DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Annual Report for the Northern Tier Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NORTHERN TIER NETWORK NORTH DAKOTA FY16 North Dakota State University, University of North Dakota and North Dakota Information Technology Department /////////////////////////////////////////////////////INDEX FY16 ANNUAL REPORT 3 KEY ELEMENTS 4 LOOKING AHEAD–CRITICAL UPGRADES FOR NEXT GENERATION APPLICATIONS 4 OVERVIEW 5 FY16 FINANCIAL SUMMARY 9 21ST CENTURY COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND ACADEMICS 10 LOCAL AND GLOBAL IMPACT 14 MILESTONES 15 NTN-ND PARTNERS 18 REFERENCES 19 2 | NORTHERN TIER NETWORK FY16 ANNUAL REPORT The report will provide an update on the operations and maintenance of the Northern Tier Network – North Dakota (NTN-ND) for the fiscal year 2016 aligned to the intent of the network as described in the North Dakota Century Code. Contents of this report include a description of the functions of the network and its service to the research and education activities in North Dakota, along with its role in the larger regional, ///////////////////////////////////////////////////// national and global research and education (R&E) network community. This report is intended to inform NTN-ND stakeholders across North Dakota, especially those beneficiaries of the exemplary resources that connection to this global community provides. These include students, faculty and staff located at higher education institutions and Tribal Colleges, and the K-12 community. An overview of NTN-ND and its role within the larger regional, national and global R&E network environment is followed by a current financial report, examples of 21st century collaborative research and academics, highlights of major milestones in the evolution of the R&E network community, and NTN-ND partners. EVALUATION PROCEDURES Data gathered and analyzed for this document included a review of current financial records, annual operations, recent R&E network traffic summaries, and current trends in use cases of R&E networks. LIMITATIONS This report is intended to provide an overview of annual operations and maintenance, financial status and highlighted use cases that offer evidence of current and near-term trends salient to this topic. It does not provide detailed technical information on network operations and maintenance. The list of use cases highlights a short list of examples and is not considered to be exclusive of those experienced by institutions across North Dakota. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES Additional information on peer networks at the regional and national levels as well as primary partners and collaborators of NTN-ND are listed at the end of this document. “ The Northern Tier Network, part of a national research network, serves entities within and outside this state. The North Dakota University System may use the Northern Tier Network infrastructure only for the purpose of supporting the research and education missions of the North Dakota University System. N.D.C.C. § 15-10-45 This document is available in print format online at www.ndsu.edu/vpit/ntn 3 KEY ELEMENTS • NTN-ND continues to enjoy the engaged support of its three state-level partners: the Information Technology Department (ITD), North Dakota State University (NDSU) and the University of North Dakota (UND), all of whom are collectively responsible for oversight and visioning the future direction of this valuable resource. On behalf of this partnership, NDSU is the fiscal agent and supervises operations and maintenance activities. • This state connection to the national and global R&E network community depends upon North Dakota’s state government and education network (STAGEnet) to connect higher public education institutions and Tribal Colleges, and public K-12 schools. • NTN-ND is operated through contracts with private telecommunications companies and higher education services providers, mirroring a successful model prevalent in state and regional network partnerships across the United States. • NTN-ND continues to remain fiscally healthy since the time of its completion in 2009. Annual expenditures are designated for ongoing costs of operations and maintenance on equipment, fiber, services of a Network Operations Center, membership dues and network participation fees, and other miscellaneous operating expenses. No money is used to fund staff of NTN-ND partners ITD, UND or NDSU. • In 2016, North Dakota and its national counterpart, Internet2, celebrated 20 years as partners in the greater U.S. research and education collaborative environment. Since 1996, the Internet2 community has worked to develop and expand the networking capabilities that advance research and education on a global scale. Working together, this community solves common technology challenges and develops innovative solutions in support of their educational, research and community service missions. LOOKING AHEAD – CRITICAL UPGRADES FOR NEXT GENERATION APPLICATIONS • The NTN-ND’s collegial partnership with neighboring regional R&E networks includes visioning for current and future needs of academics and research. • Some of the closest neighboring states and regional networks who have completed or are in the process of completing network upgrades to 100G include the Great Plains Network (GPN), Merit Network/MI, BOREASnet/MN, Montana, Nebraska and South Dakota. • Partnering and staying in step with neighboring regional and global optical networks serving research and education allow students and faculty at all institutions to advance at the same level and ensures continued partnering on research and academics regardless of where institutions are located. 4 | NORTHERN TIER NETWORK OVERVIEW ABOUT NTN-ND The Northern Tier Network–North Dakota (NTN-ND) is a joint network effort between the State’s Information Technology Department, NDSU and UND to connect North Dakota to the nation’s research and education network. This high-speed backbone network depends upon STAGEnet for institutional connectivity and is operated through contracts with private telecommunications companies and higher education service providers. NTN–ND is the state-owned segment of the larger regional research and education (R&E) network called the Northern Tier Network Consortium, built collaboratively by states in the upper Great Plains and Pacific Northwest in an effort to provide high-speed network connectivity to research universities. ABOUT NTNC The Northern Tier Network Consortium (NTNC), consists of 12 member states between Michigan and Washington, and Alaska. As indicated in Figure 1, these state networks interoperate to form a larger whole, which serves to function as the governing body for the Northern Tier Network. As built, NTN–ND has a raw capacity of 10 circuits capable of 10 gigabits per second (10 billion bits per second) each. In comparison, advertised residential broadband is typically around 12-50 megabits per second (12-50 million bits per second), with the fastest available advertised speed being approximately 200 megabits per second (200 million bits per second). The high capacity of NTN–ND is used to facilitate collaborations in research, including access to shared computing resources, access and transfer of large data sets and use of high- performance networking applications for shared, real-time access to remote instruments across the country and around the world. This includes not only institutions of higher education, but also federal research labs such as Los Alamos National Lab and Pacific Northwest National Lab. Transport of this data takes place primarily over Internet2, the member-owned research and education network founded by the nation’s leading higher education institutions. NTN–ND enables North Dakota’s institutions of higher education to connect to this national resource. Alaska CANARIE/BCnet The Northern Tier Network Consortium Asia Grand Spokane Forks Seattle Coeur Missoula Bismarck d’Alene Fargo Houghton Marquette Pullman Dickinson Superior Sault Ste. Marie Miles City Wahpeton Moscow Yakima Ashland Billings Aberdeen Powers Bozeman Eau Portland Claire Marinette FIG.1 Minneapolis Green Bay Rapid City Sioux Falls Idaho Falls Lansing South- Pocatello Madison field Boise ORION Milwaukee American Falls Iowa Hillsdale Ames Ann Laramie City Stateline Arbor Omaha Chicago Lincoln OARnet NTNC Regional Optical Networks Salt Lake Fort Collins BOREAS NTN-ND City FRGP/BiSON PNWGP Boulder IRON SD-REED Denver Merit UNL Kansas Colorado Springs City MUREN Wiscnet Pueblo Internet2 National Backbone 2/19/2016 Figure 1: Full Northern Tier Network Consortium path (2015) 5 The NTNC seeks to develop and sustain advanced networking capabilities and shared cyber infrastructure facilities to support the educational, research and economic vitality of the Northern Tier region. Primary goals of the NTNC include: • providing a premier research network that connects the Northern Tier states from current endpoints in Chicago and Seattle to ensure that every Internet2 member in the Northern Tier has the ability to establish an appropriate high-speed connection to a national or international aggregation point; • maximizing network peering and interconnection opportunities between Northern Tier networks and other research networks and networking consortia; • providing a network which can serve as a foundation for regional economic development, as well as academic and research development; • leveraging intellectual, political and financial resources across the region to expand relationships with state and national leaders, attract greater federal interest, maximize opportunities for grant and contract support and create greater leverage with vendors; • enhancing
Recommended publications
  • QUILT CIRCLE2020 a Letter from the President

    QUILT CIRCLE2020 a Letter from the President

    THE QUILT CIRCLE2020 A Letter From the President This 2020 Quilt Circle edition commemorates the 20th Anniversary of The Quilt. The fabric of our research and education (R&E) networking community has never been stronger. While our Quilt community has evolved in new and exciting ways in the past two decades, we have also been faced with a number of challenges which we take head-on and always with the spirit of collaboration. As we address the unprecedented challenges presented by the current global public health crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the work of our members is more important than ever to the missions of their member communities. U.S. higher education institutions rely on R&E networks to give them a competitive edge in the most impactful scientific research initiatives which is essential in this crisis. We connect the educational institutions that support university medical centers and their associated hospitals. R&E networks also connect tens of thousands of other community anchor institutions, including K-12 schools, public libraries, local/state government, research sites, cultural institutions, public safety, and tribal lands. Being responsive and providing vital networking infrastructure and resources right now to address immediate needs is who we are and what we do. R&E networks are part of our nation’s critical infrastructure. This year’s edition of The Quilt Circle showcases several examples of the key role of R&E network members in both providing and facilitating the use-network infrastructure to further scientific discovery and collaborations at higher education institutions of all sizes.
  • Esnet: Advanced NETWORKING for SCIENCE

    Esnet: Advanced NETWORKING for SCIENCE

    ENERGY SCIENCES NETWORK ESnet: Advanced NETWORKING for SCIENCE Researchers around the world using advanced computing for scientific discovery are connected via the DOE-operated Energy Sciences Network (ESnet). By providing a reliable, high-performance communications infrastructure, ESnet facilitates the large-scale, collaborative science endeavors fundamental to Office of Science missions. Energy Sciences Network tive science. These include: sharing of massive In many ways, the dramatic achievements of 21st amounts of data, supporting thousands of collab- century scientific discovery—often involving orators worldwide, distributed data processing enormous data handling and remote collabora- and data management, distributed simulation, tion requirements—have been made possible by visualization, and computational steering, and accompanying accomplishments in high-per- collaboration with the U.S. and international formance networking. As increasingly advanced research and education (R&E) communities. supercomputers and experimental research facil- To ensure that ESnet continues to meet the ities have provided researchers with powerful requirements of the major science disciplines a tools with unprecedented capabilities, advance- new approach and a new architecture are being ments in networks connecting scientists to these developed. This new architecture includes ele- tools have made these research facilities available ments supporting multiple, high-speed national to broader communities and helped build greater backbones with different characteristics—redun- collaboration within these communities. The dancy, quality of service, and circuit oriented DOE Office of Science (SC) operates the Energy services—all the while allowing interoperation of Sciences Network (ESnet). Established in 1985, these elements with the other major national and ESnet currently connects tens of thousands of international networks supporting science.
  • On Multi-Point, In-Network Filtering of Distributed Denial-Of-Service Traffic

    On Multi-Point, In-Network Filtering of Distributed Denial-Of-Service Traffic

    On Multi-Point, In-Network Filtering of Distributed Denial-of-Service Traffic Mingwei Zhang∗, Lumin Shi∗, Devkishen Sisodia∗, Jun Li∗, Peter Reihery ∗ University of Oregon fmingwei, luminshi, dsisodia, [email protected] y University of California, Los Angeles [email protected] Abstract—Research has shown that distributed denial-of- in a common language. Further, it is also unknown how these service (DDoS) attacks on the Internet could often be better solutions perform under insufficient knowledge of the attacks handled by enlisting the in-network defense of multiple au- or against intelligent adversaries who can dynamically revise tonomous systems (ASes), rather than relying entirely on the victim’s Internet Service Provider at the edge. Less noticed their attack strategies to escape defense. Without a quantitative but important is the fact that an in-network defense can also comparison, it is hard for a DDoS victim to select the most remove DDoS traffic from the Internet early en route to the suitable solution to achieve its defense goal and meet the victim, thus decreasing the overall load on the Internet and resource requirements. reducing chances of link congestion. However, it is not well In this paper, we introduce a modeling and simulation understood to what degree different in-network defense strategies can achieve such benefits. In this paper, we model the existing framework to systematically evaluate in-network DDoS de- two main categories of in-network DDoS defense algorithms fense algorithms. The framework contains a general model (PushBack, SourceEnd) and propose a new type of algorithm that can describe the attack and defense for various defense (StrategicPoints).
  • Ipv6 in Esnet

    Ipv6 in Esnet

    SLAC-PUB-8902 IPv6 in ESnet Warren Matthews, Principal Network Specialist, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) Bob Fink, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Research Staff, Co-chair NGtrans WG, IETF and Project Lead for the 6bone Project, IETF. Susan Hicks, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Vyto Grigaliunas, Network Analyst, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) Abstract The importance of the Internet to modern High Energy Physics collaborators is clearly immense, and understanding how new developments in network technology impact net- works is critical to the future design of experiments. The next generation Internet Protocol (IPv6) is being deployed on testbeds and pro- duction networks throughout the world. The protocol has been designed to solve todays internet problems, and many of the features will be core Internet services in the future. In this talk the features of the protocol will be described. Details will be given on the deployment at sites important to High Energy Physics Research and the network services operating at these sites. In particular IPv6 deployment on the U.S. Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) will be reviewed. The connectivity and performance between High Energy Physics Laboratories, Universities and Institutes will be discussed. Keywords: Network, Technology, Internet, Protocol, IP, IPv6 1 Introduction High Energy and Nuclear Physics (HENP) experiments around the world generate huge amounts of data, much of which is transferred across networks to collaborators for analysis. Network technology has become critical to the success of experiments. The requirements of HENP researchers often means the networks they use become early implementors of new network technology. In this paper the next generation of the Internet Protocol (IP) is reviewed.
  • Growth of the Internet

    Growth of the Internet

    Growth of the Internet K. G. Coffman and A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Labs - Research [email protected], [email protected] Preliminary version, July 6, 2001 Abstract The Internet is the main cause of the recent explosion of activity in optical fiber telecommunica- tions. The high growth rates observed on the Internet, and the popular perception that growth rates were even higher, led to an upsurge in research, development, and investment in telecommunications. The telecom crash of 2000 occurred when investors realized that transmission capacity in place and under construction greatly exceeded actual traffic demand. This chapter discusses the growth of the Internet and compares it with that of other communication services. Internet traffic is growing, approximately doubling each year. There are reasonable arguments that it will continue to grow at this rate for the rest of this decade. If this happens, then in a few years, we may have a rough balance between supply and demand. Growth of the Internet K. G. Coffman and A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Labs - Research [email protected], [email protected] 1. Introduction Optical fiber communications was initially developed for the voice phone system. The feverish level of activity that we have experienced since the late 1990s, though, was caused primarily by the rapidly rising demand for Internet connectivity. The Internet has been growing at unprecedented rates. Moreover, because it is versatile and penetrates deeply into the economy, it is affecting all of society, and therefore has attracted inordinate amounts of public attention. The aim of this chapter is to summarize the current state of knowledge about the growth rates of the Internet, with special attention paid to the implications for fiber optic transmission.
  • 1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes Rfcs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M

    1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes Rfcs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M

    Network Working Group S. Romano Request for Comments: 1117 M. Stahl Obsoletes RFCs: 1062, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M. Recker 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, SRI-NIC 758, 755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 August 1989 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 INTERNET NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is an official status report on the network numbers and the autonomous system numbers used in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Introduction This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently assigned network numbers and gateway autonomous systems. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from Hostmaster at the DDN Network Information Center (NIC). Hostmaster DDN Network Information Center SRI International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, California 94025 Phone: 1-800-235-3155 Network mail: [email protected] Most of the protocols used in the Internet are documented in the RFC series of notes. Some of the items listed are undocumented. Further information on protocols can be found in the memo "Official Internet Protocols" [40]. The more prominent and more generally used are documented in the "DDN Protocol Handbook" [17] prepared by the NIC. Other collections of older or obsolete protocols are contained in the "Internet Protocol Transition Workbook" [18], or in the "ARPANET Protocol Transition Handbook" [19]. For further information on ordering the complete 1985 DDN Protocol Handbook, contact the Hostmaster. Also, the Internet Activities Board (IAB) publishes the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" [52], which describes the state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet.
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    2015 Annual Report ANNUAL 2015 REPORT CONTENTS i Letter from the President 4 ii NYSERNet Names New President 6 iii NYSERNet Members Institutions 8 iv Membership Update 9 v Data Center 10 vi VMWare Quilt Project 11 vii Working Groups 12 viii Education Services 13 ix iGlass 14 x Network 16 xi Internet Services 17 xii Board Members 18 xiii Our Staff 19 xiv Human Face of Research 20 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to present to you NYSERNet’s 2015 Annual Report. Through more than three decades, NYSERNet’s members have addressed the education and research community’s networking and other technology needs together, with trust in each other guiding us through every transition. This spring inaugurates more change, as City. The terrible attack of Sept. 11, 2001, we welcome a new president and I will step complicated achievement of that goal, made down from that position to focus on the it more essential, and taught a sobering research community’s work and needs. lesson concerning the importance of communication and the need to harden the By itself, working with NYSERNet’s infrastructure that supports it. We invested extraordinary Board and staff to support in a wounded New York City, deploying fiber and building what today has become a global exchange point at “ These two ventures formed pieces 32 Avenue of the Americas. In the process, we forged partnerships in a puzzle that, when assembled, that have proved deep and durable. benefited all of New York and beyond.” Despite inherent risks, and a perception that New York City the collective missions of our members institutions might principally benefit, for the past 18 years has been a privilege NYSERNet’s Board unanimously supported beyond my imagining.
  • Broadband for Education: the National Internet2 K20 Initiative’S and WICHE’S Recommendations to the FCC

    Broadband for Education: the National Internet2 K20 Initiative’S and WICHE’S Recommendations to the FCC

    Broadband for Education: The National Internet2 K20 Initiative’s and WICHE’s Recommendations to the FCC Who are we? Internet2: We bring together Internet2’s world-class network and research community members with innovators from colleges and universities, primary and secondary schools, libraries, museums and other educational institutions, the full spectrum of America’s education community, including both formal and informal education. The National K20 Initiative extends new technologies, applications, and rich educational content to all students, their families and communities – no matter where they’re located. We have had immense success connecting the institutions above – in fact, over 65,000 institutions are now connected to the National Internet2 network – but to realize fully the potential of Internet2 all institutions must have adequate bandwidth. What follows are principles we endorse and urge the FCC to adopt. We divide our recommendations into two interrelated categories: connectivity and e-rate support. Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE): WICHE and its 15 member states work to improve access to higher education and ensure student success. Our student exchange programs, regional initiatives, and our research and policy work allow us to assist constituents in the West and beyond. Equitable access to broadband technology and, in particular, technology-enabled education, is among our strategies. At present much of the West, particularly the “frontier West,” has little or no access to adequate bandwidth. Many of our institutions are not among those connected by and participating in the Internet2 K20 Initiative. The principles and recommendations below would remedy this situation. Our recommendations: (1) Connectivity • Elementary schools, secondary schools, and branch libraries should be connected at 100 Mbps to 10 Gbps.
  • Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M

    Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M

    Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M. Stahl Obsoletes RFCs: 1117, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M. Recker 943, 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, July 1990 758, 755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 INTERNET NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is a status report on the network numbers and autonomous system numbers used in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Table of Contents Introduction.................................................... 1 Network Numbers................................................. 4 Class A Networks................................................ 7 Class B Networks................................................ 8 Class C Networks................................................ 47 Other Reserved Internet Addresses............................... 100 Network Totals.................................................. 101 Autonomous System Numbers....................................... 102 Documents....................................................... 111 Contacts........................................................ 115 Security Considerations......................................... 182 Authors' Addresses.............................................. 182 Introduction This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently assigned network numbers and gateway autonomous systems. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from Hostmaster at the DDN Network Information
  • May 2013 Report APPENDIX D

    May 2013 Report APPENDIX D

    APPENDIX D 2013 ESINet Steering Committee Report to the 130th General Assembly Technical Standards Subcommittee INFRASTRUCTURE EVALUATION An examination of the readiness of the state’s current technology infrastructure to support a statewide emergency services internet protocol network for Next Generation 9-1-1 Services. 0 | P a g e Table of Contents PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 EXISTING TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 2 OHIO OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................ 3 OIT Telecommunications .............................................................................................................................. 3 Procurement ................................................................................................................................................. 3 DAS Network Contract Management Services ............................................................................................. 4 Contracts by Service ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Reach…. ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Capacity
  • The Quilt a Collaboration of U.S. Research and Education Networks

    The Quilt a Collaboration of U.S. Research and Education Networks

    The Quilt A Collaboration of U.S. Research and Education Networks Slide 1 April 15, 2014 The Quilt The Quilt is a non-profit collaboration of our country’s advanced regional research and education networks. Created in 2000, The Quilt is a member- powered, vibrant forum where leaders from these networks come together to exchange knowledge, experience and ideas to collectively advance networking for research & education. The Quilt aims to influence the national agenda on information technology infrastructure, with particular emphasis on networking for research and education. Through this coalition, Quilt members collaborate to promote the delivery of networking services at lower cost, higher performance and greater reliability and security. Quilt members are our country’s not-for-profit networking organizations serving research and education with similar missions to; support research and education, collaborate, manage advanced networks, provide advanced networking services and further knowledge and innovation. Slide 2 April 15, 2014 Introductions • The U.S. non-profit research and education networks are funded, governed and structured differently. These aspects of the organizations reflect the diverse and complex environments of the communities and states in which they operate. • While diverse in some aspects, these organizations are similarly missioned with common goals which are to provide an advanced network infrastructure, services and applications which support of the research and education goals of the institutions each serve. Slide
  • Remarks on the Anniversary of the Merit Computer Network

    Remarks on the Anniversary of the Merit Computer Network

    Remarks on the Anniversary of the Merit Computer Network James J. Duderstadt President Emeritus and University Professor of Science and Engineering Ann Arbor November 16, 2006 2 Introduction Happy 40th Anniversary!!! • It is an honor to be able to participate in this celebration and well-deserved recognition of the extraordinary impact Merit has had on our state, the nation, and, indeed, the world. • • It is also great to see so many of those responsible for its achievements present…and still ticking! • • Actually, I arrived at Michigan about the same time that Merit was launched, and my career has been not only heavily influenced by at times interwoven with Merit’s. • • Hence, I thought it might be appropriate to take a quick nostalgia trip through these years, commenting on various aspects of Merit’s history from a personal perspective as a user, occasional defender, and strong admirer of the Merit Network. • • Before dredging up what my failing memory has to offer, let me stay in the present mode for just a moment to mention an experience I had just last week. Salzburg Seminar • Just arrived back from Salzburg, where I led a week long session of 45 higher education leaders from 25 nations and all five continents on a discussion of the changing needs and nature of higher education in the face of o rapidly changing demographics o globalization o and the knowledge economy • Whether in developed nations in Europe, Asia, or North America or in developing nations elsewhere, there is a growing recognition of two imperatives o “massification” of teriary education o lifelong learning 3 • And everywhere there is also a recognition that the scaffolding for this effort will be provided by cyberinfrastructure–or as the rest of the world calls it, ICT–information and communications technology.