BET Protein Inhibitor JQ1 Downregulates Chromatin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Histone Isoform H2A1H Promotes Attainment of Distinct Physiological
Bhattacharya et al. Epigenetics & Chromatin (2017) 10:48 DOI 10.1186/s13072-017-0155-z Epigenetics & Chromatin RESEARCH Open Access Histone isoform H2A1H promotes attainment of distinct physiological states by altering chromatin dynamics Saikat Bhattacharya1,4,6, Divya Reddy1,4, Vinod Jani5†, Nikhil Gadewal3†, Sanket Shah1,4, Raja Reddy2,4, Kakoli Bose2,4, Uddhavesh Sonavane5, Rajendra Joshi5 and Sanjay Gupta1,4* Abstract Background: The distinct functional efects of the replication-dependent histone H2A isoforms have been dem- onstrated; however, the mechanistic basis of the non-redundancy remains unclear. Here, we have investigated the specifc functional contribution of the histone H2A isoform H2A1H, which difers from another isoform H2A2A3 in the identity of only three amino acids. Results: H2A1H exhibits varied expression levels in diferent normal tissues and human cancer cell lines (H2A1C in humans). It also promotes cell proliferation in a context-dependent manner when exogenously overexpressed. To uncover the molecular basis of the non-redundancy, equilibrium unfolding of recombinant H2A1H-H2B dimer was performed. We found that the M51L alteration at the H2A–H2B dimer interface decreases the temperature of melting of H2A1H-H2B by ~ 3 °C as compared to the H2A2A3-H2B dimer. This diference in the dimer stability is also refected in the chromatin dynamics as H2A1H-containing nucleosomes are more stable owing to M51L and K99R substitu- tions. Molecular dynamic simulations suggest that these substitutions increase the number of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions of H2A1H, enabling it to form more stable nucleosomes. Conclusion: We show that the M51L and K99R substitutions, besides altering the stability of histone–histone and histone–DNA complexes, have the most prominent efect on cell proliferation, suggesting that the nucleosome sta- bility is intimately linked with the physiological efects observed. -
Functional Roles of Bromodomain Proteins in Cancer
cancers Review Functional Roles of Bromodomain Proteins in Cancer Samuel P. Boyson 1,2, Cong Gao 3, Kathleen Quinn 2,3, Joseph Boyd 3, Hana Paculova 3 , Seth Frietze 3,4,* and Karen C. Glass 1,2,4,* 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Colchester, VT 05446, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Pharmacology, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA; [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (J.B.); [email protected] (H.P.) 4 University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT 05405, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.F.); [email protected] (K.C.G.) Simple Summary: This review provides an in depth analysis of the role of bromodomain-containing proteins in cancer development. As readers of acetylated lysine on nucleosomal histones, bromod- omain proteins are poised to activate gene expression, and often promote cancer progression. We examined changes in gene expression patterns that are observed in bromodomain-containing proteins and associated with specific cancer types. We also mapped the protein–protein interaction network for the human bromodomain-containing proteins, discuss the cellular roles of these epigenetic regu- lators as part of nine different functional groups, and identify bromodomain-specific mechanisms in cancer development. Lastly, we summarize emerging strategies to target bromodomain proteins in cancer therapy, including those that may be essential for overcoming resistance. Overall, this review provides a timely discussion of the different mechanisms of bromodomain-containing pro- Citation: Boyson, S.P.; Gao, C.; teins in cancer, and an updated assessment of their utility as a therapeutic target for a variety of Quinn, K.; Boyd, J.; Paculova, H.; cancer subtypes. -
Differences for Ectopic Versus Eutopic Cells
556 RBMO VOLUME 39 ISSUE 4 2019 ARTICLE Chemosensitivity and chemoresistance in endometriosis – differences for ectopic versus eutopic cells BIOGRAPHY Andres Salumets is Professor of Reproductive Medicine at the University of Tartu, and Scientific Head at the Competence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia. He has been involved in assisted reproduction for 20 years, first as an embryologist and later as a researcher. His major interests are endometriosis, endometrial biology and implantation. Darja Lavogina1,2,*, Külli Samuel1, Arina Lavrits1,3, Alvin Meltsov1, Deniss Sõritsa1,4,5, Ülle Kadastik6, Maire Peters1,4, Ago Rinken2, Andres Salumets1,4,7, 8 KEY MESSAGE Akt/PKB inhibitor GSK690693, CK2 inhibitor ARC-775, MAPK pathway inhibitor sorafenib, proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, and microtubule-depolymerizing toxin MMAE showed higher cytotoxicity in eutopic cells. In contrast, 10 µmol/l of the anthracycline toxin doxorubicin caused cellular death in ectopic cells more effectively than in eutopic cells, underlining the potential of doxorubicin in endometriosis research. ABSTRACT Research question: Endometriosis is a common gynaecological disease defined by the presence of endometrium-like tissue outside the uterus. This complex disease, often accompanied by severe pain and infertility, causes a significant medical and socioeconomic burden; hence, novel strategies are being sought for the treatment of endometriosis. Here, we set out to explore the cytotoxic effects of a panel of compounds to find toxins with different efficiency in eutopic versus ectopic cells, thus highlighting alterations in the corresponding molecular pathways. Design: The effect on cellular viability of 14 compounds was established in a cohort of paired eutopic and ectopic endometrial stromal cell samples from 11 patients. -
Bromodomain Protein BRDT Directs ΔNp63 Function and Super
Cell Death & Differentiation (2021) 28:2207–2220 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-021-00751-w ARTICLE Bromodomain protein BRDT directs ΔNp63 function and super-enhancer activity in a subset of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas 1 1 2 1 1 2 Xin Wang ● Ana P. Kutschat ● Moyuru Yamada ● Evangelos Prokakis ● Patricia Böttcher ● Koji Tanaka ● 2 3 1,3 Yuichiro Doki ● Feda H. Hamdan ● Steven A. Johnsen Received: 25 August 2020 / Revised: 3 February 2021 / Accepted: 4 February 2021 / Published online: 3 March 2021 © The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access Abstract Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant subtype of esophageal cancer with a particularly high prevalence in certain geographical regions and a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 15–25%. Despite numerous studies characterizing the genetic and transcriptomic landscape of ESCC, there are currently no effective targeted therapies. In this study, we used an unbiased screening approach to uncover novel molecular precision oncology targets for ESCC and identified the bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) family member bromodomain testis-specific protein (BRDT) to be 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: uniquely expressed in a subgroup of ESCC. Experimental studies revealed that BRDT expression promotes migration but is dispensable for cell proliferation. Further mechanistic insight was gained through transcriptome analyses, which revealed that BRDT controls the expression of a subset of ΔNp63 target genes. Epigenome and genome-wide occupancy studies, combined with genome-wide chromatin interaction studies, revealed that BRDT colocalizes and interacts with ΔNp63 to drive a unique transcriptional program and modulate cell phenotype. Our data demonstrate that these genomic regions are enriched for super-enhancers that loop to critical ΔNp63 target genes related to the squamous phenotype such as KRT14, FAT2, and PTHLH. -
Reconstructing Cell Cycle Pseudo Time-Series Via Single-Cell Transcriptome Data—Supplement
School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics Reconstructing Cell Cycle Pseudo Time-Series Via Single-Cell Transcriptome Data—Supplement UT Dallas Author(s): Michael Q. Zhang Rights: CC BY 4.0 (Attribution) ©2017 The Authors Citation: Liu, Zehua, Huazhe Lou, Kaikun Xie, Hao Wang, et al. 2017. "Reconstructing cell cycle pseudo time-series via single-cell transcriptome data." Nature Communications 8, doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00039-z This document is being made freely available by the Eugene McDermott Library of the University of Texas at Dallas with permission of the copyright owner. All rights are reserved under United States copyright law unless specified otherwise. File name: Supplementary Information Description: Supplementary figures, supplementary tables, supplementary notes, supplementary methods and supplementary references. CCNE1 CCNE1 CCNE1 CCNE1 36 40 32 34 32 35 30 32 28 30 30 28 28 26 24 25 Normalized Expression Normalized Expression Normalized Expression Normalized Expression 26 G1 S G2/M G1 S G2/M G1 S G2/M G1 S G2/M Cell Cycle Stage Cell Cycle Stage Cell Cycle Stage Cell Cycle Stage CCNE1 CCNE1 CCNE1 CCNE1 40 32 40 40 35 30 38 30 30 28 36 25 26 20 20 34 Normalized Expression Normalized Expression Normalized Expression 24 Normalized Expression G1 S G2/M G1 S G2/M G1 S G2/M G1 S G2/M Cell Cycle Stage Cell Cycle Stage Cell Cycle Stage Cell Cycle Stage Supplementary Figure 1 | High stochasticity of single-cell gene expression means, as demonstrated by relative expression levels of gene Ccne1 using the mESC-SMARTer data. For every panel, 20 sample cells were randomly selected for each of the three stages, followed by plotting the mean expression levels at each stage. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,799,528 B2 Civin Et Al
US007799528B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,799,528 B2 Civin et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 21, 2010 (54) THERAPEUTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC Al-Hajj et al., “Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast can APPLICATIONS OF GENES cer cells.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100(7):3983-3988 (2003). DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED IN Bhatia et al., “A newly discovered class of human hematopoietic cells LYMPHO-HEMATOPOETC STEM CELLS with SCID-repopulating activity.” Nat. Med. 4(9)1038-45 (1998). (75) Inventors: Curt I. Civin, Baltimore, MD (US); Bonnet, D., “Normal and leukemic CD35-negative human Robert W. Georgantas, III, Towson, hematopoletic stem cells.” Rev. Clin. Exp. Hematol. 5:42-61 (2001). Cambot et al., “Human Immune Associated Nucleotide 1: a member MD (US) of a new guanosine triphosphatase family expressed in resting T and (73) Assignee: The Johns Hopkins University, B cells.” Blood, 99(9):3293-3301 (2002). Baltimore, MD (US) Chen et al., “Kruppel-like Factor 4 (Gut-enriched Kruppel-like Fac tor) Inhibits Cell Proliferation by Blocking G1/S Progression of the *) NotOt1Ce: Subjubject to anyy d1Sclaimer,disclai theh term off thisthi Cell Cycle.” J. Biol. Chem., 276(32):30423-30428 (2001). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Chen et al., “Transcriptional profiling of Kurppel-like factor 4 reveals U.S.C. 154(b) by 168 days. a function in cell cycle regulation and epithelial differentiation.” J. Mol. Biol. 326(3):665-677 (2003). (21) Appl. No.: 11/199.665 Civin et al., “Highly purified CD34-positive cells reconstitute (22) Filed: Aug. 9, 2005 hematopoiesis,” J. -
Overcoming BET Inhibitor Resistance in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 22, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2437 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Cooper and Patel, et al. Page 1 Overcoming BET inhibitor resistance in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors Jonathan M. Cooper1,6, Amish J. Patel1,2,6, Zhiguo Chen1,7, Chung-Ping Liao1,7, Kun Chen1,7, Juan Mo1, Yong Wang1, Lu Q. Le1,3,4,5 1Department of Dermatology, 2Cancer Biology Graduate Program, 3Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4UTSW Comprehensive Neurofibromatosis Clinic, 5Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9133, USA 6Co-first authors. 7These authors contributed equally. Author for correspondence: Lu Q. Le, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Dermatology Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center UT Southwestern Medical Center Phone: (214) 648-5781 Fax: (214) 648-5553 E-mail: [email protected] Running Title: Cancer cell sensitivity and resistance to BET inhibitors Keywords: Neurofibromatosis Type1, NF1, Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor, MPNST, Neurofibrosarcomas, JQ1, BRD4 levels, BET inhibitor sensitivity and resistance, BET Bromodomain, PROTAC, ARV771 The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists. Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 26, 2021. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 22, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2437 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Cooper and Patel, et al. Page 2 Statement of Translational Relevance Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive sarcomas with no effective therapies. -
Triazolobenzodiazepines and -Triazepines As Protein Interaction Inhibitors Targeting Bromodomains of the BET Family
Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Triazolobenzodiazepines and -triazepines as Protein Interaction Inhibitors Targeting Bromodomains of the BET Family Matthias Alfons Wrobel aus Weiden i.d.OPf. 2013 Erklärung Diese Dissertation wurde im Sinne von § 7 der Promotionsordnung vom 28. November 2011 von Herrn Prof. Dr. Franz Bracher betreut. Eidesstattliche Versicherung Diese Dissertation wurde eigenständig und ohne unerlaubte Hilfe erarbeitet. München, 09.12.2013 Matthias Wrobel Dissertation eingereicht am 10.12.2013 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Franz Bracher 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Stefan Knapp Mündliche Prüfung am 21.01.2014 This dissertation was carried out in close collaboration with the Structural Genomics Consortium of the University of Oxford. Prof. Dr. Stefan Knapp Dr. Panagis Filippakopoulos Screening via DSF / ITC / Co-crystallization …für Caro …für meine Familie Acknowledgements I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Franz Bracher for giving me the possibility to work on this interesting topic, the helpful advices in meetings, always having a sympathetic ear for all kind of affairs and his support during the time of my PhD Thesis. I would also like to thank all the members of the Board of Examiners. In gratitude for the opportunity to visit his group at the University of Oxford (UK) and his considerable commitment for our collaboration, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Stefan Knapp. Special thanks goes to Dr. Panagis Filippakopoulos for his supervision during my stays at the SGC and his patience and support in uncountable discussions about co-crystallization, structure optimization and critical appraisal of screening results. -
Pharmacological Unmasking Microarray Approach-Based Discovery of Novel DNA Methylation Markers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Oncology & Hematology http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2012.27.6.594 • J Korean Med Sci 2012; 27: 594-604 Pharmacological Unmasking Microarray Approach-Based Discovery of Novel DNA Methylation Markers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Namhee Jung1, Jae Kyung Won2, DNA methylation is one of the main epigenetic mechanisms and hypermethylation of CpG Baek-Hui Kim3, Kyung Suk Suh4, islands at tumor suppressor genes switches off these genes. To find novel DNA methylation Ja-June Jang2, and Gyeong Hoon Kang1,2 markers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we performed pharmacological unmasking (treatment with 5-aza-2´-deoxycytidine or trichostatin A) followed by microarray analysis 1Laboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, 2Departments of Pathology, 3General in HCC cell lines. Of the 239 promoter CpG island loci hypermethylated in HCC cell lines Surgery, Seoul National University College of (as revealed by methylation-specific PCR), 221 loci were found to be hypermethylated in Medicine, Seoul; 4Department of Pathology, Korea HCC or nonneoplastic liver tissues. Thirty-three loci showed a 20% higher methylation University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea frequency in tumors than in adjacent nonneoplastic tissues. Correlation of individual Received: 21 November 2011 cancer-related methylation markers with clinicopathological features of HCC patients Accepted: 23 February 2012 (n = 95) revealed that the number of hypermethylated genes in HCC tumors was higher in older than in younger patients. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis revealed that Address for Correspondence: the HIST1H2AE methylation status is closely correlated with the patient’s overall survival Gyeong Hoon Kang, MD Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of (P = 0.022 and P = 0.010, respectively). -
BET Bromodomain Protein Inhibition Is a Therapeutic Option for Medulloblastoma
www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, November, Vol.4, No 11 BET bromodomain protein inhibition is a therapeutic option for medulloblastoma Anton Henssen1, Theresa Thor2,4, Andrea Odersky 1, Lukas Heukamp6, Nicolai El- Hindy7, Anneleen Beckers8, Frank Speleman8, Kristina Althoff1, Simon Schäfers1, Alexander Schramm1, Ulrich Sure7, Gudrun Fleischhack1, Angelika Eggert9, Johannes H. Schulte1,5 1 Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children`s Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany 2 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany 3 Translational Neuro-Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany 4 German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany 5 Centre for Medical Biotechnology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany 6 Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany 7 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Essen, Essen, Germany 8 Center of Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium 9 Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany Correspondence to: Johannes H. Schulte, email: [email protected] Keywords: BET bromodomains, BRD4, MYC, JQ1, pediatric brain tumors, targeted therapy Received: October 23, 2013 Accepted: October 25, 2013 Published: October 27, 2013 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT: Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor of childhood, and represents a significant clinical challenge in pediatric oncology, since overall survival currently remains under 70%. Patients with tumors overexpressing MYC or harboring a MYC oncogene amplification have an extremely poor prognosis. Pharmacologically inhibiting MYC expression may, thus, have clinical utility given its pathogenetic role in medulloblastoma. -
Macrophage Inflammatory Responses BET Inhibitor JQ1 Impair Mouse
BET Protein Function Is Required for Inflammation: Brd2 Genetic Disruption and BET Inhibitor JQ1 Impair Mouse Macrophage Inflammatory Responses This information is current as of October 4, 2021. Anna C. Belkina, Barbara S. Nikolajczyk and Gerald V. Denis J Immunol 2013; 190:3670-3678; Prepublished online 18 February 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202838 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/7/3670 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/02/19/jimmunol.120283 Material 8.DC1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 51 articles, 19 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/7/3670.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on October 4, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology BET Protein Function Is Required for Inflammation: Brd2 Genetic Disruption and BET Inhibitor JQ1 Impair Mouse Macrophage Inflammatory Responses Anna C. -
A Phase IB Dose Exploration Trial with MK-8628, a Small
Official Protocol Title: A Phase IB Dose Exploration Trial with MK-8628, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Proteins, in Subjects with Selected Advanced Solid Tumors NCT number: NCT02698176 Document Date: 21-Nov-2016 Product: MK-8628 1 Protocol/Amendment No.: 006-02 THIS PROTOCOL AMENDMENT AND ALL OF THE INFORMATION RELATING TO IT ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., A SUBSIDIARY OF MERCK & CO., INC., WHITEHOUSE STATION, NJ, U.S.A. SPONSOR: Oncoethix GmbH, a wholly owned subsidiary of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (hereafter referred to as the Sponsor or Merck) Weystrasse 20 6000 Lucerne Switzerland Protocol-specific Sponsor Contact information can be found in the Investigator Trial File Binder (or equivalent). TITLE: A Phase IB Dose Exploration Trial with MK-8628, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Proteins, in Subjects with Selected Advanced Solid Tumors IND NUMBER: 123,715 EudraCT NUMBER: 2015-005488-18 MK-8628-006-02 Final Protocol 21-Nov-2016 Confidential Product: MK-8628 2 Protocol/Amendment No.: 006-02 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF CHANGES................................................................................................ 11 1.0 TRIAL SUMMARY.................................................................................................. 13 2.0 TRIAL DESIGN........................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Trial Design ..........................................................................................................