Transcript of Today's Hearing Will Be Placed on the Committee's Website When It Becomes Available

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transcript of Today's Hearing Will Be Placed on the Committee's Website When It Becomes Available CORRECTED REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE INQUIRY INTO REMEDIES FOR THE SERIOUS INVASION OF PRIVACY IN NEW SOUTH WALES ——— At Sydney on 30 October 2015 ——— The Committee met at 10.15 a.m. ——— PRESENT The Hon. N. Maclaren-Jones (Chair) The Hon. D. J. Clarke Mr D. Shoebridge The Hon. B. Taylor The Hon. L. J. Voltz CORRECTED CHAIR: I welcome everyone to the first hearing of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice inquiry into remedies for the serious invasion of privacy in New South Wales. Before I commence I acknowledge the Gadigal people, who are the traditional custodians of this land. I pay respect to the elders past and present of the Eora nation and extend that respect to other Aboriginals present. The inquiry is examining the adequacy of existing remedies for the serious invasion of privacy in this State. The Committee's terms of reference require it to consider the adequacy of existing remedies for serious invasions of privacy, including the equitable action of breach of confidence and whether a statutory cause of action should be introduced to respond to such invasions. In addition to these issues, a number of submissions to our inquiry have alluded to the capacity of the criminal law to respond appropriately to serious invasions of privacy. Today is the first of two hearings we plan to hold for this inquiry. We will hear today from the New South Wales privacy and information commissioners, the New South Wales Council of Civil Liberties, the Australian Law Reform Commission, representatives from the legal fraternity, academics, and the Australian Privacy Foundation. Before we commence I will make some brief comments about the procedures for today's hearing. Today's hearing is open to the public and is being broadcast live via the Parliament website. A transcript of today's hearing will be placed on the Committee's website when it becomes available. In accordance with broadcasting guidelines, while members of the media may film or record Committee members and witnesses, people in the public gallery should not be the primary focus of any filming or photography. I remind media representatives that they must take responsibility for what they publish about the Committee's proceedings. It is important to remember that parliamentary privilege does not apply to what witnesses may say outside of their evidence at this hearing. I urge witnesses to be careful about any comments they may make to the media or to others after they complete their evidence as such comments would not be protected by parliamentary privilege if another person decided to take action for defamation. The guidelines for the broadcasting of proceedings are available from the secretariat. There may be some questions that a witness could only answer if they had more time or with certain documents at hand. In these circumstances witnesses are advised that they can take questions on notice and provide the answer within 21 days. I remind everyone that Committee hearings are not intended to provide a forum for people to make adverse reflections about others under the protection of parliamentary privilege. I therefore request that witnesses focus on the issues raised by the inquiry's terms of reference and avoid naming individuals unnecessarily. Our witnesses are also advised that any messages should be delivered to the Committee through the Committee staff. STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE 1 Friday 30 October 2015 CORRECTED ELIZABETH COOMBS, NSW Privacy Commissioner, Information and Privacy Commission, sworn and examined: CHAIR: Before we commence with questions would you like to make an opening statement? Dr COOMBS: I would, thank you. I hope to keep it brief. Madam Chair and members, thank you for inviting me here today to address the Committee. I am conscious that I am your first witness to appear in the public hearings. I would like to express my appreciation for this opportunity but also my very strong support for the introduction of a statutory cause of action for serious invasions of privacy. I know that you will be hearing many issues over the course of the hearings. I would like to have the opportunity to address some of the matters that might come up in some of the later hearings. I will give a brief overview of my submission to commence and then, as I said, some of those issues which I anticipate will come up. As the privacy commissioner it is my statutory role to act as an advocate for the protection of the privacy of the citizens of New South Wales. My concern is that their personal information, in addition to their broader privacy rights, is protected. I draw your attention, as a context to this inquiry, to the fact that privacy is a basic human right. Article 17 of the United Nations International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, of which Australia is a signatory, says: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation. This is the important part as well: Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. New South Wales privacy legislation does provide some protection. There is absolutely no doubt about that. My report to Parliament tabled earlier this year says that those pieces of legislation have stood the test of time well in general, but they really concern information privacy. I argue that neither the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act nor the Health Records and Information Protection Act deals sufficiently with the broader concept of privacy as described by article 17 of the declaration. Most definitely they do not deal well with the broader concept of privacy—that notion of being left alone, of the right to freedom from interference or from surveillance and the right to solitude. Privacy is increasingly becoming an asset. That is not just the view of an advocate for privacy such as me; it is proven through empirical, quantitative and respected research. Privacy is something that an individual believes gives them the right to control their lives and information about them. We as a society do not condone acts by individuals or businesses that use physical violence or threats to rob people of their property. Information about you, as set down in the Act, is an important asset. I argue that privacy in this sense deserves similar protections against theft and harm whether actual or threatened. It is all the more important in an age where we not only have technological advances but we have ever increasing technological advances. The Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act was introduced in 1998, seven years after the internet but many years before we had iPhones, smartphones, iPads, Facebook and other tools that people use in their everyday lives. We could not question that technological advancement has led to a rise both in benefits and convenience to citizens but it has also led to a rise in serious threats to their privacy—sometimes through their own actions, sometimes through the actions of other parties or business or government. It is our responsibility to try to keep up to this evolution. Data breaches intentional or otherwise are unfortunately not an uncommon occurrence. As I was walking to the train station this morning I saw a billboard saying that there had been very significant identity thefts just recently where people's tax file numbers have been stolen. The important thing is it is not just about financial information; these things have a domino effect. That information which has been stolen by one will be onsold to others and so the uses are pervasive and ongoing. I also want to spend a little bit of time on the rise of revenge porn, given the seriousness and the very offensive nature of such acts but also the fact that they have received quite broad media attention. With other breaches such as the Ashley Madison breach, the salacious nature has brought those ones to the fore. But there are other cyber attacks which affect many people, such as the one on Adobe customers that affected 38 million people worldwide of which 1.7 million were Australians. There are some more micro-level examples. One is a telco. Recently in the last couple of months there was an allegation that that telco had inappropriately accessed the personal information of a customer who also happened to be a journalist. I think many people who raise concerns about the introduction of a legal remedy for serious invasions of privacy point to common law as an avenue which currently exists. Common law most certainly has a very STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE 2 Friday 30 October 2015 CORRECTED fine and respected tradition. Common law, though, dates back to the twelfth century. Anything that is 900 years old is going to move very, very slowly. I think that is what we are seeing in the submissions which have written about why common law in itself is not sufficient. In a globalised economy where we have instant and worldwide communication, and where anyone with a smartphone can become an Internet superstar in a matter of hours, the ability of the common law to protect privacy rights, and regulate appropriately and comprehensively the appropriate use of people's information or incursions into their privacy, is hampered by a lack of flexibility and timeliness. Lord Leveson, when he came to Sydney— CHAIR: Dr Coombs, I am sorry to interrupt but I would point out that we only have limited time for questioning here today.
Recommended publications
  • Legislative Council- PROOF Page 1
    Tuesday, 15 October 2019 Legislative Council- PROOF Page 1 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Tuesday, 15 October 2019 The PRESIDENT (The Hon. John George Ajaka) took the chair at 14:30. The PRESIDENT read the prayers and acknowledged the Gadigal clan of the Eora nation and its elders and thanked them for their custodianship of this land. Governor ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT The PRESIDENT: I report receipt of a message regarding the administration of the Government. Bills ABORTION LAW REFORM BILL 2019 Assent The PRESIDENT: I report receipt of message from the Governor notifying Her Excellency's assent to the bill. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL 2019 Protest The PRESIDENT: I report receipt of the following communication from the Official Secretary to the Governor of New South Wales: GOVERNMENT HOUSE SYDNEY Wednesday, 2 October, 2019 The Clerk of the Parliaments Dear Mr Blunt, I write at Her Excellency's command, to acknowledge receipt of the Protest made on 26 September 2019, under Standing Order 161 of the Legislative Council, against the Bill introduced as the "Reproductive Health Care Reform Bill 2019" that was amended so as to change the title to the "Abortion Law Reform Bill 2019'" by the following honourable members of the Legislative Council, namely: The Hon. Rodney Roberts, MLC The Hon. Mark Banasiak, MLC The Hon. Louis Amato, MLC The Hon. Courtney Houssos, MLC The Hon. Gregory Donnelly, MLC The Hon. Reverend Frederick Nile, MLC The Hon. Shaoquett Moselmane, MLC The Hon. Robert Borsak, MLC The Hon. Matthew Mason-Cox, MLC The Hon. Mark Latham, MLC I advise that Her Excellency the Governor notes the protest by the honourable members.
    [Show full text]
  • (Legislative Council, 24 November 2011, Proof) POLICE
    Full Day Hansard Transcript (Legislative Council, 24 November 2011, Proof) Proof Extract from NSW Legislative Council Hansard and Papers Thursday, 24 November 2011 (Proof). POLICE AMENDMENT (DEATH AND DISABILITY) BILL 2011 Second Reading Debate resumed from 23 November 2011. The Hon. ROBERT BROWN [8.04 p.m.]: I am happy to make a contribution in relation to the Police Amendment (Death and Disability) Bill 2011. A considerable amount of work has been done during this week by the Minister for Police and Emergency Services and his staff and the Police Association. I have a sense that we are there. Let me define there: My left hand is stretched out to the left-hand side of my body, and that is where the Government started; my right hand is stretched out to the right-hand side of my body, and that is where the Police Association started. They are not in the middle but they are somewhere closer to where the Police Association probably wants to be for its members than I thought was possible a week ago. We have attempted to test the Government's position on the issues that the Police Association has brought to the Christian Democratic Party and the Shooters and Fishers Party. We have done that this week in a number of meetings with both parties individually and with both parties in the same room. Neither the Christian Democratic Party nor the Shooters and Fishers Party have members who are professional advocates—although both Mr Borsak and I have done quite a bit of that sort of thing in our time in business—and it has been an extremely difficult process.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Today's Hearing Will Be Placed on the Committee's Website When It Becomes Available
    REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS BEFORE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MANAGEMENT OF THE POWERHOUSE MUSEUM AND OTHER MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL PROJECTS IN NEW SOUTH WALES INQUIRY INTO THE GOVERNMENT'S MANAGEMENT OF THE POWERHOUSE MUSEUM AND OTHER MUSEUMS AND CULTURAL PROJECTS IN NEW SOUTH WALES UNCORRECTED At Jubilee Room, Parliament House, Sydney on Monday, 15 February 2021 The Committee met at 9:15 am PRESENT The Hon. Robert Borsak (Chair) The Hon. Ben Franklin The Hon. Rose Jackson The Hon. Trevor Khan The Hon. Taylor Martin The Hon. Walt Secord Mr David Shoebridge (Deputy Chair) Monday, 15 February 2021 Legislative Council - UNCORRECTED Page 1 The CHAIR: Welcome to the fifth hearing of the Select Committee on the Government's management of the Powerhouse Museum and other museums and cultural projects in New South Wales. The inquiry is examining issues surrounding the Government's proposal for the Powerhouse Museum and support for the State's museums and cultural sector more broadly. Before I commence, I would like to acknowledge the Gadigal people, who are the traditional custodians of this land. I would also like to pay respect to the Elders past and present of the Eora nation and extend that respect to other Aboriginals present. This morning we will hear from Government witnesses from the arts and infrastructure portfolios, including the Hon. Don Harwin, MLC, followed by the chairman of Western Sydney Powerhouse Museum Community Alliance. After lunch we will hear evidence from the CFMMEU, a flood expert and a Parramatta councillor. Before we commence I would like to make some brief comments about the procedures for today's hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Nsw State Budget Estimates – Relevant Committee Members
    2019 NSW STATE BUDGET ESTIMATES – RELEVANT COMMITTEE MEMBERS There are seven “portfolio” committees who run the budget estimate questioning process. These committees correspond to various specific Ministries and portfolio areas, so there may be a range of Ministers, Secretaries, Deputy Secretaries and senior public servants from several Departments and Authorities who will appear before each committee. The different parties divide up responsibility for portfolio areas in different ways, so some minor party MPs sit on several committees, and the major parties may have MPs with titles that don’t correspond exactly. We have omitted the names of the Liberal and National members of these committees, as the Alliance is seeking to work with the Opposition and cross bench (non-government) MPs for Budget Estimates. Government MPs are less likely to ask questions that have embarrassing answers. Victor Dominello [Lib, Ryde], Minister for Customer Services (!) is the minister responsible for Liquor and Gaming. Kevin Anderson [Nat, Tamworth], Minister for Better Regulation, which is located in the super- ministry group of Customer Services, is responsible for Racing. Sophie Cotsis [ALP, Canterbury] is the Shadow for Better Public Services, including Gambling, Julia Finn [ALP, Granville] is the Shadow for Consumer Protection including Racing (!). Portfolio Committee no. 6 is the relevant committee. Additional information is listed beside each MP. Bear in mind, depending on the sitting timetable (committees will be working in parallel), some MPs will substitute in for each other – an MP who is not on the standing committee but who may have a great deal of knowledge might take over questioning for a session.
    [Show full text]
  • EMAIL ADDRESS Postal Address for All Upper House Members
    TITLE NAME EMAIL ADDRESS Phone Postal Address for all Upper House Members: Parliament House, 6 Macquarie St, Sydney NSW, 2000 Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party The Hon. Robert Borsak [email protected] (02) 9230 2850 The Hon. Robert Brown [email protected] (02) 9230 3059 Liberal Party The Hon. John Ajaka [email protected] (02) 9230 2300 The Hon. Lou Amato [email protected] (02) 9230 2764 The Hon. David Clarke [email protected] (02) 9230 2260 The Hon. Catherine Cusack [email protected] (02) 9230 2915 The Hon. Scott Farlow [email protected] (02) 9230 3786 The Hon. Don Harwin [email protected] (02) 9230 2080 Mr Scot MacDonald [email protected] (02) 9230 2393 The Hon. Natasha Maclaren-Jones [email protected] (02) 9230 3727 The Hon. Shayne Mallard [email protected] (02) 9230 2434 The Hon. Taylor Martin [email protected] 02 9230 2985 The Hon. Matthew Mason-Cox [email protected] (02) 9230 3557 The Hon. Greg Pearce [email protected] (02) 9230 2328 The Hon. Dr Peter Phelps [email protected] (02) 9230 3462 National Party: The Hon. Niall Blair [email protected] (02) 9230 2467 The Hon. Richard Colless [email protected] (02) 9230 2397 The Hon. Wes Fang [email protected] (02) 9230 2888 The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio Committee No. 4 – Legal Affairs
    REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS BEFORE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE NO. 4 – LEGAL AFFAIRS EMERGENCY SERVICES AGENCIES UNCORRECTED PROOF At Macquarie Room, Parliament House, Sydney on Monday, 18 September 2017 The Committee met at 12:00 PRESENT The Hon. R. Borsak (Chair) The Hon. D. Clarke The Hon. C. Cusack The Hon. G. Donnelly The Hon. T. Khan The Hon. P. Primrose Mr D. Shoebridge The Hon. L. Voltz Monday, 18 September 2017 Legislative Council Page 1 The CHAIR: Welcome to the first hearing of Portfolio Committee No. 4 inquiring into emergency services agencies. Before I commence I would like to acknowledge the Gadigal people who are the traditional custodians of this land. I would also like to pay respect to elders past and present of the Eora nation and extend that respect to other Aboriginals present. The Committee is here today because our inquiry is considering the policy response to bullying, harassment and discrimination in emergency services agencies, including the NSW Rural Fire Service, Fire and Rescue NSW, the NSW Police Force, the Ambulance Service of NSW and the NSW State Emergency Service. This includes examining the prevalence of the issue, the effectiveness of what is in place to manage and resolve such complaints, along with what support is available for victims, workers and volunteers of emergency services agencies. Today is the first of several hearings we plan to hold for this inquiry. We will hear today from representatives of the Volunteer Fire Fighters Association, representatives from the NSW Rural Fire Service Association and senior officers from the NSW Rural Fire Service. I would like also to make some brief comments about the procedures for today's hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Today's Hearing Will Be Placed on the Committee's Website When It Becomes Available
    REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS BEFORE PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO INTEGRITY, EFFICACY AND VALUE FOR MONEY OF NSW GOVERNMENT GRANT PROGRAMS CORRECTED At Jubilee Room, Parliament House, Sydney on Friday 16 October 2020 The Committee met at 9:00 am PRESENT The Hon. John Graham (Acting Chair) The Hon. Trevor Khan The Hon. Courtney Houssos The Hon. Matthew Mason-Cox The Hon. Natalie Ward PRESENT VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE The Hon. Lou Amato Mr David Shoebridge Friday, 16 October 2020 Legislative Council Page 1 CORRECTED The ACTING CHAIR: Welcome to the second hearing of the Public Accountability Committee's inquiry into integrity, efficacy and value for money of New South Wales Government grant programs. Before I commence I acknowledge the Gadigal people who are the traditional custodians of this land. I also pay respect to Elders of the Eora nation past, present and emerging, and I extend that respect to other First Nation people present. Today's hearing will focus on local council and Government grant programs. We will hear from the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the Auditor-General and the Department of Regional NSW. Before we commence I will make some brief comments about the procedures. Today's hearing is being broadcast live via the Parliament's website. A transcript of today's hearing will be placed on the Committee's website when it becomes available. I note that I am serving today as Acting Chair, as we are joined by the Chair of the Committee, Mr David Shoebridge, via teleconference. Other Committee members are either present or joining us shortly. Parliament House is now open to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislation Review Committee
    REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS BEFORE LEGISLATION REVIEW COMMITTEE OPERATION OF THE LEGISLATION REVIEW ACT 1987 At Sydney on Monday 21 May 2018 The Committee met at 9.15 a.m. PRESENT Mr James Griffin (Chair) Mr Lee Evans Ms Melanie Gibbons Mr Michael Johnsen Mr David Mehan The Hon. Shaoquet Moselmane Mr David Shoebridge Monday, 21 May 2018 Legislative Assembly Page 2 GEORGE JOHN WILLIAMS, AO, Dean, UNSW Law, and Foundation Director, Tobin Centre of Public Law, affirmed and examined AARON FRANCIS TAVERNITI, former Social Justice Intern, UNSW Law and Gilbert and Tobin Centre of Public Law, affirmed and examined The CHAIR: I declare the hearing open. Thank you for attending this public hearing of the Legislation Review Committee. Today the Committee will be taking evidence in relation to its inquiry into the Operation of the Legislation Review Act 1987. This inquiry will focus on the operation of the Act and consider measures that would improve the Committee's review functions under it. My name is James Griffin. I am the Chair of the Committee and the member for Manly. I am joined by Mr Lee Evans, the deputy chair and member for Heathcote; Mr Michael Johnsen, the member for Upper Hunter; the Hon. Shaoquett Moselmane, MLC; Mr David Shoebridge, MLC; and Mr David Mehan, the member for The Entrance. I have apologies from the Hon. Natasha Maclaren- Jones, and Ms Melanie Gibbons will be with us shortly. The Committee has resolved to authorise the media to broadcast sound and video excerpts of its public proceedings. Copies of the guidelines governing coverage of proceedings are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Will Be Placed on the Committee's Website When It Becomes Available
    REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS BEFORE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL ISSUES REVIEW OF THE HERITAGE ACT 1977 UNCORRECTED Fully Virtual Hearing via Videoconference on Monday 2 August 2021 The Committee met at 9:30 PRESENT The Hon. Peter Poulos (Chair) The Hon. Mark Buttigieg (Deputy Chair) The Hon. Trevor Khan The Hon. Shayne Mallard The Hon Taylor Martin Reverend the Hon. Fred Nile The Hon. Peter Primrose The Hon. Walt Secord Mr David Shoebridge Monday, 2 August 2021 Legislative Council Page 1 UNCORRECTED The CHAIR: Welcome to the virtual hearing for the review of the Heritage Act 1977. Before I commence, I acknowledge the Gadigal people of the Eora nation, who are the traditional custodians of this land. I pay respect to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to other Aboriginal people present. Today's hearing will be the first ever fully virtual hearing by a Legislative Council committee. This enables the work of the Committee to continue during the COVID-19 pandemic, without compromising the health and safety of members, witnesses and staff. As we break new ground with technology, I ask for everyone's patience through any technical difficulties we may encounter today. If participants lose their internet connection and are disconnected from the virtual hearing, they are asked to rejoin the hearing by using the same link as provided by the Committee secretariat. Today we will hear from Government witnesses, including the Hon. Don Harwin, MLC, Minister for the Public Service and Employee Relations, Aboriginal Affairs and the Arts, and Special Minister of State, together with Ms Kate Foy, Deputy Secretary, Community Engagement, Department of Premier and Cabinet, and Mr Matthew Clark, Director, Heritage Strategy and Policy, Heritage NSW, Community Engagement, Department of Premier and Cabinet.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 20 July 2020 the Honourable G
    20 July 2020 The Honourable G. Berejiklian Premier of New South Wales 52 Martin Place Sydney, 2000 NSW MODERN SLAVERY ACT 2018 SHOULD COME INTO FORCE Dear Premier Berejiklian, We, the under-signed 76 organisations, representatives and 40 individuals, urge you as leader of the Government of NSW to expedite the passage of this Act so that it can be brought into force on 1 January 2021, as recommended by the Inquiry Report submitted by the Standing Committee on Social Issues on 25 March 2020. Bringing the Act into effect on 1 January 2021 represents an avoidable delay of two and a half years since the original Act was passed and assented. In that time, hundreds of thousands if not millions of people, both here in Australia and internationally, will have been deceived into a life of slavery. It is imperative that the Act is not delayed any longer. The Standing Committee recognises that the NSW Modern Slavery Act is an important addition to the Commonwealth Act. This legislation positions NSW as a world leader in addressing modern slavery and in the wake of COVID-19 should inform your Government’s job creation initiatives to create better working conditions and prevent the scourge of modern slavery here and overseas. The Inquiry’s recommendations have received broad support, and there appears to be no reason why the legislative amendments cannot be drafted as a matter of urgency and brought before the Legislative Council and Assembly without further delay. Research is clear that with more people out of work, more people will be prepared or pressured to accept lower workplace standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter 4 June 2019
    OPEN LETTER Hon. David Elliott MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services Dear Minister, We are writing to outline our concerns about the rise in the use and application of strip searches in New South Wales. Various legal services have observed an increase in the use of strip searches where police have failed to ensure the preservation of privacy and dignity as required by law. The application and overuse of strip searches in NSW has also led the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (LECC) to commence an investigation into the use of police powers to conduct strip searches under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) (LEPRA). Recent figures reveal the number of strip searches in NSW has increased from 3,735 in 2014-15 to 5,483 in 2017-18. This is an increase of nearly 47 per cent.1 Outlined below are our key concerns about current strip search practice in NSW: 1 Parliament of NSW, House Business Papers, Questions & Answers Paper No. 181, 2517 – Police- Police Strip Searches, Greens MP David Shoebridge, 14 November 2018. 2 1. A child as young as ten years of age and up to 18 years can be required to take off all their clothes in front of two adult police officers in an unfamiliar environment. The law fails to reflect child protection principles. 2. For those who have been exposed to child or adult sexual abuse, sexual assault or domestic violence a strip search can be a trigger for further trauma. 3. A strip search may be requested by a junior officer without requiring any authorisation from a more senior officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Procedure Committee of the NSW Legislative Council on the Contentious Bills Motion of the 20Th June 2019
    Percy Allan AM Chair, Evidence Based Policy Research Project An Independent Research Project facilitated by The newDemocracy Foundation (https://www.newdemocracy.com.au/our-work/477-evidence-based-policy) Private Contact Details: 10 St Mary’s Street, Balmain East, NSW 2041 E: [email protected] T: 0298106346 M: 0411727331 W: percyallan.com.au 8th October 2019 Chair: Ajaka, John (LIB, LC Member) Members: Borsak, Robert (SFF, LC Member), Buttigieg, Mark (ALP, LC Member); Faehrmann, Cate (GRNS, LC Member); Harwin, Don (LIB, LC Member); Hurst, Emma (AJP, LC Member); Khan, Trevor (NAT, LC Member); Maclaren-Jones, Natasha (LIB, LC Member); Mallard, Shayne (LIB, LC Member); Mitchell, Sarah (NAT, LC Member); Moselmane, Shaoquett (ALP, LC Member); Nile, Fred (CDP, LC Member); Searle, Adam (ALP, LC Member); and Sharpe, Penny (ALP, LC Member). Submission to the Procedure Committee of the NSW Legislative Council on the Contentious Bills Motion of the 20th June 2019 The Hon John Ajaka and members of the Procedures Committee, This submission is on behalf of the Steering Committee of the Evidence Based Policy Research Project, an independent research initiative facilitated by the newDemocracy Foundation as part of its broad remit to seek improvements to the functioning of Australian democracy. It builds on the submission that was made earlier this year to political party leaders in the NSW Legislative Council before the Council passed a motion on the treatment of Contentious Bills that was referred to the Procedures Committee for inquiry and reporting. 1 Issue How to manage contentious Bills introduced in the NSW Legislative Council to ensure they are evidence and consultative based.
    [Show full text]