DOCSLIB.ORG

NYCHA 2.0: Progress at Risk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NYCHA 2.0: Progress at Risk Policy Brief September 2019 NYCHA 2.0: Progress at Risk By Sean Campion ast December the New York City Housing Authority L(NYCHA) released NYCHA 2.0, a strategic plan to preserve its deeply affordable housing and address its $32 billion five-year capital need. The plan identified strategies to fund $24 billion in capital repairs over 10 years, clear the lengthy maintenance backlog, and prioritize repairs to ameliorate conditions that cause health and safety problems. While it will not address all of NYCHA’s capital and operating needs, NYCHA 2.0 provided a roadmap to a better future for NYCHA and its residents. 1 This report reviews NYCHA’s progress implementingNYCHA 2.0. The report has four key findings: 1. NYCHA is on pace to meet its short-term target for increasing public-private partnerships to fix and manage NYCHA housing; however, it will not be able to meet its long-term goal of converting 62,000 units without shifts in the allocation of state and local housing funding, federal regulatory relief, and additional federal funding; 2. NYCHA’s efforts to increase the number of mixed-income “infill” development projects and tap into the value of transferrable development rights have largely stalled due to resistance from some public officials and community organizations; 3. NYCHA’s efforts to close the repair backlog have failed thus far to stem the growth in work orders, and efforts to modernize work rules and schedules have yielded some successes but have been accompanied by increased labor costs; and 4. Long-promised state funding and federal regulatory relief have yet to materialize. In sum, NYCHA has made some progress, but its prospects remain tenuous without the cooperation and support of local, state, and federal officials, labor unions, and the private sector. While some of these partners have stepped up, others have resisted much-needed reforms—and the costs of these delays are stark. Holding up revenue-raising projects negatively affects the quality of life for tenants already living in poor conditions, perpetuates or accelerates NYCHA’s physical deterioration, and increases rehabilitation costs. Without the funding anticipated fromNYCHA 2.0 initiatives, more than 4,000 units each year could go without repairs; many will reach the point at which they are at risk of being no longer cost-effective to repair. These challenges highlight the importance of successful implementation of NYCHA 2.0 and the potential impact of failure. NYCHA 2.0 Initiatives NYCHA 2.0 includes two strategies. (See Table 1.) The first, “Invest to Preserve,” is comprised of plans to raise funding for capital repairs through public-private partnerships and the sale of unused development rights. The second, “Fix to Preserve,” encompasses initiatives to address long-standing health and safety issues and basic maintenance needs by promoting a culture of accountability, improving coordination of repair work, and boosting inspection and compliance units. The plan relies on $23.8 billion in funding over 10 years to address NYCHA’s five-year capital needs totaling $31.8 billion. Invest to Preserve initiatives generate most of the funding, including $12.8 billion from accelerating the pace of public-private partnerships under the Permanent Affordability Commitment Together (PACT) program, $2 billion from additional infill development with a higher share of market-rate housing than previously proposed, and $1 billion from the sale of transferrable development rights. (See Table 1.) The plan also assumes the receipt of $7.9 billion in existing funding, including: $3.6 billion in federal funding; $2.2 billion in City funding over 10 2 Table 1: Description of NYCHA 2.0 Strategies and Initiative Revenue Impact Initiative Description (2018-2027) Accelerate pace of Rental Assistance Demonstration/ PACT to Preserve Section 8 conversions from 20,000 units by 2026 to $12.8 Billion 62,000 units by 2028. Increase pace of “infill” development projects and Build to Preserve increase share of market-rate units to 70% to fund $2 Billion repairs at 10,000 NYCHA units. Transfer some of NYCHA's 80 million square feet of Transfer to Preserve unused development rights to adjacent privately-owned $1 Billion sites. Create new divisions to oversee inspections, Organizational and remediation, and compliance; invest in NYCHA-Stat n/a Operational Initiatives improvements to hold managers accountable for key performance indicators; and invest in staff training. Addressing Health and Prioritize issues raised by federal prosecutors for n/a Safety Issues investment (elevators, heating, pests, lead, and mold). Create rapid response teams to close 75,000 Improving Services, Maintaining backlogged work orders for repairs by 2021; and n/a a State of Good Repair schedule bi-monthly Saturday maintenance blitzes. Sourc New York City Housing Authority, NYCHA 2.0: Part 1: Invest to Preserve (December 12, 2018), https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/ny- cha/downloads/pdf/NYCHA-2.0-Part1.pdf; and NYCHA 2.0 Part 2: Fix to Preserve (December 12, 2018), https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/ny- cha/downloads/pdf/NYCHA-2.0-Part2.pdf. years required under the City’s agreement with federal prosecutors and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); $1.4 billion in City capital funding over five years for Mayor’s Initiative programs to repair roofs, boilers, and other essential equipment; and the receipt of $450 million that has been appropriated but not yet released by the State.1 Invest to Preserve Initiatives PACT to Preserve The Citizens Budget Commission’s (CBC's) 2018 report Stabilizing the Foundation recommended NYCHA transition from being a landlord to being an affordable housing steward that directly manages fewer buildings. Public-private partnerships are essential to accomplishing this. NYCHA’s plan to take significantly greater advantage of public-private partnerships through the Permanent Affordability Commitment Together (PACT) program—comprised of Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) projects and project-based Section 8 conversions—is the best option to preserve NYCHA’s housing. 3 ABOUT RAD The Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program is a federal program that allows public housing authorities to apply to HUD to convert the funding stream for units from federal public housing subsidies, established under Section 9 of the Housing Act of 1937, to an equivalent amount in rental housing voucher funding, established under Section 8 of the Housing Act. Section 8 permits housing authorities to take out loans or issue bonds backed by the subsidies to pay for repairs; in contrast, Section 9 largely prohibits housing authorities from issuing debt on their buildings. Housing authorities can also enter into partnerships with private property managers to renovate and operate properties that convert to Section 8 through the RAD program. NYCHA 2.0 anticipates addressing $12.8 billion in capital needs by 2028 by converting 62,000 units through PACT, with an estimated pipeline of projects that ramps up from approximately 4,000 annually in the years between 2019 and 2023 to more than 7,000 units annually by 2026. While NYCHA is making reasonable progress on the PACT to Preserve initiative, it will not meet the 62,000-unit goal without additional federal and city legislative actions, as well as funding—all of which are uncertain. NYCHA has focused first on converting small, scatter-site developments and on properties built by the City and State that currently do not receive federal aid. Prioritizing these properties for RAD conversions makes sense. Scatter-site developments, with about 10,000 total units, are inefficient to operate and have the highest per-unit capital needs in NYCHA’s portfolio.2 There are also eight remaining developments with a total of 5,694 units that were built by the City or the State and are not subsidized by federal funds. In 2018 NYCHA diverted $23 million in federal funds from other properties to subsidize these properties’ operating costs. NYCHA slowly has been converting these units to Section 8 funding streams; accelerating their conversions through PACT will free up funding to be used at other developments.3 NYCHA is almost on track to achieve the first phase of its PACT conversion goal. NYCHA expects to close RAD contracts on 17,994 units with $3.4 billion in five-year capital needs by 2022, a pace slightly below what is needed to meet the NYCHA 2.0 goal. In addition to the 1,395-unit Ocean Bay development, which entered the RAD program in 2017, 3,779 units are now under renovation through the PACT program. Developers have been selected for deals covering another 4,343 units, with closings likely to occur in late 2019 or early 2020. NYCHA has begun resident engagement on 5,908 units and given notice to HUD of its intent to convert an additional 2,569 units.4 Sustaining this momentum and further accelerating the pace of conversions from 4,000 to 7,000 units annually will be hard for two reasons: federal law caps the number of RAD conversions; and NYCHA’s financing model is not replicable across the entire portfolio. 4 T N U NYCHA PACT P S S Units Completed (cean ay) , ,000,000 22, Under Renovation , ,, 0,0 Developer Selected , ,, 0,2 esident ngagement ,0 ,2,2,200 0, Letters of Intent 2, ,,00 , TOTA 17,994 $3,396,329,779 $188,748 Sourc New York City Housing Authority, Draft PHA Agency Plan: Annual Agency Plan for Fiscal Year 2020 2017 Physical Needs Assessment and Development Data Book 2017. RAD Conversions are Capped Congressional authorization of the RAD program caps the number of conversions nationally at 455,000 units, even though there are more than 1 million public housing units nationwide. As of September 2019, 259,713 units have closed or have HUD-approved letters of intent, representing 57 percent of the RAD cap.5 NYCHA will have to compete with other housing authorities for the remaining 43 percent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers
    NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT NAME ADDRESS Manhattan Baruch 595- 605 FDR Drive Staten Island Berry Houses 44 Dongan Hills Brooklyn Farragut 228 York Street Manhattan Harborview Terrace 536 West 56th Street Brooklyn Howard 1620 E N Y Avenue Manhattan Lexington 115 East 98th Steet Brooklyn Marcus Garvey 1440 E N Y Avenue Bronx Monroe 1802 Story Avenue Bronx Pelham Parkway 975 Waring Avenue Brooklyn Pink 2702 Linden Boulevard Queens Ravenswood 34-35A 12th Street Queens Ravenswood 34-35A 12th Street Brooklyn Red Hook East 110 West 9th Street Brooklyn Saratoga Square 930 Halsey Street Manhattan Washington Hts Rehab (Groups I and II) 500 West 164th Street Manhattan Washington Hts Rehab (Groups I and II) 503 West 177th Street Manhattan Wilson 405 East 105th Steet Manhattan Wise Towers/WSURA 136 West 91st Steet Brooklyn Wyckoff Gardens 266 Wyckoff Street Page 1 of 148 10/01/2021 NYCHA Facilities and Service Centers POSTCO STATUS SPONSOR DE Occupied Henry Street Settlement, Inc. Occupied Staten Island Mental Health Society, Inc. 10306 Occupied Spanish Speaking Elderly Council - RAICES Occupied NYCHA 10019 NYCHA HOLD NYCHA 11212 Occupied Lexington Children's Center 10029 Occupied Fort Greene Senior Citizens Council 11212 Vacant NYCHA Occupied Jewish Association Services For the Aged Occupied United Community Centers Occupied HANAC, Inc. 11106 Occupied HANAC, Inc. Occupied Spanish Speaking Elderly Council - RAICES Occupied Ridgewood-Bushwick Sr Citizens Council, Inc. Vacant NYCHA Occupied Provider Name Unknown Occupied
    [Show full text]
  • The City of New York Community Board 8 Manhattan Housing
    Alida Camp 505 Park Avenue, Suite 620 Chair New York, N.Y. 10022 (212) 758-4340 Will Brightbill (212) 758-4616 (Fax) District Manager [email protected] E-Mail www.cb8m.com – Website The City of New York Community Board 8 Manhattan Housing Committee Stanley Isaacs Neighborhood Center 415 East 93rd Street Dining Room A & B Wednesday, February 27, 2019, 6:35 p.m. Please note: The resolutions contained in the committee minutes are recommendations submitted by the committee chair to the Community Board. At the monthly full board meeting, the resolutions are discussed and voted upon by all members of Community Board 8 Manhattan. Minutes CB8 members present: Alida Camp, Barbara Chocky*, Anthony Cohn, Alexandra Harrington*, Ed Hartzog*, Lorraine Johnson*, Peggy Price*, Marco Tamayo Members of the Public: Michael Bacal, A. Balz, D. Balz, Bob Barry (CMA), Albert Bencosme, Rose Bergin, Jean Carbone, Stephanie Chan (Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer’s office), Melanie Coespo-Perez, N. Cohen, Lisa Coleman, Michael Cuttilla, Mike Edison, Faith Fraser, R. Green, Christine Harrington, Brook Hirschfelder, Michael B. Hoffman, Pakhi Kane (Isaacs Center), Allison Krichman, George Lahoud, H. Lax, Terrence Lowenberg (Icon), Gerlind Lwowski, Harrison Manin, Patrick Bradley-Moore, Kristine Papp, Wendy Ravaschiere, Elsbeth Reimann, Barbara Rose, C. Rosenthal, Valerie Stahl, Mahaan Uttam, Stephen Williams Unexcused Absence: Bessie Schachter^* Excused Absence: Rebecca Lamorte*, Rita Popper*, *Housing Committee member ^Public Member The Meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. and the first item on the agenda was considered. Resolutions for Approval: Item 2: Request by 301 East 80th Realty, LLC for an After-Hours Variance at 301 East 80th Street, on the northeast corner of Second Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Final PHA Agency Plan Annual Agency Plan for Fiscal Year 2018
    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Public and Indian Housing Final PHA Agency Plan Annual Agency Plan for Fiscal Year 2018 Shola Olatoye Chair & Chief Executive Officer Date: October 18, 2017 1 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB No. 2577-0226 Annual PHA Plan Office of Public and Indian Housing Expires: 02/29/2016 (Standard PHAs and Troubled PHAs) Purpose. The 5-Year and Annual PHA Plans provide a ready source for interested parties to locate basic PHA policies, rules, and requirements concerning the PHA’s operations, programs, and services, and informs HUD, families served by the PHA, and members of the public of the PHA’s mission, goals and objectives for serving the needs of low- income, very low- income, and extremely low- income families. Applicability. Form HUD-50075-ST is to be completed annually by STANDARD PHAs or TROUBLED PHAs. PHAs that meet the definition of a High Performer PHA, Small PHA, HCV-Only PHA or Qualified PHA do not need to submit this form. Definitions. (1) High-Performer PHA – A PHA that owns or manages more than 550 combined public housing units and housing choice vouchers, and was designated as a high performer on both of the most recent Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS) and Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) assessments if administering both programs, or PHAS if only administering public housing. (2) Small PHA - A PHA that is not designated as PHAS or SEMAP troubled, or at risk of being designated as troubled, that owns or manages less than 250 public housing units and any number of vouchers where the total combined units exceeds 550.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bellwether—A Passive House Tower Renews a Public Housing Campus
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: The Bellwether—A Passive House Tower Renews a Public Housing Campus Author: Daniel Kaplan, Senior Partner, FXCollaborative Subject: Architectural/Design Keywords: Affordable Housing Density Passive Design Vertical Urbanism Publication Date: 2019 Original Publication: 2019 Chicago 10th World Congress Proceedings - 50 Forward | 50 Back Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Daniel Kaplan The Bellwether—A Passive House Tower Renews a Public Housing Campus Abstract Daniel Kaplan Senior Partner This study examines issues and opportunities around The Bellwether, a 52-story tower located FXCollaborative New York, United States in a 1960s public housing campus in Manhattan. It is the first of the New York City Housing Authority’s “NextGen” program, where perimeter sites are being leased to the private sector to spur mixed-income development. The Bellwether incorporates about 400 apartments and Dan Kaplan, FAIA, LEED AP, is a Senior Partner an outward facing, non-profit athletic facility. Its design skillfully inserts a slender tower in a at FXCollaborative, and serves in a design and “left-over” triangular parcel and in doing so, creates a network of improved open spaces on the leadership capacity for many of the firm’s complex, award-winning urban buildings. Adept at creating campus. About to start construction, the project is planned to be the world’s tallest Passivhaus large-scale, high-performance buildings and tower. The Bellwether is emblematic of the type of creative planning and design needed to repair urban designs, Kaplan approaches each project— and elevate these challenged conditions, resulting in a smarter, greener, better integrated, more from individual buildings to large-scale urban efficient and more humane city.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Assembly Rules 822 Legislative Office Building, Albany, Ny 12248 Health Tel: 518-455-4941 Fax: 518-455-5939 Higher Education Richard N
    COMMITTEES: NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY RULES 822 LEGISLATIVE OFFICE BUILDING, ALBANY, NY 12248 HEALTH TEL: 518-455-4941 FAX: 518-455-5939 HIGHER EDUCATION RICHARD N. GOTTFRIED MAJORITY STEERING 75TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 242 WEST 27TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10001 TEL: 212-807-7900; FAX: 212-243-2035 CHAIR CHAIR E-MAIL: [email protected] COMMITTEE ON HEALTH MANHATTAN DELEGATION July 11, 2013 Matthew Wambua, Commissioner Department of Housing Preservation and Development 100 Gold Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Fulton Houses Project – 140001ZMM, N140002ZAM Dear Commissioner Wambua: The Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) should immediately withdraw its plan to build housing on the grounds of the NYCHA Fulton Houses development and remove a playground and community garden and replace them with a parking lot, certified with the City Planning Commission earlier this week. HPD should then work in good faith with the residents of Fulton Houses, the Chelsea community, Community Board 4 and local elected officials to develop a suitable proposal for the site, consistent with HPD’s long-standing promises to the community. The team at HPD who developed the plan and chose how to present it needs to be re-examined, and a new developer should be selected. HPD’s plan to rip out a playground and community garden to build a parking lot, and the fact that this plan was developed and certified for ULURP without any notice to or consultation with the community has quickly generated a high degree of anger and distrust among the community and its leaders. At the community meeting held last night about the project, HPD, the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) and the developer succeeded in heightening that level of anger and distrust, which I had not thought was possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20
    Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20 83 85 82 12 41 62 ID PROPERTY UNITS 6 30 Morningside Drive 205 Total Lease Up 205 12 HAP Seven NY 129 15 418 West 126th Street 75 19 Victoria Theatre 191 15 Total Under Construction 395 19 37 Broadway Development 130 6 41 210 Wadsworth Avenue 98 46 Total Planned 228 43 96th Street 171 43 46 Frederick Douglass Blvd 100 37 62 4037 Broadway 132 82 The Heights on Broadway 171 83 Sherman Plaza 272 85 3875 9th Avenue 614 Total Prospective 1,460 2000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective Manhattan New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q20 44 73 ID PROPERTY UNITS 1 The Smile 233 3 Convivium 140 45 4 Sixty 125 141 4 39 23 26 5 Two Waterline Square 435 Total Lease Up 949 1 74 13 75 10 Sendero Verde Phase II 361 22 24 13 One East Harlem 404 25 Total Under Construction 765 49 22 15 West 118th Street 51 38 23 1971 Madison Avenue 93 10 24 72 East 120th Street 218 77 25 77 East 118th Street 202 47 26 East 127th Street 152 38 La Hermosa Tower 160 39 2031-2033 5th Avenue 240 Total Planned 1,116 48 44 58 West 135th Street 100 45 64-74 West 125th Street 200 47 1987-1991 3rd Avenue 59 76 48 1988-1996 2nd Avenue 185 49 248 East 120th Street 86 50 308 East 86th Street 68 78 52 Lenox Hill Hospital 200 73 Lenox Terrace Phase II 1,642 74 1800 Park Avenue 670 50 75 2460 2nd Avenue 730 3 76 321 East 96th Street 1,100 77 East River Plaza 1,100 52 5 78 Holmes Towers NextGen Development 339 Total Prospective 6,479 1000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND
    [Show full text]
  • Gale A. Brewer, Manhattan Borough President Testimony to the New York City Housing Authority on the Proposed Amendment to the FY2016 Annual Plan April 5, 2016
    Gale A. Brewer, Manhattan Borough President Testimony to the New York City Housing Authority On the Proposed Amendment to the FY2016 Annual Plan April 5, 2016 My name is Gale A. Brewer and I am the Manhattan Borough President. Thank you to Chair Shola Olatoye and to members of the NYCHA Board of Directors for the opportunity to testify today. Today’s hearing addresses changes that NYCHA plans to incorporate into its FY2016 Annual Plan. I would like to speak on two of these changes: Adding two NextGeneration Neighborhoods proposals, commonly known as infill development, for the development of mixed-income housing (50% affordable and 50% market rate) at Holmes Towers on the Upper East Side and Wyckoff Gardens in Brooklyn; and Redefining the definition of “a substantial deviation from the PHA Plan” to exclude conversion of NYCHA housing into Projected Based Rental Assistance or Project Based Voucher Assistance Section 8 housing under the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program. NextGeneration Neighborhoods at Holmes Towers When I testified about NYCHA’s FY2016 Annual Plan in August 2015, I cautioned against offering anything less than 100% affordable housing for infill developments. I foresaw that market rate housing would be planned for neighborhoods with high real estate values and would likely include NYCHA sites in Manhattan. I cannot comment on Wyckoff Gardens since the community engagement process there is different and includes a ULURP. As plans for mixed-income development at Holmes Towers move forward, I continue to call for NYCHA to re-evaluate its intention to promote the 50-50 model for infill projects.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X CAROL DEMECH, LAURIE SOLIS, and ANA FRANCO, 12 CIV 6179
    UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X CAROL DEMECH, LAURIE SOLIS, and ANA FRANCO, 12 CIV 6179 Plaintiff, -against- COMPLAINT JOHN B. RHEA, as Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority, and the NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------X Plaintiffs Carol Demech (“Ms. Demech”), Laurie Solis (“Ms. Solis”) and Ana Franco (“Ms. Franco”) by and through their attorneys, allege as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief as well as compensatory and punitive damages under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, et seq. (“Rehabilitation Act”), and the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8- 101 et. seq. (“NYCHRL”). 2. This action is being filed to stop discrimination on the basis of disability by the New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA”). Two of the Plaintiffs are elderly and all suffer from physical disabilities that impair their ability to walk. Ms. Solis and Ms. Franco use wheelchairs or motorized scooters when traveling outside of their homes. Ms. Demech uses a rolling walker or, at times, a wheelchair, to leave her home. 1 3. Plaintiffs reside in The Fulton Houses, a development managed and operated by NYCHA. The entrance to Plaintiffs’ building in The Fulton Houses is not accessible. Although there is a ramp at the entrance, the ramp is too steep, and it is not accessible to or safely usable by Plaintiffs. The ramp’s steep incline and other design flaws prevent Plaintiffs and other tenants of the building who need an accessible entrance from safely utilizing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelsea NYCHA Working Group Letter from the Chelsea NYCHA Working Group
    CHELSEA NYCHA WORKING GROUP FEB 2021 Working Group Members New York State Senator Chelsea Neighborhood Robert Jackson, NY State Senator Local Partners Residents Johanna Garcia Clinton Housing Development Matthew Levy Company Elliott-Chelsea Houses Chris Nickell Darlene Waters, RA President Savannah Wu Sheila Harris, RA Board Member New York State Assembly Member Julie Elliot Jone Lawson, RA Board Member Richard Gottfried, NY Assembly Hudson Guild Peter Lim, RA Board Member Member Ken Jockers Dolores Payon, RA Board Member Wendi Paster Manhattan Community Board 4 Letisa Romero, RA Board Member Matt Tighe Jesse Bodine Rodney Rutherford, RA Board Member Office of the New York City Public Elzora Cleveland Arimy Fuentes Advocate Nelly Gonzalez Florence Hunter Jumaane Williams, NYC Public Lowell Kern Mary Taylor Advocate Betty Mackintosh Barbara Waddell Steele Delsenia Glover, Deputy Public Mike Noble Fulton Houses Advocate, Housing Equity Joe Restuccia Miguel Acevedo, RA President Ivie Bien Aime John Roche, RA Board Member Office of the New York City Lenny Rosado, RA Board Member Comptroller Nonprofit Organizations Guy Cantales Scott Stringer, NYC Comptroller Citizens Budget Commission Mae Chestnut Brian Cook Sean Campion Eddie Lauria Dylan Hewitt Andrew Rein Mary McGee Nina Saxon Walkiris Rosado Citizens Housing Planning Council Manhattan Borough President Samuel Rosedietcher Jessica Katz Gale Brewer, Manhattan Borough Evelyn Suarez President Community Service Society Hector Vazquez, previously a Lizette Chaparro of New York resident of Elliott-Chelsea Hally Chu Victor Bach Brian Lewis Sam Stein Jessica Mates Tom Waters* Government New York City Council Hester Street U.S. Representative Corey Johnson, City Council Speaker Ibrahim Abdul-Matin Jerry Nadler, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • RESOURCEPAD: a Guide to Child Resources, East Harlem Edition
    RESOURCEPAD: A Guide to Child Resources East Harlem edition 1 About ResourcePad ResourcePad is a product of the East Harlem Action Collaborative for Child Health and Well-being. The New York Academy of Medicine brings together the trusted voices of resident caregivers, along with direct service providers, technical advisors, and elected and public officials to form the East Harlem Action Collaborative (EHAC) for Child Health and Well-being. Local caregivers identify solutions and put forth recommendations for a better tomorrow for all children. Central to this work is learning about the assets that families leverage to raise healthy children in East Harlem despite systemic barriers. ResourcePad Features Since January 2019, the EHAC team has researched childhood resources in East Harlem. ResourcePad features a compilation of services found in existing directories, resources from local community meetings, and resources directly informed by East Harlem residents. ResourcePad features a diverse collection of programs for East Harlem children and families. This document, while comprehensive, does not represent all services offered in East Harlem and is designed for the benefit of the community. Any service or organization listed in ResourcePad does not constitute or imply the endorsement, recommendation, or favoring of its employees by the New York Academy of Medicine. Compiled by: Kaylee Krager, MPH Suggested Citation: East Harlem Action Collaborative for Child Health and Well-being. (2019). ResourcePad: A Guide to Child Health Resources (East Harlem edition.). Retrieved from the New York Academy of Medicine. 2 East Harlem Child Health Services East Harlem Edition (12/17/19) Table of Contents East Harlem Elected Officials………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 East Harlem Community Centers………………………………………………………………………………………..….5 NYC Agencies………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Child Development ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Data Book 2020
    NYCHA DEVELOPMENT DATA BOOK 2020 Created by the Performance Tracking and Analytics Department 1 2 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FOR 2020 Welcome to the 2020 Edition of the NYCHA Development Data Book. The Performance Tracking and Analytics Department (PTAD) has made a variety of changes to the book this year that will enhance its value as an information source. 302 Developments This year, the data for the Resident Data Book includes data for all 302 developments in NYCHA’s portfolio as of February 13, 2020. 9 RAD transactions occurred on February 12, 2020 and these developments are not included in any summary totals, development pages, or overall counts in the 2020 Development Data Book or Resident Data Book. Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD)/Permanent Affordability Commitment Together (PACT) Developments Below is the list of developments that underwent a Rental Assistance (RAD) / Permanent Affordability Commitment Together (PACT) conversion as of February 13, 2020. Disposed February 2020 Disposed November 2018 • 572 Warren Street • Betances I • Armstrong I • Betances II 13 • Armstrong II • Betances II, 18 • Berry Street - South 9th Street • Betances II, 9A • Independence • Betances III, 13 • Marcy Avenue - Greene Avenue Site A • Betances III, 18 • Marcy Avenue - Greene Avenue Site B • Betances III, 9A • Weeksville Gardens • Betances IV • Williams Plaza • Betances V • Betances VI Disposed July 2019 • Franklin Avenue I Conventional • Bushwick II (Groups A & C) • Franklin Avenue II Conventional • Bushwick II (Groups B & D) • Franklin Avenue III Conventional • Bushwick II CDA (Group E) • Highbridge Rehabs (Anderson Avenue) • Hope Gardens • Highbridge Rehabs (Nelson Avenue) • Palmetto Gardens Disposed October 2018 Disposed December 2018 • Twin Parks West (Sites 1 & 2) • Baychester • Murphy Disposed January 2017 • Ocean Bay (Bayside) 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Frustrated with No Response to Complaints, Tenants Sue NYCHA to Get Safe Wheelchair Ramp
    For more information: Orier Okumakpeyi – 212-417-3735 [email protected] Kevin Cremin – 212-417-3759 [email protected] Main phone: 212-417-3700 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Frustrated with No Response to Complaints, Tenants Sue NYCHA to Get Safe Wheelchair Ramp Steep Ramp Violates ADA and Prevents Tenants with Disabilities from Safely Leaving and Entering Building NEW YORK, NY, AUGUST 13, 2012—Three tenants of the New York City Housing Authority’s (NYCHA) Fulton Houses on West 17 th Street in Manhattan filed suit against the agency today for failing to correct an access ramp that is too dangerous for people using wheelchairs, motorized scooters or walkers to use safely, rendering the entrance inaccessible to them. The suit, filed on behalf of the tenants in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York by MFY Legal Services, Inc., a non-profit legal services provider, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief as well as compensatory and punitive damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the New York City Human Rights Law. “The ramp is so dangerous that these women can’t navigate it on their own. Even when they have help, there have been accidents and close calls,” said Orier Okumakpeyi, one of the MFY attorneys representing the tenants. “NYCHA has agreed that the ramp needs to be fixed, but after six years of complaints, it has still done nothing.” On one occasion a 67-year-old tenant who has multiple health problems that require her to use a motorized wheelchair traveled down the steep ramp accompanied by her home attendant.
    [Show full text]