Dorset Macro-Moths 2013 County Macro-Moth Recorder's Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lockerbie Wildlife Trust Eskrigg Reserve July 2016 News Bulletin
Lockerbie Wildlife Trust (www.lockerbie-wildlife-trust.co.uk) Eskrigg Reserve Scottish Charity No: July 2016 News Bulletin SC 005538 1. View of the pond from the Red Squirrel Hide on the 2nd of July and view of Eskrigg Centre and the Compost Toilet on the 6th of July. JR JR 2. Confirmed wildlife sightings at the Reserve in July. a. Birds CB Blackbird, Black East Indian Duck, Blue Tit, Bullfinch, Buzzard, Carrion Crow, Chaffinch, Chiffchaff, Coal Tit, Dunnock, Goldfinch, Great Spotted Woodpecker, Great Tit, Greenfinch, Grey Heron, Grey Wagtail, House Martin, House Sparrow, Jackdaw, Jay, Kestrel, Kingfisher, Little Grebe, Long-tailed Tit, Mallard, Moorhen, Mute Swan, Nuthatch, Pheasant, Raven, Robin, Siskin, Song Thrush, Sparrowhawk, Starling, Swallow, Swift, Treecreeper, Willow Warbler, Wood Pigeon, Wren. Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) b. Mammals Bank Vole, Common Shrew, Fox, Mole, Rabbit, Red Squirrel, Roe Deer, Woodmouse. c. Reptiles and Amphibians Common Lizard, Frog, Newt, Toad. d. Invertebrates Black Slug; Buff-tailed, Tree and White-tailed Bumble Bees; JR Common Carder Bee; Green-veined White, Large Skipper, Large White, Meadow Brown, Ringlet and Small Tortoiseshell Butterflies; Crane-flies; Azure, Blue-tailed and Common Blue Damselflies; Common Darter and Four- spotted Chaser Dragonflies; Froghoppers, Grasshoppers; Dark Great Horse-fly; Foxglove Pug, Hoverflies; Eyed and 7-Spot Ladybird; Midges; Mosquitoes; Beautiful China- mark, Clouded Border, Common White Wave, July Foxglove Pug (Eupithecia plumbeolata) Highflyer, LargeYellow Underwing, -
Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002
Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002 A Report on the Micro-Moths, Butterflies and Macro-Moths of VC58 S.H. Hind, S. McWilliam, B.T. Shaw, S. Farrell and A. Wander Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society November 2003 1 1. Introduction Welcome to the 2002 report on lepidoptera in VC58 (Cheshire). This is the second report to appear in 2003 and follows on from the release of the 2001 version earlier this year. Hopefully we are now on course to return to an annual report, with the 2003 report planned for the middle of next year. Plans for the ‘Atlas of Lepidoptera in VC58’ continue apace. We had hoped to produce a further update to the Atlas but this report is already quite a large document. We will, therefore produce a supplementary report on the Pug Moths recorded in VC58 sometime in early 2004, hopefully in time to be sent out with the next newsletter. As usual, we have produced a combined report covering micro-moths, macro- moths and butterflies, rather than separate reports on all three groups. Doubtless observers will turn first to the group they are most interested in, but please take the time to read the other sections. Hopefully you will find something of interest. Many thanks to all recorders who have already submitted records for 2002. Without your efforts this report would not be possible. Please keep the records coming! This request also most definitely applies to recorders who have not sent in records for 2002 or even earlier. It is never too late to send in historic records as they will all be included within the above-mentioned Atlas when this is produced. -
BRINSLEY HEADSTOCKS Heritage & Nature Reserve. BUTTERFLIES
BRINSLEY HEADSTOCKS Heritage & Nature Reserve. BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS 2016 BUTTERFLIES The mix of unimproved meadow, woodland and hedgerows provide an ideal habitat for a number of butterfly species. The total number of species recorded to date is 21, a very respectable total for a site the size of the Headstocks Nature Reserve. The number of species recorded in 2016 was 14 ( down from 18 in 2015 ). Recording was very difficult in 2016, as major path improvements on site from May until July made access difficult due to the heavy machinery used. The cold, wet spring also had an impact on early-flying species and once again the early cutting of the hay in the meadows curtailed the breeding success of the grassland butterflies. SMALL SKIPPER Thymelicus sylvestris The only record for the year was of two insects of this species seen on July 24th 2016. This species is normally recorded regularly in its flight period, with a maximum of eight recorded in 2015. ESSEX SKIPPER Thymelicus lineola Not recorded in 2016. The first site record for this species was of a single on August 12th 2015. There had been a few sightings of “possibles” in the preceding days, but the identity was confirmed by netting and close examination in an inspection jar. LARGE SKIPPER Ochlodes venatus A sin the last two years, there was only a single record of this species in 2016, when one was seen on July 5th. Normally present in both the long meadow and the headstocks meadow, although not as numerous as small skipper. BRIMSTONE Gonepteryx rhamni There were two records of this species in 2016, both in April and May ( as in 2015 ). -
LENS Wildlife Watch
LENS LENS Long Eaton Natural Wildlife History Society Watch Autumn 2016 Volume 2 Issue 18 IT’S A DISGRACE! Forbes Hole LNR Inside this issue: LES Eco Day 2 Sustrans Bioblitz BNA Our Garden/Barkers 3 Pond Fay Blackburn Cherry Tree Walk 4 Forbes Hole LNR 6 Shardlow 7 Willington 8 Attenborough 9 Hilton 11 Bradgate 12 Bennerley 14 Trent Lock 16+22 Toton 17 Millersdale 19 Straws Bridge 21 Elvaston 23 Stoney Clouds 27 i-record, invasive 29 species, i-spot The picture says it all. Concerns have been raised with Erewash Borough Council as the site at Forbes Hole Local Nature Reserve is now open to Future events 30 Contact details abuse by all elements of motor vehicle. It is hoped finance can be raised to replace the gate and fencing whilst allowing disabled access. LENS AT Rotary Club Children’s Fun Day Canal side flowers featured in LENS quiz at the Rotary Interact Club Wildlife Children‟s Fun Day. It was a scorcher! The Long Eaton Rotary Interact emergency call group is made up of 11-18 year olds. They ran a Free Family Fun Day police for local families last year, the event was so successful that they 08456 058058 decided to run the event again. The concept is that families in the summer holidays find it difficult to find activities for the whole family E-mail to take part in and when they do, they can be expensive. So they organised a free family fun day, where families can come bring a force.control@derby picnic and have a go at an activity or take part in one of the shire.pnn.police.uk various workshops free of charge. -
Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe. -
Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind [email protected] for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). -
Download This PDF File
REDIA, XCVIII, 2015: 77-92 MEHDI ESFANDIARI (*) - MOHAMMAD MAHDI RABIEH (**) - ALEXEJ MATOV (***) MOHAMMAD SAEED MOSSADEGH (*) A SURVEY OF EREBIDAE, NOLIDAE AND EUTELIIDAE (LEPIDOPTERA) IN SOUTHERN AND NORTHEASTERN OF IRAN (*) Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. (**) Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran. (***) Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ZISP), Universitetskaya nab., 1; 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia. Corresponding author: Mehdi Esfandiari, e-mail [email protected] Esfandiari M., Rabieh M.M., Matov A., Mossadegh M.S. – A survey of Erebidae, Nolidae and Euteliidae (Lepidoptera) in Southern and Northeastern of Iran. Noctuoidea are the largest superfamily of Lepidoptera which have not yet fully investigated in Iran. In order to inventories such important group, faunistic studies on the families Erebidae, Nolidae and Euteliidae were made by light traps mainly in the three Iranian provinces of Fars, Khuzestan and Khorasan-e-Razavi during 2009-2011. Totally, 42 taxa belonging to 26 genera and 7 subfamilies were collected. Among these, one species – Drasteria kusnezovi (John, 1910) – is newly reported for the Iranian fauna, together with 23 new provincial records. For all species, illustrations of adults and their genitalia are given with remarks. KEY WORDS: fauna, Noctuoidea, new record, Drasteria, distribution. INTRODUCTION using light traps powered by 12 volt batteries and 8 watt Black light UVB tubes. Genitalia of the specimens were While specific geographical situation of Iran promises a dissected, stained and mounted according to FIBIGER (1997) rich entomofauna, inventorying the large insect order with some modifications. The specimens and slides of their Lepidoptera has a great importance. -
Scottish Macro-Moth List, 2015
Notes on the Scottish Macro-moth List, 2015 This list aims to include every species of macro-moth reliably recorded in Scotland, with an assessment of its Scottish status, as guidance for observers contributing to the National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS). It updates and amends the previous lists of 2009, 2011, 2012 & 2014. The requirement for inclusion on this checklist is a minimum of one record that is beyond reasonable doubt. Plausible but unproven species are relegated to an appendix, awaiting confirmation or further records. Unlikely species and known errors are omitted altogether, even if published records exist. Note that inclusion in the Scottish Invertebrate Records Index (SIRI) does not imply credibility. At one time or another, virtually every macro-moth on the British list has been reported from Scotland. Many of these claims are almost certainly misidentifications or other errors, including name confusion. However, because the County Moth Recorder (CMR) has the final say, dubious Scottish records for some unlikely species appear in the NMRS dataset. A modern complication involves the unwitting transportation of moths inside the traps of visiting lepidopterists. Then on the first night of their stay they record a species never seen before or afterwards by the local observers. Various such instances are known or suspected, including three for my own vice-county of Banffshire. Surprising species found in visitors’ traps the first time they are used here should always be regarded with caution. Clerical slips – the wrong scientific name scribbled in a notebook – have long caused confusion. An even greater modern problem involves errors when computerising the data. -
Hampshire & Isle of Wight Butterfly & Moth Report 2012
Butterfly Conservation HAMPSHIRE & ISLE OF WIGHT BUTTERFLY & MOTH REPORT 2012 B Hampshire & Isle of Wight Butterfly & Moth Report, 2012 Editorial team: Paul Brock, Tim Norriss and Mike Wall Production Editors: Mike Wall (with the invaluable assistance of Dave Green) Co-writers: Andy Barker, Linda Barker, Tim Bernhard, Rupert Broadway, Andrew Brookes, Paul Brock, Phil Budd, Andy Butler, Jayne Chapman, Susan Clarke, Pete Durnell, Peter Eeles, Mike Gibbons, Brian Fletcher, Richard Levett, Jenny Mallett, Tim Norriss, Dave Owen, John Ruppersbery, Jon Stokes, Jane Vaughan, Mike Wall, Ashley Whitlock, Bob Whitmarsh, Clive Wood. Database: Ken Bailey, David Green, Tim Norriss, Ian Thirlwell, Mike Wall Webmaster: Robin Turner Butterfly Recorder: Paul Brock Moth Recorders: Hampshire: Tim Norriss (macro-moths and Branch Moth Officer), Mike Wall (micro-moths); Isle of Wight: Sam Knill-Jones Transect Organisers: Andy Barker, Linda Barker and Pam Welch Flight period and transect graphs: Andy Barker Photographs: Colin Baker, Mike Baker, Andy & Melissa Banthorpe, Andy Butler, Tim Bernhard, John Bogle, Paul Brock, Andy Butler, Jayne Chapman, Andy Collins, Sue Davies, Peter Eeles, Glynne Evans, Brian Fletcher, David Green, Mervyn Grist, James Halsey, Ray and Sue Hiley, Stephen Miles, Nick Montegriffo, Tim Norriss, Gary Palmer, Chris Pines, Maurice Pugh, John Ruppersbery, John Vigay, Mike Wall, Fred Woodworth, Russell Wynn Cover Photographs: Paul Brock (Eyed Hawk-moth larva) and John Bogle (Silver- studded Blue) Published by the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Branch of Butterfly Conservation, 2013 Butterfly Conservation is a charity registered in England & Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268). Registered Office: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP The opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of Butterfly Conservation. -
Latin Derivatives Dictionary
Dedication: 3/15/05 I dedicate this collection to my friends Orville and Evelyn Brynelson and my parents George and Marion Greenwald. I especially thank James Steckel, Barbara Zbikowski, Gustavo Betancourt, and Joshua Ellis, colleagues and computer experts extraordinaire, for their invaluable assistance. Kathy Hart, MUHS librarian, was most helpful in suggesting sources. I further thank Gaylan DuBose, Ed Long, Hugh Himwich, Susan Schearer, Gardy Warren, and Kaye Warren for their encouragement and advice. My former students and now Classics professors Daniel Curley and Anthony Hollingsworth also deserve mention for their advice, assistance, and friendship. My student Michael Kocorowski encouraged and provoked me into beginning this dictionary. Certamen players Michael Fleisch, James Ruel, Jeff Tudor, and Ryan Thom were inspirations. Sue Smith provided advice. James Radtke, James Beaudoin, Richard Hallberg, Sylvester Kreilein, and James Wilkinson assisted with words from modern foreign languages. Without the advice of these and many others this dictionary could not have been compiled. Lastly I thank all my colleagues and students at Marquette University High School who have made my teaching career a joy. Basic sources: American College Dictionary (ACD) American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (AHD) Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology (ODEE) Oxford English Dictionary (OCD) Webster’s International Dictionary (eds. 2, 3) (W2, W3) Liddell and Scott (LS) Lewis and Short (LS) Oxford Latin Dictionary (OLD) Schaffer: Greek Derivative Dictionary, Latin Derivative Dictionary In addition many other sources were consulted; numerous etymology texts and readers were helpful. Zeno’s Word Frequency guide assisted in determining the relative importance of words. However, all judgments (and errors) are finally mine. -
DNA Barcoding the Geometrid Fauna of Bavaria (Lepidoptera): Successes, Surprises, and Questions
DNA Barcoding the Geometrid Fauna of Bavaria (Lepidoptera): Successes, Surprises, and Questions Axel Hausmann1*, Gerhard Haszprunar1, Paul D. N. Hebert2 1 Entomology Department, Zoological Collection of the State of Bavaria, Munich, Germany, 2 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada Abstract Background: The State of Bavaria is involved in a research program that will lead to the construction of a DNA barcode library for all animal species within its territorial boundaries. The present study provides a comprehensive DNA barcode library for the Geometridae, one of the most diverse of insect families. Methodology/Principal Findings: This study reports DNA barcodes for 400 Bavarian geometrid species, 98 per cent of the known fauna, and approximately one per cent of all Bavarian animal species. Although 98.5% of these species possess diagnostic barcode sequences in Bavaria, records from neighbouring countries suggest that species-level resolution may be compromised in up to 3.5% of cases. All taxa which apparently share barcodes are discussed in detail. One case of modest divergence (1.4%) revealed a species overlooked by the current taxonomic system: Eupithecia goossensiata Mabille, 1869 stat.n. is raised from synonymy with Eupithecia absinthiata (Clerck, 1759) to species rank. Deep intraspecific sequence divergences (.2%) were detected in 20 traditionally recognized species. Conclusions/Significance: The study emphasizes the effectiveness of DNA barcoding as a tool for monitoring biodiversity. Open access is provided to a data set that includes records for 1,395 geometrid specimens (331 species) from Bavaria, with 69 additional species from neighbouring regions. Taxa with deep intraspecific sequence divergences are undergoing more detailed analysis to ascertain if they represent cases of cryptic diversity. -
Ecological Method Statement 22-01-2018
Brindle & Green Ecological Consultants Ltd ECOLOGISTS FOR BUSINESS www.brindlegreen.co.uk TEL: 0800 222 9105 Planning Services Peak District National Park Authority c/o Mr K Clayton Acumen Designers and Architects Ltd Headrow House Old Leeds Road Huddersfield HD1 1SG 10th January 2018 FAO: Mr John Scott RE: BG17.320 (Adaption of stables to form holiday accommodation NP/HPK/1015/0926, Park Hall Manor, Little Hayfield, Glossop, SK22 2NN) – Ecological Method Statement Dear John, I write to provide you with an ecological method statement pertaining to bats following emergence surveys undertaken at Park Hall Manor, Little Hayfield in order to discharge condition 6, associated with planning application NP/HPK/1015/0926, which stated: “No development shall take place until full details of an Ecological Method Statement have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. These details shall include: • Details of a working method statement to show how the proposed works will be undertaken in a manner that minimises the potential disturbance to bats and safeguards the value of the roost. • Details of bat friendly lighting, demonstrating avoidance of light spill onto roosts and provision of dark corridors for commuting bats. • Details of wildlife friendly planting and other ecological enhancements as deemed appropriate.” Summary Brindle & Green were commissioned by Leon Van Tonder to undertake bat emergence/re-entry surveys on a single storey stable block known as ‘The Stables’ at Park Hall Manor, Little Hayfield, prior to the buildings conversion into a residential dwelling. The bat surveys were undertaken during July, August and September 2015. The purpose of the bat surveys was to determine whether bats were using ‘The Stables’ building as a roosting site and to assess the level and type of bat activity on site.