DOCSLIB.ORG

Orchard Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orchard Environmental Assessment ORCHARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002 For Further Information Contact: Jeff Walter District Ranger Clackamas River Ranger District Estacada Ranger Station 595 NW Industrial Way Estacada, OR 97023 (503) 630-6861 Responsible Official: Gary L. Larsen Forest Supervisor Mt. Hood National Forest 16400 Champion Way Sandy OR 97055 (503) 668-1700 Orchard Page 1 CHAPTER I. .............................................................................................................................................3 A. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................3 B. Desired Future Condition................................................................................................................3 C. Purpose and Need............................................................................................................................5 D. Scoping............................................................................................................................................6 E. Issues ...............................................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER II. - ALTERNATIVES AND DESIGN CRITERIA...............................................................8 Design Criteria .....................................................................................................................................9 Map .....................................................................................................................................................13 Comparison of Alternatives with Purpose and Need.................................................................................14 Comparison of Alternatives with Issues ....................................................................................................15 CHAPTER III. - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.................................................................................16 A. Watershed and Fisheries (Issue #1 & 2) .......................................................................................16 B. Late-successional Reserves (LSR) (Issue #3) ..............................................................................21 C. Economics (Issue #4) ....................................................................................................................22 D. Coarse Woody Debris (Issue #5) ..................................................................................................23 E. Botany ...........................................................................................................................................24 F. Wildlife..........................................................................................................................................25 G. Soils...............................................................................................................................................28 H. Management of Competing and Unwanted Vegetation................................................................30 I. Air Quality.....................................................................................................................................33 J. Heritage Resources........................................................................................................................34 K. Scenery..........................................................................................................................................34 L. Other..............................................................................................................................................35 CHAPTER IV. - CONSULTATION WITH OTHERS..........................................................................36 CHAPTER V. - LIST OF PREPARERS ................................................................................................37 Appendix 1 – RESPONSE TO COMMENTS...........................................................................................38 Appendix 2 – Other Documents ........................................................................................Separate Volume Orchard Page 2 CHAPTER I. A. Introduction This Environmental Assessment (EA) describes the analysis of project proposals in the Memaloose Creek subdrainage of the South Fork Clackamas River watershed. This EA is an update from the original version that was delayed by court cases that have since been resolved. This EA has been updated from the original to include new information and to add clarification in response to comments received. The appendix includes public involvement results, biological evaluations and assessments, economic analysis and a cultural resource report. The planning area is located approximately 30 miles south east of Portland, Oregon. The location of the proposed activities are in sections 4, 5 and 8 of T.5 S., R.5 E.; Willamette Meridian. This assessment is tiered to the Mt. Hood National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (hereafter referred to as the Mt. Hood Forest Plan). That document was amended by the1994 Record of Decision and Standards and Guidelines for the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on Management of Habitat for Late-Successional and Old-Growth Forest Related Species Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (hereafter referred to as the Northwest Forest Plan). That document has been amended by the 2001 Record of Decision and Standards and Guidelines for the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Amendments to the Survey and Manage, Protection Buffer, and other Mitigation Measures Standards and Guidelines (hearafter referred to as the Survey and Manage Plan). The results of the 2001 Survey and Manage Annual Species Review is hearby incorporated by reference. Refer to pages 18-19 of the Survey and Manage Plan Standards and Guidelines. The Orchard project is primarily in the C1 Timber Emphasis land allocation. Activities are also proposed in a late-successional reserve (LSR) and in riparian reserves. B. Desired Future Condition The following desired future conditions are derived from the Mt. Hood Forest Plan as amended. Health Forests have low levels of disease, damaging insect populations and storm damage. Four- 92, FW-382; and Four-292, C1-22. Growth Stands are healthy and vigorous, and have growth rates commensurate with the sites potential (at a rate at which the mean annual increment has not culminated). Four-5, #44; and Four-86, FW-306; and Four-91, FW-372; and Four-90, FW-361. Scenery The forest is visually appealing with a wide variety of natural appearing landscape features. Forest stands and openings are blended with natural landforms and existing vegetation, and have natural shapes, edges, patterns, and sizes. This applies throughout the landscape with increased emphasis for areas seen from sensitive viewing positions. Four-218, goal; Four-113, FW-558; and Four-108. Deer & Elk The forest provides high quality summer rearing habitat for deer and elk. The forest contains a mix of habitats including forage, thermal cover and optimal cover. Open road Orchard Page 3 density is at a level that allows animals a sense of security. Four-72, FW-202 to 210. Snags & Snags, down logs, and recruitment trees are well distributed across the landscape in Down sufficient quantity and quality to support species dependent upon these habitats. Early- Logs seral stands are diverse and contain patches of green trees and snags as well as dispersed green trees and coarse woody debris. NFP pages C-40-41. Timber The forest consists of stands with an even distribution of age classes, up to approximately Emphasis 120 years, running from seedlings to mature timber. Four-290. C1 Riparian Riparian areas contain plant communities that are diverse in species composition and structure. They provide summer and winter thermal regulation and nutrient filtering, and have appropriate rates of surface erosion, bank erosion, and channel migration. They also supply coarse woody debris sufficient to sustain physical complexity and stability. Riparian reserves provide mature forest connectivity. NFP page B-11. Timber One of the dual goals of the Northwest Forest Plan is to provide a sustainable level of Harvest timber products to stabilize local economies and provide jobs. Timber outputs come Levels primarily from the Timber Emphasis (C-1) portion of the Matrix lands, with lesser amounts coming from the "B" land allocations of the Matrix. Minor amounts of timber may also come from Riparian Reserves or Late-Successional Reserves where harvesting would be used as a tool to enhance resources and move the landscape toward the desired future conditions. NFP pages 2 & 3, Mt. Hood Forest Plan Four-86 & Four-289. Aquatic Streams provide a diversity of aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms. They offer sufficient quantities of large woody debris; they have clean and abundant spawning gravel; they have stable banks that are well vegetated and have cool water. NFP page B- 11. Late- Late-Successional Reserves contain sufficient quantities of old-growth and mature-forest Succession ecosystems to meet the long-term needs of species such as the northern spotted owl. NFP al Reserve page C-9. The following statements describe desired future conditions from the South Fork Clackamas River Watershed Analysis. Landscape Forests contain a mix of habitats including early, middle and late-seral stands
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Overview
    HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT The following is a brief history of Oregon City. The intent is to provide a general overview, rather than a comprehensive history. Setting Oregon City, the county seat of Clackamas County, is located southeast of Portland on the east side of the Willamette River, just below the falls. Its unique topography includes three terraces, which rise above the river, creating an elevation range from about 50 feet above sea level at the riverbank to more than 250 feet above sea level on the upper terrace. The lowest terrace, on which the earliest development occurred, is only two blocks or three streets wide, but stretches northward from the falls for several blocks. Originally, industry was located primarily at the south end of Main Street nearest the falls, which provided power. Commercial, governmental and social/fraternal entities developed along Main Street north of the industrial area. Religious and educational structures also appeared along Main Street, but tended to be grouped north of the commercial core. Residential structures filled in along Main Street, as well as along the side and cross streets. As the city grew, the commercial, governmental and social/fraternal structures expanded northward first, and with time eastward and westward to the side and cross streets. Before the turn of the century, residential neighborhoods and schools were developing on the bluff. Some commercial development also occurred on this middle terrace, but the business center of the city continued to be situated on the lower terrace. Between the 1930s and 1950s, many of the downtown churches relocated to the bluff as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Oswego Lake Watershed Council
    Partner Newsletter Spring 2016 WATERSHED WORKS In this issue: Clackamas River Basin Council Clackamas Soil & Water Conservation District Johnson Creek Watershed Council Molalla River Watch North Clackamas Urban Watersheds Council Oswego Lake Watershed Council Sandy River Basin Watershed Council Tryon Creek Watershed Council Tualatin River Watershed Council Tualatin Soil & Water Conservation District West Multnomah Soil & Water Conservation District Spring, Summer, & Fall 2016 Events Calendar CLACKAMAS RIVER BASIN COUNCIL Clackamas Partnership Teams Up for Salmon Recovery The Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) awarded $137,696 to the Clackamas River Basin Council on behalf of the Clackamas Partnership. The Clackamas River watershed is an incredible resource to our state, providing drinking water to over 10% of the population and a recreation haven for thousands who fish, swim, and raft as well. The river is home to genetic legacy fish species whose historical abundance and its potential for salmon recovery is Coho salmon returning to spawn. recognized nationally for Spring Chinook, coho, and steelhead. With local landowners and community partners, the Clackamas River Basin Council has nearly two decades of proven results transforming the watershed. “The OWEB award will help us achieve greater restoration success as we work together,” says Cheryl McGinnis, Executive Director of the Clackamas River Basin Council. The Clackamas Partnership will develop an enhanced strategic action plan for recovery of listed Clackamas fish populations by addressing degraded water quality, aquatic and riparian habitat, migratory corridor connectivity and fish passage, and invasive species in priority areas. Planning is expected to begin this spring and be completed by July 2017. The Clackamas Partnership includes Clackamas Soil & Water Conservation District, Clackamas Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: the City's Natural Environment
    APPENDIX E The City’s Natural Environment APPENDIX E The City’s Natural Environment The City’s Environmental Setting General Characteristics Portland is situated at 20 feet above sea level, near the confluence of the Columbia and Willamette rivers, about 65 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. It lies midway between the lower Coast Range to the west and the high Cascades Range to the east, each about 30 miles distant. Portland’s varied topography includes steep hills, isolated volcanic cones, low rolling hills and extensive flat areas. The area is composed primarily of alluvial deposits and Columbia River basalts. Much of the city is located in the Willamette Valley Plains ecoregion, although steeper portions of the Tualatin Hills on the west side are characteristic of Willamette Valley Hills and Coastal Mountains ecoregions (Clarke and others 1991). Portland has a mild marine climate that is heavily influenced by the mountain ranges east and west of the city. The Coast Range protects the Portland area from Pacific storms, while the Cascades prevent colder continental air masses from invading western Oregon. In winter, the average temperature is 40°F and the average minimum temperature is 34°F. In summer the average temperature is 65°F with an average daily maximum of 74 to 78°F (Rockey 2002). The Cascades also lift moisture-laden westerly winds from the Pacific, driving local rainfall patterns. Average annual rainfall in the Portland area is approximately 37 inches. Nearly 90 percent of the annual rainfall occurs from October through May. Only 9 percent of the annual rainfall occurs between June and September, with 3 percent in July and August.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Basin Total Maximum Daily Loads (Tmdls)
    Willamette Basin TMDL: Clackamas Subbasin September 2006 CHAPTER 6: CLACKAMAS SUBBASIN TMDL Table of Contents WATER QUALITY SUMMARY......................................................................................... 3 Reason for action ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Who helped us................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Subbasin 303(d) Listed Parameters Addressed by a TMDL ..................................................................................... 4 SUBBASIN OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 5 Land Use and Ownership.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Watershed Descriptions ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Upper Clackamas Watershed....................................................................................................................................... 7 Collawash River and Hot Springs Fork Drainages ...................................................................................................... 8 Oak Grove Fork..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Dissertation Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Peter J. Wampler for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology presented on July 14, 2004. Title: Contrasting Geomorphic Responses to Climatic, Anthropogenic, and Fluvial Change Across Modern to Millennial Time Scales, Clackamas River, Oregon. Abstract approved: Gordon E. Grant Geomorphic change along the lower Clackamas River is occurring at a millennial scale due to climate change; a decadal scale as a result River Mill Dam operation; and at an annual scale since 1996 due to a meander cutoff. Channel response to these three mechanisms is incision. Holocene strath terraces, inset into Pleistocene terraces, are broadly synchronous with other terraces in the Pacific Northwest, suggesting a regional aggradational event at the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary. A maximum incision rate of 4.3 mm/year occurs where the river emerges from the Western Cascade Mountains and decreases to 1.4 mm/year near the river mouth. Tectonic uplift, bedrock erodibility, rapid base-level change downstream, or a systematic decrease in Holocene sediment flux may be contributing to the extremely rapid incision rates observed. The River Island mining site experienced a meander cutoff during flooding in 1996, resulting in channel length reduction of 1,100 meters as the river began flowing through a series of gravel pits. Within two days of the peak flow, 3.5 hectares of land and 105,500 m3 of gravel were eroded from the river bank just above the cutoff location. Reach slope increased from 0.0022 to approximately 0.0035 in the cutoff reach. The knick point from the meander cutoff migrated 2,290 meters upstream between 1996 and 2003, resulting in increased bed load transport, incision of 1 to 2 meters, and rapid water table lowering.
    [Show full text]
  • State Waterway Navigability Determination
    BODY OF WATER & LOCATION NAV CG NON-NAV CG REMARKS yellow highlight = apply to USCG for permit up to RM stipulated Alsea Bay, OR X Estuary of Pacific Ocean. Alsea River, OR X Flows into Alsea Bay, Waldport, OR. Navigable to mile 13. Ash Creek, OR X Tributary of Willamette River at Independence, OR. Barrett Slough, OR X Tributary of Lewis and Clark River. Bayou St. John, OR X Court decision, 1935 AMC 594, 10 Mile Lake, Coos County, OR. Bear Creek (Coos County), OR X Tributary of Coquille River (tidal at mile 0.5) Beaver Creek, OR X Tributary of Nestucca River. Beaver Slough, OR X See Clatskanie River. Big Creek (Lane County), OR X At U.S. 101 bridge (tidal). Big Creek (Lincoln County), OR X Flows into Pacific Ocean. Big Creek Slough, OR X Upstream end at Knappa, OR (tidal). At site of Birch Creek (Sparks) Bridge on Canyon Road near Birch Creek, OR X Pendleton, OR. Side channel of Yaquina River. 3 mi. downstream from Toledo, Blind Slough, OR X OR (tidal). Tributary of Knappa Slough. 10 mi. upstream from Astoria, OR Blind Slough/ Gnat Creek, OR X (tidal at mile 2.0). Boone Slough, OR X Tributary of Yaquina River between Newport and Toledo, OR. Side channel of Willamette River. 3 miles upstream from Booneville Channel, OR X Corvallis, OR. Boulder Creek, OR X 7 miles N of Lake Quinalt. Side channel of Columbia River. 5 miles N of Clatskanie, OR Bradbury Slough, OR X (tidal). Brownlee Reservoir, ID /OR X See Snake River. Also known as South Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • A Storypath Exploring the Lasting Legacy of Celilo Falls by Shana Brown
    Living in Celilo A Storypath Exploring the Lasting Legacy of Celilo Falls by Shana Brown Office of Native Education Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Washington State Trillium Publishing, Inc. Acknowledgements Contents Shana Brown would like to thank: Carol Craig, Yakama Elder, writer, and historian, for her photos of Celilo as well as her Introduction to Storypath ..................... 2 expertise and her children’s story “I Wish I Had Seen the Falls.” Chucky is really her first grandson (and my cousin!). Episode 1: Creating the Setting ...............22 The Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission for providing information about their organization and granting permission to use articles, including a piece from their Episode 2: Creating the Characters............42 magazine Wana Chinook Tymoo. Episode 3: Building Context ..................54 HistoryLink.org for granting permission to use the article “Dorothea Nordstrand Recalls Old Celilo Falls.” Episode 4: Authorizing the Dam ..............68 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council for granting permission to use an excerpt from the article “Celilo Falls.” Episode 5: Negotiations .....................86 Ritchie Graves, Chief of the NW Region Hydropower Division’s FCRPS Branch, NOAA Fisheries, for providing information on survival rates of salmon through the Episode 6: Broken Promises ................118 dams on the Columbia River system. Episode 7: Inundation .....................142 Sally Thompson, PhD., for granting permission to use her articles. Se-Ah-Dom Edmo, Shoshone-Bannock/Nez Perce/ Yakama, Coordinator of the Classroom-Based Assessment ...............154 Indigenous Ways of Knowing Program at Lewis & Clark College, Columbia River Board Member, and Vice President of the Oregon Indian Education Association, for providing invaluable feedback and guidance as well as copies of the actual notes and letters from the Celilo Falls Community Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Columbia Chum
    Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Lower Columbia Chum Existing Populations This SMU consists of seven historic populations which are extinct (Table 85). This conclusion is supported by spawning surveys from the past several years. Ollerenshaw (2001) reported on chum spawner surveys from throughout the lower Columbia from the Youngs to the Columbia River Gorge tributaries. In 2001, after 79 surveys in 27 streams, no live or dead chum, and no chum redds were observed. In 2000, only one chum was observed in the South Fork Klaskanine River, and in 1999, more limited sampling yielded two live chum and one dead chum. A limited number of chum are captured at the Big Creek hatchery trap each year. Between 1990 and 2004, zero to 27 fish have been trapped annually. It has been proposed that recent chum returns to Oregon tributaries are simply stray chum returning as part of healthier runs to Washington tributaries to the lower Columbia. Loss or severe degradation of estuarine and lower river habitat has been implicated as a major cause for the extinction of chum runs in the lower Columbia River tributaries of Oregon. Table 85. Population list and existence status for the Lower Columbia Chum SMU. Exist Population Description No Youngs Youngs Bay tributaries. No Big Big Creek basin plus other Columbia River tributaries from Mill to (and including) Hunt Creek. No Clatskanie Clatskanie River basin plus Columbia River tributaries downstream to include Plympton Creek and upstream to include Beaver Creek. No Scappoose Scappoose Creek basin plus Columbia River tributaries downstream to Goble Creek and upstream to mouth of Willamette River.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology Spring 2016 Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia Henry B. Zenk Portland State University Yvonne P. Hajda Robert T. Boyd Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Zenk H., Hajda, Y., and Boyd, R. (2016). Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia. Oregon Historical Quarterly, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 6-37. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Chinookan Villages of the Lower Columbia HENRY ZENK, YVONNE HAJDA, AND ROBERT BOYD VILLAGES WERE THE CENTER of Chinookan life, filling the role that tribes did for Native people in other parts of North America. Every village of any size or significance had a recognized leader or chief, and constituted a named local group with which its members identified themselves. Although the villages themselves are long vanished, early travelers, missionaries, and settlers have left us eyewitness accounts of what some were like. The names and approximate locations of many more can be reconstructed from historical sources and information shared by later generations of lower Columbia
    [Show full text]
  • Clackamas Hatchery
    CLACKAMAS HATCHERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 Clackamas Hatchery (Clear Creek Acclimation, Foster Creek Acclimation, Eagle Creek Hatchery) INTRODUCTION Clackamas Hatchery is located on the Clackamas River in McIver State Park, 6 miles west of the city of Estacada, Oregon. The site is located at an elevation of 313 feet above sea level, at latitude 45.2961 and longitude -122.3603. The area of the site is 17 acres. Water rights total 44,354 gpm from the Clackamas River and a well. The Clackamas River provides the majority of water used for hatchery operations. All ponds and raceways receive single-pass water. The hatchery is operated with 4.0 FTE’s. Rearing Facilities at Clackamas Hatchery Unit Unit Unit Unit Unit Number Total Construction Type Length Width Depth Volume Units Volume Material Age Condition Comment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft3) (ft3) Adult Holding Ponds 60 10 4.25 2250 3 10,080 concrete 1980 good Remodeled in 2001 Raceways 75 17 3.2 4,080 4 16,320 concrete 1980 good Raceways 75 17 3.2 4,080 6 24,480 concrete 1987 good Rearing Ponds 300 50 4.5 67,500 2 135,000 asphalt/ 1980 good concrete Rearing Ponds 300 50 4.5 67,500 1 67,500 asphalt/ 1987 good concrete Vertical Incubators 272 fiberglass 1980 good 17 stacks of 16 trays PURPOSE Clackamas Hatchery began operation in 1979 and is operated from three funding sources: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Portland General Electric (PGE) and the City of Portland. The NMFS funding is part of the Columbia River Fisheries Development Program (Mitchell Act)—a program to enhance declining fish runs in the Columbia River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Occurrence and Distribution in the Lower Clackamas River Basin, Oregon, 2000–2005
    Prepared in cooperation with the Clackamas Watershed Management Group (Clackamas River Water Providers and Clackamas County Water Environment Services) and the National Water-Quality Assessment Program Pesticide Occurrence and Distribution in the Lower Clackamas River Basin, Oregon, 2000–2005 Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5027 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Top left: Pesticides are sometimes used on urban landscaping (Rock Creek basin) (Photograph taken January 2, 2003.) Top right: Arborvitae ornamental trees are grown at many of the Clackamas River basin nurseries (North Fork Deep Creek basin) (Photograph taken March 13, 2004.) Bottom Noyer Creek, a tributary of lower Deep Creek, is highly turbid after stormwater runoff, September 2005. (Photograph taken September 30, 2005. All cover photographs taken by Kurt D. Carpenter, U.S. Geological Survey.) Pesticide Occurrence and Distribution in the Lower Clackamas River Basin, Oregon, 2000–2005 By Kurt D. Carpenter, Steven Sobieszczyk, Andrew J. Arnsberg, and Frank A. Rinella Prepared in cooperation with the Clackamas Watershed Management Group (Clackamas River Water Providers and Clackamas County Water Environment Services) and the National Water-Quality Assessment Program Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5027 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]