Old Oil Rigs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Old Oil Rigs OLD OIL RIGS NEVER DIE Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-pdf/141/11/36/6452524/me-2019-nov2.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 From reinstallations to artificial reefing, obsolete oil platforms gush out new ideas for reuse. BY LINA ZELDOVICH iles away from the shore in the open ocean BCG has identified several other emerging decommis- stands an oil platform towering above the sioning hotspots around the world. Southeast Asia is the M water like a skyscraper. There is little oil left largest of them, with more than 1,500 structures and in the well beneath it, and the platform is nearing the end 7,000 wells. Over the next 20 years, however, the Persian of its working lifespan. Although it remains firmly moored Gulf is likely to have more shutdowns, since it has 1,000 to the ocean floor, something is about to happen. structures and 3,000 wells that will be more than 30 years A small, submarine-like vehicle descends along the old by 2038. tower that anchors the top deck to the seabed, a dia- In the Gulf of Mexico, where the United States Bureau of mond saw clipped onto its sturdy metal leg. After some Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) oversees radio exchanges, the saw comes to life and it begins to decommissioning, operators and contractors have been eat steadily through the metal. The small fish, disturbed removing about 150 to 250 structures a year since the by the unusual activity, scatter. The platform takedown 1980s. This makes the Gulf—where offshore production begins. began—the region most experienced with decommis- Offshore oil and gas platforms are among the largest sioning. structures humanity has ever built. There are more than Yet more challenges lie ahead. The shallow waters 7,500 of them towering up from seas all over the world, of the Gulf’s continental shelf have been thoroughly ex- according to some recent estimates. As wells dry up and ploited since 1937, when the predecessors of Chevron pumping equipment wears down, those structures are and ExxonMobil teamed up to build the first true offshore likely to become obsolete in the upcoming decades. platform, a modest pumping facility in 14 feet of water lo- But producers cannot just walk away from their cre- cated one mile off the coast of Louisiana. Within 10 years, ations. Those oil wells will have be decommissioned and production had moved 20 miles from the shore, though capped off and the platforms taken down. It will be a vast water depth was still only 18 feet. effort. In Europe’s North Sea, where production has de- BCG estimates that operators will have to remove more clined to 1.5 million barrels per day from 6 million barrels than 2,000 structures. They tend to be further offshore per day in its prime, decommissioning could cost produc- and an order of magnitude heavier than previous than ers $150 billion, according to a recent report by Boston previously decommissioned platforms—think 12,000-ton Consulting Group (BCG). structures in waters more than 330 feet deep. 1119_MEM_Deconstructing Offshore Platforms.indd 36 10/9/19 8:59 AM NOVEMBER 2019 | P.37 Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-pdf/141/11/36/6452524/me-2019-nov2.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Massive Brent Bravo oil platform makes dramatic arrival into Hartlepool's Seaton Port to be recycled. Photo: Shell 1119_MEM_Deconstructing Offshore Platforms.indd 37 10/9/19 8:59 AM Bluegrass engineers designed a 15’ underwater diamond wire saw. The saw was built in their machine shop and customized specifically for the challenges of dismanteling oil rigs. Photo: Bluegrass Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-pdf/141/11/36/6452524/me-2019-nov2.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 The North Sea is gearing up for an even steeper challenge. It legs and cross-bars to hold it steady, whose foundations are has about 600 platforms and more than 7,000 wells to decom- driven into the seabed. Deck-tower structures account for the mission. Some of those structures are an order of magnitude vast majority of aging platforms. larger than those slated for decommissioning on Gulf of Unlike floating platforms, which can be towed anywhere Mexico, and they sit in deeper water as well. once their moorings are loosened, deck-tower systems are For example, certain structures in Shell’s Brent field, located permanent structures. Each platform is essentially unique, and in the East Shetland Basin of the North Sea, weigh 330,000 cutting and disassembling them is as much an art as it is a sci- tons—the equivalent of the Empire State Building, according ence. The job often requires remarkable feats of engineering, to Duncan Manning, decommissioning manager for Royal combining new types of saws with deep-diving subsea robots. Dutch Shell’s Brent field. A typical takedown begins with dismantling the top But taking down an offshore oil platform and the tower that platform, which usually hosts production equipment, living supports it is no simple assignment. It is a massive engineering quarters, and a helicopter pad for bringing in crew and sup- project that requires state-of-the-art equipment. plies, said Chris Mattingly, a project manager at Bluegrass, a company that specializes in “nonexplosive demolition.” This A SCIENCE AND AN ART usually means cutting concrete and metal structures with Oil platforms come in many types and sizes. Those designed diamond-studded saws. for the deepest waters float on the surface, stabilized by ballast “It starts out with a crew of welders and they take down as and held in place by tension cables anchored to the sea floor. much of the top side as they can,” Mattingly said. “Then we More common, however, are structures designed for shal- get involved with our diamond wire saws, cutting steel mem- low waters near shore. These consist of a deck resting on top bers and piping, to get the top sides off—which is everything of a so-called jacket, a metal tower typically comprising four you see above water.” 1119_MEM_Deconstructing Offshore Platforms.indd 38 10/9/19 8:59 AM MECHANICAL ENGINEERING | NOVEMBER 2019 | P.39 Sometimes the weather is nice. A Stinger ROV is reflected in calm seas during underwater inspection of a fixed oil installation in the North Sea. Photo: Stinger Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-pdf/141/11/36/6452524/me-2019-nov2.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 The retired Williams platform, located 60 miles off the coast of Alabama, was recently disassembled into two massive pieces. The 3,600-ton topsides was lifted and placed on a transportation barge to be sent to shore for scrapping, while the 1200-ton steel frame supporting the deck, 300 feet under water, will become an artificial reef. Photo: Pipe Up, The Williams Blog Bluegrass is best known for pioneering the diamond saws it structures can be reused in another oil field. Companies uses, and it invented the first practical underwater diamond from Vietnam, Thailand, or China sometimes buy the old saw. Expectedly, these instruments do not look anything like structures and re-install them over their own oil wells, garage saws or chain saws. Mattingly said. Instead, they resemble calipers outfit with pulleys. The cut- In that case, the team preserves the entire tower structure. ting edge consist of long wires studded with diamond beads The four legs, usually 4-inch diameter each, are cut at the very and pulled around the pulleys by a hydraulic motor. The beads bottom and the jacket is lifted onto a barge in its entirety. steadily rub against the material, applying the force of friction “Imagine if you had a tree house in your backyard and you to the surface to efficiently cut any material, from reinforced sold it to your neighbor,” Mattingly explained. “You would just concrete to titanium. cut the posts at the bottom where the grass is, and he would The placement of the saw depends on the depth of the just pick up the whole tree house, take it into his yard and set water. In shallow waters, a human diver mounts the saw on it back up.” the metal or concrete struts with a hydraulic clamp to keep Other times, it makes sense to scrap the jacket entirely. In it in place. Then an operator controls the cut by regulating that case, Bluegrass or a similar contractor will cut the tower hydraulic power from a workboat. into smaller pieces, usually 10 to 20 foot sections that are then “In the Gulf of Mexico, often the water is shallow enough loaded onto barges and shipped to shore for recycling. that you can use a diver,” Mattingly said. “Anything deeper The exact depth at which they cut the legs depends on how than 300 feet requires a remotely operated vehicle, or ROV, the ocean area will be used once the structure is gone. Clearly, essentially a small submarine.” the presence of oil and gas platforms restricts boat traffic and Exactly how and where the jacket is cut depends on what commercial fishing because of the risk of collision and pipe- will be done with it. In some cases, these robust long-lasting line damage. 1119_MEM_Deconstructing Offshore Platforms.indd 39 10/9/19 8:59 AM With the platforms gone, however, planners can reopen that ocean area, but its intended use will determine the final stage of decommissioning. If they plan to use the area for fishing— and in the Gulf, that often means shrimping—the platform legs must be cut below the ocean sediment level, or “mud level.” Otherwise, metal scraps poking through the ocean bottom would catch and destroy shrimper nets, which scrape the bot- Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-pdf/141/11/36/6452524/me-2019-nov2.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 tom of the sea.
Recommended publications
  • Greenpeace Deep Sea Oil Briefing
    May 2012 Out of our depth: Deep-sea oil exploration in New Zealand greenpeace.org.nz Contents A sea change in Government strategy ......... 4 Safety concerns .............................................. 5 The risks of deep-sea oil ............................... 6 International oil companies in the dock ..... 10 Where is deep-sea oil exploration taking place in New Zealand? ..................... 12 Cover: A view from an altitude of 3200 ft of the oil on the sea surface, originated by the leaking of the Deepwater Horizon wellhead disaster. The BP leased oil platform exploded April 20 and sank after burning, leaking an estimate of more than 200,000 gallons of crude oil per day from the broken pipeline into the sea. © Daniel Beltrá / Greenpeace Right: A penguin lies in oil spilt from the wreck of the Rena © GEMZ Photography 2 l Greenpeace Deep-Sea Oil Briefing l May 2012 The inability of the authorities to cope with the effects of the recent oil spill from the Rena cargo ship, despite the best efforts of Maritime New Zealand, has brought into sharp focus the environmental risks involved in the Government’s decision to open up vast swathes of the country’s coastal waters for deep-sea oil drilling. The Rena accident highlighted the devastation that can be caused by what in global terms is actually still a relatively small oil spill at 350 tonnes and shows the difficulties of mounting a clean-up operation even when the source of the leaking oil is so close to shore. It raised the spectre of the environmental catastrophe that could occur if an accident on the scale of the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico were to occur in New Zealand’s remote waters.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download First Term at Tall Towers Kindle
    FIRST TERM AT TALL TOWERS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Lou Kuenzler | 192 pages | 03 Apr 2014 | Scholastic | 9781407136288 | English | London, United Kingdom First Term at Tall Towers, Kids Online Book Vlogger & Reviews - The KRiB - The KRiB TV Retrieved 5 October Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. Archived from the original on 20 August Retrieved 30 August Retrieved 26 July Cable News Network. Archived from the original on 1 March Retrieved 1 March The Daily Telegraph. Tobu Railway Co. Retrieved 8 March Skyscraper Center. Retrieved 15 October Retrieved Retrieved 27 March Retrieved 4 April Retrieved 27 December Palawan News. Retrieved 11 April Retrieved 25 October Tallest buildings and structures. History Skyscraper Storey. British Empire and Commonwealth European Union. Commonwealth of Nations. Additionally guyed tower Air traffic obstacle All buildings and structures Antenna height considerations Architectural engineering Construction Early skyscrapers Height restriction laws Groundscraper Oil platform Partially guyed tower Tower block. Italics indicate structures under construction. Petronius m Baldpate Platform Tallest structures Tallest buildings and structures Tallest freestanding structures. Categories : Towers Lists of tallest structures Construction records. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. Wikimedia Commons. Tallest tower in the world , second-tallest freestanding structure in the world after the Burj Khalifa. Tallest freestanding structure in the world —, tallest in the western hemisphere. Tallest in South East Asia. Tianjin Radio and Television Tower. Central Radio and TV Tower. Liberation Tower. Riga Radio and TV Tower. Berliner Fernsehturm. Sri Lanka. Stratosphere Tower. United States. Tallest observation tower in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release
    OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE January 2020 Author: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (www.boem.gov/newsroom/library/alaska-scientific-and-technical-publications, and click on 2020). CITATION BOEM, 2020. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release. OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 Anchorage, AK: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Alaska OCS Region. 151 pp. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release BOEM Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is a VLOS? ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 What Could Precipitate a VLOS? ................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Historical OCS and Worldwide
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Decommissioning and Valorisation of Oil&Gas Rigs In
    Exploring Decommissioning and Valorisation of Oil&Gas rigs in Sustainable and Circular Economy Frameworks Renata Archetti Valerio Cozzani Stefano Valentini Giacomo Segurini M.Gabriella Gaeta Stefano Valentini DICAM DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CIVILE, CHIMICA, AMBIENTALE E DEI MATERIALI e-DevSus Exploring Decommissioning and Valorisation of Oil&Gas rigs in Sustainable and Circular Economy Frameworks ALMA MATER STUDIORUM · UNIVERSITA’ DI BOLOGNA DICAM DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CIVILE, CHIMICA, AMBIENTALE E DEI MATERIALI ALMA MATER STUDIORUM – UNIVERSITA’ DI BOLOGNA DICAM – Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering Viale Risorgimento 2, I-40136 Bologna, Italy Authors: University of Bologna: Renata Archetti, Valerio Cozzani, Giacomo Segurini, M.Gabriella Gaeta ART-ER S.Cons.p.a: Stefano Valentini (Research and Innovation Division) ALMA MATER STUDIORUM · UNIVERSITA’ DI BOLOGNA DICAM DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CIVILE, CHIMICA, AMBIENTALE E DEI MATERIALI Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Offshore Platform Composition ............................................................................................ 6 1.2 Decommissioning process ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ravenspurn North Concrete Gravity Substructure
    THE ARUP JOURNAL AUTUMN 1989 Vol.24 No.3 Autumn 1989 Contents Published by Ove Arup Partnership THEARUP 13 Fitzroy Street, London W1P 680 Editor: David Brown Art Editor: Desmond Wyeth FCSD JOURNAL Deputy Editor : Caroline Lucas Ravenspurn North concrete 2 gravity substructure, by John Roberts Rank Xerox, 12 Welwyn Garden City, by Ian Gardner and Roger Johns Les Tours de la Liberte, 17 by Bernard Vaudeville and Brian Forster Matters of concern, 20 by Jack Zunz Front cover: Ravenspurn oil platform (Photo: John Salter) Back cover: View through pod windows at Rank Xerox, Welwyn Garden City (Photo: Jo Reid & John Peck) Ravenspurn North concrete gravity substructure John Roberts Significance Two concrete gravity substructures (CGSs) 1. Impression supporting production decks have been of Ravenspurn installed in the North Sea this summer. North central processing In June the Gullfaks 'C' platform was in­ platform after stalled in the Norwegian sector. At towout the installation of structure weighed 850 OOO tonnes - both decks. reputedly the largest object ever moved by man. At the beginning of August the Ravenspurn North concrete gravity sub­ structure, weighing some 28 OOO tonnes, was installed 80km off Flamborough Head in block 43/26 of the UK sector. It is perhaps surprising that, of the two plat­ forms, the Ravenspurn North CGS is of greater significance to the oil industry. In the UK over the last decade conventional wisdom has held that a steel jacket is the most economic substructure for a fixed plat­ form . In Norway, on the other hand, where there is a more limited indigenous steel­ making industry, the use of concrete gravity substructures has been encouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Hibernia Offshore Oil Platform St
    Hibernia Offshore Oil Platform St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Structural: Bridges & Marine Location: St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada Contractor: Kiewit with joint venture partner Norwegian Contractors Owner: ExxonMobil Canada (33.125%), Chevron Canada Resources (26.875%), Petro-Canada (20%), Canada Hibernia Holding Corporation (8.5%), Murphy Oil (6.5%) and Norsk Hydro (5%). The Hibernia Oil Field lies approximately 200 miles (315 km) east-southeast of St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. When an offshore platform was deemed necessary to tap this rich petroleum resource, engineers and developers faced serious challenges. The project had to meet a tight construction schedule while overcoming the problems of working in extremely cold weather conditions. The structure had to withstand the most severe environmental stresses of freezing and thawing, ice abrasion, wind and wave action, and chemical attack. In addition, the giant structure was required to float, be towed to the site, and after placement withstand the impact of 5.5 million ton iceberg. To satisfy the tough requirements, a reinforced Gravity Base Structure (GBS) was designed. Weighing more than 1.2 million tons, the Hibernia offshore platform is the largest floating structure ever built in North America. The base raft portion of the GBS was built in an earthen “dry dock.” By flooding the dock, the base raft was floated, towed to a deep-water harbor area, anchored, and construction continued. Once completed, this floating giant was towed to the oil field site and set in place on the ocean floor in about 240 ft. (80m) of water. The GBS was designed to be maintenance free for its 30-year life.
    [Show full text]
  • 908 Offshore Oil and Gas Safety I
    Offshore Oil and Gas Safety I This is the first of a two-part introduction to offshore safety practices. The information and resources provided in this course can help workers and employers identify and eliminate hazards related to offshore oil and gas platform safety activities. The course introduces applicable OSHA regulatory requirements, as well as industry standards and guidance aimed at identifying, preventing, and controlling exposure to hazards. This page intentionally blank OSHAcademy Course 908 Study Guide Offshore Oil and Gas Safety-Part 1 Copyright © 2017 Geigle Safety Group, Inc. No portion of this text may be reprinted for other than personal use. Any commercial use of this document is strictly forbidden. Contact OSHAcademy to arrange for use as a training document. This study guide is designed to be reviewed off-line as a tool for preparation to successfully complete OSHAcademy Course 908. Read each module, answer the quiz questions, and submit the quiz questions online through the course webpage. You can print the post-quiz response screen which will contain the correct answers to the questions. The final exam will consist of questions developed from the course content and module quizzes. We hope you enjoy the course and if you have any questions, feel free to email or call: OSHAcademy 15220 NW Greenbrier Parkway, Suite 230 Beaverton, Oregon 97006 www.oshatrain.org [email protected] +1 (888) 668-9079 Disclaimer This document does not constitute legal advice. Consult with your own company counsel for advice on compliance with all applicable state and federal regulations. Neither Geigle Safety Group, Inc., nor any of its employees, subcontractors, consultants, committees, or other assignees make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricanes and the Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Industry
    HURRICANES AND THE OFFShoRE OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY Every year, hurricanes of varying strength lay siege to America’s coasts. The images of wind-battered buildings and flooded lands are well-known - 2004 and 2005 were particularly destructive seasons. The impact of the 2005 storms on the vital energy infrastructure of the nation’s Outer Continental Shelf was severe, destroying 113 offshore platforms, seriously damaging 52 more and shutting-in significant quantities of the nation’s oil and natural gas production. But did you know: • there are over 4,000 platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, which means that more than 97 percent of the platforms survived these record-breaking storms? • there were no deaths or injuries among the 25,000 - 30,000 offshore workers because of stringent and effective safety regulations? • there were no significant spills from any offshore facility and the minimal oil that did escape from damaged pipelines has had no wildlife impacts? • most of the facilities damaged or destroyed by the storms were built prior to 1988 when more stringent construction specifications were mandated, while most built to meet the post-1988 requirements survived? • the offshore industry continuously works to improve its safety and environmental record, as well as improve the time needed to bring shut-in production back to consumers? More details follow on how the offshore industry contends with hurricane forces - the structural design innovations, the safeguards for employees and the environment, and the improvements being made in advance of future storms. 1120 G Street, NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20005 Tel 202-347-6900 Fax 202-347-8650 www.noia.org HURRICANES AND THE OFFShoRE OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY HURRICANE FACT: OFFShoRE PLATFORMS ARE DESIGNED TO SURVIVE KILLER STORMS ThE VAST MAJORITY OF OFFShoRE PLATFORMS AND RIGS Even the most ESCAPED SERIOUS DAMAGE DURING THE 2005 HURRICANE damaged facilities SEASON were salvageable.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Oil and Gas Platform Decommissioning: a Review of Practices and T Reefing Options ∗ Ann Scarborough Bull , Milton S
    Ocean and Coastal Management 168 (2019) 274–306 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean and Coastal Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman Worldwide oil and gas platform decommissioning: A review of practices and T reefing options ∗ Ann Scarborough Bull , Milton S. Love Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93016, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Consideration of whether to completely remove an oil and gas production platform from the seafloor or to leave Decommissioning the submerged jacket as a reef is an imminent decision for California, as a number of offshore platforms in both Offshore platforms state and federal waters are in the early stages of decommissioning. Laws require that a platform at the end of its Rigs-to-reefs production life be totally removed unless the submerged jacket section continues as a reef under state spon- Artificial reefs sorship. Consideration of the eventual fate of the populations of fishes and invertebrates beneath platforms has led to global reefing of the jacket portion of platforms instead of removal at the time of decommissioning. The construction and use of artificial reefs are centuries old and global in nature using a great variety ofmaterials. The history that led to the reefing option for platforms begins in the mid-20th century in an effort forgeneral artificial reefs to provide both fishing opportunities and increase fisheries production for a burgeoning U.S. population. The trend toward reefing platforms at end of their lives followed after the oil and gas industry installed thousands of standing platforms in the Gulf of Mexico where they had become popular fishing desti- nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy of the Sea: an Offshore Marine Research Facility
    energy of the sea: an offshore marine research facility a Thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of The University of Cincinnati in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture in The School of Architecture and Interior Design of The College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning 2007 by Benjamin Ian Cripe B.S. Arch, University of Cincinnati, 2005 Committee Chairwomen Elizabeth Rioden Aarati Kanekar Abstract Current trends in architecture have prevented sustainability from becoming a mainstream design solution and the general population is acutely unaware of the importance of sustainable design. Presently global warming, urban sprawl, and the overuse of natural resources are major concerns for the natural environment. This thesis investigation looks to the future when renewable energy sources may be the only source of power. In addition, designing on the ocean could soon become a reality due to city overcrowding and inadequate natural resource stewardship. The design intervention employs ocean waves to generate energy for a floating marine research facility located three miles off the coastline of Cape Mendocino, California. Acting as a self sustaining building, this facility not only uses ocean waves as its primary source of energy, but is also envisioned as an iconic structure which can serve as an educational model for sustainable design, floating architecture, and ocean wave energy. iii this pageintentionallyleft blank iv Contents Abstract .iii Contents .v Illustration
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Oil and Gas Industry to the Sustainable Development Goals
    MAPPING THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: AN ATLAS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document draws from a project originated by the UNDP, IFC, IPIECA, and the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI). The development of this document benefitted significantly from the input and review of many stakeholders. UNDP, IFC and IPIECA would like to thank the organizations and individuals that responded during the public consultation period in spring 2017. The comments received were of substantial value to the revision. We are also grateful to the experts from the partner organizations who contributed substantial personal effort in compiling this report. In addition, we would particularly like to thank David Kienzler (writer and researcher), Helen Campbell (copy editor) and Rikki Campbell Ogden (designer). DISCLAIMER This publication is intended for information purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither IPIECA, International Finance Corporation (IFC), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) nor any of their members past, present or future warrants its accuracy or will assume any liability (including negligence) for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made of this publication. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The information contained in this publication does not purport to constitute professional advice from the various content contributors and neither IPIECA, IFC or UNDP nor their members accept any responsibility whatsoever for the consequences arising from or in connection with the use or misuse of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Planning of Integrated Energy Systems for Offshore Oil Extraction and Processing Platforms
    Article Optimal Planning of Integrated Energy Systems for Offshore Oil Extraction and Processing Platforms Anan Zhang 1,2,*, Hong Zhang 1, Meysam Qadrdan 2, Wei Yang 1, Xiaolong Jin 2 and Jianzhong Wu 2 1 School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; [email protected] (H.Z.); [email protected] (W.Y.) 2 School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK; [email protected] (M.Q.); [email protected] (X.J.); [email protected] (J.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 January 2019; Accepted: 21 February 2019; Published: 24 February 2019 Abstract: With the introduction of new technologies, such as waste heat recovery units (WHRU), associated gas utilization, the energy flow coupling relationship is further deepened within the energy system of the offshore oil and gas production platform. Besides, the energy system is closely linked with the oil and gas production system, and a closed-loop relationship between energy flow and material flow can be revealed. Uncertainties of energy supply and production process may lead to system-wide fluctuations, which threaten the stable operation of the platform. Therefore, an optimal planning model of integrated energy system for offshore oil and gas production platform is proposed in this paper. Firstly, a generalized energy and material flow model is proposed, three matrixes are defined based on laws of thermodynamics, including energy matrix, process matrix and feedback matrix. Secondly, the energy-material conversion relationship between the energy system and production system of a typical offshore oil and gas platform is quantitatively described, together with the coupling between the input and output of the two systems.
    [Show full text]