DOCSLIB.ORG

Shakespeare and European Theatrical Cultures: Anatomizing Text and Stage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shakespeare and European Theatrical Cultures: Anatomizing Text and Stage 2017 ESRA Congress programme Shakespeare and European Theatrical Cultures: AnAtomizing Text and Stage 27 – 30 July 2017 Organisers: University of Gdańsk and Gdańsk Shakespeare Theatre I. PLENARY SPEAKERS 1. Peter Holland University of Notre Dame, USA "Forgetting Shakespeare Performance" This paper will range widely across the topic of Shakespeare and forgetting before concentrating on the ease with which performance is forgotten. Peter Holland is McMeel Family Professor in Shakespeare Studies in the Department of Film, Television and Theatre, and Associate Dean for the Arts at the University of Notre Dame. He moved there in 2002 from the UK where he was Director of the Shakespeare Institute in Stratford-upon-Avon. He is co-General Editor for a number of series, including Oxford Shakespeare Topics (Oxford University Press), Shakespeare in the Theatre (Arden Shakespeare), Great Shakespearean (Bloomsbury Academic) and the Arden Shakespeare 4th series. He is Editor of Shakespeare Survey. He was elected Chair of the International Shakespeare Association in 2017. He is currently editing King Lear for Arden 4 and writing a book on Shakespeare and Forgetting. 2. Diana E. Henderson Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA "Hard Hearts and Coronets: Anatomizing Resistance and Community with Shakespeare Now" After a year of Shakespearean commemorative celebrations, “the fierce urgency of now” has intruded upon scholarly pursuits and theatrical events in more incongruous ways. In the US, making Shakespeare our contemporary has led to death threats directed at that (seemingly) most benign of theatrical subgenres, the outdoor summer festival. In Europe, the uncertainty unleashed by the Brexit referendum challenges border crossings and collaborations, while the core issues of violence and inequity that have prompted mass migrations grow ever more grotesque; at the same time, remarkable performances and conferences provide precious, fragile occasions for considering what boundary-crossing Shakespeares can do. Both celebrating and resisting comedy as a genre and humor as a nationalized fiction, this talk reflects upon the recent Merchant in Venice project and a classic Ealing Studio film to examine the errant, timely potential of the outsider, the literary, and the academic observer. Diana E. Henderson, Professor of Literature and MacVicar Faculty Fellow at MIT, is the author of Collaborations with the Past: Reshaping Shakespeare Across Time and Media, Passion Made Public: Elizabethan Lyric, Gender, and Performance, and many scholarly essays. She edited Routledge’s Alternative Shakespeares 3 and Blackwell’s Concise Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, and (with James R. Siemon) is co-editor of the annual Shakespeare Studies. Henderson served as President of the Shakespeare Association of America in 2014, and has worked as a dramaturg and professional theatrical consultant in the US and Europe. She is currently involved in both online and performance projects, including MIT's Global Shakespeares curricular and archival initiatives and an aligned MITx module drawing on The Merchant in Venice project. 3. Małgorzata Grzegorzewska University of Warsaw, Poland “Shakespeare's curtain. The stage revealed or the stage re-veiled?” In their reflections concerning the phenomenology of perception, contemporary philosophers stress the difference between being witness to the “extravagant rhapsody” of the visible (J.-L. Marion) and the purposefulness of looking which involves “concentrating diffuse visibility” (M. Merleau-Ponty). In traditional, classic realist theatre our perception is controlled by the curtain which rises at the beginning and is lowered at the end of the performance (or of each act). In early modern plays, on the other hand, the audience was frequently reminded of the “extravagant rhapsody” of the casually visible, for instance when they saw the shape-shifting clouds floating over their heads during performances in open-air theatres. Shakespeare, however, also made ample use of a kind of curtain: the traverse or hangings which allowed him to separate the action displayed on the stage from that which – at least for the time being – had to remain hidden and secret. In The Winter’s Tale, for example, the curtain concealing the statue of Hermione statue brings to mind the veil which covered the face of Alcestis raised from the dead at the end of Euripides’s play. It may thus add to the mystery enveloping her apparent resurrection. The use of a space of concealment/discovery not only enhances the dramatic effect, but opens theatre to the incandescence of that which remains partly (or temporarily) out of sight. In my paper, I will try to analyse the interplay of concealment and discovery in contemporary performances of Shakespeare’s plays. In other words, I wish to show how the phenomenology of the (in)visible gives way to the metaphysics of the revealed in contemporary theatre. Małgorzata Grzegorzewska is Professor of British Literature and current Head of the Institute of English Studies at the University of Warsaw. She has published extensively on William Shakespeare, English drama and poetry of the 16th and 17th century. Her first book, Medicine of Cherries. English Renaissance Theories of Poetry (Institute of English Studies UW, 2005), dealt with the impact of the Reformation on English Renaissance poetics. Her most recent books include a study of George Herbert’s poetry viewed through the prism of Jean-Luc Marion’s philosophy of donation (A Gift for Our Times. George Herbert and Post-Phenomenology, Peter Lang 2016); and a collection of meditations on the interplay of divine Word and literature: Światłocienie. Osiem odsłon Słowa w literaturze brytyjskiej od Hopkinsa do Hughesa [Literary Chiaroscuro. Eight Glimpses of the Word in British Literature from Hopkins to Hughes, Homini, forthcoming]. She has also co-edited (with Jean Ward and Mark Burrows) two volumes of essays devoted to the intersections of poetry and theology: Breaking the Silence (Peter Lang 2015) and Poetic Revelations (Routledge 2016). Her main areas of interest include the connections between literature, philosophy and theology (in her research she focuses on the existentialist thought of Søren Kierkegaard, René Girard’s theory of mimetic rivalry and Jean-Luc Marion’s philosophy of donation). Together with Abbot Szymon Hiżycki OSB she convenes a cycle of workshops Poetry and Meditation in the Benedictine Monastery of Tyniec. II. PANELS PANEL 1: “Shakespearean hybridities: Appropriations, gestures, alternative realities” Convener: Martin Procházka, Charles University, Czech Republic In his “Foreword” to the volume Philosophical Shakespeares (2000), Stanley Cavell points to Shakespeare’s “appropriability” as a potential explanation for his uniqueness. For Cavell, “the idea of appropriability is not meant to prejudge the degree to which lines, scenes, plays may resist certain appropriations less or more than others;” instead, it helps in “assessing cultural position.”1 The papers in this panel discuss Shakespeare not as an inherent attribute of any text or production but as a marker of “appropriability” resulting from a cultural consensus in every age. Through the lens of the theoretical concept of hybridity, the proposed panel offers innovative contributions to our ongoing deliberations about author Shakespeare and his works. These contributions understand hybridity both ontologically, since no unmediated, authentic presence of Shakespeare’s works exists, as well as performatively, since these works function as “interfaces” facilitating cultural communication. Our contributions draw on recent works such as Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation2 and recent articles in the Journal Borrowers and Lenders and Multicultural Shakespeares,3 but our proposed panel will argue that the potentiality of Shakespeare’s appropriations arises in the structural openness of Shakespeare’s works, whereas ethical implications are secondary, referring only to the impact of individual appropriations. Panellists: 1. Márkus Zoltán, Vassar College, USA “The (Un)timeliness of Shakespeare’s Hybridity” With the aid of a specific (or idiosyncratic) understanding of the concept of appropriation that suggests appropriations are reciprocal manoeuvers of hybridization that negotiate and construct both their subjects and their objects at the same time, this contribution investigates Shakespeare as a cultural hybrid produced in various historical and cultural contexts. This paper accepts the view that Shakespeare’s works have no immediate, unmediated authentic presence; they are always already displaced. At the same time, it proposes that temporal 1 Stanley Cavell, “Foreword,” Philosophical Shakespeares, ed. John J. Joughin (London and New York: Routledge, 2000) xiii. 2 Ed. Alexa Huang and Elizabeth Rivlin (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2014). 3 http://www.borrowers.uga.edu/, ISSN 1554-6985. Gen. Eds. Christy Desmet and Sujata Iyengar, University of Georgia; http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/mstap, ISSN 2300-7605. Eds-in-Chief Krystyna Kujawińska- Courtney and Yoshiko Kawachi. University of Łódż. dimensions of Shakespearean appropriations remain crucial: the “originality” of Shakespeare’s plays rests in the (ongoing) history of these appropriations. In this sense, Shakespeare’s originality is not an inherent feature of his plays but a retroactive and relational outcome of appropriating Shakespeare. By drawing on current philosophical debates about perdurantism versus endurantism as well
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dissertation Final Aug 31 Formatted
    Identity Gerrymandering: How the Armenian State Constructs and Controls “Its” Diaspora by Kristin Talinn Rebecca Cavoukian A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Kristin Cavoukian 2016 Identity Gerrymandering: How the Armenian State Constructs and Controls “Its” Diaspora Kristin Talinn Rebecca Cavoukian Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2016 Abstract This dissertation examines the Republic of Armenia (RA) and its elites’ attempts to reframe state-diaspora relations in ways that served state interests. After 17 years of relatively rocky relations, in 2008, a new Ministry of Diaspora was created that offered little in the way of policy output. Instead, it engaged in “identity gerrymandering,” broadening the category of diaspora from its accepted reference to post-1915 genocide refugees and their descendants, to include Armenians living throughout the post-Soviet region who had never identified as such. This diluted the pool of critical, oppositional diasporans with culturally closer and more compliant emigrants. The new ministry also favoured geographically based, hierarchical diaspora organizations, and “quiet” strategies of dissent. Since these were ultimately attempts to define membership in the nation, and informal, affective ties to the state, the Ministry of Diaspora acted as a “discursive power ministry,” with boundary-defining and maintenance functions reminiscent of the physical border policing functions of traditional power ministries. These efforts were directed at three different “diasporas:” the Armenians of Russia, whom RA elites wished to mold into the new “model” diaspora, the Armenians of Georgia, whose indigeneity claims they sought to discourage, and the “established” western diaspora, whose contentious public ii critique they sought to disarm.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 9 of the Convention
    United Nations CERD/C/GEO/4-5 International Convention on Distr.: General 25 February 2011 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention Fourth and fifth periodic report due in 2008* Georgia** [31 May 2010] * This document contains the combined fourth and fifth periodic report of Georgia, due on 2 July 2006 and 2008 respectively. For the second and third periodic reports and the summary records of the meetings at which the Committee considered those reports, see documents CERD/C/461/Add.1 and CERD/C/SR.1705 and 1706. ** In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.11-41285 (E) 080311 CERD/C/GEO/4-5 Contents Paragraphs Page Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 3 I. General.................................................................................................................... 2–13 3 A. Status of international law and national legal framework .............................. 3–4 3 B. International legal instruments relating to human rights ................................ 5 4 C. State institutions and other specialized bodies combating discrimination...... 6–11 4 D. Civil integration policy..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Petros Adamian December 21, 1845 — June 4, 1891
    H M U M6I CLENTEL ARARAD MASNAJOV>I M<AGOV:AXIN PA+AMOVNK HOMENETMEN GLENDALE ARARAT CHAPTER CULTURAL DIVISION Get to Know… Volume 1, Issue 8 December 2008 Petros Adamian December 21, 1845 — June 4, 1891 Petros Adamian , an outstanding Armenian actor, poet, writer, artist and public figure, was born December 21, 1845 in Constantinople, (modern Istanbul ) . According to the Russian critics, his interpretations of Hamlet and Othello put Adamian's name among the best tragedians of the world. Adamian's mother died when he was one and a half years old. His artistic career started in 1866 at the Armenian theatre in Constantinople. Shakespeare plays, in 1887 he wrote the Since 1879 he performed in Baku, Shushi, “Shakespeare and his Hamlet tragedy criticism" Alexandrapol, Tiflis. In 1880's, when the research. He also made translations from Ottoman Turkish reaction "held the national Shakespeare, Victor Hugo, Semen Nadson, minorities in scorn", Adamian had an artistic Nicolai Nekrasov. tour in foreign (Russian and Ukrainian) cities, acting both in Armenian and French languages. Adamian died of a throat cancer, in the Russian In 1888 a Russian theatrical critic wrote about hospital. Petros Adamian in "Odessky Vestnik": "Not Adamian’s traditions were developed by Armenian Possart, not Rossi, not Barnai, no one of actors Siranuysh, Hovhannes Abelian and others. European actors visitted to Russia gave us so absolute, artistically complete Hamlet as Mr. The Armenian Drama Theatre of Tiblisi is named Adamian did". after Adamian. In 1888 he returned to Constantinople. Among his best roles of that period: King Lear, Arbenin (Lermontov's "Masquerade"), Khlestakov (Gogol's "Revisor"), Mikael (Sundukian's "One more victim"), etc Being a “great Shakespearean actor” and the first Armenian scientifical reasercher of William.
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation of Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA The Situation of Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia !"#$ The Public Defender Of Georgia The present report was published with finansial support of the EU funded project “Support to the Public Defender’s Office of Georgia”. The views expressed in this publication do not represent the views of EUROPEAN UNION the European Union. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA The Situation of Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia !"#$ THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA www.ombudsman.ge OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA 6, Ramishvili str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +995 32 2913814; +995 32 2913815 Fax: +995 32 2913841 E-mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................7 HUMAN RIGHTS IN CLOSED INSTITUTIONS (REPORT OF THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM) .................................11 SITUATION IN PENITENTIARY INSTITUTIONS ...........................11 THE PENITENTIARY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM AND TORTURE PREVENTION MECHANISMS ............................................38 HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE AGENCIES UNDER THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS .................................................60 CONDITIONS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS IN PENITENTIARY INSTITUTIONS, THE INSTITUTION FOR INVOLUNTARY PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT AND TEMPORARY DETENTION ISOLATORS ................65 RIGHTS OF CHILDREN IN SMALL FAMILY-TYPE CHILDREN’S HOMES .....70 AMNESTY AND PAROLE .................................................83 FAILURE TO FULFILL THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S LAWFUL
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Embassies in Armenia
    2 MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA “STATE PROTOCOL SERVICE” AGENCY Mr. Vardan Asoyan Acting Chief of State Protocol (060) 620512 Mr. Vahan Charkhchyan Deputy Chief (060) 620513 Mr. Arshak Manoukian Deputy Chief (060) 620513 Official Visits Division (060) 620511 Mrs. Anna Khachatrian Acting Head of Diplomatic Staff Division (060) 620511 Mrs. Anahit Hovsepian Head of Diplomatic Missions Division (060) 620510 MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA “STATE PROTOCOL SERVICE” AGENCY DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS 3 Argentina Kazakhstan Belarus Kuwait Brazil Lebanon Bulgaria Lithuania China Poland Czech Republic Romania Egypt Russia European Union Sovereign Military Order of Malta France Switzerland Georgia Syria Germany Turkmenistan Greece Ukraine India United Kingdom Iran United States of America Iraq NKR Italy REPRESENTATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS WITH DIPLOMATIC STATUS United Nations International Federation of Red Cross and UN Development Programme Red Crescent UN High Commissioner for Refuges International Finance Corporation UN Children’s Fund International Monetary Fund UN World Food Programme International Organization for Migration Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS International Science and Technology Center UN Department of Public Information Interstate Bank Council of Europe (Office of the SRSG) World Health Organization European Bank for Reconstruction and World Bank Development Organization for Security and Cooperation in Eurasian Development Bank Europe International Committee of Red Cross Asian
    [Show full text]
  • Pp. 81-117. BOGHOS LEVON ZEKIYAN ARMENIAN SELF-PERCEPTION BETWEEN OTTOMAN
    Published: Orientalia Christian Periodica , 75 (2009), pp. 81-117. BOGHOS LEVON ZEKIYAN ARMENIAN SELF-PERCEPTION BETWEEN OTTOMANS AND SAFAVIDS * A historical model of Christian-Muslim interrelation and an attempt to re-evaluate its message Preliminary remarks Owing to a large extent to the geopolitical position of their homeland, the Armenians, in their millennia-long history, have felt themselves almost constantly challenged to face a great diversity of peoples, cultures, and religions: Achemenids and Hellens, Romans and Parthians, Sasanians and Byzantines, Arabs, Seljuks, Italians, Franks, as well as other Europeans, plus Mongolians, Slavonians, both Seljuk and Ottoman Turks, Safavids; and in modern times, Russians and Western Europeans, to mention only the main political formations around Armenia or in close political and cultural relationship with it. To those we must add minor political entities such as, for instance, Georgia, and in recent times Azerbaijan, and some prevalently ethnic or religious-confessional groups such as the Caucasian Albanians or the Syriac. In most of those cases Armenians found themselves almost crushed between two superpowers of the moment, as it was the case with Parthians and Romans, Byzantines and Sasanians, Ottomans and Safavids, Ottomans and Russians. Such multifarious relationships with neighbouring peoples, states and cultures caused, of course, numerous problems of very different nature, problems often extremely hard to resolve going as far as to touch the limits of survival. But survival itself has different aspects. Not always when people survive, do we see them in full possession of their linguistic, cultural, religious, and anthropological heritage. There often occurs a drastic change of religion, of language, of ancestral customs, so that in most cases survival is really a very partial maintenance of what a given community was and had earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 ESRA Congress Programme
    2017 ESRA Congress programme Shakespeare and European Theatrical Cultures: AnAtomizing Text and Stage 27 – 30 July 2017 Organisers: University of Gdańsk and Gdańsk Shakespeare Theatre I. PLENARY SPEAKERS 1. Peter Holland University of Notre Dame, USA "Forgetting Shakespeare Performance" This paper will range widely across the topic of Shakespeare and forgetting before concentrating on the ease with which performance is forgotten. Peter Holland is McMeel Family Professor in Shakespeare Studies in the Department of Film, Television and Theatre, and Associate Dean for the Arts at the University of Notre Dame. He moved there in 2002 from the UK where he was Director of the Shakespeare Institute in Stratford-upon-Avon. He is co-General Editor for a number of series, including Oxford Shakespeare Topics (Oxford University Press), Shakespeare in the Theatre (Arden Shakespeare), Great Shakespearean (Bloomsbury Academic) and the Arden Shakespeare 4th series. He is Editor of Shakespeare Survey. He was elected Chair of the International Shakespeare Association in 2017. He is currently editing King Lear for Arden 4 and writing a book on Shakespeare and Forgetting. 2. Diana E. Henderson Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA "Hard Hearts and Coronets: Anatomizing Resistance and Community with Shakespeare Now" After a year of Shakespearean commemorative celebrations, “the fierce urgency of now” has intruded upon scholarly pursuits and theatrical events in more incongruous ways. In the US, making Shakespeare our contemporary has led to death threats directed at that (seemingly) most benign of theatrical subgenres, the outdoor summer festival. In Europe, the uncertainty unleashed by the Brexit referendum challenges border crossings and collaborations, while the core issues of violence and inequity that have prompted mass migrations grow ever more grotesque; at the same time, remarkable performances and conferences provide precious, fragile occasions for considering what boundary-crossing Shakespeares can do.
    [Show full text]
  • Project1eng Layout 1
    Humanitarian Border Management REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Needs and Gaps Assessment Report Yerevan 2016 The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration ¥IOM¤. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. The assessment team would like to acknowledge, with gratitude, the assistance and cooperation provided by the Armenian Government and its officials in conducting this assessment. Without their patience and willingness to participate and contribute, this report would not have been possible. The team also thank the representatives of international organizations such as UNHCR, the Red Cross Society of Armenia, UNDP and others for their cooperation. Finally, the expert is profoundly grateful to the IOM staff members from IOM Armenia, namely Ilona Ter-Minasyan and Sonya Armaghanyan, for their advice and assistance during the assessment. Assessment and report prepared by: Adrian Loxton This publication has been issued without formal language editing by IOM. Publisher: International Organization for Migration IOM Mission in Armenia: UN House • 14 Petros Adamian Street, 1st floor • Yerevan 0010 • Armenia Tel.: ¥+374 10¤ 58 56 92 Fax: ¥+374 10¤ 54 33 65 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.iom.int © 2016 International Organization for Migration ¥IOM¤ All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration in Armenia: a Country Profile 2008  List of Tables
    MigrationMigration inin Armenia:Armenia: AA CountryCountry ProfileProfile 20082008 17 route des Morillons CH-1211 Geneva 19, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 717 9111 • Fax: +41 22 798 6150 E-mail: [email protected] • Internet: http://www.iom.int US $15.00 The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Prepared by: Alin Chindea Magdalena Majkowska-Tomkin Heikki Mattila Isabel Pastor Edited by: Sheila Siar Publisher: International Organization for Migration 17 route des Morillons 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland Tel: +41.22.717 91 11 Fax: +41.22.798 61 50 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iom.int _____________________________________________________ ISBN 978-92-9068-476-3 ISBN 978-92-9068-517-3 (Migration in the Black Sea Region: Regional Overview, Country Profiles and Policy Recommendations) © 2008 International Organization for Migration (IOM) _____________________________________________________ All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Research on Irregular Migration in the Republic of Armenia
    BASELINE RESEARCH ON IRREGULAR MIGRATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Yerevan 2013 UDC 314.7 The report was prepared within the framework of the “Supporting the establishment of eff ective readmission management in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia” Regional Project funded by the European Commission and the IOM Development Fund and the “Building capacity of government structures in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia for the eff ective management of readmission and return” Regional Project funded by the IOM Development Fund The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefi ts migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Report prepared by: Mr Vahe Mambreyan Publisher: International Organization for Migration IOM Mission in Armenia: UN House • 14 Petros Adamian Street, 1st fl oor • Yerevan 0010 • Armenia Tel: (+374 10) 58 56 92 Fax: (+374 10) 54 33 65 http://www.iom.int ____________________________________________________ © 2013 International Organization for Migration (IOM) All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Document on the Implementation of the National
    ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL CONCEPT FOR TOLERANCE AND CIVIC INTEGRATION AND ACTION PLAN FOR 2009-2014 JUNE, 2014 UDC (უაკ) 316.647+316.4.063 R-44 Assessment document on the Implementation of the National Concept on Tolerance and Civic Integration and Action Plan for 2009-2014 was prepared by the Office of the State Minister of Georgia for Reconciliation and Civic Equality in partnership with a group of invited experts. This document was discussed with the State Inter-Agency Commission, established for the implementation of the National Concept for Tolerance and Civic Integration and Action Plan for 2009-2014. Invited experts: SHALVA TABATADZE, GIORGI SORDIA, MAMUKA KOMAKHIA, GIORGI MSHVENIERADZE, GIORGI AMARIANI © 2014, UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA Opinions and ideas provided in this publication do not represent the official position of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United Nations Association of Georgia (UNAG). ISBN 978-9941-0-6741-9 DISTRIBUTED FREE OF CHARGE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 ABOUT THE RESEARCH 7 OFFICE OF THE STATE MINISTER OF GEORGIA FOR RECONCILIATION AND CIVIC EQUALITY 9 MAIN DIRECTIONS: Rule of Law 11 Education and state language 27 Media and access to information 81 Political integration and civic participation 97 Social and regional integration 119 Culture and preservation of identity 131 RECOMMENDATIONS 163 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 177 INTRODUCTION Creating a state policy for the civil integration of national minorities and its effective implementation is an important priority for the country. This policy aims to protect the rights of ethnic minorities, help integrate them fully into society, and support the establishment and promotion of a tolerant environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Analysis of Civil Integration of Ethnic Minorities in Georgia
    POLICY ANALYSIS OF CIVIL INTEGRATION OF ETHNIC MINORITIES IN GEORGIA BTKK – Policy Research Group Ethnic Minorities Program The study was published with funding of the UK Department for International Development (Grant AG 5053). Opinions expressed in the study may not refl ect the opinions of the UK Department for International Development. Department for International DFID Development 2008 Tbilisi 1 Project Director: Mamuka Komakhia Project Coordinator: Revaz Bakhtadze Legal Expert: Nino Khaindrava © 2008 BTKK – Policy Research Group ISBN 978-991-0-062-1 2 Preface BTKK-Policy Research Group prepared the “Policy Analysis of Civil Integration of Ethnic Minorities in Georgia” within the framework of Ethnic Minorities Program, with the financial support of the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Studying the problems of ethnic minorities is one of the priority activity of BTKK-Policy Research Group. BTKK-Policy Research Group expresses hope that the studies produced within the framework of Ethnic Minorities Program will assist the decision-makers in Georgia in determining the policies and making decisions in the field of civil integration of ethnic minorities. Currently, the national concept and action plan on tolerance and civil integration is being developed within the framework of the Council for Tolerance and Civil Integration, which unites representatives of governmental and non-governmental organizations. BTKK-Policy Research Group believes that it is most crucial at this very stage to analyze main challenges of civil integration and to offer recommendations to decision-makers for developing a long-term strategy. The study consists of two parts: the first part analyzes main challenges of civil integration and offers recommendations for their solution.
    [Show full text]