DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Urban Tree Canopy Study Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Urban Tree Canopy Study Here Assessing Urban Tree Cover in the City of Atlanta: Phase 2 (Detecting Canopy Change 2008-2014) Prepared by: Center for Spatial Planning Analytics and Visualization (formerly known as the Center for Geographic Information Systems or CGIS) 760 Spring St Atlanta, GA 30332-0695 Office: 404-894-0127 Georgia Institute of Technology Investigators: Anthony Giarrusso, Associate Director (CSPAV), [email protected] Sponsor: City of Atlanta in the City of Atlanta 1 Acknowledgements Project Team: Principal Investigator: Anthony J. Giarrusso, Associate Director, Senior Research Scientist Center for Spatial Planning Analytics and Visualization ( Georgia Institute of Technology 760 Spring Street, Suite 230 Atlanta, GA 30308 Office: 404-894-0127 [email protected] Graduate Research Assistant Jeremy Nichols Center for Spatial Planning Analytics and Visualization Georgia Institute of Technology 760 Spring Street, Suite 230 Atlanta, GA 30308 The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the City of Atlanta. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The project team would like to acknowledge and thank the following individuals for their assistance on this project. Kathryn A. Evans, Senior Administrative Analyst, Tree Conservation Commission, Department of Planning and Development, Arborist Division Assessing Urban Tree Cover in the City of Atlanta The 2014 Canopy Study 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. 5 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Benefits of Urban Trees..................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 History of the Project ......................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Research Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Report Organization .......................................................................................................................... 14 2. Project Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Establishing the Workflow ................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Imagery Capture and Preparation ..................................................................................................... 15 2.4 Imagery Classification and Post Processing ..................................................................................... 15 2.5 Accuracy Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.6 Calculating Tree and Land Cover Statistics ...................................................................................... 18 2.7 Calculating Change between 2008-2014: Tree and Land Cover Statistics ...................................... 18 3. Data Analysis and Findings for 2014 ...................................................................................................... 19 3.1 City-wide Tree and Land Cover Totals .............................................................................................. 19 3.2 Other Geographies ............................................................................................................................ 22 3.3 Watersheds ....................................................................................................................................... 23 3.3 Sub-Watersheds ................................................................................................................................ 24 3.4 Parks.................................................................................................................................................. 26 3.5 Zoning ................................................................................................................................................ 28 3.6 Neighborhood Planning Units (NPU) ................................................................................................. 31 3.7 Council Districts ................................................................................................................................. 33 3.8 Neighborhoods .................................................................................................................................. 34 4. Change Analysis – Comparing 2008 and 2014 Data .............................................................................. 37 4.1 Change Analysis Explained ............................................................................................................... 37 4.2 City-Wide Change ............................................................................................................................. 38 4.3 Areas Losing UTC ............................................................................................................................. 40 4.4 Areas Gaining UTC ........................................................................................................................... 43 4.5 Canopy Change – Selected Geographies ......................................................................................... 45 4.5 Canopy Change Highlights – Selected Geographies ........................................................................ 46 5. Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 60 5.1 Discussion of Results ........................................................................................................................ 60 Assessing Urban Tree Cover in the City of Atlanta The 2014 Canopy Study 3 Table of Contents 5.2 Policy Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 67 5.3 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 67 6. Appendix 1 - Land Cover Maps by Selected Geographies ..................................................................... 69 6.1 Neighborhood Planning Units ............................................................................................................ 70 6.2 Neighborhoods .................................................................................................................................. 71 6.3 City Council Districts 6.4 Watersheds ............................................................................................... 72 6.5 Small Watersheds 6.6 Parks ............................................................................................................. 74 6.7 Zoning ................................................................................................................................................ 76 6.8 City Grid – (6 acre cells) .................................................................................................................... 77 7. Appendix 2 - Land Cover Graphs by Selected Geographies .................................................................. 78 7.1 Neighborhood Planning Units ............................................................................................................ 79 7.2 Neighborhoods .................................................................................................................................. 80 7.3 City Council Districts .......................................................................................................................... 81 7.4 Watersheds ....................................................................................................................................... 82 7.5 Small Watersheds ............................................................................................................................. 83 7.8 Parks.................................................................................................................................................. 84 7.9 Zoning ................................................................................................................................................ 85 8. Appendix 3 – Summary Land Cover Tables by Selected Geographies ................................................. 86 8.1 Neighborhood Planning Units ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bankruptcy Forms for Non-Individuals, Is Available
    Case 18-54196 Doc 1 Filed 03/09/18 Entered 03/09/18 16:18:38 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 340 3/09/18 4:13PM Fill in this information to identify your case: United States Bankruptcy Court for the: NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Case number (if known) Chapter 11 Check if this an amended filing Official Form 201 Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy 4/16 If more space is needed, attach a separate sheet to this form. On the top of any additional pages, write the debtor's name and case number (if known). For more information, a separate document, Instructions for Bankruptcy Forms for Non-Individuals, is available. 1. Debtor's name Layla Grayce, Inc. 2. All other names debtor used in the last 8 years Include any assumed names, trade names and doing business as names 3. Debtor's federal Employer Identification 30-0464821 Number (EIN) 4. Debtor's address Principal place of business Mailing address, if different from principal place of business 570 Colonial Park Drive #307 Roswell, GA 30075 Number, Street, City, State & ZIP Code P.O. Box, Number, Street, City, State & ZIP Code Fulton Location of principal assets, if different from principal County place of business Number, Street, City, State & ZIP Code 5. Debtor's website (URL) https://www.laylagrayce.com/ 6. Type of debtor Corporation (including Limited Liability Company (LLC) and Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)) Partnership (excluding LLP) Other. Specify: Official Form 201 Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy page 1 Case 18-54196 Doc 1 Filed 03/09/18 Entered 03/09/18 16:18:38 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 340 3/09/18 4:13PM Debtor Layla Grayce, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Westside Future Fund Creating the Conditions for Progress
    Westside Future Fund Creating the Conditions for Progress Westside Future Fund Target Neighborhoods • Four (4) neighborhoods totaling approximately 2.26 Square Miles: English Avenue, Vine City, Ashview Heights, and Atlanta University Center Understanding the Issues • The target Westside neighborhoods’ population has decreased by approximately 60% since 1960. Today, they have a population of about 15,568 residents. • 43% of WFF target area families live below the federal poverty line, with English Avenue at the highest percentage (59%). • The WFF target area’s housing vacancy rate (36%) is more than twice the City of Atlanta’s (17%) and more than three times the Atlanta metro’s (10%). • More than half (53%) of homes in the WFF target area are vacant lots or structures. Only 8% of properties are occupied by homeowners, compared to 45% in the City of Atlanta. • The median household income for the WFF target area is $24,778, with all four neighborhoods categorized as “very low- rietta St N e income,” earning less than 50% of the area average median income. Home Park W Knight Park/Howell Station Northsid Role of the Westside Future Fund Georgia Tech Marietta Street Artery • We are creating an alliance for change. Donald Lee Hollowell Pkwy NW North North The Westside Future Fund is building an alliance of business leaders, Ave Bankhead English Avenue philanthropists, community builders, and government officials focused on Grove Park transforming the lives of current and future residents of Atlanta’s Westside. Westside Future Fund Vine City Downtown Hunter Hills Washington Park • Creating the conditions for progress. Mercedes-Benz Stadium Martin Luther King Jr Dr We exist to organize and fuel Westside revitalization efforts, Castleberry Hill contributing to the work through: Mozley Park Ashview Heights AUC 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlanta Preservation Center's
    THE ATLANTA PRESERVATION CENTER’S Phoenix2017 Flies A CELEBRATION OF ATLANTA’S HISTORIC SITES FREE CITY-WIDE EVENTS PRESERVEATLANTA.COM Welcome to Phoenix Flies ust as the Grant Mansion, the home of the Atlanta Preservation Center, was being constructed in the mid-1850s, the idea of historic preservation in America was being formulated. It was the invention of women, specifically, the ladies who came J together to preserve George Washington’s Mount Vernon. The motives behind their efforts were rich and complicated and they sought nothing less than to exemplify American character and to illustrate a national identity. In the ensuing decades examples of historic preservation emerged along with the expanding roles for women in American life: The Ladies Hermitage Association in Nashville, Stratford in Virginia, the D.A.R., and the Colonial Dames all promoted preservation as a mission and as vehicles for teaching contributive citizenship. The 1895 Cotton States and International Exposition held in Piedmont Park here in Atlanta featured not only the first Pavilion in an international fair to be designed by a woman architect, but also a Colonial Kitchen and exhibits of historic artifacts as well as the promotion of education and the arts. Women were leaders in the nurture of the arts to enrich American culture. Here in Atlanta they were a force in the establishment of the Opera, Ballet, and Visual arts. Early efforts to preserve old Atlanta, such as the Leyden Columns and the Wren’s Nest were the initiatives of women. The Atlanta Preservation Center, founded in 1979, was championed by the Junior League and headed by Eileen Rhea Brown.
    [Show full text]
  • VILLAGE at CHOSEWOOD PARK Mixed-Use Site CITY of ATLANTA, GEORGIA
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRTA DRI REVIEW PACKAGE, DRI No. 1263 for VILLAGE AT CHOSEWOOD PARK Mixed-Use Site CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Site Plan Elements Traffic Impact Analysis Facility Needs Analysis Area of Influence Analysis Air Quality Benchmark Statement DRI Review Criteria Prepared for: BHC Property Group January 2007 3090 Premiere Parkway • Suite 200 Duluth, Georgia 30097 T: 770.813.0882 F: 770.813.0688 www.streetsmarts.us TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................... A 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................1 General Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction to the Study Process........................................................................................... 2 2. SITE DESCRIPTION / SITE PLAN ELEMENTS ..................................................................................4 Site Description .......................................................................................................................... 4 Types and Amounts of Development..............................................................................4 Site Parking Requirements .................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary
    REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary ................................................................5 Summary of Resources ...........................................................6 Regionally Important Resources Map ................................12 Introduction ...........................................................................13 Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value .................21 Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ..................................48 Areas of Scenic and Agricultural Value ..............................79 Appendix Cover Photo: Sope Creek Ruins - Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area/ Credit: ARC Tables Table 1: Regionally Important Resources Value Matrix ..19 Table 2: Regionally Important Resources Vulnerability Matrix ......................................................................................20 Table 3: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ...........46 Table 4: General Policies and Protection Measures for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ................47 Table 5: National Register of Historic Places Districts Listed by County ....................................................................54 Table 6: National Register of Historic Places Individually Listed by County ....................................................................57 Table 7: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ............................77 Table 8: General Policies
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH Highland AVENUE
    NORTH hIGhLAND AVENUE study December, 1999 North Highland Avenue Transportation and Parking Study Prepared by the City of Atlanta Department of Planning, Development and Neighborhood Conservation Bureau of Planning In conjunction with the North Highland Avenue Transportation and Parking Task Force December 1999 North Highland Avenue Transportation and Parking Task Force Members Mike Brown Morningside-Lenox Park Civic Association Warren Bruno Virginia Highlands Business Association Winnie Curry Virginia Highlands Civic Association Peter Hand Virginia Highlands Business Association Stuart Meddin Virginia Highlands Business Association Ruthie Penn-David Virginia Highlands Civic Association Martha Porter-Hall Morningside-Lenox Park Civic Association Jeff Raider Virginia Highlands Civic Association Scott Riley Virginia Highlands Business Association Bill Russell Virginia Highlands Civic Association Amy Waterman Virginia Highlands Civic Association Cathy Woolard City Council – District 6 Julia Emmons City Council Post 2 – At Large CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VISION STATEMENT Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1:1 Purpose 1:1 Action 1:1 Location 1:3 History 1:3 The Future 1:5 Chapter 2 TRANSPORTATION OPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUES 2:1 Introduction 2:1 Motorized Traffic 2:2 Public Transportation 2:6 Bicycles 2:10 Chapter 3 PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUES 3:1 Sidewalks and Crosswalks 3:1 Public Areas and Gateways 3:5 Chapter 4 PARKING OPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUES 4:1 On Street Parking 4:1 Off Street Parking 4:4 Chapter 5 VIRGINIA AVENUE OPPORTUNITIES
    [Show full text]
  • THE Inman Park
    THE Inman Park Advocator Atlanta’s Small Town Downtown News • Newsletter of the Inman Park Neighborhood Association November 2015 [email protected] • inmanpark.org • 245 North Highland Avenue NE • Suite 230-401 • Atlanta 30307 Volume 43 • Issue 11 Coming Soon BY DENNIS MOBLEY • [email protected] Inman Park Holiday Party I’m pr obably showing my Friday,2015 December 11 • 7:30 pm – 11:00 pm age, but I can remember the phrase “coming soon to a The Trolley Barn • 963 Edgewood Avenue theater near you” like it was yesterday. In this case, I The annual Inman Park Holiday Party returns wanted to give our readers a heads-up as to what they can to The Trolley Barn this year. Don’t miss this expect with our conversion to chance to meet and visit with fellow Inman President’s Message the MemberClicks-powered Park neighborsHoliday over food, drinks Party and dancing. IPNA website and associated membership management software. Enjoy heavy hors d’oeuvres catered by Stone By the time you read this November issue of the Advocator, some Soup and complimentaryAnnouncement beer and wine. A 400+ of you will have received an email from our Vice President DJ will be there to spin a delightful mix of old of Communications, James McManus, notifying you that you standards and newMissing favorites. So don your are believed to be a current IPNA member in good standing. (We holiday fi nest and join us for a good time! gleaned this list of 400+ from our current database and believe it to be fairly accurate).
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory & Analysis
    Inventory & Analysis Overview The Plan’s recommendations will transform the Howard Property from a residential lot into a passive green neighborhood park. The plan provides for quiet, safe woodland setting with carefully renewed native plantings with an internal trail system that connects to the larger Beltline trail that connects to surrounding neighborhoods. Park Description and Context Upper Lawn in 2007 Comprising approximately five acres at 471 Collier Road, the Howard Property is a significant new passive park bounded by Tanyard Creek, Overbrook Drive and Collier Road. Acquired in 2006 to provide the “missing link” for the BeltLine Trail between Tanyard Creek Park and the City of Atlanta’s Bobby Jones Golf Course, the site offers passive opportunities at a neighborhood scale. Trail design by the PATH Foundation, under the auspices of Atlanta BeltLine inc. and the City of Atlanta’s Department of Parks Recreation & Cultural Affairs, was under way spring of 2008. With the assistance of the Trust for Public Land the land assemblage was completed in 2006. Residential structures on the site were demolished in 2007. This Master Plan is to identify and plan for various landscape works to further clean up the site and make it more useable and maintainable. Members of the community expressed a desire to undertake a master planning exercise to identify opportunities for amenities (seating, secondary pathways, plantings, etc.) and management zones (areas for naturalization, passive open lawn space, garden development, etc.) 5 Master Planning Process The Howard Property Master Plan was announced at the BeltLine Subarea Study Group Meeting of May 5, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Castleberry Hill Summerhill Georgia State Fa I R L Ie -P O P
    WSB Building PEACHTREE ST Ansley Park ROCK SPRINGS RD Playhouse Peachtree ROBIN HOOD RD Savannah Christian Peachtree College of Church Pointe CUMBERLAND RD Art & Design WEST PEACHTREE ST BEVERLY RD CUMBERLAND RD Equifax Rhodes Hall SPRING ST AVERLY DR PIEDMONT AVE PE ACH TRE E CI MADDOX DR RC THE PRADO LE PEACHTREE ST HOWELL MILL ROAD Federal Home Loan Bank Museum of William Breman Contemporary Art 75 PARK LN Pershing (MOCA GA) Jewish Heritage Park 85 Museum John Marshall Law School 18TH ST Pershing Park HILLPINE DR Center Plaza 17TH ST for 17TH ST Puppetry Arts PEACHTREE CIRCLE Pershing Point Plaza MIDDLESEX AVE Center PEACHTREE ST Marriott Stage 17TH ST Residence Inn WESTMINISTER DR Atlantic Atlanta INMAN ST Station ANSLEY PARK The Peachtree NEIGHBORHOOD Midtown MORNINGSIDE DR Plaza II Midtown PRADO Plaza I 17 TH ST Midtown Heights Atlanta ARTS CENTER WAY 201 17th 171 17th Botanical NORTHSIDE DR Street Street Atlanta Fulton Garden First County Library S PRADO 17TH ST Presbyterian WESTMINISTER ST Church Peachtree Branch Winn Park BARKSDALE WILLIAMS ST SPRING ST WEST PEACHTREE ST Granada 16TH ST LAFAYETTE DR Suites Hotel 16TH ST High Museum 16TH ST of Art Woodruff Arts Center WALKER TER Memorial Arts Building FOWLER ST Alliance Theatre STATE ST & Atlanta ARTS CENTER Symphony Orchestra First LYLE ST ATLANTIC ST FRANCIS ST HOLLY ST BARNES ST Church of Christ Scientist AMSTERDAM AVE MECASLIN ST 15TH ST 15TH ST YONAH DR 15TH ST 15TH ST AMSTERDAM AVE 15TH ST PIEDMONT AVE WILLIAMS ST Whole World NORTH HIGHLAND AVE Theatre HOME PARK TECHWOOD DR NEIGHBORHOOD Norfolk Promenade II Southern Colony Square One Atlantic Atlantic Sheraton Center Center Hotel Plaza 1180 Peachtree MONROE DR 14TH ST 14TH ST 14TH PL HIGHLAND TERRACE 14TH ST Marriott Four Suites Seasons Proscenium 14TH ST Hotel Hotel Piedmont Park PARK DR 14th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Beltline Subarea 3 Master Plan Update April 14, 2018 Workshop Meeting
    Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update April 14, 2018 Workshop Meeting 1 22 miles, connecting 45 neighborhoods 22 1,100 ACRES MILES of environmental of transit clean-up $10-20B 46 in economic development MILES of streetscapes and complete 30,000 48,000 streets permanent jobs construction jobs 28,000 33 new housing units MILES of urban trails 5,600 affordable units 1,300 CORRIDOR- ACRES of new greenspace WIDE public art, 700 historic preservation, ACRES of renovated greenspace and arboretum Atlanta BeltLine Vision & Mission To be the catalyst for making We are delivering transformative public infrastructure Atlanta a global beacon for that enhances mobility, fosters culture, and improves equitable, inclusive, and connections to opportunity. We are building a more sustainable city life. socially and economically resilient Atlanta with our partner organizations and host communities through job creation, inclusive transportation systems, affordable housing, and public spaces for all. 3 Meeting Agenda • Subarea Master Plan Update Purpose and Process • Presentation • Introduction to Planning Process • Project Schedule • Existing Conditions Analysis • Revitalization Nodes • Connectivity Barriers • DRAFT Street Framework & Greenway Trails Plan • Input Activities • Information Boards • Revitalization Nodes • DRAFT Street Framework & Greenway Trails Plan • Presentation Repeat 4 Subarea Master Plan Purpose • Goal - To implement the Redevelopment Plan goals in the context of each unique geographic area • Purpose – To guide growth for vibrant,
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood Profile: Lakewood Heights
    Neighborhood Profile: Lakewood Heights Investment Area Typology: Vulnerable Total Single Family Parcels Total Multi-Family Parcels Total Commercial/Industrial/Public Parcels Vacant Lots Unsurveyable Parcels Total Parcels 685 1 173 132 144 1135 Legend Structure Condition Green Space 210 Good # of Structu r e s : 327 Vacant Structures # of Structures: # of Vacant L o t s : 132 Fair # of Structur e s : 221 No Structure Poor # of Structur e s : 114 Not Visible # of Structure s : 3 Inset Map Deteriorated # of Structure s : 21 No Data Available # of Structure s : 144 M IL T O T R S ENGLEWOOD A N E VE A K V T j[ E C Adair Park Peoplestown N I O R Pittsburgh M T W CLIMAX ST Boulevard Heights T D L C I D D S A N O M L LINCOLN ST H O N L I O C N AVE R U I L H Englewood Manor ERIN AVE R A E G A A H K D B M NOLAN ST D R K E ORD L R MANF M V IL A W NFO N RD RD D T A A DILL AVE O O T V H S O N E E S H L V E Phoenix II Park D A L G BURRO U U A V V A I B E R O S j[ V A CUS B TER AVE L S N Capitol View Manor E A T E BISBEE AVE S H H T Benteen Park F A LYNNHAVEN DR I E E M [V L j High Point T O D Chosewood Park A S U S N DECKNER AVE R N T E j[ Y South Atlanta O Capitol View E NGF j[ T A ORD JR PL A L T V Kimpson Park S N R E E BROWN AV N Emma Millican Park E U U T B F H S D ST NNE N T A L R L R A R ST O K O N ET A R T C T GA The Villages at Carver R R S MA C N S I PARK AVE I A E N L D T P N W G j[ R S T N A M S E S R P LDON AVE O Joyland H U T O C K S O T Y CLAIRE TAFT ST C S DR N R I A R E T H P W W WEN AVE ET O HIPP ST D BO L T R N A S A W H W O TURMAN AVE T E D L Amal Heights L R T I P S L C Y RHODESIA AVE E E R L T T V A O A S H L Y D W L L R R U E IC Sylvan Hills ADAIR AVE O T P H Betmar LaVilla G W M A S O T E N ASHWOOD AVE V D S CLAIRE DR A Sou A th E D T V R Y N S A V E i I E v E B N e R L V r D W r HILLSIDE AV A E O E R e D O IR I iv O H Thomasville Heights A R C FAIR DR F A R O S K F h W E K t E T S C u K B GRANT ST o I C o A D u P I S L O R A ST t D O EN h P W O HEL R R LA E W K iv Lakewood Heights e R r N F O S R R Y S South Bend Park E M o D R u E I P John C.
    [Show full text]