supreme Court Amanda K.Todd Director of State Courts Office Diana Hess, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin - Madison Attorney Ellen Henak State Public Defender's Office - Appellate Division Dear Educator, In February 2000, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the State Bar of Wisconsin, and the University of Wisconsin Department of Curriculum and Instruction conducted an experiment. We brought 28 high school teachers from around the state to Madison for a two-day intensive workshop on teaching about the courts. We explained the concept of judicial independence, identified historic “teachable” cases, introduced a process for selecting appropriate cases for study, and engaged the teachers in interactive exercises such as a moot court, a mock sentencing, and a grant/deny exercise using actual Supreme Court petitions for review. The faculty included justices, judges, lawyers, professors, and Hon. Shirley S. Abrahamson other experts on education and the justice system. These busy Chief Justice people volunteered their time for our experiment, and we crossed Wisconsin Supreme Court our fingers that it would be a success. When the evaluations came in, we celebrated. Teachers told us: I may revamp a lot of my curriculum based on what I learned and This is the best seminar I have ever attended in my 27 years. Faced with sentiments like these, we could do only one thing. We held the second institute in February 2001, and we haven’t missed a year since. The institute changes and grows with each passing year. We have found new ways to incorporate technology, have added teacher-graduates from years past to share their “real-world” knowledge, and in general have used our experience with the program to improve it each year. As word has spread, we have moved from recruiting applicants to creating waiting lists for future sessions. One of the key pieces that has made the institute successful is in your hands. A Teacher’s Guide to the Wisconsin Courts, first published in 2001 and updated and reprinted in 2006, blends the materials used in the institutes with sample lesson plans and other information we have found helpful along the way. Alexis de Tocqueville, the great 19th-century writer and student of American democracy, observed that most public issues in the United States eventually become legal issues. Indeed, Americans do turn to the law every day to resolve their disputes. America’s schools have an important role to play in fostering public understanding of the law and the justice system, but they can’t be expected to do it alone. We hope that the institute, the Web materials, and this book will help our schools to build young adults who have confidence in our legal system, who feel that they have full access to the services this system can provide, and who value the role of law in our society. Sincerely yours, Shirley S. Abrahamson Chief Justice, Wisconsin Supreme Court iii Dear Educators: President John Adams once remarked that “children should be educated and instructed in the principles of freedom.” That Draper pix admonition is no less important today than it was when first advanced, and I am therefore pleased to welcome you and your students to the study of the Wisconsin court system. The lawyers who are members of the Wisconsin State Bar and all of those who, whether lawyers, teachers, or employees of the State Bar, serve on the Law-related Education Committee are grateful to the Wisconsin Municipal Judges Association for its assistance in funding A Teacher’s Guide to the Wisconsin Courts and to the State Bar of Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the Wisconsin Law Foundation and the University of Wisconsin – Madison Department of Curriculum and Instruction for making Attorney Lindsey Draper, chair, the institute possible. State Bar of Wisconsin LRE committee Knowledge of the court system is a critical element in appreciating the freedoms we enjoy, and educating members of the public about law is an important mission of the State Bar of Wisconsin. This guide will help you educate your students about the courts and important court decisions that have played key roles in the history of our state and country. We thank you for all of your efforts in preparing your students for the positions they will assume in our communities and as they learn the balance of rights and responsibilities. One of my favorite quotes, attributed to Andy McIntyre, simply notes that “if you think education is expensive, try ignorance.” The more our young people and families are familiar with all levels of the courts and their workings, the greater will be their appreciation of the impact of the judicial system on all our lives. This is a truly wonderful opportunity to increase knowledge of an essential part of our governmental system. The teacher’s guide was inspired by From the Courtroom to the Classroom, the judicial teaching institute sponsored by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the State Bar of Wisconsin, the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and the Wisconsin Law Foundation. The institute is one of the many resources available to Wisconsin educators through the State Bar of Wisconsin and its Law-related Education Committee. The Law-related Education Committee wishes to thank all who have volunteered their time and efforts and helped create and sustain the judicial teaching institute. It is a source of great pride to hear the responses of those who have participated in the institute and to hear of their appreciation for the many judges, lawyers and volunteers who helped make the institute successful. We are very appreciative of all who have supported the institute and who have helped create and review the teacher’s guide. We encourage all to visit our website at www.legalexplorer.com to learn of additional LRE activities and programs. v Table of Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Federal Courts 5 Teaching Resources: The Function of and Qualifications for Jury Service Chapter 2: Overview of the Wisconsin Court System 21 Teaching Resources: How Tootsie the Goldfish Is Teaching People to Think Like a Judge Chapter 3: Wisconsin Supreme Court 29 Teaching Resources: So Many Cases, So Little Time Grant/Deny Exercise Moot Court Chapter 4: Wisconsin Court of Appeals 69 Chapter 5: Wisconsin Circuit Courts 75 Teaching Resources: Sentencing Exercise Chapter 6: Wisconsin Municipal Courts 91 Teaching Resources: Ordinance Exercises Chapter 7: Judicious Election of Judges 111 Teaching Resources: Mock Judicial Campaign Chapter 8: Connecting to the Courts 125 Appendix 133 “Building a More Perfect Union: Wisconsin’s Contribution to Constitutional Jurisprudence” (includes a list of all cases reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court that originated in Wisconsin) Glossary of Legal Terms Introduction Dear Teacher: The materials in this book are designed to help secondary students learn about constitutions, courts, and cases. Focusing on these topics as part of a comprehensive democracy education program has the potential to help young people build the understanding, skills, and attitudes necessary for active and informed participation in a democracy. Our political and legal systems are complex and often intimidating, but it is apparent from recent research that young people who learn about the legal and political systems in school are more willing to participate as citizens in this democracy. To be effective, democracy education must (1) focus on controversial issues, (2) be taught interactively, (3) and involve outside resource people. The materials in this book are designed with those goals in mind. First, the lessons in the book do not shy away from controversy. Controversial issues are part and parcel of democracy, and it is imperative that young people learn how to develop and communicate well-reasoned opinions on these issues. Therefore, some of the most controversial issues facing society—hate crime legislation, the scope and limits of police power, the relationship between government and religion—are examined in the lessons. Focusing students’ attention on controversial legal issues lends authenticity and helps to ensure that school prepares students for the real world. Content alone, however, does not make for high quality democracy education. It is also important that the way students learn imparts core tenets of democracy. For this reason, the learning strategies embedded throughout this book are highly interactive and collaborative. Through activities such as moot courts and the “grant/deny” petition exercise, students are taught to work cooperatively to analyze core constitutional principles and apply them to real- life situations.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Spring Programs
    CLINICS, JUDICIAL INTERNSHIPS AND SUPERVISED FIELDWORK PROGRAMS 2019 SPRING PROGRAMS APPLICATIONS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO FACULTY ASSISTANT DEBBIE MOORE IN ECKSTEIN HALL SUITE 453 NO LATER THAN 12:00 NOON ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018. INTRODUCTION The Marquette University Law School offers an upper level curriculum that is both rich and diverse in its offerings. Its components include traditional classroom courses, seminars, workshops, perspectives and advanced legal research courses, clinics and internships, directed studies, laws reviews and moot courts, etc., each contributing in its own way to your legal education and formation as a lawyer. When planning a course of study for the remainder of your legal education, you ought to consider how each of these curricular components can best serve your professional needs. Planning is essential so that you can maximize the benefits you derive from the curriculum, take care of satisfying degree requirements and course prerequisites, and otherwise develop the competencies you will need as a lawyer. An important and popular1 component of the curriculum is the segment that is known as “Clinics, Judicial Internships and Supervised Fieldwork Programs.” This component has long been a part of the Marquette curriculum and takes full advantage of the Law School’s proximity to and relationship with the courts, prosecution and defense agencies, and a host of other governmental and public interest agencies. Each program is different and each offers its participants a different kind of experiential learning. In considering these programs, you ought to evaluate how they complement classroom 1 More than 70% of recent graduates participated in at least one internship and many completed more than one.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of The
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 415 540 CS 509 665 TITLE Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (80th, Chicago, Illinois, July 30-August 2, 1997): Media Management and Economics. INSTITUTION Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. PUB DATE 1997-07-00 NOTE 315p.; For other sections of these Proceedings, see CS 509 657-676. PUB TYPE Collected Works Proceedings (021) Reports Research (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Case Studies; Childrens Literature; *Economic Factors; Journalism; *Mass Media Role; Media Research; News Media; *Newspapers; *Publishing Industry; *Television; World War II IDENTIFIERS High Definition Television; Indiana; Journalists; Kentucky; Market Research; *Media Management; Stock Market ABSTRACT The Media Management and Economics section of the Proceedings contains the following 14 papers: "The Case Method and Telecommunication Management Education: A Classroom Trial" (Anne Hoag, Ron Rizzuto, and Rex Martin); "It's a Small Publishing World after All: Media Monopolization of the Children's Book Market" (James L. McQuivey and Megan K. McQuivey); "The National Program Service: A New Beginning?" (Matt Jackson); "State Influence on Public Television: A Case Study of Indiana and Kentucky" (Matt Jackson); "Do Employee Ethical Beliefs Affect Advertising Clearance Decisions at Commercial Television Stations?" (Jan LeBlanc Wicks and Avery Abernethy); "Job Satisfaction among Journalists at Daily Newspapers: Does Size of Organization Make
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Television
    DOCUEEIT RESUME ED 14111 300 .)" IN 004 735 .AUTHOR. Katzman, Ratan TITLE Program Decisions tn Public lelevisibn. 4 Report for the CPB/NCES Programming .Project. INSTITUTION National'AiSociation of Educational Broadcasters, Washington, D.C. ; SPON6.AGENCY National .Center for.Education Statistics (DHEV), Washington, D.C. PUB,DITE Itig 76, NOTE 81p. EDRS PRICE' HF-$0.83 BC-44.67 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Decision Making; *Educational Television;.*Financial Needi; *Einancial'-Support; *Programing Oroadcasty; Public Relations; -Public Support; Television Research , IDENTIFIERS,7 dhildrens Television Workshop; Corporation for Pubiic Broadtasting; Public Broadcasting System .ABSTRACT This report examines public television from the perspectives of the National System, Local Public'Television, and AFhool Programing. It provides a history of the development of Public Broaasking nationally, and includes thegpoints of controversy; between- the- kublic Broadcasting System (PBS) and the Corporation for Piblic Broadca54ngACPB1. A dominant theme is the role which finances play in the_decision making process, and major'sources of funding for national pUblic television,are describea. The general Situation of local public television is examined in terms of the limitations imposed by budget,' the, programing' available from pRs, and the preferences and attitudes of station managers. The role of .the board'of directors and the pelationship'between local stations and the community are considered. In terms of school programing, the report indicates.the impact
    [Show full text]
  • Another St. James
    PRSRT STD **********************************ECRWSS US Postage PAID St. James NY POSTAL CUSTOMER Permit No. 10 october 2012 Volume 25 Number 12 Keeping you up to date on SALES, HAPPENINGS Our Town & PEOPLE • • • • • • In Our Town - St. James S T J A M E S PUBLISHED MONTHLY Another Marvelous St. James Day See photos on pages 94-98 – 2– 2012 Deepwells Farm Haunted House at Deepwells Farm County Park Intersection of 25A & Moriches Road, St. James Friday Sunday October 26 October 28 6pm - 9pm immediately after St. James Chamber of Saturday Commerce October 27 Halloween Costume 12pm - 4pm Parade Admission: Free! NO PETS, PLEASE! Sponsored by: Deepwells Farm Historical Society & Steven Bellone, County Executive St. James Chamber of Commerce Gregory Dawson, Commissioner of Parks For more information, call (631) 862-2020 OUR TOWN • OCTOBER 2012 – 3– IN THIS ISSUE MERCHANT SPOTLIGHT Keith’s Painting & Powerwashing ................ 4 Our• • •Town• • • AROUND TOWN S t J A M e S A Touch of Italy Dinner .................................. 6 Garage Sale on October 20..........................6 Annual Scandinavian Bazaar on November 10 ............................ 6 Veteran’s Day Parade ...................................................................... 8 StAFF Annual Holiday Tea & Sale on November 17 ................................ 8 Ruth Garthe . Editor Fall Rummage Sale Set for October 27 .......................................... 8 Robin Clark . Associate Editor Car Show & Swap Meet at Flowerfield Fairgrounds ....................10 Fairfield Civic
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Civil Trial Journal Summer 2020 • Volume 18 • Number 2
    Wisconsin Civil Trial Journal Summer 2020 • Volume 18 • Number 2 Also In This Issue President’s Message: Getting Past the Roadblock Christine M. Rice WDC Leaders Attorney Spotlight: Henry P. Twomey Avoiding the Pitfalls in Regulatory Flexibilities Successfully Excluding and Relief Funds Heather D. Mogden, Kathryn M. Costanza & Treating Physicians’ David B. Honig Opinions Under Daubert 2020 Advocate of the Year: David J. Pliner Andrew B. Hebl & 2020 Distinguished Professional Service Award: Kathryn A. Pfefferle Carmelo A. Puglisi 2020 Publication Award: Monte E. Weiss Are Plaintiffs Overcharging Wisconsin Wage-and- Hour Claims? Wisconsin Daniel Finerty & Peter Nowak Defense Counsel News from Around the State: Defending Individuals And Businesses In Civil Litigation Trials and Verdicts OFFICERS COLUMNISTS PRESIDENT Kathryn M. Costanza Peter Nowak Christine Rice Hall, Render, Killian, Heath Steinhilber Swanson LLP Simpson & Deardorff, S.C. & Lyman, P.C. [email protected] Kathryn A. Pfefferle PRESIDENT-ELECT Daniel Finerty Boardman & Clark LLP Andrew Hebl Lindner & Marsack, S.C. Boardman & Clark LLP [email protected] Christine M. Rice Andrew B. Hebl President, Wisconsin Defense Counsel SECRETARY/TREASURER Boardman & Clark LLP Christopher Bandt EDITOR Nash, Spindler, Grimstad & McCracken, LLP David B. Honig [email protected] Vincent J. Scipior Hall, Render, Killian, Heath Coyne, Schultz, Becker & Bauer, S.C. IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT & Lyman, P.C. [email protected] Ariella Schreiber Rural Mutual Insurance Heather D. Mogden [email protected] Hall, Render, Killian, Heath PROGRAM CHAIR & Lyman, P.C. Nicole Marklein Cross, Jenks, Mercer & Maffei [email protected] Amicus Curiae Committee Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions DIRECTORS Chair: Monte Weiss Committee Gina Budzinski American Family Insurance Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Appellate Procedure for the Self-Represented Litigant
    Guide to WISCONSIN APPELLATE PROCEDURE for the SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT Clerk of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals 110 East Main Street, Suite 215 P.O. Box 1688 Madison, WI 53701-1688 (608) 266-1880 Guide to Wisconsin Appellate Procedure for the Self-Represented Litigant - Page 1 Important Notes The Guide to Wisconsin Appellate Procedure for the Self-Represented Litigant is not legal advice and cannot be cited as legal authority. This Guide is not intended to replace or to be a substitute for the Wisconsin Rules of Appellate Procedure, and should be used in conjunction with the Rules. Anyone considering initiating an appeal may wish to seek legal counsel. The Guide to Wisconsin Appellate Procedure for the Self-Represented Litigant is based upon the Wisconsin Rules of Appellate Procedure in effect as of July 1, 2021, when the Rules were significantly amended. As of July 1, attorneys are required to use the Wisconsin court electronic filing system in the Court of Appeals. This version of the Guide was last updated on July 1, 2021. Guide to Wisconsin Appellate Procedure for the Self-Represented Litigant - Page 2 CLERK OF THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O. BOX 1688 MADISON, WISCONSIN 53701-1688 Annette Kingsland Ziegler TELEPHONE (608) 266-1880 Lisa S. Neubauer Chief Justice Chief Judge FACSIMILE (608) 267-0640 WEB SITE: WWW.WICOURTS.GOV The goal of this Guide is to provide general information to assist individuals in understanding the appeals process and to help non-lawyers with the basic steps and procedures for filing an appeal in the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carnegie Corporation & Public Broadcasting
    Center for Strategic Philanthropy and Civil Society Teaching Case Revised: May 7, 2006 The Carnegie Corporation and Public Broadcasting (Part A) INTRODUCTION “Art, we need you. We need Carnegie on this,” said David Ives, a staffer at Boston-based educational broadcasting station WGBH. In his New York office, Carnegie Corporation officer Arthur Singer shifted the phone and listened intently as Ives continued. “There’s a real need and opportunity to create a better system for educational broadcasting, and you at the foundation can help make it happen. What do you think?” Ives and WGBH-TV Boston General Manager Hartford Gunn were drafting a speech for soon-to-be WGBH Chairman Ralph Lowell to present at a December 1964 conference on the financing of educational television stations. The conference, funded by a grant from the U.S. Office of Education, had been convened by the National Association of Educational Broadcasters (NAEB) to catalyze expanded support for educational broadcasting. Ives, Gunn, and Lowell were developing an idea for a new approach, the creation of a commission to “collect information, listen to testimony, and recommend a national policy” regarding educational television in America. Ives reminded Singer that, despite the licensing and operation of educational television stations around the country, the field was underdeveloped technologically, lacked sustainable financing, and needed institutional direction. Historically, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had been unable to overcome resistance from corporate stations and the networks – ABC, CBS, and NBC – to regulations calling for educational airtime. Singer understood that, with vision and infrastructure, educational broadcasting had the unique potential to advance learning, democratize knowledge, and celebrate the cultural life of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disinformation Age
    Steven Livingston W. LanceW. Bennett EDITED BY EDITED BY Downloaded from terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997THE DISINFORMATION AGE https://www.cambridge.org/core Politics, and Technology, Disruptive Communication in the United States the United in https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms . IP address: 170.106.202.126 . , on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36 , subject to the Cambridge Core Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997 The Disinformation Age The intentional spread of falsehoods – and attendant attacks on minorities, press freedoms, and the rule of law – challenge the basic norms and values upon which institutional legitimacy and political stability depend. How did we get here? The Disinformation Age assembles a remarkable group of historians, political scientists, and communication scholars to examine the historical and political origins of the post-fact information era, focusing on the United States but with lessons for other democracies. Bennett and Livingston frame the book by examining decades-long efforts by political and business interests to undermine authoritative institutions, including parties, elections, public agencies, science, independent journalism, and civil society groups. The other distinguished scholars explore the historical origins and workings of disinformation, along with policy challenges and the role of the legacy press in improving public communication. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. W. Lance Bennett is Professor of Political Science and Ruddick C.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Branch, Fall 2016
    Vol 24 No 3 HIGHLIGHTS REGULAR FEATURES: 5 Awards Fall 2 Justice on Wheels 10 Law Library named for retired justice 5 New faces 2 Dugan appointed to Court of Appeals 11 Aunt of OLR’s Estes honored 2016 6 Wisconsin Connects 7 Mandatory eFiling now in 23 counties 12 Juror appreciation 13 Obituaries 8 Court interpreter orientation 13 ICWA regulations update 14 News and notes 10 TAD grants to 14 more counties 14 Brief-writing contest 15 Retirements Professional development, educational opportunities abound at conference bout 345 Wisconsin judges and court staff took advantage of the many professional, learning and networkingA opportunities available to them during the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Judicial Conference, held Nov. 16-18 at the Osthoff Resort in Elkhart Lake. Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack opened the conference with the annual State of the Judiciary Address, a publication of the Wisconsin Judiciary stressing the need for increased judicial compensation. “The people of Wisconsin will benefit if we are able to attract and to retain highly skilled and knowledgeable judges. A major obstacle to satisfying this objective is judicial pay,” Roggensack said. Wisconsin was ranked 41 of 50 states in trial court judge Sheri Piontek, a court reporter for Brown County Circuit Court and salaries as of July 1, according to a study by the National president of the Wisconsin Court Reporters Association, provides Realtime reporting of Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack’s see Judicial Conference on page 3 State of the Judiciary address. Professional reporter Peggy Christianson looks on. EBDM efforts gain additional NIC support By Tommy Gubbin, Office of Court Operations isconsin’s collaborative approach to improving the effectiveness of the criminal justice system through Wevidence-based practices is being rewarded with continued support from the National Institute of Corrections (NIC).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 801 Civil Procedure — Commencement of Action and Venue
    Updated 2019−20 Wis. Stats. Published and certified under s. 35.18. October 1, 2021. 1 Updated 19−20 Wis. Stats. COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION AND VENUE 801.02 CHAPTER 801 CIVIL PROCEDURE — COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION AND VENUE 801.01 Kinds of proceedings; scope of chs. 801 to 847. 801.15 Time. 801.02 Commencement of action. 801.16 Filing. 801.03 Jurisdiction; definitions. 801.18 Electronic filing. 801.04 Jurisdictional requirements for judgments against persons, status and 801.19 Protected information in circuit court records. things. 801.20 When documents may be filed as confidential. 801.05 Personal jurisdiction, grounds for generally. 801.21 Motions to seal. 801.06 Personal jurisdiction, grounds for without service of summons. 801.50 Venue in civil actions or special proceedings. 801.07 Jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem, grounds for generally. 801.51 Challenges to improper venue. 801.08 Objection to personal jurisdiction. 801.52 Discretionary change of venue. 801.09 Summons, contents of. 801.53 Determination of motion for change of venue. 801.095 Summons form. 801.54 Discretionary transfer of civil actions to tribal court. 801.10 Summons, by whom served. 801.56 Change of venue if judge disqualified by interest. 801.11 Personal jurisdiction, manner of serving summons for. 801.58 Substitution of judge. 801.12 Jurisdiction in rem or quasi in rem, manner of serving summons for; notice 801.59 Assigned judge. of object of action. 801.61 Proceedings after order for change of venue. 801.13 Summons; when deemed served. 801.62 Conclusiveness of change of venue; second motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Hoffer: Implications for a Social Theory of Communication
    ERIC HOFFER: IMPLICATIONS FOR A SOCIAL THEORY OF COMMDNICATION by Jane Ann Fisher B.A., University of South Dakota, 1967 Submitted to the Department of Speech and Drama and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Redacted Signature Instructor in charge Redacted Signature For the Department November, 1970 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals have contributed to the progress of this research project, and it is impossible for me to ac- knowledge them all. However, there are certain people who have been especially instrumental to my completion of the study. The idea for this paper first occurred to me when I was taking a course in persuasion from Professor Donn W. Parson. He suggested to me that Eric Hoffer's philosophy had not been analyzed from the perspective of communication and that this might be fruitful ground for research. In subsequent courses, Professor Parson introduced me to the theories of the symbolic interactionists and, thus, I developed the theoretical approach which I have used in this study--that of the social theory of communication. I am grateful for this background as well as the help and advice which Professor Parson has given me while serving as my advisor. I also would like to thank Professors Berg and Hamlin, members of my thesis committee, for their support of my efforts. Thanks must go to the many graduate students at the University of Kansas who have given needed criticism as well as advice. But most importantly, without the en- couragement of my husband and parents, this project would never have reached completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit Courts of Wisconsin Handout
    Wisconsin Court System Circuit Courts of Wisconsin Article VII of the Wisconsin Constitution as amended in April 1977 creates the circuit court as a single level, unified trial court with original jurisdiction in all civil and criminal matters within the state. As of Jan. 1, 2020, covering 12,633 square Wisconsin had 249 circuit miles. In each district, court judges. Under the there is a chief judge state Constitution, circuits appointed by the are to be as compact and Supreme Court. The convenient as practicable chief judge, who may and bound by county serve up to three lines. With the exception consecutive two-year of six counties that are terms, supervises and paired together, each directs the county constitutes one administration of the circuit comprised of one district. In carrying or more branches. The six out these duties, the paired counties are chief judge is charged Buffalo/Pepin, by Supreme Court rule Florence/ Forest, and to cooperate with the Shawano/Menominee. director of state courts. The first two pairs are each staffed by a single Each chief judge judge who travels appoints a deputy chief between the courthouses. judge to act in the event Both judges for of his or her absence or Menominee County are unavailability. A located in Shawano. Of professional district the remaining circuits, 26 court administrator and have a single judge, and the largest circuit is Milwaukee a court management assistant, both employees of the County with 47 judges. director of state courts and permanently located in the district, assist the chief judge. The chief judges meet about Circuit court judges are elected to six-year terms in nine times a year as a committee, as do the district court nonpartisan spring elections.
    [Show full text]