(Appendix 1A) Translation from Appendix 1

(Appendix 1A) Translation from Appendix 1 4.1 The negotiations and other developments on the territorial issue of the Cyprus problem. I will start with the issue that arose concerning reimbursement of Larnaca Lapithou vilage under G / C command. The return of the community Larnaca Lapithou under G / C management was considered for granted, as it was included in all of Cyprus settlement plans prepared by the UN and this plan was accepted by the T / C at the referendum of 2004. On June 21, 2015, we had some information that during the last negotiations it has been agreed in complete secrecy to exclude the return of the villages of Larnaca Lapithou, Agridaki, Sysklipos and St. Ermolaos. Immediately the community of Larnaca Lapithou was mobilized and had meetings with Government Officials and Party Leaders demanding, in vain, their various return under G / C command. This mobilization of the community of Larnaka Lapithou demanding their return, caused a strong reaction from the Municipality of Kythreas and the Coordinating Committee of the wider region Kythreas, as expressed in their relevant publication in the newspaper Phileleftheros on 08.11.2015, "APPENDIX 3 and 3A '[the letters, clarifications, comments and related publications on the subject are in My file, the folder "Recent letters for the return of Larnaca Lapithou']. With this development, indications were given that they were behind the conspiracy, to prevent the return of Larnaca Lapithou and the surrounding area, indulging in favoritism obtained in support from political and / or religious leaders, to achieve their sinister objectives. It seems that when negotiations started on the territorial issue, our leadership rushed to concede to the exclusion of the return of Larnaca Lapithou and the wider region, in exchange for the return of other regions as requested by Kythrea. What could not be achieved by Turkey before the referendum, because of the persistence of the United Nations, our Leadership rushed to offer, voluntarily and effortlessly, for the region of Larnaca Lapithou to stay under T / C command for a second time? The first time was in 1976, when our Leadership delivered the map with the regions they proposed to stay under T / C command and which included all the villages of Kyrenia District. So the citizens of our region were renounced twice by our own "Leadership" voluntarily and effortlessly..Who gave you the right to deprive us from the return to our ancestral homes, especially the second time when this was managed after the long struggle of the people of Kyrenia District? Now we are told that it is difficult to obtain the return of our region in G / C command. But when you offered voluntarily to Turkey what they did not manage to achieve with their own efforts, you expect that it will be easy to rectify? Ealo the Larnaca Lapithou, ealo the temple of Narnakiou Neptune, ealo the dedications to the goddess Athena for the battles conducted in the region between troops of Ptolemy and Antigonus, ealo the monastery of Our Lady of clean, Saint Dimitrianos, ealo religious and cultural our heritage ealo the herritage, the struggles and sacrifices of our ancestors, ealo the sacrifices of Stelios Mavromatis and Evagoras Pallikarides, whose soul and spirit are deeply rooted in their origin in Larnaca Lapithou. How can you gentlemen handle our national issues with such frivolity? These Free Union Associations, presenting themselves as representatives of all provincial refugees of the region specified by their names, are actually a creation of Circuit establishment to trap and control the voice of refugees [see related comments by Alecos Constantinides, for unenslaved freedom clubs in the newspaper. "ALETHIA" of 25 and 26 August 1990, photocopies pp. 211 & 212 of the attached file,].Now they crawl after religious and political Leaders to ensure by favoritism the return of refugees in their region. If you think that the struggle for the return and restoration of the rights of refugees is conducted behind the scenes of the networked establishment with (Μέσο) and favoritism, then this is a terrible predicament of our state and our society. The Kyrenia people succeeded to extricate their voice from the networked establishment and conducted a genuine and teamed struggle, for the problems of the invasion to be presented inside and outside our borders and demand the vindication of our people and the return to our homes. Details about the struggle of Keryneioton can be obtained from the files or from the USB which contains written material, photographs, recordings, videos e.t.c. which are kept in the offices of the Metropolis of Kyrenia. It seems that this struggle of Keryneioton was valued by the International Community and as a result, nine villages in our province were included in all UN plans to return under G/C command. You gentlemen, who gave you the right to obstruct our Return? You have every right to follow the path you choose, but you have no right to intervene in the struggles of Keryneioton and obstruct their return. We were told that if information is given about the territorial issue, it will cause civil war. If the aforementioned worries and concerns are verified, and the content of the new agreement, instead of being based on principles and values, will contain the element of unfair treatment and favoritism, then what should you expect? If you sacrifice the return of this historic area of Larnaca Lapithou, with the significant geographical value it contains, in order to secure some coastal areas where businessmen would rush to take advantage of, then what is this solution? Unfortunately all this is evidence that we are not negotiating with due responsibility for ensuring a fair and honorable settlement. .

Load more