DOCSLIB.ORG

Free Speech Yearbook: 1972. INSTITUTION Speech Communication Association,New York, N.Y

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 071 122 CS 500 097 ADTHOR Tedford, Thomas L., Ed. TITLE Free Speech Yearbook: 1972. INSTITUTION Speech Communication Association,New York, N.Y. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 142p. AVAILABLE FROMSpeech Communication Association,Statler Hilton Hotel, New York, N.Y. 10001 ($2.50) ERRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; Censorship; *CivilLiberties; Court Doctrine; *Freedom of Speech; GreekCivilization; *Social Attitudes; Student Opinion;Supreme Court Litigation ABSTRACT This book is a collection ofessays on free speech. issues and attitudes, compiled bythe Commission on Freedom of Speech of the Speech CommunicationAssociation. Four articles focuson freedom of speech in classroomsituations as follows:a philosophic view of teaching free speech, effectsof a course on free speechon student attitudes, historicalessentials of teaching free speech,and two opposing views on teacher attitudeson free speech in the communications classroom. Subjects ofother essays are: the judicial process in relation to freedom of speech;freedom of speech in ancient Athens; a case in which theAmerican Civil Liberties Union sought limitations on freedom ofspeech; the opposing philosophiesof Thomas Hobbes and John Stuart Mill;the rhetoric of intimidationin Indiana during.World War I; andSupreme Court decisions relating to the First Amendment during its1971-1972 term. The book ends withan extensive bibliography of articles,books, and court decisions relating to freedom of speechand published between July 1971and June 1972. (RN) rJ;freeperil ljearbook:1972 ,c.! a publication of The Commissionon Freedom of Speech of the Speech CommunicationAssociation U S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO. DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG. MATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN IONS STt TED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EOU CATION POSITION OR POLICY Editor, Thomas L. Tedford Professor of Dram- and Speech University of North Carolinaat Greensboro PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS COPY -. lk RIGHTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED Speech Communication Association BY O Speech Communicatior Static'. Hilton Hotel *. New York. N.Y. 10001 Association TO ERIC AND ORGANIZATIONS OPERATING 0 1973 UNDER AGREEMENTS WITH THE US OFFICE OF EDUCATION FURTHER REPRODUCTION .19 OUTSIDE THE ERIC SYSTEM REOUIRES PER MISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNER 4. TABLE OF CONTENTS TEACHING :IEE AND RESPONSIBLE SPEECH:A PHILOSOPHICAL VIEW Wayne C. Minnick 1 TOWARD A MORE REALISTIC VIEW OF THEJUDICIAL PROCESS IN RELATION TO FREEDOMOF SPEECH Ruth McGaffey 8 FREE SPEECH IN ANCIENT ATHENS Halford Ryan 20 ACLU LIMITATIONS ON FREE SPEECH:THE CASE OF ELIZABETH FLYNN J. W. Patterson 31 FREE SPEECH: THE PHILOSOPHICALPOLES Cal M. Logue 40 PATRIOTS VS. DISSENTERS: THE RHETORICOF INTIMIDATION IN INDIANA DURING THE FIRSTWORLD WAR Clark Kimball 49 THE INFLUENCE OF A COURSE IN ETHICSAND FREE SPEECH IN CHANGING STUDENTATTITUDES Fred P. Hilpert, Jr 66 SOME HISTORICAL ESSENTIALS OF TEACHINGFREEDOM OF SPEECH John Lee Jellicorse 76 THE SPEECH COMMUNICATIONCLASSROOM AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: TWO VIEWS I. TOWARD A LATITUDE OF SOCIALRESPONSIBILITY Jerry Hendrix 85 II. FREEDOM OF SPEECH, COMMITMENTSAND TEACHING PUBLIC SPEAKING Theodore Otto Windt, Jr. 88 THE SUPREME COURT AND THE FIRSTAMENDMENT: 1971-1972 William A. Linsley 92 FREEDOM OF SPEECH BIBLIOGRAPHY: JULY1971-JUNE 1972 ARTICLES, BOOKS, AND COURT DECISIONS Haig A. Bosmajian 115 Acknowledgments The Editor wishes to express his appreciation to the members of the Speech Communication Association who served as editorial consultants for the Free Speech Yearbook: 1972.Particular gratitude is expressed to Alvin Goldberg, Franklyn Haiman, Alton Barbour, Richard Johannesen, Haig Bosmajian. Robert M. O'Neil, Nancy McDermid, and L. Dean Fadely. New Editor for 1973 The new editor of the Free Speech Yearbook is Alton Barbour, Department of Speech Communication, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado 80210. Those who wish to submit manuscripts to be considered for use in the 1973 Yearbook should send three copies as soon as possible to Professor Barbour. The Newsletter The Commission on Freedom of Speech publishes its newsletter, Free Speech, each quarter of the academic year. News concerning freedom of speech as well as subscription requests should be sent to the editor, Haig Zosmajian (Department of Speech, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105).After June 1, 1973, the new editor will be Peter Kane, Department of Speech, State University of New York at Brockport, Brockport, N. Y. 14420. Yearbook Volume Numbers The Speech Communicati Association began publication of the Free Speech Yearbook in 1970. Volumes are numbered from that date, with the 1970 Yearbook being Volume I, the 197! Yearbook being Volume H, and the present publication being Volume III.From 1962 through 1969 the Committee (now Commission) on Freedom of Speech printed a limited number of yearbooks in mimeograph form. Back issues of the mimeo- graphed yearbooks are not feadily available; however, libraries can make arrangements for photocopies with the Speech Communication Association's New York office. TEACHING FREE AND RESPONSIBLESPEECH: A PHILOSOPHICAL VIEW Wayne C. Minnick Professor of Communication andAssociate Dean of Humanities Florida State University Few people would deny that thereare legitimate limitations on freedomof speech; but while legal mindscautiously formulate tests eat willjustify curtailing free speech, the general public, if opinion polls are an accurate index,is inclined to restrict speech impulsively. In 1o0, a poll of high school students, conductedby Purdue University, indicated that 60per cent believed that police and other should have the power to groups censor books and movies, 63 per cent believedthat com- munists ought not to be allowed to speak on radio, and 25 per cent believedthat the government should not permitsome people to make public speeches 1970 the Columbia Broadcasting at all.' Early in System conducted a telephonesurvey in which respondents were asked, "Doyou think everyone should have the rightto criticize the government, even if the criticism is damaging to our national interests?" Only 42per cent of the persons contacted favored that right.2Hazel Erskii.e, after making survey of public opinion poll quest a ons relating to free speech for the period 1936to 1970, came to the followingconclusion:'Acceptance of free speech for any kind of radical appears to be at a new low for the past three decades. Before1950 a maxi- mum of 49 per cent would have allowedan extremist to speak freely. During the 1950's permissiveness towardradicals never climbed above 29per cent. Since 1960 only 2 in 10 would accord freeexpression to any extreme point of view."3 Such evidence indicates that toleranceof free expression in others is innate tendency; it is learned. not an if we take it for granted thattolerance for freedom of expression has to be cultivated, dowe have a right and/or an obligationto try to inculcate attitudes favorable to freedomof expression in the schools?The purpose of this paper will be to examinethe philosophical implications of answer to that question. an affirmative In our schools and colleges we deal with immature and plastic minds;conse- quently, we have a strong responsibilityto justify what we do to those minds. To like B. F. Skinner there is men no problem. Skinner thinks human behavioris always controlled and manipulated, and he argues that if good men donot manipulate be- havior to good ends, badmen will manipulate it to bad ends. Here isa short state- ment from one of Skinner'sessays: -2- We cannot make wise decisions if we continue to pretend that human behavior is not controlled..../It is a/ dangerous notion ... that most people follow de mocratic principles of conduct "because they want to ...." Although it is tempting to assume it is human nature to believe in democratic principles, we must not overlook the "cultural engineering" which produced and continues to main- tain democratic principles.If we neglect the conditions which produce democratic behavior, it is useless to try to maintain a democratic form of government. 4 It seems evident, then, that Skinner would support conditioning students to hold favorable attitudes toward freedom of expression because freedom of expression is necessary to support democratic government. Nor is Skinner alone in this view. Most educators who have, in the past four or five decades, compiled lists of general ob- jectives of education generally agree that such pragmatic objectives as "civic responsibility" are justified. For the sake of argument let's assume that teaching freedom of expression is defensible if it leads to good ends. We must next inquire what are the good ends it supposedly insures. The social utility theorists, like John Milton, John Stuart Mill, and a large number of apologists who have followed in their footsteps, 6 emphasize at least three desirable social outcomes from the tolerance of free expression.First, the quality of political discussion is said to be enhanced by an atmosphere of open discussion.Democratic political decisions are supposed to rest upon reason and truth, and the only way we can assure public access to reason and truth is through unrestrained expression of ideas.If citizens are denied access to certain kinds of int -mation and opinions, their judgments are distorted. As Alexander Meiklejohn puts it,"It is that mutilation of the thinking process of the community against
Recommended publications
  • German Hegemony and the Socialist International's Place in Interwar

    German Hegemony and the Socialist International's Place in Interwar

    02_EHQ 31/1 articles 30/11/00 1:53 pm Page 101 William Lee Blackwood German Hegemony and the Socialist International’s Place in Interwar European Diplomacy When the guns fell silent on the western front in November 1918, socialism was about to become a governing force throughout Europe. Just six months later, a Czech socialist could marvel at the convocation of an international socialist conference on post- war reconstruction in a Swiss spa, where, across the lake, stood buildings occupied by now-exiled members of the deposed Habsburg ruling class. In May 1923, as Europe’s socialist parties met in Hamburg, Germany, finally to put an end to the war-induced fracturing within their ranks by launching a new organization, the Labour and Socialist International (LSI), the German Communist Party’s main daily published a pull-out flier for posting on factory walls. Bearing the sarcastic title the International of Ministers, it presented to workers a list of forty-one socialists and the national offices held by them in Germany, Austria, Czechoslovakia, Belgium, Poland, France, Sweden, and Denmark. Commenting on the activities of the LSI, in Paris a Russian Menshevik émigré turned prominent left-wing pundit scoffed at the new International’s executive body, which he sarcastically dubbed ‘the International Socialist Cabinet’, since ‘all of its members were ministers, ex-ministers, or prospec- tive ministers of State’.1 Whether one accepted or rejected its new status, socialism’s virtually overnight transformation from an outsider to a consummate insider at the end of Europe’s first total war provided the most striking measure of the quantum leap into what can aptly be described as Europe’s ‘social democratic moment’.2 Moreover, unlike the period after Europe’s second total war, when many of socialism’s basic postulates became permanently embedded in the post-1945 social-welfare-state con- European History Quarterly Copyright © 2001 SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, Vol.
  • Governance in Decentralized Networks

    Governance in Decentralized Networks

    Governance in decentralized networks Risto Karjalainen* May 21, 2020 Abstract. Effective, legitimate and transparent governance is paramount for the long-term viability of decentralized networks. If the aim is to design such a governance model, it is useful to be aware of the history of decision making paradigms and the relevant previous research. Towards such ends, this paper is a survey of different governance models, the thinking behind such models, and new tools and structures which are made possible by decentralized blockchain technology. Governance mechanisms in the wider civil society are reviewed, including structures and processes in private and non-profit governance, open-source development, and self-managed organisations. The alternative ways to aggregate preferences, resolve conflicts, and manage resources in the decentralized space are explored, including the possibility of encoding governance rules as automatically executed computer programs where humans or other entities interact via a protocol. Keywords: Blockchain technology, decentralization, decentralized autonomous organizations, distributed ledger technology, governance, peer-to-peer networks, smart contracts. 1. Introduction This paper is a survey of governance models in decentralized networks, and specifically in networks which make use of blockchain technology. There are good reasons why governance in decentralized networks is a topic of considerable interest at present. Some of these reasons are ideological. We live in an era where detailed information about private individuals is being collected and traded, in many cases without the knowledge or consent of the individuals involved. Decentralized technology is seen as a tool which can help protect people against invasions of privacy. Decentralization can also be viewed as a reaction against the overreach by state and industry.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Democratic Education in The

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Democratic Education in The

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Democratic Education in the Works of Plato A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Richard A. Barrett Committee in charge: Professor Tracy B. Strong, Chair Professor Page duBois Professor Fonna Forman Professor Marcel Hénaff Professor Gerry Mackie 2014 Copyright Richard A. Barrett, 2014 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Richard A. Barrett is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Chair UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2014 iii DEDICATION To those who have shared conversations about our world with me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...…iii Dedication……………………………………………………………………………..iv Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………....v Vita…………………………………………………………………………………....vii Abstract of the Dissertation.………………………………………………………....viii Introduction: Plato and the Problem of Democratic Education ..................................... 1 Chapter 1 Reading Plato: Plato and Xenophon as Teachers and Poets ............. 7 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Comparison of Apologies ................................................................................ 8 1.3 Plato on the Relationship of Philosophy,
  • 13 Socrates' Critique of Democracy by Eva Melinkova

    13 Socrates' Critique of Democracy by Eva Melinkova

    - - 13 13 Socrates’ Critique of Democracy by Eva Melinkova Democracy is a political system that grants its citizens certain personal and political rights. Personal rights are represented by institutionalized freedoms, such as freedom of speech, expression, and assembly; political rights are represented by citizens’ power to choose their own rulers and therefore determine the course of public affairs. In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates identifies democracy as one of the most unjust political regimes. He describes four types of unjust political regimes: timocracy as an honor-driven society; oligarchy as a society driven by the desire for wealth; democracy as a society in which absolute freedom becomes the paramount value; and tyranny as a society ruled by the unrestricted, unlawful desires of one individual. Socrates identifies timocracy as the closest to the ideal political system, i.e. aristocracy (literally, rule by the best). The other regimes descend in value as listed. Socrates’ low estimation of democracy is based on four inherent critical flaws of this regime – excessive freedom, hostility to authority, protection of privacy, and artificial egalitarianism. Socrates maintains that these very flaws will result in the inevitable transformation of democracy to tyranny. Using the flaws and the nature of people within the democratic system, Socrates illustrates the occurrence of the transformation. Although Socrates’ theories and examples appear logical and compelling, there are positive aspects of democracy which must be explored. The following discussion elaborate Socrates’ view of democracy and its - - 14 14 Janua Sophia transformation to tyranny. However, the conclusion will emphasize the positive aspects of democracy.
  • How Propaganda Works How Works

    How Propaganda Works How Works

    HOW PROPAGANDA WORKS HOW WORKS PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS JASON STANLEY Princeton Oxford Copyright © 2015 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu Jacket design by Chris Ferrante Excerpts from Victor Kemperer, The Language of the Third Reich: LTI, Lingua Tertii Imperii, translated by Martin Brady © Reclam Verlag Leipzig, 1975. Used by permission of Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing PLC. All Rights Reserved ISBN 978– 0– 691– 16442– 7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2014955002 British Library Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Sabon Next LT Pro and League Gothic Printed on acid- free paper. ∞ Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This will always remain one of the best jokes of democracy, that it gave its deadly enemies the means by which it was destroyed. — JOSEPH GOEBBELS, REICH MINISTER OF PROPAGANDA, 1933– 45 CONTENTS Preface IX Introduction: The Problem of Propaganda 1 1 Propaganda in the History of Political Thought 27 2 Propaganda Defined 39 3 Propaganda in Liberal Democracy 81 4 Language as a Mechanism of Control 125 5 Ideology 178 6 Political Ideologies 223 7 The Ideology of Elites: A Case Study 269 Conclusion 292 Acknowledgments 295 Notes 305 Bibliography 335 Index 347 PREFACE In August 2013, after almost a decade of teaching at Rutgers University and living in apartments in New York City, my wife Njeri Thande and I moved to a large house in New Haven, Connecticut, to take up positions at Yale University.
  • Plato Is Normally Taken As One of the Founders of Western Political Philosophy, Not at Least with His Republic

    Plato Is Normally Taken As One of the Founders of Western Political Philosophy, Not at Least with His Republic

    Vol. 7, no. 2 (2012) Category: Conference paper Written by Øjvind Larsen Plato is normally taken as one of the founders of Western political philosophy, not at least with his Republic. Here, he constructs a hierarchy of forms of governments, beginning with aristocracy at the top as a critical standard for the other forms of governments, and proceeding through timocracy and oligarchy to democracy and tyranny at the bottom. Following Karl Popper, the paper argues that Plato’s is a totalitarian philosophy that emphasizes the similarities between democracy and tyranny, which it considers to be the two worst forms of government. Plato’s denigration of democracy has dominated the tradition of political philosophy until recent times. This paper, however, shows that political philosophy in fact originates in democracy, especially as developed by the sophists and that philosophy is only a form of sophism with a similar origin in ancient Greek democracy. A discussion of Pericles’ funeral oration is used to show that Pericles presented a democratic political philosophy that can serve as a counterpoint to Plato’s political philosophy in the Republic. I. From democratic praxis to totalitarian political philosophy It is my thesis that political philosophy has its historical origin in democratic praxis and government in the democratic city-state Athens and that it is taken over by sceptics and anti-democratic critics like Plato. The consequence is a break between democratic praxis and antidemocratic political philosophy that has lasted until our day where the global dominance of democracy is taken to force a reconsideration of the inner relation between democracy and political philosophy (Roberts 1994: 6 ff.; Castoriadis 1997: 227).
  • SIGN LAW 101 from the Foundations to the Frontier Copyright 2007, 2008, 2009 Randal R

    SIGN LAW 101 from the Foundations to the Frontier Copyright 2007, 2008, 2009 Randal R

    SIGN LAW 101 From the Foundations to the Frontier copyright 2007, 2008, 2009 Randal R. Morrison A Special Presentation to the League of California Cities September 18, 2009, San Jose CA NEWSLETTER: SIGN REGULATION BULLETIN Quick-read summaries of recent court rulings on sign regulation free – distributed only by email; register at: www.signlaw.com Presenters: Randal R. Morrison Kenneth T. Fong Sabine & Morrison Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney 110 Juniper St. 700 City Hall East PO Box 531518 200 N. Main Street San Diego CA 92153-1518 Los Angeles CA 90012 Tel. 619.234.2864; Fax 619.342.4136 Tel.: 213.978.8064; Fax: 213.978.8214 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Opinions expressed are those of the presenters in their individual and personal capacities and do not necessarily reflect the views of the League of California Cities, or of the presenters’ respective employers, firms or clients. PART ONE: FOUNDATIONS I. CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS A. First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1791) Congress shall make no law respecting [1] the establishment of religion, or [2] prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or [3] abridging the freedom of speech, or [4] of the press; or [5] the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and [6] to petition the Government for redress of grievances. The First Amendment is made applicable to state and local governments, Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939), through the Fourteenth Amendment (1868): All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
  • The Mediator December 26 1919

    The Mediator December 26 1919

    On Sale at "---o-m-a-h-a-'-S-G-r-e-at::-- ' .Al1 News Stands ( and Best Five Cents EDIATOR I \Veekly NewspapeT VOL. XVI. OMAHA, NEBRASKA, DECEMBER 26, 1919. NO.5. THlNGS THAT NEVER. HAPPEN ~ GE~E CLEANING UP ODORS c""''''~''''-"I,-- ..:. BYRNES-.::...-. =",,,~,,,_~_,,, "OPEN S P" LATEST ,IN POLICE AFFAIRS 'NEWSP PER IN CITY I UNDEP.STAND~ More \,}6 uensio1].s Result l;?rom High.. .JUST ONCE ovER· t40 DILL DOLLS Indicates Movement to Curb Pyramid­ . ·J.~5~ -ing of Morals Squad. OR PER fuMe OR \v~ HAIR TONK ing Omaha Wage Scales. \~i0~ '(OURE. A PLAlI" SENSIBLE· lOOI<Ir{6 PITTULL~~'IDE POLICE INSPECTOR: MAN \ ~ . i BUSINESS MEN'S OFFICIAL ORGAN \ • i "Executive Session"'of Council Committee Decides to Clip Wings I Union Labul' I (>nders Expect Movement to Import Large Number of Supt. Ringer-Genel'ally Rotten Conditions Force Three i of Colored Workmen to City-New Factories May Be of Commissioners to Act-Towl Has Few Words. Established-Trade School to Be Opened. 'T'l.e namng of Andl'e"'" Pattullo as 01' to pel~;~ to beconle ,:,uperintendent :,' "Th 0 Sl" II - - " ."=~ - .. e pen lOp, a Slna news- favorable contracts for the services of poll'ce l'nspecto" fOl' tIle CI't:' ''''';11 gen- of police. In fact, were he to take on I hI' b' b th B' tl' b Th L -.' 'P paper, PU IS .en y e usmes" lelr mem ers. e increased cost of erally meet with the approval of the that position, it would blow up a lot I Men's association, recently made its living has naturally been one of the people of Omaha and especially of byof themthingstothatfattenhaveup theirbeenownworkedpocket_out i I' appearance in Omaha and its appear- results of these pjgher wages, but the .
  • Aristotle on Plato's Republic VIII-IX: Politics V. 12, 1316A1-B27

    Aristotle on Plato's Republic VIII-IX: Politics V. 12, 1316A1-B27

    polis, The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 35 (2018) 374-400 brill.com/polis Aristotle on Plato’s Republic VIII-IX: Politics v. 12, 1316a1-b27 Mor Segev Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, FAO 226, Tampa, FL 33620, USA [email protected] Abstract Toward the end of Politics V. 12, Aristotle criticizes Plato’s discussion of political change in Republic VIII-IX. Scholars often reject Aristotle’s criticism, especially because it por- trays Plato’s discussion, allegedly unfairly, as developing a historically testable theory. I argue that Aristotle’s criticism is adequate, and that the seriousness with which he considers Plato’s account of political change as an alternative to his own is both war- ranted and instructive. First, apart from criticizing Plato’s account for its historical inaccuracies, Aristotle also exposes theoretical insufficiencies and internal incon- sistencies within it. Second, Aristotle’s criticisms of historical inaccuracies in Plato’s discussion of political change are not misdirected, since there are reasons to think that Plato does intend that discussion to accord with the historical facts. Keywords Aristotle – Politics – Plato – Republic – political change 1 Introduction Toward the end of Politics V. 12, Aristotle criticizes Plato’s discussion of politi- cal change in Republic VIII-IX. This criticism is often taken to be unjustified or misdirected on several points. In particular, it has been suggested that Aristotle unfairly portrays Plato’s discussion as developing
  • Joe Bean Novel

    Joe Bean Novel

    1 Mark Nichols Joe Bean 2 3 Mark Nichols Joe Bean 4 PROLOGUE Joe Bean walks on stage. He is watched by 1000 eyes. He does not know he is being watched. To him, all the world is not a stage. To him, the walk from here to there appears to be just another walk through the market where he almost always has lunch. It is important you know this. Not that he has lunch in the market, but that he does not know you are watching him. Shhh, it’s a secret. * * * We, the audience, see that what appears to be a yoga studio is actually a set piece and that it sits rickety on a darkened stage. A young actress eyes the Yoga teacher in front and holds her Virabhadrasana, Warrior Pose. The man onstage is very calm. Handsome. Older. And more-than-likely married. She assumes that hunk of gold bling on his finger must be a wedding ring. The actress follows the trickle of sweat dripping down his back as Joe Bean begins to chant and stretch himself out like some sort of yogi/clown, Llama, lamma, pizza rama, Vishnu wish you peaceful manna Yin, Yang, Paddywack Hari Hama This little piggy went to market, Mamma Nam Yo ho, Renge Kio yo, Shivananda, Hopscotch Vegananda, 5 Mark Nichols The yoga class laughs and Joe winks. The audience remains silent. We’re waiting for something else. The young woman feels her heart beating through spandex bra and studies herself in the big mirror. The carefree double- horned-curled-over-ponytail satyr thing she’d been doing with her hair lately was good.
  • The University of Chicago Planning for the Short

    The University of Chicago Planning for the Short

    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PLANNING FOR THE SHORT HAUL: EXPLAINING WARTIME TRADE BETWEEN ENEMIES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY MARIYA GRINBERG CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2019 Copyright © 2019 by Mariya Grinberg All Rights Reserved ii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... VII ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................. VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 EXISTING EXPLANATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3 WARTIME COMMERCIAL POLICY ................................................................................................. 7 THE ARGUMENT......................................................................................................................... 10 SCOPE CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................
  • Civics and General Studies Journal

    Civics and General Studies Journal

    Appointment of Good Governance Minister who is responsible DEMOCRATIC PRACTICES IN for among other things for monitoring overall strategy and CHAPTER TANZANIA implementation of ant-corruption measures. The National Anti- 2 corruption Strategy focuses on the need for transparency and accountability in the government. A direct The concept of democracy democracy gives the voting Democracy is a form of government in which population all citizens have an equal say in the decisions the power that affect their lives. Ideally, this includes Conclusions to; change constitutional equal (and more or less direct) participation Problems in governance occur when a government is not only laws, put forth in proposals, development and passage of corrupt, but when it is also inefficient, unresponsive or secretive. initiatives, legislation into law. Essentially, when a government is ineffectual, it is considered to referendums be corrupt. Corruption is fundamentally caused by low wages, and suggestions It comes from the Greek word demokratía poor incentives structure and inefficient system. It is also caused for laws, give binding orders which is a union of two words demos meaning by the desire for unfair advantage and the knowledge that one to elective common people and kratos which means will not be caught or punished for corrupt behavior. officials, such power. Therefore democracy can simply be as revoking defined as the power of the common people. Corruption is not just about ethics, it is also about how them before the government is set up and managed. Parliament and the end of their elected term. There is no specific, universally accepted parliamentarians must oversee the way government works so that definition of ‘democracy’, but equality corrupt behavior is punishable, and opportunities for corruption and freedom both have been identified as are limited through laws.