DOCSLIB.ORG

Everything You Need to Know

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Everything You Need to Know Anesthesia 101 Everything you need to know Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. 2.8 1.5 ANCC CONTACT HOURS CONTACT HOURS By Laura Palmer, DNP, CRNA, MNEd Successful patient outcomes from an operative procedure require vigilance, diligence, and teamwork among the various providers involved with the surgical procedure. An understanding of the responsibilities and appreciation for the complexities of each healthcare provider’s role in the operative process is essential to a harmonious relationship among the perioperative Steam to improve the working environment and provide safe patient care. The information provided in this article is based on commonly observed practices in the anesthesia community with the caveat that the choices can vary considerably and are influenced by patient presentation and surgical requirements. Provision of anesthesia services Several regulatory agencies at state and federal levels, along with reimburse- ment requirements, control who can provide anesthesia services. Providers are generally limited to physicians, certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), and anesthesia assistants (AAs) in a limited number of states. The practice patterns commonly seen are: anesthesiologists or CRNAs indepen- dently providing direct anesthesia care, CRNAs and anesthesiologists work- ing together in the anesthesia care team model, or physicians medically directing AAs. CRNAs receive direct reimbursement from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, but AAs must always work with anesthesiologists in the medical direction model.1 Although the provider administering anesthesia can vary by practice setting and geographic location, the process and goals are comparable. Types of anesthesia When anesthesia services are necessary, there are several options to provide the patient with pain relief, reduce anxiety, and meet the requirements of the surgical procedure. There are three basic types of anesthesia: general, regional, and monitored anesthesia care (MAC); sometimes, a combination www.ORNurseJournal.com July OR Nurse2013 21 Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Anesthesia 101: Everything you need to know of techniques is appropriate. General anesthesia is Joint Commission, and the FDA Safe Use Initiative.3-5 selected when the patient and surgical needs require Risk assessment, such as the prevention of intraoper- complete immobility and unconsciousness. Regional ative fire, rely on the combined vigilance of the OR anesthesia includes spinal and epidural anesthetics staff, surgeon, anesthesia providers, and effective/ (neuraxial blocks) and peripheral nerve blocks of open communication with an understanding of each various types. These techniques are often appropriate provider’s responsibility, which can help prevent for surgeries involving the extremities or the lower disastrous patient outcomes. Presurgical checklists abdomen and perineal area. Although a regional emphasize verification of the correct patient, correct technique can provide complete pain relief to the procedure, and, if relevant, correct side. These tools operative area, patients are often more comfortable have demonstrated effectiveness, but their routine when sedation is also administered. implementation in clinical practice isn’t uniform.6 Patients can be distracted and fearful of the ambi- ent noises in an OR combined with the conversa- General anesthesia tions between the surgical and anesthesia teams. In The goals of general anesthesia are to provide amne- addition, despite surgical site anesthesia, the patient sia, analgesia, and immobility. Analgesia includes a may find the pressure of the drapes on areas not blockade of the sympathetic response to noxious anesthetized to be uncomfortable. Sensations from stimuli, specifically surgical stimulation. If needed, surgical manipulation can extend outside the anes- neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs), also known thetized area, and although they may not be painful, as muscle relaxants, may be administered to facilitate they can add to the discomfort. surgical access to the operative region. The process In select cases, surgery can be performed with of general anesthesia begins with a phase known as various levels of sedation combined with a local anes- induction, which is accomplished by two methods. thetic injected at the operative site by the surgeon. Injection of an I.V. drug is the common approach in The term MAC is an anesthesia service description the adult population and is a rapid process in which and includes all levels of sedation from minimal to unconsciousness is achieved roughly 1 minute after deep.2 MAC requires the anesthesia provider to be administration of the induction medication. All of the capable of converting to general anesthesia (if neces- agents used for inductions produce an expected sary) in addition to being skilled at advanced airway apnea, and airway management skill is essential. In management if deep sedation causes airway compro- the pediatric population, where gaining I.V. access mise. The depth of sedation that can be provided by preoperatively isn’t well-tolerated, a volatile anes- nonanesthesia providers, usually RNs, is controlled thetic agent by mask is the preferred approach for by regulations, such as state nurse practice acts and induction. Compared to I.V. induction, an inhalation institutional guidelines, and is usually limited to induction requires more time to take effect, and the minimal or moderate sedation where airway com- patient may demonstrate progression through the promise isn’t expected. various stages of anesthesia not seen with an I.V. Regional anesthesia can be useful in many cases induction.7 for postoperative pain control, sometimes initiated Most important is that some patients experience before the surgery and combined with a general excitement when progressing from drowsiness to anesthetic to provide the conditions required to unconsciousness. This is a critical phase with the perform the procedure. potential for several adverse events, such as thrash- ing or movement, vomiting, laryngospasm (closure Preoperative management of the vocal cords obstructing air flow), and dysrhyth- The anesthesia provider performs a thorough pre- mias. Although a quiet environment is preferred for operative evaluation, which is essential to identify all inductions, minimizing noise with this technique comorbidities and assess the patient’s current health is especially important because auditory senses are status to determine the most appropriate type of heightened, and exaggerated responses may occur. anesthesia. In this preoperative period, the entire All OR personnel should be vigilant for sudden perioperative team should discuss the assessment of movements that could cause the patient to fall safety risks and the use of checklists, which are rec- from the OR table, especially in the pediatric envi- ommended by the World Health Organization, The ronment where safety belting is limited in smaller 22 OR Nurse 2013 July www.ORNurseJournal.com Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. LMA and endotracheal intubation A. Laryngeal mask airway. B. Intranasal endotracheal intubation. C. Oral endotracheal intubation (SLJORWWLV (SLJORWWLV (SLJORWWLV 7UDFKHD 7UDFKHD 7UDFKHD (VRSKDJXV (VRSKDJXV (VRSKDJXV /DU\QJHDOPDVN $/DU\QJHDOPDVNDLUZD\ /0$ %,QWUDQDVDOHQGRWUDFKHDOLQWXEDWLRQ &2UDOHQGRWUDFKHDOLQWXEDWLRQ Source: Smeltzer SC, Bare BG, Hinkle JL, Cheever KH. Brunner & Suddarth’s Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010:450. patients. Since airway compromise can occur rap- An advantage to using an LMA is that it elimi- idly, it’s essential to have additional OR personnel nates the risks associated with intubation of the tra- available. chea, such as trauma and dental damage. Although When general anesthesia is selected, there are anesthesia can be provided in select circumstances several options for the type of induction and medi- via mask, this method has been largely replaced cation choices. The anesthesia provider must deter- by LMAs, which free the provider’s hands for mine whether endotracheal intubation is required other tasks.9 or if an alternative airway device, such as a laryngeal The sequence of actions during a standard induc- mask airway (LMA), can be used (see LMA and tion with intubation usually starts with the adminis- endotracheal intubation). These are reserved for cases tration of preoperative sedation, sometimes in the meeting specific requirements, including patients holding area, and additionally after the patient is who have been N.P.O. and without known risk secured on the OR table and monitors are applied. of aspiration because the LMA is seated proximal Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine, is com- to the glottis and doesn’t seal the airway from monly used for sedation because it reduces anxiety secretions.8 and causes amnesia with minimal cardiovascular Since the introduction of the LMA into clinical effects. Patients receive oxygen via facemask prior practice in 1988, there’s been considerable contro- to receiving an I.V. induction agent. versy regarding the selection criteria for use of this After determining that the patient is unconscious, device in different clinical situations, often with an NMBD is administered. It’s important to note, opposite viewpoints
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures Using Supreme™ Airway Laryngeal Mask During Minor Surgical Procedure
    medicina Article Evaluation of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures Using Supreme™ Airway Laryngeal Mask during Minor Surgical Procedures in Children Mascha O. Fiedler 1,* , Elisabeth Schätzle 2, Marius Contzen 3, Christian Gernoth 4, Christel Weiß 5, Thomas Walter 6, Tim Viergutz 2 and Armin Kalenka 7 1 Clinic of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 2 Clinic of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; [email protected] (E.S.); [email protected] (T.V.) 3 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heilig-Geist-Hospital Bensheim, 64625 Bensheim, Germany; [email protected] 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Pain Therapy, Helios Hospital Duisburg, 47166 Duisburg, Germany; [email protected] 5 Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; [email protected] 6 Emergency Department, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; [email protected] 7 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Bergstrasse, 64646 Heppenheim, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: mascha.fi[email protected]; Tel.: +49-(0)-6222-1563-9434 Received: 21 September 2020; Accepted: 19 October 2020; Published: 21 October 2020 Abstract: Background and objectives: The laryngeal mask is the method of choice for airway management in children during minor surgical procedures. There is a paucity of data regarding optimal management of mechanical ventilation in these patients. The Supreme™ airway laryngeal mask offers the option to insert a gastric tube to empty the stomach contents of air and/or gastric juice.
    [Show full text]
  • General Anesthesia and Altered States of Arousal: a Systems Neuroscience Analysis
    General Anesthesia and Altered States of Arousal: A Systems Neuroscience Analysis The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Brown, Emery N., Patrick L. Purdon, and Christa J. Van Dort. “General Anesthesia and Altered States of Arousal: A Systems Neuroscience Analysis.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 34, no. 1 (July 21, 2011): 601–628. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153200 Publisher Annual Reviews Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86331 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Annu Rev Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 July 06. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011 ; 34: 601–628. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153200. General Anesthesia and Altered States of Arousal: A Systems Neuroscience Analysis Emery N. Brown1,2,3, Patrick L. Purdon1,2, and Christa J. Van Dort1,2 Emery N. Brown: [email protected]; Patrick L. Purdon: [email protected]; Christa J. Van Dort: [email protected] 1Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 2Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 3Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 Abstract Placing a patient in a state of general anesthesia is crucial for safely and humanely performing most surgical and many nonsurgical procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laryngeal Mask Airway: Potential Applications in Neonates
    F485 Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed: first published as 10.1136/adc.2003.038430 on 21 October 2004. Downloaded from PERSONAL PRACTICE The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates D Trevisanuto, M Micaglio, P Ferrarese, V Zanardo ............................................................................................................................... Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F485–F489. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.038430 The laryngeal mask airway is a safe and reliable airway 2.5–5 kg.11 It has been postulated that a smaller size (0.5) could be useful in preterm management device. This review describes the insertion newborns. However, there are reports of techniques, advantages, limitations, and potential successful use of size 1 in preterm neonates applications of the laryngeal mask airway in neonates. weighing 0.8–1.5 kg.12–15 ........................................................................... (2) Fully deflate the cuff as described in the manual, and lubricate the back of the mask tip (for neonates in the labour ward, he ability to maintain a patent airway and lubrication may not be necessary, as oral provide effective positive pressure ventilation and pharyngeal secretions may reproduce T(PPV) is the main objective of neonatal this function). resuscitation and all anaesthesiological proce- (3) Press (flatten) the tip of the LMA against the dures.1–6 This is currently achieved with the use hard palate. During this manoeuvre, the of a face mask or an endotracheal tube. Both of these devices have major limitations from a operator should grasp the LMA like a pen strictly anatomical point of view and require with the index finger at the junction adequate operator skills. In certain situations, between the mask and the distal end of the both face mask ventilation and tracheal intuba- airway tube.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Closed Claims
    Looking at the past to improve A Look at the future: • Ethical considerations preclude direct, Closed Claims prospective experimentation to quantify Where and how can we improve? risks and predict outcomes associated with differences in anesthesia practice. • Prospective nonexperimental studies are prohibitively expensive for rare events, Mary Wojnakowski, CRNA, PhD such as anesthesia incidents. Associate Professor Midwestern University • Retrospective studies are therefore the Nurse Anesthesia Program norm, including examination of closed malpractice claims. Definitions: • Malpractice claim: demand for financial compensation for an injury resulting from medical care. • Closed malpractice claim: claim is dropped or ASA Closed Claims Project settled by the parties or adjudicated by the courts. • Closed Claim Analysis: closed claim file is reviewed by a practicing provider and consists of relevant hospital & medical records, narrative statement from involved healthcare personnel, expert & peer reviews, summaries of depositions, outcome reports, and cost of settlement. • Standardized form for data collection • Initiated in 1984 • Initial findings: unexpected group of claims • Currently contains approx 8000 claims (14 out of 900) that involved sudden dating back to 1962 from 35 cardiac arrest in relatively healthy patients participating insurance carriers. who had received spinal anesthesia. • Excludes claims for dental damage • Sudden appearance of bradycardia & hypotension, which rapidly progressed • Propose: improve patient safety and
    [Show full text]
  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence Guidance on Measuring Depth of Anaesthesia: Limitations of EEG-Based Technology
    Volume 110, Number 3, March 2013 British Journal of Anaesthesia 110 (3): 325–8 (2013) doi:10.1093/bja/aet006 EDITORIAL I Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bja/article/110/3/325/250090 by guest on 30 September 2021 National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidance on measuring depth of anaesthesia: limitations of EEG-based technology J. J. Pandit1* and T. M. Cook2 1 Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK 2 Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK * E-mail: [email protected] Accidental awareness during anaesthesia, especially with The available evidence on the impact of the technologies on pain and subsequent recall of the event, is a terrifying pros- reducing the likelihood of intraoperative awareness is limited. Overall, [EEG-base monitors are] not associated with a statistic- pect. A high proportion of those who experience it are ally significant reduction in intra-operative awareness in reported to go on to develop symptoms similar to post- patients classified as at higher risk ... traumatic stress disorder.1 The reported incidence of recall after general anaesthesia, as ascertained by later question- What is the anaesthetist reader (or patient) to make of these ing using the Brice questionnaire, is high, 1–2 per 1000 contemporaneous and conflicting conclusions? cases (although the majority of these do not involve painful The bodies providing these two sources of advice had very experiences, are very brief recollections, or both).2 –8 There- different remits, which may explain the opposing conclu- fore, a monitor to help the anaesthetists identify those sions. The Technology Assessment Report was a review (in- patients who are awake during surgery would be extremely cluding a meta-analysis which incorporated results of a 11 useful.
    [Show full text]
  • NAP5 Chapter 12
    CHAPTER 121 AAGAReports during of AAGA induction after ofsedation anaesthesia and transfer into theatre James H MacG Palmer Michael RJ Sury Jaideep J Pandit HEADLINE 12.1. Approximately one in five of all reports of AAGA that NAP5 received followed intended sedation rather than general anaesthesia. The rate of reports of ‘AAGA’ following sedation appears to be as high as after general anaesthesia. The experiences of those reporting AAGA after sedation and the psychological sequelae were similar in nature, though perhaps less in severity than reports of AAGA after anaesthesia. Reports of AAGA after sedation represent a failure of communication between anaesthetist and patient and should be readily reduced, or even eliminated by improved communication, management of expectations and consent processes. BACKGROUND 12.2 NAP5 focuses on patient reports of AAGA. These 12.4 Reports of AAGA after sedation imply two reports may arise when a patient has not actually things: first that the patient does not have a received general anaesthesia. It is well recognised full understanding of the intended level of that reports of AAGA may occur after sedation consciousness, and second that the level of (Samuelsson et al., 2007; Mashour, 2009; Kent, consciousness experienced was likely undesirable. 2013). In the study by Samuelsson et al., 5% of 12.5 Esaki et al. (2009) studied 117 patients undergoing patients reporting AAGA had received intended regional anaesthesia or ‘managed anaesthesia sedation. In Kent’s study of self-reports to the ASA care’, and performed a structured interview awareness registry, 27 of 83 (33%) patients who assessing expected and experienced levels of reported AAGA had received intended sedation: consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Lmas: Airway Management and Inhalant Anesthetics
    LMAsLMAs:: AirwayAirway ManagementManagement andand InhalantInhalant AnestheticsAnesthetics Wanda O.Wilson, PhD, CRNA University of Cincinnati College of Nursing Nurse Anesthesia Major LMA:LMA: HistoryHistory First described by Dr. A. Brain. Introduced in the 1980’s in UK •In US in 1992 Alternative to mask and endotracheal intubation. Estimated over 200 million surgeries performed with LMA worldwide Brain AIJ: The Laryngeal Mask – A New Concept in Airway Management. Br J Anaesth; 55:801, 1983 LMA:LMA: HistoryHistory General Safety and Efficacy of the LMA • 39,824 patients underwent GA; 11,910 (30%) airways were managed with LMA 99.8% successful placement (LMA abandoned in 23 patients) 44% underwent PPV 44 critical incidents; 18 related to airway (none serious) Verghese C & Brimacombe JR: Anesth Analg; 82:129, 1996 LMALMA UseUse inin PediatricsPediatrics Mason & Bingham. Anaesthesia; 45:760, 1990 • 200 children • Difficulties encountered in 47 cases (23%), but LMA use abandoned in only 5 cases (2.5%). • Down folding of epiglottis over laryngeal inlet identified in 8 out of 24 patients where flexible laryngoscopy was performed; clinically all had unobstructed airways. LMA:LMA: AdvantagesAdvantages Advantages over ET tube and face mask: Improved hemodynamic stability at induction & during emergence. Maintenance of airway while freeing hands & reducing fatigue of Anesthetist. Avoidance of facial nerve & eye injuries due to face mask. Decreased frequency of coughing during emergence. Decreased incidence of sore throat. DecreasedDecreased CoughingCoughing withwith LMALMA 79 patients undergoing cataract surgery, randomized to ETT or LMA. • Greater incidence of coughing prior to, during, & after extubation in ETT group. Denny & Gadeirab. J Royal Soc Med; 86:521,1993 29 patients undergoing elective eye surgery under GA randomized to ETT or LMA.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Articles Intraoperative Awareness
    REVIEW ARTICLES INTRAOPERATIVE AWARENESS: MAJOR FACTOR OR NON-EXISTENT? VARINEE LEKPRASERT*, ELIZABETH A.M. FROST** AND SOMSRI PAUSAWASDI*** Introduction Intraoperative awareness has been brought to our attention and even sensationalized often by the media over the past few years, as a major problem during anesthesia. The true incidence and the actual incidence have been questioned. Others have even questioned if the complication has been reported in order to garner sympathy at the least and financial gain at the most. Certainly the incidence of intraoperative awareness under general anesthesia is rare (0.1-0.2%)1-4 but given that some 21 million anesthetics are administered annually in the United States alone, this figure translates to an occurrence of 20,000 to 40,000 cases. Worldwide the number of cases would easily reach into the millions, especially in countries that lack the resources to administer the newer inhalational anesthetics through state-of- the art anesthetic machines. To those who have experienced anesthesia awareness, it is considered a distressing complication which can cause significant psychological sequelae including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)5. The syndrome and its sequelae have been discussed on television talk shows, and have been the topic of many articles and panels at national and international meetings. From Dept. of Anesthesiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Univ., Bangkok, Thailand. * MD, Assist. Prof. *** MD, Prof. From Dept. of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, N.Y., USA. ** MD, Prof. Correspondence: Dr. Elizabeth AM Frost, Professor of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, N.Y, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. 1201 M.E.J.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRESPONDENCE Pressure-Support Ventilation in The
    Ⅵ CORRESPONDENCE Anesthesiology 2007; 107:670 Copyright © 2007, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Pressure-support Ventilation in the Operating Room To the Editor:—I read with interest the study by Jaber et al.1 and the rhythm, and depth of breathing can be observed. Titration of anes- accompanying editorial by Tantawy and Ehrenwerth2 regarding pres- thetic agents, most notably opioids, is also facilitated. The abnormal sure-support ventilation (PSV). The Jaber study is noteworthy for ventilation/perfusion ratios that can occur during controlled ventila- documenting that the performance of PSV using modern anesthesia tion may be less likely to occur when supported spontaneous ventila- ventilators approaches the performance of an intensive care unit ven- tion is used rather than controlled mechanical ventilation. There is tilator. The editorial correctly indicates that the testing was not per- even evidence to suggest that PSV set to provide continuous positive formed under conditions of varying lung compliance and airway resis- airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure can be used in Downloaded from http://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article-pdf/107/4/678/364912/0000542-200710000-00037.pdf by guest on 03 October 2021 tance that influence the ventilation result obtained when using PSV. awake patients to prevent atelectasis during the preoxygenation pro- Nevertheless, PSV is most likely to find application in the operating cess.5 Finally, spontaneous ventilation offers the safety advantage of room for patients who can be allowed to breathe spontaneously knowing that the patient will likely continue to breathe even if an rather than for patients who present a significant ventilation chal- artificial airway should become dislodged.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Airway Management & Decision Making
    Roberts: Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine, 5th ed. CHAPTER 3 – Basic Airway Management and Decision-Making Robert F. Reardon, Phillip E. Mason, Joseph E. Clinton Over the last few decades, several important changes have occurred in emergency airway management. Bag-mask ventilation has been supplemented by intermediate, or backup, ventilation devices like the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the Combitube, and the laryngeal tube. These have become important devices for the initial resuscitation of apneic patients and for rescue ventilation when intubation fails.[1] Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) is now used in place of tracheal intubation in some critically ill patients. Despite these advances, basic techniques such as opening the airway, oxygenation, and bag-mask ventilation remain the cornerstones of good emergency airway management. [2] [3] Airway maintenance without endotracheal intubation is one of the most important emergency [4] airway management techniques to keep patients alive until a definitive airway can be established. This chapter describes basic airway skills including opening the airway, O2 therapy, NPPV, bag-mask ventilation, and intermediate ventilation devices. Because of the complexity of these skills and decisions, providers should develop a simple, organized approach to emergency airway management, being cognizant that when a specific intervention has failed, it is time to move rapidly to a different approach. Developing a simple preconceived algorithm that employs proven techniques and is applicable to a broad range of clinical scenarios will help providers manage difficult, anxiety-provoking emergency airways. THE CHALLENGE OF EMERGENCY AIRWAY MANAGEMENT Although other specialists are sometimes available, most emergency airways are managed by emergency clinicians.[5] Airway management in the emergency department (ED) is much different from airway management in the controlled setting of the operating room.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing No-Flow Time During Endotracheal Intubation Versus Placement of a Laryngeal Mask Airway During a Simulated Cardiac Arrest Scenario
    Empirical Investigations Comparing No-Flow Time During Endotracheal Intubation Versus Placement of a Laryngeal Mask Airway During a Simulated Cardiac Arrest Scenario Vincent J. Miller, MD; Introduction: Traditionally, pausing chest compressions during airway management in a cardiac arrest has been the accepted norm. However, updated American Heart Erin E. Flaherty, MD Association and the European Resuscitation Council guidelines for Advanced Cardiac Life Support emphasize reducing pauses in chest compressions, often referred to as ‘‘no-flow time,’’ to improve return of spontaneous circulation. We used simulation to evaluate whether placing a laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy would reduce no-flow times during a simulated cardiac arrest. Methods: A crossover trial of 41 respiratory therapists (RTs) performed airway man- agement in a simulated cardiac arrest. The RTs were told that bag mask ventilation was inadequate, and either an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway was needed. They were informed to request the cessation of chest compressions only if needed to complete the airway maneuver. The study was terminated when ventilation was achieved. The scenario was repeated with the same RT placing the alternative airway. Insertion time and no-flow times were recorded. Results: Neither endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy nor laryngeal mask airway placement increased no-flow time. Only 1 participant requested cessation of chest compressions during direct laryngoscopy for 2.3 seconds (P = 0.175). However, ventilation was established significantly faster with a laryngeal mask airway compared with endotracheal intubation (49.2 vs. 31.6 seconds, respectively, P G 0.001). Conclusions: We conclude that although neither device was superior to the other with respect to the primary outcome of reducing no-flow time, effective ventilation was established more rapidly with the laryngeal mask airway in the hands of the RTs who participated in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • This Procedure Includes the Following: • Endotracheal Intubation (Plus Use of Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A
    ADVANCED AIRWAY PROCEDURES This procedure includes the following: Endotracheal intubation (plus use of Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T. device), gum elastic bougie assisted tracheal intubation, video laryngoscopy) Non-Visualized Airways (Dual lumen airway, King LT-D™ Airway, Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)) Cricothyroidotomy – needle and surgical GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Rescuers must be aware of the risks and benefits of advanced airway management techniques. In cases of cardiac arrest the insertion of an advanced airway may require interruption of chest compressions for many seconds, the rescuer should weigh the need for compressions against the need for insertion of an advanced airway. Rescuers may defer insertion of an advanced airway until the patient fails to respond to initial CPR and defibrillation attempts or demonstrates return of spontaneous circulation. Providers should have a second (back-up) strategy for airway management and ventilation if they are unable to establish the first-choice airway adjunct. Bag-mask ventilation may provide that back-up strategy. ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION A. Indications for emergency endotracheal intubation are: 1. Inability of the rescuer to adequately ventilate the patient with a bag-mask device 2. The absence of airway protective reflexes (coma and cardiac arrest) B. In most case, endotracheal intubation provides definite control of the airway. Its purposes include: 1. Actively ventilating the patient 2. Delivering high concentrations of oxygen 3. Suctioning secretions and maintaining airway patency 4. Preventing aspiration of gastric contents, upper airway secretions or blood 5. Prevented gastric distention due to assisted ventilations 6. Administering positive pressure when extra fluid is present in alveoli 7. Administering medications during resuscitation for absorption through lungs as a last resort C.
    [Show full text]