ARTICLE Valuing Speech and Open Source Intelligence in the Face Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ARTICLE Valuing Speech and Open Source Intelligence in the Face Of ARTICLE Valuing Speech and Open Source Intelligence in the Face of Judicial Deference __________________________ Andrew V. Moshirnia∗ Abstract In seeking to more effectively wage the war on terror, the United States government has come close to declaring war on speech related to terrorism. The Government has taken steps to silence and punish foreign propagandists, foreign reporters, and even Americans who have produced “coordinated” speech with foreign terrorist organizations. While this latter attempt to chill speech raises serious constitutional concerns, the United States Supreme Court has seen little wrong with this approach. Indeed, the Court contorted existing First Amendment jurisprudence in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project so as to uphold 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, an expansive material support statute encompassing “coordinated” speech. These positions, no doubt taken with American safety in mind, not only damage our First Amendment jurisprudence, but also threaten to choke off the supply of open source intelligence, which derives from publicly available sources. This intelligence is especially vital in the modern war on terror taking place on the ground as well as on the Internet. This Article highlights the extraordinary deference shown by the Court in upholding a material support statute criminalizing non-violent speech and examines other governmental actions designed to chill foreign speech. This piece examines the deleterious effects chilling foreign speech will have on domestic security, detailing the importance of open source intelligence. Finally, this Article concludes by investigating the likely effect the Government’s positions will ∗ JD, May 2011, Harvard Law School; PhD—Informational Technology, May 2008, University of Kansas; Law Clerk to the Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Thanks are due to Jack Battaglia, Aaron Dozeman, Sonia Fleury, Hank Greenberg, Jordan Mobley, and Stephanie Kuhlmann for their excellent assistance. I would like to thank Professors Phil Malone, Brian Sheppard, and especially the late Bill Stuntz for their guidance and support. Copyright © 2013 by the Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College & Andrew Moshirnia. 2013 / Valuing Speech and OSINT in the Face of Judicial Deference 386 have on Crisis Mapping, an exciting new technology that leverages open source intelligence, social media, and horizontal information sharing, to empower citizens and coordinate humanitarian efforts. I. Introduction Commentators often implore the Court to resist the false dichotomy of liberty and security. In times of crisis, governmental actors seem all too willing to sacrifice the former to guarantee the latter.1 Recently, the United States government has taken steps to chill the speech of foreign combatants, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), lawful permanent residents, and even the foreign and domestic press. The Government has adopted the position that First Amendment speech protections simply do not apply to trials of enemy aliens in American courts, a measure designed to silence foreign propagandists.2 Furthermore, the Government has previously detained an individual at Guantanamo Bay on the basis of his employment as a foreign reporter.3 Finally, the Government has claimed that association with terrorists may allow the criminalization of domestic speech that would otherwise enjoy First Amendment protection. While these actions are taken with security in mind, they undermine the ability of the United States to analyze and anticipate future threats. In the age of open source intelligence (OSINT), which is intelligence produced from publicly available information,4 our security often derives from the foreign production of 1 See Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) (upholding internment of Japanese- Americans); see also Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951); Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) (criminalizing all association, even non-violent association, with the communist party); Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925) (reintroducing the “the bad tendency test” found in Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919) to punish political speech that might endanger the government); Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) (upholding the 1917 Espionage Act). 2 While courts are often cognizant of chilling, there is no shortage of justifications for why a speech restrictive statute does not have the effect of chilling. See e.g., United States v. Al- Bahlul, 820 F. Supp. 2d 1141, 1250 (USCMCR 2011) (arguing that the decision does not chill speech). The court’s justification disregards the effect penalties would have on future speech. 3 DEP’T OF DEF., UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD IN THE CASE OF SAMI MUHEIDINE MOHAMED AL HAJ 33–35 (Sept. 4, 2006), http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_2_Factors_499- 598.pdf#33 [hereinafter HAJ REVIEW BOARD]. 4 National Defense Authorization Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-163 § 931(a)(1), 119 Stat. 3136, available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW- 109publ163/html/PLAW-109publ163.htm. 387 Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 4 terror-related intelligence. Cutting off the flow of terror-related foreign and domestic speech will undermine that intelligence, and in turn, American safety. It is up to the Court to serve as a restraint on such reactions. However, the United States Supreme Court, in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project,5 (HLP) recently embraced exactly this trade-off, restricting some speech linked to foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). There, the Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, a material support statute that restricts “material support” to foreign terrorist groups, could criminalize speech related to foreign terrorist groups, provided that the speech was made in “coordination” with those groups. To facilitate this trade-off, the Court diluted the exacting standard usually demanded for content-based speech restrictions and conducted a curtailed policy and ends-only analysis determining that reducing advocacy for terrorists is essential to the war on terror.6 Even if this conclusion were correct, the Court damaged our understanding of First Amendment doctrine through the application of a strange variation of strict scrutiny devoid of any means analysis.7 In this rare situation, the First Amendment doctrine of strict scrutiny was perfectly equipped to deliver the right result. In its analysis, the Court ignored the important relationship between foreign speech and domestic safety. By manipulating established standards to elevate security over liberty, the Court served neither principle. It is unclear how speech associated with foreign terrorist groups deserves less First Amendment protections when that speech does not advocate imminent lawless conduct. Consequently, the nebulous “coordination” test will likely chill otherwise constitutionally protected speech. HLP will signal to both Congress and lower courts that content- based speech restrictions may survive strict scrutiny, provided that the Government cites a compelling interest in fighting the war on terror. Indeed, lower courts have followed suit, sustaining material support convictions involving the production of speech that would clearly fall below the legal standard for unprotected incitement speech. 5 130 S. Ct. 2705 (2010). 6 Id. at 2724–29 (using much of the opinion to justify the statute in light of the government’s evidence as to its necessity for the war on terror). 7 See HLP, 130 S. Ct. at 2734 (Breyer, J., dissenting). 2013 / Valuing Speech and OSINT in the Face of Judicial Deference 388 HLP not only appears to be constitutionally dubious, but it will also likely decrease the ability of the intelligence community to fight the war on terror. Deviating from established jurisprudence to protect § 2339B will likely rob us of valuable OSINT at exactly the time when the need for OSINT is most acute. Fear of terrorism and a desire to defer to the executive caused the Court to underestimate the dangers of chilling domestic and foreign speech, including—most ironically—speech that is necessary to advance counterterrorism initiatives.8 These policies threaten academics, journalists, and other individuals with access to terrorists groups who produce OSINT, a vital stream of information for a domestic understanding and prosecution of the war on terror.9 While each of these positions is individually harmful, in combination they will exact far more damage on the Government’s intelligence efforts. Part II of this Article details the vital importance of OSINT in the war on terror, repeated Congressional findings of the same, and recommendations for stronger OSINT collection, analysis, and dissemination.10 Part III of this Article explores three recent examples—two by the Executive Branch and one by the Supreme Court—of government actions that disrupt OSINT. The three examples discussed in Part III are (1) the Executive Branch’s view that “incitement” speech—a category of speech that receives no First Amendment protection—is broader in scope in the context of an enemy alien’s solicitation trial; (2) the Executive Branch’s treatment and detention of foreign reporters; and (3) the Supreme Court’s adoption of an expansive definition of a material support statute in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project.11 This case is given special attention because it provided the Court with an opportunity to value speech and because recent jurisprudence counseled a different result. Part IV of this Article discusses the dangers of chilling both domestic and foreign speech and why this chilling implicates OSINT.12 Part V of this Article discusses the possible 8 For the proposition that these holdings arise out of a desire to defer to the executive see, for example, HLP, 130 S. Ct. at 2727–30. See also id. at 2727 (finding that “evaluation of the facts by the Executive, like Congress’s assessment, is entitled to deference”). 9 Brief for the Academic Researchers and the Citizen Media Law Project as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents/Cross-Petitioners, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705 (2010) (Nos. 08-1498, 09-89) 2009 WL 4271309 [hereinafter CMLP Brief].
Recommended publications
  • Informality, Ngos, and Cairo's Trash Collectors
    Informality, NGOs, and Cairo’s Trash Collectors Economic and Social Welfare Policy in the Authoritarian Egyptian State Caroline Abadeer Submitted under the supervision of Professor Ben Ansell to the University Honors Program at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude, in Political Science. May 3, 2011 ABSTRACT The following analysis provides a theoretically informed explanation of how Cairo‘s Zabbaleen (informal trash collectors) fit into the political story of economic development in Egypt. Egypt presently faces much uncertainty as its citizens call for change during an era of political reordering. Their demands stem largely from the breakdown of the ―authoritarian bargain‖ that once characterized state-society relations, as since the 1970s, the government has promoted economic liberalization and abandoned social welfare provision as a fundamental objective. This move limited opportunities available to the urban poor through the public and private sectors, leading to escalated growth in the informal economy and the third sector of non- governmental organizations. The informal sector has offered greater opportunities for employment, even as social welfare provision became the responsibility of NGOs, whose influence is strongly apparent among Egypt‘s poor. As a dispossessed societal group, the Zabbaleen offer a useful lens through which to evaluate the effects of policy change upon one segment of the populace; many of the risks they face as informal workers have been partially mitigated by the efforts of numerous NGOs that support them. Yet the uncertainty that continues to characterize the condition of the Zabbaleen also provides insight into tensions inherent within the coexistence of the authoritarian state system and an extensive informal economy and third sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Issue As
    yber C y b e r O r i e n t Online Journal of the Virtual Middle East Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 2012 ISSN 1804-3194 CyberOrient Online Journal of the Virtual Middle East © American Anthropological Association 2012 CyberOrient is a peer-reviewed online journal published by the American Anthropological Association in collaboration with the Faculty of Arts of Charles University in Prague. Editor-in-Chief: Daniel Martin Varisco Managing Editor: Vit Sisler ISSN 1804-3194 http://www.cyberorient.net yber Index - Editorial Ines Braune – The Net Worth of the Arab Spring Page 4 - Articles Mohammed El-Nawawy and Sahar Khamis – Political Activism 2.0: Comparing the Role of Social Media in Egypt’s “Facebook Revolution” and Iran’s “Twitter Uprising” Page 8 Heidi A. Campbell and Diana Hawk – Al Jazeera’s Framing of Social Media During the Arab Spring Page 34 Donatella Della Ratta and Augusto Valeriani – Remixing the Spring!: Connective leadership and read-write practices in the 2011 Arab uprisings Page 52 Anton Root – Beyond the Soapbox: Facebook and the Public Sphere in Egypt Page 77 - Comments Mervat Youssef and Anup Kumar – Beyond the Soapbox: Facebook and the Public Sphere in Egypt Page 101 - Reviews Jon W. Anderson – The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Informati- on Technology and Political Islam Page 133 Marek Cejka – The Arab Revolution: The Lessons from the Democratic Uprising Page 141 3 yber C y b e r O rient, Vol. 6 , I s s . 1 , 2 0 1 2 The Net Worth of the Arab Spring Ines Braune Keywords Islam and civil society, Middle East, Arab Spring, information and communication technology, media studies, Middle Eastern studies, social networks When I was asked to be the guest editor of the current issue of CyberOrient, I realized this is a welcome opportunity to arrange and re-sort some aspects, points, and arguments about the role of the media during the Arab Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • How Has European Integration Impacted Regionalist Political Parties’ Electoral Support?
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2021 A Europe of Regionalists: How Has European Integration Impacted Regionalist Political Parties’ Electoral Support? Brandon N. Piel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Piel, Brandon N., "A Europe of Regionalists: How Has European Integration Impacted Regionalist Political Parties’ Electoral Support?" (2021). CMC Senior Theses. 2669. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2669 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College A Europe of Regionalists: How has European integration impacted regionalist political parties’ electoral support? Submitted to Professor Lisa Langdon Koch by Brandon N. Piel for Senior Thesis Fall 2020 – Spring 2021 April 26, 2021 Abstract This study investigates the question: How has European integration impacted regionalist political parties’ electoral support? European integration and regionalism are theoretically connected by Seth Jolly’s viability theory which explains that supranational organizations, such as the European Union (and precursor organizations), make small countries more viable. Using the regions of Flanders, Corsica, Sardinia, Padania, Galicia, and Catalonia as case studies, this thesis identifies
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Energy, and the Arab Awakening
    Global Agenda 2013: Water, Energy, and the Arab Awakening FOREWORD BY ABDEL SALAM MAJALI EDITED BY THOMAS S. AXWORTHY AND ZAFAR ADEEL GLOBAL AGENDA 2013: Water, Energy, and the Arab Awakening GLOBAL AGENDA 2013: PAPERS FOR THE INTERACTION COUNCIL SERIES [ VOLUME 3 ] WATER, ENERGY, AND THE ARAB AWAKENING Edited by THOMAS S. AXWORTHY AND ZAFAR ADEEL ©United Nations University, 2014 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the United Nations University. Available from: United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH) 175 Longwood Road South, Suite 204 Hamilton, ON L8P 0A1 CANADA Telephone: +1-905-667-5511 Fax: +1-905-667-5510 E-mail: [email protected] The United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health is a member Web: inweh.unu.edu of the United Nations University family of Facebook: facebook.com/UNUINWEH organizations. It is the UN Think Tank on Twitter Handle: @UNUINWEH Water created by the UNU Governing Council in 1996. The mission of the institute is to help Available for download at: resolve pressing water challenges that are of http://inweh.unu.edu concern to the United Nations, its Member States, and their people, through knowledge- ISBN: 978-92-808-6046-7 based synthesis of existing bodies of scientifi c discovery; through cutting edge targeted research that identifi es emerging policy issues; through application of on-the-ground UNU-INWEH is supported by: scalable solutions based on credible research; and, through relevant and targeted public Foreign Affairs, Trade and Affaires étrangères, Commerce outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • NOV 2015 Part C.Pdf
    Page | 1 CBRNE-Terrorism Newsletter – NOVEMBER 2015 www.cbrne-terrorism-newsletter.com Page | 2 CBRNE-Terrorism Newsletter – NOVEMBER 2015 Counterterrorism Bookshelf: 16 Books on Terrorism & Counter- Terrorism-Related Subjects Reviewed by Joshua Sinai Source: http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/465/html This column consists of capsule reviews of recent books from various publishers. Aon and Risk Advisory, 2015 Terrorism & Political Violence Risk Map – A Guide (London, UK: The Risk Advisory Group, 2015), 38 pp. + map, no price [Paperback], http://www.aon.com/terrorismmap/. This is an annually published map on the risk of terrorism and political violence around the world, which is further analyzed in the accompanying booklet. The guide’s findings and assessments are based on what it terms empirical ‘Terrorism Tracker’ data assembled by The Risk Advisory Group and Aon. The Risk Advisory Group is a global risk consultancy, based in London, and Aon is a global risk management, insurance brokerage and reinsurance brokerage firm. In the map, what are termed ‘peril’ icons are assigned to the world’s countries, covering a spectrum of political violence risks from low to high that are aggregated on a cumulative basis in the form of terrorism, sabotage, strikes and/or riots, malicious damage, insurrection, revolution and rebellion, mutiny and/or coup d’etat, and war and/or civil war. The booklet presents an introductory commentary, macro analysis and findings, regional overviews, and the methodology underpinning the overall analysis. Edward J. Appel, Cybervetting: Internet Searches for Vetting, Investigations, and Open-Source Intelligence [Second edition] (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015), 322 pp., US $ 67.96 [Hardcover], ISBN: 9781482238853.
    [Show full text]
  • Piracy Off the Horn of Africa
    Piracy off the Horn of Africa Lauren Ploch Analyst in African Affairs Christopher M. Blanchard Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs R. Chuck Mason Legislative Attorney Rawle O. King Analyst in Financial Economics and Risk Assessment September 28, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40528 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Piracy off the Horn of Africa Summary Pirate attacks in the waters off the Horn of Africa, including those on U.S.-flagged vessels, have brought new U.S. and international attention to the long-standing problem of piracy in the region. The International Maritime Bureau (IMB) recorded 111 attacks in the waters off the Horn of Africa in 2008, almost double the number in 2007. As of September 14, 2009, the U.S. State Department reported 156 attacks had occurred in those waters since January 2009, with 33 successful hijackings. Attacks remain concentrated in the Gulf of Aden between Yemen and the northern coast of Somalia and along Somalia’s eastern coastline. However, in July 2009, the United Nations Secretary General warned that “as a result of the military presence in the region, pirates have employed more daring operational tactics, operating further seawards, towards the Seychelles, and using more sophisticated weaponry.” Pirate attacks continue to threaten commercial shipping and relief shipments bound for East Africa and the Horn, amid a regional humanitarian crisis that experts are calling the worst since 1984. The increase in pirate attacks off the Horn of Africa is directly linked to continuing insecurity and the absence of the rule of law in war-torn Somalia.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabic-Egyptian
    ARABIC-EGYPTIAN Egyptian men, Assuit Governorate Flickr/USAID Egypt DLIFLC DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CENTER CULTURAL ORIENTATION | Arabic-Egyptian Profile Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 Geographic Divisions .................................................................................................. 7 Nile River Valley and Delta ................................................................................8 Western Desert (Al-Ṣaḥraʾ al-Gharbiyyah) .....................................................8 Eastern Desert (Al-Ṣaḥraʾ al-Libiyah) ..............................................................9 Sinai Peninsula (Shibh Jazirat Sina) ................................................................9 Climate ..........................................................................................................................10 Bodies of Water ...........................................................................................................11 Nile River (Baḥr Al-Nil) ..................................................................................... 11 Lake Nasser ........................................................................................................ 12 Suez Canal ......................................................................................................... 12 Mediterranean Sea ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meredith A. Crowley
    Meredith A. Crowley Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge Austin Robinson Building Sidgwick Avenue Cambridge, CB3 9DD, UK tel: +44 1223 335261 [email protected] http://meredithcrowley.weebly.com/ Current positions/affiliations/honors University of Cambridge Reader in International Economics, Faculty of Economics 2018 – present Keynes Fellow, University of Cambridge 2019 – present Fellow, St. John’s College 2013 – present University Lecturer, Faculty of Economics 2013 – 2018 Cambridge-INET (Institute for New Economic Thinking) Coordinator, Transmission Mechanisms and Economic Policy 2018 – present UK in a Changing Europe (UKICE), London, UK ESRC Senior Fellow 2019 – present Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London, UK Research Fellow 2016 – present UK Department for International Trade, London, UK Trade and Economy Panel (Academic Advisor) 2019 – present Freeports Advisory Panel (Academic Advisor) 2019 – present Trade and Agriculture Commission (Competitiveness Working Group Member) 2020 – present Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany Member of the Scientific Advisory Council 2019 – present UK Department for Food, Agriculture and Rural Affairs, London, UK National Food Strategy Advisory Panel (Academic Advisor) 2019 – present UK Government Office for Science, Rebuilding a Resilient Britain Project 2020 – present Trade and Aid Working Group Member Previous positions/appointments/honors Bruegel, Brussels, Belgium Member of the Scientific Council 2018 – 2020 Nanjing University Visiting Professor November 2018 Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Visiting Professor, Summer School 2014, 2015 & 2019 Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Senior Economist 2006 – 2014. Economist 2001 – 2006. American Law Institute Advisor, Principles of the Law of World Trade Project 2008 – 2012. Pew Charitable Trusts Advisory Board Member, Subsidyscope Project 2008 – 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Standards Committee Bulletin, Issued February 2017
    Editorial Standards Findings Appeals to the Trust and other editorial issues considered by the Editorial Standards Committee November and December 2016, issued February 2016 Decisions by the Head of Editorial Standards, Trust Unit January 2017, issued February 2016 Getting the best out of the BBC for licence fee payers Contents Contents 1 Remit of the Editorial Standards Committee 2 Summary of findings 4 Appeal Findings 8 (i) BBC Scotland Investigates, Lies Laws and the Bin Lorry Tragedy, BBC One (Scotland) 3 November 2015; and 8 (ii) The Jeremy Vine Show, BBC Radio 2, 8 December 2015 8 Appeal against the application of the Expedited Complaints Procedure at Stage 1 and various other appeals including a request to review the Trust Unit’s decision that an appeal against the decision of the BBC not to respond further to the complainant at Stage 1b with regard to a number of editorial appeals had no reasonable prospect of success. 26 Requests to review the Trust Unit’s decisions on appeals 44 Great Barrier Reef with David Attenborough, BBC One, January 2016 44 Victoria Derbyshire, BBC Two/BBC News Channel 6 & 8 June 2016 57 ”Welsh election: Green Party confident of electing AMs”, BBC News online (Wales Election 2016) 8 April 2016 67 “Welsh election: Green Party vow to ‘make history’”, BBC News online (Wales Election 2016) 12 April 2016 67 Woman’s Hour, BBC Radio 4, 28 January 2016 71 BBC coverage of climate change 76 My Life: I am Leo, CBBC, 21 March 2016 81 Appeals against the decisions of BBC Audience Services not to correspond further with
    [Show full text]
  • BBC 4 Listings for 1 – 7 July 2017 Page 1 of 4 SATURDAY 01 JULY 2017 the Early Punk Machinations of the 'Mock Rock' New York Mingei Pottery Dolls
    BBC 4 Listings for 1 – 7 July 2017 Page 1 of 4 SATURDAY 01 JULY 2017 the early punk machinations of the 'mock rock' New York Mingei Pottery Dolls. Archive from the pinnacle year, 1973, features Roxy SAT 19:00 Britain and the Sea (b03lbv22) Music, The Wailers and Vinegar Joe. The programme's finale The final episode features one of Japan's most famous family of Trade and Romance celebrates the advent of punk and new wave with unforgettable potters - the Hamadas. Shoji Hamada was a major figure in the performances from Patti Smith, Blondie, Iggy Pop and The Mingei folk art movement of the 1920s and '30s and helped This third episode traces the crucial importance of the sea to Jam. turn the town of Mashiko into a major centre of ceramics, Britain's trade and to individual livelihoods of coastal famous for its thick and rustic pottery. He also spent time in communities. Joined on this leg of his epic sail by his son Fred, Artists featured are Elton John, Lindisfarne, David Bowie, Britain where he taught renowned St Ives potter Bernard Leach David follows the trade routes of the west coast of Scotland Curtis Mayfield, Gladys Knight & The Pips, Steppenwolf, the art of Japanese pottery. along the monumental channels that cut through the romantic Vinegar Joe, Brinsley Schwarz, New York Dolls, Argent, Bob Highlands and brought wealth and prosperity to the heart of Marley & The Wailers, Captain Beefheart, Johnny Winter, Dr Today, his grandson Tomoo Hamada continues the family Scotland. The journey starts at Craobh Haven and takes David Feelgood, Gil Scott Heron, Patti Smith, Tom Petty & The tradition and this film follows him at work, painstakingly along the Crinan Canal, around the Isle of Bute and up the Heartbreakers, Cher & Gregg Allman, Talking Heads, The Jam, shaping his pots and firing them in an old-style wood-fuelled River Clyde towards Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to U.K. Health & Disease Media Contacts Covering COVID-19
    Guide to U.K. Health & Disease Media Contacts Covering COVID-19 In response to the surge in news and commentary on coronavirus, Agility PR Solutions used its media monitoring and research tools to compile a selection of media contacts in different industries who are covering COVID-19. Using our extensive media database makes it easy to find - and connect with - the journalists and influencers that matter to you. CONTACT NAME OUTLET NAME JOB TITLE Ian Jones 5 News Editor (The Wright Stuff) Georgia Seago Aesthetic Medicine Deputy Editor Vicky Eldridge Aesthetic Medicine Editor Matthew Annals of The Royal College of Head of Publishing Whitaker Surgeons of England Steve Evans Artemis.bm Founder/Editor-in-Chief Cat Jones Asthma Magazine Head of Media Emily Henderson AZoCleantech Editor Jon Kay BBC Breakfast Presenter Emlyn Begley BBC London Sports journalist Sarah Collerton BBC News & Current Affairs Journalist Victoria King BBC News & Current Affairs News Daily Writer Alexandra Fouché BBC News Online Digital Journalist Katie Wright BBC News Online Journalist Patrick Jackson BBC News Online Journalist Tom Feilden BBC Radio 4 Science & Environment Editor Bryony Hopkins BBC Stories Senior Journalist Vicky Baker BBC World News Senior journalist Mike Powell BBC World Service Network Journalist Christian Fraser Beyond 100 Days Presenter Sandy Starr BioNews Webmaster Akshat Rathi Bloomberg Reporter Hailey Waller Bloomberg Reporter / Producer John Ainger Bloomberg Reporter Teresa Jobson BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Production Editor Care Jess Mark
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Royall Editor, BBC News at Ten Media Masters – October 11, 2018 Listen to the Podcast Online, Visit
    Paul Royall Editor, BBC News at Ten Media Masters – October 11, 2018 Listen to the podcast online, visit www.mediamasters.fm Welcome to Media Masters, a series of one-to-one interviews with people at the top of the media game. Today, I’m here at BBC New Broadcasting House and joined by Paul Royall, editor of the BBC Six O’Clock News and 10 O’Clock News. After beginning his career in newspapers, he joined the Beeb in 1997 as part of the original News 24 team, and later moved to BBC Breakfast where he was appointed deputy editor in 2004. In 2007, Paul left his role to join the BBC’s flagship news team, taking the reins as editor six years later. In his five years in the editor’s chair, he has overseen two general elections, the Scottish referendum, Brexit and the election of Donald Trump. Paul, thank you for joining me. Thank you. So, Paul, a busy five years then? It’s been an amazingly busy five years, an extraordinary five years. I remember when I was given the job, which was a huge privilege to become editor of the BBC’s Six and 10 O’Clock News, they’re, as you said, flagship programmes on the front page of BBC News. I remember at the time, the one anxiety I had was taking the programmes through a general election, because there’s in many ways nothing more important for the BBC and BBC News than getting it right during a general election. So having gone through two general elections, a Scottish referendum, an EU referendum and things like the election of Donald Trump, that wasn’t quite what I was expecting at the beginning when I got the job.
    [Show full text]