40648-033: Infrastructure Development Investment Program

Initial Environment Examination

Project Number: 40648-033 January 2014

IND: Infrastructure Development Investment Program for Tourism – Tranche 2

Submitted by

Government of Uttarakhand, Dehrdaun

This report has been submitted to ADB by the Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2011). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB.

Response Matrix

Initial Environmental Examination 1. Amelioration of Lake Naukuchiatal, Uttarakhand 2. Building and Environmental Upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House, Uttarakhand Sr. No. as per From ADB Remarks/Response suggestion/ Comments from ADB 2 We note that there are no changes in the scope of Agreed works originally approved (ADB approved IEE At TA stage DPR was not prepared; IEE report of November 2011), and the submission of was developed on the basis of updated IEE reports is to ensure compliance with conceptual design. Now revised IEE is the agreed environmental safeguards related developed considering specific project arrangements for the Loan. components as pointed out in detailed design report and complying loan covenant 3 Based on the desk review of the information No deviation. Revised IEE reports provided with the updated IEE reports and the IEE indicate categorization of the project as report of November 2011; the environment “B” as per level of impact category of the sub-projects continues to be “B”, and the sub projects are eligible for financing under the Loan from environmental safeguards perspective.

4 We note from the IEE reports that all sub-projects No project components are selected are outside the boundaries of environmentally within environmental sensitive area sensitive areas such as national parks, sanctuaries, etc., and the proposed activities are in line with the approved conservation /development plans of the relevant regulatory agencies.

5 During our desk review, we noted that certain In 2011 TA stage IEE report was environmental impacts (and associated mitigation prepared for entire program considering and monitoring measures) identified for these sub- number of sub projects and mitigation projects in the ADB approved IEE report were measures were developed in generic missing in the updated IEE reports. It is likely that way, not as per specific work on account of certain other initiatives undertaken components, locations and specific sub during the past 24 months, since the approval of projects. earlier IEE report (not referred to in these IEE Now IEE is revised as per specific work reports), these impacts no longer exist. We components (which is supposed to be request you to provide a rationale for not revised again in form of “site specific considering these impacts (and associated EMP”) and that’s the reason of deviation mitigation and monitoring measures) at this stage, from earlier generic mitigation especially when the scope has remained measures against impacts. unchanged.

Sr. No. as per From ADB Remarks/Response suggestion/ Comments from ADB As per suggestion mitigation measures under EMP reviewed once again and revised wherever required 6 The public consultation section requires to be During preparation of IEE (design strengthened by providing details of consultations stage) consultation has been carried with local people. The section should elaborate on out with primary and secondary (i) whether the environmental assessment, either stakeholders. During consultation draft IEE reports of the anticipated impacts and project components, possible impacts proposed mitigation measures (in local language) and mitigation measures were were shared with the local community prior to explained in local Hindi language consultations; (ii) the issues raised by locals during the meetings; and (iii) the methodology Issues raised by locals have been adopted to incorporate those issues in the final considered for development of design. Form the details furnished, it appears that mitigation measures and action plan. the majority of consultations have been with local government officials. Some of the photo plates Further local level community attached with IEE reports are the same. A consultation particularly related to clarification should be included in those IEE environmental attributes attached in the reports stating that the stakeholders including revised IEE report. Additional local communities are the same for such sub- photographs are included in the revised projects. It is also not very clear whether the IEE report. reports or summaries (after incorporating the consultation discussions) in local language have After approval executive summaries of been shared with local people or disclosed at the IEE will be translated to local Hindi easily accessible places. language and will be disclosed to program website, local offices, line agencies and public places like libraries/ village panchyat office/ ULBs 7 We request you to ensure that

(i) Statutory regulations of India at the national. State Complied and to be comply as per loan and local levels are complied with; the relevant covenant. clearances, consents, permissions, etc. are All will be reflected in quarterly and obtained prior to commencement of works; the semiannual report terms and conditions stipulated therein are fully complied with; and the relevant clearances, consents, permissions are renewed in timely manner.

(ii) All proposed improvement or augmentation Complied and to be comply as per loan measures in environmentally sensitive areas are covenant. in accordance with the respective regulatory All will be reflected in quarterly and authority approved management plans; semiannual report

Sr. No. as per From ADB Remarks/Response suggestion/ Comments from ADB (iii) The permissions are obtained from the relevant Obtained as per requirement/ selection regulatory agencies for the sub-projects in or close of project components location to protected monuments;

(iv) The environmental budget mentioned in the IEE Environmental budget for monitoring report is included in the overall sub-project cost and application of mitigation measures and made available during implementation and O&M phases;

(v) The environmental management and monitoring Environmental management and plans are made a part of the bidding documents monitoring plans is attached in BID (stating that the associated IEE reports could be document. Entire IEE is available for made available to interested bidders and/or by observation by contractor. Revised and providing a web link of disclosed IEE report); and approve IEE will be disclosed in web subsequently in the works contracts; site

(vi) The contractors and other agencies responsible Will be complying by concerned for the implementation of EMMPs understand the contractor as per EMMP. environmental safeguards related requirements Monitoring report will show level of agreed under the sub-project; compliance

(vii) The proposed bio-manipulation activities in the As per BID condition Works under Naukuchiatal lake would be carried out in Supply of “Permanent Equipment” for consultation with the concerned regulatory Bio-Manipulation of Naukuchiatal Lake authorities and the agencies with expertise in the (Schedule II) and Operation of Bio subject; Manipulation work for three (3) years (Schedule IV) shall be executed by the nominated Agency, College of Fisheries, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Dist. Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand.* (viii) In case of any unanticipated environmental risks Agreed. or impacts or in case of any changes in the scope In case of changes in scope and of subproject during implementation, you shall location IEE will be revised and to be promptly inform ADB about such risks, impacts or send to ADB for review and approval. changes; and prior to commencing with works in All will be reflected in quarterly and such sections, undertake environmental semiannual report assessment for further revision of IEE reports as deemed necessary, and submit to ADB for review and approval.

*comment and response for only Amelioration of Lake Naukuchiatal project

Environmental Assessment Document

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Loan Number: 2833 IND

Revised January 2014

Infrastructure Development Investment Programme for Tourism, Uttarakhand

Subproject – Building and Environmental Upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House, Uttarakhand

Prepared by the Government of Uttarakhand for the Asian Development Bank

This IEE is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank BOD - Biological Oxygen Demand BoQ - Bill of Quantities CO - Carbon monoxide CPCB - Central Pollution Control Board DSC - Design and Supervision Consultant EA - Executing Agency EAC - Expert Appraisal Committee EARF - Environment Assessment and Review Framework EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environment Management Plan ES - Environmental Specialist GC - General Conditions GoI - Government of India GoUK - Government of Uttarakhand IDIPT - Infrastructure Development Investment Program for Tourism IEE - Initial environmental examination INR - Indian Rupee IPIU - Investment Program Implementation Unit IPMU - Investment Program Management Unit KMVN Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam PUC - Pollution Under Control Certificate MLD - Million Liters per day MoEF - Ministry of Environment and Forests MFF - Multi- Trench Financing Facility NGO - Non-Governmental Organization NOx - Nitrogen oxide PD - Project Director PIU - Project Implementation Unit PM - Particulate Matter PMU - Project Management Unit RP - Resettlement Plan RPM - Respirable Particulate Matter SC - Scheduled Castes SEAC - State Expert Appraisal Committee SO2 - Sulphur dioxide SPM - Suspended Particulate Matter SPS - Safeguards Policy Statement ST - Scheduled Tribe

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. The Infrastructure Development Investment Program for Tourism (IDIPT) envisages an environmentally and culturally sustainable and socially inclusive tourism development, in the project states of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand, delivered through a multi-tranche financing facility (MFF) modality. Project 2 includes the states of Uttarakhand and Tamil Nadu.

2. This Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) has been prepared for the “Building and Environmental Upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House” at Utttarakhand under Tranche 2. The IEE has been prepared based on the primary, secondary data, field visits, reconnaissance survey and public and stake holder's consultations.

3. The subproject is needed to strengthen the tourism potential of this area as this site is very popular among local visitors, nature lovers, bird watchers and other interest groups.

4. The proposed subproject mainly comprises of (i) Restoration and Refurbishment of Heritage Guest House; (ii) Repair and Refurbishment of Eureka Forbes Buildings; (iii) Construction of new restaurant with central kitchen; (iv) Construction of new staff accommodation (v) Landscaping of TRH Parichay site at Lake Edge and Service Area.

5. Construction of all elements will begin in the 2nd quarter of the year 2014, and work will be completed in 2015. Total implementation period is 18 months.

6. The subproject has been categorized as B as per the ADB‘s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009). The subproject is not covered in the ambit of the EIA notification 2006 and EIA Act 2009. As a result, the categorization, and the subsequent environmental assessment and clearance requirements, either from the state or the Government is not triggered.

7. As a part of IEE, a detailed impact assessment covering impacts due to location, design and pre-construction, construction, operation and maintenance have been assessed. The project will lead to marginal impacts on lake water quality due to disposal of sewage, construction waste, etc. But mitigation measures will be applied to minimize the impact.

8. The proposed sub-project envisages restoration and refurbishment of Parichay Tourist Rest House. These measures will restore and renovate the 19th century heritage house in order to enhance its heritage attributes, an attraction for informed clients and heritage lovers, tap into the potential of its natural setting by creating opportunities for recreational activities such as walking trail and sit outs to attract nature lovers to the site, develop visitor services such as restaurant, outdoor, cafe, as assets for the site which will generate additional revenue and attract locals and well as visitors passing through the area, improve the occupancy of the heritage house, staff building (Eureka Forbes), outdoor tents by upgrading and refurbishing the interiors in order to provide better standard of living for visitors.

9. An Environmental Management plan (EMP) outlining the specific environmental measures to be adhered to during various phases of implementation of the subproject has been prepared. The subproject will conform to all Government regulations, policies, and standards, as well as Asian Development Bank‘s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009)

10. A stakeholder discussion has been conducted. The project design incorporates the views of primary and secondary stakeholders including local communities and local officials who were all meaningfully consulted during IEE and project preparation

11. The environmental impacts of the project are therefore not significant and at Category B level, as per ADB's Safeguards Policy Statement. The specific measures stated in the EMP will address all adverse environmental impacts due to the subproject. Impacts are readily mitigated through careful siting, specific selection criteria for procuring contractors with 3

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand demonstrated experience; execution of proven mitigation measures during the design; and adoption of good engineering practices during construction and implementation. A detailed monitoring plan prepared as part of this IEE will further mitigate negative environmental impacts during implementation

12. A Project Management Unit (PMU) is established in Dehradun for the overall project management and Project Implementation Units (PIU) is also established at Bhimtal. A Safeguards Specialist within the PMU will be responsible for implementation of the resettlement and environmental safeguard provisions. Project Management Consultants (PMC) and Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC) provide assistance to the PMU/PIUs in project implementation. Within the PMC team a Safeguards Specialist will provide overall management of environmental and social issues, and will provide technical support to the PMU including implementation of the environmental and resettlement issues according to ADB’s requirements, and assist in monitoring impacts and mitigation measures associated with sub- projects. The Safeguards Specialist of the DSC team will be responsible for preparation of the Environmental Assessment documents in line with the EARF and supervise the implementation of the EMP provisions in the various sub-projects.

13. The DSC Safeguards Specialist will support environmental management functions including updating sub-project IEEs in respect to environmental management plans, assisting in preparing IEEs, and assist in monitoring impacts and mitigation measures associated with sub- projects. He/she will be required to include mitigation measures in designs where appropriate, and to specify other measures in construction contracts. Contractors will be required by their contracts to implement all specified mitigation, monitoring, and reporting assigned to contractors as presented in sub-project IEE.

14. The subproject is unlikely to cause significant adverse impacts. The potential adverse impacts that are associated with design, construction, and operation can be mitigated to standard levels without difficulty through proper engineering design and the incorporation or application of recommended mitigation measures and procedures. Based on the findings of the IEE, the classification of the Project as Category “B” is confirmed, and no further special study or detailed EIA needs to be undertaken to comply with ADB SPS (2009) or GoI EIA Notification (2006).

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

CONTENTS

S. Chapter Page No. No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 I Introduction 7 A. Background 7 B. Purpose of the IEE 7 C. Environmental Regulatory Compliance 7 D. Report Structure 9

II Description of Project Components 10 A. Project Overview 10 B. Present Status 10 C. Project Components 11 D. Project Implementation Schedule 11

III Description of Existing Environment 12 A. Environmental Profile – Physical Resources 12 B. Ecological Resources and Biodiversity 14 C. Economic Resources 16 D. Social and Cultural Resources 18

IV Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 20 A. Land Acquisition and Resettlement 20 B. Environmental Impacts 20

V Environmental Management Plan 31 A. Institutional Arrangements 31 B. Environment Management 32 C. Environmental Monitoring Plan 34 D. Capacity Building 35 E. Environmental Budget 37 F. Environmental Monitoring and Reporting 39

VI. Public Consultation and Information Disclosure 40 A. Consultation Process 40 B. Future Consultation and Information Disclosure 41 C. Grievance Redress Mechanism 42

VII Findings & Recommendations 44

VIII Conclusions 44

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

List of Tables

Table Description Page No. No.

1. Environmental Regulatory Compliance for Upgradation of 8 Tourist facilities at TRH Parichay in Nainital District 2. Quality of water at Naukuchiatal 13 3. Fish Biodiversity in Naukuchiatal Lake 15 4. Ambient Air Quality (24 hours basis) 16 5. Ambient Noise Quality at Naukuchiatal area 16 6. List of Hotels/Guest houses in the vicinity of the project area 18 7. Demographic profile of Nainital District 18 8. Demographic profile of project area villages 18 9. Basic Amenities of Project Area 18 10. Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 26 11. Environmental Monitoring Plan 34 12. Training Modules for Environmental Management Consultations 36 13. withEnvir Stakeonmentalholders Budget 38 14. Consultations with Stakeholders 40

List of Annexures

Annexure No. Description Page no. 1. Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist 45 2. Location Map 49 3. Photographs of TRH Parichay Project Area 50 4. NOC from KMVN 51 5. Water Quality, Ambient Air Quality, Noise Level Monitoring 52 Report 6. Public Consultation Photographs 60 7. Public Consultation on 04-06-2013 62 8. Public Consultation on 20-12-2013 65 9. NOC from KMVN- Resettlement of Employees 70

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

I. INTRODUCTION A. Background

1. The India Inclusive Tourism Infrastructure Development Project (IITIDP) envisages an environmentally and culturally sustainable and socially inclusive tourism development, in the project states of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand. The expected Impact of the Project in the four states is sustainable and inclusive tourism development in priority State tourism sub circuits divided into marketable cluster destinations that exhibit enhanced protection and management of key natural and cultural heritage tourism sites, improved market connectivity, enhanced destination and site environment and tourist support infrastructure, and enhanced capacities for sustainable destination and site development with extensive participation by the private sector and local communities.

2. The proposed subproject mainly comprises of- (i) Restoration and Refurbishment of Heritage Guest House; (ii) Repair and Refurbishment of Eureka Forbes Buildings; (iii) Construction of new restaurant with central kitchen; (iv) Construction of new staff accommodation (v) Landscaping of TRH Parichay site at Lake Edge and Service Area. Construction of all elements will begin in the last quarter of the year 2013, and work will be completed in the second quarter of 2015. Total implementation period is 18 months.

3. As per the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Environmental Assessment Guidelines, and in line with the Environment Assessment and Review Framework (EARF) for the project, all the sub-project components for the proposed works are categorized as ‘B’ and an Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) prepared. This Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) assesses the environmental impacts due to the proposed Building and Environmental upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House and specifies measures towards addressing the impacts. The IEE was based on a review of sub-project site plans and reports; field visits, collection of primary and secondary data to characterize the environment and identify potential impacts; and interviews and discussions with stakeholders.

4. Based on the findings of the IEE, an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been prepared, outlining the specific environmental measures to be adhered to during various phases implementation of the sub project. This EMP forms part of the contract document, and shall enable integration of environmental provisions / management measures in the Contract Document.

B. Purpose of IEE

5. The present proposal is aimed at Building and Environmental upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House. The environmental impacts due to this subproject are mostly related to the location of the site, construction impacts and Operation & Maintenance as well. Therefore, as per the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Environmental Assessment Guidelines, the subproject components are categorized as ‘B’ and this IEE has been carried out. This IEE provides mitigation measures for impacts related to location and design, construction, operation, and maintenance.

C. Environmental Regulatory Compliance

6. The realm of environmental regulations and mandatory requirements for the proposed 7

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand subproject is shown in Table 1. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notification, 2006 by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF, GoI) specifies the mandatory environmental clearance requirements. Accordingly, all projects and activities are broadly categorized into two categories1 - Category A and Category B, based on the spatial extent of potential impacts and potential impacts on human health and natural and man-made resources. Given that the sub-project is not covered in the ambit of the EIA notification, Environment clearance requirements from the GoI are not triggered.

Table 1: Environmental Regulatory Compliance for Building and Environmental Upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House in Nainital District Applicability of Acts/Guidelines Compliance Criteria The EIA notification, 2006 (and its These sub-projects are not covered in the ambit of the EIA subsequent amendments in 2009) notification as they are not covered either under Category A or provides for categorization of projects Category B of the notification. As a result, the categorization, and into category A and B, based on extent the subsequent environmental assessment and clearance of impacts. requirements, either from the state or the GoI is not triggered. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement, Categorization of subproject components into A, B or C and (2009) developing required level of environmental assessment for each component. Sub-project is Category B as no significant impacts are envisaged. The Water (Prevention and Control The Act and Rules outlines the activities which are prohibited on of Pollution) Act 1974 and The Water account of their potential to cause water pollution. Pollution from (Prevention and Control of Pollution) various sources in Parichay Tourist Rest House needs to be Rules 1975 controlled as per this Act and Rules The Ancient Monuments and Project site is not an ASI protected monument and there are no any Archaeological Sites and Remains monuments of this nature within the jurisdiction.. Act, 1958, and the rules, 1959 provide Therefore, the provisions of the act does not apply guidance for carrying out activities, including conservation, construction and reuse in and around the protected monuments. Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 This act provides guidelines for conservation of forests and diversion of forest land for non-forest use. The law also states guidelines on de-reservation of various categories of forests for diversion of forest land. This law describes the penalty for contravention of the provisions of the Act. Restriction on the de- reservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purpose. No forest land is to be acquired for the project. Hence this Act is not applicable to the subproject.

1 A C A S ts or activities and change in product mix, will require prior environmental clearance from the Central Government in the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) on the recommendations of an Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) to be constituted by the Central Government for the purpo A C B S ization of existing projects or activities as specified in sub paragraph (ii) of paragraph 2, or change in product mix as specified in sub paragraph (iii) of paragraph 2, but excluding those which fulfil the General Conditions (GC) stipulated in the Schedule, will require prior environmental clearance from the State/Union territory Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). The SEIAA shall base its decision on the recommendations of a State or Union territory level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) as to be constituted for in this notification. In addition, General Condition (GC) of the notification specifies that any project or C B C A, if located in whole or in part within 10 km from the boundary of: (i) Protected Areas notified under the Wild Life Protection) Act, 1972, (ii) Critically Polluted areas as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board from time to time, (iii) Notified Eco-sensitive areas, (iv) inter- State boundaries and international boundaries

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Applicability of Acts/Guidelines Compliance Criteria The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, This Act provides guidelines for protection of [Wild animals, birds 1972, amended 1993, The Wild Life and plants] and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002 incidental thereto. It also states the norms for hunting of wild animals, prohibition of picking, uprooting, etc., of specified plants. The Act deals with the declaration of area as Sanctuary, National Park, and closed area and also states the restriction of entries in the sanctuary. Not Applicable for the subproject Biodiversity Act 2002 and The Act essentially controls access to indigenous biodiversity Biodiversity Rules 2004 resources. No agency/person referred to in sub-section (2) shall, without previous approval of the National Bio-diversity Authority, obtain any biological resource occurring in India or knowledge associated thereto for research or for commercial utilization or for bio-survey and bio-utilization. Not Applicable for the subproject Environmental Impact Assessment It delineates the steps required for obtaining Environmental Notification, 2006 and clearance. As per the notification, a list of projects, requiring Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Clearance from regulatory agencies at the State Act, 2009 or Central government level has been provided. As per this notification, the subproject does not require Environmental Clearance.

7. It can be observed from Table-1, that the proposed sub-project does not need to go through a full-scale environmental assessment process; as the scale of impacts and categorization of the sub-project components will not require clearances from Competent Authorities. The sub-project selection criteria specify that all project activities pertaining to upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House are in accordance with the provisions of the Management Plan.

8. The ADB guidelines, stipulate addressing environmental concerns, if any, of a proposed activity in the initial stages of Project preparation. For this, the ADB Guidelines categorizes the proposed components into categories (A, B or C) to determine the level of environmental assessment required to address the potential impacts. The Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) checklist method was followed as per ADB requirement to assess the potential impacts of the project in planning phase. The REA checklist is attached as Annexure 1 with this report. The subproject has been categorized as B as per the ADB‘s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009). Accordingly this IEE has been prepared to address the potential impacts, in line with the recommended IEE content and structure for Category B project. The IEE has been conducted based on Primary and secondary sources of information and field reconnaissance surveys and stakeholder consultations. Evaluation has been conducted for impacts likely to accrue due to due to location, design & pre-construction, construction, operation & maintenance. An EMP outlining the specific environmental measures to be adhered to during implementation of the subproject has been prepared. D. Report Structure 9. This Report contains eight (8) sections including this introductory section: (i) Introduction; (ii) Description of Project Components; (iii) Description of the Existing Environment; (iv) Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures; (v) Environmental Management Plan; (vi) Public consultation & Information Disclosure; (vii) Findings and Recommendations; and (viii) Conclusions

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand II. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT COMPONENTS A. Project Overview

10. The Department of Tourism, Government of Uttarakhand is the owner of the tourist rest house at the western corner of the lake and Parichay resort an old heritage building constructed in late nineteenth century. Both these TRH are presently managed by Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd or KMVN (a state government agency) and in the current scenario is unable to cope up during the peak season demand of the tourists as the facilities are inadequate and needs renovation /up gradation.

11. The past decade has seen an increase in tourism development in Naukuchiatal, and a number of hotels and resorts have come up especially in the prime location adjoining the lake. As per information provided by the manager at the Parichay Resort, although having 13 rooms with 42 beds average occupancy was 13.4% and 18.6% in year 2011-12 and 2012-13 respectively. Similarly, revenue generated in these years was INR 16.5 lakhs and 23.4 lakhs, and total number of tourist visited was 1297 and 1457 respectively. These figures are quite low as compared to the total visitors which visit the area annually. This may impair the poor infrastructure facility at TRH Parichay.

12. Renovation of TRH Parichay would give new look to this rest house. It will be more attractive to the tourists. Tourist overflow from Nainital and Bhimtal, the two most visited lakes in this region can be tapped to attract budget tourists for day visits to the lake and restaurant and overnight stay at the heritage house of Paarichay. The heritage house can provide banquet facilities for small scale get together and parties. It can cater to army and institutional establishments in the vicinity as well as private parties. Eureka Forbes building provides additional accommodation with toilet facilities.

13. Project location map is shown in Annexure 2. Photo illustration of project location is depicted in Annexure 3

B. Present status 14. The present status of the building has been assessed based on the expert field visits, consultation with stakeholders and staff of Parichay.

 Original symmetrical plan of building altered due to additions and alterations such as the veranda, staff dormitory and toilets.  External finish of the original building in random rubble masonry is lost behind a Grit façade.  Internal wall, floor and surface finishes not conducive to historic character such as use of PVC flooring  Inappropriate additions and alterations including architectural features such as ship windows on the first floor.  Door and window frames damaged.  Poor quality of natural light in the interiors  Roof and ceilings are damaged  Water seepage in the interior which is visible in the form of water marks on false ceiling.  Damaged eaves board, gutter and RWP  Poor space utilization within the building  Level difference in toilets  Generator and electric unit in the kitchen veranda 10

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand  Pump house near the kitchen  Lighting inadequate in the building  Obstructive services such as water tank and electrical systems.  No conduits for electrical networks  Exterior lighting of building and site needs improvement.  No handicap access.  Security system at site inadequate

C. Project components

(i) Repair and Refurbishment of Eureka Forbes Building . Renovation and repair of the building . Removal of obsolete and inappropriate additions and up-gradation of building services . Up-gradation of rooms to incorporate modern day amenities and suitable living arrangement for visitors . Up-gradation of rooms to suites (ii) Construction of a New Restaurant with Central Kitchen . Suitable location identified for construction of new restaurant cum bar to accommodate at least 40-50 people. . Provide an excellent view of the lake and with indoor and outdoor seating. (iii) Construction of New Staff Accommodation and Services Area . Existing kitchen building to be demolished to make way for new staff accommodation and building services. (iv) Master Plan and Management Plan for the Site (As part of DPR) . Strategy document on how the site will area be developed . Overall development concept and framework . Provide guidelines for post implementation repair and maintenance of heritage property . Propose commercial initiatives to attract more visitors for the site . Proposals to enable site managers to use the property for income generation . Capacity building activities for better performance of guest house staff . Identify community based initiatives which will to help maintain site.

15. No objection certificate from Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd or KMVN is attached as Annexure 4.

D. Project Implementation Schedule 16. The implementation period for the proposed subproject is 18 months. Concept Plan preparation started in May 2013. Detailed design started in July 2013. Construction of all elements will begin in the 2nd quarter of the year 2014, and work will be completed in 2015.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

III. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT

A. Environmental profile- Physical Resources 17. Uttarakhand became a separate state carved out of hill districts and sub Himalayan regions of Uttar Pradesh in the year 2000 and is the newly formed hill state in the Indian Himalayan Region. The geographical location (28°43' N to 31°27' N and 77°34' E to 81°02' E) resource setting of Uttarakhand is unique and shares its borders with China and Nepal. It borders the Tibet Autonomous Region on the north, Nepal on the east and the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh to the South, Haryana to the West and Himachal Pradesh to the North West. There are 13 districts in Uttarakhand which are grouped into two divisions: Kumaon division and Garhwal division. The Kumaon division includes six districts: (i) Almora, (ii) Bageshwar, (iii) Champawat, (iv) Nainital, (v) Pithoragarh, and (vi) Udham Singh Nagar. The Garhwal division includes seven districts: (i) Dehradun; (ii) Haridwar; (iii) Tehri Garhwal; (iv) Uttarkashi; (v) Chamoli; (vi) Pauri Garhwal (commonly known as Garhwal); and (vii) Rudraprayag.

18. Uttarakhand has a total geographical area of 51,125 km², of which 64% is covered by forest. A large part of the state is made mountainous. Most of the northern parts of the state are part of Greater Himalaya ranges, covered by the high Himalayan peaks and glaciers, while the lower foothills were densely forested. The difference in altitude between the lowest parts and the highest part (snow peaks of Nandadevi) is almost 7,000 meters.

Topography 19. The subproject area is situated in the lesser Himalayas or Shivalik zone. The subproject area has sub temperate climate with hilly terrain. This region comprises of several fresh water lakes including Naukuchiatal.

Climate 20. The project area receives an annual average rainfall of 242 cm. The average number of rainy days (i.e. days with more than 2.5 mm rainfall) in a year is about 90. About 80% of the rainfall is received under the influence of south-west monsoons i.e from June-September. The maximum and minimum temperature prevailing in the area range from 29-1.8° C. Generally, May and the early part of June are the hottest months of the year. With the onset of monsoons, there is a steady drop in the temperature. January is generally the coolest month of the year. The winds are generally light with an increase in force in summer and the south-west monsoons. The humidity is generally moderate throughout the year, except during monsoon months, when relative humidity is close to 85%. April is the driest month of the year with relatively humidity in afternoons being less than 45%.

Geology and Seismicity 21. The rocks in the area belong to the Nagthat Formation. The rocks of the area are represented by meta-volcanics inter-bedded with quartzite. The meta-volcanics represent the oldest part of the succession and comprise amygdaloidal, vesicular and massive basalt, which are partially converted into epidiorites and amphibolites. These meta-volcanics represent an important magmatic event of the Proterozoic times. The small hillocks in the western side of the lake have thin inter-beds of greenish whitish siltstone and quartzite. The project site is located in Zone –IV as per Seismic Zoning map of India outlined in IS1893:2002. Geomorphology 22. Geomorphologoically the area represents a denudational ridge-valley couple with poiycyclic fluvial imprints. High gradient and low drainage density within the catchments of

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand Bhimtal, Naukuchiatal, Sattal and Khurpata is not conducive to accumulation of clastic derivatives along the drainage lines. However, the presence of lake bodies has produced deltaic conditions at the mouth of the few streams that debouch into the water bodies. As a result of sudden break in stream regime large detritus accumulation as fans are observed in these deltaic environs. The Nauli Gad fan at the mouth of Bhimtal is very conspicuous and is a cause of' concern for the life of the lake. High rate of infiltration transfers the subsurface water into intennontane depressions fonning perennial water bodies. Similarly large subsurface seepage is expected from the lake bottoms through subsurface plumbing system (fractures and dislocation zones) into lower levels across the catchment ridges. High infiltration is observed as lost drainage lines and disappearance of drainage lines even in a non- carbonate terrain. 23. Predominance of sheet runoff over channelised runoff appears to be the main mechanism of surface runoff along the catchment slopes. As a result seasonal scree/debris transfer to lake rims takes place regularly, ultimately entering into the water bodies and is the main source of unnoticed ongoing siltation process in the catchment. A few landslip " zones along Bhimtal, Naukuchiatal, Khurpatal though appear in nacent stage have enough potential to be a major geo-hazard for contributing large sediment flow into the lake bodies. Remnants of high level terraces along the lake bodies indicate the post pliestocene downward movement of the lake depressions, an indication of neotectonic movement in the area. This has bearing on the future land-water resource development in the area as far as seismicity induced damage reduction strategy is concerned

Soils 24. The soil texture in the area varies from coarse loamy, to clayey loamy to silty clay depending on location in the catchment. The majority of forest soil belongs to brown forest soil category. Textural variation is high and within small area, sand content varies from 4.5 to 65%. Silt content ranged from 6.6 to 46.7% and clay content ranged from 3.1 to 56%. Variations are explained by the change of parent material. Sand, stones and shales occur side by side, where as limestone may be found erratically. Alluvium derives forms may vary within short distances depending on the nature of streams.

Water Quality 25. Naukuchiatal lake is a major water body close to the Parichay Tourist Rest House. The water sample of Naukuchiatal lake was collected on 5th May 2013 and analyzed at Govind Ballav Panth University of Agriculture & Technology (GBPUAT), Pantnagar. The results are depicted in Table-2. The Test report is annexed as Annexure 5.

Table 2: Quality of water at Naukuchiatal Lake S.No Parameters Value at Value at Remarks Surface 27m Depth a) Air temp (0C) 30.5 - Satisfactory b) Water temp(0C) 25 12.4 Colder Towards bottom c) Conductivity(µS/cm) 253 384 Higher value at the bottom d) Transparency (cm) 85 Less transparent e) TDS(mg/l) 142.5 280.9 Higher towards bottom f) DO(mg/l) 9.12 0.17 Deficient at bottom g) BOD(mg/l) 1.2 12.3 Large Variation

h) Free CO2(mg/l) 0 0 Unsatisfactory at bottom i) Total Alkalinity(mg/l) 110 160 Lower at surface j) pH 7.8 8 Alkaline k) Nitrate(mg/l) 0.36 0.25 At Higher level 13

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

l) Chloride (mg/l) 8.3 9.2 m) Magnesium( mg/l) 9.0 9.6 Higher towards Bottom n) Calcium (mg/l) 16.75 25.80 o) Potassium (mg/l) 4.0 5.1 p) Iron (mg/l) 0.08 0.1 q) Lead (mg/l) 0.03 0.04 Higher towards Bottom r) Cadmium (mg/l) 0.02 0.025 Source: Water sampling done on 5th May 2013

26. pH value ranged from 7.7 at surface to 8.0 at bottom. The total dissolved solids were recorded as 142.5 mg/1 in surface water and 280.9 mg/l at a depth of 27 m indicating that chemical stratification exists during this period along with thermal stratification. The Electrical Conductivity was recorded as 253 µs/cm at surface and 384 µs/cm at a depth of 27m. The BOD level was 1.2 and 12.3 mg/l at surface and 27 m depth respectively. The BOD level indicates is attributable to the DO levels in the water at various depths.

27. The Total coliform count was 175 and faecal coliform a 15 (MPN) recorded in July 2002 tends to confirm the low status of pollution. The water analysis carried out by Uttaranchal Jal Sansthan of Lake Naukuchiatal on 26th December 2012 revealed that Faecal Coliform has increased 94 (MPN), indicating an increase in pollution load.

B. Ecological Resources and Biodiversity

Forest Type 28. This region is covered by mostly forest of pines, oak. shrubs and grasses mostly cover the degraded slopes. The southern aspect of lower slopes is covered by lantana and xerophytic vegetation. The vegetation of the study area has been heavily altered with human activity. The study area is partially dominated by forest and by agricultural ecosystem. The major front type reported in the study area are:

 Chir Pine forests are the most important forest type of this zone growing on a large scale from out 150m to about 2000 m and ascending higher wherever adverse conditions prevent ~ survival of temperate forests. Banj (Quercus leucotrichophora), Burans (Rhododendron arboreum), Kaphal (Myrica sapida), Mehal (Pyrus pashia), Utis (Alnus nepalensis) towards the upper limit and Sandan (Ougenia oogenensis), Jamun (Sygigium cuminii). Tunga (Rhus parvijlora) are also reputed. Large belts of pure chir crops are a common sight throughout the hills.

 Oak Forests: Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora) forests occupy the altitudinal zone of 1800 – 2100 m and descending to 1500m on northern slopes or even to 1100m in deep valleys and ravines. Banj occurs in association with Burans, Anyar, Mehal, Kaphal, Garpipal (Populus ciliata), Rianj (Qztercus lanuginosa) and Phaniyat (Queries glauca), etc. The undergrowth is dense with Viburnum spp., Rubus spp., Berberis asiatica, Desmodium, Rosa moschata, ringal etc. The oak forests have nearly lost their capacity of regeneration due to overgrazing and heavy lopping.

Flora & Fauna 29. The forest area surrounding the Parichay Tourist Rest House mainly comprises of Van Panchayat land of village Thapalia Mehragaon, Silouti and Chanouti villages. Besides there are small pockets of privately managed forests in the close vicinity of the lake. The main forest vegetation of these forests consist of Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora) and Chir pine 14

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand (Pinus roxburghii). The local community is dependent on these forests for fuel, fodder and leaf litter. Along the Naukuchiatal lake, there is close plantation of Willow (Salix sp.) and Jackaranda as avenue plantation. Orchids and lichens are common in these trees. A large variety of medicinal and aromatic herbs are also found in these forests. No tree felling is required for the renovation work.

30. Among the major wild life, leopard (Panthera pardus), wild bear (Sus scrofa cristatus), Sambhar deer (Cervus unicolor), Swamp deer (Cervus duvaucelli), wild boar, monkey (Macaca mubuatavillosa), langur (Presbytis schistaceous), jackal (Canis aureus), porcupine (Hystrix indica) are common. The common bird species are Harial (Treron phoenicoptera), Dhanesh (Tockus birostris), jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and the Great Indian Hornbill (Dichoceros bicornis). Among the reptiles, python, rat snake, monitor lizard, King Cobra, Cobra, Common Krait, Russell’s Viper and pit Viper infests the forests of Naukuchiatal catchment. No existence of wild animal nearby the TRH Parichay.

Fish Biodiversity 31. The water body nearest to Parichay Rest House is Naukuchiatal Lake. The Naukuchiatal lake was once having abundant population of mighty sport and food fish, Mahseer. Presently the population of Mahseer in Naukuchiatal is very poor. The fish fauna is represented by Gambusia affinis and Puntius spp. in littoral regions, Silver carp and Grass carp in limnetic and common carp in benthic. The important fish biodiversity of Naukuchiatal Lake are listed in Table 3.

Table 3:- Fish Biodiversity in Naukuchiatal Lake Order Family Fish Species Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Calla calla Cirrhinus mrigala Ctenopharyngodon idellus Cyprinus carpio Labeo bata Labeo calbasu Labeo rohita Puntius conchonius Puntius sophore Puntius ticto Tor putitora Tor tor Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Barilius bola Barilius bendelisis Barilius vagra Raiamas bola – Schizothorax richardsonii Noemachelius beavani Noemachelius montanus Poccilidae Gambusia affinis Perciformes Channoidei Channa striatus Channa gachua Channa marulius Channa puntatus Mastacembeloidae Mastacembelus armatus Source: Directorate of Cold Water Fisheries, Bhimtal 15

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand 32. The presence of abundant population of unwanted fishes is highly destructive to lake ecosystem. Also the water quality parameters are not in optimum concentration and create problems to the survival of fishes. The lake gets thermally stratified during summer months while during the winter months there is circulation resulting in occasional fish kills.

Ambient Air Quality 33. Ambient air quality measurements in Naukuchiatal Lake area are shown in Table 4. (Details in Annexure 5) The monitoring was done on 8/7/13 and 9/7/13. The PM10 and PM2.5 level 3 3 ranged from 54 to 64 µg/m and 25 to 27 µg/m , which is well below the permissible limit of 3 3 100 and µg/m and 60 µg/m respectively. Likewise, Sulphur dioxide and Nitrogen dioxide too were well below the permissible limit. This is expected in an area with no major sources of air pollution. Table 4: Ambient Air Quality (24 hours basis) Parameters measured Unit Near Pump TRH Lake View Allowable Limit* House Parichay Resort Respirable Particulate µg/m3 64 56 54 100 Matter (PM10) Respirable Particulate µg/m3 31 27 25 60 Matter (PM2.5) 3 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) µg/m 10 08 06 80 3 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) µg/m 14 18 16 80 *Allowable Limit = National Ambient Air Quality Standards as per CPCB Notification New Delhi, 18 Nov,2009, Date of sampling= 08.07.2013 to 09.07.2013

Ambient Noise Levels 34. Ambient noise quality has been monitored during preparation of this report. The data of noise monitoring are shown in Table 5 (Details in Annexure 5). The day time equivalent noise level ranged from 39.4 to 40.8 dB(A), which is well below the permissible limit.

Table 5: Ambient Noise Quality at Naukuchiatal area S.No. Location Unit Measured values Allowable limits (*Leq Values) /Specification (CPCB)/Leq (dB (A) 1. Near Pump House dB(A) 40.8 2. TRH Parichay dB(A) 39.4 55 3. Lake View Resort dB(A) 40.4 *Leq Values = Equivalent Continuous Sound Pressure Level Date of sampling= 09.07.2013

C. Economic Resources

35. The people of the villages nearby the project site are directly dependent on tourism based activities for their livelihoods. More than 150 households of the villages are engaged in the tourism activities like boating, horse riding, taxi driving, restaurant & guest house workers, photography, general store worker, sale of local produce etc. The months of May and June are the peak tourist season when majority of the tourist (8 to 10 lakh or 80% of the total) visits the lake. Around 15 lakh tourists visit the area mainly during the summer and autumn.

Livestock 36. Livestock is mainly reared for milk production and compost agriculture in the project area is closely integrated with forests and animal husbandry. The agriculture is predominantly subsistence based and majority of population is dependent on market fall grains, pulses,

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand vegetables and milk. Tourism and allied activities are the main occupation of local community. Due to closeness from the block and district head quarters and being a tourist destination the project has almost all infrastructure facilities like road, electricity, education, drinking water, health banks, post office, market, police station etc. within a periphery of 5 km. Livelihood and Employment 37. The average income of each household engaged in tourism activity is INR 10,000 per month. As per livelihood portfolio survey done by the team, around 60 households are involved in boating with more than 150 boats, 15 households mainly scheduled caste are involved in horse riding, 40 families associated in hotel/guesthouse enterprise, 15 household manage restaurants and teashops, 4 person practice photography and 8 households having general store. There is huge potential of tourism development in the area which will provide more employment to the local youth and improve the livelihoods security of local community.

38. The rural economy is largely agriculture and tourism based with almost 100% practice agricultural and allied activities like horticulture, and livestock, Non-Agricultural economic activities includes tourism related activities like boat keeping, horse keeping, restaurant, selling of wild edibles, fruits etc, skilled and unskilled labour in construction works, Government service, private jobs, shop-keeping, tailoring, transport service etc.

39. The number of females per thousands males is 888. The women face the challenge of doing maximum households chores and most of the agricultural tasks. The time use analysis shows that on average women spend 17, 15 and 14 hours per day in various households and agricultural works during summers, winters and rainy season respectively.

Industries 40. There are no industries located in the vicinity of Lake Naukuchiatal, except for hotels/resorts to cater the tourist requirement. In addition to Parichay Tourist Rest House, there are 25 hotels/guest houses located in the vicinity of the project area. The list of hotels/guest house is given in Table 6.

Table 6: List of Hotels/Guest houses in the vicinity of the project area S. No. Name of Hotel/Guest Location Accommodation availability House/Lodge No of rooms No of beds 1. Green valley Naul 11 28 2. Paridise resort Naul 15 30 3. Lagooon Naul 4 16 4. Amity Guest house Naul 5 10 5. Spring bird Naul 5 10 6. Grace villa Naul 10 20 7. Alinda house Thaplia Mehragaon 7 14 8. Karnatak guest house Thaplia Mehragaon 3 6 9. Lake resort Thaplia Mehragaon 32 64 10. Club mahindra Thaplia Mehragaon 32 64 11. Jungle adventure camp Thaplia Mehragaon 7 14 12. TRH Thaplia Mehragaon 14 36 13. Breeze n cloud Thaplia Mehragaon 24 48 14. Blue rose Siloti 3 6 15. Firdan cottage Siloti 3 6 16. Lake pleasant Siloti 3 6 17. Green avenue Siloti 3 6 18. Habitat Siloti 3 6 19. Garden nest Siloti 6 12 20. Hill skirt Siloti 13 26 21. Manoram view Siloti 6 12 22. At last Chanoti 4 8 17

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

23. R.n.R Chanoti 7 14 24. Lake view Chanoti 6 12 25. Lake village Chanoti 30 60

D. Social and Cultural Resources

Demography 41. The subproject area lies in Bhimtal block of Nainital District. There are five revenue villages situated in the immediate catchment of Naukuchiatal Lake. These are Thaplia Mehragaon, Bohragaon, Chanauti, Siloti and Naul. The population of these villages is 1780 with 377 households, mainly belonging to the Brahmins, Rajput and Schedule castes. The demographic data of Nainital District and project area villages are summarized in the Tables 7 and 8 respectively. Table 7: Demographic profile of Nainital District S.No Nainital Total House Population District holds Total Male Female SC ST 1 Rural 114954 582871 299257 283614 137906 5780 2 Urban 76429 371734 194409 177325 53300 1715 3 Total 191383 954605 493666 460939 191206 7495 Source: Census data, 2011 of Nainital District, Department of Statistics Table 8: Demographic profile of project area villages S.No Villages Total House Population holds Total Male Female SC ST 1 Thapalia Mehragaon 141 735 389 346 47 0 2 Bohragaon 66 295 148 147 69 0 3 Siloti Pant 75 284 157 127 90 0 4 Chanoti 43 236 125 111 0 0 5 Naul 52 230 124 106 28 0 Total 377 1780 943 837 234 0 Source: Census data, 2011 of Nainital District, Department of Statistics

Basic Amenities and Infrastructure 42. Due to closeness from the block and district headquarters, the project has almost all basic infrastructure facilities but their management is poor. All the villages are accessible by motorable roads, electricity and telephone/mobile-phone. The primary and secondary education facility are available in the project area, but the nearest primary health facilities are available at Bhimtal (5 km). Bank and postal services are also available in the project area. Bhimtal, Bhowali, Haldwani and Nainital are the main markets of the project area. The details of basic amenities and infrastructure available in the project area are given in the Table 9.

Table 9: Basic Amenities in the Project Area S. No. Basic amenities and Infrastructure Location & Distance (km) 1 Primary Health Centre Bhimtal (5 kms) 2 Intermediate School Bhimtal (5 kms) 3 Post Graduate College Nainital (27 kms) 4 Post Office Bhimtal (5 kms) 5 Bank Naukuchiatal (1 kms), Bhimtal (5 kms) 6 Veterinary Hospital Bhimtal (5 kms) 7 Petrol Pump Khutani (8 kms) 8 Main Market Bhimtal, Bhowali (16 kms), Haldwani (30 kms) and Nainital 9 Mandi/market for selling of produce Bhowali (16 kms) and Haldwani (30 kms) 10 Police Station Bhimtal (5 kms)

Government Tourism Infrastructure

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand 43. In addition to Parichay Rest house, tourist rest house at the western corner of Lake Naukuchiatal is owned by the government. There are two Governments owned Rest House in region. Both these Tourist Rest Houses (TRH) are presently managed by Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam or KMVN (a state government agency) and unable to cope up during the peak season demand of the tourists the facilities are inadequate and needs renovation /up gradation. As per information received by the manager at the Parichay resort, although having 13 rooms with 42 beds average occupancy was 13.4% and 18.6% in year 2011-12 and 2012- 13 respectively. Similarly, revenue generated in these years was INR 16.5 lakhs and 23.4 lakhs, and total numbers of tourist visited were 1297 and 1457 respectively. These figures are very low in comparison to the total visitors which visit the area annually.

SWOT Analysis 44. The SWOT analysis of Naukuchiatal region as a tourist destination was done with the objective of assessing its tourism potential and possibilities for sustainable tourism development in the next decade. The study of SWOT analysis shows that the important and accepted livelihood option is tourism based. The strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats of which are summarized below.

Strengths: Opportunities:  Presence of Naukuchiatal in the vicinity of the  The Government of India has given special Parichay Tourist Rest House lake which attracts attention to eastern Uttarakhand tourism circuit. large number of tourists every year  ADB has supported the state for tourism  Climate and geographical conditions are soothing development in this region of Uttarakhand. and abundance of natural endowments  There is a potentiality for private sector  Tourism is the primary occupation of majority of investment in tourism projects households  Besides Intra regional tours there are  Rich Cultural heritage and bio-diversity of the opportunities for promoting cross border towns region to neighbouring countries like Nepal  Availability of KMVN as a government enterprise, which is promoting tourism in Kumaon region

Weaknesses: Threats:  Underutilized infrastructure facilities of the Rest  Competition from other tourism destinations like House Nainital  Lack of effective marketing of tourism based  Competition of other hotels/guest houses in the products region.  Poor industrial capacity and lack of proper  Threats from uncontrolled urbanization and training. tourism development  Underutilized network and synergy among public  Safety concerns in wake of recent floods and private organization of the region  Environmental concerns like pollution of lake, noise pollution, landslides etc.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 45. The assessment for environmental impacts due to the implementation of this project has been carried out for potential impacts during the following stages of the project planning and implementation:

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand  Location impacts: Impacts associated with site selection, including impacts on environment and resettlement or livelihood related impacts on communities and wildlife  Design impacts: Impacts arising from project design, including the technology used, scale of operations, discharge standards etc  Construction impacts: Impacts resulting from construction activities including site clearance, earthworks, civil works, etc.  O&M impacts: Impacts associated with the operation and maintenance of the infrastructure built in the project.

Location Impact:

A. Land Acquisition and Resettlement

46. The location considered for the subproject is within the area designated for ecotourism as part of developing Uttarakhand‘s conservation, heritage, natural and cultural attractions, and are outside areas demarcated for habitat protection and conservation. The proposed subproject envisages upgradation of infrastructure within the existing complex of Parichay Tourist Rest House. No additional land is to be acquired. Thus, resettlement and rehabilitation is not required for the subproject.

B. Environmental Impacts

Design Impacts and Pre-Construction Impacts

47. Impacts arising from the inappropriate designs of proposed facilities would in general include the contemporary designs for the traditional and cultural environment, etc. Selection of materials, if not carefully chosen, will adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the surroundings. The results of interventions are unobtrusive and will be integral part of the overall ambience so as to avoid impacts on the aesthetics of the site. Structural designs to be worked out in such a manner that over ground structures do not affect the aesthetics of the area. All component designs will be worked out to minimize any impacts on the adjoining properties, and considering the drainage and sewerage connections on the road. Given that the there is a need for disposal of construction wastes, the contractors will be required to consult with the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) and Uttarakhand Environment Protection and Pollution Board (UEPPB) for safe disposal sites.

48. No additional land is required for the sub-project. The entire restoration and upgradation works will be carried out within existing Parichay Tourist Rest House. Thus, telephone lines, electric poles and wires, water and sewer lines will not be affected. The storm water runoff from alterations of the site‘s natural drainage patterns due to landscaping, excavation works in the Parichay Rest House area and landscaping near lake edge will be taken care in the designs. Selection of materials and construction technologies shall be carefully chosen, so that it does not adversely impact the aesthetic appeal of the destinations. Designs will ensure energy conservation. Construction Impacts 49. All construction activities to be undertaken at the site will be approved by PIU and before start of any such activity in the vicinity of the site so that the history and sanctity as well as the usability of the site by the projected number of tourists are not hampered. The construction stage impacts due to the proposed project components are generic to the 20

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand construction activities. The EMP emphasizes on the construction impacts and necessary mitigation measures to be strictly followed by the contractor and supervised by the DSC and PIU. The key impacts are covered in the following paragraphs.

50. Impacts due to stock piles of waste and top soil: Improper stockpiling of construction materials and top soil can obstruct drainage, disturb tourists, etc. Due consideration will be given for material storage and construction sites such that it doesn‘t cause any hindrance to tourists movement within the site. Stockpiles will be covered to protect from dust and erosion.

51. Disposal of construction waste: The unscientific disposal of construction waste could lead to siltation of the lake. In the proposed subproject, it should be made mandatory for the contractor involved in construction activities for purpose disposal of the construction waste at the disposal site as designated by the PIU and DSC. It will also be ensured that no construction waste will be disposed in the lake and the site will be stabilized with proper leveling and landscaping.

52. Impacts due to disposal of demolition waste: The removal of obsolete and inappropriate additions to the building, demolition of existing kitchen would lead to generation of waste. The waste shall be reused to the extent possible, and the remaining waste shall be disposed at a designated site, selecting in consultation with district administration.

53. Quarry/Borrow pits operations: The construction material required for restoration and upgradation works shall be procured for market areas. If some stone/rock material is required, then the same shall be taken from existing quarries. No new quarry is proposed to be opened for the project, which will be procured from market. No quarrying/borrow pit operation are required. Hence there are no impacts in this subject.

54. Impacts on drainage pattern: The land to be utilized for the project is quite less. Proper care has been taken for location of construction sites. Hence, no impact is expected on drainage pattern in the area.

55. Impacts due to sewage disposal: About 30 labor and technical staff are likely to be involved in the project construction activities. The labor will be locally available. Hence no labor colony will be established. Community toilets will be constructed near construction sites. The sewage generated by labour population during their working hours at construction site will be treated in a septic tank, prior to disposal.

56. Increase in noise levels: Noise levels in the immediate proximity of most work sites are expected to increase during construction. The duration of this exposure will be relatively brief. This exposure represents temporary, localized, adverse residual effect of low to moderate significance for affected receptors. While building damage due to ground vibrations is unlikely, there may be annoyance to spatially located receptors during construction. Noise levels associated with the subproject operations will be largely imperceptible as civil works will be confined in relatively small sites.

57. Impacts on biodiversity during construction phase: Since no labor camp is being established and no additional land is being acquired, no impacts are expected on the biodiversity during the construction phase.

58. Disturbance to traffic during construction phase: At the time of construction there will be

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand disturbance and inconvenience for the movement of the public and vehicles due to project construction activities, particularly during transportation of construction materials. These impacts will be temporary in nature and last for a very short period.

59. Impacts on cultural properties: The proposed project shall not affect any sites of religious, historical and/or cultural significance.

60. Impacts on utilities: The entire construction work will be done within the existing complex of Parichay Tourist. Hence no adverse impact is envisaged.

Operation and Maintenance Impacts

61. The proposed sub-project envisages restoration and refurbishment of heritage guest house, repair and refurbishment of Eureka Forbes Building, Construction of a new restaurant with central kitchen, construction of new staff accommodation and services area, landscaping of TRH Parichay site and lake edge. This above measures will restore and renovate the 19th century heritage house in order to enhance its heritage attributes, an attraction for informed clients and heritage lovers, tap into the potential of its natural setting by creating opportunities for recreational activities such as walking trail and sit outs to attract nature lovers to the site, develop visitor services such as restaurant, outdoor, cafe, as assets for the site which will generate additional revenue and attract locals and well as visitors passing through the area, improve the occupancy of the heritage house, staff building (Eureka Forbes), outdoor tents by upgrading and refurbishing the interiors in order to provide better standard of living for visitors.

62. The most significant beneficial impact on the environment is through improvement of infrastructure in Parichay Tourist Rest House. The project initiatives will encourage tourist populations to these destinations. The project will also build the capacity of primary and secondary stakeholders by training on environmental and livelihood aspect.

Environmental Mitigation Measures

63. The specific measures stated in the EMP will address all adverse environmental impacts due to the subproject. A detailed monitoring plan prepared as part of this IEE will ensure negative environmental impacts during implementation are mitigated. During the detailed design stage, the IEE/EMP will be further updated and stand-alone EMPs for each of the procurement packages will be prepared. These EMPs will be appended to the respective contract documents to enable integration of environmental provisions in the contract. Based on the environmental baseline conditions, planned project activities and impacts assessed earlier, the set of measures to be adopted to ameliorate the adverse impacts are listed in following paragraphs.

64. Measures to Mitigate Location Impacts . In accordance with the provisions in the subproject selection criteria, the subproject design will include adequate provisions for ensuring effective maintenance and protection of the assets created so as to ensure the long term sustainability of the sites. . Designs will be worked out and implemented in accordance with the provisions. Further, the design guidelines for the project components will strictly conform to Uttarakhand architecture.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand 65. Measures to Mitigate Design Impacts . Design of proposed components will enable efficient drainage at the Parichay Tourist Rest House and maintain natural drainage patterns. . Designs will be worked out in such a manner that exposed steel and concrete structures are avoided. The obsolete and inappropriate additions will be removed. The design brief for all components proposed will strictly conform to the Uttarakhand architecture. The usage of construction machinery within the existing premises will be disallowed, except for handheld equipments, if necessary. Any new landscaping elements will only utilize native species to protect local biodiversity

66. Measures to Mitigate Impacts due to Pre-construction Activities . Prior to commencement of site activities and mobilization on ground, the Contractor will prepare and get approved by the PIU and DSC, circulation plan during construction for safe passage of tourists during construction stage, including development of alternative access routes, traffic regulations, signage, etc. during construction. . The commencement of site clearance activities will be undertaken with due permission from the Environment Specialist of the DSC consultant to minimize environmental impacts. . All areas used for temporary construction operations will be subject to complete restoration to their former condition with appropriate rehabilitation procedures. . Location of disposal sites will be finalized by the Environmental Specialist of the DSC so that disposal of the material does not impact natural drainage courses or surface water bodies or low lying areas and that no endangered / rare flora is impacted by such materials

67. Measures to Mitigate Construction Impacts . Due consideration will be given for material storage and construction sites such that it doesn‘t cause any hindrance to tourist movement within the site. . Stockpiles will be covered to protect from dust and erosion. . The topsoil from borrow areas, areas of cutting and areas will be stripped to a specified depth of 150mm, translocated and stored in stockpiles. . The stockpile will be designed such that the slope does not exceed 1:2 (vertical to horizontal). . Stockpiles will not be surcharged or otherwise loaded and multiple handling will be kept to a minimum to ensure that no compaction will occur. The stockpiles will be covered with gunny bags or tarpaulin. . Slope protection measures will be undertaken along slopes of the parking area. The work will consist of measures as per design, or as directed by the Engineer to control soil erosion, sedimentation and water pollution. . Silt fencing to be provided at all water bodies near construction sites to prevent sediments from the construction site to enter into the watercourses. The number of units of silt fencing to be installed is to be decided by the engineer. . The contractor will take every precaution to reduce the levels of dust at construction sites to the satisfaction of the Engineer. All earthworks to be protected/covered in a manner acceptable to the satisfaction of the engineer to minimize dust generation. Clearance will be affected immediately by manual sweeping and removal of debris, or if so directed by the Engineer. . The discharge standards promulgated under the Environmental Protection Act, will be strictly adhered to. All vehicles, equipment and machinery used for construction will conform to the relevant Standard.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand . All vehicles, equipment and machinery used for construction will be regularly maintained to ensure that pollution emission levels comply with the relevant requirements. . Noise level for construction equipment used in this project (measured at one meter from the edge of the equipment in free field) such as compactors, rollers, front loaders, concrete mixers, cranes (moveable), vibrators and saws will not exceed 75 dB (A). Notwithstanding any other conditions of contract, noise level from any item of plant(s) will comply with the relevant legislation for levels of noise emission. . All workers employed on cement, lime mortars, concrete etc., will be provided with protective footwear and protective goggles. . Cut material generated because of cutting of hill slopes will be utilized for construction of retaining walls, embankments and as filling material. Remaining material if any will be disposed off safely at the disposal sites. . All reasonable precaution will be taken to prevent danger of the workers and the public from fire, flood, drowning, etc. . All necessary steps will be taken for prompt first aid treatment of all injuries likely to be sustained during the course of work. . Contractor to prepare site restoration plans for approval by the Engineer. The plan is to be implemented by the contractor prior to demobilization. . On completion of the works, all temporary structures will be cleared away, all rubbish burnt, excreta or other disposal pits or trenches filled in and effectively sealed off and the site left clean and tidy, at the Contractor‘s expense, to the entire satisfaction of the Engineer.

68. Measures to Mitigate O&M Impacts . In line with the Government targets of coverage of all urban and rural areas with environmentally safe solid waste management systems, tourist destinations will be covered with integrated waste management facilities, including treatment and disposal, in line with the Solid Waste Handling Rules, 2000.

69. Responsibilities of Contractors . Abide by the environmental laws formulated by the community institution (Naukuchiatal lake conservation and management society). . Signages and wall writings along the road side for generating lake conservation awareness. . Regularly remove trash from the site on daily basis. . Report camp fires or other inappropriate human use of the Naukuchiatal lake, and inappropriate behavior from construction workers affecting lake ecology and biodiversity. . Area should be declared as plastic free, smoking free and silence zone and sign boards for the purpose should be displayed at work site and workers should be made aware about it by training . Swimming, bathing and washing clothes by the workers in the nearby Naukuchiatal lake will be strictly prohibited . Cutting and collection of fuel wood by the construction workers from the nearby forest should be strictly prohibited . It will be ensured by the contractor that the topsoil will not be unnecessarily trafficked either before stripping or when in stockpiles. Such stockpiled topsoil will be returned to cover the disturbed area and cut slopes. . Contractor with support of the PIU will carry out dissemination of these information and circulation plan at key entry points to the respective destinations

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand . Contractor will be responsible for arrangement of water in every workplace at suitable and easily accessible place for the whole construction period. . Sufficient supply of potable water to be provided and maintained. If the drinking water is obtained from an intermittent public water supply then, storage tanks will be provided. . Contractor will ensure that construction activities o not result any contamination of land, water or air by polluting substances . Contractor will ensure that no trees or shrubs or water side vegetation are felled or harmed except those required to be cleared for execution of work. The Contractor will protect tree and vegetation from damage to satisfaction of the engineer.

70. Responsibilities of PIU & DSC . Sponsor seminars and/or distribute educational materials to contractors and visitors about environmentally beneficial conservation procedures . Organize workers’ training program for the contractors for environmental management during construction works . Educate the contractors regarding the eco-sensitivity of the area and explain how to protect bio-diversity during construction works . Regular site visit and reporting during construction works to check whether objectives of EMP being followed.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand 71. The summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures to be followed in this project are given in Table 10.

Table-10: Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Field Duration/ Magnitude Mitigation Measures Responsibility Extent 1. Location Impacts 1.1 Lack of sufficient planning to Permanent Major In accordance with the provisions in the subproject selection PIU/DSC assure long term sustainability of criteria, the subproject design will include adequate provisions for the improvements and ensure ensuring effective maintenance and protection of the assets protection of the assets created created so as to ensure the long term sustainability of the sites. and the architectural character of The designs are be worked out and implemented in accordance the surroundings. with the provisions. Further, the design guidelines for the project components will strictly conform to Uttarakhand architecture. 2. Design Impacts 2.1 Increased storm water runoff from Permanent Minor Design of proposed components will enable efficient drainage of PIU/DSC alterations of the site‘s natural the sites and maintain natural drainage patterns. drainage patterns due to additional structures in TRH complex and landscaping works in the area and on lake edge. 2.2 Selection of materials and Permanent Moderate Designs to be worked out in such a manner that exposed steel PIU/DSC construction technologies, if not and concrete structures are avoided. The design brief for all carefully chosen, will adversely components proposed will strictly conform to the Uttarakhand impact the aesthetic appeal of the architecture. The usage of construction machinery within the destinations existing premises will be disallowed, except for handheld equipments, if necessary. Any new landscaping elements will only utilize native species to protect local biodiversity 2.3 Integration of energy efficiency Permanent Minor The detailed designs for the subproject components will ensure PIU/DSC and energy conservation energy efficiency programs in design of subproject components 3. Pre-construction Activities 3.1 Circulation plan during Temporary Moderate Prior to commencement of site activities and mobilization on Contractor/

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Field Duration/ Magnitude Mitigation Measures Responsibility Extent construction in the tourist ground, the Contractor will prepare and get approved by the DSC/PIU destinations Engineer, circulation plan during construction for safe passage of tourists during construction stage, including development of alternative access routes, traffic regulations, signages, etc., during construction. The Contractor with support of the PIU will carry out dissemination of these information and circulation plan at key entry points to the respective destinations. 3.2 Site clearance activities, including Temporary Moderate The commencement of site clearance activities will be undertaken Contractor/ delineation of construction areas with due permission from the Environment Specialist of the DSC DSC consultant to minimize environmental impacts. All areas used for temporary construction operations will be subject to complete restoration to their former condition with appropriate rehabilitation procedures. 3.3 Drinking water availability and Temporary Major The contractor will be responsible for arrangement of water in every Contractor/ water arrangement workplace at suitable and easily accessible place for the whole DSC construction period. Sufficient supply of potable water to be provided and maintained. If drinking water is obtained from an intermittent public water supply then, storage tanks will be provided. 3.4 Identification of sites for disposal of Permanent Major Location of disposal sites will be finalized by the Environmental Contractor/ construction and demolition work Specialist of the DSC so that disposal of the material does not DSC impact natural drainage courses or surface water bodies or low lying areas and that no endangered / rare flora is affected by disposal of construction and demolition waste 4. Construction Impacts 4.1 Improper stockpiling of Temporary Minor Due consideration will be given for material storage and Contractor/ construction materials cause construction sites such that it doesn‘t cause any hindrance to DSC impacts starting from obstruction movement within the site. Stockpiles will be covered to protect from of drainage, disturbance/ safety dust and erosion. hazard to tourists, etc. 4.2 Stripping, stocking and Permanent Minor The topsoil from borrow areas, areas of cutting and areas will be Contractor/ preservation of top soil stripped to a specified depth of 150mm, translocated and stored in DSC 27

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Field Duration/ Magnitude Mitigation Measures Responsibility Extent stockpiles. The stockpile will be designed such that the slope does not exceed 1:2 (vertical to horizontal). Stockpiles will not be surcharged or otherwise loaded and multiple handling will be kept to a minimum to ensure that no compaction will occur. The stockpiles will be covered with gunny bags or tarpaulin. It will be ensured by the contractor that the topsoil will not be unnecessarily trafficked either before stripping or when in stockpiles. Such stockpiled topsoil will be returned to cover the disturbed area and cut slopes. 4.3 Soil Erosion Temporary Minor Slope protection measures will be undertaken along slopes of the Contractor/ parking area and other sites vulnerable to soil erosion. The work DSC will consist of measures as per design, or as directed by the Engineer to control soil erosion, sedimentation and water pollution. 4.4 Soil and Water Pollution due to fuel Temporary Minor The fuel storage will be stationed such that fuel discharge does not Contractor/ and lubricants, construction waste drain into the water body. Soil and water pollution parameters will DSC be monitored as per monitoring plan. 4.5 Siltation of water bodies due to Temporary Major Silt fencing to be provided on construction sites close to Contractor/ spillage of construction and Naukuchiatal lake to prevent sediments from the construction site DSC demolition wastes to enter into the lake. The number of units of silt fencing to be installed is to be decided by the engineer. Haul roads on the site and approaches to the watercourse (or drains leading to watercourses) will be regularly cleaned to prevent the buildup of mud; areas of bare soil will be kept to a practical minimum to reduce silt runoff. No disposal of construction wastes will be carried out into the river. Extraneous construction wastes will be transported to the pre-identified disposal site for safe disposal. 4.6 Generation of Dust Temporary Minor The contractor will take every precaution to reduce the levels of Contractor/ dust at construction sites to the satisfaction of the Engineer. All DSC earthworks to be protected/covered in a manner acceptable to the satisfaction of the engineer to minimize dust generation. Clearance will be affected immediately by manual sweeping and removal of 28

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Field Duration/ Magnitude Mitigation Measures Responsibility Extent debris, or if so directed by the Engineer, the road surfaces will be hosed or watered using necessary equipment. 4.7 Emission from construction Temporary Minor The discharge standards promulgated under the Environmental Contractor/ vehicles, equipment and Protection Act will be strictly adhered to. All vehicles, equipment DSC machinery and machinery used for construction will conform to the relevant Standard. All vehicles, equipments and machinery used for construction will be regularly maintained to ensure that pollution emission levels comply with the relevant requirements. 4.8 Noise from construction Temporary Minor Maintenance of vehicles, equipment and machinery will be regular Contractor/ equipment and to the satisfaction of the Engineer, to keep noise from these at DSC a minimum. All vehicles and equipment used for construction will be fitted with exhaust silencers. During routine servicing operations, the effectiveness of exhaust silencers will be checked and if found to be defective will be replaced. Noise limits for construction equipment used in this project (measured at one meter from the edge of the equipment in free field) such as compactors, rollers, front loaders, concrete mixers, cranes (moveable), vibrators and saws will not exceed 75 dB (A). Notwithstanding any other conditions of contract, noise level from any item of plant(s) will comply with the relevant legislation for levels of noise emission. 4.9 Material Handling at Site Temporary Minor All workers employed on mixing asphaltic material, cement, lime Contractor/ mortars, concrete etc., will be provided with protective footwear and DSC protective goggles. Workers, who are engaged in welding works, will be provided with welder‘s protective eye-shields. Workers engaged in stone breaking activities will be provided with protective goggles and clothing and will be seated at sufficiently safe intervals. 4.10 Disposal of Construction Waste/ Temporary Minor Safe disposal of the bituminous wastes, extraneous material will be Contractor/ Debris / Cut Material ensured in the pre-identified disposal locations. In no case, any DSC 29

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Field Duration/ Magnitude Mitigation Measures Responsibility Extent construction waste will be disposed around the project road indiscriminately. Cut material generated because of cutting of hill slopes will be utilized for construction of retaining walls, embankments and as filling material. Remaining material if any will be disposed off safely at the disposal sites. 4.11 Safety Measures During Temporary Moderate Personal Protective Equipment for workers on the project and Contractor/ Construction adequate safety measures for workers during handling of materials DSC at site will be taken up. The contractor has to comply with all regulations regarding safe scaffolding, ladders, working platforms, gangway, stairwells, excavations, trenches and safe means of entry and egress. 4.12 Risk caused by Force Majeure Temporary Minor All reasonable precautions will be taken to prevent danger of the Contractor/ workers and the public from fire, flood, drowning, etc. All necessary DSC steps will be taken for prompt first aid treatment of all injuries likely to be sustained during the course of work. 4.13 Malaria Risk Temporary Minor The Contractor will, at his own expense, conform to all anti-malaria Contractor/ instructions given to him by the Engineer. DSC 5. O&M Impacts 5.1 Environmental Conditions Temporary Moderate The tourism department will undertake seasonal monitoring of air, Tourism water, and noise and soil quality through an approved monitoring department agency. The parameters to be monitored, frequency and duration of monitoring as well as the locations to be monitored will be as per the Monitoring Plan prepared. 5.2 Adequate drainage of site area Permanent Minor The tourism department to ensure efficient flow of surface water Tourism and prevent water logging along the side of the roads and parking department lots. 5.3 Increased waste loads onto the Temporary Minor In line with the Government targets of coverage of all urban and Gram existing waste disposal facilities rural areas with environmentally safe solid waste management Panchayats (that are non conformant to the systems, the tourist destinations will be covered with integrated Government requirements for waste management facilities, including treatment and disposal, in SWM) line with the Solid Waste Handling Rules, 2000. 30

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

V. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)

A. Institutional Arrangements

72. The institutional arrangements specify the arrangements for the implementation of environmental provisions of the entire project, and include the proposed subproject also.

Project Management Unit (PMU) and Project Implementation Unit (PIU)

73. The Department of Tourism, Government of Uttarakhand is the Executing Agency (EA). Project Management Unit (PMU) will be established in Dehradun for the overall project management and Project Implementation Units (PIU) will be established for each of the three circuits. The proposed sub-project will be implemented by the PIU, Bhimtal. A Safeguards Specialist is proposed within the PMU, and will be responsible for implementation of the resettlement and environmental safeguard provisions. A Forest Conservation Specialist is also proposed in PMU and DSC to look the matters of forests in all the projects.

Project Management Consultant (PMC) and Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC)

74. Project Management Consultants (PMC) and Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC) are recruited to provide assistance to the PMU and PIUs respectively in project implementation. Within the PMC team an Environment Safeguards Specialist will provide overall direction for management of environmental issues, and will provide technical support to the PMU including implementation of the environmental requirements according to ADB requirements, and assist in monitoring impacts and mitigation measures associated with sub-projects. The Safeguards Specialist of the DSC team will be responsible for preparation of the Environmental Assessment documents in line with the EARF and supervise the implementation of the EMP provisions in the various sub-projects. The PMU, will oversee the implementation of the environmental provisions related to subproject implementation, its responsibilities include preparation and updating of IEEs consistent with the ADBs Environmental Assessment Guidelines and the environmental compliance requirements of the Government of Uttarakhand and the Government of India.

75. The DSC Safeguards Specialist will support environmental management functions including updating sub-project IEEs in respect to environmental management plans, assisting in preparing IEEs, and assist in monitoring impacts and mitigation measures associated with sub- projects. He/she will be required to include mitigation measures in designs where appropriate, and to specify other measures in construction contracts. Contractors will be required by their contracts to implement all specified mitigation, monitoring, and reporting assigned to contractors as presented in sub-project IEE. Environmental monitoring will be undertaken by the PMU supported by the DSC- Safeguards Specialist.

76. Towards addressing the environmental issues in the project components during design and implementation, the DSC will include provisions for inputs of an Environmental Specialist. In addition to addressing the issues related to environmental management in the project, the Environmental Specialist will play a central role in ensuring capability building on Environmental Management of the PMU/PIU, Contractor and Line Departments.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Naukuchiatal Tourism Committee

77. Naukuchiatal Tourism Committee (NTC) will be formed for ensuring successful project implementation and sustainability of project pertaining to amelioration of Lake Naukuchiatal. It is proposed that NTC can also be involved in ensuring successful project implementation of sustainability of the upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House as well. NTC will comprise members from activity groups, (boat association, hotel owners, restaurant owners etc) public representatives from project area villages and representatives from other project stakeholders namely Irrigation Department, KMVN, Lake Development Authority.

B. Environmental Management Plan

78. All works undertaken towards protection of environmental resources as part of the EMP and as part of good engineering practices while adhering to relevant specifications will be deemed to be incidental to works being carried out and no separate payment will be made unless otherwise specified explicitly. The costs towards environmental management as per EMP unless otherwise provided as a separate head, will be deemed to be part of the BoQ of the project. The scope of works of the contractor towards the implementation of the environmental provisions shall be as follows:

 Abide by all existing Environmental regulations and requirements of the Government of Uttarakhand and Government of India, during implementation,  Compliance with all mitigation measures and monitoring requirements set out in the environmental Management Plan (EMP)  Submission of a method statement detailing how the subproject EMP will be complied with as per the schedule of monitoring given in subsequent paragraphs.  Monitoring of project environmental performance and periodic submission of monitoring reports.  Compliance with all measures required for construction activities in line with the regulatory requirements and the guidelines set forth in the management plans for these areas.  Compliance of all safety rules and regulations applicable at work, and provision of adequate health and safety measures such as water, food, sanitation, personal protective equipment, workers insurance, and medical facilities.

79. The detailed provisions for specific environmental issues shall be as outlined in the Table 10. Key clauses are outlined in the following sections.

Debris Disposal . Waste is to be generated on account of demolition of existing kitchen building and during other construction activities.

. The contractor will, prior to start of construction operations, identify potential sites for disposal of construction debris, sites for general construction wastes. The contractor will obtain approval on identified sites from the Engineer of PIU and Supervision Consultant and disposal will be only after consent letter from the

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Engineer.

Precautions for protection of Environmental Measures . The Contractor shall ensure that construction activities do not result in any contamination of land or water by polluting substances.

. Unless otherwise provided in the specifications, the Contractor shall ensure that no trees or shrubs or other vegetation are felled or harmed except those required to be cleared for execution of the works. The Contractor shall protect trees and vegetation from damage to the satisfaction of the Engineer.

. In the conduct of cleaning activities and operation of equipment, the Contractor will utilize such practicable methods and devices as are reasonably available to control, prevent and otherwise minimize air/noise pollution.

Noise and Air Pollution

. All works will be carried out without unreasonable noise and air pollution. Subject and without prejudice to any other provision of the Contract and the law of the land and its obligation as applicable, the Contractor will take all precautions outlined in the EMP to avoid the air and noise pollution.

. The Contractor shall monitor the environmental parameters periodically as specified in the monitoring plan and report to the Engineer. The Contractor shall reduce the dust emission due to construction activities by regular water sprinkling in the affected areas.

. All the construction equipments and vehicles shall have Pollution Under Control (PUC) Certificate to ensure that no air pollution may be caused due to operation of their equipments and vehicles. All the construction equipment and vehicles should remain all time in good conditions up to satisfaction of site engineers.

. The Contractor shall indemnify and keep indemnified the Employer from and against any liability for damages on account of noise or other disturbance created while carrying out the work, and from and against all claims, demands, proceedings, damages, costs, charges, and expenses, whatsoever, in regard or in relation to such liability.

Occupational Health and Safety During Construction

. The Contractor shall, in accordance with the safety and health provisions specified in the EMP, provide workers with a safe and healthy working environment, in the work areas, through application of preventive and protective measures consistent with international good practice, as reflected in internationally recognized standards such as the ADB’s Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines. The borrower/client will take steps to prevent accidents, injury, and disease arising from, associated with, or occurring during the course of work by-  Providing preventive and protective measures, including modification, substitution, or elimination of hazardous conditions or substances;

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

 Providing appropriate equipment to minimize risks and requiring and enforcing its use;  Training workers and providing them with appropriate incentives to use and comply with health and safety procedures and protective equipment;  Documenting and reporting occupational accidents, diseases, and incidents; and  Having emergency prevention, preparedness, and response arrangements in place.  Provide first aid facilities in all the work sites and workers camp and having qualified first aider to give first aid at the time of any accident.  Contractor shall provide safe drinking water, clean eating and resting.  Contractor shall have prepared emergency response plan with full details and methods of emergency response during any accident and shall have and display the emergency Contact numbers at site.  Contractor should follow all the applicable rules and regulations for workers safety.

Post Construction Clearance

80. On completion of work, wherever applicable, the Contractor shall clear away and remove from the sites all constructional plant, surplus materials, rubbish, scaffoldings, and temporary works of every kind and leave the whole of the sites and works in a clean condition to the satisfaction of the Engineer.

C. Environmental Monitoring Plan

81. Environmental monitoring will be done during construction in three levels; namely monitoring development of project performance indicators done by the DSC Environmental Specialist, monitoring implementation of mitigation measures done by the Contractor; and overall regulatory monitoring of the environmental issues done by the PMU Environmental Specialist. The Environmental Monitoring Plan for the project is presented in Table-11. The proposed monitoring of all relevant environmental parameters, with a description of the sampling stations, frequency of monitoring, applicable standards and responsible agencies are presented.

Table11: Environmental Monitoring Plan S. Attributes Stage Parameters Location Frequency Responsibility No. to be Monitored 1 Debris Construction Safe disposal of Major Random checks Contractor /Construction Stage construction construction materials wastes including sites bituminous disposal wastes 2 Ambient Air Construction PM10, SO2, NO2, Major Once in a season Contractor, to be Quality Stage CO construction (except monitor through sites monsoons) for the engagement of entire construction agency approved

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

S. Attributes Stage Parameters Location Frequency Responsibility No. to be Monitored period under NABL Accreditation norm 3 Water quality Construction TDS, TSS, pH, Three Twice a year (pre- Contractor, to be stage DO, BOD, COD, Locations monsoon and monitor through Faecal Coliform, post- monsoon) engagement of Ammonia, for the entire agency approved Nitrogen, period of under NABL Organophosphat construction Accreditation norm es, 4 Noise Levels Construction Equivalent Day All Once in a season Contractor, to monitor and & Night Time Construction during through on approved Operation Noise Levels sites construction and Monitoring Agency Stage operation stages 5 Supply of Construction Provision of PPE All Continuous Contractor PPE Stage on site, Construction adequacy of sites equipment

D. Capacity Building

Institutional Strengthening

82. The Department of Tourism, Government of Uttarakhand is the Executing Agency (EA). Project Management Unit (PMU) will be established in Dehradun for the overall project management. This sub-project will be implemented by the PIU, Bhimtal. A Safeguards Specialist is proposed within the PMU, and will be responsible for implementation of the resettlement and environmental safeguard provisions. Project Management Consultants (PMC) and Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC) are recruited to provide assistance to the PMU/PIUs in project implementation. Within the PMC team a Safeguards Specialist will provide overall direction for management of environmental and social issues, and will provide technical support to the PMU including implementation of the environmental and resettlement requirements according to ADB requirements, and assist in monitoring impacts and mitigation measures associated with sub- projects. The Safeguards specialist of the DSC team will be responsible to assist in preparation of IEE and EMP report and supervise the implementation of the EMP provisions in the sub- projects. The PMU will oversee the implementation of the environmental provisions related to subproject implementation, consistent with the ADBs Environmental Assessment Guidelines and the environmental compliance requirements of the Government of Uttarakhand and the Government of India.

Training and Capacity Building

83. The Environmental Specialist of the PMC and DSC will provide the basic training required for environmental awareness followed by specific aspects of infrastructure improvement projects along with environmental implications for projects located within / in the vicinity of natural and cultural heritage sites. Specific modules customized for the available skill set will be devised after assessing the capabilities of the members of the Training Programme and the requirements of

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand the project. The entire training would cover basic principles of environmental assessment and management; mitigation plans and programmes, implementation techniques, monitoring methods and tools. The proposed training program along with the frequency of sessions is presented in Table 12 below.

Table 12: Training Modules for Environmental Management Training Form of Duration/ Programme Description Participants Conducting Training Location Agency A. Pre-Construction Stage Sensitization Introduction to Environment: Tourism / Forest / Workshop 1 Environmental Workshop Basic Concept of Roads / Culture Working Specialist of environment Environmental Department Day the PMC Regulations and Statutory Officials, Project requirements as per Director (PD) and Government of Environmental India and ADB Specialist (ES) of the PMU/PIU Session I Module I Introduction to Environment: PMU/PIU Lecture 1Working Safeguards Basic Concept of (including the ES) Day Specialist of environment Safeguards and Engineering the PMC Regulations and Statutory staff of the requirements as per Govt. of implementing India and ADB Guidelines on agencies cultural resources, Environmental considerations in planning, design and implementing projects

Module II Environmental components PMU/ PIU Workshop 1 Safeguards impacted in construction and (including Working Specialist of operation stages Activities the ES) and Day the PMC causing pollution during Engineering staff construction and operation of Tourism dept stages Environmental Management Environmental Provisions Implementation Arrangements Methodology of Assessment Good engineering practices to be integrated into contract documents Module III Improved Co-ordination with PMU/PIU Lecture / 1Working Safeguards other Departments: Statutory (including Interactive Day Specialist of the ES) and Permissions – Procedural Sessions the Engineering staff PMC Requirements Co-operation of & Coordination with other Tourism dept Departments.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Training Form of Duration/ Programme Description Participants Conducting Training Location Agency Module IV Environmental PMU/PIU Lecture / 2 Working Safeguards considerations (including the ES) Interactive days specialist of in planning, designing and and Engineering Sessions the PMC with implementing heritage staff of and site support from Tourism dept the buildings and conservation visits Conservation projects specialist of the PMC

Module V Environmental principles of Local Community Lecture / 1 Specialist eco-tourism (as per Groups, NGOs Interactive Working from DSC Uttarakhand eco tourism Sessions Day and PIU policies) and training and awareness building on Conservation and management aspects of the Naukuchiatal.

B. Construction Stage Session II Module VI Role during Construction- Engineers and Lecture / 1 Safeguards Roles and Responsibilities of staff of line Interactive Working Specialist of officials / contractors / departments of the Sessions Day the consultants towards DSC Government of protection of environment Implementation Uttarakhand, and Arrangements Monitoring PMU/PIU mechanisms (including the ES) Module VII Monitoring and Reporting Engineers and Lecture / 1 Safeguards System staff of Interactive Working Specialist of implementing Sessions Day the DSC agencies and PMU/PIU (including the ES) Session III Module VIII Skill upgrade on ecotourism Youth in the Site visits, 2 Tourism and nature guides villages in the interactive working department periphery, and Hospitality, Interpretational sessions days skills, micro- planning, other NGOs in the Biodiversity etc district

Notes: PMU = Project Management Unit; PIU = Project Implementation Unit; PMC = Project Management Consultant; DSC = Design and Supervision Consultant; ES = Environment Specialist; NGO= N on- government organization

E. Environmental Budget

84. As part of good engineering practices in the project, there have been several measures as erosion prevention, rehabilitation of borrow areas, safety, signage, provision of temporary drains, etc., the costs for which will be included in the design costs of specific subprojects.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Therefore, these items of costs have not been included in the IEE budget. Only those items not covered under budgets for construction are considered in the IEE budget.

85. This is a small construction project and there are no major structures to be constructed therefore it is not expected to cause much significant air, water and noise pollution. The main EMP cost will arise from monitoring of environmental parameters (air, water and noise).

86. The costs of personal protective equipments to construction workers shall be borne by contractor as part of conditions of contract. In addition the sources of funds for Mitigation measures during construction stage including monitoring during construction stage are also to be borne by the contractor. These are deemed to be included as part of the contract price amount quoted by the contractor for the works. The costs of components for monitoring in operation stage and the capacity building costs are to be funded by the PMU. The EMP cost is given in the Table 13.

Table 13: Environmental Budget S. Particulars Stage Unit Total Rate Cost (INR) Source of No. number (INR) fund A. Mitigation Measures 1 Site Fencing Construction Per 150 2,000 3,00,000 Contract running or meter Sub -Total (A) 3,00,000 B. Monitoring Measures During Construction Period 1 Water quality Construction Per 12 samples 8,000 96,000 Contractor sample {Twice a year (pre monsoon and Post Monsoon) at three locations (Surface and bottom)} 2 Air quality Construction Per 12 nos. 9,000 108,000 Contractor monitoring sample {Once per season at three locations for pre- monsoon and post- monsoon season} 3 Noise Levels – Construction Per 18 samples 2,000 36,000 Contractor silence zones Sample {Once in a season for 3 seasons at three locations}

C. Monitoring Measures During Operation Phase 1 Noise Levels – Operation Per 6 samples 2,000 12,000 O & M silence zones Sample {Once in a season for 3 contractor seasons at three locations}

Sub -Total (B+C) 2,52,000 D. Capacity Building (All the workshops and trainings will be held in Bhimtal)

1 Sensitization Pre- L.S 1,00,000 PMU Workshop Construction 2 Training Session Pre- L.S 4,00,000 PMU I Construction 3 Training Session Construction L.S 2,00,000 DSC II

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

S. Particulars Stage Unit Total Rate Cost (INR) Source of No. number (INR) fund 4 Training Session Construction L.S 5,00,000

Sub -Total (D) 12,00,000

Total Rupees seventeen lakh fifty two thousand only (A+B+C+D) 17,52,000

F. Environmental Monitoring and Reporting

87. The PMU will monitor and measure the progress of EMP implementation. The monitoring activities will be corresponding with the project’s risks and impacts and will be identified in the EIAs/IEEs for the subprojects. In addition to recording information of the work, deviation of work components from original scope, the PMU and PIU will undertake site inspections and document review to verify compliance with the EMP and progress toward the final outcome.

88. DSC will submit monthly monitoring and implementation reports to PIU, who will take follow-up actions, if necessary. PIU will submit the quarterly monitoring and implementation reports to PMU who will then submit to the PD. The PMU will submit semi-annual monitoring reports to ADB. Project budgets will reflect the costs of monitoring and reporting requirements. For subprojects likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts during operation, reporting will continue at the minimum on an annual basis. Monitoring reports will be posted in a location accessible to the public.

89. For projects likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts, the EA will retain qualified and experienced external experts to verify its monitoring information. The EA will document monitoring results, identify the necessary corrective actions, and reflect them in a corrective action plan. The EA, in each quarter, will study the compliance with the action plan developed in the previous quarter. Compliance with loan covenants will be screened by the EA.

90. ADB will review project performance against the EA’s commitments as agreed in the legal documents. The extent of ADB's monitoring and supervision activities will be commensurate with the Project’s risks and impacts. Monitoring and supervising of social and environmental safeguards will be integrated into the project performance management system. ADB will monitor projects on an ongoing basis until a project completion report is issued. ADB will carry out the following monitoring actions to supervise project implementation:

o conduct periodic site visits for projects with adverse environmental or social impacts; o conduct supervision missions with detailed review by ADB’s safeguard specialists/ officers or consultants for projects with significant adverse social or environmental impacts; o review the periodic monitoring reports submitted by EA to ensure that adverse impacts and risks are mitigated as planned and as agreed with ADB; o work with EA to rectify to the extent possible any failures to comply with their safeguard commitments, as covenanted in the legal agreements, and exercise remedies to re- establish compliance as appropriate; and o prepare a project completion report that assesses whether the objective and desired outcomes of the safeguard plans have been achieved, taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of monitoring.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

VI. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

A. Process for Consultation followed

91. During Project preparation, consultations have been held with the District Administration, Department of Tourism, KMVN, LDA, public representatives of project area villages, Hotel Owners, villagers of concerned various villages in vicinity of sub-project site and tourists on project orientation, issues pertaining to conservation and management of lake ecosystem, land acquisition problems and addressing the current gaps in provision of basic services and improvement of tourist infrastructure. These consultations (Table-14) provided inputs in identification of the felt needs of the communities, and the relevant stakeholders. Photographs of consultations are attached as Annexure-6 with this report.

Table 14: Consultations with Stakeholders S. Place Date Consulted Issues discussed / Output Received No. persons/ Community 1. LDA 05.04.2013 Mr. C. M. Shah and Project Orientation and collected Office, team, Executive information regarding Naukuchiatal and Nainital Engineer tourism problems 2. DM Office, 14.05.2013 Ms Nidhi Mani First Expert project Monitoring Nainital Tripathi, IAS, DM Committee meeting regarding project Nainital orientation and land acquisition and legal issues for implementation of project activities. 3. New TRH, 04.06.2013 Manger, New TRH Appraise the project activity to the local Siloti and Local community. Received Community feedback/perception of community in successful implementation of the project. 4. Chanoti & 04.06.2013 Local Community Appraise the project activity to the local Siloti and Activity groups community. Received feedback/ perception of community in successful implementation of the project. (Report enclosed as Annex 7) 5. KMVN, 07.06.2013 Mr. Deepak Rawat, First meeting regarding project Nainital IAS, MD, KMVN orientation and land acquisition and role of KMVN in successful implementation of the project activities

6. Siloti 25.06.2013 Local Community Discussions with local community and Activity Groups related to well being ranking and piloting of baseline survey. 7. Siloti and 30.06.2013 Local Community Collected information about tourism Chanoti and tourists facilities and services available in the vicinity of Naukuchiatal/ TRH Parichay 8. Lake view 02.07.2013 Stakeholders Meeting with hotel owners and activity resort and groups about problems faced by them Chanoti and their participation in the project activities.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

S. Place Date Consulted Issues discussed / Output Received No. persons/ Community 9. Thapalia 03.07.2013 Local community Identification of potential livelihood mehragaon opportunities and receiving their perception and suggestion for subproject. 10. DM Office, 05.07.2013 Mr. A. S. Hyangki, First Expert project Monitoring Nainital DM, Nainital Committee meeting regarding project orientation and land acquisition and legal issues for implementation of project activities. 11. TRH 23.07.2013 Mr. Shirish Singh, Project Orientation and issues related to Parichay GM, KMVN land acquisition for installation of compressor in KMVN site. 12. TRH 20.12.2013 Various DPR Orientation and issues related to Parichay stakeholders environmental impact, public participation and project implementation. (Report enclosed as Annex 8)

92. NOC from Kumaiun Mandal Vikash Nigam (KMVN) for resettlement of employees is attached as Annexure 9.

B. Future Consultation and Information Disclosure

93. To ensure continued public participation, provisions to ensure regular and continued stakeholder participation, at all stages during the project design and implementation is proposed. A grievance redress cell will be set up within the PIU and PMU to register grievances of the people regarding technical, social and environmental aspects. This participatory process will ensure that all views of the people are adequately reviewed and suitably incorporated in the design and implementation process. Further, to ensure an effective disclosure of the project proposals to the stakeholders, an extensive project awareness campaign will be carried out.

94. For the information and benefit of the community the summary of IEE will be translated in the local language (Hindi) and made available at: (i) Office of the PIU/PMU; and, (ii) Office of the District Magistrate, Nainital and other relevant line departments in the District. These copies will be made available free of cost to any person seeking information on the same. Hard copies of the IEE will be available in the PMU/PIU as well as the district library at Nainital, and accessible to citizens as a means to disclose the document and at the same time creating wider public awareness. On demand, the person seeking information can obtain a hard copy of the complete IEE document at the cost of photocopy from the office of the PMU/PIU, on a written request and payment for the same to the Project Director. Electronic version of the IEE will be placed in the official website of the Tourism Department and the website of ADB after approval of the documents by Government and ADB. This will create awareness of the project implementation among the public. C. Grievance Redress Mechanism

95. The affected person/aggrieved party can give their grievance verbally or in written to the

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand local grievances committee. Grievances of affected person will first be brought to the attention of the implementing NGO who can resolve the issue at site level. If the matter is not solved within 7 days period by the NGO or PIU, it will be brought to the Grievance Redress Committee constituted for the purpose in PIU. This GRC shall discuss the issue in its monthly meeting and resolve the issues within one month of time after receiving the grievance. If the matter is not resolved by GRC at PIU level within stipulated time, it shall be referred to GRC at PMU level by Executive Engineer of PIU.

96. GRC at PMU shall discuss the issue and try to resolve it and inform the PIU accordingly. If the matter is not resolved by the GRC at PMU level within one month of time, the aggrieved person/party can bring the matter to The Court of Law. The PIU shall keep records of all grievances received including contact details of complainant, date of receiving the complaint, nature of grievance, agreed corrective actions and the date these were affected and final outcome. The grievance redress process is shown below.

Composition and functions of GRC

97. Local Grievance Committee.(LGC) – In this LGC has worked with NGO, SHG, Line Agency, representative of Gram Panchayat ,Special invitee.

98. Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) at PIU- In each PIU there shall be one GRC, which will include Project Manager (PIU), District Tourist Officer of Department of Tourism of Govt. Of Uttarakhand, Community Development Officer of PIU, nominated representative of District Magistrate and nominated representative committee shall be headed by Project Manager (PIU). The committee will meet at least once in every month. Agenda of meeting shall be circulated to all the members and affected persons/aggrieved party along with venue, date and time; informed in written at least 7 days in advance of meeting. The matters shall remain with GRC at PIU level for one month and if grievance is not resolved within this time period, the matter shall be referred to GRC at PMU.

99. GRC within Environmental and Social Management Cell (ESMC) at PMU- There shall be one GRC in PMU. The matters not resolved by the GRC at PIU level within one month shall come under GRC at PMU. GRC at PMU will include Community Development Expert of PMU, Safeguard Specialist of PMU and Additional Project Director (APD) of PMU. The Committee shall be headed by APD of PMU. This committee shall look the matters, which are referred to and not resolved by GRC at PIU level. If the matter is not resolved by the GRC at PMU level within one month of time, the aggrieved person/party can bring the matter to The Executive Committee/State Level Empowered Committee (SLEC).

Approach to GRC 100. Affected person/aggrieved party can approach to GRC for redress of his/their grievances through any of the following modes- (a) Web based: A separate corner will be developed at the program website so that public / community/ affected person can register their complaint in the online column. (b) Telecom based: A toll free no. Will be issued by the PMU/ PIU so that general public can register their complaint through telephone / mobile phone to the PIU/PMU office. (c) Through implementing NGO: The local representative of the NGO appointed for the

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

purpose will collect the problems & issues of the community or affected person and pass on the same to PIU / PMU.

Figure 1: Grievance Redress Mechanism in IDIPT, Uttarakhand Note: 1. LGC - NGO, SHG, Line Agency, Representative of Gram Panchayat, Special invitee 2. GRC – PM, CDO, Engineer, DFO, DTO, SDM 3. GRC in Environment and Social Management Cell (ESMC) – PMU (APD, SS, CDS, FS), PMC (EE, CDE)

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

VII. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

101. The proposed components of Building and Environmental Upgradation of Parichay Tourist Rest House are in line with the sub-project selection criteria for the IDIPT. The subproject conforms to all GoI, GoUK and ADB regulations, policies, and standards including all necessary government permits and clearances.

102. The significance of the environmental impacts will be more due to the construction related impacts. It is to be noted that the resultant potential impacts from these proposals can be offset through provision of proven mitigation measures during the design and adoption of good engineering practices during construction and implementation. Further, the provision of environmental infrastructure will better the environmental conditions and minimize the pollution related and aesthetic quality near the tourist areas and the other destinations.

103. The specific management measures laid down in the IEE will effectively address any adverse environmental impacts due to the sub-project. The effective implementation of the measures proposed will be ensured through the building up of capacity towards environmental management within the PMU supplemented with the technical expertise of a Safeguards Specialist as part of the DSC Consultants. Further, the environmental monitoring plans provide adequate opportunities towards course correction to address any residual impacts during construction or operation stages.

VIII. CONCLUSIONS 104. The IEE carried out for the sub-project show that the proposed sub-components will result in net environmental benefits in terms of enhanced tourism facilities and revenue generation, and that any adverse environmental impact can be addressed through proper location, planning, and design of the proposed sub-project; control of construction activity and mitigation measures. The EMP provided for mitigation of all identified short term impacts and the contract clauses for the environmental provisions will be part of the civil works contracts. Further, the proposed designs have been consulted with the stakeholders and no significant issues requiring redress in terms of environmental safeguards exist.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

ANNEXURE- I

RAPID ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (REA) CHECKLIST

Instructions:

i. The project team completes this checklist to support the environmental classification of a project. It is to be attached to the environmental categorization form and submitted to the Environment and Safeguards Division (RSES) for endorsement by the Director, RSES and for approval by the Chief Compliance Officer. ii. This checklist focuses on environmental issues and concerns. To ensure that social dimensions are adequately considered, refer also to ADB's (a) checklists on involuntary resettlement and Indigenous Peoples; (b) poverty reduction handbook; (c) staff guide to consultation and participation; and (d) gender checklists.

iii. Answer the questions assuming the “without mitigation” case. The purpose is to identify potential impacts. Use the “remarks” section to discuss any anticipated mitigation measures.

Country/Project Title: IDIPT: India/ Uttarakhand, Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Sector Division: SAUW (South Asia Urban Development and Water Division)

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS A. Project Siting: Is the project area adjacent to or within any of the following areas?  Densely populated?  Presently the proposed project area is not densely populated  Heavy with development activities?  No as such development activities nearby the project site  Adjacent to or within any  The area lies in the lake region of Uttarakhand environmentally sensitive areas? having several fresh water lakes and rich in bio-diversity.  Cultural heritage site  No  Protected Area  No  Wetland  Naukuchital Lake located adjacent to TRH Parichya  Mangrove   Estuarine   Buffer zone of protected area   Special area for protecting  biodiversity  Bay  B. Potential Environmental Impacts Will the Project cause….  Impacts on the sustainability of  During construction demolition waste is associated sanitation and solid waste expected as solid waste which shall be

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS disposal systems and their disposed or reused as per approved interactions with other urban management plan services. The sanitation and solid waste related problems includes urine and dung of ponies, garbage and plastics etc. These impacts shall result in the event of the sanitation and solid waste management systems not being handled properly in the proposed sites. After the project it will be considered as priority basis  Deterioration of surrounding  It is envisaged that due to increase in tourism environmental conditions due to related infrastructure development, more rapid urban population growth, entrepreneurs like hotel, lodge, home-stay, commercial and industrial activity, shops etc will be developed resulting to rapid and increased waste generation to urban population growth, commercial and the point that both manmade and industrial activity, and increased waste natural systems are overloaded and generation. the capacities to manage these But development will be as per protection and systems are overwhelmed? control management plan of lake area development  Degradation of land and ecosystems  Not applicable as per nature of work (e.g. loss of wetlands and wild lands, coastal zones, watersheds and forests)?  Dislocation or involuntary  Not applicable resettlement of people  Degradation of cultural property, and  Not applicable loss of cultural heritage and tourism revenues?  Occupation of low-lying lands,  Not applicable floodplains and steep hillsides by squatters and low- income groups, and their exposure to increased health hazards and risks due to pollutive industries?  Water resource problems (e.g.  Location is nearby the Lake. Proper design depletion/degradation of available related to waste water management and water supply, deterioration for application of mitigation during construction surface and ground water quality, and operation will protect surface water and pollution of receiving waters? quality  Air pollution due to urban emissions?  Not applicable  Risks and vulnerabilities related to  Only physical hazards to workers due to occupational health and safety due to accidents may come across during physical, chemical and biological construction for which safety of workers hazards during project construction should be taken in priority. and operation?  Road blocking and temporary  Road blocking and flooding is not expected in flooding due to land excavation the project during rainy season?

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS  Noise and dust from construction  Minor impact envisaged during the activities? construction and post construction activity due to regular functioning of compressors. Adoption of mitigation measures shall effectively address such impact during construction.  Traffic disturbances due to  No as such impact is expected construction material transport and wastes?  Temporary silt runoff due to  Since some of activities in Parichay Guest construction? House shall be done close to Naukuchiatal Lake, there is a potential of temporary silt runoff to the lake. Adoption of mitigation measures shall effectively address such impact during construction.  Hazards to public health due to  No significant ambient, household and ambient, household and occupational pollution is expected occupational pollution, thermal inversion, and smog formation?  Water depletion and/or degradation?  Water depletion or degradation is not expected in this project  Overpaying of ground water, leading  No excessive use of underground water is to land subsidence, lowered ground required which may lead to depletion of ground water table, and salinization? water table or salinization  Contamination of surface and ground  During construction time waste disposal shall waters due to improper waste be done in legitimate manner and will not disposal? cause water pollution Due to increase in tourist inflow at operation phase, it is envisaged that garbage, ponies dung and other solid waste may increase which may result to contamination of surface and ground waters. Adoption of mitigation measures like formulation of environmental laws, developing solid waste management systems like composting etc. shall effectively address such impact during construction and post construction.  Pollution of receiving waters resulting  Construction activities will not cause surface in amenity losses, fisheries and water pollution and loss of fisheries marine resource depletion, and health problems?  Large population influx during project  Only small number of workers shall execute the construction and operation that construction works, therefore no burden on causes increased burden on social social infrastructure and services is expected infrastructure and services (such as water supply and sanitation systems)?  Social conflicts if workers from other  No social conflicts is expected due to workers regions or countries are hired?  Risks to community health and safety  Not expected

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS due to the transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of materials such as explosives, fuel and other chemicals during operation and construction?  Community safety risks due to both  Renovation work will be done for Rest accidental and natural hazards, house. During construction protection especially where the structural measures will be applied for visitors and elements or components of the rest house boarder. Rest house will be project are accessible to members of closed for the public during internal work the affected community or where their failure could result in injury to the community throughout project construction, operation and decommissioning?

Climate Change and Disaster Risk Yes No Remarks Questions The following questions are not for environmental categorization. They are included in this checklist to help identify potential climate and disaster risks.  Is the Project area subject to  The project area is located in an area prone to hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, cloud bursts, earthquakes etc as it is floods, landslides, tropical cyclone located in the seismic Zone IV as per IS winds, storm surges, tsunami or 1893:2002. volcanic eruptions and climate changes (see Appendix I)?  Could changes in temperature,  The project area lies in the hilly region having precipitation, or extreme events landslides a major environmental problem during patterns over the Project lifespan monsoons. In case of such events, the road affect technical or financial blockage may hamper project progress. sustainability (e.g., increased extreme rainfall increases flooding, damaging proposed infrastructure)?  Are there any demographic or socio-  No economic aspects of the Project area that are already vulnerable (e.g., high incidence of marginalized populations, rural-urban migrants, illegal settlements, ethnic minorities, women or children)?  Could the Project potentially  Due to development of tourism infrastructure, it is increase the climate or disaster envisaged that tourist inflow in the area will vulnerability of the surrounding area increase resulting to increase traffic and noise (e.g., by paving vulnerable pollution in the area. Also more enterprises like groundwater recharge areas, or guest houses, lodges, home-stays and shops are using water from a vulnerable source that is relied upon by many likely to come. Proper systems need to be user groups, or encouraging developed to address such problems in future. settlement in earthquake zones)? Development control plan needs to be followed for future development ANNEXURE- 2

PROJECT LOCATION MAP

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

ANNEXURE 3 PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Entrance View of TRH Parichay Meeting with Patwari

Back Side View of the Main Building Existing Landscaping

Existing Shoreline Drainage Facilities

Existing Restaurant Existing Toilets

ANNEXURE 4

No objection certificate from Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd or KMVN

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

ANNEXURE 5

WATER QUALITY TESTING REPORT

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY REPORT

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

NOISE MONITORING REPORT

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

ANNEXURE 6

STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PHOTOGRAPHS

Public Consultation at Chanoti Village Public Consultation at Chanoti Village

Public Consultation at Siloti Village Public Consultation at Siloti Village

Public Consultation with Hotel Owners at Thapalia Mehragaon Consultation with Patwari

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Public Consultation at TRH Parichay on 20-12-2013 Public Consultation at TRH Parichay on 20-12-2013

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

ANNEXURE- 7

Public Consultation with Local Community at Naukuchiatal (adjacent to TRH Parichay) on 04.06.2013

A team experts from WAPCOS and PIU Bhimtal organized a pubic consultation meeting with the local community at Naukuchiatal Lake premises (Siloti and Chanoti) dated 04.06.2013 at 1100 hrs. Total 33 participants from village Thapalia Mehragaon, Chanoti and Siloti attended the meeting. The List of participants is enclosed.

Initially WAPCOS briefed the local community regarding the project Overview and tentative scope and implementation strategy of the project Ämelioration of Lake Naukuchiatal and development of Surrounding environment". WAPCOS experts invited comments from the local community and the following points were discussed-

1. To develop a walking trail all along the shore of the lake to promote tourism which involves land acquisition issues from Private owners.

2. To develop an institution for solid waste management. At present the solid waste generated is being collected by the local community and burnt in an open pit excavated uphill. But during the rainy season many difficulties arise and ultimately the solid waste goes into the lake.

3. During the rainy season the soil erosion takes place and gets collected at the road and goes into the lake.

4. Ducks are being cultivated in the lake but there are no shelter and food facilities provided as of now.

5. To develop the existing access road facility to Sidh mandir which includes ancient caves.

6. Beautification of kamal tal.

7. Deficiency of the no of Life jackets for the boats.

8. Development and management of Public toilets which are not in the near vicinity. (Some exist in the uphill which are never used by the tourists).

9. A helipad exists in the vicinity of the lake which can be developed as a public park.

10. Need for development of parking facility.

11. Illumination of the lake surroundings.

12. Strengthening of local community.

13. Development of summer houses.

14. Improvement of drinking water facility.

15. A dirt road exists from Naukuchiatal to Amritpur (Near HMT Colony which is very near to Haldwani). As of now the tourist visiting lake Naukuchiatal has to come and travel back via bhimtal and reaches haldwani. If this road is developed the tourist can travel from Haldwani-Nainital-Bhimtal-Naukuchiatal- Haldwani which becomes a circuit

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

ANNEXURE- 8

Report on Public Consultation Meeting, Naukuchiatal, 20 December 2013.

Participants: (List attached)

Approximately 45 persons attended the meeting, held in the grounds of Parichay Guest House, Naukuchiatal from 11.30 am till 1.30 pm. They included:

1. Representatives of 4 villages, Chanauti, Silloti, Thapeliya Mehragaon and Naul

- Representatives of Gram Panchayats

- Women’s Group

- Representatives of Boating Association

- Representatives of farmers community

- Representatives of transport and tourism operators

- Students

- Representatives of civil society

2. Representative of KMVN: GM, KMVN and team

3. Manager, Parichay Guest House

4. APD, DRDA, Nainital

5. Representatives of PIU, Bhimtal

6. Representatives of DSC, Bhimtal, Dr Yaaminey Mubayi, PRIMA ACS, New Delhi

Discussion Points:

As per the agenda, the meeting began with an introduction to the projects, viz. the programme for aeration and improvement of Naukuchiatal lake via installation of an aeration plant, and the restoration and adaptive reuse project for TRH Parichay. The participatory approach involving consultations with local communities to achieve a consensus based roadmap for development in the area, was explained and discussed.

It was explained to the gathering that the aim of the project was to not simply upgrade tourism infrastructure, but also enable visitors to stay in the vicinity for a longer period and create greater employment and revenue generation opportunities for the local communities

The significance of TRH Parichay as a historic building and its association with the local communities over the past century was acknowledged and supported by the gathering. It was considered appropriate that the complex should become a vehicle for showcasing and promoting the local culture following restoration. Thus, the choice of TRH Parichay as a focal point for various programmes and activities that would have a greater involvement of local communities, build local livelihoods opportunities and become a platform for greater interaction between visitors and community members, was an argument that was received with approval and enthusiasm by the participants. 65

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

The details of the plans for restoration and reuse of the Parichay complex, were discussed as follows:

1. Curio Counter: A shopping counter at Parichay Guest House would provide an appropriate window for sale of locally manufactured Kumaoni products and would generate income as well as encourage diversification of agricultural produce in the area. The products for display and sale at the Curio Counter should include locally manufactured crafts products, including bamboo products, aepen paintings, knitted items and textiles as also food and agricultural products including rice, dals, mandua flour, spices, ghee and dairy products and chutneys and jams. These products could be sourced through the activities of SHGs set up by the DRDA, as also through collaborations with local NGOs working in the area. Training in jam and chutney making, organic farming and textiles and bamboo work can be provided under the programme in collaboration with appropriate institutions. The Curio Counter could be managed by the existing staff of the complex, although training in online accounts, stock keeping and updating of the website should be provided to them. The proposals were received with approval by the gathering.

2. Cafeteria/Restaurant – “Kumaoni Rasoi”: It was debated whether selected Kumaoni items should be catered by a local women’s SHG, the food cooked in their homes and transported to the Parichay complex, or else a cooking counter be provided in the existing kitchen for the SHG members to cook on site. The viability of providing Kumaoni dishes to visitors, in addition to the regular menu was also discussed. The following solutions emerged from the discussion:

- To begin with, a simple questionnaire should be circulated amongst existing visitors regarding their preference for Kumaoni dishes as a food choice.

- Taking the feedback for at least one month, if even 50% visitors expressed a positive desire for the dishes, a menu choice of a pre-fixed Kumaoni thali with about 4-5 items, may be offered to visiting groups.

- Timings for serving the Kumaoni thali should be fixed to avoid inconvenience to the catering SHG.

- Initially the food may be cooked in the homes and transported to the complex kitchen daily for serving. If there is a significant increase in orders, a cooking counter on site may be envisaged.

- The SHG should be sub-contracted by KMVN directly. Training in catering, hygiene and presentation via a local hotel management institute should be provided to the SHG.

3. Amphitheatre: The participants unanimously supported the idea of cultural performances of Kumaoni dance and music forms like Chhaliya, Jhora, Jaagar, Ramaul etc. They were appreciative of the idea of a Cultural Calendar involving local festivals like Harela and Sharadotsav, with regular performances which would be open to the local village communities. The events should be ticketed and rates can be varied based on online booking by visitors, with discounts being given to resident guests. Local communities, especially schoolchildren, should be encouraged to attend via concessional rates.

The concerns expressed by the women’s group, especially by senior member Jeevanti Devi, largely involved their financial vulnerability and inability to invest personal money in a business venture. They were assured that following their organisation and registration as a SHG, they would have access to financial assistance in terms of any credit requirement via DRDA schemes and the local Grameen Bank, and would not be required to offer any personal funds. They enthusiastically supported proposals for training and were open to capacity building measures.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

The second major project discussed at the meeting was the aeration plant and the environmental issues concerning the Naukuchiatal lake. A senior community member, Shri S.D. Sharma, explained the historical background of various measures to promote fisheries development in the lake. He stated that traditionally, species like Mahasher were naturally found in the lake. About 2 decades ago, a new species, Grass Carp, was introduced primarily to consume excess weeds in the lake. This was a destructive species which also consumes various beneficial grasses and plants that were necessary food for the valuable species, as also providing oxygen required by the fish. Thus, during winters, due to low oxygen in the deeper parts, the fish was forced to come to the surface to breathe where they were caught and killed by local fishermen. This led to a great depletion of valuable fish stock.

The participants proposed a multi-pronged approach consisting of various measures to improve the environmental health of the lake, in addition to the aeration plant, which would in principle, be a useful measure. These are:

1. Remove the Grass Carp, as it is a destructive species creating environmental imbalance in the lake.

2. Plant beneficial plants and grasses for oxygenation and provision of food for the valuable species.

3. Desilting of the lake is required, as there is a lot of silt, dead leaves and malba from construction activities around the lake. This is harmful to the fish life in the water.

4. Traditionally, there was a system of overflow from the lake that enhanced the oxygen content of the water. This should be restored.

5. The overflow discharge channel from the lake had created the subordinate water body called Kamal Taal (Lake of Lotuses), which had been silted over and destroyed in recent times. This should be restored, as it is a valuable collection of species of lotus and a tremendous attraction for visitors. This point was unanimously endorsed by the community.

The leader of the Boatmen’s Association, Mr Paladiya, suggested that a walking trail be developed around the lake, to showcase the biodiversity in the area. He explained that there should be controls on construction in the vicinity of the lake, as it was damaging the environment.

Another suggestion by the community was that roads in the area should be improved and upgraded to attract visitors.

The community was open to the idea of home stay and home food outlets, provided adequate regulations were put in place to protect the safety of the village settlements, as also ensure an authentic experience for the discerning visitors.

They were enthusiastic about organising environmental and cultural awareness campaigns to highlight the rich cultural and environmental resources of the region.

The meeting ended with a vote of thanks by the Team Leader of DSC, Bhimtal.

Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Upgradation of Tourist Facilities at TRH Parichay, Uttarakhand

Annexure - 9