DOCSLIB.ORG

COUNTRIES MAPS and METADATA REPORT Deliverable 3.1.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SIMONA D 3.1.1 COUNTRIES MAPS AND METADATA REPORT Deliverable 3.1.1 1 Programme co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA, ENI) SIMONA D 3.1.1 Project title Sediment-quality Information, Monitoring and Assessment System to support transnational cooperation for joint Danube Basin water management Acronym SIMONA Project duration 1st June 2018 to 1st May 2021, 36 months Date of preparation 30/04/2019 Compiled by: Veronica Alexe, Anca-Marina Vijdea Authors (in alphabetical order): Veronica Alexe (IGR), Jasminka Alijagić (GEOZS), Albert Baltres (IGR), Sonja Cerar (GEOZS), Gheorghe Damian (TUCN), Neda Dević (GSM), Katalin Mária Dudás (NAIC), Petyo Filipov (GI-BAS), Edith Haslinger (AIT), Zuzana Hiklová (SWME), Atanas Hikov (GI-BAS), Pavel Hucko (WRI-VUVH), Gheorghe Iepure (TUCN), Danijel Ivanišević (HGI-CGS), Ana Čaić Janković (HGI-CGS), Gyozo Jordan (SZIE), Paul Kinner (AIT), Volodymyr Klos (UGC), Jozef Kordík (SGIDS), Aleksandra Kovacevic (JUVS), Zsófia Kovács (OVF), Tanja Knoll (GBA), Zlatka Milakovska (GI-BAS), Ivan Mišur (HGI-CGS), Tatjana Mitrović (UB-FMG), Daniel Nasui (TUCN), Igor Nicoară (IGS-ASM), Jarmila Nováková (SGIDS), Irena Peytcheva (GI-BAS), Sebastian Pfleiderer (GBA), Vladimír Roško (WRI-VUVH), Robert Šajn (GEOZS), Manfred Sengl (LfU), Ajka Šorša (HGI-CGS), Igor Stríček (SGIDS), Zsolt Szakacs (TUCN), Ľudmila Tokarčíková (SGIDS), Milena Vetseva (GI-BAS), Jelena Vicanovic (JUVS), Anca- Marina Vijdea (IGR), Dragica Vulić (JCI). Responsible(s) of the deliverable: Anca-Marina Vijdea (IGR) Co-responsible(s) of the deliverable: Gyozo Jordan (SZIE) 2 Programme co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA, ENI) SIMONA D 3.1.1 Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. SIMONA COUNTRIES’ ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 11 I. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................................... 13 I.1. National or/and European legislation ................................................................................................. 13 I.2. List of hazardous substances in waters, soils, sediments and biota .......................... 38 I.3. Quality objectives for hazardous substances ................................................................................ 68 I.4. Listing of analytical standards ................................................................................................................... 69 I.5. List of chronic or acute toxicity tests and biota .......................................................................... 69 I.6. List of national and international guides of techniques ...................................................... 70 I.7. Recommended remedy measures ........................................................................................................ 71 II. PRACTICES, EXPERIENCES .................................................................................................................................. 73 II.1. Significant projects ............................................................................................................................................ 73 II.2. Significant papers ............................................................................................................................................... 75 II.3. Monitoring sites .................................................................................................................................................... 77 II.4. Polluters data availability ............................................................................................................................. 93 II.5. Monitoring problems ....................................................................................................................................... 94 III. INVENTORY OF SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES ................................................................................. 96 III.1. Water ...........................................................................................................................................................................96 III.1.1. Design of sampling strategy ........................................................................................................... 96 III.1.2. Parameters of water quality/quantity measured in situ .......................................... 96 III.1.3. Instruments for in situ measurements ................................................................................... 98 III.1.4. Methodology for in situ measurements ................................................................................ 98 III.1.5. Tools for collecting samples for laboratory measurements ................................. 98 III.1.6. Sample preservation .............................................................................................................................. 98 III.1.7. Methodology for sample collecting .......................................................................................... 99 III.2. Sediments .............................................................................................................................................................100 III.2.1. Type of sampled/measured sediment .................................................................................100 III.2.2. Design of sampling strategy ........................................................................................................100 III.2.3. Parameters of sediment quality/quantity measured in situ ............................. 101 3 Programme co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA, ENI) SIMONA D 3.1.1 III.2.4. Sampling devices for in situ measurements ..................................................................101 III.2.5. Methodology for in situ measurements .............................................................................101 III.2.6. Tools for collecting samples for laboratory measurements .............................. 101 III.2.7. Methodology of sample collecting for laboratory measurements .............. 102 III.2.8. Transport methodology of samples for laboratory measurements ............ 104 III.2.9. Sample archiving ...................................................................................................................................104 III.3. Biota ..........................................................................................................................................................................104 III.3.1. Type of biota ..............................................................................................................................................104 III.3.2. Design of sampling strategy ........................................................................................................105 III.3.3. Parameters of biota quality/quantity measured in situ ........................................ 106 III.3.4. Instruments for in situ measurements ................................................................................106 III.3.5. Methodology for in situ measurements .............................................................................106 III.3.6. Tools for collecting samples for laboratory measurements .............................. 107 III.3.7. Methodology of sample collecting for laboratory measurements .............. 107 III.3.8. Transport methodology of samples for laboratory measurements ............ 108 III.3.9. Sample archiving ...................................................................................................................................108 III.4. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................109 IV. INVENTORY OF LABORATORY METHODOLOGIES ......................................................................120 IV.1. Mechanical preparation of samples ...............................................................................................120 IV.2. Chemicals .............................................................................................................................................................121 IV.2.1. Procedure for organic matter .....................................................................................................123 IV.2.2. ICP-MS, ICP-AES systems................................................................................................................124 IV.2.3. AAS systems ..............................................................................................................................................125 IV.2.4. XRF ....................................................................................................................................................................125 IV.2.5. DC-arc - AES ..............................................................................................................................................126 IV.2.6. Radionuclides ..........................................................................................................................................126
Recommended publications
  • Addendum to the Ninth Annual Report on Federal Agency Use Of

    Addendum to the Ninth Annual Report on Federal Agency Use Of

    Addendum to the Ninth Annual Report on Federal Agency Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and Conformity Assessment Table of Contents for Supplemental Appendices Note: Appendices A, B, and C are contained in the full report to the Office of Management and Budget Appendix D – Individual, Unabridged Departmental Reports........................................D­1 Department of Agriculture........................................................................................................... D­1 Department of Commerce............................................................................................................ D­6 Department of Defense .............................................................................................................. D­25 Department of Energy................................................................................................................ D­45 Department of Health and Human Services ................................................................................ D­52 Department of Homeland Security............................................................................................. D­75 Department of Housing and Urban Development ....................................................................... D­80 Department of the Interior.......................................................................................................... D­85 Department of Justice .............................................................................................................

  • Instrumentation and Control Qualification Standard

    Instrumentation and Control Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1162-2013 June 2013 Reference Guide The Functional Area Qualification Standard References Guides are developed to assist operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff in the acquisition of technical competence and qualification within the Technical Qualification Program (TQP). Please direct your questions or comments related to this document to the Office of Leadership and Career Management, TQP Manager, NNSA Albuquerque Complex. This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... v VIDEOS ........................................................................................................................................... v ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... vii PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1 PREFACE .....................................................................................................................................
  • Highlights 2019 EN

    Highlights 2019 EN

    Products Solutions Services Highlights 2019 Measurement technology, services and solutions for process automation Liquiphant, now with Heartbeat Technology Highlights 2019 Highlights Highlights 2019 3 Contents 4 Product highlights for 2019 Temperature 5 One partner for everything – and the world 40 Temperature measurement of process automation is complete 42 Temperature measurement – thermometers 6 Simply reliable – plant reliability 43 Temperature measurement – self-calibration 8 Standardized device concepts 44 Temperature measurement – resistance 10 Heartbeat Technology thermometers 11 Heartbeat Technology for level measurement 45 Temperature measurement – transmitters 12 Heartbeat Technology for flow measurement 46 Measuring temperature profiles with 14 Industry 4.0 iTHERM MultiSens 48 Temperature measurement – temperature transmit- ters with optional Bluetooth control Field instrumentation 49 Temperature measurement – secondary containment Level 16 Level measurement Analysis 18 Optimum device design for fill level measurement- 50 Liquid analysis technology – now also available in digital format 52 Liquid analysis – pH 19 113 GHz + Your Wavelength 53 Liquid analysis – transmitters 20 SmartBlue App 54 Liquid analysis – disinfection 21 Radartechnology – in a new compact size 55 Liquid analysis – transmitters 22 Capacitive level measurement – limit switch for pow- 56 Liquid analysis – turbidity dery and fine-grained bulk solids 57 Liquid analysis – total phosphorous and phosphate 23 Successful, reliable and easy to use 24 Reliable, efficient and compact System components 58 System components 60 Easy data integration on DIN rail Pressure 26 Pressure measurement 28 With us as your partner, you have access to Automation solutions all aspects of pressure measurement technology 30 Pressure measurement – maximum precision Automation with maximum safety and reliability 62 Intelligent process automation 31 TempC – new, unique diaphragm seal 64 Cooling circuit disinfection and the 42nd regulation of the German Emissions Control Act (42.
  • Joonas Kahiluoto

    Joonas Kahiluoto

    Joonas Kahiluoto Kenttäkäyttöisen veden sameuden mittauksen automatisointi jatkuvatoi- misella mittaustuloksen laadunvarmistustekniikalla Kemian, bio- ja materiaalitekniikan maisteriohjelma Pääaine: Prosessitekniikka Diplomityö, joka on jätetty opinnäytteenä tarkastettavaksi diplomi-insinöörin tut- kintoa varten Espoossa 15.9.2017. Valvoja Professori Sirkka-Liisa Jämsä-Jounela Ohjaaja Filosofian tohtori, dosentti Teemu Näykki Aalto-yliopisto, PL 11000, 00076 AALTO www.aalto.fi Diplomityön tiivistelmä Tekijä Joonas Kahiluoto Työn nimi Kenttäkäyttöisen veden sameuden mittauksen automatisointi jatkuvatoimi- sella mittaustuloksen laadunvarmistustekniikalla Laitos Kemian tekniikan ja metallurgian laitos Pääaine Prosessitekniikka Työn valvoja Sirkka-Liisa Jämsä-Jounela Työn ohjaaja(t)/Työn tarkastaja(t) Teemu Näykki Päivämäärä 15.9.2017 Sivumäärä 69+15 Kieli Suomi Tiivistelmä Tarve ympäristön tilan seurannalle ja luotettavan tiedon tuottamiselle nousee muuttu- vassa maailmassa entistä tärkeämpään asemaan. Teknologian kehittymisen myötä uu- det ajallisesti ja alueellisesti kattavammat seurantamenetelmät yleistyvät, mutta riittä- mätön tieto uusien menetelmien luotettavuudesta hidastaa niiden käyttöönottoa. Tässä työssä kehitettiin konsepti jatkuvatoimisten mittausten luotettavaan suorittami- seen. Konseptia testattiin suunnittelemalla ja rakentamalla automaattinen veden sa- meuden mittausasema ja soveltamalla Nordtestin teknistä raporttia 537 mittausepä- varmuuden reaaliaikaiseen arviointiin aseman mittaustuloksista. Kehitettyä konseptia voidaan
  • IDDE) Program

    IDDE) Program

    City of Cambridge Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program June 30, 2021 Prepared for: City of Cambridge, MA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION (IDDE) PROGRAM Table of Contents Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................... iv Glossary ................................................................................................................................................................ vi 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 MS4 Program ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Illicit Discharges ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges ......................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Receiving Waters and Impairments ............................................................................................................... 2 1.5 IDDE Program Goals, Framework, and Timeline ............................................................................................ 3 1.6 Work Completed
  • Technical Provisions

    Technical Provisions

    NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR Interstate 93 Exit 4A Project DERRY-LONDONDERRY, NH – NHDOT Project Number: 13065 Federal Project Number IM-0931(201) Volume II – Book 2 Technical Provisions NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 7 Hazen Drive Concord, NH 03302 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 483 Concord, NH 03302-0483 August 6, 2020 ADDENDUM #4 NHDOT Interstate 93 Exit 4A Project 13065 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................ 1 Project Scope ................................................................................................................................ 1 I-93 Interchange 4A .................................................................................................................... 22 Bridges ........................................................................................................................................ 33 Roadway ..................................................................................................................................... 33 Other Items .................................................................................................................................. 44 2. PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ADMINISTRATION ....................................................
  • Cost Water Quality Monitoring Devices

    Cost Water Quality Monitoring Devices

    AFFORDABLE WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS: A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION OF LOW- COST WATER QUALITY MONITORING DEVICES by Christopher Daniel Kelley A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland February 2018 Abstract Access to adequate supplies of potable water is a key driver of human health. Physical and chemical treatment processes are frequently necessary to make water safe to drink. Monitoring of water before, during, and after treatment is an essential component of the provision of potable water, and most aspects of water quality monitoring require electronic devices to augment human senses. Every nation sets rules governing the treatment and monitoring of drinking water, in an attempt to continuously ensure potability of drinking water supplies. Presently, however, the regulations governing the design of common electronic devices for water quality monitoring are developed and published by just two organizations – the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The implications of this regulatory situation on drinking water quality monitoring, particularly in low-resource settings, are largely (perhaps completely) unaddressed in existing literature. Turbidity, which may be summarized as cloudiness in a body of liquid due to the scattering of light by particles suspended in that body, is internationally recognized as a simple and useful monitoring parameter for drinking water treatment. Using turbidity as an exemplar, this dissertation examines the structure of regulations governing the design of water quality monitoring devices, and the potential impact that regulatory structure has on the design, fabrication, and marketing of water quality monitoring devices, including both closed-source and open-source technology.
  • Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments

    Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments

    GUIDELINES FOR SAFE RECREA TIONAL WATER ENVIRONMENTS TIONAL WATER Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments Volume 2: Swimming Pools and Similar Environments provides an authoritative referenced review and Guidelines for assessment of the health hazards associated with recreational waters of this type; their monitoring and assessment; and activities available for their control through safe recreational water education of users, good design and construction, and good operation and management. The Guidelines include both specific guideline values and good practices. They address a wide range of types of hazard, including hazards leading environments to drowning and injury, water quality, contamination of associated facilities and VOLUME 2 air quality. VOLUME 2. SWIMMING POOLS2. AND SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTS VOLUME SWIMMING POOLS AND The preparation of this volume has covered a period of over a decade and has involved the participation of numerous institutions and more than 60 experts from SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTS 20 countries worldwide. This is the first international point of reference to provide comprehensive guidance for managing swimming pools and similar facilities so that health benefits are maximized while negative public health impacts are minimized. This volume will be useful to a variety of different stakeholders with interests in ensuring the safety of pools and similar environments, including national and local authorities; facility owners, operators and designers (public, semi-public and domestic facilities); special interest groups; public health professionals; scientists and researchers; and facility users. ISBN 92 4 154680 8 WHO GGuidelinesuidelines fforor ssafeafe reecreationalcreational wwaterater eenvironmentsnvironments VVOLUMEOLUME 22:: SSWIMMINGWIMMING PPOOLSOOLS AANDND SSIMILARIMILAR EENVIRONMENTSNVIRONMENTS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 2006 llayoutayout SSafeafe WWater.inddater.indd 1 224.2.20064.2.2006 99:56:44:56:44 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data World Health Organization.
  • Monitoring Turbidity at Dredging Sites

    Monitoring Turbidity at Dredging Sites

    MONITORING TURBIDITY AT DREDGING SITES A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING AND ESTABLISHING TURBIDITY AS A REAL-TIME MONITORING SOLUTION WHAT’S INSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL 01 Environmental Dredging: Overview of USACE Guidelines 02 A Real-Time Solution DREDGING 04 Turbidity Technology 06 Typical Turbidity Monitoring System Overview of USACE Guidelines 08 Points of Compliance Environmental dredging is defined as: “the removal of contaminated sedi- ments from a water body for purposes of sediment remediation” (USACE). Data Management 10 While there are several approaches to dealing with contaminated sediment, 12 Quality Assurance dredging is frequently the cleanup method of choice for projects under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 14 Recommended Equipment (CERCLA), also known as the “Superfund” program. Purchase or Rent? 16 As no two projects are identical, the specific environmental limits set for 17 About Fondriest Environmental a dredging project will vary. Several influencing factors include location, sediment composition, acting regulatory agencies and environmental 18 System Configuration Tool laws. To assist with this effort, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has generated a comprehensive set of guidelines to evaluate environmental dredging as a solution for sediment remediation projects. While the EPA’s remediation guide addresses all possible steps and alternatives for dealing with contaminated sediment, the USACE’s guide focuses specifically on the WHY MONITORING MATTERS dredging component. These guidelines provide detailed steps regarding the establishment Dredging is a common and economically viable solution for the removal and subsequent treatment of contaminated sediment. If executed of a dredging operation, from the preliminary evaluation to the process, properly, dredging can yield positive environmental results without harming water quality conditions.
  • Manual for Real-Time Quality Control of Ocean Optics Data

    Manual for Real-Time Quality Control of Ocean Optics Data

    Manual for Real-Time Quality Control of Ocean Optics Data A Guide to Quality Control and Quality Assurance for Coastal and Ocean Optics Observations Version 1.1 September 2017 Document Validation U.S. IOOS Program Office Validation September 5, 2017 Carl C. Gouldman, U.S. IOOS Program Director Date QARTOD Project Manager Validation September 5, 2017 Kathleen Bailey, U.S. IOOS Project Manager Date QARTOD Board of Advisors Validation September 5, 2017 Julianna O. Thomas, Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System Date ii Table of Contents Document Validation ......................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................... iv Revision History ................................................................................................................................. v Endorsement Disclaimer ................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................