DOCSLIB.ORG

Manistee River Mangement Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manistee River Mangement Plan MANISTEE RIVER MANGEMENT PLAN River Management Plan 12 January 2007 Thomas J. Rozich River Management Plan 12 January 2007 MANISTEE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN Thomas J. Rozich Introduction This plan is a companion document to the Manistee River Assessment (Rozich 1998). The river assessment describes physical characteristics and biological communities of the Manistee River as well as unique resources found within the watershed. The purpose of the assessment is to: identify opportunities and problems related to the aquatic resources and fisheries within the watershed; provide a mechanism for public comment into fisheries management decisions; and serve as a reference document for those seeking information regarding the Manistee River. The Manistee River Assessment was drafted by Fisheries Division personnel, underwent a significant period of peer and public review and comment, and was completed in June 1998. The Manistee River Assessment is a comprehensive document with a long-term focus and is intended for use by others beyond Fisheries Division; it identifies options that include items not within the responsibility of Fisheries Division. The Manistee River Management Plan is intended as a document for use by Fisheries Division with the purpose of guiding the Division’s management actions within the watershed over the short term. It is intended that the actions identified as priorities, after being weighed against other Division priorities, will appear in annual work plans. This is a working document. Therefore it will receive an annual review and update for progress made and tasks completed. Prioritization of Actions The Management Options contained within the River Assessment are consistent with the mission of Fisheries Division, which is to protect and enhance public trust in populations and habitat of fishes and other forms of aquatic life, and promote optimum use of these resources for benefit of the people of Michigan. In particular, the Division seeks to: protect and maintain healthy aquatic environments and fish communities and rehabilitate those now degraded; provide diverse public fishing opportunities to maximize the value to anglers; and foster and contribute to public and scientific understanding of fish, fishing, and fishery management (Fisheries Division 2000). Selection of Management Actions from the Management Options list is also consistent with and is guided by the objectives found in the Fisheries Division Strategic Plan (Fisheries Division 2000). Both the Management Options in the Assessment and the selection of Management Actions in the Plan follow the recommendations of Dewberry (1992). Actions that protect and restore headwater streams, riparian areas, and floodplains are give priority because the reconnection of streams and floodplains is critical to the health of the entire river system. The river system is viewed as a whole, for many important elements of fish habitat are driven by whole-system processes. Actions to protect, preserve, and rehabilitate resources take precedence over actions to improve an area or resources above and beyond the original condition. A number of mitigating factors will alter strict adherence to this order of priorities. Examples of such factors are selection of actions which may: 1 Manistee River Management Plan 12, January 2007 Fisheries Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources 1) result in very high benefit for relatively low expenditure of effort or cost; 2) leverage Fisheries Division’s resources by capitalizing on existing energy or opportunity within a specific community or segment of the watershed; 3) reflect significant outside interest or support; 4) provide the Division with an opportunity to participate in partnerships; 5) continue an ongoing project; 6) appear in another Fisheries Division plan (e.g., Lake Sturgeon Rehabilitation Strategy and Fishery Status Reports); 7) fulfill a legal requirement (e.g., FERC related actions); 8) involve public health concerns; or address concerns for threatened and endangered species. Selected Management Actions This list was developed from the Management Options section of the Manistee River Assessment. A copy of the Management Options section is attached as an appendix to this document. An individual action item may not address an entire Management Option, as many of the Options are wide in scope and long-term. Rather, an action item will accomplish a portion of a Management Option or take a short-term step towards accomplishing a long-term goal. For each selected Management Action, this Plan identifies the Management Option being addressed and gives a brief explanation of the factors considered in selecting this action as a priority. Each Action also includes a schedule for up to five years for the accomplishment of the action items. This schedule contains information required for completion of annual work plans. These Actions are listed in order of priority, with the highest priority listed first. Management Action 1 Proposed Action Review and comment on all plans that have the potential to affect or alter groundwater flows in the Manistee River watershed. Currently the Manistee River has very stable flows, ranking among the best in the country. Development that changes or affects the hydrologic cycle through land use changes, channelization, water withdrawal, dam construction, increasing the amount of impervious surface, etc., should be closely scrutinized. Management Option Category: Geology and Hydrology Option: Protect wetlands, floodplains, and sandy uplands that act as water retention areas for groundwater recharge from adverse activities. Option: Improve management of water in designated drains by working with drain commissioners on existing management. Reasons for Selection Groundwater and surface water inflows determine an aquatic community of a river. Maintaining natural discharge patterns is critical to maintaining healthy biological communities, and controlling pollution and erosion. In order to achieve this management objective, Fisheries Division should: 1) provide the Department of Environmental Quality expert advice and alternatives regarding Section 301 and 303 permit applications that could potentially degrade the Manistee River watershed hydrologic cycle; 2 Manistee River Management Plan 12, January 2007 Fisheries Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources 2) provide expert advice to the Pine and Upper Manistee Natural rivers zoning review boards regarding requests for variances that could affect the hydrologic cycle; 3) collaborate with and support environmental or watershed groups such as the Conservation Resource Alliance, Huron Pines Resource Council & Development, Inc., Upper Manistee River Association, Pine River Association, and Trout Unlimited with their efforts to preserve the natural hydrological cycle; 4) when funding becomes available, hire a Watershed Specialist to assist Fisheries staff with DEQ application responses, Natural Rivers Zoning Board issues, collaboration with local environmental groups, and public relations. Schedule Year 2006–2010, inclusive Personnel days: Unit manager 3 days; three management biologists 3 days each Special needs: None Discretionary dollars: None Management Action 2 Proposed Action Review and comment on all Department of Environmental Quality permit applications to promote natural methods of bank stabilization, ensure wise development, and protect wetlands. Management Option Category: Geology and Hydrology Option: Protect wetlands, floodplains, and sandy uplands that act as water retention areas for groundwater recharge from adverse activities. Management Option Category: Biological Communities Option: Preserve and protect wetlands within the floodplain of the watershed, with no mitigation that would increase fragmentation of the floodplain. Reason for Selection To protect and maintain healthy aquatic environments and stable flows. In order to achieve this management objective, Fisheries Division should: 1) provide the Department of Environmental Quality expert advice and alternatives regarding Section 301 and 303 permit applications that could potentially degrade the Manistee River watershed hydrologic cycle; 2) when funding becomes available, hire a Watershed Specialist to assist fisheries staff with DEQ application responses, Natural Rivers Zoning Board issues, collaboration with local environmental groups and public relations. Schedule Year 2006–2010, inclusive Personnel days: Unit manager 3 days; three management biologists 15 days each 3 Manistee River Management Plan 12, January 2007 Fisheries Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Management Action 3 Proposed Action Assist the City of Manton to obtain funding for an engineering feasibility study to put Cedar (Manton) Creek into a natural channel, create an off-line pond, and remove the old dam structure. In August 2000, the City of Manton council unanimously passed a resolution supporting this action. Management Option Category: Channel Morphology and Dams Barriers Option: Restore high gradient areas by removing hydroelectric (Tippy and Hodenpyl) and other dams, especially those no longer being used or serving little purpose (Manton Millpond, Copemish, and Goose Creek dams). Management Option Category: Biological Communities Option: Rehabilitate fragmented segments of the river system by removing dams and barriers. Reasons for Selection Restore degraded fish habitat and improve summer water temperatures for coldwater species below the dam. In order to achieve this management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Big Manistee River Tributaries As Potential Arctic Grayling Habitat
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2014 Big Manistee River Tributaries as Potential Arctic Grayling Habitat Brian M. Danhoff Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Copyright 2014 Brian M. Danhoff Recommended Citation Danhoff, Brian M., "Big Manistee River Tributaries as Potential Arctic Grayling Habitat", Master's Thesis, Michigan Technological University, 2014. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/744 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons BIG MANISTEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES AS POTENTIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING HABITAT By Brian M. Danhoff A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Biological Sciences MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Brian Danhoff This thesis has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Biological Sciences Department of Biological Sciences Thesis Advisor: Dr. Casey J. Huckins Committee Member: Dr. Nancy A. Auer Committee Member: Dr. Brian D. Barkdoll Department Chair: Chandrashekhar P. Joshi Table of Contents List of Figures ...................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Trout and Salmon Stocking in Lake Michigan 1976-2002
    Lake Michigan Committee Meeting Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 19-20, 2003 Summary of Trout and Salmon Stocking in Lake Michigan 1976-2002 Prepared by Jessica M. Richards and Charles R. Bronte U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fishery Resources Office 2661 Scott Tower Drive New Franken, WI 54229 This report summarizes trout and salmon stocking in Lake Michigan from 1976-2002. Stocking information was provided by the Department of Natural Resources of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin, who stock Pacific salmon, brown trout, and splake, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who provides all lake trout for restoration purposes. These data should be considered provisional because not all agencies have officially verified the stocking numbers. With the exception of lake trout, no attempt was made to express stocking totals in yearling equivalents. Consequently, numbers for all life stages stocked for a given species were added together. To accurately examine trends in adult trout and salmon abundance in Lake Michigan, detailed information on hatchery programs, genetic strains, size at stocking, and stocking practices would have to be considered. Lakewide Trends: The number of trout and salmon stocked into Lake Michigan in 2002 totaled 12.0 million fish (Table 1), which was about 1.0 million fewer fish than last year. This level of stocking was 2.4 million less than the long term average of 14.5 million, and one of the lowest levels since 1977. Total stocking peaked at 17.3 million fish in 1984. Chinook Salmon: Chinook salmon stocking in Lake Michigan decreased to 3.3 million fish in 2002, which was about 1.0 million fewer fish than last year (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Manistee City
    Manistee City 5-Year Recreation Harbor Plan Prepared by: Manistee County Planning Department - Winter 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………...…………………...….3 Lake Michigan Zone…………………………………………………………………..…….…5 Manistee River Channel Zone…………………………….………….…………….…..…8 Manistee Lake Zone…………………………..……………….………….……………..……11 Sites Development Plan……………..…………………………….…………………..……13 Marketing, Events and Partnerships.……………………….…………………..……18 Annual Maintenance Schedule…..…………………………….………….………….…19 Maintenance/Replacement Schedule…………………….…………………..….…20 Supporting Documentation/Agencies………………….…………………..…....…21 Contact Information…………………………………………………………………..….….22 Harbor Plan 2 ​ City of Manistee, Michigan - Harbor Plan ​ Executive Summary Name of Facilities The Manistee Municipal Harbor is located on Lake Michigan within a thirty mile radius of Ludington to the South and Frankfort to the North. The City of Manistee is a historical city branded the ‘Victorian Port City’ with a robust Historic District and Commission. The ornate victorian architectural infrastructure and mystique stems from the vigorous industry and subsequent wealth from the late 1800’s. Industry has since transitioned from lumber to manufacturing utilizing railroad transportation and shipping corridors as major modes of transportation. The Manistee City Municipal Marina is a City owned and operated property. This is located on the Harbor and within walking distance to sandy Lake Michigan beaches, playgrounds, restaurants, shops, grocery and hardware stores, theaters, free summer concerts, museum and the library. One of the best features of the Manistee Municipal Marina and Riverwalk is the fact it is handicap accessible, allowing everyone to enjoy it. There are ramps at both ends of the Riverwalk including at First Street Beach and next to the US-31 bridge. Three main bodies of water directly affect the City. The Western boundary of the City is Lake Michigan which the City owns and maintains approximately one mile of beach front for recreational use.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Manistee River, Lake County
    Michigan Department of Natural Resources 2005-08 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Little Manistee River Lake County, T20N, R14W, Sec. 24, 25 and T19N, R13W, Sec. 5 and T20N, R14W, Sec. Surveyed August, 2002; August, 2003; and August, 2004 Mark A. Tonello Environment The Little Manistee River watershed drains 145,280 acres in Lake, Mason, and Manistee counties (Wicklund and Dean 1957; Figure 1). The Little Manistee River originates from several swamps in eastern Lake County about eight miles east of the Village of Luther. Below Luther Dam it flows northwest through most of Lake County, the very northeast tip of Mason County, and then southwestern Manistee County (Figure 2). Below the Luther Dam, the Little Manistee River is free- flowing for 55 miles before entering Manistee Lake in the Village of Stronach. Manistee Lake empties into Lake Michigan through a channel in the town of Manistee. The majority of the Little Manistee River watershed is forested with northern hardwoods and conifers. Soils consist mostly of deep, permeable sand, although there are a few areas with loamy soils and some with wet soils. Several large wetland complexes exist in the watershed; one of note is the Baylor Swamp from which both branches of Twin Creek flow. Much of the river between Luther and M-37 flows through lowland conifer and tag-alder swamp. Land use in the watershed is primarily forest and rural residential. Upstream of M-37, about half of the land through which the river flows is public, owned by the state of Michigan as part of the Pere Marquette State Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Get Closer to Nature Enjoy Michigan’S Rivers and Natural Woodlands
    GET CLOSER TO NATURE ENJOY MICHIGAN’S RIVERS AND NATURAL WOODLANDS. A LITTLE WILD, A LOT WONDERFUL CONSUMERS ENERGY GET CLOSER TO NATURE • 1 GET CLOSER TO NATURE A LITTLE WILD, A LOT WONDERFUL xperience the best nature has to offer. Whether it’s a leisurely bike ride or hike through miles Eof pine forests with hardly another human passerby. Built and operated by Consumers Rogers Hydro Energy since the early 1900s, the 12,000 acres of land and water at our 13 hydro- electric dams offer many recreational opportunities: Au Sable River Mio • Fishing or camping. Alcona • Picnicking and swimming. Manistee River Cooke • Canoeing and seeing a deer take a Hodenpyl PAGE Foote PAGE drink at the edge of the water. Five Channels • Catching sight of a bald eagle soaring Tippy 6 Loud high above its nest or a family of 4 trumpeter swans gliding silently across Muskegon River the water. Hardy • Viewing Michigan’s fall foilage along Rogers PAGE the brilliantly colorful landscape. Croton Consumers Energy works with town- 8 ship, county, state and federal govern- ment officials, plus many volunteer Grand River PAGE organizations and private businesses to provide access to the clear water and Webber cool forests. 10 So grab the family, hop in the car and Kalamazoo River enjoy Michigan’s rivers and natural Allegan PAGE woodlands today. (Calkins Bridge) Let your family experience something a 10 little wild, but a lot wonderful. YOUR SAFETY IS A PRIORITY. See page 15 for tips. CONSUMERS ENERGY GET CLOSER TO NATURE • 3 MANISTEE RIVER Known locally as the “Big Manistee,” so as not to be confused with its smaller southern neighbor, the Little Manistee River, the Manistee River stretches about 170 miles from its headwaters near Alba to Manistee Lake and then Lake Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Manistee Case Study
    THE CITY OF A CASE STUDY {MANISTEE Michigan Coastal Community Working Waterfronts A CASE STUDY THE CITY OF MANISTEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Michigan Coastal Community FELLOWSHIP MENTORS Working Waterfronts Mark Breederland, Michigan Sea Grant Extension Emily Finnell, Office of the Great Lakes NOAA FELLOWSHIP ADVISORY COMMITTEE This case study was compiled as part of a set of 11 working Jon Allan Richard Norton John Warbach waterfront case studies in coastal communities. For more Dave Knight Chuck Pistis Ronda Wuycheck information on the series, please see the Introduction, Carol Linteau Jennifer Read Lynelle Marolf Frank Ruswick Value and Context, Waterfront Land Use, Best Practices, and Recommendations and Next Steps sections. OFFICE OF THE GREAT LAKES AND SEA GRANT STAFF OTHER CASE STUDIES IN THIS SERIES: PREPARED BY Alpena Monroe Saugatuck Elizabeth Durfee Charlevoix Muskegon Sault Ste. Marie 2011-2013 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Manistique Ontonagon Zone Management Fellowship with the Michigan Coastal Zone Marquette Port Huron Management Program and Michigan Sea Grant. Cover photos: U.S. Coast Guard, Elizabeth Durfee, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. June 2013 | MICHU-13-730 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..............................................................4 FIGURES AND TABLES Summary .................................................................5 Figure 1. tate of Michigan and Manistee County and aerial image of the City of Context ...................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Boom to Bankruptcy the Story of the Manistee and Northeastern Railroad
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 1-1965 Boom to Bankruptcy the Story of the Manistee and Northeastern Railroad Donald Stroup Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Stroup, Donald, "Boom to Bankruptcy the Story of the Manistee and Northeastern Railroad" (1965). Master's Theses. 3387. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3387 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOM TO BANKRUPTCY THE STORY OF THE MANISTEE AND NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD by Donald Stroup A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan January, 1965 WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVRSITY LIBRARY KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN 49001 Page 1 of 71 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS iii INTRODUCTION 1 BIJCKLEY AND DOUGLAS 4 WHY WAS THE MANISTEE AND NORTH EASTERN RAILROAD BUILT? 8 PROBLEMS OF CONSTRUCTION AND RIGHI' OF WAY 17 FULL SERVICE BEGINS 25 CIVILIZING AND SETTLING EFFECTS 30 RUGGLES VS. BUCKLEY 42 TIIE LAST YEARS 52 APPENDIX 62 BIBLIOGRAPHY 6' ii Page 2 of 71 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Page M. & N. E. R. R. Bridge Across the Manistee River, Manistee, Michigan – 1888 16 M.&N.E Locomotive No. 2 26 Locomotive No • 9 26 Engine No.
    [Show full text]
  • Manistee River Watershed Is Not Available
    Manistee River Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Manistee River Assessment is one of a series being prepared by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, for river basins in Michigan. This assessment described fisheries and related resources, identifies issues that are of concern to fishery managers, and outlines management options to address those issues. The assessment provides an organized approach to identifying opportunities and solving problems. It provides a mechanism for public involvement in management decisions, allowing citizens to learn, participate, and help determine decisions. It also provides an organized reference for Fisheries Division personnel, other agencies, and citizens who need information about a particular aspect of the river system. The document consists of four main sections: introduction, assessment, management options, and public comment and response. The assessment is the nucleus of the document. Physical, biological, and cultural characteristics of the watershed are described under twelve sections: geography, history, biological communities, geology and hydrology, channel morphology, soils and land use patterns, special jurisdictions, recreational use, dams and barriers, water quality, fisheries management, and citizen involvement. Management options are provided. These options are consistent with the mission statement of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division and convey four approaches to correcting problems in a watershed. These include options to protect and preserve existing resources, options requiring additional surveys, opportunities for rehabilitation of degraded resources, and opportunities to improve areas or resources beyond existing conditions. Options are related primarily to aquatic communities; but wildlife, botanical, and social factors are noted where they are important and directly affect aquatic communities. Some options are simple, but most are complex, sometimes involving management of the entire watershed and taking many years to accomplish.
    [Show full text]
  • Manistee River Projects (2 Developments)
    Manistee River, Michigan MANISTEE RIVER TIPPY HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2580) HODENPYL HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2599) These two projects on the Manistee River are part of the Settlement Agreement filed on December 7, 1992 that includes a total of 11 projects (3 on the Muskegon, 6 on the Au Sable and 2 on the Manistee River). A. SUMMARY 1. License Issued: July 15, 1994 2. Expiration: June 30, 2034 3. Waterway: Manistee River 4. Capacity: Total for two projects 37.1 MW (megawatts) (Hodenpyl- 17 MW, Tippy- 20.1 MW) 5. Licensee: Consumers Power Company (Now Consumers Energy) 6. Counties: Tippy – Manistee County, MI Hodenpyl – Manistee & Wexford Counties, MI 7. Federal Lands: Manistee National Forest 8. Brief Project Descriptions: a. Tippy (P-2580) Two existing earth embankment dam sections An impoundment with storage area of 1,100 acre-feet A powerhouse containing 3 generating units Transmission facilities, and appurtenant facilities Stronach Dam, on the tributary Pine River which flows into the mainstem Tippy impoundment b. Hodenpyl (P-2599) Two existing earth embankment dam sections An existing impoundment with a storage area of 1,665 acre-feet A powerhouse containing 2 generating units Transmission facilities, and appurtenant facilities 9. Settlement Agreement: Filed with FERC Dec 1992; SA includes a total of 11 projects (3 on the Muskegon, 6 on the Au Sable and 2 on the Manistee River) 10. Parties to SA: a. Consumers Power d. National Park Service (NPS) b. U.S. Forest Service (FS) e. Michigan Department of Natural c. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resources (MI DNR) (FWS) Page 1 of 6 Manistee River, Michigan f.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Bajema Michigan History Collection Collection 488
    Finding aid for the Carl Bajema Michigan History collection Collection 488 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on August 08, 2019. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Grand Rapids Public Library, Grand Rapids History and Special Collections Department 111 Library Street NE Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 [email protected] URL: http://www.grpl.org Finding aid for the Carl Bajema Michigan History collection Collection 488 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical ................................................................................................................................ 3 Scope and Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Subject Volumes
    [Show full text]
  • MICHIGAN LOG MARKS" the R~C, Viiaj ~ Eoituftuj $~ Oj A1~'4
    ~ , /~~;~:r~~ / /\ J ,Mla.H-I SA,N _ .. _._l.-,~_.~ ... _-.;- -~;': -..,,-') , ..\ __ \. \ . x~ '-~C~(·~~ M'A1\~,5 • '- ,,/::\..,• .... -f-.--=::.;...--( /" ..-< '>< ., ,\\ ' /' "'_ .. , >L~._j __ -'\---\- .........; ,/' '., '. '¥' \0 :::-- \ -\ ",,,," ~. I ,. / i----- ~_ ~1/ . / I \. '\ " \ \ i ~ . ~ \\ (~i ~ ~ : l ~\ " " \ !: ~ J , Issued November 194 I; First Reprinting, January 1942 \ __ ... - ~ ~ "~. • ~ I ~ .. :. ,:'-,J." . .. ... ~- - .. _. FOREWORD MICHIGAN'S early history and development, as well as that of adjacent states, was influenced materially by the industry that utilized the timber resources of the state. Much of' the wealth in the forest was extracted quickly by the lumber industry, supplying work to the pioneer, in addition to capital and building material to develop farms and villages. Log marks were an essential part of that lum­ ber industry. They were the outposts of law and order in pioneering communities where social controls were often weak. Stamped on a log, they carri~d the inviolate right of ownership of property on every stream and pond in north­ ern Michigan. Michigan has harvested most of its virgin timber crop, but it will not be many years, as ~ measured in the life of a state, before logging .t:~ and milling again will be a common sight and ~ an important part of the state's economy. While ~ the log mark will never return to occupy the ~ important role it once did, it undoubtedly will ~ -c: always be called upon in various ways to iden­ ~ tify raw forest products. A permanent record of log marks and of the industry that uses them is highly desirable. Hence, Michigan State College gladly accepted sponsorship of the WPA Writers' Project for this state-wide study and herewith publishes the results.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Manistee River: Kalkaska, Missaukee and Wexford Counties
    Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources 2018-250 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Manistee River (Middle) Wexford, Missaukee, Kalkaska Counties Manistee River Watershed, last surveyed 2016 Mark A. Tonello Environment The Manistee River is located in the northwestern part of Michigan's Lower Peninsula, and is one of the largest watersheds in Michigan. It is approximately 232 miles in length and drains an area of approximately 1,780 square miles (Rozich 1998). The watershed encompasses sections of ten different counties, including Antrim, Otsego, Crawford, Kalkaska, Missaukee, Grand Traverse, Wexford, Osceola, Lake, and Manistee. The Manistee River begins as springs emanating from cedar swamps in southeastern Antrim County. From there, it flows south through southwestern Otsego County and northwestern Crawford County. Shortly after flowing under M-72, the Manistee River turns to the southwest and enters Kalkaska County. It continues on a southwest course through Kalkaska, Missaukee, and Wexford Counties. Shortly after entering Manistee County, the river turns essentially due west and flows into Manistee Lake, and then into Lake Michigan. This report will focus on the reach of the Manistee River from the Sharon area of Kalkaska County downstream to the Mesick area of Wexford County (Figures 1-4). This reach is approximately 83.6 river miles in length and is commonly known as the Middle Manistee River. The Middle Manistee River is much less well-known than either the Lower Manistee River below Tippy and Hodenpyl Dams (Tonello 2004a and 2004b) or the Upper Manistee River, upstream from Sharon. The Upper Manistee River provides cold water temperatures and robust wild trout populations, while the Lower Manistee River (below Tippy Dam) supports world-renowned runs of Chinook Salmon and Steelhead.
    [Show full text]