The State of Cameroon's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The State of Cameroon's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture COUNTRY REPORTS THE STATE OF CAMEROON’S BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE This country report has been prepared by the national authorities as a contribution to the FAO publication, The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. The report is being made available by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) as requested by the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of FAO, or its Members. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. MINISTRY OFAGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (MINADER) THE STATE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN CAMEROON November 2015 MINISTRY OFAGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (MINADER) THE STATE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN CAMEROON November 2015 i CITATION This document will be cited as: MINADER (2015). The State of Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture in the Republic of Cameroon. For further information contact the following address Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Telephone: +(237) 222 231 190 Fax: +(237) 222 225 091 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.minader.gov.cm COVER PICTURES Top left: Coffea montekupensis (Cheek &al., 2004) Top middle:Tryonomys swinderianus (Vivien J., 1991) Top right: Gnetum Africana (Bechem &al., 2012) Bottom left:Parapenaeopsis atlantica (Njeng G.A., 2015) Bottom middle: Garcinia kola (Awono &al., 2000) Bottom right: Psittacus erithacus (Hartwig &al., 1990) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................. ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ ix LIST OF PLATES..................................................................................................................................................ix FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................................... ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... xiii GLOSSARY OF TERMS ...................................................................................................................................... xvi PROCEDURE USED IN PREPARING THE REPORT ............................................................................................ xix INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... .............1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE COUNTRY AND TO THE ROLE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ............................................................................................................................................. ......3 1.1.Background ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1. Geography ........................................................................................................................................... ....3 1.1.2. Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1.3. Human activities......................................................................................................................................7 1.1.4. Population and Administration ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1.5. Economy ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Background Information Sheet ................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.1. Principal Products from Cameroon’s Biodiversity ................................................................................... 9 1.2.2. Role of Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture ....................................................................................... 12 1.2.3. Generalitieson the Biodiversity ofCameroon ......................................................................................... 12 1.2.4. Production Systems Present in the Country ........................................................................................... 20 1.2.5. Description of various production systems ............................................................................................ 21 1.2.6. Area under Production ........................................................................................................................... 26 1.2.7. Export Local Consumption and Effects on Biodiversity and Services ..................................................... 28 1.2.8 Impact of production activities on biodiversity.......................................................................................28 CHAPTER 2:DRIVERS OF CHANGE ................................................................................................................... 30 2.1 Drivers Affecting Extent and Distribution of Forest/Wildlife Productionin Cameroon ......................... 30 2.2 Effect of climate change on associated biodiversity .............................................................................. 31 2.3 Effect of Drivers of change on ecosystem services .................................................................................. 33 2.4. Effect of Drivers of change on wild foods................................................................................................38 2.5. Main drivers affecting availability, diversity and knowledge of wild plants and animals.....................39 2.6. Drivers with significant effect on involvement of women . ................................................................... 41 2.7. Drivers with most significant effect on use and maintenance of traditional knowledge......................42 iii 2.8. Drivers which significantly improve food security and sustainability ................................................... 44 2.9. Counter-measures to reduce adverse consequences of drivers ............................................................ 46 CHAPTER 3: THE STATE AND TRENDS OF BIODIVERSITYFOR FOOD AGRICULTURE IN CAMEROON ............ 49 3.1. Cameroon biodiversity status, trends and threats ................................................................................. 49 3.1.1. General Characteristics ............................................................................................................... 49 3.2.Biodiversitystatus ............................................................................................................................ 51 3.2.1. Ecosystems ................................................................................................................................. 51 3.2.2. Habitats ..................................................................................................................................... 53 3.2.3. Species ....................................................................................................................................... 54 3.3. Trends ........................................................................................................................................... 54 3.3.1. Conservation .............................................................................................................................. 56 3.3.2. Habitat Recovery Measures ........................................................................................................ 56 3.3.3. Artificial Regeneration Programs ................................................................................................. 58 3.4. ChangesandTrendsinBiodiversityComponents .................................................................................. 58 3.4.1. Marine and Coastal Ecosystem .................................................................................................... 58 3.4.2. Tropical Humid Dense Forest Ecosystem ...................................................................................... 59 3.4.3. Tropical Woodland Savannah Ecosystem ....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Back Grou Di Formatio O the Co Servatio Status of Bubi Ga Ad We Ge Tree
    BACK GROUD IFORMATIO O THE COSERVATIO STATUS OF BUBIGA AD WEGE TREE SPECIES I AFRICA COUTRIES Report prepared for the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). by Dr Jean Lagarde BETTI, ITTO - CITES Project Africa Regional Coordinator, University of Douala, Cameroon Tel: 00 237 77 30 32 72 [email protected] June 2012 1 TABLE OF COTET TABLE OF CONTENT......................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................... 4 ABREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................. 5 ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................... 6 0. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................10 I. MATERIAL AND METHOD...........................................................................................11 1.1. Study area..................................................................................................................11 1.2. Method ......................................................................................................................12 II. BIOLOGICAL DATA .....................................................................................................14 2.1. Distribution of Bubinga and Wengé species in Africa.................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Some Technologies Developed by the Food Technology Laboratory of the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development: Case of Cocoa, Coffee and Rice
    Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 8, No. 1; 2016 ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Evaluation of Some Technologies Developed by the Food Technology Laboratory of the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development: Case of Cocoa, Coffee and Rice Guemche Sillag Jeanne Irène1, Patience Bongse Kari Andoseh2, Tchamba Joël1 & Pauline Mounjouenpou2 1 The University of Jean Paul II Yaounde, Yaounde, Cameroon 2 Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Yaounde, Cameroon Correspondence: Guemche Sillag Jeanne Irène, The University of Jean Paul II Yaounde, Yaounde, Cameroon. E-mail: [email protected] Received: August 24, 2015 Accepted: September 27, 2015 Online Published: December 15, 2015 doi:10.5539/jas.v8n1p195 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v8n1p195 Abstract The cultivation of plant such as cocoa, coffee and rice is practised by a large number of rural Cameroonian populations. Unfortunately, they are the most suffering of malnutrition, food insecurity and poverty. To improve their livelihoods, the Food Technology Laboratory (FTL) has developed some simple and innovative techniques to transform cocoa, coffee and rice and transferred them to producers. This study aims to evaluate the adoption of those innovations by producers. The survey was conducted in five most important markets in Yaoundé and in one pilot village named Bialanguéna. Data were analysed based on a comparison of the state before and after the acquisition of innovative technologies by producers. Changes observed in the food and economic habits were evaluated. The results show that cocoa products are the most adopted ones. Bialanguena women and Yaounde cocoa producers convert some cocoa beans to cocoa powder and cocoa butter for their therapeutic and nutritive needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan D'aménagement FC Djoum
    REGION DU SUD REPREPUUUUBLIQUEBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN --------------- -------------------------------------------------- DEPARTEMENT DU DJA ET LOBO Paix ––– Travail --- Patrie --------------- -------------------------------------------------- ARRONDISSEMENT DE DJOUM --------------- COMMUNE COUNCIL COMMUNE DJOUM Prestataire : Les Etablissements MEDINOF agréés aux inventaires Plan d’aménagement de la forêt communale de Djoum Page - 1 - INTRODUCTION La loi forestière de 1994 a marqué la volonté manifeste de l’administration en charge des forêts à décentraliser la gestion des ressources forestières. On a ainsi vu apparaître les concepts de forêt communautaire et des forêts communales. Les communes prenaient ainsi la possibité d’acquérir et de gérer une partie du domaine forestier permanent (art 20 de la loi de 1994) pour leur propre compte. La Commune dispose à cet effet de toutes les ressources fauniques et floristiques qui s’y trouvent à condition de respecter les prescriptions du plan d’aménagement approuvé par l’administration. Par décret N° 2002/1070/PM/ du 19 juin 2002 du 1 er Ministre, il a été classé une portion de 15 270 ha de forêt dans le domaine privé de la commune de Djoum. Conformément aux dispositions des textes en vigueur, cette forêt ne peut entrée en exploitation qu’après la validation de son plan d’aménagement. La Commune devait ainsi réaliser : - la cartographie de base de ce massif ; - un inventaire d’aménagement pour une meilleure connaissance du potentiel ligneux qui s’y trouve ; - une étude socio-économique pour évaluer le niveau de pression que connaît ce massif de la part des populations et leurs attentes par rapport à son exploitation ; - rédiger un plan d’aménagement ressortant les prescriptions de gestion de ce massif forestier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics and Implications of the Coffee Economy in Tubah Sub-Division, 1934-2005
    International Journal of African and Asian Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2409-6938 An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.38, 2017 The Dynamics and Implications of the Coffee Economy in Tubah Sub-Division, 1934-2005 Canute Ambe Ngwa Higher Teacher Training College, Bambili, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon Divine Achenui Nwenfor Department of History, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon Abstract That the coffee economy in Tubah is at a development cul-de-sac and requires an overhaul is unquestionable. The article introduces the sustainable coffee challenge and the circumstances that made the sector unsustainable and suffered a decline in Tubah. It has been argued that coffee economy in Tubah was introduced as a substitute to the legitimate trade and owed its unsustainability and eventual decline to the outbreak of the economic crisis in the 1980s. Such argument is often pegged to the grievances of the poor angry farmers who were victims of the economic crisis and appear to have written off the benefits of the coffee sector on their livelihoods in the past. Contrary to such orthodox, this paper argues that the natural environment of Tubah alongside colonial influence provided the potential for the emergence of the coffee economy. It is further illustrated that coffee cultivation and commercialization mechanisms in Tubah evolved with time and circumstances. The lack of farm subsidies and the fall in the price of the commodity in the world market left the farmers in a state of dilemma. The paper also exposes the view that the coffee economy, in spite its constraints, resulted in beneficial socio- economic mutations in Tubah.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Successions After Shifting Cultivation in a Dense Tropical Forest of Southern Cameroon (Central Africa)
    Secondary successions after shifting cultivation in a dense tropical forest of southern Cameroon (Central Africa) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften vorgelegt beim Fachbereich 15 der Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main von Barthélemy Tchiengué aus Penja (Cameroon) Frankfurt am Main 2012 (D30) vom Fachbereich 15 der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität als Dissertation angenommen Dekan: Prof. Dr. Anna Starzinski-Powitz Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Katharina Neumann Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Wittig Datum der Disputation: 28. November 2012 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 2 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION .................................................................................. 4 2.2. GEOLOGY AND RELIEF ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.3. SOIL ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4. HYDROLOGY .................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5. CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Cecropia (Urticaceae) Introductions in Malesia: Addressing the Confusion
    Blumea 57, 2012: 136–142 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651912X657567 The status of Cecropia (Urticaceae) introductions in Malesia: addressing the confusion B.J. Conn1, J.T. Hadiah2, B.L. Webber3 Key words Abstract As part of the great global movement of plants in the 18th and 19th centuries, many valuable and com- mercial plants were sent from the Neotropics to Europe as seeds or as live specimens. Cecropia (Urticaceae) alien was in cultivation in England in 1789, yet species delimitation was not well-understood until much later, long after Cecropia subsequent introductions to other tropical regions where alien populations are now invasive. The earliest record of Indonesia Cecropia being cultivated in Malesia is based on material of C. peltata thought to have been sent from the Royal invasion history Botanic Gardens Kew to ’s Lands Plantentuin (Buitenzorg) in Jawa, Indonesia, sometime between 1862 and early Jawa 1868. In 1902, C. peltata was first cultivated in the botanical gardens of Singapore and introduced to Peninsular Malaysia Malaysia in 1954. The source of these latter introductions is uncertain. Many researchers have assumed that plant identification C. peltata is the only species of Cecropia introduced in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. We confirm that Singapore C. peltata is naturalised in Singapore and is invasive on the island of Jawa, Indonesia, and in Peninsular Malaysia. Urticaceae However, a second introduced species, C. pachystachya, has also been discovered as invasive in both Jawa and Singapore. There is no evidence for the third previously introduced species, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Phenology: Bi-Annual Rhythms and Interannual Variation in an Afrotropical Butterfly Assemblage 1, 2 3 4 ANU VALTONEN, FREERK MOLLEMAN, COLIN A
    Tropical phenology: bi-annual rhythms and interannual variation in an Afrotropical butterfly assemblage 1, 2 3 4 ANU VALTONEN, FREERK MOLLEMAN, COLIN A. CHAPMAN, JAMES R. CAREY, 5 1 MATTHEW P. AYRES, AND HEIKKI ROININEN 1Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu FI-80101 Finland 2Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu EE-51014 Estonia 3Department of Anthropology and McGill School of Environment, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T7 Canada 4Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA 5Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 USA Citation: Valtonen, A., F. Molleman, C. A. Chapman, J. R. Carey, M. P. Ayres, and H. Roininen. 2013. Tropical phenology: bi-annual rhythms and interannual variation in an Afrotropical butterfly assemblage. Ecosphere 4(3):36. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/ES12-00338.1 Abstract. Temporal variation and phenology of tropical insect communities and the role of environmental factors controlling this variation is poorly understood. A better understanding is needed, for example, to predict the effects of climate change on tropical insect communities and to assess the long- term persistence of tropical communities. We studied seasonal and inter-annual variation in tropical fruit- feeding butterflies by exploiting a unique 137-month abundance time series of .100 species, sampled at 22 locations in the medium altitude montane rain forest of Kibale National Park, western Uganda. Precipitation peaked twice per year, about 20 d after each equinox. Vegetation greenness peaked approximately 33 d later. Species richness and abundance of butterflies peaked about 2 and 3 months, respectively, after the greenness peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana R-PP (Annexes)
    Ghana R-PP (Annexes) Annexes Annexes ..................................................................................................... 1 Annex 1a: National Readiness Management Arrangements ..................................................... 2 Annexes for 1b: Stakeholder Consultations Held So Far on the R-PP ......................................... 5 Annex 1b-4: Stakeholder Consultations and Participation Plan (for R-PP Implementation) ............ 31 Annex 2b: REDD Strategy Options ................................................................................. 48 Annex 2c: REDD Implementation Framework .................................................................... 84 Annex 2d: Social and Environmental Impact Assessment ..................................................... 84 Annex 3: Reference Scenario ....................................................................................... 90 Annex 4: Monitoring System ........................................................................................ 90 Annex 6: Program Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................... 90 Annex 7: Background Paper ........................................................................................ 91 A. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 91 A. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 94 A. THE CONTEXT ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants Diversity and Ethnobotany With
    VASCULAR PLANTS DIVERSITY AND ETHNOBOTANY WITH EMPHASIS TO TRADITIONAL MEDICINAL AND WILD EDIBLE PLANTS IN DUGDA DAWA DISTRICT OF BORANA ZONE, OROMIA REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA Mersha Ashagre Eshete Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa, Ethiopia April 2017 VASCULAR PLANTS DIVERSITY AND ETHNOBOTANY WITH EMPHASIS TO TRADITIONAL MEDICINAL AND WILD EDIBLE PLANTS IN DUGDA DAWA DISTRICT OF BORANA ZONE, OROMIA REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA Mersha Ashagre Eshete A Thesis Submitted to The Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management Presented in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management) Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa, Ethiopia April 2017 i ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE PROGRAMMES This is to certify that the thesis prepared by Mersha Ashagre Eshete, entitled: “Vascular Plants Diversity and Ethnobotany with Emphasis to Traditional Medicinal and Wild Edible Plants in Dugda Dawa District of Borana Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia”, and submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by Research Supervisors: Name Signature Date 1. _____________________ _________________ _____________ 2.______________________ _________________ _____________ 3._____________________ _________________ ______________ 4.____________________ __________________ _______________ _____________________
    [Show full text]
  • De 45 Adjoints D'administration
    AO/CBGI REPUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN REPUBLIC OF CAMEROON Paix –Travail – Patrie Peace – Work – Fatherland -------------- --------------- MINISTERE DE LA FONCTION PUBLIQUE MINISTRY OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE ET DE LA REFORME ADMINISTRATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM --------------- --------------- SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT GENERAL --------------- --------------- DIRECTION DU DEVELOPPEMENT DEPARTMENT OF STATE HUMAN DES RESSOURCES HUMAINES DE L’ETAT RESSOURCES DEVELOPMENT --------------- --------------- SOUS-DIRECTION DES CONCOURS SUB DEPARTMENT OF EXAMINATIONS ------------------ -------------------- CONCOURS DIRECT POUR LE RECRUTEMENT DE 45 ADJOINTS D’ADMINISTRATION SESSION 2020 CENTRE D’EBOLOWA LISTE DES CANDIDATS AUTORISÉS À SUBIR LES ÉPREUVES ÉCRITES DU 12 SEPTEMBRE 2020 RÉGION DÉPARTEMENT NO MATRICULE NOMS ET PRÉNOMS DATE ET LIEU DE NAISSANCE SEXE LANGUE D’ORIGINE D’ORIGINE 1. AAL4428 ABESSOLO BELINGA MARQUISE 07/07/1998 A EBOLOWA F SU MVILA F 2. AAL1019 ABOMO MINKOULOU MONIQUE AURELIE 28/12/1992 A BENGBIS F SU DJA ET LOBO F 3. AAL5292 ABOSSSOLO MARTHE BRINDA 15/12/2000 A EBOLOWA F SU MVILA F 4. AAL3243 ABOUTOU MEBA CAROLE DEBORA 03/06/1996 A SANGMELIMA F SU DJA ET LOBO F 5. AAL2622 ADA MBEA CHRISTELLE FALONNE 10/06/1995 A MENDJIMI F SU VALLEE DU NTEM F 6. AAL1487 ADJOMO OBAME JOSSELINE 28/08/1993 A YAOUNDE F SU DJA ET LOBO F 7. AAL3807 AFA'A POMBA VALERE GHISLAIN 28/04/1997 A AWAE M SU DJA ET LOBO F 8. AAL4597 AFANE BERTHOLD 15/11/1998 A KONGO-NDONG M SU DJA ET LOBO F MINFOPRA/SG/DDRHE/SDC|Liste générale des candidats Adjoints d’Administration, session 2020_Ebolowa Page 1 9. AAL4787 AFANE MALORY 27/05/1999 A MBILEMVOM F SU DJA ET LOBO F 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Camel Forage Variety in the Karamoja Sub-Region, Uganda
    Salamula et al. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice (2017) 7:8 Pastoralism: Research, Policy DOI 10.1186/s13570-017-0080-6 and Practice RESEARCH Open Access Camel forage variety in the Karamoja sub- region, Uganda Jenipher Biira Salamula1*, Anthony Egeru1,2, Daniel Knox Aleper3 and Justine Jumba Namaalwa1 Abstract Camels have the potential to increase the resilience of pastoral communities to the impacts of climate variability and change. Despite this potential, there is limited documentation of the camel forage species, their availability and distribution. The study was conducted in Karamoja sub-region in Uganda and involved assessment of vegetation with intent to characterize the range of forage species available for camels in the region. The camel grazing area was stratified based on land cover types, namely woodland, bushland, grassland and farmland using the Amudat and Moroto district vegetation maps. Vegetation plots measuring 20 m × 20 m were mapped out among the land cover types where species identification was undertaken. In addition, a cross-sectional survey involving 52 camel herders was used to document the camel forage species preferences. Shannon and Simpson diversity indices as well as the Jaccard coefficient were used to measure the species richness, relative abundance, diversity and plant community similarities among the land cover types. Results showed high species richness and diversities in the bushland and woodland land cover types. Plant communities in the woodland and bushlands were found to be more similar. A wide range of plant species were reported to be preferred by camels in the study area, that is 63 in Amudat and 50 in Moroto districts.
    [Show full text]