Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Transitioning Methadone-Treated Infants from an Inpatient to an Outpatient Setting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Transitioning Methadone-Treated Infants from an Inpatient to an Outpatient Setting Journal of Perinatology (2012) 32, 425–430 r 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. 0743-8346/12 www.nature.com/jp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Neonatal abstinence syndrome: transitioning methadone-treated infants from an inpatient to an outpatient setting CH Backes1, CR Backes2, D Gardner1, CA Nankervis1, PJ Giannone1 and L Cordero1 1Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA and 2College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA Journal of Perinatology (2012) 32, 425–430; doi:10.1038/jp.2011.114; Objective: Each year in the US B50 000 neonates receive inpatient published online 18 August 2011 pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a Keywords: neonatal withdrawal; methadone treatment; outpatient traditional inpatient only approach with a combined inpatient and weaning outpatient methadone treatment program. Study Design: Retrospective review (2007 to 2009). Infants were born to mothers maintained on methadone in an antenatal substance abuse Introduction program. All infants received methadone for NAS treatment as inpatient. Methadone weaning for the traditional group (75 patients) was inpatient, Opioid dependence during pregnancy has significant implications whereas the combined group (46 patients) was outpatient. for the infant, most notably neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).1,2 NAS is a constellation of physiological signs and Result: Infants in the traditional and combined groups were similar in behaviors observed following in utero exposure to opiates.1,3 demographics, obstetrical risk factors, birth weight, gestational age (GA) Although the recreational and addictive use of opiates during and the incidence of prematurity (34 and 31%). Hospital stay was shorter pregnancy continues to receive more attention in the medical in the combined than in the traditional group (13 vs 25 days; P<0.01). community, prescription narcotic use among women of Although the duration of treatment was longer for infants in the childbearing age has increased significantly.4 Among exposed combined group (37 vs 21days, P<0.01), the cumulative methadone dose À1 infants, the incidence of NAS ranges from 21 to 94%, with about was similar (3.6 vs 3.1 mg kg , P ¼ 0.42). Follow-up information half of the infants requiring some form of pharmacotherapy.5–7 (at least 3 months) was available for 80% of infants in the traditional and In the United States, the number of drug affected newborns 100% of infants in the combined group. All infants in the combined group (including opiates) has increased 300% since the 1980s and the were seen p72 h from hospital discharge. Breastfeeding was more health care expenditure in their treatment has been estimated to be common among infants in the combined group (24 vs 8% P<0.05). as much as 112.6 million dollars per year.2,5 Much of this cost is Following discharge there were no differences between the two groups in because of prolonged hospital stays in neonatal intensive hospital readmissions for NAS. Prematurity (34 to 36 weeks GA) was the care units.7,8 only predictor for hospital readmission for NAS in both groups (P ¼ 0.02, The benefits of participating in an antenatal drug treatment OR 5). Average hospital cost for each infant in the combined group was program include a reduction in drug-seeking behavior, illicit $13 817 less than in the traditional group. substance abuse, preterm birth and infant mortality.9–12 Methadone Conclusion: A combined inpatient and outpatient methadone treatment use for narcotic-abusing women in an antenatal program improves in the management of NAS decreases hospital stay and substantially health care utilization and preparation for parenting responsibilities, reduces cost. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the potential long- although some continue to misuse illicit substances.13,14 term benefits of the combined approach on infants and their families. In clinical practice, NAS is commonly observed among infants born to mothers on methadone maintenance for opiate addiction.2,15 Traditional strategies for the care of infants with NAS Correspondence: Dr L Cordero, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of have focused mainly on inpatient management that has led to Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, N118 Doan Hall, prolonged hospital stays (that is, median of 25 days, range of 8 to 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1228, USA. 105 days).7,15–18 However, following initial stabilization, many E-mail: [email protected] Received 7 March 2011; revised 30 June 2011; accepted 11 July 2011; published online infants with NAS are otherwise healthy and may not require 11,13,18,19 18 August 2011 intensive inpatient care. Considering that prolonged Neonatal abstinence syndrome CH Backes et al 426 hospital stays limit opportunities for maternal–infant bonding and achieved 3 scores X8 or 2 scores X12. The dose was increased consume hospital resources, alternative strategies that reduce (0.025 to 0.05 mg kgÀ1 per dose, maximum dose 0.15 mg kgÀ1 unnecessary hospitalization are highly desirable.7,13,20–22 A recent per day) and the interval was changed to every 8 h if the national survey of the management of NAS in the United Kingdom withdrawal score remained >8. If NAS scores continued to be >12, and Ireland revealed that 29% of neonatal units discharge infants’ phenobarbital was added (10 mg kgÀ1 per load, 5 mg kgÀ1 per day home on medication.19 Other investigators reported no adverse maintenance). Non-pharmacological management, including events among infants with NAS administered medication by their swaddling, pacifier use and provision of a quiet environment, was caregivers in the community setting.23 However, the paucity of also used for both groups.21 available data on the safety, feasibility and resources required to care for infants with NAS on an outpatient basis has limited Traditional group: inpatient methadone weaning strategy widespread adoption of this approach. For infants in the traditional group methadone was decreased by These issues affecting the general medical community led to the 0.025 to 0. 05 mg kgÀ1 per dose every 3 days if the average development of a multidisciplinary combined inpatient and withdrawal score (in a 24-h period) remained <8. When the outpatient treatment program for infants with NAS. An attending maintenance dose was 0.05 mg kgÀ1 twice daily, the dosage physician (CRB) willing to care for these infants as outpatients interval was lengthened to once daily. NAS scores continued to be following initial inpatient stabilization offered this option to monitored and methadone was discontinued after 3 to 7 days of mothers in an antepartum substance abuse program. The purpose 0.05 mg kgÀ1 per day if the average score remained <8. Once the of this paper is to compare the safety and efficacy of a traditional infant was successfully weaned off methadone, an additional inpatient only approach vs a combined inpatient and outpatient 5- to 7-day period of monitoring for withdrawal was completed weaning strategy for infants with NAS. before discharge home. Following discharge infants in the traditional group were seen in primary care clinics and/or at a dedicated NAS clinic (Nationwide Children’s Hospital) where a Methods team of physicians, nurses, social workers, lactation specialists and This was a retrospective review conducted at The Ohio State physical/occupational therapists were available. University Medical Center between January 2007 and January 2009. This investigation was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Combined group: outpatient methadone weaning strategy Outpatient records (private physician, primary care clinics and To be included in the combined group infants and caregivers had emergency room) were also used. to fulfill specific medical and social work criteria (Figure 1). As a The Ohio State University Medical Center is a tertiary referral safeguard, only the amount of methadone needed for 3 days before center for obstetrics and gynecology, serving a population of the infant’s initial outpatient appointment was prescribed. All B9 00 000, with over 5000 births per year. We identified 244 caregivers underwent intensive instruction on administration of infants born to women receiving methadone as part of an methadone for their infants and were made aware of the symptoms antenatal outpatient treatment program. Of these infants 121 of drug overdose or withdrawal. Methadone was prescribed weekly (50%) required treatment for NAS. Infants exposed in utero to and dispensed from the hospital pharmacy in sealed, unit dose illicit drugs (that is, cocaine, heroin and so on) only were oral syringes. excluded. To ensure the validity of the maternal history provided, Following discharge infants in the combined group were seen in infants had a meconium or urine toxicology performed another dedicated outpatient clinic by the same physician (CRB) immediately after birth. that provided inpatient care. This clinic is staffed by trained nurses and had ancillary staff (social workers, lactation specialists and Initial inpatient management of NAS physical/occupational therapists) available for consultation. In the On the basis of attending physician preference, we have two outpatient clinic, a comprehensive evaluation of the infants’ treatment strategies for infants with NAS at our hospital. We general health (anthropomorphic data, physical examination) and identified 75 infants who received methadone for NAS entirely in state of abstinence using the Finnegan method was performed. the inpatient setting (traditional group) and 46 infants who When possible, scores were obtained immediately after feeding. initially received methadone treatment as inpatients then Caregivers were asked to keep records of their infants’ behaviors in completed the weaning process in the outpatient setting (combined the home setting and had 24 h access to their physician (CRB) to group). The initial hospital management of infants with NAS was immediately address any concerns.
Recommended publications
  • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Guideline
    Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome MENU Introduction Incidence and risk factors 1. Risk factors for illicit drug use 2. Risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes 3. Risk factors for neonatal abstinence syndrome Consequences 1. Tobacco 2. Alcohol 3. Amphetamines 4. Cocaine and derivatives 5. Marijuana 6. Opiates 7. Polydrug use Diagnosis 1. Drug use in pregnancy 2. Testing of newborns 3. Diagnosis of withdrawal Interventions 1. Antenatal care a. Treatment of pregnant users of illicit drugs b. Smoking in pregnancy c. Support from caregivers for pregnant women abusing drugs 2. Postnatal care 3. Pharmacological treatment a. Opioid withdrawal: MORPHINE REGIMEN b. Non-opioid CNS depressants: PHENOBARBITONE REGIMEN c. Management of the vomiting baby Discharge The Drug use in pregnancy team Infant protection issues Follow-Up Keypoints References Introduction: Pregnant women using drugs have the same anxieties and expectations as other pregnant women. All women using drugs are entitled to accurate information, and to be treated sensitively in a non-judgmental manner. Maternal illicit drug use is a risk factor for adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes including preterm birth. Infants born to mothers using illicit drugs (and alcohol and tobacco) are at risk of the toxic effects of the drugs both in-utero and ex-utero; adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes related to the poor socioeconomic situations and lifestyle factors associated with illicit drug use; neonatal drug withdrawal; and the subsequent poor outcomes of infants reared in a socioeconomically disadvantaged environment. The Report of the US Preventative Services Task Force 1996 1 and the monograph review by Bell and Lau 2 1995 are used as background for the content of this guideline.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: Retrospective Study of Two Institutions in the USA
    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016176 on 27 September 2017. Downloaded from Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA Enrique Gomez Pomar,1 Loretta P Finnegan,2 Lori Devlin,3 Henrietta Bada,1 Vanessa A Concina,1 Katrina T Ibonia,1 Philip M Westgate4 To cite: Gomez Pomar E, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Finnegan LP, Devlin L, et al. Objective To develop a simplified Finnegan Neonatal Simplification of the Finnegan Abstinence Scoring System (sFNAS) that will highly ► A simplified scoring system (simplified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring correlate with scores ≥8 and ≥12 in infants being System: retrospective Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (sFNAS)) is assessed with the FNAS. study of two institutions proposed developed from a large data set and cross- Design, setting and participants This is a in the USA. BMJ Open validated using a database from another institution. retrospective analysis involving 367 patients admitted to 2017;7:e016176. doi:10.1136/ ► Cutoff values are provided for the sFNAS which two level IV neonatal intensive care units with a total of bmjopen-2017-016176 predict the cutoff value. 40 294 observations. Inclusion criteria included neonates ► The retrospective nature of our study requires ► Prepublication history for with gestational age ≥37 0/7 weeks, who are being this paper is available online. prospective validation of the inter-rater reliability of assessed for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) using To view these files, please visit the sFNAS and also the clinical validity of this tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Resource: CARE of the NEWBORN EXPOSED to SUBSTANCES DURING PREGNANCY
    Care of the Newborn Exposed to Substances During Pregnancy Practice Resource for Health Care Providers November 2020 Practice Resource: CARE OF THE NEWBORN EXPOSED TO SUBSTANCES DURING PREGNANCY © 2020 Perinatal Services BC Suggested Citation: Perinatal Services BC. (November 2020). Care of the Newborn Exposed to Substances During Pregnancy: Instructional Manual. Vancouver, BC. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced for commercial purposes without prior written permission from Perinatal Services BC. Requests for permission should be directed to: Perinatal Services BC Suite 260 1770 West 7th Avenue Vancouver, BC V6J 4Y6 T: 604-877-2121 F: 604-872-1987 [email protected] www.perinatalservicesbc.ca This manual was designed in partnership by UBC Faculty of Medicine’s Division of Continuing Professional Development (UBC CPD), Perinatal Services BC (PSBC), BC Women’s Hospital & Health Centre (BCW) and Fraser Health. Content in this manual was derived from module 3: Care of the newborn exposed to substances during pregnancy in the online module series, Perinatal Substance Use, available from https://ubccpd.ca/course/perinatal-substance-use Perinatal Services BC Care of the Newborn Exposed to Substances During Pregnancy ii Limitations of Scope Iatrogenic opioid withdrawal: Infants recovering from serious illness who received opioids and sedatives in the hospital may experience symptoms of withdrawal once the drug is discontinued or tapered too quickly. While these infants may benefit from the management strategies discussed in this module, the ESC Care Tool is intended for newborns with prenatal substance exposure. Language A note about gender and sexual orientation terminology: In this module, the terms pregnant women and pregnant individual are used.
    [Show full text]
  • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
    Section 9: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Women with opioid use disorders, whether receiving medication assisted treatment with methadone or buprenorphine, or using illicitly, should receive prenatal education about neonatal abstinence syndrome in preparation for birth and newborn care. Key points • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), also known as Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS), refers to a cluster of symptoms due to neonatal withdrawal after chronic prenatal exposure to opioids, whether prescribed or non-prescribed. • NAS symptoms mirror symptoms experienced by adults in withdrawal: neurologic symptoms including anxiety/irritability, and seizures; rhinnorhea/sneezing; gastrointestinal symptoms. • More severe NAS symptoms are associated with polysubstance use and/or the use of illit opioids • Buprenorphine is associated with similar rates but later onset, shorter duration, and less severe NAS symptoms than methadone in most studies (Jones, Kaltenbach, Heil, et al, 2010) • There appears to be no significant difference in NAS symptoms for infants exposed to buprenorphine monoproduct compared to buprenorphine-naloxone (Jumah, Edwards, Balfour- Boehm, et al, 2016; Debelak, Morrone, O’Grady, et al, 2013) although research is limited • There is no clear association between methadone or buprenorphine dose and severity of NAS symptoms (Jones, Kaltenbach, Heil, et al, 2010; Jones, Deppen, Hudak, et al 2014) • With appropriate treatment, NAS is a time-limited condition. Research about long term neurodevelopmental effects is ongoing, but results so far are reassuring (Kocherlakota, 2014). • Nonpharmacologic care is the first line of treatment for NAS, and includes maximizing skin to skin contact, rooming-in with mother, a quiet environment, and breastfeeding unless contraindicated (Kocherlakota, 2014; Patrick, Schumacher, Horbar, et al 2016) • Pharmacologic treatment is required if symptoms escalate and cause functional difficulty for the infant (see discussion of Eating, Sleeping, and Consoling Care Tool, below).
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Policy: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Guidelines Reference Number: CP.MP.86 Revision Log Date of Last Revision: 09/21
    CEN,:'ENI;'" ~orporation Clinical Policy: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Guidelines Reference Number: CP.MP.86 Revision Log Date of Last Revision: 09/21 See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Maternal drug use and intrauterine exposure of the fetus during pregnancy can lead to drug withdrawal in the infant after delivery. Clinically important neonatal withdrawal most commonly results from intrauterine opioid exposure. However, maternal use of central nervous system depressants (e.g., benzodiazepines, barbiturates and alcohol) and other drugs also results in signs of neonatal symptoms/withdrawal in exposed infants. Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), describes opioid-only withdrawal symptoms while Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) describes neonates who are at-risk for poly-substance exposure, including opioids. The term NAS will be used here for both polysubstance and opioid-only exposure. Signs of withdrawal will develop in 55 - 94% of neonates exposed to opioids in utero. Typical signs of withdrawal from specific drugs occur based on the half-lives of elimination of the drug. Maternal use of multiple drugs during pregnancy will also have an impact on the onset and severity of NAS. In general though, if one week has elapsed between the last maternal opioid use and delivery, the incidence of NAS is relatively low. Table 1 below lists common drugs abused along with the typical onset of NAS symptoms. Table 1. Common Drug NAS Symptom Onset Drug Typical onset Heroin Within 24 hrs with delay up to 5-7 days or later Methadone 24-72 hrs with delay up to 5-7 days later Morphine & Hydrocodone Within 3 days Buprenorphine Within 40 hrs Ethanol 3-12 hrs Barbiturate 4-7 days with delay up to 14 days Diazepam 12 days Chlordiazepoxide 21 days Policy/Criteria I.
    [Show full text]
  • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Therapeutic Interventions
    Juli Sublett, MSN, RN Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Therapeutic Interventions Abstract Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) occurs in infants exposed to opiates or illicit drugs during pregnancy. It can be severe and cause long hospital stays after birth and with symptoms up to 6 months after birth. Pharmaco- logic interventions are commonly used as treatment for NAS; however, their safety and effi cacy are not fully recognized. Pharmacologic treatments for NAS include medications such as methadone, buprenorphine, morphine, and phenobar- bital. Nonpharmacologic interventions and complementary therapies have been documented in neonates. However, there are gaps in the literature regarding use of these thera- pies for neonatal withdrawal. This article provides an overview of the possible risks, benefi ts, and outcomes of pharmacologic and complementary therapies in the neonatal population, and illustrates the gaps in knowledge related to their use for neonatal withdrawal. Keywords: Complementary alternative therapy; Neonatal Absti- nence Syndrome; Pharmacology; Supportive care interventions. Tetra Images/Alamy Tetra 102 volume 38 | number 2 March/April 2013 Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. ince the 1980s, the incidence of Neonatal Kaltenbach (2010) refute the idea of gender difference Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) has increased in their research. They state that NAS severity or the by 300% (Backes et al., 2012). NAS is a con- need for treatment is not associated with the sex of the dition in which infants undergo withdrawal infant after performing a large retrospective chart after exposure to prescription or nonprescrip- review of 308 NAS infants. tion opioids such as methadone or heroin in Sutero.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Standard Scoring of Infants Using the Finnegan Scoring Tool
    Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Standard Scoring of Infants using the Finnegan Scoring Tool Welcome to Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome - Standard Scoring of Newborns using the Modified Finnegan Scoring Tool • This Computer Based Learning (CBL) Module is designed to be used as a self study guide. • The goal of this self study guide is to improve our care of babies at risk for NAS by improving the consistency with which we score these babies. • This CBL includes some basic information about NAS and step by step instructions for using the Modified Finnegan Scoring Tool Part 1: Facing the Problem • Drug use in women is an increasingly important problem in our society. Although reports of drug use are generally lower among pregnant women than non- pregnant women, it has been reported that among pregnant women ages 15-44: – 4.5% report use of illicit drugs – 11.9% report binge or heavy drinking – 15.3 report tobacco use Newborn Exposures • Drug use among pregnant women can lead to problems in the developing fetus including congenital anomalies, problems with growth, preterm labor, withdrawal or toxicity in the newborn, and later problems with neurodevelopment. One of the most readily apparent problems created by in utero exposure to drugs is neonatal abstinence syndrome. Like the rates of maternal drug use, the rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome are increasing • Number of infants coded at discharge with NAS – 7,653 in 1995 – 11,937 in 2008 Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) describes withdrawal of the newborn from drugs that the mother was taking during pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Clinical Guideline
    Neonatal abstinence syndrome Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Guideline: Neonatal abstinence syndrome Document title: Neonatal abstinence syndrome Publication date: August 2010 Document number: MN10.10-V4-R15 Document The document supplement is integral to and should be read in conjunction supplement: with this guideline Amendments Full version history is supplied in the document supplement Amendment date August 2013 Replaces document: MN10.10-V3-R15 Author: Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines Program Audience: Health professionals in Queensland public and private maternity services Review date: August 2015 Statewide Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Network Endorsed by: QH Patient Safety and Quality Executive Committee Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Guidelines Program at: Contact: Email: [email protected] URL: www.health.qld.gov.au/qcg Disclaimer These guidelines have been prepared to promote and facilitate standardisation and consistency of practice, using a multidisciplinary approach. Information in this guideline is current at time of publication. Queensland Health does not accept liability to any person for loss or damage incurred as a result of reliance upon the material contained in this guideline. Clinical material offered in this guideline does not replace or remove clinical judgement or the professional care and duty necessary for each specific patient case. Clinical care carried out in accordance with this guideline should be provided within the context of locally available resources and expertise. This Guideline does not address all elements of standard practice and assumes that individual clinicians are responsible to: · Discuss care with consumers in an environment that is culturally appropriate and which enables respectful confidential discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
    Child and Adolescent Health Service Neonatology CLINICAL GUIDELINE Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) Scope (Staff): Nursing and Medical Staff Scope (Area): NICU KEMH, NICU PCH, NETS WA Child Safe Organisation Statement of Commitment The Child and Adolescent Health Service (CAHS) commits to being a child safe organisation by meeting the National Child Safe Principles and National Child Safe Standards. This is a commitment to a strong culture supported by robust policies and procedures to ensure the safety and wellbeing of children at CAHS. This document should be read in conjunction with this DISCLAIMER Contents Background ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Diagnoisis of NAS ........................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment and Care After Birth .................................................................................................... 4 Infant Resiscitation .............................................................................................................. 4 NAS Scoring ................................................................................................................................... 4 Assessment Using NAS Chart MR 495 ................................................................................ 4 NAS Scoring Schedule .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (Nas) Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Revised: March 30, 2012 - Please note that this guideline is for information purposes only. These recommendations reflect the information available as of the date it was issued and therefore should be used in that context. Please use your own clinical judgment when applying any management strategies documented in this resource. NEONATAL ABSTINENCE SYNDROME (NAS) CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Levels of Evidence ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Glossary ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations Maternal Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 4 Algorithm for Antenatal Assessment of Risk of NAS ........................................... 13 Neonatal Recommendations Screening and Assessment ............................................................................................... 14 Algorithm for Assessment and Care of Infants at Risk of NAS ............................. 19 Modified Finnegan Scoring System ..................................................................... 20 Treatment ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Guideline
    Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) Management HNELHD CG 20_49 Clinical Guideline Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) Management Sites where Clinical Guideline applies All Maternity and Newborn Service sites in HNELHD This Clinical Guideline applies to: 1. Adults No 2. Children up to 16 years No 3. Neonates – less than 29 days Yes Target audience Clinicians in Neonatal units and Maternity sites, including postnatal care areas in HNELHD Description Provides information for neonatal clinicians regarding the care of the newborn baby at risk of neonatal abstinence syndrome and their family Go to Guideline Keywords Neonate, newborn, NICU, SCU, maternity, substance, NAS, withdrawal, abstinence, Finnegan’s, drug use Document registration number HNELHD CG 20_49 Replaces existing document? Yes Registration number and dates of Maternity and Newborn – Neonatal Abstinence superseded documents Syndrome (NAS) Management HNELHD CG 17_03 Related Legislation, Australian Standard, NSW Ministry of Health Policy Directive or Guideline, National Safety and Quality Health Service Standard (NSQHSS) and/or other, HNE Health Document, Professional Guideline, Code of Practice or Ethics: • NSW Health Guideline GL2013_008 Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Guidelines • NSW Health Guideline GL2014_022 Guidelines for the Management of Substance Use During Pregnancy Birth and the Postnatal Period • NSW Health Policy Directive PD2007_091 Nursing & Midwifery Management of Drug & Alcohol issues in the Delivery of Health Care Position responsible for Clinical Guideline Dr Paul
    [Show full text]
  • UIHC Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
    Identifying Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and Treatment Guidelines University of Iowa Children’s Hospital -11/2014 What is Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? • Neonatal withdrawal after intrauterine exposure to certain drugs (illicit or prescription) • Occurs with the abrupt cessation of the drug exposure at birth • Most commonly seen with opioid exposure, but also seen after exposure to sedatives, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), polysubstance abuse, and occasionally barbiturates and alcohol • Develops in 55-94% of opioid drug-exposed infants and 28-30% of SSRI-exposed infants Screening • Maternal history • Meconium drug testing • Urine drug screen • Umbilical cord testing Clinical Signs of Withdrawal Central Nervous System Metabolism/Vasomotor/Respiratory Gastrointestinal • Irritability • Diaphoresis • Vomiting • Increased wakefulness • Nasal stuffiness • Diarrhea • High-pitched cry • Fever • Dehydration • Tremor • Mottling • Poor weight gain • Increased muscle tone • Temperature instability • Poor feeding • Hyperactive deep • Piloerection • Uncoordinated and constant tendon reflexes • Mild elevations in respiratory sucking • Frequent yawning rate and blood pressure • Sneezing • Seizures Onset of withdrawal symptoms • Onset of withdrawal depends on the half-life of the drug, duration of the addiction, and time of last maternal dose prior to delivery. On average, observation period for symptoms to appear is 3 days. Drug Approximate time to onset of withdrawal symptoms Barbiturates 4-7 days but can range from 1-14 days
    [Show full text]