WHO Drug Information Vol 19, No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

WHO Drug Information Vol 19, No. 3, 2005 World Health Organization WHO Drug Information Contents Personal Perspectives Regulatory Action and News Unfinished business: clinical pharmacology Hydromorphone extended release and world health 201 suspended 217 New drug safety initiative 217 Safety and Efficacy Issues Deregistration of thioridazine 217 Transdermal fentanyl: abuse by adolescents 207 Caution on self medication 218 Safety of fentanyl transdermal patches 207 European marketing authorizations 218 Rosiglitazone: decreased high-density Tigecycline: first-in-class antibiotic approved 219 lipoprotein cholesterol 208 Ibuprofen: Stevens-Johnson syndrome 208 Essential Medicines Stringent conditions for COX-2 inhibitors 209 Highlights of the 14th Model List of Sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil: eye Essential Medicines 220 problems reported 209 Methadone and buprenorphine 220 Nesiritide: safety report and measures 210 Mifepristone with misoprostol 220 Mifepristone, sepsis and blood infection 211 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines 222 Mifepristone: revised safety information 211 Suicidality with SSRIs in adults 211 Ezetimibe and muscle disorders 212 Access to Medicines Pathological gambling with cabergoline 212 Intellectual property protection: impact on Icodextrin peritoneal dialysis solution: falsely public health 236 elevated blood glucose readings 213 New requirements for pseudoephedrine products 213 The International Pharmacopoeia Efalizumab: warning of thrombocytopenia 214 International Pharmacopoeia: fourth edition Antiretrovirals: HIV, hepatic impairment in development 242 and HBV/HCV 214 Recommended International Herbal Medicines Nonproprietary Names: Monograph for cultivation of herbal antimalarial: Artemisia annua 215 List 54 243 Ayurvedic medicines and heavy metals 215 National policy on regulation of herbal medicines 216 Regulatory guidelines for complementary medicines 216 199 World Health Organization WHO Drug Information Vol 19, No. 3, 2005 WHO Drug Information e-mail table of contents and subscriptions available at: http://www.who.int/druginformation 200 WHO Drug Information Vol 19, No. 3, 2005 Personal Perspectives Unfinished business: public system in developed countries but for many developing countries often exceed 30% of health clinical pharmacology budget.) However, the demand for a new lecturer and world health in molecular biology in a medical school, a new cardiologist in a teaching hospital or a further Clinical pharmacology has existed for just over 40 administrator in a health service commonly takes years and is a relative newcomer to the range of precedence over creating a position for a clinical specialties. It took its origins from the clinical pharmacologist. development of methods for the formal testing of new medicines in man – especially the rand- If clinical pharmacology has had some difficulties omized, controlled, clinical trial – and from the in making its presence felt in the developed world, major concerns about safety of medicines these have been much greater in developing catalysed particularly by the thalidomide disaster world countries where medical needs are often of the early 1960s [9]. Essentially, it is the scien- comparatively much greater but available, trained tific study of medicines in man and has developed personnel are few. its own methodological approaches ranging from single dose studies of medicines in individuals Against this background, recently revised “Aims and small groups to wider studies of medicines and Functions of the International Union of Basic use in whole populations. Among several enabling and Clinical Pharmacology (2) include . branches of the discipline are pharmacovigilance “helping in all ways the development of pharma- (the monitoring and study of the safety of medi- cology throughout the world particularly in cines), pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, emerging countries”. The aims include “(to) pharmacoepidemiology and more recently, improve and harmonize the teaching of rational pharmacoeconomics. Many collaborative partner- use of drugs . particularly in developing ships have been forged with pharmacists, analyti- countries” and “(to) improve the utilization cal chemists, statisticians, other clinicians and, of clinical pharmacological services in health care more recently, epidemiologists and health econo- delivery, particularly in developing countries. .” mists, in developing these themes. Developing-developed world As a new discipline clinical pharmacology has had collaboration in clinical to fight for recognition, both in medical schools but also in the wider world of health care delivery. pharmacology This is perhaps surprising when one of the main Distance and the lack of easy communication tasks of any physician is the safe and effective militated against collaborative work between prescription of medicines, and of any health developed and developing countries for many service to ensure the availability of medicines of years. An exception was the work of D.R. high quality, safety and efficacy to be used in the Laurence, a pioneer clinical pharmacologist from most cost-effective manner. (Costs of medicines the United Kingdom who worked over several may be 10% of total healthcare spending in the years with colleagues from Bombay (now Mumbai), India to determine the safe and effec- tive dose of tetanus antitoxin for the treatment of Article adapted from the IUPHAR Clinical Pharmacology this (now largely preventable) disease. Their lecture of the same title given at the 8th World Congress conclusions in 1968 were that “in the treatment of of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Brisbane, tetanus 10 000 IU (international units) of equine Australia, August 2004. It appeared in: International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 17: 65–71 (2005) antitoxin is about as effective as 200 000 IU” [14]. authored by Anthony J. Smith, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Newcastle and WHO Remarkably, this was the first systematic attempt Collaborating Centre for Training in Pharmaco-econom- to define a rational dose of antitoxin but it also ics and Rational Pharmacotherapy, Australia. established that inter-country collaborations on 201 Personal Perspectives WHO Drug Information Vol 19, No. 3, 2005 matters of importance to public health were and clinical pharmacologists in several developing possible and could yield answers which reduced countries. The results are applicable to both the cost of provision of services in the public developed and developing communities [1]. sector, in this case by a factor of 20. Clinical toxicology has often been a neglected In the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s a area of research. Here again recent inter-country trickle of young trainees from developing coun- collaborations have advanced knowledge – for tries was funded to work in clinical pharmacology example, the Oxford–Colombo research unit units in Europe and the USA. In retrospect, the working on the management of poisoning both unawareness of many of the host departments of with organophosphate insecticides (estimated to the needs of the developing country, and the kill 200 000 people worldwide each year ) and immaturity of the discipline itself often meant that with Oleander species – plants often taken with their training was not tailored to real needs. For suicidal intent in Sri Lanka and containing instance, acquiring skills in the measurement of glycosides with a digoxin-like cardiotoxic effect small amounts of medicines in blood samples was which, untreated, may be rapidly fatal [7]. not relevant for a trainee going back to a country which had difficulty in providing even essential Recently several centres of clinical pharmacology medicines to the poorest of its people let alone have developed collaborative programs concen- setting up a sophisticated analytical facility in trating on training in rational medicines use. which the trainee could practice his new-found Examples include the current Egypt–Denmark– techniques. This lack of congruence between Sweden collaboration on rational prescribing and training and career prospects often led to disillu- Spanish initiatives linking clinical pharmacology sion and migration of the trainee either back to training into the health care systems of Central the laboratories of the developed world or into a and South American countries. different clinical specialty at home. Applying research lessons to the The advent of the Internet coupled with easier use of medicines in the health care travel has transformed the possibilities for collaboration between developed and developing system countries and there are many examples of partnerships producing important research Are the newly-won lessons coming from the findings of direct benefit to both partners. Malaria developed-developing research partnerships remains one of the most perplexing tropical having an impact on health services? The diseases and the long-standing collaboration evidence obtained is “necessary but not sufficient” between Oxford University and the research to ensure its translation into health policy and group in Mahidol University in Thailand is a good delivery of health care but there are pointers to example of a better approach to research into ways in which this might be done. issues of safe and effective treatment [16]. A simple but relevant study of the efficacy and Experience gained in Australia over the past 13 safety of rectal artesunate compared with quinine years shows that the role of the clinical pharma- in the
Recommended publications
  • WHO Model List of Essential Medicines

    WHO Model List of Essential Medicines

    WHO Model List of Essential Medicines 15th list, March 2007 Status of this document This is a reprint of the text on the WHO Medicines web site http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/index.html 15th edition Essential Medicines WHO Model List (revised March 2007) Explanatory Notes The core list presents a list of minimum medicine needs for a basic health care system, listing the most efficacious, safe and cost‐effective medicines for priority conditions. Priority conditions are selected on the basis of current and estimated future public health relevance, and potential for safe and cost‐effective treatment. The complementary list presents essential medicines for priority diseases, for which specialized diagnostic or monitoring facilities, and/or specialist medical care, and/or specialist training are needed. In case of doubt medicines may also be listed as complementary on the basis of consistent higher costs or less attractive cost‐effectiveness in a variety of settings. The square box symbol () is primarily intended to indicate similar clinical performance within a pharmacological class. The listed medicine should be the example of the class for which there is the best evidence for effectiveness and safety. In some cases, this may be the first medicine that is licensed for marketing; in other instances, subsequently licensed compounds may be safer or more effective. Where there is no difference in terms of efficacy and safety data, the listed medicine should be the one that is generally available at the lowest price, based on international drug price information sources. Therapeutic equivalence is only indicated on the basis of reviews of efficacy and safety and when consistent with WHO clinical guidelines.
  • Adverse Health Effects of Heavy Metals in Children

    Adverse Health Effects of Heavy Metals in Children

    TRAINING FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS [Date …Place …Event …Sponsor …Organizer] ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF HEAVY METALS IN CHILDREN Children's Health and the Environment WHO Training Package for the Health Sector World Health Organization www.who.int/ceh October 2011 1 <<NOTE TO USER: Please add details of the date, time, place and sponsorship of the meeting for which you are using this presentation in the space indicated.>> <<NOTE TO USER: This is a large set of slides from which the presenter should select the most relevant ones to use in a specific presentation. These slides cover many facets of the problem. Present only those slides that apply most directly to the local situation in the region. Please replace the examples, data, pictures and case studies with ones that are relevant to your situation.>> <<NOTE TO USER: This slide set discusses routes of exposure, adverse health effects and case studies from environmental exposure to heavy metals, other than lead and mercury, please go to the modules on lead and mercury for more information on those. Please refer to other modules (e.g. water, neurodevelopment, biomonitoring, environmental and developmental origins of disease) for complementary information>> Children and heavy metals LEARNING OBJECTIVES To define the spectrum of heavy metals (others than lead and mercury) with adverse effects on human health To describe the epidemiology of adverse effects of heavy metals (Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper and Thallium) in children To describe sources and routes of exposure of children to those heavy metals To understand the mechanism and illustrate the clinical effects of heavy metals’ toxicity To discuss the strategy of prevention of heavy metals’ adverse effects 2 The scope of this module is to provide an overview of the public health impact, adverse health effects, epidemiology, mechanism of action and prevention of heavy metals (other than lead and mercury) toxicity in children.
  • ABC of Poisoning. Emergency Drugs: Agents Used in the Treatment Of

    ABC of Poisoning. Emergency Drugs: Agents Used in the Treatment Of

    1984 1AFnT('AT VOT. TmFT 289 22 SEPTEMBER UIQnTCTIT utILtjTOTTRMAT vJV' _- - . _ 742 D.ll.lilm13 4=.-, TIM MEREDITH JANE CAISLEY ABC ofPoisoning GLYN VOLANS EMERGENCY DRUGS: AGENTS USED IN THE TREATMENT OF POISONING A readily available and practical guide to the drugs used in the treatment of / poisoning is important, since many of the agents concerned are used infrequently; some can be obtained only from selected poisons treatment centres, and others, although listed in textbooks, are not available in the United Kingdom; still others are now considered obsolete and, in some cases, actually dangerous. The article Is basen advice Lists ofrecommended drugs have been published by the Department of appendixah artiendixsHto basedcrcularcircuon HNhen(78) Health and Social Security, most recently as HN(62)13 and HN(78)23. DrHuSS s 23 Ougs of Special Value in the1This article is based on these earlier lists, although, necessarily, many more Treatment of Poisoning in drugs have been included and additional information is given on the Accident and Emergency indications for use, mode ofaction, presentation, and dosage. In future this Departments list will be revised as necessary, and copies will be available from the National Poisons Information Service. Agents used for local cleansing, reliefofpain, fluid replacement, oxygen, and the more general care of the injured patient are not included. The need for collaboration and discussion between doctors and pharmacists in the preparation ofthis list is readily apparent and we would welcome comments which may be taken into account in future revisions. (1) Recommended agents that are readily available The decision to stock individual items will depend on the expected ofthe hospital concerned.
  • Toxic Exposures Kathy L

    Toxic Exposures Kathy L

    8 MODULE 8 Toxic Exposures Kathy L. Leham-Huskamp / William J. Keenan / Anthony J. Scalzo / Shan Yin 8 Toxic Exposures Kathy L. Lehman-Huskamp, MD William J. Keenan, MD Anthony J. Scalzo, MD Shan Yin, MD InTrODUcTIOn The first large-scale production of chemical and biological weapons occurred during the 20th century. World War I introduced the use of toxic gases such as chlorine, cyanide, an arsine as a means of chemical warfare. With recent events, such as the airplane attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City, people have become increasingly fearful of potential large-scale terrorist attacks. Consequently, there has been a heightened interest in disaster preparedness especially involving chemical and biological agents. The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recommends an "all-hazards" approach to emergency planning. This means creating a simultaneous plan for intentional terrorist events as well as for the more likely unintentional public health emergencies, such as earthquakes, floods, hazardous chemical spills, and infectious outbreaks. Most large-scale hazardous exposures are determined by the type of major industries that exist and/or the susceptibility to different types of natural disasters in a given area. For example, in 1984 one of the greatest man-made disasters of all times occurred in Bhopal, India, when a Union Carbide pesticide plant released tons of methylisocyanate gas over a populated area, killing scores of thousands and injuring well over 250,000 individuals. The 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan demonstrated the vulnerability of nuclear power stations to natural disasters and the need to prepare for possible widespread nuclear contamination and radiation exposure.
  • World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines, 21St List, 2019

    World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines, 21St List, 2019

    World Health Organizatio n Model List of Essential Medicines 21st List 2019 World Health Organizatio n Model List of Essential Medicines 21st List 2019 WHO/MVP/EMP/IAU/2019.06 © World Health Organization 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines, 21st List, 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris.
  • &lt; MOH Approved Drugs List &gt;

    < MOH Approved Drugs List >

    Ministry Of Health Directorate General of Medical Supplies Rep_Id : App_Drugs_List_Who.rdf < MOH Approved Drugs List > DATE : 12/08/2009 Page : 1 of 108 VED Flag <S.No> < Item Code > < I T E M D E S C ROF I P- T I O N > < U N I T > DATE : ABC Flag H/C Flag Category : DRUGS 1 Ph. System : GASTRO-INTESTINAL SYSTEM 1 Main Group : ANTACIDS 1 Sub Group : ALUMINIUM COMPOUNDS 1 03000000105 ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE GEL, DRIED 475 MG. CAPSULE Desirable Cat_C Not H/C Item 2 Sub Group : ANTACID COMPOUND PREPARATIONS 2 02000000079 ANTACID SUSPENSION (ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE + BOTTLE Desirable MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE OR TRISILICATE) 100 - 200 Cat_A ML. B0TTLE. H/C Item 3 03000000173 ANTACID TABLET (ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE + TABLET/CAP Desirable MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE OR TRISILICATE). Cat_A H/C Item 2 Main Group : ANTISPASMODICS 1 Sub Group : ANTIMUSCARINICS 4 01000000304 HYOSCINE N BUTYLBROMIDE 20MG/ML. 1ML. AMPOULE Essantial Cat_A H/C Item 5 03000000640 HYOSCINE N BUTYL BROMIDE 10MG. TABLET/CAP Essantial Cat_A H/C Item 6 020D0000063 ANTISPASMODIC DROPS 15ML-25ML. BOTTLE Desirable Cat_C Not H/C Item 2 Sub Group : OTHER ANTISPASMODIC AND MOTILITY STIMULANT 7 03000001245 MEBEVERINE HYDROCHLORIDE 100 MG - 135 MG. TABLET/CAP Essantial Cat_B Not H/C Item Ministry Of Health Directorate General of Medical Supplies Rep_Id : App_Drugs_List_Who.rdf < MOH Approved Drugs List > DATE : 12/08/2009 Page : 2 of 108 VED Flag <S.No> < Item Code > < I T E M D E S C ROF I P- T I O N > < U N I T > DATE : ABC Flag H/C Flag Category : DRUGS 1 Ph.
  • Aqueous Α-Lipoic Acid Solutions for Removal of Arsenic and Mercury from Materials Used for Museum Artifacts

    Aqueous Α-Lipoic Acid Solutions for Removal of Arsenic and Mercury from Materials Used for Museum Artifacts

    Aqueous alpha-lipoic acid solutions for removal of arsenic and mercury from materials used for museum artifacts Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Cross, Peggi Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 22:18:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195574 AQUEOUS -LIPOIC ACID SOLUTIONS FOR REMOVAL OF ARSENIC AND MERCURY FROM MATERIALS USED FOR MUSEUM ARTIFACTS by Peggi S. Cross _________________________________ Copyright © Peggi S. Cross 2007 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2007 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Peggi S. Cross entitled Aqueous -Lipoic Acid Solutions for Removal of Arsenic and Mercury from Materials used for Museum Artifacts and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. __________________________________________________Date: 4-12-2007 Mark Riley __________________________________________________Date: 4-12-2007 David Lynch __________________________________________________Date: 4-12-2007 Nancy Odegaard __________________________________________________Date: 4-12-2007 Wendell Ela Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
  • EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General Notices

    EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General Notices

    EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General notices......................................................................... 3 2.2.66. Detection and measurement of radioactivity........... 119 2.1. Apparatus ............................................................................. 15 2.2.7. Optical rotation................................................................ 26 2.1.1. Droppers ........................................................................... 15 2.2.8. Viscosity ............................................................................ 27 2.1.2. Comparative table of porosity of sintered-glass filters.. 15 2.2.9. Capillary viscometer method ......................................... 27 2.1.3. Ultraviolet ray lamps for analytical purposes............... 15 2.3. Identification...................................................................... 129 2.1.4. Sieves ................................................................................. 16 2.3.1. Identification reactions of ions and functional 2.1.5. Tubes for comparative tests ............................................ 17 groups ...................................................................................... 129 2.1.6. Gas detector tubes............................................................ 17 2.3.2. Identification of fatty oils by thin-layer 2.2. Physical and physico-chemical methods.......................... 21 chromatography...................................................................... 132 2.2.1. Clarity and degree of opalescence of
  • SHANDS June 2002 at the University of Florida Drugs & Therapy B ◆ U ◆ L ◆ L ◆ E ◆ T ◆ I ◆ N

    SHANDS June 2002 at the University of Florida Drugs & Therapy B ◆ U ◆ L ◆ L ◆ E ◆ T ◆ I ◆ N

    Volume 16, Number 6 SHANDS June 2002 at the University of Florida Drugs & Therapy B ◆ U ◆ L ◆ L ◆ E ◆ T ◆ I ◆ N PAIN MANAGEMENT FORMULARY UPDATE The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Ode to the Sphincter: The Committee met May 21, 2002. 2 drugs were added in the Formu- comparative effects of lary and 2 drugs were deleted. 1 drug was evaluated, but not added: it was designated nonformulary morphine and meperidine and not available. In total, 5 drugs 1 were designated not available. cute pancreatitis is a clinical out the facts. A syndrome characterized by severe In 1 study identified in this review, acute abdominal pain, vomiting, and Coelho and colleagues evaluated the elevations in serum amylase and effects of morphine, meperidine, and ◆ ADDED lipase concentrations. It is most other narcotic analgesics on the biliary Arsenic trioxide commonly associated with alcohol pressure of opossums (the chosen (Trisenox® by Cell Therapeutics) ingestion and gallstones. Medical animal model for biliary studies).2 teaching has been that morphine Although biliary pressure was higher Dimercaprol in animals that had undergone chole- (BAL in Oil by Akorn) ◆ cystectomy, the difference between ◆ DELETED Studies of narcotic effects morphine and meperidine was not Ergonovine injection on the sphincter of Oddi significant. Furthermore, in animals (generic by Bedford Labs) with a gallbladder, the increase in and bile duct pressures biliary pressure was not significant, Tolazoline (Priscoline® by Ciba) indicate that there is no regardless of whether morphine or meperidine was administered. ◆ EVALUATED, BUT NOT ADDED difference between In a human trial by Economou and Dexmedetomidine* morphine and meperidine Ward-Mcquaid, 31 patients were given (Precedex® by Abbott) morphine, meperidine, or another nar- for acute pain relief in cotic agonist after cholecystectomy.3 *Nonformulary and not available patients with pancreatitis.
  • The Selection and Use of Essential Medicines

    The Selection and Use of Essential Medicines

    WHO Technical Report Series 958 THE SELECTION AND USE OF ESSENTIAL MEDICINES This report presents the recommendations of the WHO Expert THE SELECTION AND USE Committee responsible for updating the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. The fi rst part contains a review of the OF ESSENTIAL MEDICINES report of the meeting of the Expert Subcommittee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines, held in October 2008. It also provides details of new applications for paediatric medicines and summarizes the Committee’s considerations and justifi cations for additions and changes to the Model List, including its recommendations. Part Two of the publication is the report of the second meeting of the Subcommittee of the Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines. Annexes include the revised version of the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (the 16th) and the revised version of the WHO Model List of Report of the WHO Expert Committee, 2009 Essential Medicines for Children (the 2nd). In addition there is a list of all the items on the Model List sorted according to their (including the 16th WHO Model List of Essential Medicines Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classifi cation codes. and the 2nd WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children) WHO Technical Report Series — 958 WHO Technical ISBN 978-92-4-120958-8 Geneva TTRS958cover.inddRS958cover.indd 1 110.06.100.06.10 008:328:32 The World Health Organization was established in 1948 as a specialized agency of the United Nations serving as the directing and coordinating authority for SELECTED WHO PUBLICATIONS OF RELATED INTEREST international health matters and public health.
  • FDA Listing of Established Pharmacologic Class Text Phrases January 2021

    FDA Listing of Established Pharmacologic Class Text Phrases January 2021

    FDA Listing of Established Pharmacologic Class Text Phrases January 2021 FDA EPC Text Phrase PLR regulations require that the following statement is included in the Highlights Indications and Usage heading if a drug is a member of an EPC [see 21 CFR 201.57(a)(6)]: “(Drug) is a (FDA EPC Text Phrase) indicated for Active Moiety Name [indication(s)].” For each listed active moiety, the associated FDA EPC text phrase is included in this document. For more information about how FDA determines the EPC Text Phrase, see the 2009 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" guidance and 2013 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" MAPP 7400.13.
  • (CD-P-PH/PHO) Report Classification/Justifica

    (CD-P-PH/PHO) Report Classification/Justifica

    COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINES AS REGARDS THEIR SUPPLY (CD-P-PH/PHO) Report classification/justification of - Medicines belonging to the ATC group M01 (Antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products) Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION 6 DISCLAIMER 8 GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT 9 ACTIVE SUBSTANCES Phenylbutazone (ATC: M01AA01) 11 Mofebutazone (ATC: M01AA02) 17 Oxyphenbutazone (ATC: M01AA03) 18 Clofezone (ATC: M01AA05) 19 Kebuzone (ATC: M01AA06) 20 Indometacin (ATC: M01AB01) 21 Sulindac (ATC: M01AB02) 25 Tolmetin (ATC: M01AB03) 30 Zomepirac (ATC: M01AB04) 33 Diclofenac (ATC: M01AB05) 34 Alclofenac (ATC: M01AB06) 39 Bumadizone (ATC: M01AB07) 40 Etodolac (ATC: M01AB08) 41 Lonazolac (ATC: M01AB09) 45 Fentiazac (ATC: M01AB10) 46 Acemetacin (ATC: M01AB11) 48 Difenpiramide (ATC: M01AB12) 53 Oxametacin (ATC: M01AB13) 54 Proglumetacin (ATC: M01AB14) 55 Ketorolac (ATC: M01AB15) 57 Aceclofenac (ATC: M01AB16) 63 Bufexamac (ATC: M01AB17) 67 2 Indometacin, Combinations (ATC: M01AB51) 68 Diclofenac, Combinations (ATC: M01AB55) 69 Piroxicam (ATC: M01AC01) 73 Tenoxicam (ATC: M01AC02) 77 Droxicam (ATC: M01AC04) 82 Lornoxicam (ATC: M01AC05) 83 Meloxicam (ATC: M01AC06) 87 Meloxicam, Combinations (ATC: M01AC56) 91 Ibuprofen (ATC: M01AE01) 92 Naproxen (ATC: M01AE02) 98 Ketoprofen (ATC: M01AE03) 104 Fenoprofen (ATC: M01AE04) 109 Fenbufen (ATC: M01AE05) 112 Benoxaprofen (ATC: M01AE06) 113 Suprofen (ATC: M01AE07) 114 Pirprofen (ATC: M01AE08) 115 Flurbiprofen (ATC: M01AE09) 116 Indoprofen (ATC: M01AE10) 120 Tiaprofenic Acid (ATC: