Integrating Land Use Planning and Biodiversity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrating Land Use Planning and Biodiversity ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank all of the participants in the workshop for their valuable contributions before, during and after the workshop. Mark Shaffer, senior vice president for program, Laura Watchman, vice president for habitat conservation, and Sara Vickerman, director west coast office of Defenders of Wildlife provided guidance in the creation of the workshop and this report. Tim Mealey, senior partner at Meridian Institute served as an effective facilitator at the workshop. Chuck Huckelberry, Pima County Administrator, and Sharon McGregor, Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, both gave excellent overview presentations of their planning projects at the workshop. Marc Bonta, Lisa Hummon, Inga Sedlovsky, and Chapman Stewart of Defenders of Wildlife helped with logistics for the workshop. Kathie Cowell and Mitzi Wallace at the Aspen Wye River Conference Center were extremely helpful in arranging the workshop. Maeveen Behan, Pima County, Arizona, and Jessica Patalano, Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program, provided map graphics for the report. The authors especially wish to acknowledge Kassandra Stirling, media production specialist with Defenders' west coast office for bringing the final report together. Any errors or misrepresentations of the various planning efforts described here are ultimately the fault of the authors. Authors Jeffrey P. Cohn, writer, Takoma Park, Maryland Jeffrey A. Lerner, Conservation Planning Associate, Defenders of Wildlife Editor Elizabeth Grossman, writer, Portland, Oregon Project Manager Jeffrey A. Lerner, Conservation Planning Associate, Defenders of Wildlife Production Lisa Hummon, Habitat Program Coordinator, Defenders of Wildlife Kassandra Stirling, Media Production Specialist, Defenders of Wildlife Designer Manda Beckett, Claritas Consortium, Portland, Oregon Maps provided by Oregon Biodiversity Project, West Linn, Oregon; Defenders of Wildlife, Washington D.C.; Willamette Restoration Initiative, Salem, Oregon; Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan, Pima County, Arizona; The BioMap Project, Westborough, Massachusetts. Additional copies of this report may be downloaded from the Biodiversity Partnership website at www.biodiversitypartners.org Copyright © 2003 by Defenders of Wildlife, 1101 Fourteenth Street, NW, Suite 1400, Washington, D.C. 20005 All rights reserved. Abstracting is permitted with credit to the source. Printed on recycled paper INTEGRATING LAND USE PLANNING & BIODIVERSITY DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE WASHINGTON D.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 7 INTRODUCTION . 9 Biodiversity at Risk Need for Conservation Planning Promoting Comprehensive Conservation Planning CONSERVATION PLANS IN PROGRESS . 15 Massachusetts BioMap Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan Oregon Biodiversity Project Willamette Restoration Initiative WORKSHOP DISCUSSION . 17 Benefits of Adopting Conservation Planning Barriers To Using Conservation Planning at the Local Level Recommendations for Creating State and Regional Conservation Plans Recommendations For Integrating Regional Conservation Plans into Local Planning The Role of Conservation Organizations CONCLUSIONS . 25 CONSERVATION PLANNING MAPS . 27 APPENDIX A: PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS . 33 I. STATEWIDE PLANS . 33 1. Oregon Biodiversity Plan, Oregon; West Eugene Wetlands, Oregon 2. Florida Closing the Gaps Project; Florida Ecological Network 3. Maryland Green Infrastructure and GreenPrint Program; Baltimore Greenways, Maryland 4. New Jersey Landscape Project; New Jersey Pine Barrens 5. Massachusetts BioMap 6. Washington State Growth Management and Ecoregional Conservation II. REGIONAL MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS . 46 1. Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan, Pima County, Arizona 2. Southern California Habitat Conservation Plans 3. Placer Legacy Open Space and Agricultural Conservation Program 4. Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, Clark County, Nevada III. REGIONAL PLANS . 52 1. Chicago Wilderness 2. Metropolitan Conservation Alliance 3. "Beginning with Habitat" Program, Southern Maine 4. Minnesota Metro Greenways 5. Albemarle County, Virginia 6. The Partnership Land Use System, Larimer County, Colorado APPENDIX B: CONSERVATION PLANNING CONTACTS . 58 APPENDIX C: WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS . 60 LITERATURE CITED . 61 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY prawl now has such a large and permanent importance of the natural environment to their communi- impact on every aspect of the landscape that to achieve ties' quality of life, and realize that their decisions can their goals for wildlife and ecosystem protection, conser- affect human society and wildlife habitats far into the vationists must become involved in land use planning. future. Despite this understanding and land use planning's Development is encroaching on parks and protected influence on the landscape, conservationists have tradi- areas. For every new acre protected, many more are lost tionally made little use of the local planning process in to poorly planned development. The Natural Resources working toward biodiversity protection. Inventory estimates that in the United States, 2.2 million acres are now being converted to development each year. With funding from the Doris Duke Charitable Roads have an ecological impact on an estimated 20 per- Foundation, Defenders of Wildlife brought together land cent of the U.S. landscape. Of the 6,700 species in the use planners and conservationists from around the coun- U.S. considered at risk of extinction, 85 percent suffer try at a workshop held in the spring of 2002. The work- primarily from habitat loss. Although federal wildlife shop's goal was to begin a national dialogue about the agencies list only approximately 1,300 of these species integration of biodiversity and land use planning. This under the Endangered Species Act, implementing the act report attempts to summarize that discussion and draw remains controversial. If such ecological problems are to attention to the numerous fledgling efforts at conserva- be solved, conservationists and land use planners must tion planning currently underway in communities work together. Yet how can the planning community throughout the country. make use of the vast quantity of available conservation information and the tools of their trade to improve the The workshop emphasized large-scale conservation plan- prospects for the preservation of biodiversity? ning: the networks of conservation lands that are being planned at state and regional levels across the country. Land use planning occurs at many different scales across Ideally, this approach will help preserve the country's the country. At its best, it is progressive, democratic, rich biodiversity by protecting its most viable habitats timely and responsive to change. When it works, commu- and species populations. This strategy represents current nities thrive and enjoy a high quality of life. When land theories on the application of conservation biology use planning fails, communities struggle for years with principles to wildlife preservation, and is conservation the consequences. Many planners understand the biologists' recommendation for curtailing loss of habitat 7 LAND USE PLANNING AND BIODIVERSITY and biodiversity. Workshop organizers felt it was crucial isolation. Property owners, government agencies and spe- to understand how local land use planners view such cial interest groups will all want to be involved in mak- plans. ing decisions that affect land use. For years, the conser- vation community has discussed the need to include part- Among the messages repeated at the workshop was that nerships and multiple stakeholders in their projects. This existing land use planning tools can be used to protect is especially true in the local land use planning process, biodiversity. The conservation plans presented at the particularly in urban areas with large, diverse popula- workshop showed how a variety of incentive-based pro- tions. A conservation plan can only succeed when a com- grams and regulations can be applied locally to protect munity understands and accepts the plan's methodology, biodiversity. These presentations also indicated that plan- goals and results. ners can and do make efforts to assemble networks of conservation lands but that land acquisition — by conser- Large-scale conservation plans work best when used as vation organizations and/or federal agencies — is not the guidelines and should not be confused with specific, pre- only solution to protecting lands of conservation value. scriptive land use plans. Large-scale conservation plans can be used to steer development away from ecologically The lack of political will among community leaders can, significant areas, but this also requires many more however, hamper planners' efforts to use conservation detailed site-specific decisions than such large-scale information or make creative use of planning tools. plans provide. To ensure that they satisfy local needs for Developing political support for biodiversity protection open space, large-scale conservation plans may have to may be one of the more significant hurdles for large- be modified. scale conservation planning efforts to overcome. Planners are not the only people with whom conservationists need Land use planning can determine how — or even if — to communicate effectively. Members of local planning the country's urban areas expand, how they affect the sur- boards and commissions are tremendously influential, rounding landscape, and health of our environment. The and must be educated and kept informed about workshop discussion
Recommended publications
  • Land-Use, Land-Cover Changes and Biodiversity Loss - Helena Freitas
    LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Land-Use, Land-Cover Changes and Biodiversity Loss - Helena Freitas LAND-USE, LAND-COVER CHANGES AND BIODIVERSITY LOSS Helena Freitas University of Coimbra, Portugal Keywords: land use; habitat fragmentation; biodiversity loss Contents 1. Introduction 2. Primary Causes of Biodiversity Loss 2.1. Habitat Degradation and Destruction 2.2. Habitat Fragmentation 2.3. Global Climate Change 3. Strategies for Biodiversity Conservation 3.1. General 3.2. The European Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 4. Conclusions Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary During Earth's history, species extinction has probably been caused by modifications of the physical environment after impacts such as meteorites or volcanic activity. On the contrary, the actual extinction of species is mainly a result of human activities, namely any form of land use that causes the conversion of vast areas to settlement, agriculture, and forestry, resulting in habitat destruction, degradation, and fragmentation, which are among the most important causes of species decline and extinction. The loss of biodiversity is unique among the major anthropogenic changes because it is irreversible. The importance of preserving biodiversity has increased in recent times. The global recognition of the alarming loss of biodiversity and the acceptance of its value resultedUNESCO in the Convention on Biologi – calEOLSS Diversity. In addition, in Europe, the challenge is also the implementation of the European strategy for biodiversity conservation and agricultural policies, though it is increasingly recognized that the strategy is limitedSAMPLE by a lack of basic ecological CHAPTERS information and indicators available to decision makers and end users. We have reached a point where we can save biodiversity only by saving the biosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Land Use Element Within the Comprehensive Planning Process 2
    Chapter The Land Use Element within the Comprehensive Planning Process 2 Included in this chapter: The Land Use Element: Framework and Requirements Using the Land Use Element to Integrate Elements Developing Consistency Between Plan Elements Designing a Public Participation Plan Introduction The land use element is often lengthy as it serves as a centerpiece of the comprehensive The land use element is one of nine required plan and ties together many other elements. elements within Wisconsin’s comprehensive This chapter includes a discussion of the planning law. The major goal in completing statutory requirements, a section on how to this element is to create a useful tool for use the land use element to integrate other decision makers (elected officials and plan elements, and public participation plan commissioners) to guide growth and essential to the development of the plan. development in their communities, for developers as they seek planned areas to advance projects, and for residents and others to make known their desire for growth and change in the future. Chapter 2 – The Land Use Element within the Comprehensive Planning Process Land Use Element (§66.1001(2)(h)) - Statutory language A compilation of objectives, policies, goals, maps and programs to guide the future development and redevelopment of public and private property. The element shall contain a listing of the amount, type, intensity, and net density of existing uses of land in the local governmental unit, such as agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial, and other public and private uses. The element shall analyze trends in the supply, demand and price of land, opportunities for redevelopment and existing and potential land-use conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanistica N. 146 April-June 2011
    Urbanistica n. 146 April-June 2011 Distribution by www.planum.net Index and english translation of the articles Paolo Avarello The plan is dead, long live the plan edited by Gianfranco Gorelli Urban regeneration: fundamental strategy of the new structural Plan of Prato Paolo Maria Vannucchi The ‘factory town’: a problematic reality Michela Brachi, Pamela Bracciotti, Massimo Fabbri The project (pre)view Riccardo Pecorario The path from structure Plan to urban design edited by Carla Ferrari A structural plan for a ‘City of the wine’: the Ps of the Municipality of Bomporto Projects and implementation Raffaella Radoccia Co-planning Pto in the Val Pescara Mariangela Virno Temporal policies in the Abruzzo Region Stefano Stabilini, Roberto Zedda Chronographic analysis of the Urban systems. The case of Pescara edited by Simone Ombuen The geographical digital information in the planning ‘knowledge frameworks’ Simone Ombuen The european implementation of the Inspire directive and the Plan4all project Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen, Interoperability and spatial planners: a proposal for a land use Franco Vico ‘data model’ Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen What is a land use data model? Giuseppe De Marco Interoperability and metadata catalogues Stefano Magaudda Relationships among regional planning laws, ‘knowledge fra- meworks’ and Territorial information systems in Italy Gaia Caramellino Towards a national Plan. Shaping cuban planning during the fifties Profiles and practices Rosario Pavia Waterfrontstory Carlos Smaniotto Costa, Monica Bocci Brasilia, the city of the future is 50 years old. The urban design and the challenges of the Brazilian national capital Michele Talia To research of one impossible balance Antonella Radicchi On the sonic image of the city Marco Barbieri Urban grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2010 Update City Of
    COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 2010 UPDATE CITY OF SPRINGDALE, ARKANSAS The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is the City’s official guide for future development of the City. It translates values into a scheme that describes, how, why, when and where to build, rebuild or preserve the community. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN covers a period greater than one year but does not have a definite time limit. In the past the Land Use Plan was considered to be a snapshot or frozen image of what the City would look like twenty, thirty or forty years later, but there was little guidance as to how to get there. This Comprehensive Land Use Plan expresses current goals and policies that will shape the future, rather than show a rigid image of the future itself. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN covers the entire city and its established planning area. Arkansas Statues §14-56-413 allows the City to designate the area within the territorial jurisdiction for which it will prepare plans, ordinances and regulations. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is a statement of policy that covers such community desires as quality of life, character, and rate of grow and indicates how these desires are to be achieved. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is not a zoning ordinance, subdivision regulation, official map, budget or capital improvement program. It is a guide to the preparation and the carrying out of the components of the planning process. The COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN is a guide to decision making by the Planning Commission, the City Council and the Mayor.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Use of Soils and Water: the Role of Environmental Land Use Conflicts
    sustainability Editorial Sustainable Use of Soils and Water: The Role of Environmental Land Use Conflicts Fernando A. L. Pacheco CQVR – Chemistry Research Centre, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados Ap. 1013, Vila Real 5001-801, Portugal; [email protected] Received: 3 February 2020; Accepted: 4 February 2020; Published: 6 February 2020 Abstract: Sustainability is a utopia of societies, that could be achieved by a harmonious balance between socio-economic development and environmental protection, including the sustainable exploitation of natural resources. The present Special Issue addresses a multiplicity of realities that confirm a deviation from this utopia in the real world, as well as the concerns of researchers. These scholars point to measures that could help lead the damaged environment to a better status. The studies were focused on sustainable use of soils and water, as well as on land use or occupation changes that can negatively affect the quality of those resources. Some other studies attempt to assess (un)sustainability in specific regions through holistic approaches, like the land carrying capacity, the green gross domestic product or the eco-security models. Overall, the special issue provides a panoramic view of competing interests for land and the consequences for the environment derived therefrom. Keywords: water resources; soil; land use change; conflicts; environmental degradation; sustainability Competition for land is a worldwide problem affecting developed as well as developing countries, because the economic growth of activity sectors often requires the expansion of occupied land, sometimes to places that overlap different sectors. Besides the social tension and conflicts eventually caused by the competing interests for land, the environmental problems they can trigger and sustain cannot be overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES
    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Policy and Urbanization in the People's Republic of China
    ADBI Working Paper Series LAND POLICY AND URBANIZATION IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Li Zhang and Xianxiang Xu No. 614 November 2016 Asian Development Bank Institute Li Zhang is an associate professor at the International School of Business & Finance, Sun Yat-sen University. Xianxiang Xu is a professor at the Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Zhang, L., and X. Xu. 2016. Land Policy and Urbanization in the People’s Republic of China. ADBI Working Paper 614. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/land-policy-and-urbanization-prc Please contact the authors for information about this paper. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Unless otherwise stated, figures and tables without explicit sources were prepared by the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Buying a Mining Claim from BLM Field Offices Bureau of Land Management the Internet
    U.S. Department of the Interior Investigate before buying a mining claim from BLM Field Offices Bureau of Land Management the internet. The BLM manages public lands to support many uses, FRONT RANGE DISTRICT including mining claims Royal Gorge Field Office 3028 E. Main St. and mineral Cañon City, CO 81212 extraction. You 719-269-8500 can file mining Buying A claims on any San Luis Valley Field Office 1313 E. Highway 160 public lands Monte Vista, CO 81144 that are open to 719-852-7074 Mining Claim mineral entry, and the law NORTHWEST DISTRICT Important Information You Should Know encourages you Colorado River Valley Field Office to explore and 2300 River Frontage Road develop minerals Silt, CO 81652 in those areas. 970-876-9000 However, before Grand Junction Field Office buying an 2815 H Road unpatented mining claim from a private seller, make sure Grand Junction, CO 81506 you understand what you are purchasing. 970-244-3000 Kremmling Field Office A Federal unpatented mining claim describes a parcel 2103 E. Park Ave. of federal land that may contain valuable minerals. Any Kremmling, CO 80459 prospective buyer should understand federal mining laws, 970-724-3000 including the rights and responsibilities of an unpatented mining claim. Little Snake Field Office 455 Emerson St. Craig, CO 81625 Keep in mind the phrase “buyer beware” when 970-826-5000 deciding to purchase a mining claim via an White River Field Office Sellers may provide incomplete or internet site. 220 E. Market St. incorrect information about the mining claim or what Meeker, CO 81641 type of operation is allowable on the claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Land Degradation
    Final Government Distribution Chapter 4: IPCC SRCCL 1 Chapter 4: Land Degradation 2 3 Coordinating Lead Authors: Lennart Olsson (Sweden), Humberto Barbosa (Brazil) 4 Lead Authors: Suruchi Bhadwal (India), Annette Cowie (Australia), Kenel Delusca (Haiti), Dulce 5 Flores-Renteria (Mexico), Kathleen Hermans (Germany), Esteban Jobbagy (Argentina), Werner Kurz 6 (Canada), Diqiang Li (China), Denis Jean Sonwa (Cameroon), Lindsay Stringer (United Kingdom) 7 Contributing Authors: Timothy Crews (The United States of America), Martin Dallimer (United 8 Kingdom), Joris Eekhout (The Netherlands), Karlheinz Erb (Italy), Eamon Haughey (Ireland), 9 Richard Houghton (The United States of America), Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal (Pakistan), Francis X. 10 Johnson (The United States of America), Woo-Kyun Lee (The Republic of Korea), John Morton 11 (United Kingdom), Felipe Garcia Oliva (Mexico), Jan Petzold (Germany), Mohammad Rahimi (Iran), 12 Florence Renou-Wilson (Ireland), Anna Tengberg (Sweden), Louis Verchot (Colombia/The United 13 States of America), Katharine Vincent (South Africa) 14 Review Editors: José Manuel Moreno Rodriguez (Spain), Carolina Vera (Argentina) 15 Chapter Scientist: Aliyu Salisu Barau (Nigeria) 16 Date of Draft: 07/08/2019 17 Subject to Copy-editing 4-1 Total pages: 186 Final Government Distribution Chapter 4: IPCC SRCCL 1 2 Table of Contents 3 Chapter 4: Land Degradation ......................................................................................................... 4-1 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Revised RECOVERY PLAN for the Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) Original Plan Approved: November 1993 Prepared by: Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montana Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office Billings, Montana For Mountain-Prairie Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Denver, CO January 2014 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Plans are reviewed by the public and subject to additional peer review before they are adopted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Objectives will only be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species’ status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Copies of all documents reviewed in development of the plan are available in the administrative record, located at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Montana Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Billings, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Degradation
    SPM4 Land degradation Coordinating Lead Authors: Lennart Olsson (Sweden), Humberto Barbosa (Brazil) Lead Authors: Suruchi Bhadwal (India), Annette Cowie (Australia), Kenel Delusca (Haiti), Dulce Flores-Renteria (Mexico), Kathleen Hermans (Germany), Esteban Jobbagy (Argentina), Werner Kurz (Canada), Diqiang Li (China), Denis Jean Sonwa (Cameroon), Lindsay Stringer (United Kingdom) Contributing Authors: Timothy Crews (The United States of America), Martin Dallimer (United Kingdom), Joris Eekhout (The Netherlands), Karlheinz Erb (Italy), Eamon Haughey (Ireland), Richard Houghton (The United States of America), Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal (Pakistan), Francis X. Johnson (The United States of America), Woo-Kyun Lee (The Republic of Korea), John Morton (United Kingdom), Felipe Garcia Oliva (Mexico), Jan Petzold (Germany), Mohammad Rahimi (Iran), Florence Renou-Wilson (Ireland), Anna Tengberg (Sweden), Louis Verchot (Colombia/ The United States of America), Katharine Vincent (South Africa) Review Editors: José Manuel Moreno (Spain), Carolina Vera (Argentina) Chapter Scientist: Aliyu Salisu Barau (Nigeria) This chapter should be cited as: Olsson, L., H. Barbosa, S. Bhadwal, A. Cowie, K. Delusca, D. Flores-Renteria, K. Hermans, E. Jobbagy, W. Kurz, D. Li, D.J. Sonwa, L. Stringer, 2019: Land Degradation. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. In press.
    [Show full text]